Sloatsburg, New York
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Passaic County, New Jersey (All Jurisdictions)
VOLUME 1 OF 5 PASSAIC COUNTY, NEW JERSEY (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER BLOOMINGDALE, BOROUGH OF 345284 CLIFTON, CITY OF 340398 HALEDON, BOROUGH OF 340399 HAWTHORNE, BOROUGH OF 340400 LITTLE FALLS, TOWNSHIP OF 340401 NORTH HALEDON, BOROUGH OF 340402 PASSAIC, CITY OF 340403 PATERSON, CITY OF 340404 POMPTON LAKES, BOROUGH OF 345528 PROSPECT PARK, BOROUGH OF 340406 RINGWOOD, BOROUGH OF 340407 TOTOWA, BOROUGH OF 340408 WANAQUE, BOROUGH OF 340409 WAYNE, TOWNSHIP OF 345327 WEST MILFORD, TOWNSHIP OF 340411 WOODLAND PARK, BOROUGH OF 340412 Preliminary: January 9, 2015 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 34031CV001B Version Number 2.1.1.1 The Borough of Woodland Park was formerly known as the Borough of West Paterson. NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. Part or all of this FIS may be revised and republished at any time. In addition, part of this FIS may be revised by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS. It is, therefore, the responsibility of the user to consult with community officials and to check the community repository to obtain the most current FIS components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: September 28, 2007 Revised Countywide FIS Date: This preliminary FIS report does not include unrevised Floodway Data Tables or unrevised Flood Profiles. -
Army Corps of Engineers Response Document Draft
3.0 ORANGE COUNTY Orange County has experienced numerous water resource problems along the main stem and the associated tributaries of the Moodna Creek and the Ramapo River that are typically affected by flooding during heavy rain events over the past several years including streambank erosion, agradation, sedimentation, deposition, blockages, environmental degradation, water quality and especially flooding. However, since October 2005, the flooding issues have severely increased and flooding continues during storm events that may or may not be considered significant. Areas affected as a result of creek flows are documented in the attached trip reports (Appendix D). Throughout the Orange County watershed, site visits confirmed opportunities to stabilize the eroding or threatened banks restore the riparian habitat while controlling sediment transport and improving water quality, and balance the flow regime. If the local municipalities choose to request Federal involvement, there are several options, depending on their budget, desired timeframe and intended results. The most viable options include a specifically authorized watershed study or program, or an emergency streambank protection project (Section 14 of the Continuing Authorities Program), or pursing a Continuing Authorities Program study for Flood Risk Management or Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 205 and Section 206 of the Continuing Authorities Program, respectively). Limited Federal involvement could also be provided in the form of the Planning Assistance to States or Support for Others programs provide assistance and limited funds outside of traditional Corps authorities. A watershed study focusing on restoration of the Moodna Creek, Otter Creek, Ramapo River and their associated tributaries could address various problems using a systematic approach. -
Hudson River Valley
Hudson River Valley 17th Annual Ramble SEPTEMBER 3-25, 2016 WALK, HIKE, PADDLE, BIKE & TOUR HudsonRiverValleyRamble.com #HudsonRamble A Celebration of the Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s Hudson River Estuary Program, and New York State Parks and Historic Sites B:8.4375" T:8.1875" S:7" There’s New York and then there’s New York Traveling through Stewart International Airport is the easiest way to take full advantage of the Hudson Valley’s astounding B:11.125" T:10.875" natural beauty and historic S:10" attractions. In addition to off ering hassle-free boarding, on-time performance and aff ordable fares on Allegiant, American, Delta and JetBlue, we’re also just a short drive from New York City. So, to make the most of your time in the Hudson Valley, fl y into Stewart. And begin exploring. Stewart International Airport JOB: POR-A01-M00808E DOCUMENT NAME: 6E79822_POR_a2.1_sk.indd DESCRIPTION: SWF Destinations of NY Tourism ad BLEED: 8.4375" x 11.125" TRIM: 8.1875" x 10.875" SAFETY: 7" x 10" GUTTER: None PUBLICATION: Westchester Official Travel & Meeting Guide ART DIRECTOR: COPYWRITER: ACCT. MGR.: Basem Ebied 8-3291 ART PRODUCER: PRINT PROD.: Peter Herbsman 8-3725 PROJ. MNGR.: None This advertisement prepared by Young & Rubicam, N.Y. 6E79822_POR_a2.1_sk.indd CLIENT: PANYNJ TMG #: 6E79822 HANDLE #: 2 JOB #: POR-A01-M00808E BILLING#: POR-A01-M00808 DOCUMENT NAME: 6E79822_POR_a2.1_sk.indd PAGE COUNT: 1 of 1 PRINT SCALE: None INDESIGN VERSION: CC 2015 STUDIO ARTIST: steven -
Ramapough/Ford the Impact and Survival of an Indigenous
Antioch University AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses Dissertations & Theses 2015 Ramapough/Ford The mpI act and Survival of an Indigenous Community in the Shadow of Ford Motor Company’s Toxic Legacy Chuck Stead Antioch University - New England Follow this and additional works at: http://aura.antioch.edu/etds Part of the American Studies Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Environmental Health Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Ethics and Political Philosophy Commons, Indigenous Studies Commons, Toxicology Commons, United States History Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Stead, Chuck, "Ramapough/Ford The mpI act and Survival of an Indigenous Community in the Shadow of Ford Motor Company’s Toxic Legacy" (2015). Dissertations & Theses. 200. http://aura.antioch.edu/etds/200 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student & Alumni Scholarship, including Dissertations & Theses at AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations & Theses by an authorized administrator of AURA - Antioch University Repository and Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Department of Environmental Studies DISSERTATION COMMITTEE PAGE The undersigned have examined the dissertation entitled: Ramapough/Ford: The Impact and Survival of an Indigenous Community in the Shadow of Ford Motor Company’s Toxic Legacy presented by Chuck -
Water Resources of the New Jersey Part of the Ramapo River Basin
Water Resources of the New Jersey Part of the Ramapo River Basin GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1974 Prepared in cooperation with the New Jersey Department of Conservation and Economic Development, Division of Water Policy and Supply Water Resources of the New Jersey Part of the Ramapo River Basin By JOHN VECCHIOLI and E. G. MILLER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1974 Prepared in cooperation with the New Jersey Department of Conservation and Economic Development, Division of Water Policy and Supply UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1973 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-600358 For sale bv the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $2.20 Stock Number 2401-02417 CONTENTS Page Abstract.................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction............................................................................................ ............ 2 Purpose and scope of report.............................................................. 2 Acknowledgments.......................................................................................... 3 Previous studies............................................................................................. 3 Geography...................................................................................................... 4 Geology -
Project Report: Development of a TMDL for the Wanaque Reservoir
Project Report Development of a TMDL for the Wanaque Reservoir and Cumulative WLAs/LAs for the Passaic River Watershed Submitted To Division of Watershed Management NJ Department of Environmental Protection Trenton, New Jersey June 2005 Project Report Development of a TMDL for the Wanaque Reservoir and Cumulative WLAs/LAs for the Passaic River Watershed Submitted To Division of Watershed Management NJ Department of Environmental Protection Trenton, New Jersey June 2005 NAJARIAN ASSOCIATES Eatontown, New Jersey TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction............................................................................. 1-1 1.1 TMDL Basis.....................................................................................1-1 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................1-2 1.3 Approach.........................................................................................1-2 2. Reservoir Characteristics...................................................... 2-1 2.1 Reservoir’s Tributary Watershed ..................................................2-2 2.2 Diversion Intake Sites ....................................................................2-4 2.3 Previous Studies of Reservoir Water Quality ..............................2-8 3. River Simulation..................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Model Development .......................................................................3-1 3.2 Data Preparation.............................................................................3-3 -
8. Narrative Statement of Significance Overview the Robert W. and Mary F
United States Department of the Interior OMB No. 1024-0018, NPS Form National Park Service Property Name McCready, Robert W. & Mary F., House Location Sloatsburg, Rockland County, New York NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section Number 8 Page 1 8. Narrative Statement of Significance Overview The Robert W. and Mary F. McCready house enjoys tangible historic associations with the life of Robert Workman McCready (1862-1949), an Irish-born builder who rose to prominence in the greater Sloatsburg area, particularly in association with the construction of major architectural commissions executed by his company in Tuxedo Park. Trained initially in his trade in Belfast, under the employ of the shipbuilding firm of Harland & Wolff, McCready came to America and in the ensuing years worked for the well-known construction firm of Mead & Taft. In 1889 he formed a professional partnership with his brother-in-law William Finch, general contractors under the name of McCready & Finch, before assuming sole ownership of the company in 1904. During its time the company was responsible for executing important domestic commissions in Tuxedo Park, New York, where major works of residential architecture were being built to the plans of some of the nation’s leading architectural offices, and at the height of its prominence employed upwards of 600 employees. McCready retired from business in the 1920s, and lived in the nominated house, built c. 1889 as a wedding gift to his spouse Mary Finch McCready, until their deaths in 1949. It is an example of eclectic Late Victorian domestic design, with interior and exterior work reflecting Eastlake, Queen Anne and Colonial Revival-style influence, though not all representative of a single building campaign. -
Pompton Lake and Ramapo River TMDL Support Study (NE-PASSAIC-1)
Pompton Lake and Ramapo River TMDL Support Study (NE-PASSAIC-1): For Work Supporting the Department of Environmental Protection in the Development of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) or Other Management Responses to Restore Impaired Waterbodies in the Non- Tidal Passaic River Basin FINAL Prepared for: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Watershed Management Division Trenton, NJ Prepared by: Quantitative Environmental Analysis, LLC Montvale, NJ Job Number: DEPpom:132 July 5, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... ES-1 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT............................................................................... 1-2 SECTION 2 POMPTON LAKE AND WATERSHED.......................................................... 2-1 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND.............................................................. 2-1 2.2 WATER QUALITY....................................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 November 18, 2003 Sampling Event....................................................................... 2-3 2.2.2 Historical Water Quality Data ................................................................................ -
2019 Hudson River Valley Ramble Booklet
Hudson River Valley 20th Annual WALK • HIKE • PADDLE • BIKE • TOUR Ramble Throughout September LEBR CE AT I N G years20 HudsonRiverValleyRamble.com #HudsonRamble A Celebration of the Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s Hudson River Estuary Program, and New York State Parks and Historic Sites Hudson River Valley DOWNLOAD 20th Annual RamblePRESENTED BY & DISCOVER In Partnership with And 150 Sponsoring Sites and Organizations Media Sponsor Barnabas McHenry, Co-Chair, Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area; Chairman, Hudson River Valley Greenway Communities Council Kevin Burke, Co-Chair, Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area; Chairman, Greenway Conservancy for the Hudson River Valley, Inc. Scott Keller, Executive Director, Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area, Hudson River Valley Greenway Basil Seggos, Commissioner, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with Fran Dunwell, Special Assistant and Hudson River Estuary Coordinator, NYSDEC Erik Kulleseid, Commissioner, New York State Office of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation Howard Zemsky, President, CEO & Commissioner, Empire State Development The free FOR MORE INFORMATION: Hudson River Valley Ramble (518) 473-3835 hudsonrivervalleyramble.com Maurice D. Hinchey Hudson River Valley National Heritage Area; Hudson River Hudson River Valley Greenway (518) 473-3835 HudsonRiverValley.com; HudsonGreenway.NY.gov; HudsonRiverGreenwayWaterTrail.org Train Tour app NYSDEC Estuary Program (845) -
Declaration for the Record of Decision, Ramapo Landfill
x SDMS Document 99361 * DECLARATION FOR THE RECORD OF DECISION Site Name and Location Ramapo Landfill, Town of Ramapo, Rockland County, New York Statement of Basis and Purpose This decision document presents the selected remedial action for the Ramapo Landfill site (the "Site"), located in the Town of Ramapo, Rockland County, New York, which was chosen in accordance with the requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675, as amended, and to the extent practicable, the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan, 40 CFR Part 300. This decision document explains the factual and legal basis for selecting the remedy for the Site. The information supporting this remedial action decision is contained in the administrative record for the Site. The administrative record index is attached (Appendix III). The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) concurs with the selected remedy. (See Appendix IV.) NYSDEC will also concur with the contingent remedy, should the confirmatory studies determine that the contingent remedy is appropriate. Assessment of the Site Actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances from the Site, if not addressed by implementing the response action selected in this Record of Decision (ROD), may present a significant and substantial endangerment to public health, welfare, or the environment. Description of the Selected Remedy - This operable unit represents the entire remedial action for the Site. It addresses the principal threats to human health and the environment at the Site by controlling the source of contamination and the generation of contaminated leachate, as well as by treating contaminated groundwater. -
Culture of Salmonids
COLDWATER FISHERIES MANAGEMENT PLAN NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Culture of Salmonids Overview The stocking of New Jersey waters with trout spans well across an entire century. The stocking program, fish culture technology and attitudes have changed considerably during this time frame. Initially viewed as only serving the wealthy, the stocking of trout was not supported by the New Jersey Fish and Game Commission. The first stocking of brook trout by the Commission in 1879 was only in response to a severe drought and was intended to replenish native populations which were believed to be decimated. The idea caught on however and more focused efforts were made for expanding recreational opportunities across the state. The first stocking records date back to 1879. The mode of transport was by train, using milk cans. Upon arrival trout were transferred to wagons which transported the fish to streams. Fish were initially purchased under contract from private hatcheries. In 1912, the State began construction of its own hatchery in Hackettstown and began producing fingerlings. Production of catchable size brook, brown and rainbow trout began in 1914. By 1932, the Hackettstown hatchery was raising over 500,000 trout for distribution across the state. The transport of fish was now done by truck but milk cans still served as holding areas. In the years that followed disease outbreaks among the hatchery stock due to the intensive culture increased, as did the demand for other warmwater species. In 1980, the construction of the Pequest Trout Hatchery began and the production of all trout, with the exception of lake trout, was transferred there when the facility opened in 1983. -
2021 Trout Allocations
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Fish & Wildlife 2021 Spring Trout Allocations This alphabetical listing of trout-stocked waters allows anglers to quickly reference an individual waterbody to obtain the 2021 spring trout allocations. This information is subject to change and any deviations will be noted on the Division's website (www.njfishandwildlife.com/trtinfo_spring21.htm#updates). Anglers should consult the 2021 Freshwater Fishing Digest, pages 18 - 23, for a complete description of all trout fishing regulations, including special regulations that may apply to individual trout-stocked waters. All trout stocked will be rainbow trout only. PRE-SEASON IN-SEASON STOCKING PERIOD STOCKING SPRING PERIOD Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 SEASON Mar 15 - Apr 9 Apr 12 - 16 Apr 19 - 23 Apr 26 - Apr 30 May 3 - May 7 May 10 - 14 May 17 - 21 May 24 - 28 TOTAL WATERBODY # Trout # Trout # Trout # Trout # Trout # Trout # Trout # Trout # Trout Alexauken Creek 850 - - - - - - - 850 Alms House Pond 240 - - - - - - - 240 Amwell Lake 1,290 - - - - - - - 1,290 Andover Jct Brook 510 - - - - - - - 510 Assunpink Creek 1,460 - - - - - - - 1,460 Barbour's Pond 1,380 - - - - - - - 1,380 Beaver Brook (Morris) 790 - - - - - - - 790 Beaver Brook (Warren) 1,740 - - - - - - - 1,740 Big Flat Brook (above Steam Mill Bridge) 1760 - - - - - - - 1760 Big Flat Brook (below Steam Mill Bridge) 25,570 - - - - 7,680 - - 33,250 Birch Grove Park Pond 1,310 - - - - - - - 1,310 Black River 3,810 - - - - 1,440 - - 5,250 Blair Creek 820