DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of RM No. 9395 Amendment of Part 73 of the Commission's Rules to Permit the Introduction of Digital Audio Broadcasting in the AM and FM Broadcast Services ) GROUP COMMENTS FILED ON BEHALF OF THE ORGANIZATIONS AND INDIVIDUALS LISTED BELOW. IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES My name is Ted M. Coopman and I am a resident of Santa Cruz, CA. I have a Master of Science in Mass Communications from San Jose State University (1995) and have been researching broadcasting since 1993. I have presented numerous papers on this subject at professional conventions held by the National Communication Association, the American Communication Association, the Western Communication Association, and the Southern States Communication Association. I have also had a manuscript published in the Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media (Vol. 43, No. 4, Fall 1999) and operate a website(www.roguecom.com/rogueradio) where I house my research on broadcasting. I am also the co-founder of Rogue Communications, a multi-service consulting and research company. In these capacities, I have become concerned with the state of radio broadcasting in the United States. Our current free radio service is threatened by media consolidation, the loss of diversity, localism, and the increased use of FM spectrum for ancillary services to the detriment of music and voice broadcasting. I have drafted his Group Comment to present the most basic issues and needs expressed by a diverse cross- section of individuals and organizations concerned with the health of radio. We, the undersigned organizations and individuals, representative of a wide spectrum of advocates for a democratic, community service oriented, free AM-FM broadcast service, strongly believe that the NPRM concerning the adoption of In Band On Channel (IBOC) terrestrial Digital Audio Broadcasting (DAB) is ill-conceived. We 1 the undersigned, urge the Commission to reject RM 9395 and explore other proven technologies for terrestrial Digital Audio Broadcasting. 1. There has been no proven public demand for the conversion of FM analog to DAB. Considering this move will make every one the of the current 500,000,000 or so radio receivers in the United States obsolete, affect virtually every US citizen, and cost consumers hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars to replace them, it would seem that national public hearings on this matter are in order before IBOC is voted on by the Commission. 2. Forcing the conversion of analog FM to DAB would prove a hardship on existing small commercial, public, and community radio stations, not to mention the many stations that will exist under the creation of a Low Power Radio Service. Many of these stations provide a vast quantity of the truly local programming and information and often operate on very tight budgets. Having to replace transmitter equipment on the whim of a few powerful companies that stand to make millions, if not billions, from selling digital transmitters is unacceptable. IBOC will result in the further consolidation of the spectrum and the extinction of many of these community stations. 3. FM analog is an accepted international standard. With the exception of Japan and some former Eastern-Bloc countries, the 87.5-108.0 MHz band is used around the world for FM audio broadcasting. The AM/FM radio can be used practically anywhere in the world. Such a global standard does not and never will exist for DAB. 4. While the undersigned support the development of a digital radio service, we feel that such a service should not be within the 76-108 MHz band. the Commission should look at core television spectrum between channels 7-13, 14-36 and 38-51 for a digital broadcasting service. Several lower bandwidth digital FM channels can be splintered between DTV channels after the transition. Either the entire VHF high band (174-216 MHz) can be dedicated to DAB or stations can be placed throughout the UHF (470-604, 610-694 MHz) band. Signals above 174 MHz are less prone to propagation, which has been known to happen in the current FM broadcast band. 5. Failing to move DAB to another band would deprive the public billions of dollars of revenue in auctioning off these frequencies. Simply granting additional spectrum to broadcasters inside the FM band for this conversion is nothing more than a give- 2 away of national resources to for-profit business interests. Moreover, the potential for FM broadcasters to deploy data systems, pager, and cell phone services using their FM bandwidth is clearly unfair competition to those services who must bid for limited frequencies and install expensive towers and other facilities. FM license holders are getting bandwidth for these services for free, again depriving the public of revenue. 6. IBOC is far from an being an efficient or proven technology. Unlike an analog signal, you either pick up a digital signal or you do not. There is no "static," no weaker signal. IBOC will reduce, not improve reception. We know from our experience with digital cellular telephones, that reception of digital signals are marginal in mountainous areas. Service to remote areas must be maintained. 7. DAB technology is something that will have to prove itself and should not be an imposed standard. Just like compact discs and DTV, DAB receivers will be extremely expensive at first but should come down in price based on public acceptance. DAB may fail in the US. Many technologies, such as quad, AM Stereo, Betamax for home use, IVDS, RDS and CED video discs have never gained public acceptance. As long as DAB is marketed correctly, it will obtain limited public acceptance. However, this should not be done by disrupting the current analog FM service. Moreover, the Commission should not give special dispensation to analog broadcasters by imposing standards while letting other technologies succeed or fail on their own merits. 8. IBOC will interfere with the implementation of the Low Power Radio Service and bar entrants to the market. Unlike IBOC, the proposed Low Power Radio Service has wide public and institutional support and drew more public commentary than any NPRM in Commission history. This ground swell of diverse support clearly places locally focused, locally programmed, and locally controlled community radio as a priority. Assigning extra bandwidth for IBOC will impede the implementation of LPFM and will further encourage consolidation, which presents a barrier to most new entrants. 9. In the event that the FCC decides to adopt one of the proposed IBOC systems and assigns extra bandwidth, these stations should not be allowed to keep this extra allotted bandwidth after the full conversion to digital. ANY extra bandwidth beyond that needed for the transmission of the stations primary signal and interference adjacents should be returned to the FCC to allow for more entrants into the market. 3 10. Any question of the possible conflict between IBOC and LPFM should not be whether LPFM interferes with IBOC, but if IBOC interferes with LPFM. The demand for LPFM is clear, there is no proven public demand for IBOC. 11. In the event that the Commission elects to establish DAB off the normal band, we strongly suggest that 50% of such spectrum be reserved for non-commercial educational services. 12. Under no circumstances should FM analog license holders be given frequencies or allotted special status in the auction process for a dedicated DAB band. However, we do suggest that if these license holders wish to trade their FM frequencies on a 1 to 1 basis for digital frequencies that they should be allowed to do so, as long as the traded FM frequencies are totally allocated to the further creation of low power radio stations. 13. Industry experts say that by 2003 more than 600 million people will be accessing the internet from mobile devices compared to 550 million using desktop computers. This will enable current analog FM broadcasters, many of which already "webcast" their signals, to compete with DAB even if they elect to not purchase frequencies on a designated DAB Band. It is premature to move to an IBOC style conversion without taking into account this type of technology. 14. Conversion of FM analog to IBOC will further erode the "free public service" aspect of radio. Currently, the trend has been to use more and more bandwidth for ancillary services not for use for free by the general public. This is inconsistent with the traditional use and purpose of radio. This will only accelerate under any IBOC style conversion. This will allow FM license holders to unfairly compete with digital pager and other services who are held to stricter standards for obtaining frequencies. 15. IBOC is unnecessary as the bandwidth and technology to broadcast already exists and is currently in use. Ancillary services that are currently granted to FM license holders as "bonuses" to their frequencies (and are used to carry services such as paging), and are without specific authorization by the Commission, already transmit data via the Radio Data System. FM license holders are not legally entitled to the use of this bandwidth for these purposes. Since 1979 broadcasters have had the technology to send nonaudio information out to radios for emergency traffic or weather alerts, banner ads on the face of your radio, or an announcement of the song and artist. This bandwidth is already sufficient to allow for DAB without allotting 4 extra bandwidth. The loss of any officially unauthorized ancillary services offered by incumbent broadcasters is immaterial. Businesses are often put in the position to choose between offering competing services. Let these broadcasters make these choices and pay the consequences for them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Radio Wave Spectrum Allocations and Dial Markings on Old Radios – Page 1
    Radio Wave Spectrum Allocations and Dial Markings on Old Radios – page 1 When you look at the dial of an old radio you may be confused by the numbers and letters written on the dial. In Australia and New Zealand the dials of Medium Wave radios (often called the Broadcast Band) were usually marked with the station call signs. In Australia, if the dial scale was quite small, a radio would only have the stations in that state marked on the dial. Some radios also had the Frequency and/or the Wave Length marked but this was not common throught period from 1936 to the end of the Australian made radios. Medium Wave Broadcast Band This is the band we tune to when we listen to an AM radio and most countries use frequency allocations between 526.5KHz and 1705KHz. Not all countries use all this allocation. Stereo transmission is possible and has been offered by some stations in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, the Dominican Republic, Paraguay, Australia, The Philippines, Japan, South Korea, South Africa, and France. However, there are multiple standards for AM stereo with C-QUAM being the most common in the United States as well as other countries, and receivers that implement the technologies are relatively rare. The FM Broadcast Band This is the range of frequencies we tune to when we tune a modern FM radio receiver. The international frequency allocation for this band is now 87.5MHz to 108MHz. This is often referred to as the CCIR Band. Over the years some countries have used other frequencies for this band and you will see these on the dials of some old FM radios you may find from time to time.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for FM Broadcast Standards
    TECHNICAL GUIDELINES FOR FM BROADCAST STANDARDS Directorate of Technical Regulations February 2014 94, Kairaba Avenue, P. O. Box 4230 Bakau, The Gambia Tel. (220) 4399601 / 4399606 Fax: (220) 4399905 EMail: [email protected] Website: www.pura.gm Contents 1. DEFINITIONS ........................................................................................................................... 2 2. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 3 3. CLASSES OF FM BROADCAST STATIONS ........................................................................ 3 3.1 Public/Commercial FM station .................................................................................................. 3 3.2 Community Fm Stations ............................................................................................................. 3 3.3 Educational/Scientific FM station [Non Commercial] ............................................................... 3 4. FREQUENCY SPACING .......................................................................................................... 3 5. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................. 4 5.1 Safety Requirements ................................................................................................................... 4 5.2 Transmitting Facilities ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Radio Power Increase
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Digital Audio Broadcasting Systems ) MM Docket No. 99-325 And Their Impact On the Terrestrial Radio ) Broadcast Service ) ) COMMENTS OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCASTERS The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB)1 hereby responds to the Public Notice2 soliciting public comment on recent filings in the digital audio broadcasting proceeding. By this Notice, the Media Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is seeking comment on three filings: a request by 18 radio broadcasters and the four largest manufacturers of broadcast transmission equipment (Joint Parties) to permit a voluntary increase in digital power for FM digital broadcasters, up to a maximum of 10 percent of a station’s authorized analog power;3 a technical report by iBiquity Digital Corporation (iBiquity) examining the benefits of this proposed increase in digital power, the compatibility with analog broadcasting and the potential interference effects 1 The National Association of Broadcasters is a trade association that advocates on behalf of more than 8,300 free, local radio and television stations and also broadcast networks before Congress, the Federal Communications Commission and the Courts. 2 Public Notice, DA 08-2340, MM Docket No. 99-325, October 23, 2008. 3 Joint Parties Ex Parte letter, filed in MM Docket No. 99-325, June 10, 2008 (Joint Parties request). resulting from the proposed increase;4 and a study by National Public Radio (NPR) on Corporation for Public Broadcasting-supported research on digital radio coverage and interference.5 As discussed below, the benefits of permitting FM broadcasters to optionally increase the power in their digital signal are compelling.
    [Show full text]
  • Shortwave-Listening
    Listen to global news in the making! Monitor transmissions from Voice of America. Radio Canada, Radio Netherlands. Radio Moscow and many others. Learn how radio waves tra- vel. Get information on popular shortwave bands and licensing for a Itypes of equipment. Radio Listener's Guide by William Barden, Jr. Radio Shack A Division of Tandy Corporation First Edition First Printing-1987 Copyright01987 by William Barden Jr., Inc. Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. Reproduction or use, without express permission, of editorial or pictorial content, in any manner, is prohibited. No patent liability is assumed with respect to the use of the information contained herein. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: XX-XXXXX Radio Listener's Guide T Table of Contents Section I World of the BBC, Radio Moscow, Police Calls, Aircraft Communications, and Hams Chapter 1. Radio—What Is It' Generating Radio Waves—The Radio Spectrum—Radio Equipment and Frequencies—Band Use—How Radio Waves Travel—Radio Licenses and Listening—Subbands and Channels—Radio Equipment Chapter 2. Types of Broadcasting Voice Communication—Code Transmission—Teleprinter Transmission— Facsimile Transmission—Slow-Scan Television—Fast-Scan Television — Repeaters— Portable Phones—Satellite Reception—Transmitting Power Chapter 3. Shortwave Broadcasters Frequency Assignments—The European Long-Wave Band—The AM Broadcast Band—Tropical Broadcasting-49- and 41-Meter Bands-31- and 25-Meter Bands—Above the 25-Meter Band—A Typical Listening Session—Logging Foreign Stations—Foreign Broadcast lnformation—QSL Cards Chapter 4. Other Types of Broadcasting in the Lower Frequencies Transmissions Below the AM Broadcast Band—The AM Broadcast Band— Portable Phones—Marine Transmissions—CW Transmissions—Radio Teleprinter—Single Sideband—Time and Frequency Signals—Weather Maps by Facsimile—Citizen's Band Frequencies—The Russian Woodpecker—Pirate and Clandestine Stations Chapter 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Kidsdictionary.Pdf
    Access Charges: This is a fee charged by local phone companies for use of their networks. Amplitude Modulation (AM) that's the "AM" Band on your Radio: A signaling method that varies the amplitude of the carrier frequencies to send information. The carrier frequency would be like 910 (kHz) AM on your AM dial. Your radio antenna receives this signal and then decodes it and plays the song. Analog Signal: A signaling method that modifies the frequency by amplifying the strength of the signal or varying the frequency of a radio transmission to convey information. Bandwidth The amount of data passing through a connection over a given time. It is usually measured in bps (bits-per- second) or Mbps. Broadband Broadband refers to telecommunication in which a wide band of frequencies is available to transmit information. More services can be provided through broadband in the same way as more lanes on a highway allow more cars to travel on it at the same time. Broadcast To transmit (a radio or television program) for public or general use. In other words, send out or communicate, especially by radio or television. Cable A strong, large-diameter, heavy steel or fiber rope. The word history of cable derives from Middle English, from Old North French, from Late Latin capulum, lasso, from Latin capere, meaning to seize. Calling Party Pays A billing method in which a wireless phone caller pays only for making calls and not for receiving them. The standard American billing system requires wireless phone customers to pay for all calls made and received on a wireless phone.
    [Show full text]
  • 750 Review Insert
    The Eton Elite 750 is much more than just a fancy-looking boom-box shortwave receiver, reports WB6NOA, who listened to all it has to offer, including longwave, shortwave, the AM and FM broadcast bands, and the VHF air band. CQ Reviews: Eton Elite 750 Shortwave Receiver BY GORDON WEST,* WB6NOA s ham operators, we know not to pre-judge a radio by just how it Alooks, or how many buttons and meters it may have on the face. Like many of you, I have a collection of no- name bargain mail-order portable shortwave (SW) receivers, but few can hold a candle to those from name-brand manufacturers. Now, this monster- sized Eton receiver is hitting the mar- ket in grand style. The Eton Elite 750 is major-sized multi-mode receiver, fun for a radio enthusiast wanting to tune in what’s out there from 100 kHz to 30 MHz, plus the AM and FM broadcast bands and AM air-band reception. The Eton name may be unfamiliar to you, and the 750 looks a lot like a pre- vious radio from Grundig. Actually, the two companies have a relationship that spans 35 years, as explained by Eton CEO and Chairman Esmail Amid- The large speaker makes the Eton Elite 750 a great poolside or beach enter- Hozour. “From our initial partnership tainment radio, too! Plenty of audio output, enough to also power a personal with Max Grundig in 1979, Eton has car- music player that can plug in. ried on Grundig’s 75+ year legacy in developing the best-in-class world band we bring new and exciting shortwave non-directional radio beacons (NDBs), radios.” Esmail continued, “Eton’s dedi- products to the market each year.” Navtex, 630-meter ham radio CW bea- cation to design and innovation spans cons, and various government stations partnerships with Drake to ensure high- Exploring the Elite 750 lurking down here.
    [Show full text]
  • Audio Level Equalization of Television Sound, Broadcast FM and National Weather Service FM Radio Signals
    Europaisches Patentamt European Patent Office © Publication number: 0 512 374 A1 Office europeen des brevets EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION © Application number: 92107242.7 int. CI 5= H04N 5/60, H04B 1/16 @ Date of filing: 28.04.92 © Priority: 06.05.91 US 695803 F-92400 Courbevoie(FR) @ Date of publication of application: @ Inventor: Kim, Yong Hyun 11.11.92 Bulletin 92/46 Blk 127, Pasir Ris St.11, 04-395 Singapore 1851(SG) © Designated Contracting States: DE FR GB IT 0 Representative: Einsel, Robert, Dipl.-lng. © Applicant: THOMSON CONSUMER Deutsche Thomson-Brandt GmbH Patent- ELECTRONICS S.A. und Lizenzabteilung Gottinger Chaussee 76 9, Place des Vosges, La Defense 5 W-3000 Hannover 91 (DE) © Audio level equalization of television sound, broadcast FM and national weather service FM radio signals. © A television receiver includes a single tuner (102) for tuning both television channels and broadcast FM stations. The tuner (102) serves as the first conversion stage of a double conversion FM receiver, a separate mixer-oscillator (180) converts the FM radio sound IF to 4.5 MHz for processing in the television receiver's sound channel. A single discriminator circuit (130) is employed for tuning FM radio signals having a first deviation, such as broadcast FM radio signals, and FM signals having a second deviation (i.e., the television sound signals), and FM radio signals having a third deviation, such as signals of an information service, such as in the United States, the National Weather Service. Circuitry (136,137) for amplifying the output signal of the discriminator circuit exhibits a first gain, and a first volume control range when amplifying FM signals having the first deviation, exhibits a second gain and the first volume control range, when amplifying FM signals having the second deviation, and exhibits a second gain, and a second volume control range when amplifying FM signals having the third deviation.
    [Show full text]
  • I Would to Thank the Commission for Issuing This Notice of Proposed
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the matter of ) ) Revitalization of the AM Radio Service ) MB Docket No. 13-249 To: The Commission COMMENT BY BRIAN J. HENRY I hold a Lifetime FCC General Class Radiotelephone license as well as an Amateur Advanced Class license and have been a broadcast engineer since the late 1970’s. I have constructed, repaired, and maintained countless AM broadcast stations over the course of my career and I am a former AM broadcast station licensee (KLLK-Willits, California). I am the proprietor of Henry Communications, a company that I founded in 1978, to provide technical services to the radio and television broadcast industry. I currently do not have an interest in any broadcast property. I am participating in this proceeding because I am passionate about AM broadcasting and I want to help revitalize it. I. Introduction I would like to thank The Commission for issuing this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking as it attempts to mitigate some of its concerns regarding the long-term viability of the AM broadcast band. The AM broadcast industry needs your help and guidance. Every ten years or so “AM Improvement” becomes a priority in the broadcast industry. It is always the same. There needs to be further deregulation. I would like to suggest that deregulation has gone far enough and that a certain amount of re-regulation and stricter enforcement of the existing laws could be helpful in the effort to revitalize AM. I am concerned that the proposals that The Commission is considering may ultimately result in a degradation of AM quality and will not be an enhancement to the service.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Broadcasting Equipment Catalog
    Radio Broadcasting Equipment Catalog Digital and Analog equipment Best Audio Quality with maximum AC Efficiency “Tailor-made” customized Turnkey Solutions One size doesn’t fit all 4 Radio Broadcasting Equipment Radio Broadcasting Equipment 5 Radio & TV Broadcasting Equipment 40 years of experience Our difference +160 Countries The unique way we mix together our ingredients in order to offer you the best specific solution for + 50,000 Radio & TV Projects your unique and specific project. + 20,000 Transmitters Installed Millions of People Connected dbbroadcast.com 6 Radio Broadcasting Equipment Radio Broadcasting Equipment 7 Main Benefits The highest AC efficiency Radio products and solutions The outstanding AC efficiency is made possible thanks to the optimized RF design –Green RF™ - combined with the last generation LDMOS active components, that allows the highest DC to RF efficiency and very low lossesmatching circuits and combining systems. DB is leader in FM digital and analog broadcasting products. In more than 40 years we design The new switch-mode power supplies, with over 94% efficiency, contribute reaching top our products to offer to broadcasting operators the best quality of audio signal while providing efficiency performance. the maximum AC efficiency, dramatically reducing energy costs. Moreover, the top-level AC efficiency is reached over a very wide range of power, thanks to the The GREEN RF™ technology, combined with the new 65:1 devices, is the latest evolution of the smart Automatic Level Control system that acts on internal parameters of the amplifier. world-famous DB patented COLD-FET™ technology, already present in DB’s FM transmitters. Rugged and Long lasting Reliability PFG and Mozart Series, the new line of FM transmitters and exciters, have been awarded some of the industry’s most prestigious technology honors, the Best of Show Award at both NAB Show Each product has been designed to give broadcasters a very reliable, long-lasting equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations on Issues Related to Digital Radio Broadcasting in India 1St February, 2018 Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan Jawahar
    Recommendations on Issues related to Digital Radio Broadcasting in India 1st February, 2018 Mahanagar Doorsanchar Bhawan Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg New Delhi-110002 Website: www.trai.gov.in i Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2: Digital Radio Broadcasting Technologies and International Scenario .............................................................................................................. 5 CHAPTER 3: Issues Related to Digitization of FM Radio Broadcasting .............. 15 CHAPTER 4: Summary of Recommendations .................................................... 40 ii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Radio remains an integral part of India‟s rich culture, social and economic landscape. Radio broadcasting1 is one of the most popular and affordable means for mass communication, largely owing to its wide coverage, low set up costs, terminal portability and affordability. 1.2 At present, analog terrestrial radio broadcast in India is carried out in Medium Wave (MW) (526–1606 KHz), Short Wave (SW) (6–22 MHz), and VHF-II (88–108 MHz) spectrum bands. VHF-II band is popularly known as FM band due to deployment of Frequency Modulation (FM) technology in this band. AIR - the public service broadcaster - has established 467 radio stations encompassing 662 radio transmitters, which include 140 MW, 48 SW, and 474 FM transmitters for providing radio broadcasting services2. It also provides overseas broadcasts services for its listeners across the world. 1.3 Until 2000, AIR was the sole radio broadcaster in the country. In the year 2000, looking at the changing market dynamics, the government took an initiative to open the FM radio broadcast for private sector participation. In Phase-I of FM Radio, the government auctioned 108 FM radio channels in 40 cities. Out of these, only 21 FM radio channels became operational and subsequently migrated to Phase-II in 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • A 300 W Power Amplifier for the 88 to 108 Mhz FM Broadcast Band
    High Frequency Design From April 2008 High Frequency Electronics Copyright © 2008 Summit Technical Media LLC LDMOS FM AMPLIFIER A 300 W Power Amplifier for the 88 to 108 MHz FM Broadcast Band By Antonio Eguizabal Freescale Semiconductor he intention of this This article describes an FM article is to present band power amplifier, Ta 300 watt single- including circuit design, ended RF power amplifi- thermal considerations, er for the FM broadcast construction notes and per- band, used in small to formance measurements medium radio stations in which economy and flexi- bility are important to the user. With the recent availability of low cost overmolded plastic LDMOS RF power amplifi- er transistors, such as the Freescale family of MRF6VXXXXN devices, it is possible to design Figure 1 · Assembled test fixture (top view). and build a low cost, compact, broadband power amplifier offering simplicity and relia- bility. area and ERP has a minimum field strength In this article, an RF power amplifier using of 70 dBµV or 3.16 mV/m [2]. the low cost OMP Freescale MRF6V2300N LDMOS transistor is presented (photo in Introduction Figure 1). It operates at Vdd = 50 VDC with an The Freescale MRF6V2300N is a 10 to 450 average drain efficiency in excess of 60% and MHz 300 W LDMOS RF transistor in a TO- a gain of 24 dB with a 1 dB gain flatness over 272 WB plastic package featuring 25.5 dB the 88 MHz to 108 MHz band. No tuning is gain and 68% efficiency at 220 MHz, operating required as the amplifier is broadband.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob's Techtalk
    BTT rev. new! Bob’s TechTalk #46 Frequency modulation is the process of send- ing information by modulating the carrier fre- Bob’s TechTalk quency of the broadcast energy. The amplitude is not modulated. The FCC defines 100% modu- lation on the FM broadcast band as a frequency deviation of ±75 kHz. Number 46 by Bob Eckweiler, AF6C Pre-emphasis: FM has an advantage for high fidelity radio transmission because most radio noise appears How FM Stereo Works: as amplitude variations which are ignored by the For last month’s RF I wrote a Heathkit of the FM reception process. However, background Month article on the AJ-14 Stereo FM Tuner. noise is still a problem when transmitting and This tuner came out in mid-1965, not too many receiving high fidelity audio. Since this noise is years after FM Stereo broadcasting became more prominent at the higher audio frequencies common. As I wrote the article, I realized it the higher audio frequencies are “emphasized” would be too long if I used the opportunity to by passing them through a high-pass filter prior also describe how stereo is broadcast so the two to modulating the carrier to raise their signal-to- channels can be separated at the receive end. noise ratio. This filter has a knee frequency of The solution was to write this separate techni- 2.12 kHz representing a 3 dB boost, increasing 6 cal article. Someone once said that if you want dB per octave; at 15 kHz the boost is about 17 dB. to understand something, teach it.
    [Show full text]