DOCSLIB.ORG

A Preliminary Study on the Ornamentation Patterns of Ganoid Scales in Some Mesozoic Actinopterygian Fishes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291973377 A preliminary study on the ornamentation patterns of ganoid scales in some Mesozoic actinopterygian fishes Article in Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana · December 2015 DOI: 10.4435/BSPI.2015.14 CITATIONS READS 0 206 2 authors: Claudio Garbelli Andrea Tintori Nanging Institute of Geology and paleontolo… University of Milan 14 PUBLICATIONS 36 CITATIONS 118 PUBLICATIONS 1,487 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Middle Triassic fishes across the Tethys View project All content following this page was uploaded by Andrea Tintori on 06 February 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. TO L O N O G E I L C A A P I ' T A A T L E I I A Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 54 (3), 2015, 219-228. Modena C N O A S S. P. I. A preliminary study on the ornamentation patterns of ganoid scales in some Mesozoic actinopterygian fishes Claudio GARBELLI & Andrea TINTORI C. Garbelli, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra “Ardito Desio”, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Mangiagalli, 2, 20122 Milano, Italy; claudio. [email protected] A. Tintori, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra “Ardito Desio”, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Mangiagalli, 2, 20122 Milano, Italy; andrea.tintori@ unimi.it KEY WORDS - Ganoid scales, basal actinopterygians, ornamentation, squamation pattern. ABSTRACT - Ganoid scales are one of the most common remains of vertebrates in the fossil record of Paleozoic and Mesozoic. Their knowledge is important for the understanding of the paleobiology and evolution of actinopterygian fishes. The distinctive feature of these scales is the outermost shiny layer of ganoine, an hyper-mineralized enamel-like tissue. During the Mesozoic, ganoid scales show a great variety of shapes and very different patterns of ornamentation made of ganoine. The surface of scales may be from smooth to very ornamented, with a relief arranged in tubercles, ridges, grooves or a combination of them. Here we present a preliminary study on the squamation of some Mesozoic non-teleost actinopterygians in order to test the association between body shape and ganoine ornamentation. Using several morphological descriptors, we built an empirical morphospace to compare ganoid scales ornamentation. The use of a quantitative method to describe scales allows to test if there is a meaningful correlation between body shape and ganoine ornamentation in non-teleost actinopterygians. We found an important association between body shape and scale ornamentation in the taxa under investigation. In particular, deep-bodied fishes bear a more complex and variegate ornamentation than fusiform ones. This finding has important implications in our understanding of non-teleost actinopterygians paleobiology. Since swimming activity is a primary function for fish and this is performed by the body acting as an integrated unit, the correlation between body shape and ganoine ornamentation could be related to hydrodynamics. A quantitative test of this hypothesis, however, would be desirable. RIASSUNTO - [Studio preliminare sugli schemi ornamentali delle scaglie ganoidi in alcuni pesci Attinopterigi del Mesozoico] - Le scaglie ganoidi sono uno dei più importanti e diffusi resti di vertebrati nel record fossile del Paleozoico e del Mesozoico. La loro conoscenza è importante per capire la paleobiologia e l’evoluzione dei pesci Attinopterigi. Il carattere distintivo di queste scaglie è la copertura esterna che è costituita dalla ganoina, un tessuto iper-mineralizzato simile allo smalto. Nel Mesozoico, le scaglie ganoidi sono estremamente differenziate e mostrano quindi una grande variabilità di forme e ornamentazioni prodotte dalla ganoina. La superficie delle scaglie può essere da liscia a fortemente ornata, con un micro-rilievo organizzato in tubercoli, creste, scanalature e dentellature, od una combinazione di essi. In questo lavoro abbiamo studiato le scaglie di alcuni Attinopterigi non-teleostei del Mesozoico, per verificare se esiste una relazione tra la forma del corpo e l’ornamentazione prodotta dalla ganoina. Utilizzando alcuni descrittori morfologici, abbiamo costruito un morfospazio empirico per confrontare le scaglie in termini di morfologia ed ornamentazione. L’uso di un metodo quantitativo per descrivere le scaglie ha permesso di verificare se c’è una correlazione significativa tra la forma del corpo e l’ornamentazione delle scaglie nei pesci Attinopterigii non-telostei. Abbiamo trovato un’associazione importante tra forma del corpo e descrittori morfologici delle scaglie nei casi studiati. In particolare, i pesci cosiddetti “deep-bodied” possiedono un’ornamentazione delle scaglie più complessa e differenziata di quella delle specie fusiformi. Questa osservazione ha delle importanti implicazioni per la nostra comprensione della paleobiologia dei pesci Attinopterigi non-teleostei. Infatti, siccome l’attività del nuoto è una funzione primaria per i pesci ed è attuata dall’organismo come se il corpo fosse un’unità integrata, la correlazione tra forma del corpo e ornamentazione della ganoina potrebbe essere relazionata all’idrodinamica. In futuro, un test quantitativo per verificare questa ipotesi sarebbe auspicabile. INTRODUCTION potentially provide flexural constrains (Gemballa & Bartsch, 2002). The ganoid scales are a synapomorphic groundplan During the Paleozoic and Mesozoic and before the feature of ray-finned fishes, the Actinopterygii (Schultze, vast teleostean radiation, ganoid scales were the common 1977; Patterson, 1982), and these structures showed a type of body covering among lower actinopterygians much greater amount of variability in deep time. Today, and their morphology was greatly variable, if compared only Polypteridae and Lepisosteidae retain ganoid scales with the scales of Polypteridae and Lepisosteidae (e.g., and their study allowed biologists and paleontologists Trinajstic, 1999a, b; Chen et al., 2012). This variability to clarify morpho-functional aspects of this kind of encompasses features such as the general shape of “exoskeleton”. Ganoid scales of these modern groups scales and the microrilief of ganoine covering, usually have several functional implications for swimming, such called “ornamentation”. Compared to the homogeneous as enhanced station-holding (Webb et al., 1992), control aspect of modern ganoid scales, primitive groups of of body stiffness and undulatory wave motion during actinopterygians show a much higher variability in terms steady swimming (Long et al., 1996); these are designed of scales shape and ornamentation of ganoine. The scales to permit extreme body curvatures in spite to the rigid from fossil record exhibit a rhomboid to very elongate structure of ganoid scales in the basal actinopterygian outline, from subcircular to squared. Their posterior fishes, structured with peg-and-socket articulation, which margin may be from smooth to serrated and their surface ISSN 0375-7633 doi:10.4435/BSPI.2015.14 220 Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 54 (3), 2015 may be from smooth to highly ornamented, with a a complete ganoid squamation were investigated: microsculpture composed of longitudinal or transversal Paralepidotus ornatus Agassiz, 1843 (according to Tintori, ridges, isolated tubercles, crests and grooves. The meaning 1996); Gabanellia agilis Tintori & Lombardo, 1996; of these characters is not fully understood and some Stoppania gaetanii Lombardo et al., 2008; Felberia excelsa speculative hypotheses were proposed, mainly involving Lombardo & Tintori, 2004; Endennia licia Lombardo & functions related to swimming (Aleyev, 1977). One of the Brambillasca, 2005; Semiolepis brembanus Lombardo & most widespread ideas is that the surface roughness of fish Tintori, 2008; Dapedium politum Leach in De La Beche, skin may have some hydrodynamics functions related to 1822; Dapedium noricum Tintori, 1983; Sargodon tomicus delaying the boundary layer separation or to the reduction Plieninger, 1847; Ptycholepis gracilis Davis, 1884; of skin friction drag (Fletcher et al., 2014). The boundary Ptycholepis bollensis Agassiz, 1833; Eugnathus philpotae layer separation can easily occur across smooth surfaces Agassiz, 1843; Luoxiongichthys hyperdorsalis Wen et in regions of adverse pressure gradient, but experimental al., 2012; Allolepidotus bellottii De Alessandri, 1910; measures suggest that there is no separation (Anderson Bobasatrania sp. White, 1932; Asialepidotus sp. Su, 1959. et al., 2001). The scales with ridges and grooves may Specimens belonging to these taxa were selected possibly promote the formation of microflows (Sudo et for study on the basis of quality preservation of their al., 2002). This could be consistent with the generation squamation pattern and scale morphology. The selected of a turbulent boundary layer in which the separation is specimens are deposited in the following museums: delayed, if compared to a laminar boundary layer. Some Museo di Paleontologia del Dipartimento di Scienze della authors argued that ganoine ornamentation could have Terra“ A. Desio”, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy performed this function in extinct fishes (Burdak, 1986). (acronym MPUM); Museo Civico di Storia
Recommended publications
  • Lecture 6 – Integument ‐ Scale • a Scale Is a Small Rigid Plate That Grows out of an Animal’ S Skin to Provide Protection

    Lecture 6 – Integument ‐ Scale • a Scale Is a Small Rigid Plate That Grows out of an Animal’ S Skin to Provide Protection

    Lecture 6 – Integument ‐ Scale • A scale is a small rigid plate that grows out of an animal’s skin to provide protection. • Scales are quite common and have evolved multiple times with varying structure and function. • Scales are generally classified as part of an organism's integumentary system. • There are various types of scales according to shape and to class of animal. • Although the meat and organs of some species of fish are edible by humans, the scales are usually not eaten. Scale structure • Fish scales Fish scales are dermally derived, specifically in the mesoderm. This fact distinguishes them from reptile scales paleontologically. Genetically, the same genes involved in tooth and hair development in mammals are also involved in scale development. Earliest scales – heavily armoured thought to be like Chondrichthyans • Fossil fishes • ion reservoir • osmotic control • protection • Weighting Scale function • Primary function is protection (armor plating) • Hydrodynamics Scales are composed of four basic compounds: ((gmoving from inside to outside in that order) • Lamellar bone • Vascular or spongy bone • Dentine (dermis) and is always associated with enamel. • Acellular enamel (epidermis) • The scales of fish lie in pockets in the dermis and are embeded in connective tissue. • Scales do not stick out of a fish but are covered by the Epithelial layer. • The scales overlap and so form a protective flexible armor capable of withstanding blows and bumping. • In some catfishes and seahorses, scales are replaced by bony plates. • In some other species there are no scales at all. Evolution of scales Placoid scale – (Chondricthyes – cartilagenous fishes) develop in dermis but protrude through epidermis.
  • The Strawberry Bank Lagerstätte Reveals Insights Into Early Jurassic Lifematt Williams, Michael J

    The Strawberry Bank Lagerstätte Reveals Insights Into Early Jurassic Lifematt Williams, Michael J

    XXX10.1144/jgs2014-144M. Williams et al.Early Jurassic Strawberry Bank Lagerstätte 2015 Downloaded from http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on September 27, 2021 2014-144review-articleReview focus10.1144/jgs2014-144The Strawberry Bank Lagerstätte reveals insights into Early Jurassic lifeMatt Williams, Michael J. Benton &, Andrew Ross Review focus Journal of the Geological Society Published Online First doi:10.1144/jgs2014-144 The Strawberry Bank Lagerstätte reveals insights into Early Jurassic life Matt Williams1, Michael J. Benton2* & Andrew Ross3 1 Bath Royal Literary and Scientific Institution, 16–18 Queen Square, Bath BA1 2HN, UK 2 School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BU, UK 3 National Museum of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EH1 1JF, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Strawberry Bank Lagerstätte provides a rich insight into Early Jurassic marine vertebrate life, revealing exquisite anatomical detail of marine reptiles and large pachycormid fishes thanks to exceptional preservation, and especially the uncrushed, 3D nature of the fossils. The site documents a fauna of Early Jurassic nektonic marine animals (five species of fishes, one species of marine crocodilian, two species of ichthyosaurs, cephalopods and crustaceans), but also over 20 spe- cies of insects. Unlike other fossil sites of similar age, the 3D preservation at Strawberry Bank provides unique evidence on palatal and braincase structures in the fishes and reptiles. The age of the site is important, documenting a marine ecosystem during recovery from the end-Triassic mass extinction, but also exactly coincident with the height of the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event, a further time of turmoil in evolution.
  • 1 Lab External Morphology and Taxonomy

    1 Lab External Morphology and Taxonomy

    External Morphology Gross Anatomy: Fins Dorsal & Taxonomy Caudal Lab 1 Anal Pectoral Pelvic 1. Median fins (dorsal, anal, adipose, caudal) 2. Paired fins (pectoral and pelvic) – abdominal vs. thoracic placement 3. Fish use different fins for locomotion (wrasses use pectorals, triggerfish use median fins, tunas use caudal fins) 4. Fins are constructed of either radial cartilage (sharks) or bony rays (most fishes) Caudal Fin Shape Body Shape body shape can predict ecology: • fusiform tend to be fast swimming and inhabit the upper portions of the water column • compressed tend to be good maneuvers • elongate tend to be good accelerators Caudal fin shape can predict fish ecology (ambush • anguilliform and globiform tend to be poor swimmers and benthic predator, continuous swimmer, burst swimmer, benthic dweller, etc.) • depressed tend to be benthic Mouth Morphology Eyes Mouth morphology can be used to infer what types of prey are eaten (piscivores, planktivores, invertebrate eaters, herbivores, etc.) and where in the water column the prey are consumed Inferior Subterminal 1. placement and size may indicate something about the ecology of the fish 2. some fish (e.g., mudskippers) are adapted to see both in and outside of water 3. stalked eyes in deepwater fish are one adaptation to gather light Terminal Superior 1 Countershading Lateral Line • countershading is a feature common to most fish, especially those that inhabit the surface and midwater • fish are dark on the dorsal region and light on the ventral region • functions as camouflage in open water 1. lateral line extends along the midsection of the fish 2. can be continuous or broken 3.
  • Threat-Protection Mechanics of an Armored Fish

    Threat-Protection Mechanics of an Armored Fish

    JOURNALOFTHEMECHANICALBEHAVIOROFBIOMEDICALMATERIALS ( ) ± available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jmbbm Research paper Threat-protection mechanics of an armored fish Juha Songa, Christine Ortiza,∗, Mary C. Boyceb,∗ a Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, RM 13­4022, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA b Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT Article history: It has been hypothesized that predatory threats are a critical factor in the protective functional design of biological exoskeletons or “natural armor”, having arisen through evolutionary processes. Here, the mechanical interaction between the ganoid armor of the predatory fish Polypterus senegalus and one of its current most aggressive threats, a Keywords: toothed biting attack by a member of its own species (conspecific), is simulated and studied. Exoskeleton Finite element analysis models of the quad­layered mineralized scale and representative Polypterus senegalus teeth are constructed and virtual penetrating biting events simulated. Parametric studies Natural armor reveal the effects of tooth geometry, microstructure and mechanical properties on its ability Armored fish to effectively penetrate into the scale or to be defeated by the scale, in particular the Mechanical properties deformation of the tooth versus that of the scale during a biting attack. Simultaneously, the role of the microstructure of the scale in defeating threats as well as providing avenues of energy dissipation to withstand biting attacks is identified. Microstructural length scale and material property length scale matching between the threat and armor is observed. Based on these results, a summary of advantageous and disadvantageous design strategies for the offensive threat and defensive protection is formulated.
  • A Comparative Study of Piscine Defense the Scales of Arapaima

    A Comparative Study of Piscine Defense the Scales of Arapaima

    Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials xx (xxxx) xxxx–xxxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jmbbm A comparative study of piscine defense: The scales of Arapaima gigas, Latimeria chalumnae and Atractosteus spatula ⁎ Vincent R. Shermana, Haocheng Quana, Wen Yangb, Robert O. Ritchiec, Marc A. Meyersa,d, a Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA b Department of Materials, ETH Zurich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland c Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California Berkeley, CA 94720, USA d Department of Nanoengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: We compare the characteristics of the armored scales of three large fish, namely the Arapaima gigas Scales (arapaima), Latimeria chalumnae (coelacanth), and Atractosteus spatula (alligator gar), with specific focus on Bioinspiration their unique structure-mechanical property relationships and their specialized ability to provide protection from Bouligand predatory pressures, with the ultimate goal of providing bio-inspiration for manmade materials. The arapaima Alligator gar has flexible and overlapping cycloid scales which consist of a tough Bouligand-type arrangement of collagen Coelacanth layers in the base and a hard external mineralized surface, protecting it from piranha, a predator with extremely Arapaima sharp teeth. The coelacanth has overlapping elasmoid scales that consist of adjacent Bouligand-type pairs, forming a double-twisted Bouligand-type structure. The collagenous layers are connected by collagen fibril struts which significantly contribute to the energy dissipation, so that the scales have the capability to defend from predators such as sharks.
  • A Synoptic Review of the Vertebrate Fauna from the “Green Series

    A Synoptic Review of the Vertebrate Fauna from the “Green Series

    A synoptic review of the vertebrate fauna from the “Green Series” (Toarcian) of northeastern Germany with descriptions of new taxa: A contribution to the knowledge of Early Jurassic vertebrate palaeobiodiversity patterns I n a u g u r a l d i s s e r t a t i o n zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität Greifswald vorgelegt von Sebastian Stumpf geboren am 9. Oktober 1986 in Berlin-Hellersdorf Greifswald, Februar 2017 Dekan: Prof. Dr. Werner Weitschies 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Ingelore Hinz-Schallreuter 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Paul Martin Sander Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: 22. Juni 2017 2 Content 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Geological and Stratigraphic Framework .................................................................................... 5 3. Material and Methods ................................................................................................................... 8 4. Results and Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Dinosaurs .................................................................................................................................. 10 4.2 Marine Reptiles .......................................................................................................................
  • Body-Shape Diversity in Triassic–Early Cretaceous Neopterygian fishes: Sustained Holostean Disparity and Predominantly Gradual Increases in Teleost Phenotypic Variety

    Body-Shape Diversity in Triassic–Early Cretaceous Neopterygian fishes: Sustained Holostean Disparity and Predominantly Gradual Increases in Teleost Phenotypic Variety

    Body-shape diversity in Triassic–Early Cretaceous neopterygian fishes: sustained holostean disparity and predominantly gradual increases in teleost phenotypic variety John T. Clarke and Matt Friedman Comprising Holostei and Teleostei, the ~32,000 species of neopterygian fishes are anatomically disparate and represent the dominant group of aquatic vertebrates today. However, the pattern by which teleosts rose to represent almost all of this diversity, while their holostean sister-group dwindled to eight extant species and two broad morphologies, is poorly constrained. A geometric morphometric approach was taken to generate a morphospace from more than 400 fossil taxa, representing almost all articulated neopterygian taxa known from the first 150 million years— roughly 60%—of their history (Triassic‒Early Cretaceous). Patterns of morphospace occupancy and disparity are examined to: (1) assess evidence for a phenotypically “dominant” holostean phase; (2) evaluate whether expansions in teleost phenotypic variety are predominantly abrupt or gradual, including assessment of whether early apomorphy-defined teleosts are as morphologically conservative as typically assumed; and (3) compare diversification in crown and stem teleosts. The systematic affinities of dapediiforms and pycnodontiforms, two extinct neopterygian clades of uncertain phylogenetic placement, significantly impact patterns of morphological diversification. For instance, alternative placements dictate whether or not holosteans possessed statistically higher disparity than teleosts in the Late Triassic and Jurassic. Despite this ambiguity, all scenarios agree that holosteans do not exhibit a decline in disparity during the Early Triassic‒Early Cretaceous interval, but instead maintain their Toarcian‒Callovian variety until the end of the Early Cretaceous without substantial further expansions. After a conservative Induan‒Carnian phase, teleosts colonize (and persistently occupy) novel regions of morphospace in a predominantly gradual manner until the Hauterivian, after which expansions are rare.
  • Semionotiform Fish from the Upper Jurassic of Tendaguru (Tanzania)

    Semionotiform Fish from the Upper Jurassic of Tendaguru (Tanzania)

    Mitt. Mus. Nat.kd. Berl., Geowiss. Reihe 2 (1999) 135-153 19.10.1999 Semionotiform Fish from the Upper Jurassic of Tendaguru (Tanzania) Gloria Arratial & Hans-Peter Schultze' With 12 figures Abstract The late Late Jurassic fishes collected by the Tendaguru expeditions (1909-1913) are represented only by a shark tooth and various specimens of the neopterygian Lepidotes . The Lepidotes is a new species characterized by a combination of features such as the presence of scattered tubercles in cranial bones of adults, smooth ganoid scales, two suborbital bones, one row of infraorbital bones, non-tritoral teeth, hyomandibula with an anteriorly expanded membranous outgrowth, two extrascapular bones, two postcleithra, and the absence of fringing fulcra on all fins. Key words: Fishes, Actinopterygii, Semionotiformes, Late Jurassic, East-Africa . Zusammenfassung Die spätoberjurassischen Fische, die die Tendaguru-Expedition zwischen 1909 und 1913 gesammelt hat, sind durch einen Haizahn und mehrere Exemplare des Neopterygiers Lepidotes repräsentiert. Eine neue Art der Gattung Lepidotes ist be- schrieben, sie ist durch eine Kombination von Merkmalen (vereinzelte Tuberkel auf den Schädelknochen adulter Tiere, glatte Ganoidschuppen, zwei Suborbitalia, eine Reihe von Infraorbitalia, nichttritoriale Zähne, Hyomandibulare mit einer membra- nösen nach vorne gerichteten Verbreiterung, zwei Extrascapularia, zwei Postcleithra und ohne sich gabelnde Fulkren auf dem Vorderrand der Flossen) gekennzeichnet. Schlüsselwörter: Fische, Actinopterygii, Semionotiformes, Oberer Jura, Ostafrika. Introduction margin, crescent shaped lateral line pore, and the number of scales in vertical and longitudinal At the excavations of the Tendaguru expeditions rows), and on the shape of teeth (non-tritoral) . (1909-1913), fish remains were collected to- However, the Tendaguru lepidotid differs nota- gether with the spectacular reptiles in sediments bly from L.
  • Who Ate the Ammonite? Activity Adapted from Earth Learning Idea, Earth Science Education Unit, Keele University

    Who Ate the Ammonite? Activity Adapted from Earth Learning Idea, Earth Science Education Unit, Keele University

    Who Ate the Ammonite? Activity adapted from Earth Learning Idea, Earth Science Education Unit, Keele University Suitable for KS2 – Year 3 rocks and fossils topic, Year 4 food chains topic The aim of this activity is for students to create a food web of Jurassic aged organisms using the feeding information provided and stickers/cut out images. Once the food web has been completed children should work out which creature could have eaten the ammonite. Learning outcomes • Understand how organisms can become fossils • Understand that different organisms lived on Earth 200 million years ago, some of which can be found as fossils. • Understand that climate, sea level and position of continents can change over millions of years. • Build up a food web in trophic levels from producer to consumer. • Realise that energy is transferred up the trophic levels from producer to consumer. • Realise that trophic levels do not equate to where the animal lives in the water column. Background information (discuss with students before starting activity) • When was the Jurassic period? • What was the climate like in Britain during this time? The Jurassic period was between 201 and 145 million years ago (Ma). At this time Britain lay between 30° - 40° north of the equator (modern day - between 50° - 60°). Its climate would’ve been much warmer and more humid. Sea levels were also higher in the Jurassic which meant that much of Britain was covered by a warm shallow sea. Can demonstrate using Jurassic paleogeography map. • How do animals turn into fossils? Fossils are the preserved remains from animals and plants that used to live on Earth.
  • A Speiballen from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of South Germany

    A Speiballen from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of South Germany

    N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh. 267/1, 117–124 Article Published online December 2012 A Speiballen from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of South Germany Detlev Thies and Rolf Bernhard Hauff with 1 figure Thies, D. & hauff, R.B. (2013): A Speiballen from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of South Ger- many. – N. Jb. Geol. Paläont. Abh., 267: 117–124; Stuttgart. Abstract: A Speiballen (regurgitated compacted mass of indigestible stomach contents) from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of Ohmden, South Germany contains remains of four specimens of the actinopterygian Dapedium sp., the specific identity of which remains obscure, and a lower jaw of a specimen identified as Lepidotes sp. A list of five suitable characters is proposed to distinguish fossil Speiballen containing specimens from other vertebrate fossils. Large, potentially piscivorous animals in the Posidonia Shale ecosystem comprise chondrichthyans (Hybodus), other actinoptery- gians (pachycormiforms) and marine reptiles (crocodilians, ichthyosaurs, plesiosaurs). Only juvenile ichthyosaurs (Stenopterygius) are known to have preyed on Dapedium. Available data are, however, insufficient to clearly identify the Speiballen producer. The heavy scale armour of basal neoptery- gians such as Dapedium undoubtedly hampered digestion of these fishes and in this way provided additional protection against predators. Key words: Jurassic, Fossillagerstätte, Holzmaden, ecosytem, predation. 1. Introduction English equivalent of the German term ‘Speiballen’ (or ‘Gewölle’, which means the same) does not seem to Speiballen are understood to be regurgitated com- exist. Burrow & Turner (2010) described an assem- pacted masses of indigestible stomach contents. They blage of skeletal element, tooth whorls and scales of are released in the form of gastric pellets through the the acanthodian Nostolepis scotica from the Early De- pharynx in contrast to faeces that represent intestinal vonian of Scotland comparable in terms of taphonomy contents that are excreted through the anus.
  • A Revision of the Pycnodontid Fish Coelodus Subdiscus Wenz 1989, from the Early Cretaceous of Montsec (Lleida, Spain)

    A Revision of the Pycnodontid Fish Coelodus Subdiscus Wenz 1989, from the Early Cretaceous of Montsec (Lleida, Spain)

    Treb. Mus. Geol. Barcelona, 8: 33-65 (1999) A revision of the pycnodontid fish Coelodus subdiscus Wenz 1989, from the Early Cretaceous of Montsec (Lleida, Spain) Jurgen KRIWET*, Francisco José POYATOARIZA** and Sylvie WENZ*** RESUMEN KRIWET, J., POYATO-ARTZA, F.J. y WENZ, S. Revision del pez pycnodóntido Coelodus subdiscus Wenz 1989, del Cretácico inferior del Montsec (Lleida, España). La revision de Coelodus subdiscus Wenz 1989 (Cretácico inferior del Montsec, Lleida) proporciona nueva información sobre su anatomIa, especialmente sobre los esqueletos craneal y caudal y sobre la cloaca. El hueso parietal presenta una exten- sión digitada, el proceso parietal, y parece constar de dos partes fusionadas, parietal y supratemporal. Se discute la identificación del hueso en el margen posterodorsal de la órbita. Descrito como dermopterótico, parece consistir en un complejo de dermopterótico más dermosfenótico. Ello se evidencia por la union en este hueso de los canales sensoriales infraorbitario y supraorbitario. Se figuran las denticiones prearticular y vomeriana, y se indica la presencia de grandes dientes branquiales con forma de gancho. Se describen en detalle, por primera vez, el esqueleto caudal, las escamas del horde del cuerpo y las que forman la cloaca. Para evitar forzar homo- logIas, adn por establecer, con los teleOsteos, se utilizan para el endoesqueleto cau- dal los términos "elementos epi- e hipocordales". Hay 4 epi- y al menos 12 ele- mentos hipocordales, y dos grandes urodermales, estrechamente articulados. Las fulcras están ausentes. La cloaca está formada por una escama diferenciada anterior y dos posteriores. Se presenta una revision taxonómica y una nueva diagnosis de Coelodus subdiscus.
  • FISH BIOLOGY (2 UNITS) This Course Is Taught by Three (3) Lecturers

    FISH BIOLOGY (2 UNITS) This Course Is Taught by Three (3) Lecturers

    LECTURE NOTE ON FIS 301 FIS 301: FISH BIOLOGY (2 UNITS) This Course is taught by three (3) lecturers – Dr. I.T Omoniyi, Dr. F.I. Adeosun and Dr. A.A. Akinyemi. The Course Synopsis is further outlined on lecture basis as follows: Lectures 1 – 3: Gross external anatomy of typical bony and cartilaginous fishes. Lectures 4 – 5: Gross internal anatomy of typical bony and cartilaginous fishes. Lectures 6 – 7: Anatomy of systems and basic functions Lectures 8 – 9: Reproductive biology treated under fecundity Lectures 10 – 12: Embryology/life history of fish. GROSS EXTERNAL ANATOMY By way of introduction, basic diagnostic features of fish need to be identified. 1. Fishes are cold blooded/poikilothermic animals i.e their body temperature varying passively in accordance with the ambient temperature (surrounding water temperature). Although, fishes as a group can tolerate wide range of temperature from just below O0C to 450C, individual species generally have a preferred or optimum as well as a more restricted temperature range. For example, salmonids inhabit water with temperature range from 0-200C. Any change within the optimum range can significant influence the biology as related to the anatomy. 2. The adoption of aquatic habit has other implications for the structure and physiology of fish. For instance, it makes the streamlining and shaping of the body an important pre-requisite 1 for success in aquatic life. The shapes range from ovoid to torpedo-like or fusiform shape. This is due to the higher density of water than air. 3. Respiration assumes a greater important through the gills when compared to terrestrial th animals because water contains 1/20 of 02 available in air.