426 Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, April-June 2021, Vol. 12, No. 2 Factors Influencing the Quality of Primary Healthcare Services in Southern Senatorial District of , Nigeria

Uzomba Amalachukwu E.1, Ndep Antor O.2, Uzomba Chigozie I.3, Ekpenyong Bernadine N.4, Edom Awara E.5

1Research Scholar, Department of Public Health, 2Senior Lecturer/Researcher, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, 3Lecturer/Researcher, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, 4Senior Lecturer/Researcher, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, 5Research Scholar, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of , Calabar, Nigeria

Abstract Background: The aim of this study is to determine the factors influencing the quality of primary healthcare services in southern senatorial district of Cross River State, Nigeria.

Materials and Method: A cross sectional descriptive study design with both qualitative and quantitative method of data collection was used. Donabedian’s structure, process and outcome model guided the research protocol. Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from Cross River State Ministry of Health Ethics Committee. Two semi-structured questionnaires and a Focus Group Discussion Guide were used for data collection. Four hundred and eighty clients and 144 healthcare providers from 12 primary healthcare centres in the study area were selected by simple random sampling method. Statistical package for social sciences version 20.0 was used to analyze the quantitative data while thematic coding was used to analyse the qualitative data.

Results: The major structure factors mitigating the quality of care as observed by the healthcare providers include insufficient manpower 58(40.28%), lack of basic amenities (light, water supply and goodroad) 58(40.28%), insufficient equipment 26(18.06%), insecurity and communal crises 22(15.28%). The perceptions of the clients were similar to that of the healthcare providers. In terms of process factors; poor attitude of some healthcare providers and clients was the main response of healthcare professionals. The qualitative results were similar to that of quantitative. All the basic primary health care services (including health education, health promotion, environmental sanitation, immunization, reproductive health, nutrition, HIV/AIDS and oral care) were provided in the selected health centres except mental health.

Conclusions: The quality of healthcare services in the southern senatorial district,Cross River State, Nigeria, is affected by structure and process factors of the Donabedian’s model.

Keywords: Caregivers, Clients, Quality, Primary Healthcare.

Introduction World Health Organization (WHO), defines Quality Corresponding Author: of Care as the extent to which healthcare services Dr. Uzomba CI provided to individuals and patient populations improve Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, desired health outcomes,hence, healthcare must be College of Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, safe, effective, timely, efficient, equitable, and people PMB 1115, Calabar, Nigeria centered.1 Health care and quality are inextricable, Contact No.: +2348037344688 therefore to provide health care services without e-mail: [email protected] concern for quality is unprofessional and potentially Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, April-June 2021, Vol. 12, No. 2 427 deadly.2 Quality improvement is a key function of health population projected at 1,590,200 in 2016 from the 2006 managers who lead the process at every level of the national population census and land mass of 9,731 square health system. kilometres, and is bounded by Akwa Ibom State to the South, Yakuur Local Government Area to the North, Improving quality through improving structures Abi Local Government Areas, Cross River state to the and processes leads to a reduction of waste of resources West and the Republic of Cameroon to the East where (human, material and finance), delays (long waiting the Atlantic Ocean lies.13-15 It has the largest forest area time by clients before being attended to at the health in the state with a very fertile land and the people are facilities), lower costs and enhances positive image of mostly subsistent farmers.13 the organization.3,4 This is a cross sectional descriptive study, both 5 In an Iranian study by Mosadeghrad, factors qualitative and quantitative method of data collection influencing the quality of care were identified as patients’ were used. Four Local Government Areas (, socio-demographic variables, patients’ co-operation with Calabar Municipality, and ) care, provider socio-demographic variables, provider were selected using simple random sampling method motivation and satisfaction, provider-competence, through balloting with replacement out of the seven 6 resources and facilities. Bradly et al, suggested that Local Government Areas in the study area. Three any effort to strengthen health systems in Africa must primary healthcare (PHC) facilities were randomly incorporate strategy to improve access and quality of selected from each of the selected LGAs, making a total health care services particularly in rural areas. of twelve. Ethical clearance for the study was obtained WHO,7 stated that although Nigeria constituted less from the Health Research Ethics Committee, Ministry than 1% of the total world’s population, she accounts of Health, Cross River State, Nigeria. Donabedian’s for about 19% of the global maternal deaths, with a structure, process and outcome model guided the maternal mortality ratio of 814 per 100,000 live births. In research protocol. Two semi-structured questionnaires Nigeria, approximately 2,300 under-five-year-olds and and a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) Guide were the 145 women of childbearing age die daily, these deaths instruments for data collection. 8 are mostly preventable. These increased mortality The study population comprises health care rates are linked to delays and poor quality of care in the professionals and clients aged 18 years and above, 9 health system of the country as observed by Oyekale. who work in and/or utilize PHC facilities in Southern 10 Babatunde et al, in their study in north central Nigeria, senatorial district of Cross River state, Nigeria. Sample suggested the need to train Primary Health Care size for the clients was 480 obtained using Cochran’s providers on improvement of quality of care. Utilization formula16 while that of health care professionals were of maternity care in 2013 was low and only about 36% 144 using simple percentage of the population of the of births occurred in health facilities with 38% being desired category of healthcare professionals in the 11 assisted by skilled personnel. This shows that Nigeria PHCs in the selected Local Government Areas,17as is still far from achieving the universal health coverage recommended by Ejifugha.18 and quality health care for all. Hence, the need to assess the factors influencing the quality of primary healthcare Four hundred and eighty clients and one hundred services which is the foundation of the health system in and forty four healthcare providers from the 12 Primary order to improve the quality of care and also, improve healthcare centres were selected by simple random the health status of the people which is an indicator of sampling method. Five field assistants were trained to development of any nation. assist the researcher in data collection. The questionnaires were administered to the health professionals and each Materials and Method client on exit, having received care, after obtaining his The study was carried out in the Southern Senatorial or her verbal informed consent. The respondents filled District of Cross River State, Nigeria from September, the questionnaire but where the client had limited ability 2018 to August, 2019. Southern Senatorial District is in reading and writing English language, the researcher made up of seven Local Government Areas (LGAs) and the trained field assistants explained the hard to read namely: , Akpabuyo, , , Calabar terms in consistent Pidgin English and he/she is assisted Municipality, Calabar South, and Odukpani.12 It has a to tick the appropriate response. 428 Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, April-June 2021, Vol. 12, No. 2 Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was conducted to Results explore the clients’ perception of the quality of care. Out of the four hundred and eighty clients,18(3.8%) One session of the FGD was done in one of the selected were males, 462 (96.3%) were females giving a M:F PHCs in each of the four selected Local Government ratio of 1:26, aged 18 to 57 years. Majority were married Areas. The four sessions of the FGD conducted 395(82.3%), while others were single 78(16.3%), widow/ comprised 8 participants per session with the researcher widower 5(1%) and separated 2(0.4%). Most completed as the facilitator, two trained field assistants as the note secondary education 273(56%) but 13(2.7%) had no taker and the observer. Participants were recruited using formal education, 125(26%) had tertiary education purposive sampling method. The focus group discussion and 69 had primary education. However,one hundred was guided by a set of protocol with questions that sought and forty-four healthcare providers were recruited for to explore the experiences of the clients in the selected the study, 11(7.6%) were males and 133(92.4%) were PHCs and their perceptions of the factors influencing the females giving a M:F ratio of 1:12. The healthcare quality of care using Donabedian’s model for measuring providers were mainly Community Health Extension quality of care. Workers (CHEWs) 95(66%) while most had Ordinary The quantitative data obtained from the study was National Diploma (OND) level of education 64(44.4%). entered, coded, cleaned and analyzed using the Statistical All the basic primary health care services (including Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. health education, health promotion, environmental Thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative sanitation, immunization, reproductive health, nutrition, data generated from FGD. HIV/AIDS and oral care) were provided except mental illness.

Table 1: Healthcare professionals’ perception of the factors influencing the quality of care

Factors Frequency (N) Percentage (%) Structure Insufficient manpower 58 40.3 Lack of basic amenities (light, water supply and good road) 58 40.3 Insufficient equipment 26 18.1 Poor security services and communal crises 22 15.3 Lack of functioning fans and Air conditioners 20 13.9 Poor infrastructure 17 11.8 Insufficient offices and poor ventilation 15 10.4 Inadequate essential drug supply 14 9.7 Lack of in-service training for workers 11 7.6 Poor incentives and irregularity in salaries of workers 12 8.3 Poor management system 4 2.8 Lack of good accommodation for workers 9 6.3 Lack of good cold chain system 5 3.5 Poor waste management and environmental sanitation 4 2.8 Socio-cultural factors e.g. language barrier 5 3.5 Socioeconomic status of clients e.g. poverty and illiteracy 6 4.2 Lack of Gardeners/ Cleaners 3 2.1 Long distance of residence from the PHC 5 3.5 Process Poor attitude of clients 18 12.5 Poor attitude of the healthcare workers to their job 18 12.5 *Multiple responses Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, April-June 2021, Vol. 12, No. 2 429 Table 2: Client’s perception of the factors influencing the quality of care at the PHCs

Response Frequency (N) Percentage (%) Structure Poor building facilities 137 28.5 Lack of constant Electricity supply 67 14.0 Lack of comfortable chairs 48 10.0 Cost of treatment and lack of free drugs 43 9.0 Non functioning fans 30 6.3 Inadequate health providers 29 6.0 Insufficient beds 27 5.6 Inadequate water supply 26 5.4 Lack of good toilet facilities 20 4.2 Poor environmental sanitation 19 4.0 Insufficient equipment for workers 12 2.5 Lack of audiovisual aids and T.V 8 1.7 Distance of PHC from home 4 0.8 Inadequate security and protectors 1 0.2 Process Poor time management by health providers 7 1.5 Poor attitude of healthcare providers 1 0.2 Strike action 1 0.2

*Multiple responses

Discussion Clients’ perception of the factors influencing the quality of care revealed that lack of expansion and The healthcare providers’ perception of the factors renovation of the building, lack of adequate light and influencing the quality of care in this study is in keeping water supply, lack of comfortable chairs, beds and with the Donabedian’s model.19 The major structure functioning fans, high cost of treatment and lack of good factors as observed by the healthcare providers include toilet facilities werethe major structure factors identified insufficient manpower, lack of basic amenities (light, in this study (Table 2). This agrees with the study water supply and good road), insufficient equipment, carried out in Lagos, Nigeria by Ogunnowo et al.22Other insecurity, communal crises, poor infrastructure, findings include; long distance of the PHC from home, inadequate essential drug supply, poor incentives and inadequate security and protectors, inadequate health irregularity in payment of salary of workers(Table 1). care providers, poor environmental sanitation, lack of These findings are in keeping with the study carried audiovisual aids and television. These findings were out in Kenya by Wanjau et al.20 Other structure factors similar to those of Alzaied and Alshammari.23 mentioned includes lack of in-service training for workers, lack of accommodation for workers, socio- Concerning process factors as perceived by the cultural factors like language barrier, lack of good cold clients, poor time management by the healthcare chain and poor management system. providers, strike actions by workers and poor attitude of healthcare providers were identified to influence the In terms of process factors, poor attitude of some quality of care in this study (Table 2). This is similar to healthcare providers and clients were the main response the findings of Mosadeghrad21 and Ogunnowo et al.22 of healthcare professionals. This is similar to the findings The qualitative results from the focused group discussion of Mosadeghrad,21 in Iran. Hence, when a patient were similar to that of quantitative. behaves well, caregivers unintentionally provide better services but if the patient is grumpy, the healthcare Majority of the clients in this study were females provider will not be motivated for further care, thereby (96.3%), married (82.3%) and had at least secondary reducing the quality of care. education (82.9%). These findings were similar to those 430 Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, April-June 2021, Vol. 12, No. 2 of Ihaji et al,24 Babatunde et al 10 and Khan et al.25 the clients in these PHCs who participated in the study. Female education is important in decision making in We acknowledge Oluchi Okoro, Goodluck Kamuche and relation to their health, children and family members Nonso Okoro for their assistance in the data collection. thereby influencing the quality of care. Conflict of Interest: None Healthcare providers in this study were mainly females (92.4%). Majority of them were Community Source of Funding: Self Health Extension Workers (CHEWs) and Junior Community Health Extension Workers (JCHEWs) References (72.3%) and Nurses (22.3%). This is similar to the 1. World Health Organization. Maternal newborn findings of Kadiri-Eneh et al.26 This female dominated child and adolescent health. Geneva, 2018. occupation in Nigeria was also observed by Campbell and Retrieved June 4,2018 from WHO.int/maternal- Ebuehi.27 This difference may have policy implications child-adolescent/topics/quality-of-care/definition/ for recruitment of more males to serve in difficult and hard en/ to reach areas. Also, few doctors (1.4%) were observed 2. Adindu A. Assessing and Assuming Quality of in this study, hence majority of the healthcare providers Healthcare in Africa. Africa Journal of medical belong to the low cadre (CHEWS and JCHEWS) across sciences 2010;3(1):31-36. the PHCs in the Southern Senatorial District of Cross 3. Lagrosen Y, Lagrosen S. The effects of quality River State. The caliber of personnel employed at the management. A survey of Swedish Quality PHCs also influences the quality of care. professionals. International Journal of operations Majority of the services provided at the selected and production Management 2005;25:940. primary health centres (PHCs) in this study include Available from Doi:10.1108/D1443570510619464. provision of health education, health promotion, 4. Rahman SA. Comparative study of TQM practice environmental sanitation, immunization, reproductive and organizational performance with and without health, nutrition, HIV/AIDS and oral care. This agrees ISO good certification. International Journal of with the study by Obembe, et al28 carried out in Abuja, Quality & Reliability Management 2001; 18:35-49. Nigeria; where similar services were provided. The Available from Doi:10.1108/02656710110364486. services provided in this study were adequate in all 5. Mosadeghrad AM. Healthcare service quality: components of PHCs except mental health. This may be Towards a broad definition. International Journal due to the presence of Federal Neuropsychiatric hospital of Healthcare quality assurance 2013;26.203-19. in the District where most mental cases may present. Available from Doi:10.1108/09 52636/311311409. 6. Bradley E, Thompson J, Rojam P, Webster T, Conclusion Zerihun A, Alpen R, et al. Access and Quality The healthcare providers’ perception of the of Rural healthcare; Ethiopian Millenium Rural factors influencing the quality of care were insufficient initiatives. Int J Qual Health Care 2011;23(3):222- manpower, insufficient equipment to communal crises 30. while clients’ perception of the factors influencing the 7. WHO. Water sanitation and hygiene in healthcare quality of care revealed mainlypoor infrastructure, lack facilities. Status in low and middle income countries of basic amenities, high cost of treatment and lack of free and way forward. Geneva, 2015 Retrieved July 7, drugs and inadequate health care providers,and poor time 2018 from http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream.10665/ management by the healthcare providers among others. 154588/1/9789241508476eng.pdf. These findings show that PHCs in Southern Senatorial 8. Budg IT. Nigeria Health Budget Analysis. Policy District are affected by structure, process and outcome Brief first Quarter 2018. Retrieved July 2, 2018 factors which should be addressed to enhancethe quality from www.budgit.com of care. 9. Oyekale AS. Assessment of primary health care Acknowledgments: We thank all the heads and facilities’ service readiness in Nigeria. BMC staff of the primary healthcare centres used for this study Health Serv Res 2017;17:172. Available from Doi. in the southern senatorial district of Cross River State, org/10.1186/512113017-2112-8. Nigeria for their cooperation. We sincerely appreciate all Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development, April-June 2021, Vol. 12, No. 2 431 10. Babatunde OA, Aiyenigba E, Awoyemi OA, sector national hospital. International journal of Akande TM, Musa OI, Saludeen AG, et al. Primary humanities and social science 2012;2:13. health care consumers’ perception of quality of 21. Mosadeghrad AM. Factors influencing healthcare care and its determinants in North Central Nigeria. service quality. International Journal of Health Journal of Asian Scientific research 2013;3(7):775- Policy and Management 2014;3(2):77-89. 785. Available from Doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014. 65 11. National Population Commission, ICF International. 22. Ogunnowo BE, Olufunlayo TF, Suile SS. Clients’ Nigeria demographic and health survey 2013. perception of Services quality at the out-patient Abuja, 2014. Retrieved July 17, 2018 from google clinics of a General Hospital in Lagos. Pan Africa scholar. Medical Journal 2015;22:68. Available from 12. Government of Cross River State, Nigeria. The Doi.10.11604/pariy.2. Economic Blueprint towards recurring our future. 23. Alzaied TAM, Alshammari A. An Evaluation of A publication of the Cross River State Economic primary Healthcare centres services: The news Management Team, Calabar, 2011. of users. Health science Journal 2016;10(2):15. 13. Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Retrieved 15th November, 2020 from http://www. Development, Nigeria. Final report prioritisation hsj.gr/archive.php of intervention areas in Cross River State and 24. Ihaji E, Eze UG, Ogwuche CH. Educational Level, selection of initial road programme.Abuja, 2006. sex and church Affiliation on Health Seeking 14. National Population Commission. Population Behaviour among Parishioners in Makurdi Projection 2016. Retrieved September 26, 2020 Metropolis of Benue State. Journal of Educational from https://www.citypopulation.de policy and entrepreneurial research 2014;1(2):311 15. United Nations High Commissioner Refugees – 316. (UNHCR). Nigeria: Reference Map Cross River 25. Khan S, Idrees B, Sajid MR. The impact of women’s State. UNHCR Nigeria, 2019. Retrieved September education on maternal healthcare utilization in 26, 2020 from http://www.unchr.org/ Rural Gujrat, Pakistan. International Journal of 16. Bluman AC. Elementary Statistics. 5th ed. New Advances in Doctoral Research 2012;1(1):17-20. York: McGraw-Hill, 2004;349. 26. Kadiri-Eneh NP, Azuike EC, Tobin-West C, 17. Cross River State Primary Healthcare Development Uzochukwu BSC. An Assessment for potentials of Agency. Population of Healthcare Professionals Retention of Primary Healthcare in Rivers State, Southern Senatorial District, Cross River State. Nigeria. Afrimedic Journal 2018;6(1):35-51. Calabar, 2018. 27. Campbell PC, Ebuehi OM. Job Satisfaction: 18. Ejifugha AU. Fundamentals of research in Health Rural Versus Urban Primary Healthcare Workers’ Education. Owerri: Luso Pub, 2004; 23-85. Perception in Ogun State, Nigeria. West African Journal of Medicine 2011;30(6):408 – 142. 19. Donabedian A. The Quality of care. How can it be assessed? Journal of American Medicine 28. Obembe TA, Osungbade KO, Ibrahim C. Appraisal Association 1988;260:1743-1748. of primary healthcare services in Federal capital territory. Abuja Nigeria: how committed are the 20. Wanjau KN, Muiruri BW, Ayodo E. Factors health workers? The Pan African Medical Journal affecting the provision of service of quality in 2017;28(134). Available from Doi.10.11604/ the public health sector. A case of Kenyatta panj.2017. 28.134.12444.