DOCSLIB.ORG

Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenario Report Prepared by September 20, 2015 Table of Contents Chapter Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 INTRODUCTION 13 AUTHORIZATION 13 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 BACKGROUND / PURPOSE 14 SCENARIO LOCATIONS 16 MODEL SIMULATIONS 18 SCENARIO 1: GREEN SWAMP RAILROAD BERMS 21 1.1. DESCRIPTION 21 1.2. MODEL SET-UP 23 1.3. RESULTS 25 1.4. CONCLUSION 29 SCENARIO 2: GREEN SWAMP RAILROAD BRIDGE PILINGS 30 2.1. DESCRIPTION 30 2.2. MODEL SET-UP 31 2.3. RESULTS 33 2.4. CONCLUSION 36 SCENARIO 3: GREEN SWAMP AND SR 471 37 3.1. DESCRIPTION 37 3.2. MODEL SET-UP 38 3.3. RESULTS 39 3.4. CONCLUSION 42 SCENARIO 4: HILLSBOROUGH RIVER OVERFLOW AT US 98 43 4.1. DESCRIPTION 43 4.2. MODEL SET-UP 44 4.3. RESULTS 46 4.4. CONCLUSION 47 Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenarios Report: September 2015 SCENARIO 5: BRIDGE CROSSINGS NEAR TRILBY AND LACOOCHEE 48 5.1. DESCRIPTION 48 5.2. MODEL SET-UP 50 5.3. RESULTS 51 5.4. CONCLUSION 53 SCENARIO 6: LAKE ORIOLE 54 6.1. DESCRIPTION 54 6.2. MODEL SET-UP 56 6.3. RESULTS 57 6.4. CONCLUSION 61 SCENARIO 7: WYSONG-COOGLER WATER CONSERVATION STRUCTURE 62 7.1. DESCRIPTION 62 7.2. MODEL SETUP 65 7.3. RESULTS 65 7.4. CONCLUSION 70 SCENARIO 8: FLOOD STORAGE 71 8.1. DESCRIPTION 71 8.2. MODEL SETUP 72 8.3. RESULTS 73 8.4. CONCLUSION 74 SCENARIO 9: WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER HIGH INITIAL WATER LEVEL COMPARISONS 75 9.1. DESCRIPTION 75 9.2. MODEL SETUP 76 9.3. RESULTS 79 9.4. CONCLUSION 83 SCENARIO 10: FLYING EAGLE BERM IN TSALA APOPKA 84 10.1. DESCRIPTION 84 10.2. MODEL SET-UP 86 10.3. RESULTS 87 10.4. CONCLUSION 92 Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenarios Report: September 2015 SCENARIO 11: TSALA APOPKA PRE-SETTLEMENT CONDITIONS 93 11.1. DESCRIPTION 93 11.2. MODEL SETUP 94 11.3. RESULTS 95 11.4. CONCLUSION 101 SCENARIO 12: TSALA APOPKA AND THE ORANGE STATE CANAL 102 12.1. DESCRIPTION 102 12.2. MODEL SET-UP 103 12.3. RESULTS 105 12.4. CONCLUSION 110 SCENARIO 13: TSALA APOPKA STRUCTURE SIZES 111 13.1. DESCRIPTION 111 13.2. MODEL SETUP 113 13.3. RESULTS 115 13.4. CONCLUSION 117 SCENARIO 14: TSALA APOPKA STRUCTURE OPERATIONS 119 14.1. DESCRIPTION 119 14.2. MODEL SETUP 121 14.3. RESULTS 121 14.4. CONCLUSION 123 SCENARIO 15: TSALA APOPKA OUTFLOWS AND ARROWHEAD ESTATES 124 15.1. DESCRIPTION 124 15.2. MODEL SETUP 126 15.3. RESULTS 126 15.4. CONCLUSION 129 SCENARIO 16: GREEN SWAMP ROCK FORMATIONS 131 16.1. DESCRIPTION 131 16.2. MODEL SET-UP 132 16.3. RESULTS 134 16.4. CONCLUSION 137 Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenarios Report: September 2015 SCENARIO 17: ROCKS NEAR JUMPER CREEK 138 17.1. DESCRIPTION 138 17.2. MODEL SET-UP 141 17.3. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 142 17.4. CONCLUSION 143 SCENARIO 18 AND 19: MODIFICATIONS TO LAKE ROUSSEAU OUTFLOW TO THE LOWER WITHLACOOCHEE 144 18.1. DESCRIPTION 144 18.2. MODEL SETUPS 145 Scenario 18: Bypass Channel Expansion 146 Scenario 19: Barge Canal 147 18.3. RESULTS 149 18.4. CONCLUSIONS 150 REFERENCES 151 APPENDIX A: SCENARIO SUMMARIES 153 Tables Page Table 1 Storm Events Simulated Rainfall Amounts .............................................................................. 19 Table 8-1 Peak stage comparison at SR 200 and Arrowhead Estates ..................................................... 74 Table 9-1 Design Storm Rainfall Amounts ............................................................................................... 76 Table 9-2 High Initial Water Levels in Tsala Apopka................................................................................ 78 Table 13-1 Differences in Flows, Water Levels and Volumes with Structure Modifications .................. 116 Table 14-1 Summary of Changes to the Tsala Apopka Pools during the Mean Annual Storm Event ..... 122 Table 14-2 Summary of Changes to the Tsala Apopka Pools during the 10-Year Storm Event .............. 122 Table 15-1 Peak Stage Comparison: S-353 Scenario ............................................................................... 127 Table 16-1 Average Water Level Increase (inches) at Locations of Simulated Rocks ............................. 135 Table 18-1 Flow and Water Level Comparison at Bypass Spillway ......................................................... 149 Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenarios Report: September 2015 Figures Page Figure 1 Withlacoochee Watershed Boundary ..................................................................................... 15 Figure 2 Location of Withlacoochee River Model Scenarios ................................................................. 17 Figure 3 Low Initial Water Level ............................................................................................................ 18 Figure 4 High Initial Water Level ........................................................................................................... 19 Figure 1-1 Green Swamp Streams and Creeks ......................................................................................... 22 Figure 1-2 Historic Railroad Berms are used Today as Access for Land Management and Recreation ... 23 Figure 1-3 Historic Berms in the Green Swamp that were Removed for this Scenario ........................... 24 Figure 1-4 Existing Topography with Berms Present (left side) and Simulated Topography with Berms Removed (right side) ............................................................................................ 25 Figure 1-5 Peak Water Level Changes from Simulated Berm Removal .................................................... 26 Figure 1-6 Comparison of Flows for the Little Withlacoochee River at SR 471 for the 2004 Hurricanes 27 Figure 1-7 Comparison of Flows for the Withlacoochee River at SR 471 for the 2004 Hurricanes.......... 28 Figure 1-8 Comparison of Combined Flows for Devils Creek and Gator Hole Slough for the 2004 Hurricanes ............................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 1-9 Flow Volume Increases (acre-feet) with Historical Railroad Berms Removed ........................ 29 Figure 2-1 Remnant Bridge Pilings across the Withlacoochee River in the Green Swamp ...................... 30 Figure 2-2 Bridge Piling Log Jams along the Withlacoochee River in the Green Swamp ......................... 31 Figure 2-3 Profile and Cross Section of Log Jam ....................................................................................... 32 Figure 2-4 Comparison of Existing Flow Obstruction (left side) and Simulated Natural Condition (right side) ............................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 2-5 Log Jam Cross Section during High Water Event ..................................................................... 34 Figure 2-6 Comparison of Water Levels Upstream of Log Jam for the Mean Annual Storm ................... 35 Figure 2-7 Comparison of Water Levels Upstream of Log Jam for the 2004 Hurricanes ......................... 35 Figure 2-8 Comparison of Low Water (left side) and High Water (right side) at a Bridge Piling Log Jam in the Green Swamp near Dade City ......................................................................... 36 Figure 3-1 Locations of Major Stream and Culvert Crossings under SR 471 in the Green Swamp .......... 37 Figure 3-2 Looking Downstream at the SR 471 Bridge Crossing on the Withlacoochee River (2008) ..... 38 Figure 3-3 Digital Terrain with and without the Footprint of SR 471 at the Little Withlacoochee River . 39 Figure 3-4 Comparison of Flows on the Withlacoochee River at SR 471 for the 100-year Storm Event . 40 Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenarios Report: September 2015 Figure 3-5 Comparison of Flows for the Little Withlacoochee River at SR 471 ........................................ 41 Figure 3-6 Comparison of Combined Flows for Devils Creek and Gator Hole Slough .............................. 41 Figure 3-7 Percent Difference in Total Flow Volume for the 2004 Hurricanes ........................................ 42 Figure 4-1 Location of the Hillsborough River Overflow from the Green Swamp.................................... 43 Figure 4-2 Aerial View of the US 98 Bridge Crossing on the Hillsborough River ...................................... 44 Figure 4-3 Digital Terrain of the Hillsborough River at the US 98 Bridge ................................................. 45 Figure 4-4 Comparison of the Current US 98 Bridge Opening to the Natural Flow Path (black line) ...... 46 Figure 4-5 Peak Water Level Changes (inches) from the Simulated Removal of US 98 (2004 Hurricanes) .................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 5-1 Bridges crossing the Withlacoochee River near Trilby and Lacoochee ................................... 48 Figure 5-2 Bridge over the Withlacoochee River at SR 575 ...................................................................... 49 Figure 5-3 Bridge over the Withlacoochee River at US 301 ..................................................................... 49 Figure 5-4 Flooding in Trilby, FL from High Water on the Withlacoochee River in 1933 ......................... 50 Figure 5-5 Existing Terrain with Bridges and Roadway Berms near Trilby, FL .......................................... 51 Figure 5-6 Modified Terrain with Bridges and Roadway Berms Removed in the Model ......................... 51 Figure 5-7 Upstream Side of SR 575 during the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Integrated Report
    FINAL Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: 2016 Sections 303(d), 305(b), and 314 Report and Listing Update Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection June 2016 2600 Blair Stone Rd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 FINAL 2016 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2016 This Page Intentionally Blank. Page 2 of 298 FINAL 2016 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2016 Letter to Floridians Page 3 of 298 FINAL 2016 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2016 Acknowledgments This document was prepared by staff in the following divisions and offices of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP): Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration − Bureau of Laboratories: o Biology Section − Water Quality Standards Program: o Standards Development Section o Aquatic Ecology and Quality Assurance Section − Water Quality Assessment Program: o Watershed Assessment Section o Watershed Monitoring Section − Water Quality Evaluation and Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) Program: o Ground Water Management Section o Watershed Evaluation and TMDL Section − Water Quality Restoration Program: o Nonpoint Source Management Section o Watershed Planning and Coordination Section Division of Water Resource Management − Domestic Wastewater Program − Industrial Wastewater Program − State Revolving Fund Program − Engineering, Hydrology, and Geology Program − Submerged Lands and Environmental Resources Coordination Program − Water Compliance Assurance Program Office of Water Policy Office of Intergovernmental Programs In addition, DEP thanks staff at the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Florida Department of Health, and Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services for their valuable help in updating sections of this report, and the Southwest, Suwannee River, and St.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: Sections 303(D), 305(B), and 314 Report and Listing Update
    2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida: Sections 303(d), 305(b), and 314 Report and Listing Update Division of Environmental Assessment and Restoration Florida Department of Environmental Protection June 2020 2600 Blair Stone Rd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 floridadep.gov 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2020 This Page Intentionally Blank. Page 2 of 160 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida, June 2020 Letter to Floridians Ron DeSantis FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Governor Jeanette Nuñez Environmental Protection Lt. Governor Bob Martinez Center Noah Valenstein 2600 Blair Stone Road Secretary Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 June 16, 2020 Dear Floridians: It is with great pleasure that we present to you the 2020 Integrated Water Quality Assessment for Florida. This report meets the Federal Clean Water Act reporting requirements; more importantly, it presents a comprehensive analysis of the quality of our waters. This report would not be possible without the monitoring efforts of organizations throughout the state, including state and local governments, universities, and volunteer groups who agree that our waters are a central part of our state’s culture, heritage, and way of life. In Florida, monitoring efforts at all levels result in substantially more monitoring stations and water quality data than most other states in the nation. These water quality data are used annually for the assessment of waterbody health by means of a comprehensive approach. Hundreds of assessments of individual waterbodies are conducted each year. Additionally, as part of this report, a statewide water quality condition is presented using an unbiased random monitoring design. These efforts allow us to understand the state’s water conditions, make decisions that further enhance our waterways, and focus our efforts on addressing problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology of the Floral City Pool of Tsala Apopka Lake, West-Central Florida
    HYDROLOGY OF THE FLORAL CITY POOL OF TSAIA APOPKA LAKE, WEST-CENTRAL FLORIDA By L.A. Bradner U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 88-4024 Prepared in cooperation with the SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT Tallahassee, Florida 1988 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report may be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Books and Open-File Reports Section Suite 3015 Federal Center, Building 810 227 North Bronough Street Box 25425 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract.............................................................. 1 Introduction.......................................................... 2 Historical background............................................ 2 Purpose and scope................................................ 5 Previous studies................................................. 5 Acknowledgments.................................................. 6 Geography and geology................................................. 6 Hydrogeology.......................................................... 6 Water use............................................................. 6 Physical properties of the Floral City Pool........................... 7 Hydrologic conditions................................................. 9 Rainfall and evaporation......................................... 9 Surface water...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Activities Conducted Under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2012-2013
    Annual Report of Activities Conducted under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invasive Plant Management Section Submitted by: FL Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invasive Plant Management Section 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. MS705 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Phone: 850-617-9420 Fax: 850-922-1249 Annual Report of Activities Conducted under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2012-2013 This report was prepared in accordance with §369.22 (7), Florida Statutes, to provide an annual summary of plants treated and funding necessary to manage aquatic plants in public waters. The Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program administered by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) in Florida’s public waters involves complex operational and financial interactions between state, federal and local governments as well as private sector companies. FWC’s aquatic plant management program mission is to reduce negative impacts from invasive nonindigenous plants like water hyacinth, water lettuce and hydrilla to conserve the multiple uses and functions of public lakes and rivers. Invasive plants infest 96% of Florida’s 451 public waters inventoried in 2013 that comprise 1.26 million acres of fresh water. Once established, eradicating invasive plants is difficult or impossible and very expensive; therefore, continuous maintenance is critical to keep invasive plants at low levels to
    [Show full text]
  • Floods in Florida Magnitude and Frequency
    UNITED STATES EPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR- ., / GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FLOODS IN FLORIDA MAGNITUDE AND FREQUENCY By R.W. Pride Prepared in cooperation with Florida State Road Department Open-file report 1958 MAR 2 CONTENTS Page Introduction. ........................................... 1 Acknowledgements ....................................... 1 Description of the area ..................................... 1 Topography ......................................... 2 Coastal Lowlands ..................................... 2 Central Highlands ..................................... 2 Tallahassee Hills ..................................... 2 Marianna Lowlands .................................... 2 Western Highlands. .................................... 3 Drainage basins ....................................... 3 St. Marys River. ......_.............................. 3 St. Johns River ...................................... 3 Lake Okeechobee and the everglades. ............................ 3 Peace River ....................................... 3 Withlacoochee River. ................................... 3 Suwannee River ...................................... 3 Ochlockonee River. .................................... 5 Apalachicola River .................................... 5 Choctawhatchee, Yellow, Blackwater, Escambia, and Perdido Rivers. ............. 5 Climate. .......................................... 5 Flood records ......................................... 6 Method of flood-frequency analysis ................................. 9 Flood frequency at a gaging
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report of Activities Conducted Under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2013-2014
    Annual Report of Activities Conducted under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invasive Plant Management Section Submitted by: Jeffrey D. Schardt FL Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Invasive Plant Management Section 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. MS705 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Phone: 850-617-9420 Fax: 850-922-1249 [email protected] Annual Report of Activities Conducted under the Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program in Florida Public Waters for Fiscal Year 2013-2014 This report was prepared in accordance with §369.22 (7), Florida Statutes, to provide an annual summary of plants controlled and funds expended managing aquatic plants in public waters. The Cooperative Aquatic Plant Control Program (Cooperative Program) administered by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) in the state’s public lakes and rivers involves complex operational and financial interactions between state, federal and local governments as well as private sector companies. The FWC has entered into 45 financial agreements (including contracts, task assignments, cooperative agreements, and purchase orders) with the aforementioned entities. The FWC receives some federal funding through the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the USACE directly funds and controls aquatic plants, employing USACE management crews in much of the St. Johns River and its tributaries. Since all of the public waters managed by the USACE are eligible for state funding through the Cooperative Program, and since the FWC occasionally assists in control operations in these waters, FWC staff monitors plant populations and control efforts and includes USACE activities in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • December 5, 2000 –Regular Meeting Commission Minute Book No
    December 5, 2000 –Regular Meeting Commission Minute Book No. 32 Page 929 The Board of County Commissioners of Citrus County, Florida, met in regular session on the above date. The Chairman called the meeting to order. Commissioner Fowler led in the Invocation and the Pledge of Allegiance to the U.S. Flag. Commissioners: Commissioners Roger Batchelor, Chairman; Jim Fowler, First Vice- Chairman; Gary Bartell, Second-Vice Chairman; Vicki Phillips and Josh Wooten Attorneys: Larry M. Haag and Carl E. Kern, Assistant Administrator: Richard Wm. Wesch, Interim Clerk: Betty Strifler, Clerk; Theresa Steelfox and Glenda Brown, Deputy Clerks #3 CONSENT AGENDA Upon motion by Commissioner Phillips, seconded by Commissioner Fowler, and carried unanimously, the Board expressed appreciation for (Item #3-I) the donation from the Citrus County School Board for the pool cover and winding system for the Bicentennial Park Pool, and approved the Consent Agenda as follows: #3-A Approved the minutes of the regular meetings held on November 14, 2000 and November 21, 2000. #3-B Approved the following warrants: Payroll registers dated 11/24/00 at $498,418.89, and 11/30/00 at $146,084.97. Accounts Payable register dated 12/05/00 at $1,327,002.86. #3-C Approved the following budget transfers: OHR: $1,000 from #001-2107-54000 to #55417. CIP: $845 from #001-247-241 to #-2140-55275. PSD/ANIMAL CTRL: $850 from #001-2140-56200 to #-56300. RMD: $5,000 from #102-4102-53400 to #-54300, and $3,000 from #-55100 to #-55211. SWM: $600 from #401-5212-55210 to #-55211 and $420 from #-5217-55210 to #-55211.
    [Show full text]
  • Withlariverbasinaccomp Front.Ai
    Southwest Florida Water Management District Withlacoochee River Basin Board FY2007 Accomplishments On October 19, 2006, the Withlacoochee River Basin Board held its annual planning workshop for the purpose of reviewing recent accomplishments, identifying emerging issues and setting strategic budget priorities for fiscal year 2008. These priorities provide guidance to District staff and the Basin Board’s cooperators in identifying projects for potential Basin Board funding. At the workshop, the Board agreed on the following set of strategic budget priorities. Strategic Budget Priorities for Fiscal Year 2008 • Watershed Management Program • Withlacoochee River Feasibility Study • Western Terminus-Greenway • Springs Protection/SWIM • Tsala Apopka Task Force • Alternative Water Supply Development • Public and Youth Education While the above priorities were developed to help ensure that the most critical needs of the Withlacoochee River basin are addressed, the Basin Board funds a wide variety of projects to assist in the achievement of the mission of the Southwest Florida Water Management District. These include projects that fall within each of the District’s four areas of responsibility: water supply, flood protection, water quality and natural systems. Southwest Florida Water Management District Water Supply Natural Systems Basin Board funding for the Partnership Agreement (F025) The Withlacoochee River Basin Board has substantially has been completed. The Withlacoochee River Basin Board completed funding in FY2007 to evaluate the has been a long-standing participant in the reductions in restoration alternatives for the portion of the pumpage at the 11 northern Tampa Bay well fields with Withlacoochee River downstream of the Inglis Dam $65,829 allocated in its FY2007 budget.
    [Show full text]
  • Southwest Florida Water Management District That Includes the Following: Brian J
    2379 Broad Street, Brooksville, Florida 34604-6899 (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only) WaterMatters.org An Equal Bartow Office Sarasota Office Tampa Office Opportunity 170 Century Boulevard 78 Sarasota Center Boulevard 7601 U.S. 301 North (Fort King Highway) Employer Bartow, Florida 33830-7700 Sarasota, Florida 34240-9770 Tampa, Florida 33637-6759 (863) 534-1448 or (941) 377-3722 or (813) 985-7481 or 1-800-492-7862 (FL only) 1-800-320-3503 (FL only) 1-800-836-0797 (FL only) KellyS. Rice February 23, 2021 .0 Chair, Citrus, Lake, Levy, Sumter Joel Schleicher Vice Chair, Charlotte, Sarasota The Honorable Ron DeSantis Rebecca Smith State of Florida Secretary, Hillsborough, Pinellas Plaza Level 05, The Capitol James G. Murphy Treasurer, Polk 400 South Monroe Street ·. Ed Armstrong Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0001 0 1 Pinellas 1-'·,..,.-._., ....y, . Ashley Bell Barnett Polk Subject: Southwest Florida Water Management"Dis.trict2o21"'t'6.ns61idated Annual Report Jack Bispham Manatee Dear Governor DeSantis: Roger Germann Hillsborough John Mitten Pursuant to Section 373.036(7), Florida Statutes, the water management districts are to Hernando, Marion prepare and submit a consolidated annual report on the management of water resources Seth Weightman by March 1 of each year. Pasco Michelle Williamson Hillsborough On February 23, the District Governing Board approved the 2021 Consolidated Annual Report for the Southwest Florida Water Management District that includes the following: Brian J. Armstrong, P.G. El<ecutive Director );> Water Management
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    DRAFT 2/14/2019 ConsolidatedAnnual Report March 1, 2019 Consolidated Annual Report Project Team Overall report coordination, preparation and distribution ……..Trisha Neasman, Dennis Cockrell Executive Summary .................................................................................................. Trisha Neasman Chapter 1. Water Management District Performance Measures Annual Report .......... Jim Golden Chapter 2. Minimum Flows and Levels Priority List and Schedule and Reservations List and Schedule .................................................................. Doug Leeper Chapter 3. MFL/Water Quality Grade for Projects .................Tamera McBride, Michael Hancock Chapter 4. Annual Five-Year Capital Improvements Plan ......... .Mike Cacioppo, Andrea Shamblin Chapter 5. Alternative Water Supplies Report ..................................................... .Anthony Andrade Chapter 6. Five-Year Water Resources Development Work Program ..................... .John Ferguson Chapter 7. Polk Regional Water Cooperative Status Report ...................................... .Joseph Quinn Chapter 8. Florida Forever Work Plan ………………………………………………………………..Rick Vaughn Chapter 9. Mitigation Donation Annual Report ................................................... .Michelle Hopkins Chapter 10. 2019-2023 Strategic Plan (updated February 2019) and the Annual Work Plan Report .................................................................... Trisha Neasman DISTRICT OFFICES Brooksville Bartow Sarasota Tampa 2379 Broad Street 170 Century Boulevard
    [Show full text]
  • U N S U U S E U R a C S
    r e 41 v i R St u Hw Kings a y 2 ass Rd N Shaky Jasper Pond S U tH S w H y 75 w Roberts Pond 1 95 y 1 5 4 r ( StHwy 6 1 L Thomas C em NASSAU Tu F rn or T e rail r 129 R Main St Nassau No 2 d Village-Ratliff ) 108th Congress of the United States Ellis 17 HAMILTON Bay CHARLTON 301 DISTRICT Clapboard Creek Braddock Rd Bridges Rd r Plummer Rd 3 ee Rive GEORGIA n FLORIDA an w u Little Trout R Browns Creek S 295 1 S (H tH ec w k y 1 5A sc 0 tHwy 11 he 5 S r) r Moncrief Dinsmore Rd New Kings Rd (Soutel D D r ) MADISON 1 Mayport Sta wy 1 1 ) tH ve S A woo d In e tr dg a (E c o a s Ribault 20th 20th t a Cecil l R St St Haines St Field W 10 Kings Rd a t NAS 23 e White Springs r CoRd 10A w Six Mile Cr a y Ellis Rd N y 1 Howard St StHw 0 (At lantic StHwy 121 StHwy B 90 S lvd) Beaver St o DUVAL u t h Ellis Rd S St s Post i 10 d Rd Lake City Rd e Jacksonville ver Bakersfield Dr B Howard a l Be Memorial Park Rd v Hyde d Live St Macclenny Baldwin Beach Blvd ) Grove Ave 90 Oak lvd ( B Willis Br BAKER Y dy Glen St. Mary e an 441 l StHwy 217 rm Herlong l o R o N Wilson Blvd w ( Rd o 28 o 2 s S W y e w v St Johns River t U 41 a H e H t l S t S Fouraker Rd Ortega t w e H r B y Ohio Ave Old Middleburg Rd w 202 R River l y (J v 1 w Turner Butler Blvd ) 295 y tH d d 3 95 S ) (S 9 StHwy 134 (103rd St) a 0 StHwy 8 n Cecil Field NAS A California Ave J Southside Blvd o l Jacksonville NAS s t 10 e ( Firestone Rd S B SUWANNEE Wheat Rd o l v u d t h Jacksonville ) Ocean Pond 118th s i St NAS d Five Points Morse Ave e B Skaff l Seaboard v Ave Ave d ) COLUMBIA DISTRICT
    [Show full text]
  • The Withlacoochee River Watershed: Biophysical & Regulatory Characteristics
    The Withlacoochee River Watershed: Biophysical & Regulatory Characteristics Chad Bickerton, Susanna Blair, Anna Cathey, Byron Flagg, Hollie Hall, Dina Liebowitz, Michael Moretz, Megan Policastro & Tom Ankersen A Collaboration of the University of Florida’s Conservation Clinic and Adaptive Management of Water Resources IGERT The Withlacoochee River Watershed: Biophysical & Regulatory Characteristics Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 5 Overview ................................................................................................................................ 5 Land Use .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Water Quality .................................................................................................................................... 6 Water Quantity ................................................................................................................................. 7 Ecology ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Special Designations ...................................................................................................................... 7 Watershed Governance ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]