Shades of the Enlightenment! How the Neo–Deist ‘Intelligent Design Movement’ Recycles the Enlightenment’s Methodology of ‘Reason’ as a Humanistic Substitute for Biblical Creationism’s Revelation–verified Epistemology by James J. S. Johnson Th.D., D.C.Ed. Master Faculty, LeTourneau University; Adjunct Faculty, Dallas Christian College
[email protected] for presentation to the EVANGELICAL THEOLOGICAL SOCIETY Southwest Regional Meeting, March 24th, A.D. 2007, 9 a.m., at the Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Fort Worth, Texas ABSTRACT: This paper focuses on the epistemological similarities (and dissimilarities) of today’s "Intelligent Design Movement" and the Deism–oriented Enlightenment of the late 1700s. The controversy of origins, which largely focuses on Creation doctrine, is theologically foundational to Biblical Christianity, because the God of the Bible, from the Bible’s very first verse, has primarily defined Himself as the Creator. But the study of origins involves more than Biblical theology, because it also involves natural revelation, as Paul indicates in Romans chapter one. Accordingly, how Christians treat the doctrine of Creation is affected by their interrelated understandings of Who God is, of how He communicates, of how to interpret His Bible, of how to interpret His natural revelation, etc. During most of the latter half of the 20th century, the Christian community faced three major options regarding what to believe about cosmic and human origins: (1) the secular version of evolution; (2) several varieties of "theistic evolution" - 1 - (theories postulating that God "used evolution" to make His creation); and (3) a religious (and typically Bible-argued) version of young-earth creationism ("YEC"), which frontally rejected all evolutionary concepts, elements, and compromises.