DOCSLIB.ORG

'Lucy' Fossil Found

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
'Lucy' Fossil Found Published online 20 September 2006 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news060918-5 News Little 'Lucy' fossil found Toddler hominin has arms for swinging and legs for walking. Rex Dalton The 3.3-million-year-old bones of a female toddler from Ethiopia are telling scientists a story about the route human ancestors took from the trees to the ground. In today's issue of Nature, an Ethiopian-led international team reports the discovery of a juvenile skeleton of the species commonly known as 'Lucy', or Australopithecus afarensis.1,2 The researchers have named her Selam, after an Ethiopian word for 'peace'. The specimen, which is the oldest and most complete juvenile of a human relative ever found, has features that stand as striking examples of part-way evolution between primitive apes and modern humans. Although many other samples of A. afarensis have been found before, this is the first one reported to come complete with a whole shoulder-blade bone (scapula). In modern humans the scapula has a ridge running horizontally across the top of the bone; in apes the scapula's ridge reaches further down the Little Salem is the most back, where it can help to throw more muscle into arm action, as would be needed to swing from trees. ancient toddler ever found. In the young A. afarensis, the scapula looks to be part-way between. Zeresenay Alemseged and Copyright Authority for Research and Conservation "The animal was losing its capacity to be arboreal — heading right toward being human," says of Cultrual Heritages anthropologist Owen Lovejoy of Kent State University in Ohio. (ARCCH) Other hominins have been found before with traits that similarly show a cross between a life in the trees and one on the ground. A. afarensis, for example, has previously been found to have hips and knees thought to be adapted to standing upright, but curved fingers suited to grabbing branches. But 'little Lucy' is a particularly striking example of this sort of mosaic of evolution, says Zeresenay Alemseged, lead researcher on the paper and a paleoanthropologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology at Leipzig, Germany. The ridge on little Lucy's "These hominid fossils clearly show evolution in the making," he shoulder blade (a) is intermediate says. between that of gorillas and chimps (b and d) and modern Little star humans The fossils were unearthed at Dikika, just a few kilometres from the Hadar site in the Afar region of eastern Ethiopia — which in 1974 produced the original skeleton of Lucy, named after the Beetles song 'Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds', which was played during celebrations of the find's discovery. When the first Dikika fossils were uncovered in 2000, Alemseged says it was unclear exactly what it was. But after comparison with specimens at the National Museum in Addis Ababa, he realized it was a young A. Afarensis. Young bones are more fragile than their adult versions and seldom survive the rigors of time. This set survived in compressed sandstone sediments that probably washed over the young girl in a flood. It has taken five years to laboriously clean away from the bone using dental tools. The specimen includes a skull (large enough for a chimp-sized brain), a near-complete set of teeth, and all of the major limb components. Having such a complete set will provide researchers with a way to study developmental growth in this species. Visit our lucyfossil_found.html">newsblog to read and post comments about this story. References 1. Alemseged Z., et al. Nature, 443. 296 - 301 (2006). | Article | 2. Wynn J. G., et al. Nature, 443. 332 - 336 (2006). | Article | 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Nearly Complete Foot from Dikika, Ethiopia and Its Implications for the Ontogeny and Function of Australopithecus Afarensis
    Dartmouth College Dartmouth Digital Commons Dartmouth Scholarship Faculty Work 7-4-2018 A Nearly Complete Foot From Dikika, Ethiopia and its Implications for the Ontogeny and Function of Australopithecus Afarensis Jeremy M. DeSilva Dartmouth College Corey M. Gill Boston University Thomas C. Prang New York University Miriam A. Bredella Harvard Medical School Zeresenay Alemseged University of Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa Part of the Anthropology Commons Dartmouth Digital Commons Citation DeSilva, Jeremy M.; Gill, Corey M.; Prang, Thomas C.; Bredella, Miriam A.; and Alemseged, Zeresenay, "A Nearly Complete Foot From Dikika, Ethiopia and its Implications for the Ontogeny and Function of Australopithecus Afarensis" (2018). Dartmouth Scholarship. 2838. https://digitalcommons.dartmouth.edu/facoa/2838 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Work at Dartmouth Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dartmouth Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Dartmouth Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCIENCE ADVANCES | RESEARCH ARTICLE ANTHROPOLOGY Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; A nearly complete foot from Dikika, Ethiopia and its exclusive licensee American Association implications for the ontogeny and function of for the Advancement of Science. No claim to Australopithecus afarensis original U.S. Government Jeremy M. DeSilva1*, Corey M. Gill2,3,4, Thomas C. Prang5,6, Works. Distributed 3 7 under a Creative Miriam A. Bredella , Zeresenay Alemseged * Commons Attribution NonCommercial The functional and evolutionary implications of primitive retentions in early hominin feet have been under debate License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).
    [Show full text]
  • The Pleistocene Fauna (Other Than Primates) from Asbole, Lower Awash
    Geobios 37 (2004) 697–718 http://france.elsevier.com/direct/GEOBIO/ Original article The Pleistocene fauna (other than Primates) from Asbole, lower Awash Valley, Ethiopia, and its environmental and biochronological implications La faune pléistocène (sauf Primates) d’Asbole, basse vallée de l’Awash, Éthiopie: implications environnementales et biochronologiques Denis Geraads a,*, Zeresenay Alemseged b, Denné Reed c, Jonathan Wynn d, Diana C. Roman e a UPR 2147 CNRS, 44, rue de l’Amiral Mouchez, 75014 Paris, France b Institute of Human Origins, PO Box 874101, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-4101, USA c Department of Anthropology, SUNY Stony Brook, Stony Brook NY 11794-4364, USA d Department of Geography and Geosciences, Irvine Building, University of St. Andrews, St. Andrews, Fife, Scotland, KY169AL, United Kingdom e Department of Geological Sciences, 1272 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1272, USA Received 9 December 2002; accepted 28 May 2003 Abstract The Asbole area in the Lower Awash Valley yielded a diverse fauna of large and small mammals, associated with an Acheulean industry. The most notable forms are a potentially new species of herpestid, a large collection of Kolpochoerus majus, and the earliest known Bos in Africa. Biochronologically, this fauna belongs to the earliest Middle Pleistocene, and is roughly contemporaneous with the Bodo site further south. Paleoenvironmentally, the fauna suggests a mosaic of landscapes among which humid environments, grasslands and forests, are pre- dominant. © 2004 Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved. Résumé La région d’Asbole dans la basse vallée de l’Awash a livré une faune diversifiée de grands et petits Mammifères associée à une industrie acheuléenne.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanics of Bipedalism: an Exploration of Skeletal Morphology and Force Plate Anaylsis Erin Forse May 04, 2007 a Senior Thesis
    MECHANICS OF BIPEDALISM: AN EXPLORATION OF SKELETAL MORPHOLOGY AND FORCE PLATE ANAYLSIS ERIN FORSE MAY 04, 2007 A SENIOR THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS IN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN- LA CROSSE Abstract There are several theories on how humans learned to walk, and while these all address the adaptations needed for walking, none adequately describes how our early ancestors developed the mechanism to walk. Our earliest recognizable relatives, the australopithecines, have several variations on a theme: walking upright. There are varied changes as australopithecines approach the genus Homo. These changes occurred in the spine, legs, pelvis, and feet, and changes are also in the cranium, arms and hands, but these are features that may have occurred simultaneously with bipedalism. Several analyses of Australopithecus afarensis, specifically specimen A.L. 288-1 ("Lucy"), have shown that the skeletal changes are intermediate between apes and humans. Force plate analyses are used to determine if the gait pattern of humans resembles that of apes, and if it is a likely development pattern. The results of both these analyses will give insight into how modern humans developed bipedalism. Introduction Bipedalism is classified as movement of the post-cranial body in a vertical position, with the lower limbs shifting as an inverted pendulum, progressing forward. Simply, it is upright walking. Several theories have addressed why bipedalism evolved in hominids, with some unlikely ideas taking hold throughout the history of the issue. Other theories are more likely, but all lack the same characteristic: answering how bipedalism developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthro Notes : National Museum of Natural History Bulletin for Teachers
    LUCY,UPATREE? Also, they argue, at least some of the A. afarensis hominids, especially the smaller ones like Lucy, no doubt slept, Paleoanthropologists no longer ques- hid, and fed in trees enough of the tion that Lucy, a 3 1/2 foot hominid time so that we can recognize some female with a chimp- sized brain, walked arboreal features in their anatomy. on two legs in Ethiopia about 3.5 million years ago. Neither do they argue that Susman and Stern presented their the anatomy of Lucy's species, Australo - evidence and analysis in an extensive pithecus afarensis , is fully modern; all article in the Journal of Physical agree it is a "mosaic of human-like and Anthropology (March 1983) , and at an ape-like features." No one seriously exciting and often boisterous confer- disputes that bipedal ism was more impor- ence in April. The conference, held tant to their lifestyle than for any non- at the Institute of Human Origins in human primate, living or dead. However, Berkeley, was directed by Donald C. Lucy's discoverers, Donald C. Johanson Johanson, founder of the Institute. and Tim White, claim that the bipedalism There the different factions met to seen in A. afarensis differs insignifi- examine the bones and thrash out their cantly from that of modern humans. Other many different views about two con- scientists disagree. troversies: 1) When did bipedalism begin and to what extent was Lucy Recently two noted anatomists from bipedal? 2) Did A. afarensis make the State University of New York at Stony the footprints at Laetoli or did Brook, Jack Stern and Randall L.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reflection of an Ape an Aquatic Approach to Human Evolution
    The Reflection of an Ape An Aquatic Approach to Human Evolution A thesis submitted to the Miami University Honors Program in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors with Distinction by Erica Kempf December 2006 Oxord, Ohio Acknowledgements There are a number of people I would like to thank for their help in the production of this story. Linda Marchant was my advisor and provided invaluable data, advice, support, and motivation during this venture. Lynn and Greg Kempf offered helpful feedback throughout, but especially during the early stages of writing. Mary Cayton and Scott Suarez kindly agreed to read the last draft of my project, and gave me final grammatical suggestions to further polish my final copy. I am also grateful to the people whose enthusiasm and moral support throughout the long process of writing this story kept me going: Amanda Zorn, Kait Jones, Ali Wolkin, Ashley Piening, Lindsay Good, Rachel Mount and Jamie Eckert. Special thanks also go to Randy Fiedler for the initial idea to begin this work and for his help in getting started. Table of Contents Introduction viii Map x Kinship Chart xi 1 Meer 1 2 Natte 13 3 Bain 18 4 Welle 22 5 Etang 28 6 Praia 34 7 Lago 39 8 Samman 43 9 Rio 47 10 Alga 51 11 Gens 56 Works Consulted 59 Introduction The study of how humans have come to be what we are has fascinated us for as long as we have written such things down, and for countless generations before that through oral histories. Every human culture has some type of creation myth, a tale of how people came to be on Earth, ranging from molded mud to thrown rocks to drops of deity’s blood and nearly everything in between.
    [Show full text]
  • {Download PDF} from Lucy to Language Revised, Updated, And
    FROM LUCY TO LANGUAGE REVISED, UPDATED, AND EXPANDED 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Donald C Johanson | 9780743280648 | | | | | From Lucy to Language Revised, Updated, and Expanded 1st edition PDF Book In this section the authors provide answers to the basics -- "What are our closest living relatives? Instead, the hominid fossil record suggests that our ancestry is better thought of as a bush, with the branches representing a number of bipedal species that evolved along different evolutionary lines. Evidence for Bipedalism Wren rated it really liked it Sep 19, This discovery prompted a complete reevaluation of previous evidence for human origins. The paleoanthropologist one who studies ancient humans works closely with scientific colleagues to raise funding to support field projects, with a primary expectation being the recovery of the fossilized remains of our ancestors. Like no species before us, we now seem poised to control vast parts of the planet and its life. The Early Human Fossil Record6. In the years since this dramatic discovery Johanson has continued to sco In in a remote region of Ethiopia, Donald Johanson, then one of America's most promising young paleoanthropologists, discovered "Lucy", the oldest, best preserved skeleton of any erect-walking human ever found. In Part II the authors profile over fifty of the most significant early human fossils ever found. In Part II the authors profile over fifty of the most significant early human fossils ever found. Thank you for signing up, fellow book lover! More books from this author: Donald Johanson. It is a combination of the vital experience of field work and the intellectual rigor of primary research.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucy: Ethiopia's Star Skeleton
    LESSON 4 Lesson Plans Lucy: Ethiopia’s Star Skeleton Context: Lucy, the skeleton of an early human ancestor, Australopithecus afarensis, was found in the Western Afar Rift, Ethiopia, in Africa. The archaeologists who found Lucy’s remains named her after a popular song. Annotations and Notes How did one of Ethiopia’s most famous “residents” come to be fossil: remains or traces of named after a Beatles’ song? It all began on November 30, 1974. It an organism turned to stone started out the same as any other day at Hadar, an archaeological by geochemical processes site in Ethiopia. Paleontologists Tom Gray and Donald Johanson surveying: an act of were exploring an area where they had found fossils before. As measuring and examining an they walked along, surveying the area, Johanson happened to area of land notice a small, broken piece of bone sticking out of the ground. As preserve: to keep he examined it, Johanson realized that the bone was anatomically (something) in its original similar to a human bone. As the two men continued to search state or in good condition the area, they realized that they had found about 40 percent of a geologist: a person who skeleton, and one that was very well preserved. studies rocks, layers of soil, etc., in order to learn about When they returned to collect and map the hundreds of pieces of the history of the Earth and the skeleton, a team of geologists and paleontologists realized its life that these bones belonged to a hominid that was approximately paleontologist: a person 3.18 million years old and, based on the size of the bones, female.
    [Show full text]
  • ISDM IAPO 2017 Prog Book I
    17th International Symposium on Dental Morphology & 2nd congress of International Association for Paleodontology 4‐7 October 2017 BORDEAUX│France CONTENT WELCOME LETTER .......................................................................................................................... 3 ORGANIZING BOARD ..................................................................................................................... 4 SCIENTIFIC BOARD ......................................................................................................................... 5 SUPPORTING INSTITUTIONS & SPONSORS ..................................................................................... 6 PROGRAM ..................................................................................................................................... 7 ABSTRACTS ................................................................................................................................... 22 1. DENTAL EVOLUTION IN DEEP TIME ........................................................................................................ 23 2. TEETH AND ARCHAEOLOGY (HUMANS & ANIMALS) .................................................................................. 38 3. DENTAL GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................................... 78 4. DENTAL FUNCTION AND BIOMECHANICS .............................................................................................. 101 5. ODONTOLOGY AND PALEODONTOLOGY...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Australopithecus Afarensis: Lucy and Her Relatives Her Relatives Were Very Early Forms of Humans
    Australopithecus Afarensis: Lucy and her Relatives her relatives were very early forms of humans. One discovery about Lucy was In 1974, an American paleoanthropologist (studies ancient peoples) ​ named Donald Johanson discovered a partial skeleton while searching especially exciting. By studying her for artifacts under a hot African sun. skeleton, scientists found out that she After careful study, Johanson determined that the bones had come was a biped, which means she had the from a female hominid who had lived more than 3 million years ago. ability to walk on two feet. This gave She is one of the earliest hominids ever discovered. Johanson Lucy and her relatives many advantages nicknamed her “Lucy.” compared with animals such as gorillas An anthropologist in Africa called the earliest known group of and chimpanzees. With their hands free, hominids Australopithecus (aws-tray-loh-PIH-thuh-kuhs), a Latin word the hominids could gather and carry ​ ​ meaning “southern ape.” Donald Johanson called Lucy's group food more easily. They could also use Australopithecus Afarensis. The second part of this name refers to the their hands to defend themselves and ​ Afar Triangle, the part of Africa where Lucy was found. their children. Through their studies of Lucy, Scientists have learned a lot about This biped trait was one key way in early hominids. By assembling her bones, they know something about which Lucy resembled us. But in other what she looked like. Lucy was short compared with humans today – ways, hominids like Lucy were quite between 3 and 4 feet tall. She had a mix of ape and human features.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucy to Language: the Archaeology of the Social Brain
    British Academy Centenary Research Project Lucy to Language: the Archaeology of the Social Brain Cumulative list of publications by Project members [2004-2008) In press (2010 and onward) Cashmore, L.A. (in press). Can hominin ‘handedness’ be accurately assessed? Annals of Human Biology. Clegg, M. (in press). The evolution of the human vocal tract: Specialised for speech? In: N.Brannigan & S.Mithen (eds) Music and Human Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Coward, F. (submitted). ‘Relational Ecologies’. F. Coward & M. Grove (submitted). ‘Beyond the Tools: social innovation and hominin evolution’. F. Coward (in press). ‘Small worlds, material culture and Near Eastern social networks’, in R. Dunbar, C. Gamble & G. Gowlett (eds.), Social Brain, Extended Mind. London: British Academy. F. Coward & C. Gamble (in press). ‘Metaphor and Materiality in Early Prehistory’. In L. Malafouris & C. Renfrew (eds.) The Cognitive Life of Things. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs. von Cramon-Taubadel, N. & Weaver, T.D. (2010). Insights from a quantitative genetic approach to human morphological evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology. In press. Dunbar, R.I.M. (in press). Darwin and the ghost of Phineas Gage: neuro-evolution and the social brain. Cortex. Dunbar, R.I.M. (in press). The social role of touch in humans and primates: behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 00: 000-000. Dunbar, R.I.M. (in press). Brain and behaviour in primate evolution. In: P.H.Kappeler & J.Silk (eds) Mind the Gap: Tracing the Origins of Human Universals. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press. Page 1 of 24 Dunbar, R.I.M. (in press). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Worksheet: Hall of Human Origins Virtual Tour
    Hall of Human Origins GRADES 9–12 Student Worksheet: Hall of Human Origins Virtual Tour 1. Locate the three skeletons at the entrance to the hall (Page 5). On the far left is a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes), in the center is a modern human (Homo sapiens), and on the far right is an extinct species called Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis). The human and the Neanderthal share many features related to bipedalism (walking on two legs). a. Compare the human and the chimpanzee. What similarities do you see? What differences do you see? Similarities: Differences: b. Compare the human and the Neanderthal. What similarities do you see? What differences do you see? Similarities: Differences: 1 Hall of Human Origins GRADES 9–12 Student Worksheet: Hall of Human Origins Virtual Tour 2. Based on your observations, which species do you think is more closely related to modern humans (Homo sapiens)? Explain your answer. 3. Observe the Family Tree (Page 6) . You should see several skulls organized from oldest (bottom) to most recent (top). This type of tree allows scientists to demonstrate evolutionary relationships among species. Displayed here are several species of early humans (also called hominins). On the top right is the skull of a modern human (Homo sapiens). As you look from the oldest species (bottom) to the most recent species (top) what changes do you notice in the shape of the skull? 4. Observe the diorama of Australopithecus afarensis. (Page 7) You should see a male and a female walking arm in arm. This is a hominin species that existed between 4 million and 3 million years ago.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucy's Baby" -- World's Oldest Child -- Found by Fossil Hunters by James Owen
    "Lucy's Baby" -- World's Oldest Child -- Found by Fossil Hunters by James Owen for National Geographic News September 20, 2006 The world's oldest known child has been discovered in East Africa in an area known appropriately as the Cradle of Humanity. The 3.3-million-year-old fossilized toddler was uncovered in north Ethiopia's badlands along the Great Rift Valley (map of Ethiopia). The skeleton, belonging to the primitive human species Australopithecus afarensis, is remarkable for its age and completeness, even for a region spectacularly rich in fossils of our ancient ancestors, experts say. The new find may even trump the superstar fossil of the same species: "Lucy," a 3.2- million-year-old adult female discovered nearby in 1974 that reshaped theories of human evolution. (Related: "Fossil Find Is Missing Link in Human Evolution, Scientists Say" [April 2006].) Some experts have taken to calling the baby skeleton "Lucy's baby" because of the proximity of the discoveries, despite the fact that the baby is tens of thousands of years older. (See a historical photo gallery on A. afarensis and more information about Lucy.) "This is something you find once in a lifetime," said Zeresenay Alemseged of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, who led the team that made the discovery. (See a video discussing how the new child skeleton was found.) A Complete Find The child was probably female and about three years old when she died, according to the researchers. Found in sandstone in the Dikika area, the remains include a remarkably well preserved skull, milk teeth, tiny fingers, a torso, a foot, and a kneecap no bigger than a dried pea.
    [Show full text]