Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066)

Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066)

Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenario Report Prepared by September 20, 2015 Table of Contents Chapter Page EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 INTRODUCTION 13 AUTHORIZATION 13 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 BACKGROUND / PURPOSE 14 SCENARIO LOCATIONS 16 MODEL SIMULATIONS 18 SCENARIO 1: GREEN SWAMP RAILROAD BERMS 21 1.1. DESCRIPTION 21 1.2. MODEL SET-UP 23 1.3. RESULTS 25 1.4. CONCLUSION 29 SCENARIO 2: GREEN SWAMP RAILROAD BRIDGE PILINGS 30 2.1. DESCRIPTION 30 2.2. MODEL SET-UP 31 2.3. RESULTS 33 2.4. CONCLUSION 36 SCENARIO 3: GREEN SWAMP AND SR 471 37 3.1. DESCRIPTION 37 3.2. MODEL SET-UP 38 3.3. RESULTS 39 3.4. CONCLUSION 42 SCENARIO 4: HILLSBOROUGH RIVER OVERFLOW AT US 98 43 4.1. DESCRIPTION 43 4.2. MODEL SET-UP 44 4.3. RESULTS 46 4.4. CONCLUSION 47 Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenarios Report: September 2015 SCENARIO 5: BRIDGE CROSSINGS NEAR TRILBY AND LACOOCHEE 48 5.1. DESCRIPTION 48 5.2. MODEL SET-UP 50 5.3. RESULTS 51 5.4. CONCLUSION 53 SCENARIO 6: LAKE ORIOLE 54 6.1. DESCRIPTION 54 6.2. MODEL SET-UP 56 6.3. RESULTS 57 6.4. CONCLUSION 61 SCENARIO 7: WYSONG-COOGLER WATER CONSERVATION STRUCTURE 62 7.1. DESCRIPTION 62 7.2. MODEL SETUP 65 7.3. RESULTS 65 7.4. CONCLUSION 70 SCENARIO 8: FLOOD STORAGE 71 8.1. DESCRIPTION 71 8.2. MODEL SETUP 72 8.3. RESULTS 73 8.4. CONCLUSION 74 SCENARIO 9: WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER HIGH INITIAL WATER LEVEL COMPARISONS 75 9.1. DESCRIPTION 75 9.2. MODEL SETUP 76 9.3. RESULTS 79 9.4. CONCLUSION 83 SCENARIO 10: FLYING EAGLE BERM IN TSALA APOPKA 84 10.1. DESCRIPTION 84 10.2. MODEL SET-UP 86 10.3. RESULTS 87 10.4. CONCLUSION 92 Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenarios Report: September 2015 SCENARIO 11: TSALA APOPKA PRE-SETTLEMENT CONDITIONS 93 11.1. DESCRIPTION 93 11.2. MODEL SETUP 94 11.3. RESULTS 95 11.4. CONCLUSION 101 SCENARIO 12: TSALA APOPKA AND THE ORANGE STATE CANAL 102 12.1. DESCRIPTION 102 12.2. MODEL SET-UP 103 12.3. RESULTS 105 12.4. CONCLUSION 110 SCENARIO 13: TSALA APOPKA STRUCTURE SIZES 111 13.1. DESCRIPTION 111 13.2. MODEL SETUP 113 13.3. RESULTS 115 13.4. CONCLUSION 117 SCENARIO 14: TSALA APOPKA STRUCTURE OPERATIONS 119 14.1. DESCRIPTION 119 14.2. MODEL SETUP 121 14.3. RESULTS 121 14.4. CONCLUSION 123 SCENARIO 15: TSALA APOPKA OUTFLOWS AND ARROWHEAD ESTATES 124 15.1. DESCRIPTION 124 15.2. MODEL SETUP 126 15.3. RESULTS 126 15.4. CONCLUSION 129 SCENARIO 16: GREEN SWAMP ROCK FORMATIONS 131 16.1. DESCRIPTION 131 16.2. MODEL SET-UP 132 16.3. RESULTS 134 16.4. CONCLUSION 137 Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenarios Report: September 2015 SCENARIO 17: ROCKS NEAR JUMPER CREEK 138 17.1. DESCRIPTION 138 17.2. MODEL SET-UP 141 17.3. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS 142 17.4. CONCLUSION 143 SCENARIO 18 AND 19: MODIFICATIONS TO LAKE ROUSSEAU OUTFLOW TO THE LOWER WITHLACOOCHEE 144 18.1. DESCRIPTION 144 18.2. MODEL SETUPS 145 Scenario 18: Bypass Channel Expansion 146 Scenario 19: Barge Canal 147 18.3. RESULTS 149 18.4. CONCLUSIONS 150 REFERENCES 151 APPENDIX A: SCENARIO SUMMARIES 153 Tables Page Table 1 Storm Events Simulated Rainfall Amounts .............................................................................. 19 Table 8-1 Peak stage comparison at SR 200 and Arrowhead Estates ..................................................... 74 Table 9-1 Design Storm Rainfall Amounts ............................................................................................... 76 Table 9-2 High Initial Water Levels in Tsala Apopka................................................................................ 78 Table 13-1 Differences in Flows, Water Levels and Volumes with Structure Modifications .................. 116 Table 14-1 Summary of Changes to the Tsala Apopka Pools during the Mean Annual Storm Event ..... 122 Table 14-2 Summary of Changes to the Tsala Apopka Pools during the 10-Year Storm Event .............. 122 Table 15-1 Peak Stage Comparison: S-353 Scenario ............................................................................... 127 Table 16-1 Average Water Level Increase (inches) at Locations of Simulated Rocks ............................. 135 Table 18-1 Flow and Water Level Comparison at Bypass Spillway ......................................................... 149 Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenarios Report: September 2015 Figures Page Figure 1 Withlacoochee Watershed Boundary ..................................................................................... 15 Figure 2 Location of Withlacoochee River Model Scenarios ................................................................. 17 Figure 3 Low Initial Water Level ............................................................................................................ 18 Figure 4 High Initial Water Level ........................................................................................................... 19 Figure 1-1 Green Swamp Streams and Creeks ......................................................................................... 22 Figure 1-2 Historic Railroad Berms are used Today as Access for Land Management and Recreation ... 23 Figure 1-3 Historic Berms in the Green Swamp that were Removed for this Scenario ........................... 24 Figure 1-4 Existing Topography with Berms Present (left side) and Simulated Topography with Berms Removed (right side) ............................................................................................ 25 Figure 1-5 Peak Water Level Changes from Simulated Berm Removal .................................................... 26 Figure 1-6 Comparison of Flows for the Little Withlacoochee River at SR 471 for the 2004 Hurricanes 27 Figure 1-7 Comparison of Flows for the Withlacoochee River at SR 471 for the 2004 Hurricanes.......... 28 Figure 1-8 Comparison of Combined Flows for Devils Creek and Gator Hole Slough for the 2004 Hurricanes ............................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 1-9 Flow Volume Increases (acre-feet) with Historical Railroad Berms Removed ........................ 29 Figure 2-1 Remnant Bridge Pilings across the Withlacoochee River in the Green Swamp ...................... 30 Figure 2-2 Bridge Piling Log Jams along the Withlacoochee River in the Green Swamp ......................... 31 Figure 2-3 Profile and Cross Section of Log Jam ....................................................................................... 32 Figure 2-4 Comparison of Existing Flow Obstruction (left side) and Simulated Natural Condition (right side) ............................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 2-5 Log Jam Cross Section during High Water Event ..................................................................... 34 Figure 2-6 Comparison of Water Levels Upstream of Log Jam for the Mean Annual Storm ................... 35 Figure 2-7 Comparison of Water Levels Upstream of Log Jam for the 2004 Hurricanes ......................... 35 Figure 2-8 Comparison of Low Water (left side) and High Water (right side) at a Bridge Piling Log Jam in the Green Swamp near Dade City ......................................................................... 36 Figure 3-1 Locations of Major Stream and Culvert Crossings under SR 471 in the Green Swamp .......... 37 Figure 3-2 Looking Downstream at the SR 471 Bridge Crossing on the Withlacoochee River (2008) ..... 38 Figure 3-3 Digital Terrain with and without the Footprint of SR 471 at the Little Withlacoochee River . 39 Figure 3-4 Comparison of Flows on the Withlacoochee River at SR 471 for the 100-year Storm Event . 40 Withlacoochee River Watershed Initiative (H066) Model Scenarios Report: September 2015 Figure 3-5 Comparison of Flows for the Little Withlacoochee River at SR 471 ........................................ 41 Figure 3-6 Comparison of Combined Flows for Devils Creek and Gator Hole Slough .............................. 41 Figure 3-7 Percent Difference in Total Flow Volume for the 2004 Hurricanes ........................................ 42 Figure 4-1 Location of the Hillsborough River Overflow from the Green Swamp.................................... 43 Figure 4-2 Aerial View of the US 98 Bridge Crossing on the Hillsborough River ...................................... 44 Figure 4-3 Digital Terrain of the Hillsborough River at the US 98 Bridge ................................................. 45 Figure 4-4 Comparison of the Current US 98 Bridge Opening to the Natural Flow Path (black line) ...... 46 Figure 4-5 Peak Water Level Changes (inches) from the Simulated Removal of US 98 (2004 Hurricanes) .................................................................................................................... 47 Figure 5-1 Bridges crossing the Withlacoochee River near Trilby and Lacoochee ................................... 48 Figure 5-2 Bridge over the Withlacoochee River at SR 575 ...................................................................... 49 Figure 5-3 Bridge over the Withlacoochee River at US 301 ..................................................................... 49 Figure 5-4 Flooding in Trilby, FL from High Water on the Withlacoochee River in 1933 ......................... 50 Figure 5-5 Existing Terrain with Bridges and Roadway Berms near Trilby, FL .......................................... 51 Figure 5-6 Modified Terrain with Bridges and Roadway Berms Removed in the Model ......................... 51 Figure 5-7 Upstream Side of SR 575 during the

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    172 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us