DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Following Pages Appears a Sample Essay (On a Different Topic from That of Either of the Assignments for This Unit). It D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
On the Following Pages Appears a Sample Essay (On a Different Topic from That of Either of the Assignments for This Unit). It D SAMPLE ESSAY On the following pages appears a sample essay (on a different topic from that of either of the assignments for this unit). It demonstrates one format for the layout of text, notes, and bibliography. You may use this as a guide, in addition to the departmental Style Guide (which appear separately on the Blackboard site for this unit). Remember to double-space throughout, and to number the pages. Note that a Division of Humanities cover sheet should be attached to every item of assessment submitted. The Sample Essay concerns Priscus, an important source for the history of the Roman empire in the mid-fifth century. For another example of a first-year essay, consult the Australian Society for Classical Studies website for the ASCS Australian Essay Prize Competition, and view the prize essays there, at: http://www.ascs.org.au//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=60&Itemid=40 Sample Essay AHIS120 Semester 2, 2010 Essay: length 1,200 Priscus of Panium, History The History of Priscus of Panium was composed in Greek and primarily concerns events in the eastern half of the Roman empire in the fifth century.1 Nonetheless it also provides valuable information about the western half of the empire, and may offer evidence for popular attitudes towards imperial rule at a time when the Roman empire faced competition for loyalty from the empire of Attila and the barbarian settlements in the western provinces. Most of what is known about Priscus comes from references in his own History, although a later Byzantine user mentions that he came from the city of Panium (about one hundred and fifty kilometers west of Constantinople on the Sea of Marmara).2 In the History, Priscus mentions his close relations with two senior officials of the imperial court in Constantinople: ca. 448-452 with Maximinus, a military officer whose exact title is not given; and ca. 456 with Euphemius, the magister officiorum (Master of Offices, the head of the civil service of the eastern half of the empire).3 It has been suggested that Sample Essay 1 I use the translation of R. C. Blockley, in The Fragmentary Classicising Historians of the Later Roman Empire: Eunapius, Olympiodorus, Priscus and Malchus, 2 vols., ARCA vols. 6 and 10 (Liverpool, 1981, 1983), vol. 2, pp. 221-400. There are two systems for numbering the fragments of Priscus; Blockley's is used here. Large parts of Priscus's work are also translated in C. D. Gordon, The Age of Attila: Fifth-Century Byzantium and the Barbarians (New York, 1960); and the account of Priscus's embassy to Attila (frags. 11-14) is translated in J. B. Bury, History of the Later Roman Empire, vol. 1 (London, 1923), 279-88. 2 For Priscus's career: The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire, vol. 2, ed. J. Martindale (Cambridge, 1980), `Priscus 1,' 906; Blockley, Classicising Historians, vol. 1, 48; The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium (Oxford, 1991), 1721; The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd ed. (Oxford, 1996), 1248. Panium: Tim Cornell and John Matthews, Atlas of the Roman World (Oxford, 1982), 140. 3 Maximinus: PLRE II, `Maxininus 11,' 743. Euphemius: PLRE II, `Euphemius 1,' 424. On the magister officiorum: A. H. M. Jones, The Later Roman Empire, 284-602: A Social, Economic, and Administrative Survey (Oxford, 1964), 103, 368-69, 575-84; Arthur E. R. Boak, `The Master of Offices in the Later Roman and Byzantine Empires,' in Arthur E. R. Boak and James E. Dunlap, Two Studies in Later Roman and Byzantine Administration (London, 1924). Priscus worked for Euphemius as an assessor, that is a legal advisor (senior officials acted as civil or military judges alongside the more specific tasks of their offices).4 It is debated whether Priscus had earlier worked for Maximinus also or was just a personal friend.5 Each reference to the senior officers involves undertaking a diplomatic embassy to a neighbouring power: with Maximinus to Attila, king of the Huns, in central Europe; possibly to the bishop of Rome; and to the Nobadae and Blemmyes, barbarian tribes who were harrassing the Roman provinces of Upper Egypt (Maximinus died during this trip); and with Euphemius to negotiate a settlement between the Roman empire and the neighbouring kingdom of the Lazi, east of the Black Sea.6 Priscus's History therefore was written by an author with close connections to senior military and civilian officials of the eastern empire during the reigns of Theodosius II and Marcian, and personal experience in imperial administration at least in the mid-450s and possibly before. The work contains much first-hand observation, mostly of foreign affairs. His perspective is not the official view of the imperial court, but of an informed public official.7 What survives of the History covers events between about 434 and 471; whether the original work extended before or after those dates is unknown. It has been suggested that Priscus completed the work after 476, on the basis that he speaks disparagingly of a powerful general who fell from power in that year; minor figures such as Priscus presumably did not publically criticise public figures while they 4 Priscus, frag. 33.2 and p. 394, n. 144; PLRE II, 906; Blockley, Classicising Historians, vol. 1, 48. On assessores: Jones, Later Roman Empire 499-501. 5 Priscus as assessor to both Maximinus and Euphemius: PLRE II, 906; as friend of Maximinus: Blockley, Classicising Historians, vol. 1, 48. Though Priscus's description of how Maximinus sought his company on the journey to Attila suggests a personal appeal (`Maximinus by his pleadings persuaded me to accompany him on this embassy'; Priscus, frag. 11.2); Priscus's repeated membership of diplomatic embassies suggests involvement in an official capacity. 6 Attila: frags. 11-14. Rome: frag. 20.3. Upper Egypt: frags. 26-27.1, 28. Blockley, Classicising Historians, vol. 1, 48. 7 A.D.Lee, Information and Frontiers: Roman Foreign Relations in Late Antiquity (Cambridge, 1993), 8. Sample Essay held influence.8 Priscus makes no reference to where he wrote or published his work. After his lifetime, it was available to users in Constantinople and Antioch.9 No full copy of Priscus's History is extant. Instead, there are a large number of `fragments,' sections of the text used by later writers (including the sixth-century Byzantine historian Procopius in his history of Justinian's wars, and Procopius's contemporary Jordanes in his history of the Goths). Some fragments are explicitly labelled as coming from Priscus, while others have been identified by modern scholars on the basis of similarity in topic and style. The most substantial fragments come from two works commissioned by the Byzantine emperor Constantine VII (913-959), which extracted accounts (`Excerpts') of embassies from classical and late antique Greek histories; one volume consisted of Embassies of the Romans, the other of Embassies of the Barbarians.10 Because of this selection, Priscus's work appears to have been primarily a diplomatic history of relations between the eastern Roman empire and neighbouring powers. This may not be an accurate impression, as `domestic' material not relating to diplomacy would not have been of interest to the Byzantine compilers. The longest and most often-cited fragment of Priscus's lost work concerns the embassy to Attila undertaken by Maximinus and Priscus. The vivid details of this first-hand account may well have ensured its preservation by Byzantine editors. Priscus's account provides unique information on the nature of power structures in Attila's kingdom, as the Roman embassy has to treat with several senior leaders of Attila's court before meeting Attila himself. These figures, in attendance at Attila's court, are Sample Essay 8 Blockley, Classicising Historians, vol. 1, 49-50. 9 Blockley, Classicising Historians, vol. 1, 113-18. 10 B. Baldwin, `Priscus of Panium,' Byzantion 50 (1980), 18-61; Blockley, Classicising Historians, vol. 1, 113; Oxford Classical Dictionary 1248. On Constantine VII: Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, vol. 1, 502-02; on the Excerpts: ibid., vol. 2, 767-68. themselves the rulers of smaller tribes. They advise Attilla and are ranked in precedence at the Hunnic king's formal dinner. In contrast, subject rulers of small tribes who are not honoured by Attila are required to pay tribute to the king. Attila's wife, Hereka, is also a figure of authority, though whether she has power in her own right or only through possible influence on Attila is unclear. Priscus mentions, however, that the unnamed widow of Attila's brother and former co-ruler, Bleda, rules a local village. Priscus's account shows Attila's regime as a coalition of a loose network of local powers at the level of individual villages or of small tribes, dominated by the personal authority of Attila, in turn based on the military threat of his forces. His `empire' appears to have no real equivalent to the centralised bureaucracy of the Roman empire.11 One element in particular of Priscus's account of the embassy to Attila has received extensive discussion in modern studies. While awaiting an audience with the king, Priscus meets a Greek trader, dressed as a Hun, who had been captured during a raid on imperial territory, enslaved to a Hunnic lord, and who had subsequently bought his freedom but elected to remain among the Huns. Priscus records a dialogue between himself and this merchant, in which the merchant derides government within the empire, and especially the admininstration of law, as corrupt and oppressive. Priscus defends the fairness of the Roman legal and governmental system.12 The passage has been variously interpreted. A Marxist historian writing shortly after World War Two saw it a faithful record of an actual conversation: the merchant's criticism revealed the real stresses of the oppressive class structure of the late Roman empire, and Priscus's glib response showed his inability to comprehend structural Sample Essay 11 Priscus, frags.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reasons for the Fall of the Roman Empire
    Reasons for the Fall of the Roman Empire Barbarian Tribes Destroy the Roman Empire • Germanic Teutonic Tribes Exert Pressure(1st-4th centuries A.D.) Germanic tribes – primitive, warlike peoples – lived in central and eastern Europe. They were attracted to the Roman Empire by its fertile land, great wealth and advanced civilization. Early efforts to to enter the Empire were thwarted by Roman troops. Later, Rome permitted some Germanic peoples to settle within its borders and enlisted Germanic soldiers in its armies. The Huns Invade Europe (4th-5th centuries A.D.) • The Huns, savage invaders from central Asia, terrorized Europe, causing many Germanic tribes to flee into the Roman Empire. Attila the Hun Ravaged the empire until turned back by a combined Roman-Germanic force. Nevertheless, the Huns had weakened Rome militarily. The Germanic Tribes End the Roman Empire (4th and 5th centuries A.D.) Full scale German migrations into Roman territory could not be stemmed by the enfeebled Roman government. Gradually, the Germanic tribes established kingdoms within the Empire: the Visigoths in Spain, the Ostrogoths in Italy, the Vandals in North Africa, the Franks in Gaul and the Angles and Saxons in Britain. Why could the Germanic tribes crush Rome, so long the master of the Mediterranean world? The answer lies not in Germanic strength but in Roman weakness. By the fourth and fifth centuries A.D., the Roman Empire had declined because of the following internal conditions. Political • The dictatorial government was frequently inefficient and corrupt and did not command the peoples loyalty. • The vast Empire, having relatively primitive transportation and communication, could not be governed efficiently from one central city.
    [Show full text]
  • Embassies – Negotiations – Gifts Bassies As a Basic Feature of International They Travel and How Far? Nechaeva Scru- Communication
    This book offers an original approach to the status significance of such donations. GH 30 late Roman and early Byzantine diplo- Ambassadors, who embodied high-level macy as a system. Assessing both official diplomacy, delivered gifts, led talks, and Ekaterina Nechaeva and clandestine perspectives, Ekaterina mediated international dialogue. Who Nechaeva examines the working mech- were these envoys? How dangerous and anisms of this diplomatic machine and adventurous were their missions? What reveals the ‘block’ organization of em- were these expeditions like? How did Embassies – Negotiations – Gifts bassies as a basic feature of international they travel and how far? Nechaeva scru- communication. Negotiations were split tinizes these and further questions by Systems of East Roman Diplomacy in Late Antiquity into several phases and accompanied by investigating the practices of ambassa- elaborate protocol and rich ceremony. dorial business. Throughout the book the Gift exchange and the distribution of in- analysis of secret negotiations, the intelli- signia comprised a vital part of the diplo- gence system and spy activities of envoys, matic process. What were the semantics plots and political murders reveals the of these symbolic acts? The study accents shadowy side of diplomacy. Embassies – Negotiations – GiftsEmbassies – Negotiations www.steiner-verlag.de VSWG Alte Geschichte Geographica Historica 30 Franz Steiner Verlag Franz Steiner Verlag ISBN 978-3-515-10632-0 Ekaterina Nechaeva 9 7 8 3 5 1 5 1 0 6 3 2 0 Ekaterina Nechaeva Embassies – Negotiations – Gifts geographica historica Begründet von Ernst Kirsten, herausgegeben von Eckart Olshausen und Vera Sauer Band 30 Ekaterina Nechaeva Embassies – Negotiations – Gifts Systems of East Roman Diplomacy in Late Antiquity Franz Steiner Verlag Satz: Vera Sauer Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek: Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über <http://dnb.d-nb.de> abrufbar.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman-Barbarian Marriages in the Late Empire R.C
    ROMAN-BARBARIAN MARRIAGES IN THE LATE EMPIRE R.C. Blockley In 1964 Rosario Soraci published a study of conubia between Romans and Germans from the fourth to the sixth century A.D.1 Although the title of the work might suggest that its concern was to be with such marriages through- out the period, in fact its aim was much more restricted. Beginning with a law issued by Valentinian I in 370 or 373 to the magister equitum Theodosius (C.Th. 3.14.1), which banned on pain of death all marriages between Roman pro- vincials and barbarae or gentiles, Soraci, after assessing the context and intent of the law, proceeded to discuss its influence upon the practices of the Germanic kingdoms which succeeded the Roman Empire in the West. The text of the law reads: Nulli provineialium, cuiuscumque ordinis aut loci fuerit, cum bar- bara sit uxore coniugium, nec ulli gentilium provinciales femina copuletur. Quod si quae inter provinciales atque gentiles adfinitates ex huiusmodi nuptiis extiterit, quod in his suspectum vel noxium detegitur, capitaliter expietur. This was regarded by Soraci not as a general banning law but rather as a lim- ited attempt, in the context of current hostilities with the Alamanni, to keep those barbarians serving the Empire (gentiles)isolated from the general Roman 2 populace. The German lawmakers, however, exemplified by Alaric in his 63 64 interpretatio,3 took it as a general banning law and applied it in this spir- it, so that it became the basis for the prohibition under the Germanic king- doms of intermarriage between Romans and Germans.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire
    HUNNIC WARFARE IN THE FOURTH AND FIFTH CENTURIES C.E.: ARCHERY AND THE COLLAPSE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE A Thesis Submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science. TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Laura E. Fyfe 2016 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program January 2017 ABSTRACT Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire Laura E. Fyfe The Huns are one of the most misunderstood and mythologized barbarian invaders encountered by the Roman Empire. They were described by their contemporaries as savage nomadic warriors with superior archery skills, and it is this image that has been written into the history of the fall of the Western Roman Empire and influenced studies of Late Antiquity through countless generations of scholarship. This study examines evidence of Hunnic archery, questions the acceptance and significance of the “Hunnic archer” image, and situates Hunnic archery within the context of the fall of the Western Roman Empire. To achieve a more accurate picture of the importance of archery in Hunnic warfare and society, this study undertakes a mortuary analysis of burial sites associated with the Huns in Europe, a tactical and logistical study of mounted archery and Late Roman and Hunnic military engagements, and an analysis of the primary and secondary literature. Keywords: Archer, Archery, Army, Arrow, Barbarian, Bow, Burial Assemblages, Byzantine, Collapse, Composite Bow, Frontier, Hun, Logistics, Migration Period, Roman, Roman Empire, Tactics, Weapons Graves ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Reshaping East Roman Diplomacy with Barbarians During the 5Th Century
    Chapter 1 From Hegemony to Negotiation: Reshaping East Roman Diplomacy with Barbarians during the 5th Century Audrey Becker Introduction During the first half of the 4th century ad, thanks to their military power, the Romans had been giving the barbarian tribes bordering the Danube and the Rhine no choice but to accept the conclusion of deditio after losing the war, leav- ing them in a very humiliating position.1 Yet, the military and political events of the second half of the 4th century ad, and even more of the 5th century ad, led the Romans to reconsider their relationship with the barbarian tribes.2 The characteristics of diplomatic relationship changed even before the defeat at Andrinople in 378, because the barbarian tribes, in the middle of the 4th cen- tury, gradually became able to restore the balance of power, leading the Eastern Roman Empire to reconsider its relations with its barbarian neighbours. This compelled the Byzantine Empire, from the end of the 4th century onward, to take into account barbarian leaders or kings who became, at that time, real dip- lomatic actors playing, of necessity, with formal rules of diplomatic protocol to 1 For instance, Constantinus with the Sarmatians in 323: Zosimus, Historia Nova 2.21.3, ed.Paschoud (Paris, 2000), p. 92; Julian in 358 with the Alemanni kings Suomarius and Hor- tarius: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 17.10.3, ed. Sabbah (Paris, 1989), p. 64; Ammianus Marcellinus 17.10.9, p. 66; Constantius ii, in 358 as well, with the kings of the Sarmatians and Quadi: Ammianus Marcellinus 17.12.9–16, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (Ca
    Conversion and Empire: Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (ca. 300-900) by Alexander Borislavov Angelov A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor John V.A. Fine, Jr., Chair Professor Emeritus H. Don Cameron Professor Paul Christopher Johnson Professor Raymond H. Van Dam Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes © Alexander Borislavov Angelov 2011 To my mother Irina with all my love and gratitude ii Acknowledgements To put in words deepest feelings of gratitude to so many people and for so many things is to reflect on various encounters and influences. In a sense, it is to sketch out a singular narrative but of many personal “conversions.” So now, being here, I am looking back, and it all seems so clear and obvious. But, it is the historian in me that realizes best the numerous situations, emotions, and dilemmas that brought me where I am. I feel so profoundly thankful for a journey that even I, obsessed with planning, could not have fully anticipated. In a final analysis, as my dissertation grew so did I, but neither could have become better without the presence of the people or the institutions that I feel so fortunate to be able to acknowledge here. At the University of Michigan, I first thank my mentor John Fine for his tremendous academic support over the years, for his friendship always present when most needed, and for best illustrating to me how true knowledge does in fact produce better humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • Total War Recruits Start Here…
    HEALTH ISSUES Use this software in a well-lit room, staying a good distance away from the monitor or TV screen to not overtax your eyes. Take breaks of 10 to 20 minutes every hour, and do not play when you are tired or short on sleep. Prolonged use or playing too close to the monitor or television screen may cause a decline in visual acuity. In rare instances, stimulation from strong light or flashing when staring at a monitor or television screen can cause temporary muscular convulsions or loss of consciousness for some people. If you experience any of these symptoms, consult a doctor before playing this game. If you experience any dizziness, nausea, or motion-sickness while playing this game, stop the game immediately. Consult a doctor when any discomfort continues. PRODUCT CARE Handle the game disc with care to prevent scratches or dirt on either side of the disc. Do not bend the disc or enlarge the centre hole. Clean the disc with a soft cloth, such as a lens cleaning cloth. Wipe lightly, moving in a radial pattern outward from the center hole towards the edge. Never clean the disc with paint thinner, benzene, or other harsh chemicals. Do not write or attach labels to either side of the disc. Contents Store the disc in the original case after playing. Do not store the disc in a hot or humid location. Welcome ....................................... 2 Installation Guide ................................ 3 The Total War™: ATTILA game discs contain software for use on a personal computer. Please do not play the discs on an ordinary CD player, as this may damage the Total War Recruits Start Here ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Gerhard Müller. Die Römische Kurie Und Die Reformation 1523–1534
    Modern Europe AVERIL CAMERON. Agathias. New York: Oxford MODERN EUROPE University Press. 1970. Pp. ix, 168. $5.50. GERHARD MULLER. Die romische Kurie und die Agathias, a poet, anthologist, and practicing Reformation I523-I534: Kirche und Politik lawyer, wrote a continuation of Procopius, wiihrend des Pontifikates Clemens' VII. (Quel­ len und Forschungen zur Reformationsge­ relating the wars of Justinian from 552 to schichte, Number 38.) [Gutersloh:] Gutersloher 559. He is one of the few secular historians Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn. 1969. Pp. 307. DM 45. of the early Byzantine period whose work survives in full; and although we might well In attempting to comprehend the actions of prefer the accidents of preservation to have Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article/76/3/767/94214 by guest on 30 September 2021 Pope Clement VII, even Charles v's memoirs spared Eunapius, Priscus, or Menander in­ express the exasperation: "God knows why stead, Agathias is of uncontestable value not the Pope acted thus." Divine understanding only as a source of data but also as a repre­ aside, Gerhard Muller's historical under­ sentative of the literary tradition in which he standing of Clement's politics does omit very wrote. revealing evidence as to the pope's rationale. It is particularly from the latter standpoint Contarini, "the Venetian More," put an ar­ that Mrs. Cameron has studied him, for, as gument before Clement as regards the latter's she insists, Agathias prized the literary qual­ choice of seeking the particular good of the ity of his work at least as highly as its veracity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity
    The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Wilkinson, Ryan Hayes. 2015. The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:17467211 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity A dissertation presented by Ryan Hayes Wilkinson to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2015 © 2015 Ryan Hayes Wilkinson All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Professor Michael McCormick Ryan Hayes Wilkinson The Last Horizons of Roman Gaul: Communication, Community, and Power at the End of Antiquity Abstract In the fifth and sixth centuries CE, the Roman Empire fragmented, along with its network of political, cultural, and socio-economic connections. How did that network’s collapse reshape the social and mental horizons of communities in one part of the Roman world, now eastern France? Did new political frontiers between barbarian kingdoms redirect those communities’ external connections, and if so, how? To address these questions, this dissertation focuses on the cities of two Gallo-Roman tribal groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Power of the Roman Empire
    26 Potter Chapter 2 Measuring the Power of the Roman Empire David Potter By the age of Cicero – the point at which they began to recognize the fact that they controlled a territorial empire and could raise revenue from it – the Ro- mans were accustomed to measure their power with criteria taken over whole- sale from Greek theory. In the De Legibus, Cicero says simply that senators ought to know the state of the army, the treasury, the allies, friends and tribu- taries of Rome and the nature of the attachment of each to Rome. For Cicero this is what it was to “know the State.”1 In these terms power is a function of income and manpower. Such a measurement, which, as we shall see, would have a long history going forward, was even then being amply employed by Gaius Caesar in his Gallic Wars, and had a long prior history in Greek thought. Caesar famously illustrated the power of the various Gallic and German tribes he subdued or encountered by telling his readers how many of them there were or had been. Good of the Helvetians to have produced a census docu- ment (in Greek no less) attesting to the fact that there were 368,000 of them at the beginning of their migration. There were now a mere 110,000 going home. The Suebi, the most powerful of the Germans were said (a nice concession on Caesar’s part) to have controlled one hundred districts which each furnished 1000 men to fight each year – since the same warriors only fought every other year, this meant that there were at least 200,000 of them, and there were nearly 250,000 Gauls who came to the relief of Vercingetorix (including men from tribes such as the Nervii that Caesar claimed to have annihilated in recent years).2 A conception of state power as a function of demography and money would have been familiar to any Roman aristocrat who knew (as any Roman aristo- crat would have) the works of fifth-century Greek historians.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation
    Empire of Hope and Tragedy: Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Swain Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Timothy Gregory, Co-advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Sessa, Co-advisor Copyright by Brian Swain 2014 Abstract This dissertation explores the intersection of political and ethnic conflict during the emperor Justinian’s wars of reconquest through the figure and texts of Jordanes, the earliest barbarian voice to survive antiquity. Jordanes was ethnically Gothic - and yet he also claimed a Roman identity. Writing from Constantinople in 551, he penned two Latin histories on the Gothic and Roman pasts respectively. Crucially, Jordanes wrote while Goths and Romans clashed in the imperial war to reclaim the Italian homeland that had been under Gothic rule since 493. That a Roman Goth wrote about Goths while Rome was at war with Goths is significant and has no analogue in the ancient record. I argue that it was precisely this conflict which prompted Jordanes’ historical inquiry. Jordanes, though, has long been considered a mere copyist, and seldom treated as an historian with ideas of his own. And the few scholars who have treated Jordanes as an original author have dampened the significance of his Gothicness by arguing that barbarian ethnicities were evanescent and subsumed by the gravity of a Roman political identity. They hold that Jordanes was simply a Roman who can tell us only about Roman things, and supported the Roman emperor in his war against the Goths.
    [Show full text]
  • A Game of Power Courtly Influence on the Decision-Making of Emperor Theodosius II (R
    A game of power Courtly influence on the decision-making of emperor Theodosius II (r. 408-450) Research Master Thesis Supervisor: Prof. Dr. L.V. Rutgers Consulting reader: Dr. R. Strootman RMA Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Studies Utrecht University 16-06-2013 Emma Groeneveld [email protected] 3337707 1 Index Preface ................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 4 1. Court studies ..................................................................................................... 8 2. Theodosius ......................................................................................................20 3. High officials ....................................................................................................25 4. Eunuchs ..........................................................................................................40 5. Royal women ...................................................................................................57 6. Analysis ...........................................................................................................69 Conclusion ...........................................................................................................83 Bibliography.........................................................................................................86 Appendix I. ..........................................................................................................92
    [Show full text]