Who Speaks for the Microbes?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Who Speaks for the Microbes? Special Issue Who Speaks for the Microbes? Stanley Falkow Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA In discussing emerging infectious diseases, slowed and has been replaced by the encroach- the focus is often on the clinical effects of the host- ment of human populations into the domain of parasite relationship, i.e., the impact on the animal species all over the globe. It is little wonder health and survival of humans and animals, that our deliberate destruction of predators and the rather than the examination of the biology of the outgrowth of human populations into virgin land pathogen. It seems fitting to take a moment to with its attendant destruction of habitat led to the reflect on how pathogens “got that way in the first emergence of new diseases such as Lyme disease place.” Thus, while we discuss emerging and murine typhus (spread now by opossums and infections, it is worthwhile to consider that from cat fleas in our slums, instead of by the more classic the beginning of recorded history—in books or rat and rat flea vector—“sic transit gloria mundi”). the pictographs of ancient cultures—infectious diseases have been the leading cause of illness The Enemy Is Us and death. Even today, because of infectious The cartoon character Pogo, invented by Walt diseases most of the world’s population does not Kelly, once announced to his companions that have the luxury of living long enough to succumb “the enemy is us.” I believe that many of what to the chronic diseases of aging. we refer to as emerging diseases are What were and what remain the reasons that characterized better as “diseases of human infectious diseases are still the leading cause of progress.” Thus, many major public health death? I believe there are four answers. 1) The crises of the past 2 decades have been infectious presence of human populations was and is large in origin. Many, like the outbreaks of Lyme enough to sustain and amplify parasites. We have disease and murine typhus, are a natural lived in communities large enough to perpetuate consequence of human meddling. Similarly, the parasites for only about 10,000 years, barely a appearance of infections, like Legionnaires’ blink of the eye in the time frame of evolution, disease, can be traced to more subtle which means that most of the well-known differences in human behavior and social infectious diseases adapted to humans are very conventions that have an effect on the microbial recent in the evolutionary sense. The black death world. Thus, the aerosolization of water, now so of the 14th century, just 700 years ago, led to the prominent in the Western world from the death of approximately one quarter to one third of widespread use of showers instead of baths to the the human population of what was then the spraying of produce in large markets to air Western world. We may never understand the conditioning, likely has played an important role full implications of the plague outbreaks of the in the emergence of Legionnaires’ disease and also Middle Ages. The resistance of some caucasian of Mycobacterium avium infection in both healthy populations to the recent scourge of HIV actually and immunocompromised persons. may reflect the genetic consequences of plague Legionella pneumophila, the Legionnaires’ survival 20 generations ago. 2) Poverty, with its bacillus, is found in nature as an infectious agent of crowding, unsanitary conditions, and often predatory protozoa. Introduction of this organism, malnutrition, has led to an increased susceptibil- often as part of an aerosol of potable water into the ity to infection and disease. 3) War, famine, civil alveolus of the lung, results in the microorganism’s unrest, and, indeed, epidemic disease have led to finding a new niche in the macrophage instead of in a breakdown in public infrastructure and the its usual host Acanthamoeba or Hartmanella. More increased incidence of infectious diseases. 4) The absorbent tampons helped select for a new disease, domestication of animals, beginning about 12,000 toxic shock syndrome. years ago, was another important factor. The While pathogenic traits of the disease- actual large-scale domestication of animals has causing microbes are of consequence, humans Vol. 4, No. 3, July–September 1998 495 Emerging Infectious Diseases Special Issue and their technology and social behavior have The distinct difference between commensal, played a major role in providing pathogenic opportunistic, and pathogenic microbes is that microbes with new venues for their wares. Food pathogenic microbes have evolved the genetic poisoning by Escherichia coli O157, Campy- ability to breach cellular and anatomic barriers lobacter, and Salmonella emerged more from food that ordinarily restrict other microorganisms. technology and food distribution networks than Thus, pathogens can inherently cause damage to from any fundamental change in the virulence cells to forcefully gain access to a new, unique properties of the bacteria. In a sense, we have niche that provides them with less competition provided these bacteria with a moveable feast. from other microorganisms, as well as with a ready new source of nutrients. What Is a Pathogen, Anyway? For microorganisms that inhabit mammals Medicine views pathogens as microorgan- as an essential component of their survival tactic, isms capable of causing disease. The emphasis is success can be measured by their capacity to on disease, not the microorganism. However, multiply sufficiently to be maintained or be from the microbial standpoint, being pathogenic transmitted to a new susceptible host. This is true is a strategy for survival and simply one more for commensal and pathogenic organisms alike. remarkable example of the extraordinary However, if the pathogen gains a new niche free diversity of the microbial world. Humans are a of competition and rich in nutrients, it also faces home to a myriad of other living creatures. From a more hostile environment designed by mouth to anus, from head to toes, every evolution to restrict microbial entry and, indeed, millimeter of our cells exposed to the outside to destroy any intruders that enter these world is inhabited by a rich biology. From the protected regions. Thus, pathogens have not only mites that may inhabit the eyebrows to the acquired the capacity to breach cellular barriers seething cauldron of more than 600 species of but also, by necessity, have learned to bacteria that inhabit the large bowel, we are a circumvent, exploit, and subvert our normal veritable garden of microorganisms. Most of cellular mechanisms for their own selfish need to these microorganisms are not only innocuous but multiply at our expense. play a useful, yet unseen, role in our lives. They protect against the few harmful microorganisms How Did Pathogens Get That Way? that we encounter each day; they provide vitamins Recent advances in bacterial genetics, and nutrients and help digest food. We have molecular biology, and microbial genomics have harbored them so long in our evolution that they are led to a better understanding of the evolution of even a necessary part of the developmental bacterial pathogenicity. In genera that have both pathways required for the maturation of intestinal pathogenic and nonpathogenic organisms, the mucosa and the immune system. nonpathogenic bacteria frequently possess one Most microbes are commensal; that is, they (or more) large genetic insert that contains genes “eat from the same table.” Others are either exclusively associated with the pathogenic commensal or transient microbes that are phenotype. Indeed, in gram-negative enteric opportunistic; they can cause disease if one (or bacteria, pathogenic traits are commonly found more) usual defense mechanism, evolved to as large inserts of DNA in the chromosome, as are restrict microorganisms from normally sterile plasmids dedicated to the pathogenicity of the inner organs and tissue, is breached by accident, host microbe. Certain qualities of these DNA by intent (as in surgery and, increasingly, in inserts suggest that they were acquired by gunshot wounds), or by an underlying metabolic horizontal gene transfer from one microbe to or even infectious disorder. Nevertheless, a small another and that the ultimate origin of these group of microorganisms often causes infection virulence genes was a microbe very different from and overt disease in seemingly healthy persons. the organism in which these genes now reside. Many of the microorganisms, for example, These “pathogenicity islands” have been the the typhoid bacillus, gonococcus, tubercle subject of a number of recent articles. However, bacillus, and treponema of syphilis, are adapted the evolution of pathogenicity is not the product exclusively to humans; others, for example, of a slow, plodding process as much as it is the Salmonella Typhimurium, can regularly cause product of a large single genetic event that had a disease in humans, animals, birds, and reptiles. profound influence on the biology of the Emerging Infectious Diseases 496 Vol. 4, No. 3, July–September 1998 Special Issue microorganism. Thus, the divergence of Salmo- debate after 50 years. Is it because we could see nella from an ancestor that also gave rise to E. coli the effects of DDT in the pictures of fragile eagle resulted when the organism received a large eggs but not in the unseen microscopic world? As pathogenicity island that encoded a contact- Pasteur said, the microbe will endure. Perhaps dependent secretory system, which gave the host the fate of the last human is to be consumed by bacterium the ability to cross epithelial barriers. its own microorganisms. Later on in evolution, some Salmonellae received another pathogenicity island that provided the Suggested Bibliography host bacterium with the ability to survive within 1. Bäumler AJ. The record of horizontal gene transfer in phagocytic macrophages; finally, other Salmonel- Salmonella. Trends Microbiol 1997;5:318-22. lae that infect only warm-blooded animals 2.
Recommended publications
  • Louisiana Morbidity Report
    Louisiana Morbidity Report Office of Public Health - Infectious Disease Epidemiology Section P.O. Box 60630, New Orleans, LA 70160 - Phone: (504) 568-8313 www.dhh.louisiana.gov/LMR Infectious Disease Epidemiology Main Webpage BOBBY JINDAL KATHY KLIEBERT GOVERNOR www.infectiousdisease.dhh.louisiana.gov SECRETARY September - October, 2015 Volume 26, Number 5 Cutaneous Leishmaniasis - An Emerging Imported Infection Louisiana, 2015 Benjamin Munley, MPH; Angie Orellana, MPH; Christine Scott-Waldron, MSPH In the summer of 2015, a total of 3 cases of cutaneous leish- and the species was found to be L. panamensis, one of the 4 main maniasis, all male, were reported to the Department of Health species associated with progression to metastasized mucosal and Hospitals’ (DHH) Louisiana Office of Public Health (OPH). leishmaniasis in some instances. The first 2 cases to be reported were newly acquired, a 17-year- The third case to be reported in the summer of 2015 was from old male and his father, a 49-year-old male. Both had traveled to an Australian resident with an extensive travel history prior to Costa Rica approximately 2 months prior to their initial medical developing the skin lesion, although exact travel history could not consultation, and although they noticed bug bites after the trip, be confirmed. The case presented with a non-healing skin ulcer they did not notice any flies while traveling. It is not known less than 1 cm in diameter on his right leg. The ulcer had been where transmission of the parasite occurred while in Costa Rica, present for 18 months and had not previously been treated.
    [Show full text]
  • Leptospirosis Importance Leptospirosis Is a Bacterial Zoonosis That Is Common Worldwide, Especially in Developing Countries
    Leptospirosis Importance Leptospirosis is a bacterial zoonosis that is common worldwide, especially in developing countries. Organisms are shed in the urine of infected animals, including Weil’s Syndrome, rodents and domesticated animals, which may not show signs of disease. Humans Swamp Fever, Mud Fever, usually become ill after contact with infected urine, or through contact with water, Autumn Fever (Akiyami), soil or food that has been contaminated. Outbreaks have been associated with Swineherd’s Disease, floodwaters. In animals, the clinical signs of leptospirosis are often related to kidney Rice-Field Fever, disease, liver disease or reproductive dysfunction. In humans, many cases are mild or Cane-Cutter’s Fever, asymptomatic, and go unrecognized. In some patients, however, the illness may Hemorrhagic Jaundice, progress to kidney or liver failure, aseptic meningitis, life-threatening pulmonary Stuttgart Disease, hemorrhage and other syndromes. Canicola Fever, Etiology Redwater of Calves Leptospirosis is caused by various species of Leptospira, a spirochete in the family Leptospiraceae, order Spirochaetales. Some Leptospira are harmless saprophytes that reside in the environment, while others are pathogenic. The basic Last Updated: October 2013 unit of Leptospira taxonomy is the serovar. Serovars consist of closely related isolates based on serological reactions to the organism’s lipopolysaccharide. More than 250 pathogenic serovars, and at least 50 nonpathogenic serovars, have been identified. Two different systems are used to classify Leptospira isolates beyond the serovar. Before 1989, all pathogenic isolates belonged to the species L. interrogans and all nonpathogenic organisms were placed in L. biflexa. Leptospira serovars were also grouped, using serological methods, into 24 serogroups. The genus Leptospira has since been reclassified, using genetic techniques, into 21 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Milk, Mucosal Immunity and the Microbiome: Impact on the Neonate Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop Series
    Milk, Mucosal Immunity and the Microbiome: Impact on the Neonate Nestlé Nutrition Institute Workshop Series Vol. 94 Milk, Mucosal Immunity and the Microbiome: Impact on the Neonate Editors Pearay L. Ogra Buffalo, NY W. Allan Walker Boston, MA Bo Lönnerdal Davis, CA © 2020 Nestlé Nutrition Institute, Switzerland CH 1814 La Tour-de-Peilz S. Karger AG, P.O. Box, CH–4009 Basel (Switzerland) www.karger.com Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Nestlé Nutrition Workshop (94th : 2019 : Lausanne, Switzerland), author. | Ogra, Pearay L., editor. | Walker, W. Allan, editor. | Lönnerdal, Bo, 1938- editor. | Nestlé Nutrition Institute, issuing body. Title: Milk, mucosal immunity and the microbiome : impact on the neonate / editors, Pearay L. Ogra, W. Allan Walker, Bo Lönnerdal. Other titles: Nestlé Nutrition Institute workshop series ; v. 94. 1664-2147 Description: Basel ; Hartford : Karger ; Switzerland : Nestlé Nutrition Institute, [2020] | Series: Nestlé Nutrition Institute workshop series, 1664-2147 ; vol. 94 | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Summary: “This publication covers the 94th Nestle Nutritional Institute Workshop, which was designed to provide a comprehensive overview on the latest human milk research and its role in modulating mucosal immunity, the microbiome, and its impact on the neonate. This publication should provide scientific support to anyone seeking a deeper understanding of human milk and its immunological properties, and enlarge the knowledge of those who specialize in human milk research”--
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,533,014 B2 Henn Et Al
    USOO9533 014B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 9,533,014 B2 Henn et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Jan. 3, 2017 (54) SYNERGISTIC BACTERIAL COMPOSITIONS (52) U.S. CI. AND METHODS OF PRODUCTION AND USE CPC .............. A61K 35/74 (2013.01); A23L 33/127 THEREOF (2016.08); A23L 33/135 (2016.08); A61 K 38/13 (2013.01) (71) Applicant: Seres Health, Inc., Cambridge, MA (58) Field of Classification Search (US) None See application file for complete search history. (72) Inventors: Matthew R. Henn, Somerville, MA (56) References Cited (US); Geoffrey von Maltzahn, Boston, MA (US); Anthony Mario D'Onofrio, U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS Northborough, MA (US); Kevin Daniel Litcofsky, Boston, MA (US); David 3,009,864 A 1 1/1961 Gordon-Aldterton et al. 3,228,838 A 1/1966 Rinfret Arthur Berry, Brookline, MA (US); 3,608,030 A 9, 1971 Tint David N. Cook, Brooklyn, NY (US); 4,077,227 A 3, 1978 Larson Noubar B. Afeyan, Lexington, MA 4,205,132 A 5/1980 Sandline (US); John Grant Aunins, Doylestown, 4,655,047 A 4/1987 Temple 4,689,226 A 8, 1987 Nurmi PA (US) 4,839,281 A 6, 1989 Gorbach et al. 5,196.205 A 3/1993 Borody (73) Assignee: Seres Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, 5.425,951 A 6/1995 Goodrich MA (US) 5,436,002 A 7/1995 Payne 5,443,826 A 8/1995 Borody (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,599,795 A 2f1997 McCann 5,648,206 A 7, 1997 Goodrich patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,951,977 A 9, 1999 Nisbet et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Vipin Chandra Kalia Editor Quorum Sensing Vs Quorum Quenching: a Battle with No End in Sight Quorum Sensing Vs Quorum Quenching: a Battle with No End in Sight
    Vipin Chandra Kalia Editor Quorum Sensing vs Quorum Quenching: A Battle with No End in Sight Quorum Sensing vs Quorum Quenching: A Battle with No End in Sight Vipin Chandra Kalia Editor Quorum Sensing vs Quorum Quenching: A Battle with No End in Sight 123 Editor Vipin Chandra Kalia Microbial Biotechnology and Genomics CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology Delhi, India ISBN 978-81-322-1981-1 ISBN 978-81-322-1982-8 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-81-322-1982-8 Springer New Delhi Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014947883 © Springer India 2015 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Neonatal Window of Opportunity: Setting Rupted, Drives Far-Ranging Clinical Consequences
    e Journal of Immunology VOLUME 198, NUMBER 2 • JANUARY 15, 2017 • WWW.JIMMUNOL.ORG The Macro Influence of the Microbiome am pleased to draw your attention to this, the first ever topical issue of Brief Reviews in The Journal of Immunology. I Through seven Brief Reviews, this issue of The JI high- lights the pervasive impact of the gut microbiome on immune functions, both in the gut and at distal sites, and features a cover chosen from a themed competition for this issue. These compiled Brief Reviews underscore our recent appreci- ation that the far-reaching influence of commensal gut microbes on immune function reflects the coevolution of this symbiotic mi- crobial ecosystem and its mammalian hosts. Authors Torow and Hornef emphasize that the nature of this microbial community in Downloaded from human and mouse early neonates impacts immune homeostasis throughout life (1). Grigg and Sonnenberg explore the reciprocal influence of the identity and localization of the microbiome components on the balance between inflammation and immune homeostasis both within and outside the gut, and point to the therapeutic potential for diseases of chronic inflammation pro- http://www.jimmunol.org/ vided by manipulation of the microbiota-host interactions (2). Elinav and coauthors describe the microbially derived and mi- crobially modified small metabolites whose bioactivity mediates much of the influence on sterile host tissues described in the ac- companying reviews, in part by modulating nutrient content, digestion, inflammation, and epigenetic control of transcription
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Tool to Identify Unique Drug Targets in Pathogenic Bacteria
    UniDrug-Target: A Computational Tool to Identify Unique Drug Targets in Pathogenic Bacteria Sree Krishna Chanumolu, Chittaranjan Rout, Rajinder S. Chauhan* Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Jaypee University of Information Technology, Waknaghat, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, India Abstract Background: Targeting conserved proteins of bacteria through antibacterial medications has resulted in both the development of resistant strains and changes to human health by destroying beneficial microbes which eventually become breeding grounds for the evolution of resistances. Despite the availability of more than 800 genomes sequences, 430 pathways, 4743 enzymes, 9257 metabolic reactions and protein (three-dimensional) 3D structures in bacteria, no pathogen- specific computational drug target identification tool has been developed. Methods: A web server, UniDrug-Target, which combines bacterial biological information and computational methods to stringently identify pathogen-specific proteins as drug targets, has been designed. Besides predicting pathogen-specific proteins essentiality, chokepoint property, etc., three new algorithms were developed and implemented by using protein sequences, domains, structures, and metabolic reactions for construction of partial metabolic networks (PMNs), determination of conservation in critical residues, and variation analysis of residues forming similar cavities in proteins sequences. First, PMNs are constructed to determine the extent of disturbances in metabolite production by targeting a protein as drug target. Conservation of pathogen-specific protein’s critical residues involved in cavity formation and biological function determined at domain-level with low-matching sequences. Last, variation analysis of residues forming similar cavities in proteins sequences from pathogenic versus non-pathogenic bacteria and humans is performed. Results: The server is capable of predicting drug targets for any sequenced pathogenic bacteria having fasta sequences and annotated information.
    [Show full text]
  • Intestinal Complement Modulates Colitis by Targeting the Gut Microbiota
    Intestinal Complement Modulates Colitis by Targeting the Gut Microbiota The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:39945359 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use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
    [Show full text]
  • Infection, Immunology, and Sanitation
    Infection, Immunology, and Sanitation Resource Center for RCCTA CareerTech Advancement https://www.okcareertech.org/educators/resource-center Infection, Immunology, and Sanitation Copyright 2019 Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education Resource Center for CareerTech Advancement All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America by the Oklahoma Department of Career and Technology Education, Stillwater, OK 74074-4364 PHOTO CREDITS: Thinkstock® and Getty Images® Permission granted to download and print this publication for non-commercial use in a classroom or training setting. Infection, Immunology, and Sanitation Objective Sheet SPECIFIC After completing this module, you should be able to: oBJECTIVES 1. Define the term infection. 2. Complete statements that describe the effects of infection on a human host. 3. Complete statements that describe methods used to reduce the spread of infection. 4. Match types of infections and diseases to their descriptions. 5. Describe the phases in the course of a disease. 6. Complete statements that describe the role of the body’s portals of entry and portals of exit in the spread of infectious diseases. 7. List sources of the microorganisms that cause infectious diseases. 8. Select the factors that determine whether a pathogen will cause a disease in a host’s body. 9. Describe the factors that infl uence the virulence of a pathogen in a host’s body. 10. Complete statements concerning the functions of the body’s physical barriers to infection. 11. Match special structures, chemicals, and actions within the body that provide protection against infection to their functions. 12. Define the term immunology. 13. Select true statements concerning types of immunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Indicator Organisms in Meat and Poultry Slaughter Operations: Their Potential Use in Process Control and the Role of Emerging Technologies
    1387 Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 74, No. 8, 2011, Pages 1387–1394 doi:10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-433 Review Indicator Organisms in Meat and Poultry Slaughter Operations: Their Potential Use in Process Control and the Role of Emerging Technologies PARMESH K. SAINI,1 HARRY M. MARKS,2 MOSHE S. DREYFUSS,1* PETER EVANS,1 L. VICTOR COOK, JR.,1 AND UDAY DESSAI1 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/74/8/1387/1686427/0362-028x_jfp-10-433.pdf by guest on 02 October 2021 1Microbiology Division, Office Public Health Science, and 2Data Analysis & Integration Group, Office of Data Integration and Food Protection, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250-3700, USA MS 10-433: Received 4 October 2010/Accepted 21 April 2011 ABSTRACT Measuring commonly occurring, nonpathogenic organisms on poultry products may be used for designing statistical process control systems that could result in reductions of pathogen levels. The extent of pathogen level reduction that could be obtained from actions resulting from monitoring these measurements over time depends upon the degree of understanding cause-effect relationships between processing variables, selected output variables, and pathogens. For such measurements to be effective for controlling or improving processing to some capability level within the statistical process control context, sufficiently frequent measurements would be needed to help identify processing deficiencies. Ultimately the correct balance of sampling and resources is determined by those characteristics of deficient processing that are important to identify. We recommend strategies that emphasize flexibility, depending upon sampling objectives. Coupling the measurement of levels of indicator organisms with practical emerging technologies and suitable on-site platforms that decrease the time between sample collections and interpreting results would enhance monitoring process control.
    [Show full text]
  • Hospital Microbiome Variations As Analyzed by High-Throughput Sequencing
    OMICS A Journal of Integrative Biology Volume 23, Number 0, 2019 Research Article ª Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/omi.2019.0111 Hospital Microbiome Variations As Analyzed by High-Throughput Sequencing Marwa T. ElRakaiby,1,2,* Soha Gamal-Eldin,3,* Magdy A. Amin,1 and Ramy K. Aziz,1,2 Abstract Hospital-acquired infections remain a serious threat to human life and are becoming a top public health issue. As the latest advances in sequencing technologies have allowed the unbiased identification of bacterial com- munities, we aimed to implement emerging omics technologies to characterize a hospital’s microbiome at the center of Cairo, Egypt. To this end, we screened surfaces and inanimate objects in the hospital, focusing on bed sheets and door knobs, with additional screening for resistant microbes and resistance genes. While bacterial load and community composition were not dramatically different between door knobs of hospital units with different hygiene levels, the bacterial communities on door knob samples were richer and more diverse than those detected on bed sheets. Bacteria detected on door knobs were a mix of those associated with dust/ particulate matter/debris (e.g., Bacillus, Geobacillus, Aeribacillus) and skin-associated bacteria (e.g., Staphy- lococcus, Corynebacterium). The latter were among the core genera shared by all analyzed samples. Con- versely, bacteria that were more abundant in bed sheets were not associated with a particular source (e.g., Pseudomonas and Nitrobacter). Resistance screening indicated an expansion of a mobile beta-lactamase- encoding gene (blaTEM), reflecting its current global spread. This study is a first step toward more compre- hensive screening of hospital surfaces and correlating their microbiome with hospital outbreaks or chronic infections.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gut and Pre and Probiotics Candace Becker, APRN, CNS-BC, Rx, CHFH
    4/15/2018 The gut and pre and probiotics Candace Becker, APRN, CNS-BC, Rx, CHFH Objectives: Review the gut pathophysiology and inflammatory process Investigate process of gut inflammation Discuss pre and probiotics and their influence on gut health Evaluate content of common pre and probiotics 1 4/15/2018 Definitions Probiotic – “for life”- nonpathogenic organisms that have no necessary phylogenic (evolutionary) reaction. Considered “good” bacteria that help keep digestive system healthy by controlling growth of harmful bacteria. Prebiotics - carbohydrates that cannot be digested by the human body, but feed probiotics; "a selectively fermented ingredient that allows specific changes, both in the composition and/or activity in the gastrointestinal microflora that confers benefits upon host well being and health." They are dietary fibers with a well- established positive impact on the intestinal microflora. Microflora/microbiome - bacteria and microscopic organisms, especially those living in a particular site or habitat Definitions (cont.) Symbiots – pre and probiotics designed to improve survival of ingested “live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, confer health benefit on host…” Commensal organisms -- Living in a relationship in which one organism derives food or other benefits from another organism without hurting or helping it. Dysbiosis - microbial imbalance or maladaptation on or inside the body Stress – anything that threatens homeostasis 2 4/15/2018 Some basics… GI tract is home to >500 bacterial species. Bacteria + virome = microbiota Microbiota are responsible for digestion, acquiring nutrients, immune system Bacterial cells outnumber human cells 10:1 Some of the B vitamins, vitamin K, folate and short chain fatty acids are produced by gut bacteria Up to 10% daily energy needs come from gut fermentation Yeast Nutr Metab (London).
    [Show full text]