DOCSLIB.ORG

An Analysis of the Creation Museum : Hermeneutics, Language, and Information Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Analysis of the Creation Museum : Hermeneutics, Language, and Information Theory University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 5-2014 An analysis of the Creation Museum : hermeneutics, language, and information theory. Steven Mark Watkins University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Watkins, Steven Mark, "An analysis of the Creation Museum : hermeneutics, language, and information theory." (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1536. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/1536 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The nivU ersity of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The nivU ersity of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ANALYSIS OF THE CREATION MUSEUM: HERMENEUTICS, LANGUAGE, AND INFORMATION THEORY By Steven Mark Watkins B.A., Northern Kentucky University, 1996 M.Div., The Master’s Seminary, 2000 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Humanities University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky May 2014 Copyright 2014 by Steven Mark Watkins All rights reserved AN ANALYSIS OF THE CREATION MUSEUM: HERMENEUTICS, LANGUAGE, AND INFORMATION THEORY By Steven Mark Watkins B.A., Northern Kentucky University, 1996 M.Div., The Master’s Seminary, 2000 A Dissertation Approved on March 21, 2014 by the following Dissertation Committee: ___________________________________ Dissertation Director Mary Ann Stenger ___________________________________ Tatjana Soldat-Jaffe ___________________________________ Osborne Wiggins ___________________________________ James Bielo ii DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my wife Andrea Susanne Watkins without whose support this dissertation would never have happened. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to express my deepest gratitude and thanks to my mentor and professor, Mary Ann Stenger, for her confidence in me and her continual guidance to shape me into a better scholar. I would also like to express heartfelt thanks to my committee members at the University of Louisville, Tatjana Soldat-Jaffe and Osborne Wiggins—I cannot imagine a better, more supportive, or smarter committee anywhere. I owe a deep thanks to my outside reader, James S. Bielo, of Miami University (Ohio) for his mentorship as well as his friendship—thanks too, James, for teaching me so much about ethnography. While these four scholars have improved this dissertation vastly, I remain solely responsible for any errors or inaccuracies that this work might contain. Thanks to Tim Gombis for his loyal friendship and faith in me. I would also like to thank a list of scholars who have helped and shaped me in profound ways: David Aaron, John Alberti, Annette Allen, Pamela Beattie, Doug Hume, Denis O. Lamoureux, David E. Long, Elizabeth Patton, Pat Pranke, Mark C. Taylor, Bill and Sue Trollinger, Amy Tudor, David Vinson, Julie Marie Wade, Lindsey Walters, Mark Williams, and Elaine O. Wise. Special thanks to Renee Culver, Angie Griffin, James Leary, Lynda Mercer, Carol Stewart, Katherine Wagner, and Ben Wilt. Dr. And Mrs. Jim Ramage have supported and helped our family in so many ways that I cannot imagine completing this task without them. My parents, Ed and Judy Watkins, have been a source of inspiration in so many ways by their constant demonstration of love for me. I saved the most important iv expression of thanks for last—thank you with all my heart, Andrea, for your ceaseless love and encouragement. I hope my dissertation, in some small way, measures up to yours. v ABSTRACT AN ANALYSIS OF THE CREATION MUSEUM: HERMENEUTICS, LANGUAGE, AND INFORMATION THEORY Steven M. Watkins March 21, 2014 This dissertation analyzes the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky with respect to hermeneutic, linguistic, and information theories. The popularity of the CM, with an excess of 1.6 million visitors to date and future plans to build a one-hundred million dollar theme park, raises concerns among religious and non-religious people. The CM has drawn the attention of all the major news networks and has been reported on extensively in print media. The number of visitors and money raised by the CM dwarfs other museums in the area with large federal endowments. This dissertation draws the interest of popular educated audiences as well as scholars. The dissertation is divided into five main chapters. Chapter I surveys the relevant literature on creationism in the United States. Chapter II defines the use of three theoretical fields—hermeneutics, linguistics, and information theory—to analyze the operational logic of the CM. Chapter III uses aspects of Hans-Georg Gadamer’s ideas of interpretive horizons to demonstrate how the CM justifies a selective and literal interpretation of Genesis 1. Chapter IV applies Norman Fairclough’s theory of Critical Language Study (CLS) to the various structures that project an authoritative form of discourse at the CM. Chapter V uses theories put forth by Mark C. Taylor to explain how vi information is processed in terms of screening—a phenomenon that seeks to reify an ancient myth. Taylor’s definition of religion as a complex adaptive network also illustrates why science is such a threat to the CM and why efforts are made to redefine science. The primary sources of evidence used include museum exhibits, literature published by the CM, videos, and ethnographic interviews. The interviews are semi- structured and allow for clarification and elaboration. The central conclusion is that the CM is a fundamentalist organization that rigorously maintains biblical inerrancy as an interpretive principle. Moreover, it employs a closed hermeneutic approach that I have identified as “concordism.” Authority is established through a discursive use of academic frames (contexts) and scripts (individual roles). The CM also displays certain features of complex adaptive networks as it reacts to a wider set of epistemological domains. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE DEDICATION ……………………………………………………………………….…..iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ……………………………………………………………...iv ABTRACT ……………………………………………………………………………….vi INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………..1 CHAPTER I REVIEW OF LITERATURE …………………………………………………………….9 CHAPTER II THEORIES PERTAINING TO AN ANALYSIS OF THE CREATION MUSEUM ……………………………………………………….32 CHAPTER III THE CONSTRUCTED NARRATIVE: THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL BASE AND A MODERN INTERPRETIVE HORIZON ……………………………………...83 CHAPTER IV EVIL EXPLAINED: THE CAUSE AND SOLUTION TO CORRUPTION …………134 CHAPTER V SCIENCE REDEFINED: WHY A MUSEUM ………………………………………..184 CONCLUSION ………………………………………………………………………...227 REFERENCES ………………………………………………………………………...243 APPENDIX …………………………………………………………………………….273 CURRICULUM VITAE ……………………………………………………………….304 viii INTRODUCTION The central thesis for my dissertation proposal is that the Creation Museum (CM) offers a fundamentalist interpretation of the Bible which purports to be a corrective to various social problems of modern society. This main hypothesis gives rise to several key premises for research: first, the CM taps into societal anxiety through the presentation of images such as natural disasters, starvation, drug abuse, and other pejorative aspects of the world. Second, these ills are then connected to human sinfulness as portrayed in a literalistic account of human transgression in the Garden of Eden. Having eaten the forbidden fruit, Adam and Eve doomed humanity to all forms of evil on earth—physical and moral. Third, the corrective for transforming the world is to be found in applying a literal interpretation of the Bible and thus recovering a more “godly” society and world. Fundamentalism formed in the early twentieth century as a reactionary movement against modernist, biblical criticism. As a North American Protestant movement, early fundamentalists were reacting to what they perceived as an attack by biblical critics on the Bible. The primary focus in early fundamentalist writing dealt predominantly with the rejection of higher biblical criticism, the divinity of Christ (including the miraculous conception, physical resurrection, and miracles), and the inerrancy and inspiration of the Old and New Testaments.1 However, the specific issues that fundamentalists oppose have varied through the years. The single theological issue which has remained constant for 1 The title of the four volume original work which deals with the specific issues mentioned above, became the term that would stand for the movement itself—The Fundamentals. R. A. Torrey and A. C. Dixon et. al. eds. The Fundamentals: A Testimony to the Truth. Vols. I and II. (Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 1917 [Reprint 2008]). 1 fundamentalists has been a rigorous defense of biblical inerrancy. Other moral, social, scientific, and theological issues have varied. My study of fundamentalist cultures has yielded the following definition that I will use throughout this project: “Fundamentalism is a reactive religious movement that seeks to establish a pure religious order of society through born-again conversion/salvation. The inerrancy of the Old and New Testaments (not including the Apocryphal writings)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reflections on a Young Earth Creationist' Approach to Scientific
    Reflections on a Young Earth Creationist’ Approach to Scientific Apologetics JUNE 15, 2015 BY JOEL DUFF A few weeks ago I was a scheduled to present several lectures as part of a course offered by Veritas Theological Seminary in Santa Ana, California. The course title was Scientific Apologetics: The Age of the Earth. The course was split 50/50 between speakers from Solid Rock Lectures including myself, and two prominent employees of Answers in Genesis. However, just hours before I was to present I was informed by the seminary president that I would not be allowed to speak. I had spent the previous two evenings listening to 11 hours of presentations by the AiG speakers and was prepared to respond to that material in addition to pulling together the strands of thought begun by my colleagues earlier in the week. Though I was thwarted from speaking – why this happened is a topic to explore in a future post – I spent time writing down some reflections on the course material presented by the Answers in Genesis speakers. I was able to have these reflections given to the students in addition to some of the other reading materials that I had already prepared. I have returned to my reflections originally written hastily in the very early hours of the morning. I have edited them for clarity and provided a few more examples. I am providing that edited version below as a small – 3000 word – glimpse into the world of creation apologetics. Does the evidence point to a young earth? A few observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Download April 2002
    Vol. 31 No. 4 April 2002 PASSING THE TORCH OF CREATION A ONCE-IN-A-LIFETIME EVENT! Pastor Chuck Smith Dr. Tim LaHaye Dr. Duane Gish Dr. Henry Morris Pastor Chuck Smith, Dr. Tim LaHaye, Dr. young dropouts in the 60s he found that Duane Gish, and Dr. Henry Morris are evolution was a major hangup. He began teaming up for one of the most momen- giving away copies of a Henry Morris tous events since the modern creation book and saw many come to Christ. From movement began over 30 years ago. Pass- those humble beginnings has risen the ing the Torch of Creation is scheduled for worldwide Calvary Chapel movement. Saturday, May 18, 2002, at Calvary Dr. Tim LaHaye will be discussing the Chapel of Costa Mesa, at 3800 South dangers of Biblical compromise, the ne- Fairview Road in Santa Ana, California. cessity of standing firm on God’s Word, The central theme and purpose of this and how this perspective led to ICR’s unique conference is to prepare and ex- founding. Dr. LaHaye shared his vision hort future generations to proclaim the for a Christian college in San Diego with truth of creation and stand firm on God’s Henry Morris in 1969. Discussions Holy Word. These four senior statesmen turned to the need for a creationist advo- will be sharing their lifetime experiences cacy and research group. Thus the Insti- and passing on spiritual and tactical wis- tute for Creation Research was birthed dom for the twenty-first century. in 1970 as the science faculty of Chris- Pastor Chuck Smith will be speaking tian Heritage College.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Answers Book 3
    First printing: February 2010 Copyright © 2009 by Answers in Genesis. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations in articles and reviews. For information write: Master Books®, P.O. Box 726, Green Forest, AR 72638 ISBN-13: 978-0-89051-579-2 ISBN-10: 0-89051-579-4 Library of Congress Number: 2008903202 Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture is from the New King James Version of the Bible. Printed in the United States of America Please visit our website for other great titles: www.masterbooks.net For information regarding author interviews, please contact the publicity department at (870) 438-5288. ® ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND SPECIAL THANKS Acknowledgments and special thanks for reviewing or editing chapters: Steve Fazekas (theology, AiG), Frost Smith (biology, editor, AiG), Mike Matthews (editor, AiG), Gary Vaterlaus (science education, editor, AiG), Tim Chaffey (theology, Midwest Apologetics), Dr. John Whitcomb (theology, presi- dent of Whitcomb Ministries), Dr. Larry Vardiman (atmospheric science, chair- man of the department of astro-geophysics at the Institute for Creation Research), Ken Ham (biology, president and CEO of Answers in Genesis), Donna O’Daniel (biology, AiG), Dr. Tim Clarey (geology), Christine Fidler (CEO of Image in the UK), Mark Looy (editor, AiG), Dr. Terry Mortenson (history of geology, AiG), John Upchurch (editor, AiG), Dr. Jason Lisle (astrophysics, AiG), Dr. John Morris (geological engineering, president of the Institute for Creation Research), Dr. Andrew Snelling (geology, director of research at AiG), Dr. David Menton (retired, cell biology, former associate professor of anatomy at Washington Uni- versity School of Medicine, now AiG), Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Clear Thinking and the Forces of Unreason
    COMMENTARY Clear Thinking and the Forces of Unreason KENDRICK FRAZIER here is a new need for rational- still a dangerous world out there, but about. We no longer can indulge such ity and reason—as well as their warnings had fallen on mostly distractions. courage and resoluteness—in deaf ears. We were too distracted with I think in the short term at least we T living the good life. Now, suddenly, no are going to see less nonsense. Psychic defense of freedom and democracy and the highest values of civilization. Since one is distracted. abilities failed to warn us of the September 11 the world has changed, Much the same could be said for rJiose September 11 attacks, and now it and a previous pop culture of superfi- of us toiling on behalf of science and rea- should be clear to all but the most com- ciality, self-absorption, self-indulgence, son and scientific skepticism. Paul Kurtz mitted or muddle-headed that such and self-satisfaction has gone out the and CSICOP and many others in the powers just don't exist. The attacks were window with it. A several-decades skeptical movement have regularly been soon followed by bogus Nostradamus period of relative innocence and chided over die years for even raising the "predictions" and other inevitable clap- naivete' has ended. Things are serious possibility that forces of unreason could trap, but those were quickly countered now, and we need all our wits about us. actually threaten our modern democratic by anti-hoax, urban legend Web sites Intelligence and wisdom are called for.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 Preparedness Plan
    COVID-19 Preparedness Plan Healthy at Work Communication Booklet Healthy at Work ReStart Process and Procedure In keeping with our Core Value to SERVE change and the overall situation dictates and in alignment with our Quality moving forward. Service Standards of safety, hospitality, presentation, and efficiency, Answers in Along with the recommendations and input Genesis and its biblical attractions, the of those listed above, Answers in Genesis Creation Museum and Ark Encounter are conducted a survey with a response of implementing additional and enhanced nearly 12,000 supporters of and guests of processes and procedures to assist with the Creation Museum and Ark Encounter. our ongoing commitment of seeking to We found that many were not only excited ensure the health and safety of our staff, and ready to visit but they will also be volunteers, guests, vendors, contractors, coming with a good understanding of the and the community-at-large as we are enhanced measures for their health and navigating through this current COVID-19 safety that create expectations for both pandemic. This document provides a look themselves and us in the current environ- at those steps being taken in addition to ment in which we find ourselves. It is our our existing procedures and is based on intent to meet those expectations where the recommended guidelines provided by and when possible in keeping with the federal, state, and health organizations as overall best interests of everyone involved. well as other industry experts. Procedures As such, many of the changes we will be and protocols will be adjusted as guidelines making are a direct result of the feedback from the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • CREATION SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Ray Mondragon (10/17, Rev 4/19)
    CREATION SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY Ray Mondragon (10/17, rev 4/19) Note: This bibliography contains mainly the books that refute the evolution worldview and support the creationist young-universe view. There are only a few books from the old-universe view as noted at the end. A few other resources have been added from Robby Dean after a 4/12/19 meeting as noted with an asterisk. CREATION vs. EVOLUTION Scientific Creationism, edited by Henry M. Morris, Institute for Creation Research, Master Books, 1974. Over 22 scientists with PhDs contribute a variety of scientific evidence supporting the creation view. Icons of Evolution: Science or Myth?, Jonathan Wells, Regnery Publishing, 2000. The main evidence supporting the theory of evolution, “icons,” are explained and effectively refuted. The Lie: Evolution, Ken Ham, Master Books, 1987. The theory of evolution is refuted more philosophically than evidentially for a general audience. Biblical Creationism: What Each Book of the Bible Teaches about Creation and the Flood, Henry Morris, Baker Book House, 1993. The entire Bible is surveyed for passages referring to creation or God as Creator. Man’s Origin, Man’s Destiny: A Critical Survey of the Principles of Evolution and Christianity, A. E. Wilder-Smith, Bethany Fellowship, Inc., 1975. A professor with PhDs in organic chemistry and medical science supports the creationist position from both science and Scripture. This is an older but still a useful work. * The Creation of Life: A Cybernetic Approach To Evolution. A. E. Wilder Smith. Older but very valuable work by a British scholar who has a Ph,D in organic chemistry, a Doctor of Science in Pharmaceuticals from the University of Geneva, and a third doctorate from the E.
    [Show full text]
  • Apologetic Resources
    APOLOGETIC RESOURCES A Young Earth ministry perspective, namely contrasting Scripture to true science now and during the ages. By Dr. Jim Pagels [email protected] 9/2016 Editor Dr. John Fricke, Emeritus Professor of Biology, Concordia University, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Copyright This book is offered as an educational resource on a no cost basis. Contents are not to be reproduced for the purpose of sale. Note that all Scriptural passages are taken from the English Standard Version. 1 I HAVE NO GREATER JOY THAN TO HEAR THAT MY CHILDREN WALK IN THE TRUTH III JOHN 1:4 Forward - Although there is much young Earth information available from commercial sources and on the internet, it was the impression of this writer that no resource that deals with basic topical issues correlating the young Earth philosophy and science exists for professional church workers. To this end, Apologetic Resources is being offered. Intended Audience – The intended audience of this reference material is primarily use by professional church workers, i.e., teachers, pastors, youth workers, etc., namely those who choose to uphold the literal interpretation of Genesis and the inerrancy of Holy Scripture. The focus in this regard is Young Earth Creationism and the catastrophic nature of the global Genesis Flood keeping in mind that Genesis 1-11 is foundational to most of the significant doctrines of Holy Scripture. Of course, laymen may well also find this reference a valuable resource. There is obviously a realistic interplay between Scripture, apologetics and true science. The goal of this document is to provide clarity to this interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • A Description of the Main Characters in the Movie the Greatest Showman
    A DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTERS IN THE MOVIE THE GREATEST SHOWMAN A PAPER BY ELVA RAHMI REG.NO: 152202024 DIPLOMA III ENGLISH DEPARTMENT FACULTY OF CULTURE STUDY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH SUMATERA MEDAN 2018 UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA AUTHOR’S DECLARATION I am ELVA RAHMI, declare that I am the sole author of this paper. Except where reference is made in the text of this paper, this paper contains no material published elsewhere or extracted in whole or in part from a paper by which I have qualified for or awarded another degree. No other person’s work has been used without due acknowledgement in the main text of this paper. This paper has not been submitted for the award of another degree in any tertiary education. Signed : ……………. Date : 2018 i UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA COPYRIGHT DECLARATION Name: ELVA RAHMI Title of Paper: A DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTERS IN THE MOVIE THE GREATEST SHOWMAN. Qualification: D-III / Ahli Madya Study Program : English 1. I am willing that my paper should be available for reproduction at the discretion of the Libertarian of the Diploma III English Faculty of Culture Studies University of North Sumatera on the understanding that users are made aware of their obligation under law of the Republic of Indonesia. 2. I am not willing that my papers be made available for reproduction. Signed : ………….. Date : 2018 ii UNIVERSITAS SUMATERA UTARA ABSTRACT The title of this paper is DESCRIPTION OF THE MAIN CHARACTERS IN THE GREATEST SHOWMAN MOVIE. The purpose of this paper is to find the main character.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution Exposed (Hebron, KY: Answers in Genesis, 2006), P
    footnotes from THE LIE We thank you for listening to the audiobook presentation of the 25th an- niversary special edition of The Lie by author Ken Ham. This download contains footnote details as well as other information related to the printed book, includ- ing more about the author and a timeline of his ministry work. For more infor- mation on other books available from Master Books, the world’s leading creation science publisher, visit our website at www.masterbooks.net. To learn more about author Ken Ham, and the Answers in Genesis Ministry, visit www.answersingen- esis.org. Chapter 1 Endnotes 1. Ken Ham and Britt Beemer, Already Gone: Why Your Kids Will Quit the Church and What You Can Do to Stop It, with Todd Hillard (Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 2009), p. 170. 2. “August 10, 2009, What I learned from the Creation Museum,” posted by a member of the Secular Student Alliance, http://pnrj.xanga.com/709441435/ what-i-learned-from-the-creation-museum/. 3. Vickie Aldous, “Nudity Issue Sparks More City Council Debate,” Ashland Daily Tidings, http://www.dailytidings.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20091118/ NEWS02/911180316. 4. For more information on observational science and historical science, see Roger Patterson, Evolution Exposed (Hebron, KY: Answers in Genesis, 2006), p. 24–26, http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/ee/what-is-science. 5. For more information on Noah’s ark and the Flood, see Ken Ham and Tim Lovett, “Was There Really a Noah’s Ark and Flood?” inThe New Answers Book ,1 Ken Ham, editor (Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • RIGHTING AMERICA at the CREATION MUSEUM by Susan L. Trollinger and William Vance Trollinger, Jr. a Concise Overview • the Crea
    RIGHTING AMERICA AT THE CREATION MUSEUM by Susan L. Trollinger and William Vance Trollinger, Jr. A Concise Overview • The Creation Museum is the crown jewel of the Answers in Genesis apologetics enterprise, an impressive and sophisticated visual argument on behalf of young Earth creationism and a highly politicized fundamentalism. • More than anything else, the Answers in Genesis enterprise (including the Creation Museum and the Ark Encounter) is best understood as a Christian Right site that relentlessly and aggressively promotes a highly ideological and radically politicized young Earth creationism as true Christianity, and that aims its attacks on – in particular – academics, feminists, gays/lesbians, and political and religious liberals. • The Creation Museum and Answers in Genesis seek to shape, prepare, and arm millions of American Christians as uncompromising and fearless warriors for what it understands to be the ongoing culture war in America. • To understand how American politics got to be where it is in 2016 -- where Donald Trump is the Republican presidential nominee, and where "facts" seem to have little bearing on his popularity -- one very good place to start is the Creation Museum. • At the Creation Museum and (of course) Ark Encounter the Flood of Genesis 6-8 is very important: not only is it used to explain away mainstream geology, but it also describes an overwhelmingly violent past Judgment that prefigures the future Judgment that will result in slaughter and eternal damnation of billions of people not in the camp of True Christians. • As bizarre as it may seem – with its claim that the God of the Bible created the universe in six consecutive 24-hour days less than 10,000 years ago – the Creation Museum lies squarely within the mainstream of the American cultural, political, and religious right.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ark Encounter & Creation Museum
    The Ark Encounter & Creation Museum August 15 - 20, 2022 Witness the life-size re-creation of Noah’s Ark, built to Per person pricing: the specifications in the Bible. See jaw-dropping exhibits inside the Ark and experience pages of the Bible like $680 double occupancy never before. We'll visit the Creation Museum - full of $660 triple occupancy biblical history, stunning exhibits, botanical gardens, $889 single occupancy planetarium, petting zoo, and much more. This tour also allows for time to visit the Newport Aquarium, which features 70 exhibits and over 200 feet of tunnels. Member Priority Date: May 15, 2022 Tour Includes: Pocketbook friendly price! • The Ark Encounter • Creation Museum • Newport Aquarium • 5 days/4 nights: 3 in Cincinnati area • 8 meals: 5 Breakfasts, 3 Dinners • Motorcoach transportation • Gratuities for driver & step-on guides gnbbank.com/go-club • Much more! 1 Monday, August 15 - Day 1 We begin our tour departing by motorcoach and heading towards our destination of the stunning Ark Encounter in Williamstown, Kentucky. Tuesday, August 16 - Day 2 We continue our journey towards Cincinnati and Williamstown today. A fun tidbit of information... NASA could lay THREE space shuttles, nose to tail, on the Ark’s roof! Meals: B, D Wednesday, August 17 - Day 3 Today we’ll experience the much-anticipated visit to the Ark Encounter! Bigger than imagination, this life- sized Noah’s Ark, built according to the dimensions given in the Bible, will amaze you. Spanning 510 ft. long, 85 ft. wide, and 51 ft. high, this modern engineering marvel wows visitors of all ages.
    [Show full text]
  • "Intermediate" Models of Origins
    Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 15/1 (Autumn 2004): 71–92. Article copyright © 2004 by Jim Gibson. Issues in “Intermediate” Models of Origins Jim Gibson Geoscience Research Institute Discussion of issues in creation is often focused on contrasting the theory of naturalistic evolution with the biblical model of a recent, six-day creation. The differences between these two theories are profound, and the contrasts can read- ily be identified in such issues as whether the universe and human life were pur- posefully designed, the nature and extent of God’s actions in the universe, and the extent to which answers to philosophical questions can be inferred from na- ture and from Scripture. Biblical creation is based on a literal-phenomenal1 interpretation of Genesis 1–3 and other creation texts. The biblical model affirms that humans were sepa- rately created in a supernatural act of creation, some thousands of years ago, at the end of a six-day creation. They were endowed with the image of God and the possibility of eternal life. The original human pair freely chose to distrust God, bringing death and other evils into the world. By contrast, naturalistic evolution is based on a naturalistic approach to sci- ence, without respect to biblical teachings. Naturalistic (“scientific”) evolution claims that humans developed from ape-like ancestors, through strictly natural processes, over several millions of years. Humans have no special status in na- ture, and there is no basis for believing in life after death. Death, disease, and suffering are simply natural by-products of the processes operating in nature and cannot be considered good or evil in any “moral” sense.
    [Show full text]