DOCSLIB.ORG

Energy-Efficient Product Procurement for Federal Agencies (Brochure)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Energy-Efficient Product Procurement for Federal Agencies (Brochure) FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Energy-Efficient Product Procurement for Federal Agencies The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) supports Federal agencies in identifying energy- and water-efficient products that meet Federal acquisi- tion requirements, conserve energy, save taxpayer dollars, and reduce environmental impacts. This is achieved through technical assistance, guidance, FEMP helps Federal agencies evaluate energy-consuming products to select the most and efficiency requirements for energy- efficient, life-cycle cost effective options.Photo credit: iStock 11881809 efficient, water-efficient, and low standby power products. • EPAct 2005 mandates Federal agen- DOE and the U.S. Environmental cies to incorporate energy efficiency Protection Agency (EPA) sponsor four Federal Mandates criteria into relevant contracts and programs with the authority to identify Recognizing the benefits of energy-effi- specifications. appropriate product types and set cient products, Congress and multiple performance levels according to these Presidents passed several laws and • The Energy Independence and requirements. These programs include regulations mandating their purchase Security Act (EISA) of 2007 [amend- FEMP-designated products, ENERGY by Federal agencies, including: ing NECPA Section 8259b], E.O. STAR, low standby power products, 13423, and E.O. 13221 require and WaterSense labeled products. A • The Energy Policy Act (EPAct) of Federal agencies to purchase energy- 2005 [amending the National Energy complete list of product types along consuming products with a low with additional resources are outlined Conservation Policy Act (NECPA) standby power level of 1 watt or less. Section 8259b] and Executive Order in this publication. (E.O.) 13423 both require Federal • E.O. 13514 requires 95 percent of Covered Product Categories agencies to purchase energy-con- new contract actions, task orders, suming products that are ENERGY and delivery orders for products Federal regulations (10 CFR 436) STAR® qualified or meet FEMP- and services to be energy efficient, state that the above mandates apply designated efficiency requirements. water efficient, bio-based, envi- to only energy-consuming products ronmentally preferable [Electronic within a product category covered by Product Environmental Assessment ENERGY STAR or FEMP. Other In this Document Tool (EPEAT) certified], non-ozone energy-consuming product categories • Federal Mandates depleting, contain recycled content, do not have to meet these mandates, • Covered Product Categories or non-toxic or less toxic alternatives in which case agencies may use any • Exceptions where such products meet agency products that meet their needs. A list of • Impacts of Energy-Efficient covered product categories is provided Product Procurement performance requirements. later in this document. Agencies should • Efficiency Requirements These procurement requirements are carefully check program criteria for • FEMP-Designated Products • ENERGY STAR Qualified codified in the Federal Acquisition exclusions. Products Regulations (FAR) Part 23. FAR Part • Low Standby Power Products 23 also requires agencies to include Exceptions • WaterSense Labeled Products a clause from FAR Part 52.223-15 in EPAct 2005 Section 104(c) lists pro- • Available FEMP Assistance all contracts and solicitations when curement exceptions also listed in FAR • Online Resources Part 23.204. “An agency is not required • Additional Resources acquiring or specifying energy-consum- ing products. to procure an ENERGY STAR or 2 FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FEMP-designated product if the head impact Federal agencies have on the Guidance for of the agency determines in writing environment. Manufacturers and that: Vendors Water efficiency is also an integral a) No ENERGY STAR or FEMP- part of a comprehensive resource FEMP designates product efficiency designated product is reasonably management plan. Due to prolonged requirements and not specific available that meets the functional droughts and increasing demand, water products. Only products meeting requirements of the agency; or is becoming scarcer for several Federal program-referenced testing procedures facilities across the U.S. Water also may be characterized as meeting FEMP b) No ENERGY STAR or FEMP- efficiency requirements. Manufacturers requires significant amounts of energy designated product is cost effective for treatment and delivery. Using are encouraged to attain verification over the life of the product taking from an independent third party. water-efficient products helps agencies energy cost savings into account.” meet reduction goals, ensure adequate Manufacturers should characterize Impacts of Energy- water supplies, and save energy. products as “meeting FEMP-designated Efficient Product Institutionalize Change: The Federal efficiency requirements” and not as a Procurement Government is the largest buyer of “FEMP-designated product.” All energy and water consuming products. manufacturers are strongly encouraged Federal acquisition of energy-efficient By setting high performance standards to accompany such claims with a link to products can save energy, save money, for these products, Federal procure- the appropriate FEMP website reduce environmental impacts, and ment requirements can institutionalize reference. For example: institutionalize change. change and potentially shift entire mar- kets to a greater level of efficiency. This This product meets FEMP-designated Energy Savings: EISA 2007 requires increases the availability of energy- and efficiency requirements for PRODUCT Federal agencies to reduce energy con- water-efficient products and reduces CATEGORY, placing it in the top 25 sumption intensity each year compared costs for all consumers. percent of equivalent products for to a fiscal year (FY) 2003 baseline. energy efficiency. Visitwww.femp. Purchasing energy-efficient products is energy.gov/procurement for more often a cost-effective energy conserva- Purchasing Specifications information. tion measure (ECM) to help agencies DOE and the U.S. Environmental meet this mandate. Guidance for Federal Protection Agency (EPA) sponsor four Procurement Officers Cost Savings: Federal purchasers programs with the authority to identify may assume that products meeting covered product categories and set FEMP designates efficiency efficiency levels: requirements for product categories, ENERGY STAR and FEMP- but not specific products. To determine designated efficiency requirements are • FEMP-designated products life-cycle cost effective. In this context, if a product meets FEMP-designated • ENERGY STAR efficiency requirements, compare life-cycle cost effective means the manufacturer efficiency data to the operating cost savings for an energy- • Low standby power products FEMP efficiency requirements. It is then efficient product during its functional • WaterSense labeled products recommended that agencies ensure the lifetime is equal to or greater than FEMP designates efficiency require- required test procedure has be used any additional costs at the time of ments within covered product catego- and performed/verified by an purchase. Identifying, purchasing, ries that offer significant energy savings independent third party. and properly installing these products for the Federal Government. ENERGY in Federal facilities results in reduced STAR and WaterSense aim for signifi- Find energy-efficient product energy and water consumption and life- cant savings on a national basis and requirements and test procedures on cycle cost savings. Due to their higher tend to focus on consumer products. the FEMP website at return on investment (ROI), efficient Different from ENERGY STAR and www.femp.energy.gov/procurement. products cost Federal agencies less to WaterSense, FEMP does not designate operate, saving taxpayer dollars. or label specific products. Reduced Environmental Impact: The A complete list of covered product combustion of fossil fuels to generate categories and additional resources are energy emits greenhouse gas emissions, provided later in this document. such as carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (NOX), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). Procuring energy-efficient products decreases energy usage and its result- ing pollutant emissions, lessening the FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 3 FEMP-Designated Product The final step is for FEMP to verify power data information in the FEMP that products meeting the top 25 per- Standby Power Data Center. This Categories cent requirement are available from online resource lists products and FEMP product efficiency requirements three or more sources. In most cases, their standby power usage. Additional set minimum efficiency levels for prod- Federal purchasers are required to information is available at www.femp. uct categories that have the potential consider multiple sources when justify- energy.gov/standby. to generate significant Federal energy ing a purchase. WaterSense Labeled Products savings. When a product type has successfully WaterSense is an EPA-sponsored part- Federal agencies use a wide variety completed this process, FEMP issues nership program that promotes water of energy-consuming products. efficiency requirements and guidelines efficiency and enhances the market for While many are covered by the that encourage Federal agency acquisi- water-efficient products, programs, and ENERGY STAR program, some are tion and use. practices. Products not. Congress authorized FEMP to carrying the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Carbon Emissions MANAGEMENT PLAN
    Carbon Emissions MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared for SWACO February 2020 prepared by Contents Section 1.0 Introduction .........................................................1 A Changing Climate . .. 1 SWACO’s Commitment . 2 Using this Plan . 2 Section 2.0 Carbon Footprint Evaluation .......................................3 Footprint Definition . 3 Methodology . 3 Monitoring . 4 Section 3.0 Benchmarking ..............................................5 Section 4.0 Goal Setting ..............................................6 Methodology . 6 Organization-wide Goal . 6 Section 5.0 Implementing .........................................7 Landfill Gas Emissions Management . 7 Vehicle and Equipment Fuel Management . 8 Building Energy Management . 8 Waste Management . 8 Section 6.0 Future Considerations ............................9 Appendices Appendix A: Benchmarking Assessment . 11 Appendix B: Carbon Management Strategic Initiatives Matrix . 15 Appendix C: Strategic Initiative Decision Trees . 17 Photo Caption LIST OF ACRONYMS CH4 GWP SBTI Methane Global Warming Science-Based Potential Target Initiative CO2 IPCC SWACO Carbon Dioxide Intergovernmental Solid Waste Authority Panel on Climate of Central Ohio Control CO2e N2O Carbon Dioxide Nitrous Oxide Equivalent Introduction SECTION 1.0 Introduction A CHANGING CLIMATE In the atmosphere, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane above 1.5°C (2.7°F) will result in increasingly significant (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and certain fluorinated impacts of climate change. To limit the increase to gases, collectively referred
    [Show full text]
  • A Citizen's Guide to BOEM's Renewable Energy Authorization Process
    A Citizen’s Guide TO THE BUREAU OF OCEAN ENERGY MANAGEMENT’S RENEWABLE ENERGY AUTHORIZATION PROCESS December 2016 Overview This guide is intended to help the public understand the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s (BOEM) process for overseeing renewable energy projects on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) and to highlight opportunities for public involvement. About BOEM BOEM is the Bureau within the U.S. Department of the Interior responsible for managing development of the nation’s offshore energy resources in an environmentally and economically responsible way. BOEM promotes energy independence, environmental protection, and economic development through responsible, science-informed management of offshore energy resources. Introduction The United States is experiencing increased interest in the development of marine energy projects using wind, wave, and ocean current technologies. These types of renewable energy sources can provide densely populated coastal communities with a clean source of electrical power while helping to diversify the U.S. electrical supply. For additional information on offshore renewable energy technology, see BOEM’s “Offshore Renewable Energy Guide” at http://www.boem.gov/Offshore- Renewable-Energy-Guide/. In 2016, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) estimated 10,800 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind energy could be accessed within the 200 nautical miles (nm) Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) boundary. DOE estimates offshore wind energy capacity recoverable given current technical capabilities to be 2,058 GW, with an energy generation potential almost double the electricity consumption of the United States. 2 | A Citizen’s Guide to the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management’s Renewable Energy Authorization Process BOEM’s Regulatory Authority for Renewable Energy Activities BOEM is the federal agency responsible for issuing leases, easements, and rights-of-way for renewable energy projects on the OCS.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Power for a Clean Energy Future
    WATERWIND & POWER WATER PROGRAM POWER PROGRAM WATER POWER FOR A CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE March 2016 WATER POWER PROGRAM Building a Clean Energy Economy Leading the world in clean energy is critical to strengthening the American economy. Targeted investments in clean en- ergy research and development jumpstart private sector innovation critical to our long-term economic growth, energy security, and international competitiveness. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Water Power Program (the Pro- gram) is strengthening the nation’s global position by funding cutting-edge research to produce the next generation of hydropower and marine and hydrokinetic (MHK) technologies, and by accelerating the development of markets for those technologies. Currently, the hydropower industry employs 200,000–300,000 workers in the United States, making it not only the longest-running, but also the largest renewable electricity production workforce in the nation. However, there has been a lack of consistent hydropower educational programs in the United States. In an effort to increase our nation’s knowledge and skills in this area, the Program has sponsored new graduate research opportunities to train the next generation of hydropower specialists and engineers. The newly emerging MHK industry holds tremendous potential for job growth as MHK technologies progress to- wards commercial readiness. The Program invests in fellowships that fund graduate-level training and sends U.S. researchers to advanced European research facilities to establish partnerships, boost innovation, and facilitate knowledge sharing. By capitalizing on water power’s significant potential for sustainable growth, the United States can add thousands of clean energy jobs while building a sustainable, renewable energy future.
    [Show full text]
  • Deloitte Resources 2017 Study Energy Management: Sustainability and Progress Contents
    Deloitte Resources 2017 Study Energy management: Sustainability and progress Contents About the study 3 Executive summary 5 Residential consumer views on energy management 7 Detailed residential consumer findings 8 Business views on energy management 25 Detailed business findings 26 Concluding thoughts 46 Endnotes 49 Contacts 50 2 About the study Deloitte1, with strategy and market research firm Harrison The 2017 Study was conducted in March 2017, and thus, Group, a YouGov company, has completed its seventh largely reflects attitudes and practices related to the annual nationwide Resources Study (the “2017 Study” or year 2016. The Study captures two views: a residential “Study”) to provide insights that can be useful in helping consumer perspective and a business perspective. The energy companies and businesses make energy-related residential consumer portion is based on more than 1,500 investment and business decisions. The Study aims to demographically balanced online interviews with household answer questions such as: decision-makers for utility services. The business portion of the Study is based on more than 700 online interviews • What are US residential consumers and businesses with business decision-makers responsible for energy doing to manage their energy usage? management practices at companies with more than • Which energy issues matter most to them? 250 employees across all industries. To facilitate in-depth • What motivates them to reduce their energy analysis, business survey respondents are segmented consumption and what would impel them to take by industry sector and company size. Please see Figure 1 additional action? and Figure 2 for definitions of these segments. In addition, Deloitte interviewed several subject matter specialists and/ • Are they receptive to clean technologies? or providers of energy management products and services • How can electricity suppliers and energy service in order to obtain greater context and potential clarity providers better meet their needs? around key business findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Management and Optimization
    Energy Management and Optimization Keith Masters Business Manager, Pulp and Paper Systems, ABB Westerville, OH Abstract Energy Management and Optimization solutions can help reduce energy costs while improving mill operational performance. Real time data from process monitoring systems, automation systems and production planning systems is used for planning and scheduling to help optimize energy use, procurement and generation. This mill information coupled with the price and energy availability information from energy providers/market is used to calculate optimal production and power generation plan, and to get the best price for the energy you require. Reporting tools provide energy consumption, costs and efficiency monitoring. Introduction There are many different ways to implement Energy Management and Optimization. This paper will describe a computer software program that includes planning and scheduling tools to help optimize energy use and supply, energy balance management tools to help energy procurement at the best price, and reporting tools to help monitor energy consumption, costs, efficiency and other energy-related information. The program is based on real time data from process monitoring systems, automation systems, production planning systems coupled with the price and energy availability information from energy providers/market. The continued rise in energy prices puts a squeeze on margin and profits. Margin ? Energy Cost Figure 1 Energy costs impact on margin In order to maintain margin, energy cost must be managed.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Energy Management Best Practices
    COMMUNITY ENERGY MANAGEMENT - BEST PRACTICES Community Energy Management Best Practices Index Program Overview Best Practice One: Community Plans and Public Outreach 1.1 Energy Plan 1.2 Public Participation Best Practice Two: Zoning Regulations 2.1 Zoning Regulations Best Practice Three: Project Review Process 3.1 Project Review Policy and Procedures 3.2 Guide to Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Projects Best Practice Four: Recruitment and Education 4.1 Recruitment and Orientation 4.2 Education and Training Best Practice Five: Clean Energy Communities 5.1 Clean Energy Sites 5.2 Community Energy Management Best Practice Six: Community Prosperity 6.1 Economic Development Strategy 6.2 Marketing and Promotion Glossary Acknowledgements COMMUNITY ENERGY MANAGEMENT - BEST PRACTICES Program Overview Local governments across Michigan struggle with economic constraints and seek tools to secure their financial health and identify sources of stable on-going funding for their critical services. Energy costs for the operation of municipal buildings and infrastructure are a rising expense for communities. Fortunately, energy costs also represent one of the easiest places where cost savings can be realized. However, local governments frequently lack the technical expertise and staff capacity to pursue those savings. Even when staff members are interested in pursuing energy savings, determining where the necessary information is and how to prioritize improvements is an ongoing challenge. This is where the services of a Community Energy Manager (CEM)
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Energy Management: Background and Issues for Congress
    Department of Defense Energy Management: Background and Issues for Congress Heather L. Greenley Analyst in Energy Policy July 25, 2019 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45832 SUMMARY R45832 Department of Defense Energy Management: July 25, 2019 Background and Issues for Congress Heather L. Greenley The U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) consumes more energy than any other federal agency— Analyst in Energy Policy 77% of the entire federal government’s energy consumption. Energy management is integral to [email protected] DOD operations. From running bases and training facilities to powering jets and ships, DOD relies on energy to maintain readiness and resiliency for mission operations. Energy efficiency— For a copy of the full report, providing the same or an improved level of service with less energy—over time can reduce please call 7-5700 or visit agency expenses, particularly at an agency like DOD, where energy represents roughly 2% of the www.crs.gov. department’s annual budget. Since the 1970s, Congress mandated energy requirements for federal agencies. Legislation required reductions in fossil fuel consumption and increases in renewable energy use and efficiency targets for government fleets and buildings. The National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NECPA, P.L. 95-619) requires federal agencies to report annually on energy management activities. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct05, P.L. 109-58) and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA, P.L. 110-140) amended and addressed additional energy management targets for the federal government. As the largest energy consumer in the federal government, DOD drives total federal energy management goal achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Mitigation: Application of Management Production Philosophies for Energy Saving in Industrial Processes
    sustainability Article Climate Change Mitigation: Application of Management Production Philosophies for Energy Saving in Industrial Processes Angels Niñerola 1,* , Ramon Ferrer-Rullan 2 and Antoni Vidal-Suñé 1 1 Business Management Department, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43204 Reus, Spain; [email protected] 2 Ferrer & Asociados, 43202 Reus, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 29 December 2019; Accepted: 13 January 2020; Published: 19 January 2020 Abstract: Climate change is a fact. Global warming of the planet is a result of the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere and the cause of serious sustainability issues. The objective of this article is to highlight the potential of the Six Sigma methodology to reduce energy consumption in the productive sphere, with consequential reductions in pollutant emissions. We present a systematic literature review that highlights the increasing interest from academics and practitioners in using quality management philosophies for addressing sustainability issues. From the analysis carried out, it is clear that Lean is being used in this regard but the potential of Six Sigma is not being exploited. Taking advantage of the best of both approaches (Lean Six Sigma) can contribute to reducing energy consumption in industrial processes and contribute to mitigating the impacts of those processes on climate change. Moreover, through keyword analysis, we found that the three dimensions of sustainability are currently gaining importance in the literature, when previously only the economic pillar was relevant. Finally, we raise some questions for reflection for academics but also for practitioners, as the problem is a global problem that should be faced by all the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Developing an Energy Management Plan
    Rhode Island Infrastructure Bank Efficient Buildings Fund Guidance on Developing an Energy Management Plan For the purposes of the Efficient Buildings Fund (EBF) application, an energy management plan (EMP) is a broad-reaching document that serves as a long-term planning resource and is used by an entity to drive and guide progress toward a more secure, cost-effective and sustainable energy future. An EMP submitted as part of the EBF must include, at a minimum, an energy reduction goal and an implementation plan to achieve that goal. Energy Reduction Goal: Performance goals drive energy management activities and promote continuous improvement. Setting clear and measurable goals is critical for understanding intended results, developing effective strategies, and reaping financial gains. An energy reduction goal is a statement that guides decision-making. The energy reduction goal should be expressed as a percent reduction in energy usage of all facilities under the entity’s control below a baseline year(s) by a certain year in the future. Refer to EPA Energy Star’s Guidelines for Energy Management for help with goal- setting. Implementation Plan: The implementation plan should outline steps that the applicant will take over the next few years to more thoroughly assess opportunities, implement energy efficiency projects and achieve its energy reduction goals. This piece of the EMP should combine findings from the baseline analysis with what is known about the condition and operations of the facilities (based on recent energy audits and/or anecdotal information) to identify potential opportunities for energy savings. The plan might also include the projects proposed in this application, noting how far they will go toward achieving the entity’s energy reduction goal and using the project proposal to outline what resources may be needed (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Impacts on Energy Systems Key Issues for Energy Sector Adaptation
    Climate Impacts on Energy Systems Key issues for energy sector adaptation Executive Summary Acknowledgements This Paper was prepared by a core team led by Jane Ebinger at the Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP) and Walter Vergara, heading the World Bank Group’s Global Expert Team for Adaptation who both edited this Paper with Irene Leino. The team is grateful for contributions from a range of authors engaged in research and analysis of climate change, development and energy issues (below in alphabetical order). It was conducted under the general guidance of Amarquaye Armar, followed by Istvan Dobozi and Rohit Khanna in the role of Program Manager for ESMAP and benefited from peer review by Jonathan Coony, Marcelino Madrigal and Alejandro Deeb. The team was assisted by Irene Leino, Oeyvind Lier and Vanessa Lopes. Contributing Authors Alberto Ansuategi is an Associate Researcher at the Basque Center for Climate Change and Associate Professor of Economics in the Department of Fundamental Economic Analysis at UPV/EHU. He holds a D.Phil in Environmental Economics from the University of York. Andre Frossard Pereira de Lucena is a Post-doctoral Fellow for the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). He holds a Ph.D. in Energy Planning from the Federal University of Rio de Janerio. Mohammed Sadeck Boulahya is the Regional Adviser for Africa in Climate for Development “ClimDevConsult, Africa” with 30 years experience in capacity development. He holds a Research Certificate in Agro-meteorology and drought risk management in semi arid regions from CSIRO, Division of Atmospheric Physics (Melbourne, Australia). He graduated from the WMO Regional Research and Training Institute in Hydro-Meteorology (IHFR-Oran, Algeria), and holds a Masters degree in Mathematics and Physics from the University of Algiers (1970).
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Management Services: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
    Energy Management Services: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS 1. What is Energy Management Services? Energy Management Services (EMS), defined in section three of M.G.L. 25A, is a type of Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC) that provides a performance guarantee from the company that installs the equipment. EMS is an alternative public procurement method used to purchase energy conservation measures, energy efficiency measures, and water conservation measures. 2. What is the maximum term for an Energy Management Services Agreement (EMSA)? The maximum term for an EMS contract is 20 years. 3. What is an Energy Service Company or ESCO? An Energy Service Company (known as an ESCO) is a firm that coordinates all of the activities of an EMS project, including: technical audits, design, engineering, equipment installation, construction management, staff training, equipment maintenance, and project monitoring. ESCOs must be DCAMM certified. A list of certified ESCOs is available online. For more information on DCAMM certification, awarding authorities should refer to DCAMM’s Certification Guidelines and Procedures for Prime Contractors and Awarding Authorities <http://www.mass.gov/anf/docs/DCAMM/dlforms/certification/cr- certguideproc-gc-aa-2008-12-04.pdf>. 4. Why should I consider EMS contracting instead of a regular construction project? You may want to consider EMS contracting to reduce your energy bills and obtain new capital equipment with little or no up-front capital investment. Most public agencies consider EMS contracting when they have identified energy and water conservation potential in their buildings but do not have sufficient funding to make the improvements. In addition, EMS contracting offers significant benefits that are not usually associated with standard construction projects, such as a performance guarantee or staff training for preventative maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Program Overview, Federal Energy Management Program
    New version/vector logo/and vector type New version/bitmap logo/and outline type Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Prepared by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Reversed White Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy FEDERAL ENERGY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The Department of Energy’s (DOE) Federal Energy Management Program (FEMP) Energy Efficiency & provides agencies with information, guidance, and assistance in using renewable Renewable Energy energy. This directly supports FEMP’s mission to facilitate the Federal Government’s implementation of sound, cost-effective energy management and investment practices to enhance the nation’s energy security and environmental stewardship. RENEWABLE ENERGY PROGRAM OVERVIEW Federal agencies meet regulatory requirements and goals, increase national security, conserve natural resources, and create jobs by using renewable energy to deliver electricity, heating, cooling, and other energy applications. PIX 16698 Federal Goals and Requirements including increasing agency use of renewable energy and implementing
    [Show full text]