DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Source Used in Staros 21.24

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Source Used in Staros 21.24 Open Source Used In StarOS 21.24 Cisco Systems, Inc. www.cisco.com Cisco has more than 200 offices worldwide. Addresses, phone numbers, and fax numbers are listed on the Cisco website at www.cisco.com/go/offices. Text Part Number: 78EE117C99-1146164124 Open Source Used In StarOS 21.24 1 This document contains licenses and notices for open source software used in this product. With respect to the free/open source software listed in this document, if you have any questions or wish to receive a copy of any source code to which you may be entitled under the applicable free/open source license(s) (such as the GNU Lesser/General Public License), please contact us at [email protected]. In your requests please include the following reference number 78EE117C99-1146164124 Contents 1.1 acpid 2.0.22 1.1.1 Available under license 1.2 tokyo-cabinet 1.4.48 1.2.1 Available under license 1.3 ntp 4.2.8p10 1.3.1 Available under license 1.4 libxml 2.9.2 1.4.1 Available under license 1.5 python-setuptools 28.8.0 1.5.1 Available under license 1.6 libnuma 2.0.11 1.6.1 Available under license 1.7 exabgp 3.4.17 1.7.1 Available under license 1.8 usbutils 006 1.8.1 Available under license 1.9 zlib 1.2.11 1.9.1 Available under license 1.10 bind 9.8.0 1.10.1 Available under license 1.11 zlib 1.2.7 1.11.1 Available under license 1.12 libedit 2.1 1.12.1 Available under license 1.13 libnet 1.1.2.1 1.13.1 Available under license Open Source Used In StarOS 21.24 2 1.14 dosfs-tools 2.11 1.14.1 Available under license 1.15 open-ldap 2.4.33 1.15.1 Available under license 1.16 ndpi 1.51.2 1.16.1 Available under license 1.17 ethtool 2.6 1.17.1 Available under license 1.18 libvmtools 10.1.5.6677369 1.18.1 Available under license 1.19 nfs-utils 1.1.1 1.19.1 Available under license 1.20 collector 0.9.4 1.20.1 Available under license 1.21 zopfli 1.2.11 1.21.1 Available under license 1.22 libsgutils 1.35 1.22.1 Available under license 1.23 libtommath 0.42.0 1.23.1 Available under license 1.24 iptables 1.4.5 1.24.1 Available under license 1.25 dmidecode 3.5 1.25.1 Available under license 1.26 procps 3.2.6 1.26.1 Available under license 1.27 sysv-init 2.78-4 1.27.1 Available under license 1.28 liburcu 0.8.6 1.28.1 Available under license 1.29 vpp-papi 1.6.2 1.29.1 Available under license 1.30 gmp 6.0.0 1.30.1 Available under license 1.31 curl 7.62.0 1.31.1 Available under license 1.32 pigz 2.4 1.32.1 Available under license 1.33 popt 1.5 Open Source Used In StarOS 21.24 3 1.33.1 Available under license 1.34 ipmiutil 2.1.1 1.34.1 Available under license 1.35 libsrtp 1.4.4 1.35.1 Available under license 1.36 netkit-telnet 0.17 1.36.1 Available under license 1.37 bridgeutils 1.5 1.37.1 Available under license 1.38 pam 0.72 1.38.1 Available under license 1.39 e2fsprogs 1.38 1.39.1 Available under license 1.40 rng-tools 5 1.40.1 Available under license 1.41 ncurses 5.6 1.41.1 Available under license 1.42 libffi 3.2.1 1.42.1 Available under license 1.43 binutils 2.23.52 1.43.1 Available under license 1.44 pip 9.0.1 1.44.1 Available under license 1.45 iperf 3.2 1.45.1 Available under license 1.46 setserial 2.17 1.46.1 Available under license 1.47 libnfsidmap 0.20 1.47.1 Available under license 1.48 zlib 1.2.5 1.48.1 Available under license 1.49 exabgp 3.4.16 1.49.1 Available under license 1.50 iconv 2.17 1.50.1 Available under license 1.51 busybox 1.9.0 1.51.1 Available under license 1.52 python 3.6.1 1.52.1 Available under license Open Source Used In StarOS 21.24 4 1.53 python-packaging 20.8 1.53.1 Available under license 1.54 openssl 1.0.2k 1.54.1 Available under license 1.55 uclibc 0.9.30.1 1.55.1 Available under license 1.56 xfsprogs 2.8.16 1.56.1 Available under license 1.57 pkix-ssh 11.0 1.57.1 Available under license 1.58 libdnet 1.11 1.58.1 Available under license 1.59 tcp-dump 3.1.0 1.59.1 Available under license 1.60 libtomcrypt 1.17 1.60.1 Available under license 1.61 crash 7.1.9 1.61.1 Available under license 1.62 pcre 8.41 1.62.1 Available under license 1.63 libpcap 0.9.2 1.63.1 Available under license 1.64 iproute 2.6.18 1.64.1 Available under license 1.65 xfsprogs 2.8.16-1 1.65.1 Available under license 1.66 libcap 1.10 1.66.1 Available under license 1.67 net-snmp 5.1.1 1.67.1 Available under license 1.68 expat 2.1.0 1.68.1 Available under license 1.69 open-iscsi 2.0.873 1.69.1 Available under license 1.70 hostapd 0.5.7 1.70.1 Available under license 1.71 libusb 1.0.9 1.71.1 Available under license 1.72 busybox 1.26.2 Open Source Used In StarOS 21.24 5 1.72.1 Available under license 1.73 gdb 7.1.9 1.73.1 Available under license 1.74 ncurses 5.9 1.74.1 Available under license 1.75 zlib 1.2.3 1.75.1 Available under license 1.76 iputils s20070202 1.76.1 Available under license 1.77 gdb 6.6 1.77.1 Available under license 1.78 ipmi-tool 1.8.9 1.78.1 Available under license 1.79 ftpd-bsd 0.3.2 1.79.1 Available under license 1.80 html5lib-python 1.0b9 1.80.1 Available under license 1.81 libnl3 3.2.25 1.81.1 Available under license 1.82 libmnl 1.0.3 1.82.1 Available under license 1.83 sysv-init 2.78 1.83.1 Available under license 1.84 smartmontools 6.1 1.84.1 Available under license 1.85 pciutils 3.1.8 1.85.1 Available under license 1.86 libevent 2.0.5-beta 1.86.1 Available under license 1.87 rdma-core 46mlnx1 1.87.1 Available under license 1.88 zlib 1.2.8 1.88.1 Available under license 1.89 zlib 1.1.3 1.89.1 Available under license 1.90 bash 2.05b 1.90.1 Available under license 1.91 python 3.6.9 1.91.1 Available under license Open Source Used In StarOS 21.24 6 1.92 netkit-tftp 0.17 1.92.1 Available under license 1.93 glib 2.46.2 1.93.1 Available under license 1.94 xmlrpc-c 1.06.38 1.94.1 Available under license 1.95 zlib 1.1.4 1.95.1 Available under license 1.96 bzip2 1.0.6 1.96.1 Available under license 1.97 python 3.6.6 1.97.1 Available under license 1.98 rsync 3.1.2 1.98.1 Available under license 1.99 glibc 2.17 1.99.1 Available under license 1.100 erlang-otp 20.3.8.19 1.100.1 Available under license 1.101 kexec-tools 2.0.14 1.101.1 Available under license 1.102 procps 3.2.6 1.102.1 Available under license 1.1 acpid 2.0.22 1.1.1 Available under license : GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, June 1991 Copyright (C) 1989, 1991 Free Software Foundation, Inc. 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this license document, but changing it is not allowed. Preamble The licenses for most software are designed to take away your freedom to share and change it. By contrast, the GNU General Public License is intended to guarantee your freedom to share and change free software--to make sure the software is free for all its users. This General Public License applies to most of the Free Software Foundation's software and to any other program whose authors commit to using it. (Some other Free Software Foundation software is covered by Open Source Used In StarOS 21.24 7 the GNU Library General Public License instead.) You can apply it to your programs, too. When we speak of free software, we are referring to freedom, not price. Our General Public Licenses are designed to make sure that you have the freedom to distribute copies of free software (and charge for this service if you wish), that you receive source code or can get it if you want it, that you can change the software or use pieces of it in new free programs; and that you know you can do these things.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Data Compression: Dictionary-Based Coding 2 / 37 Dictionary-Based Coding Dictionary-Based Coding
    Dictionary-based Coding already coded not yet coded search buffer look-ahead buffer cursor (N symbols) (L symbols) We know the past but cannot control it. We control the future but... Last Lecture Last Lecture: Predictive Lossless Coding Predictive Lossless Coding Simple and effective way to exploit dependencies between neighboring symbols / samples Optimal predictor: Conditional mean (requires storage of large tables) Affine and Linear Prediction Simple structure, low-complex implementation possible Optimal prediction parameters are given by solution of Yule-Walker equations Works very well for real signals (e.g., audio, images, ...) Efficient Lossless Coding for Real-World Signals Affine/linear prediction (often: block-adaptive choice of prediction parameters) Entropy coding of prediction errors (e.g., arithmetic coding) Using marginal pmf often already yields good results Can be improved by using conditional pmfs (with simple conditions) Heiko Schwarz (Freie Universität Berlin) — Data Compression: Dictionary-based Coding 2 / 37 Dictionary-based Coding Dictionary-Based Coding Coding of Text Files Very high amount of dependencies Affine prediction does not work (requires linear dependencies) Higher-order conditional coding should work well, but is way to complex (memory) Alternative: Do not code single characters, but words or phrases Example: English Texts Oxford English Dictionary lists less than 230 000 words (including obsolete words) On average, a word contains about 6 characters Average codeword length per character would be limited by 1
    [Show full text]
  • A New Way of Accelerating Web by Compressing Data with Back Reference-Prefer Geflochtener
    442 The International Arab Journal of Information Technology, Vol. 14, No. 4, July 2017 A New Way of Accelerating Web by Compressing Data with Back Reference-Prefer Geflochtener Kushwaha Singh1, Challa Krishna2, and Saini Kumar1 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Rajasthan Technical University, India 2Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Panjab University, India Abstract: This research focused on the synthesis of an iterative approach to improve speed of the web and also learning the new methodology to compress the large data with enhanced backward reference preference. In addition, observations on the outcomes obtained from experimentation, group-benchmarks compressions, and time splays for transmissions, the proposed system have been analysed. This resulted in improving the compression of textual data in the Web pages and with this it also gains an interest in hardening the cryptanalysis of the data by maximum reducing the redundancies. This removes unnecessary redundancies with 70% efficiency and compress pages with the 23.75-35% compression ratio. Keywords: Backward references, shortest path technique, HTTP, iterative compression, web, LZSS and LZ77. Received April 25, 2014; accepted August 13, 2014 1. Introduction Algorithm 1: LZ77 Compression Compression is the reduction in data size of if a sufficient length is matched or it may correlate better with next input. information to save space and bandwidth. This can be While (! empty lookaheadBuffer) done on Web data or the entire page including the { header. Data compression is a technique of removing get a remission (position, length) to longer match from search white spaces, inserting a single repeater for the repeated buffer; bytes and replace smaller bits for frequent characters if (length>0) Data Compression (DC) is not only the cost effective { Output (position, length, nextsymbol); technique due to its small size for data storage but it transpose the window length+1 position along; also increases the data transfer rate in data } communication [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Daftar Pustaka.Pdf
    Hak cipta dan penggunaan kembali: Lisensi ini mengizinkan setiap orang untuk menggubah, memperbaiki, dan membuat ciptaan turunan bukan untuk kepentingan komersial, selama anda mencantumkan nama penulis dan melisensikan ciptaan turunan dengan syarat yang serupa dengan ciptaan asli. Copyright and reuse: This license lets you remix, tweak, and build upon work non-commercially, as long as you credit the origin creator and license it on your new creations under the identical terms. Team project ©2017 Dony Pratidana S. Hum | Bima Agus Setyawan S. IIP DAFTAR PUSTAKA Adhitama, G. 2009. Perbandingan Algoritma Huffman Dengan Algoritma Shannon-Fano. Institut Teknologi Bandung. Alakuijala, H., Kliuchnikov, E., Szabadka, Z., & Vandevenne, L. 2015. Comparison of Brotli, Deflate, Zopfli, LZMA, LZHAM and Bzip2 Compression Algorithm. Alakuijala, J., & Szabadka, Z. 2016. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Tersedia dalam: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc7932.txt. [Diakses tanggal 11 November 2017] Anggriani, M. 2011. Perbandingan Metode Kompresi Huffman dan Dynamic Markov Compression (DMC). Bell, C. A. 2007. Expert MySQL. New York: Apress. Boedi, D., Rustamaji, H. C., & Nugraha, M. A. 2009. Aplikasi Kompresi SMS Berbasis JAVA ME Dengan Metode Kompresi LZW-Huffman. UPN "Veteran" Yogyakarta,. Dalam Seminar Nasional Informatika. Darmawan, D. 2014. Pengembangan E-Learning Teori dan Desain. Eka, N. 2016. Pengembangan E-learning Dengan Schoology Pada Materi Dinamika Benda Tegar. Universitas Lampung Salomon, D. 2007. Data Compression The Complete Reference Fourth Edition, hal. 2. Fransisca, C. 2014. Implementasi Algoritma Kompresi Deflate Pada Website Berbasis PHP dan Basis Data Mysql. Google. 2015. Github. Brotli. Tersedia dalam: https://github.com/google/brotli. [Diakses tanggal 25 Mei 2017] Harahap, E. M., Rachmawati, D., & Herriyance.
    [Show full text]
  • Combinatorial Optimization Problems in Internet Applications
    Poznań University of Technology Institute of Computing Science Combinatorial optimization problems in Internet applications Doctoral thesis Jakub Marszałkowski Supervisor: prof. dr hab. inż. Maciej Drozdowski Poznań, 2017 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Motivation . 4 1.2 Scope and Puropose . 5 1.3 Methodology . 6 1.4 Common webpage-related factors . 10 1.5 Outline of the Thesis . 11 2 Layout Partitioning for Advertisements Fit 13 2.1 Website’s Layouts and Ad Placement . 13 2.2 Problem Formulation . 16 2.3 Objective Functions . 19 2.3.1 Max Ad Number Function . 20 2.3.2 Max Most Difficult to Pack Ad Unit Function . 20 2.3.3 Min Single Ad Waste . 20 2.4 Solution Method . 21 2.4.1 Combining Ad Units . 22 2.4.2 Valid Column Widths List . 23 2.4.3 Browsing Layouts . 24 2.4.4 Selecting Final Results . 25 2.4.5 Example For a Small Instance . 25 2.5 Benchmarks . 27 2.5.1 Data Sets . 27 2.5.2 Webmaster Survey . 27 2.6 Computational Experiments . 29 2.6.1 Input Parameters . 29 2.6.2 Execution Times . 31 2.6.3 Layout Partitioning Results and Discussion . 31 2.7 Conclusions . 35 3 Tag Cloud Construction 37 3.1 Tag Clouds . 37 3.2 Problem Analysis and Related Work Survey . 38 3.2.1 Tag cloud taxonomy . 38 3.2.2 Related work . 40 3.2.3 Tag Cloud Usability Studies . 42 3.2.4 Tag Clouds for the Web . 43 3.2.5 Client Side . 44 3.2.6 Analysis of Packing Problem Properties .
    [Show full text]
  • Context-Aware Encoding & Delivery in The
    Context-Aware Encoding & Delivery in the Web ICWE 2020 Benjamin Wollmer, Wolfram Wingerath, Norbert Ritter Universität Hamburg 9 - 12 June, 2020 Business Impact of Page Speed Business Uplift Speed Speed Downlift Uplift Business Downlift Felix Gessert: Mobile Site Speed and the Impact on E-Commerce, CodeTalks 2019 So Far On Compression… GZip SDCH Deflate Delta Brotli Encoding GZIP/Deflate – The De Facto Standard in the Web Encoding Size None 200 kB Gzip ~36 kB This example text is used to show how LZ77 finds repeating elements in the example[70;14] text ~81.9% saved data J. Alakuijala, E. Kliuchnikov, Z. Szabadka, L. Vandevenne: Comparison of Brotli, Deflate, Zopfli, LZMA, LZHAM and Bzip2 Compression Algorithms, 2015 Delta Encoding – Updating Stale Content Encoding Size None 200 kB Gzip ~36 kB Delta Encoding ~34 kB 83% saved data J. C. Mogul, F. Douglis, A. Feldmann, B. Krishnamurthy: Potential Benefits of Delta Encoding and Data Compression for HTTP, 1997 SDCH – Reusing Dictionaries Encoding Size This is an example None 200 kB Gzip ~36 kB Another example Delta Encoding ~34 kB SDCH ~7 kB Up to 81% better results (compared to gzip) O. Shapira: Shared Dictionary Compression for HTTP at LinkedIn, 2015 Brotli – SDCH for Everyone Encoding Size None 200 kB Gzip ~36 kB Delta Encoding ~34 kB SDCH ~7 kB Brotli ~29 kB ~85.6% saved data J. Alakuijala, E. Kliuchnikov, Z. Szabadka, L. Vandevenne: Comparison of Brotli, Deflate, Zopfli, LZMA, LZHAM and Bzip2 Compression Algorithms, 2015 So Far On Compression… Theory vs. Reality GZip (~80%) SDCH Deflate
    [Show full text]
  • Compositional Analysis for Exposing Vulnerabilities – a Symbolic Execution Approach
    Master’s Thesis Compositional Analysis for Exposing Vulnerabilities – A Symbolic Execution Approach Thomas Hutzelmann WEBSTYLEGUIDE Institut für Software & Systems Engineering Universitätsstraße 6a D-86135 Augsburg REFERAT IIIA6 (INTERNET) Email [email protected] Servicetelefon 089 / 2180 – 9898 Mo./Di./Do./Fr. 09:00 Uhr bis 12:00 Uhr Di./Do. 14:00 Uhr bis 17:00 Uhr Master’s Thesis Compositional Analysis for Exposing Vulnerabilities – A Symbolic Execution Approach Autor: Thomas Hutzelmann Matrikelnummer: 1396618 Beginn der Arbeit: 21. Juni 2016 Abgabe der Arbeit: 21. Dezember 2016 Erstgutachter: Prof. Dr. Alexander Pretschner Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Alexander Knapp Betreuer: M.Sc. Saahil Ognawala WEBSTYLEGUIDE Institut für Software & Systems Engineering Universitätsstraße 6a D-86135 Augsburg REFERAT IIIA6 (INTERNET) Email [email protected] Servicetelefon 089 / 2180 – 9898 Mo./Di./Do./Fr. 09:00 Uhr bis 12:00 Uhr Di./Do. 14:00 Uhr bis 17:00 Uhr Hiermit versichere ich, dass ich diese Masterarbeit selbständig verfasst habe. Ich habe dazu keine anderen als die angegebenen Quellen und Hilfsmittel verwendet. Augsburg, den 21. Dezember 2016 Thomas Hutzelmann Acknowledgments I would like to express my great appreciation to Prof. Pretschner for the helpful feedback, the valuable suggestions, and his very precise critiques. I am particularly grateful for the assistance given by Prof. Knapp. No matter, what problems I was facing, he always had a sympathetic ear for me. This thesis would not have been possible without Saahil Ognawala. Our numerous discussions have sharpened my deep understanding of the topic and have led to some unique ideas. Finally, I want to express my gratitude for being part of the Software Engineering Elite Graduate Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Compression: Putting the Squeeze on Storage
    Compression: Putting the Squeeze on Storage Live Webcast September 2, 2020 11:00 am PT 1 | ©2020 Storage Networking Industry Association. All Rights Reserved. Today’s Presenters Ilker Cebeli John Kim Brian Will Moderator Chair, SNIA Networking Storage Forum Intel® QuickAssist Technology Samsung NVIDIA Software Architect Intel 2 | ©2020 Storage Networking Industry Association. All Rights Reserved. SNIA-At-A-Glance 3 3 | ©2020 Storage Networking Industry Association. All Rights Reserved. NSF Technologies 4 4 | ©2020 Storage Networking Industry Association. All Rights Reserved. SNIA Legal Notice § The material contained in this presentation is copyrighted by the SNIA unless otherwise noted. § Member companies and individual members may use this material in presentations and literature under the following conditions: § Any slide or slides used must be reproduced in their entirety without modification § The SNIA must be acknowledged as the source of any material used in the body of any document containing material from these presentations. § This presentation is a project of the SNIA. § Neither the author nor the presenter is an attorney and nothing in this presentation is intended to be, or should be construed as legal advice or an opinion of counsel. If you need legal advice or a legal opinion please contact your attorney. § The information presented herein represents the author's personal opinion and current understanding of the relevant issues involved. The author, the presenter, and the SNIA do not assume any responsibility or liability for damages arising out of any reliance on or use of this information. NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. 5 | ©2020 Storage Networking Industry Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison and Model of Compression Techniques for Smart Cloud Log File Handling
    Copyright IEEE. The final publication is available at IEEExplore via https://doi.org/10.1109/CCCI49893.2020.9256609. Comparison and Model of Compression Techniques for Smart Cloud Log File Handling Josef Spillner Zurich University of Applied Sciences Winterthur, Switzerland [email protected] Abstract—Compression as data coding technique has seen tight pricing of offered cloud services. Increasing diversity and approximately 70 years of research and practical innovation. progress in generic compression tools and log-specific algo- Nowadays, powerful compression tools with good trade-offs exist rithms [4], [5], [6] leaves many operators without a systematic for a range of file formats from plain text to rich multimedia. Yet in the dilemma of cloud providers to reduce log data sizes as much framework to choose suitable and economic log compression as possible while having to keep as much as possible around for tools and respective configurations. This prevents a systematic regulatory reasons and compliance processes, many companies solution to exploit cost tradeoffs, such as increasing investment are looking for smarter solutions beyond brute compression. into better compression levels while saving long-term storage In this paper, comprehensive applied research setting around cost. In this paper, such a framework is constructed by giving network and system logs is introduced by comparing text com- pression ratios and performance. The benchmark encompasses a comprehensive overview with benchmark results of 30 to- 13 tools and 30 tool-configuration-search combinations. The tool tal combinations of compression tools, decompression/search and algorithm relationships as well as benchmark results are tools and associated configurations. modelled in a graph.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1609.01220V1 [Cs.LO] 5 Sep 2016 Rjc,Ada 2]Pit U,Acmie U a Naiaealgua All Invalidate Can Bug Compiler a Out, Com Points Compcert [20] the As Concern
    An implementation of Deflate in Coq Christoph-Simon Senjak and Martin Hofmann {christoph.senjak,hofmann}@ifi.lmu.de Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit¨at Munich, Germany Abstract. The widely-used compression format “Deflate” is defined in RFC 1951 and is based on prefix-free codings and backreferences. There are unclear points about the way these codings are specified, and several sources for confusion in the standard. We tried to fix this problem by giv- ing a rigorous mathematical specification, which we formalized in Coq. We produced a verified implementation in Coq which achieves competi- tive performance on inputs of several megabytes. In this paper we present the several parts of our implementation: a fully verified implementation of canonical prefix-free codings, which can be used in other compression formats as well, and an elegant formalism for specifying sophisticated formats, which we used to implement both a compression and decom- pression algorithm in Coq which we formally prove inverse to each other – the first time this has been achieved to our knowledge. The compatibility to other Deflate implementations can be shown empirically. We further- more discuss some of the difficulties, specifically regarding memory and runtime requirements, and our approaches to overcome them. Keywords: Formal Verification · Program Extraction · Compression · Coq 1 Introduction It is more and more recognized that traditional methods for maintenance of soft- ware security reach their limits, and different approaches become inevitable [3]. At the same time, formal program verification has reached a state where it be- arXiv:1609.01220v1 [cs.LO] 5 Sep 2016 comes realistic to prove correctness of low-level system components and combine them to prove the correctness of larger systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences
    Empirical Study on Effects of Compression Algorithms in Web Environment Lukáš Čegan1 1University of Pardubice, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, Department of Information Technology, Pardubice, Czech Republic Web resource compression is one of the most useful tools, which is utilized to accelerate website performance. Compressed resources take less time to transfer from server to client. This leads to faster rendering of web page content resulting in a positive impact on the user experience. However, content compression is time consuming and also brings extra demands on system resources. For these reasons, it is necessary to know how to choose a suitable algorithm in relation to particular web content. In this paper we present an empirical study on effects of the compression algorithms which are used in web environment. This study covers Gzip, Zopfi and Brotli compression algorithms and provides their performance comparison. Keywords: Compression, Website, Gzip, Zopfi, Brotli. 1. INTRODUCTION big compression ratio, but they are slow. However, it may not be a hindrance for static content, because it can be Today’s web users are not very patient. They expected easily preprocessed and deployed to the web server. But delivery content from web servers to their devices in a flash. this practice is definitely inapplicable for dynamic Therefore, web developers, UX designers, software generated content because it is created on-the-fly, on the architects, network experts and many others care about server side. For this reasons it is necessary to have a deep many optimization technics and appropriate solutions that knowledge of the performance data of different algorithms help them to delivery whole web content to the client as in different kinds of deployment.
    [Show full text]
  • I Came to Drop Bombs Auditing the Compression Algorithm Weapons Cache
    I Came to Drop Bombs Auditing the Compression Algorithm Weapons Cache Cara Marie NCC Group Blackhat USA 2016 About Me • NCC Group Senior Security Consultant Pentested numerous networks, web applications, mobile applications, etc. • Hackbright Graduate • Ticket scalper in a previous life • @bones_codes | [email protected] What is a Decompression Bomb? A decompression bomb is a file designed to crash or render useless the program or system reading it. Vulnerable Vectors • Chat clients • Image hosting • Web browsers • Web servers • Everyday web-services software • Everyday client software • Embedded devices (especially vulnerable due to weak hardware) • Embedded documents • Gzip’d log uploads A History Lesson early 90’s • ARC/LZH/ZIP/RAR bombs were used to DoS FidoNet systems 2002 • Paul L. Daniels publishes Arbomb (Archive “Bomb” detection utility) 2003 • Posting by Steve Wray on FullDisclosure about a bzip2 bomb antivirus software DoS 2004 • AERAsec Network Services and Security publishes research on the various reactions of antivirus software against decompression bombs, includes a comparison chart 2014 • Several CVEs for PIL are issued — first release July 2010 (CVE-2014-3589, CVE-2014-3598, CVE-2014-9601) 2015 • CVE for libpng — first release Aug 2004 (CVE-2015-8126) Why Are We Still Talking About This?!? Why Are We Still Talking About This?!? Compression is the New Hotness Who This Is For Who This Is For The Archives An archive bomb, a.k.a. zip bomb, is often employed to disable antivirus software, in order to create an opening for more traditional viruses • Singly compressed large file • Self-reproducing compressed files, i.e. Russ Cox’s Zips All The Way Down • Nested compressed files, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Brotli, Deflate, Zopfli, LZMA, LZHAM and Bzip2 Compression Algorithms
    Comparison of Brotli, Deflate, Zopfli, LZMA, LZHAM and Bzip2 Compression Algorithms Jyrki Alakuijala, Evgenii Kliuchnikov, Zoltan Szabadka, and Lode Vandevenne Google, Inc. Abstract—​This paper compares six compression techniques, and based on the results proposes that brotli could be used as a replacement of the common deflate algorithm. We compared the performance of brotli by measuring the compression ratio and speed, as well as decompression speed on three different corpora: the Canterbury compression corpus, an ad hoc crawled web content corpus, and enwik8. On all three corpora we show performance superior to that of deflate. Further, we show that Zopfli, LZMA, LZHAM and bzip2 use significantly more CPU time for either compression or decompression and could not always work as direct replacements of deflate. Introduction Much of the practical lossless data compression is done with the deflate algorithm, not only because it is well supported by existing systems, but also because it is relatively simple and fast to encode and decode. In 2013 we launched Zopfli ​[1]​, a compression algorithm that allows for denser compression while remaining compatible with the deflate format. While Zopfli is now well­accepted in the field, there were opinions expressed that we should move on from the deflate file format to a modern solution. Brotli ​[2]​ is our attempt at building a compression format and an example implementation of this format that is fundamentally more efficient than deflate. In this paper we measure the performance of our implementation and compare it with deflate and a few other compression algorithms. Methods The tests were run with a 22 bit window size for brotli, LZMA and LZHAM, and a 15 bit window size for deflate and zopfli.
    [Show full text]