Educator Guide a Landmark Repurposed
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Samuel Clemens Carriage House) 351 Farmington Avenue WABS Hartford Hartford County- Connecticut
MARK TWAIN CARRIAGE HOUSE HABS No. CT-359-A (Samuel Clemens Carriage House) 351 Farmington Avenue WABS Hartford Hartford County- Connecticut WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA REDUCED COPIES OF THE MEASURED DRAWINGS PHOTOGRAPHS Historic American Buildings Survey National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20013-7127 m HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY MARK TWAIN CARRIAGE HOUSE HABS NO. CT-359-A Location: Rear of 351 Farmington Avenue, Hartford, Hartford County, Connecticut. USGS Hartford North Quadrangle, Universal Transverse Mercator Coordinates; 18.691050.4626060. Present Owner. Occupant. Use: Mark Twain Memorial, the former residence of Samuel Langhorne Clemens (better known as Mark Twain), now a house museum. The carriage house is a mixed-use structure and contains museum offices, conference space, a staff kitchen, a staff library, and storage space. Significance: Completed in 1874, the Mark Twain Carriage House is a multi-purpose barn with a coachman's apartment designed by architects Edward Tuckerman Potter and Alfred H, Thorp as a companion structure to the residence for noted American author and humorist Samuel Clemens and his family. Its massive size and its generous accommodations for the coachman mark this structure as an unusual carriage house among those intended for a single family's use. The building has the wide overhanging eaves and half-timbering typical of the Chalet style popular in the late 19th century for cottages, carriage houses, and gatehouses. The carriage house apartment was -
ARCHITECTURALLY SOUND Engineered / Zoning / Construct
Monolithic 同一方向安装 ARCHITECTURALLY SOUND Engineered / Zoning / Construct China India Rest of Asia Beijing / Tianjin / Wuhan /Shenzhen Bangalore Manila T +86 10 6465 1206 T +91 98459 14059 T +63 915 816 7127 Shanghai / Suzhou / Nanjing Chennai Seoul Hangzhou / Hefei T +91 98408 98963 T +82 2 3783 0747 T +86 21 6145 1758 Delhi Singapore Chengdu / Chongqing T +91 98104 77922 T +65 6593 1301 www.millikencarpet.com T +86 181 1727 5593 Mumbai Tokyo Guangzhou T +91 98926 00362 T +81 3 5203 8406 2710024918 T +86 20 3846 8085 Jakarta Issued Jul 2019 Hong Kong T +6221 5289 7330 T +852 3956 2259 INSPIRED. INSPIRING. 源于灵感 智启灵感 Construct, Zoning and Engineered in Art Nouveau, monolithic installation Construct and Zoning in Art Nouveau, monolithic installation 2 3 Zoning and Engineered in Baroque, monolithic installation Engineered in Baroque, monolithic installation 4 5 在不同色彩层次中丰富大面积空间。 自由拼接,拓展更多设计可能性。 Use accent color to make use of space and to expand design possibility. Construct, Zoning and Engineered in Gothic, monolithic installation 6 7 Construct, Zoning and Engineered in Art Nouveau, monolithic installation Engineered in Bauhaus, monolithic installation 8 9 Construct and Zoning in High Tech, monolithic installation 10 11 INSPIRED. INSPIRING. 源于灵感 智启灵感 Beginning with solid architectural elements, trace out a meticulous inspiring space. From dark to light, natural color transition as music notes, slowly flow along elegant and pure, brand new tones lighting up the space. 以坚实的建筑元素为起点, 勾画更细致的灵动空间。 从深到浅,颜色自然过渡, 如音符点染其中慢慢流动, 或优雅、或清新, 全新的色彩和空间区隔, 让室内的每寸光线,都瞬间被点亮。 Construct, Zoning and Engineered in Bauhaus, monolithic installation 12 13 These three patterns share the same colorline for easier coordination. -
Brief History of Architecture in N.C. Courthouses
MONUMENTS TO DEMOCRACY Architecture Styles in North Carolina Courthouses By Ava Barlow The judicial system, as one of three branches of government, is one of the main foundations of democracy. North Carolina’s earliest courthouses, none of which survived, were simple, small, frame or log structures. Ancillary buildings, such as a jail, clerk’s offi ce, and sheriff’s offi ce were built around them. As our nation developed, however, leaders gave careful consideration to the structures that would house important institutions – how they were to be designed and built, what symbols were to be used, and what building materials were to be used. Over time, fashion and design trends have changed, but ideals have remained. To refl ect those ideals, certain styles, symbols, and motifs have appeared and reappeared in the architecture of our government buildings, especially courthouses. This article attempts to explain the history behind the making of these landmarks in communities around the state. Georgian Federal Greek Revival Victorian Neo-Classical Pre – Independence 1780s – 1820 1820s – 1860s 1870s – 1905 Revival 1880s – 1930 Colonial Revival Art Deco Modernist Eco-Sustainable 1930 - 1950 1920 – 1950 1950s – 2000 2000 – present he development of architectural styles in North Carolina leaders and merchants would seek to have their towns chosen as a courthouses and our nation’s public buildings in general county seat to increase the prosperity, commerce, and recognition, and Trefl ects the development of our culture and history. The trends would sometimes donate money or land to build the courthouse. in architecture refl ect trends in art and the statements those trends make about us as a people. -
Classicism, Modernism, Postmodernism, and Importance of Communication
Classicism, Modernism, Postmodernism, and Importance of Communication Taylor Stevenson Art History II Prof Jason Bernagozzi Midterm Exam March 09, 2016 Art and societies have long since been integrated, with both realms reflecting each other through understandings, values, and ideas. When either realm changes its ideologies, the other realm tends to reflect those changes in a similar form. This is prevalent in the understanding of art movements over the course of history, especially with three periods of art: Classicism, Modernism, and Post Modernism. Through these art movement periods, we can see how ideologies of the artist have evolved from working for other professions that use art as a means to an end, to using art as a way to communicate their own ideas, to creating art for the viewer to decide on the meaning. Many artworks that were taken from (or inspired by) Greek and Roman cultural art are considered to be classical. This may be because at this point in time, the societies behind these works of art have established an aesthetic standard that serves as a fundamental basis for other art movements. The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica note “’classic’ is also sometimes used to refer to a stage of development that some historians have identified as a regular feature of what they have seen as the cyclical development of all styles.” When applied to art (especially art in the western/European world), these “classic” greek and roman roots placed emphasis on a realistic form, and line over color in two dimensional pieces1. Sculptures of these times, while considered important, did not necessarily translate into the aesthetic view of the next generation. -
Historic Art-Deco in the Heart of the Dtphx Music Scene
HISTORIC ART-DECO IN THE HEART OF THE DTPHX MUSIC SCENE 747 W VAN BUREN ST, PHOENIX, AZ 85007 HISTORIC ART DECO BUILDING FOR SALE ABOUT THE PROPERTY 747 W. Van Buren is a 2,821 SF historic Art Deco/Art Moderne building superbly located adjacent to some of Phoenix’s most exciting music, entertainment and nightlife. Many of these venues, such as Crescent Ballroom, The Van Buren and The Valley Bar are located in historic adaptive-reuse projects, bringing a distinctive new personality to the area. 747 W. Van Buren brings a unique opportunity to add to the growing Downtown entertainment scene, with this rare sale. Located just West of the Southwest corner of Van Buren and 7th Avenue, the location is within walking distance of both the Grand Avenue Arts District and the Roosevelt Row Arts District, as well as the Downtown ASU Campus. These areas continue to grow, and with many new multifamily projects having just been completed or currently under construction, the area is dense with young urban professionals and recent graduates. As Downtown Phoenix continues to become a more walkable urban core filled with activity, restaurants, nightlife and tourism, this location is a rare opportunity to develop something extraordinary and make a permanent mark on the future of our city. INTERSECTION OF VAN BUREN AND CENTRAL AVENUE ART DECO DESIGN IN PHOENIX (1925-1940s) Art Deco is a style of visual arts, architecture and design that first appeared in France just before World War I. Some examples of Art Deco Architecture in Phoenix include The Luhrs Tower, The City-County Building, The Orpheum Theatre and The Arizona Biltmore Hotel. -
“International Style” and Its Interpretation at the Beginning Of
DOI: 10.4467/25438700SM.18.048.9213 VIKTOR PROSKURYAKOV*, YULIYA BOHDANOVA**, RUSLAN YURIYCHUK*** use the terminology of the countries of which these lands Basic material statement were part of during the times of researched objects con - At the beginning of the 21st century interest struction. in studying art and architecture of the 20th In connection to this, recently in order to characterize archi- century has increased. Unfortunately, cultural “International style” and its tecture of the first third of the 20th century, on the territory of achievement of the period which has begun Ukraine the term “modernism” is widely used, which in its after World War II has not gained overall rec- meaning is close to understanding of “international style” ognition yet, it can be at least claimed about interpretation at the beginning of by Le Corbusier. Ukrainian wikipedia, as the most accessible the territories of Ukraine. Nevertheless, the source, provides the following explanation of these terms first third of the 20th century is currently in fo- “architecture of modernism generalizes a few tendencies in cus of numerous world researchers. Address- the XXI century itself, styles in architecture which appeared in the 20 th cen- ing what questions can most frequently be tury and tried to bring the features of dashing technological found in scientific published works dedicated advance into architecture. Modernism was one of prevail- to this historical period? Abstract ing styles of the 20th century architecture and still adheres The article is dedicated -
0Bthe Nashville Voter
0BTHE NASHVILLE VOTER The League of Women Voters of Nashville PO Box 158369, Nashville TN 37215 │ 629-777-5650 http://www.LWVnashville.org Volume 74, No. 3 August 2020 CALENDAR OF EVENTS August 1, 2020. “We Count: First Time Voters” Exhibit. Frist Art Museum Online Exhibition and in the Conte Community Arts Gallery. August 18, 2020. 9:30 – 10:30 a.m. Suffrage Re-enactment live-streamed from the State Capitol. The reenactment, titled “Our Century! Living Tennessee's History of the Ratification,” will take place on the floor of the House chamber at the State Capitol on Aug. 18 — the same day and place it did a century ago. It will be livestreamed via the TNWoman100 Facebook and YouTube pages, as well as the Facebook pages of the Tennessee State Library and Archives, Tennessee State Museum, Tennessee State Parks and Tennessee Historical Society. http://tnwoman100.com/ is the website of The Official Committee of the State of Tennessee Woman Suffrage Centennial. August 18, 2020. 10:30 a.m. to Noon. Dedication of the Suffrage Monument. Metro Nashville, Sponsored by Tennessee Woman Suffrage Monument Board, Women's Suffrage Centennial Commission. Centennial Park. In addition to the dedication ceremony, women from Highlight Pro Skydiving Team will parachute into Centennial Park carrying banners for the Suffrage Centennial. https://vodayo.com/womansuffragemonument/. August 18, 2020. 11:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m. Her Flag: A Suffrage Celebration live-streamed from TPAC. This is a reservation event only. The Zoom link and password for the discussion will be emailed to registrants. Join TPAC for a live look-in via Zoom as artist and activist Marilyn Artus sews the final Tennessee stripe of her nationwide Her Flag art project to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment and voting rights for women in the United States. -
Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One
Survey of Post-War Built Heritage in Victoria: Stage One Volume 1: Contextual Overview, Methodology, Lists & Appendices Prepared for Heritage Victoria October 2008 This report has been undertaken in accordance with the principles of the Burra Charter adopted by ICOMOS Australia This document has been completed by David Wixted, Suzanne Zahra and Simon Reeves © heritage ALLIANCE 2008 Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Context ......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Project Brief .................................................................................................................................. 5 1.3 Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Contextual Overview .................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 Places of Potential State Significance .................................................................................... 35 3.1 Identification Methodology .......................................................................................................... 35 3.2 Verification of Places .................................................................................................................. 36 3.3 Application -
PENTAGON OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX Other Name/Site Number: the Pentagon
NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 THE PENTAGON Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: PENTAGON OFFICE BUILDING COMPLEX Other Name/Site Number: The Pentagon 2. LOCATION Street & Number: U.S. 1, Va. 110, and Not for publication: Interstate 395 City/Town: Arlington Vicinity:__ State: Virginia County: Arlington Code: 013 Zip Code: 20301 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private:__ Building(s): X Public-local:__ District:__ Public-State:__ Site:__ Public-Federal: X Structure:__ Object:__ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 1 ____ buildings 1 sites (helipad) ____ structures ____ objects 1 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 4 Name of related multiple property listing: NFS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 THE PENTAGON Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service______National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___ nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ___ meets ___ does not meet the National Register Criteria. -
Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review
Attachment B Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Modern Movement Architecture in Central Sydney Heritage Study Review Prepared for City of Sydney Issue C x January 2018 Project number 13 0581 Modern Movement in Central Sydney x Heritage Study Review EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This study was undertaken to provide a contextual framework to improve understanding post World War II and Modern Movement architecture and places in Central Sydney, which is a significant and integral component of its architectural heritage. Findings x The study period (1945-1975) was an exciting and challenging era that determined much of the present physical form of Central Sydney and resulted in outstanding architectural and civic accomplishments. x There were an unprecedented number of development projects undertaken during the study period, which resulted in fundamental changes to the physical fabric and character of Central Sydney. x The buildings are an historical record of the changing role of Australia in an international context and Sydney’s new-found role as a major world financial centre. Surviving buildings provide crucial evidence of the economic and social circumstances of the study period. x Surviving buildings record the adaptation of the Modern Movement to local conditions, distinguishing them from Modern Movement buildings in other parts of the world. x The overwhelming preponderance of office buildings, which distinguishes Central Sydney from all other parts of NSW, is offset by the presence of other building typologies such as churches, community buildings and cultural institutions. These often demonstrate architectural accomplishment. x The triumph of humane and rational urban planning can be seen in the creation of pedestrian- friendly areas and civic spaces of great accomplishment such as Australia Square, Martin Place and Sydney Square. -
Student Profile 2018-2019
VISITMUSICCITY.COM NASHVILLE WAS NAMED ONE OF THE TOP TEN STUDENT DESTINATIONS IN 2018 BY SYTA. LEARN (Student Youth and Travel Organization, April 2018) Adventure Science Center Experience Nashville Tours The Parthenon adventuresci.org experiencenashvilletours.com parthenon.org Andrew Jackson’s Hermitage Echoes of Nashville Walking Tours The Upper Room Chapel & Museum thehermitage.com echoesofnashville.com upperroom.org Belle Meade Plantation Frist Art Museum United Street Tours bellemeadeplantation.com fristartmuseum.org unitedstreettours.com Belmont Mansion Hatch Show Print belmontmansion.com hatchshowprint.org Group recording with Meghan Linsey on Nashville Studio Tour Bicentennial Capitol Mall State Park Historic Travellers Rest tnstateparks.com travellersrestplantation.org Chaffin’s Barn Theatre Lane Motor Museum dinnertheatre.com lanemotormuseum.org Cheekwood Estate and Gardens Plaza Mariachi Music City cheekwood.org plazamariachi.com NEW Frist Art Museum Chocolate classes at the Goo Goo Cluster Shop and Dessert Bar googoo.com Student group recordings at historic Sound Stage Studios with Imagine Recordings PLAY imaginerecordings.com Adventureworks Live variety show featuring 60 years of Nashville music at The Music of Nashville adventureworks.com themusicofnashville.com Amazing Scavenger Hunt Adventure Interactive workshop with The Voice runner-up Meghan Linsey on the new Nashville Studio Tour urbanadventurequest.com nashvillestudiotour.com Dave & Buster’s daveandbusters.com/Nashville New two-floor, 137,000 square foot Tennessee -
6. After Modernity: Rohmer's Classicism and Universalism
6. After Modernity: Rohmer’s Classicism and Universalism Grosoli, Marco, Eric Rohmer’s Film Theory (1948-1953). From ‘école Schérer’ to ‘Politique des auteurs’. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2018 doi: 10.5117/978946298580/ch06 Abstract From the outset of his career, Eric Rohmer made no secret of his preference for classicism, as far as both aesthetics in general and cinematic aesthetics in particular are concerned. One must hasten to add, however, that he never really conceived of “classic” and “modern” as two opposite concepts. Rather, he maintained that what is truly classic is also truly modern, because in either case genuine art is primarily about achieving a certain harmony with nature. What he exactly meant by this forms the main subject matter of this chapter, which also clarifies the degree to which Rohmer’s aesthetics can be called “universalist” and “anti-evolutionist”, and why. In addition, Rohmer’s views on the key notions of authorship and mise en scene are also summarily sketched. Keywords: Rohmer, classic, modern, universalism, aesthetics 6.1. Beyond modern art Rohmer’s attachment to classical tragedy is a clear token of his overt classi- cism, which can hardly be accounted for as orthodox and one-dimensional. For him, ‘classicism’ and ‘modernity’ are not necessarily opposite. In order to clarify this issue, it is again useful to draw upon Kant, since the critic’s classicism and his peculiar, idiosyncratic Kantism ultimately shed a decisive light on each other. For one thing, Rohmer does not connect cinema and Kantian aesthetics in a straightforward way. Contrary to what the previous chapter(s) might have suggested, in spite of cinema’s capability to attain artistic and natural beauty and to tackle freedom, it would be too simplistic to maintain that Rohmer regarded cinema simply as the perfect match to Kant’s ideas on aesthetics.