Decision on Responsibility and on the Principles of Quantum
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES In the arbitration proceeding between RREEF Infrastructure (G.P.) Limited and RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Two Lux S.à r.l. Claimants and Kingdom of Spain Respondent ICSID Case No. ARB/13/30 DECISION ON RESPONSIBILITY AND ON THE PRINCIPLES OF QUANTUM Members of the Tribunal Professor Alain Pellet, President Professor Pedro Nikken Professor Robert Volterra Secretary of the Tribunal Mr. Gonzalo Flores Date: 30 November 2018 REPRESENTATION OF THE PARTIES Representing RREEF Infrastructure (G.P.) Representing the Kingdom of Spain: Limited and RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Two Lux S.à r.l.: c/o Ms. Judith Gill QC* c/o Mr José Manuel Gutiérrez Delgado Mr. Jeffrey Sullivan* Mr Antolín Fernández Antuña Ms. Marie Stoyanov Mr Roberto Fernández Castilla Ms. Virginia Allan Ms Patricia Froehlingsdorf Nicolás Mr. Ignacio Madalena Ms Mónica Moraleda Saceda Ms. Lauren Lindsay* Ms Elena Oñoro Saínz Mr. Tomasz Hara Ms Amaia Rivas Kortázar Ms. Stephanie Hawes Ms María José Ruíz Sánchez Mr Diego Santacruz Descartín Allen & Overy LLP Mr Javier Torres Gella One Bishops Square London E1 6AD Abogacía General del Estado United Kingdom Ministry of Justice of the Government of Spain * no longer with the firm Calle Ayala 5 28001, Madrid Spain i TABLE OF [SELECTED] ABBREVIATIONS/DEFINED TERMS ICSID Rules of Procedure for Arbitration Arbitration Rules Proceedings [2006] BDO Group Expert Economic-Financial Report BDO First Report on the RREEF Solar Thermal Plants and Wind Farms, dated 14 July 2016 BDO Group Expert Report Duplicating BDO Report duplicating Brattle’s Rebuttal Brattle’s “Rebuttal Report: Financial Damages Report to RREEF”, dated 8 February 2017 BDO Group Report on Tribunal Requests, dated BDO Report on Tribunal Requests 5 March 2018 Working papers accompanying BDO Report BDO Working Papers duplicating Brattle’s Rebuttal Report, dated 8 February 2017 Brattle Group Response to Tribunal Requests, 5 Brattle Memorandum March 2018 C-[#] Claimants’ Exhibit CJEU Court of Justice of the European Union CL-[#] Claimants’ Legal Authority Claimants’ Observations on Additional Claimants’ Observations on Additional Documents Documents, 26 March 2018 Claimants’ Response to the Respondents Claimants’ Response to Spain’s Comments on Comments on the European Commission’s State Aid Decision Decision, 5 February 2018 Claimants’ Memorial on the Merits dated 21 CM November 2014 CNE National Energy Commission Claimants’ Post Hearing Brief dated 5 May CPHB 2017 CPI Consumer Price Index ii Claimants’ Reply on the Merits dated 22 CR December 2016 Claimants’ Response to Respondent’s CRR Submission on Tribunal’s Information Request, dated 26 March 2018 Claimants’ Submission on Tribunal Request, CS dated 5 March 2018 CSP Concentrated Solar Power DCF Discounted Cash Flow The Tribunal’s Decision on Jurisdiction of 6 Decision on Jurisdiction June 2016 ECT Energy Charter Treaty FIT Feed in Tariffs Hearing on the Merits held on 20-24 March Hearing 2017 Convention on the Settlement of Investment ICSID Convention Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States dated 18 March 1965 ICSID Rules of Procedure for the Institution of ICSID Institution Rules Conciliation and Arbitration Proceeding International Centre for Settlement of ICSID or the Centre Investment Disputes Instituto para la Diversificación y Ahorro de la IDEA Energía IRR Internal Rate of Return MITYC Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Commerce MOA Margin of Appreciation PEIF RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Fund L.P. iii PER Renewable Energy Plan PFER Renewable Energy Promotion Plan R-[#] Respondent’s Exhibit Registro Administrativo de Instalaciones de RAIPRE Producción de Energía Eléctrica [en régimen especial] Respondent’s Counter-Memorial on the Merits RCM dated 15 July 2016 Spain’s Renewable Energy power generation RE sector REEF Infra RREEF Infrastructure (G.P.) Respondents Comments on European Respondent’s Comments on State Aid Decision Commission Decision on the State Aid, 30 January 2018 Respondent’s Observations on Additional Respondent’s Observations on Additional Documents Documents, 26 March 2018 RL-[#] Respondent’s Legal Authority RPHB Respondent’s Post Hearing Brief dated [date] Respondent’s Rejoinder on the Merits dated 3 RR February 2017 RREEF Pan-European Infrastructure Two Lux RREEF Pan-European Two S.à r.l. Respondent’s Response to Tribunal Request for RRR Additional Information, 05 March 2018 Respondent’s Reply to Claimants’ Submission RRS to Tribunal’s Request for Additional Information, 26 March 2018 SES / SEE Spanish Electricity Sector Tr. Day [#] [Speaker(s)], [page:line] Transcript of the Hearing iv Treaty Energy Charter Treaty Tribunal Arbitral tribunal constituted on 31 July 2014 Tax on the Value of the Production of Electric TVPEE Energy VCLT Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties WACC Weighted Average Cost of Capital YBILC Yearbook of the International Law Commission v TABLE OF CONTENTS The Spanish Electricity System .................................................................................... 17 (a) Spain’s Energy Policy and the Relevant International Framework ........................ 17 (b) The National Legal and Regulatory Framework .................................................... 24 1. The Initial Measures ...................................................................................... 25 2. The Disputed Measures ................................................................................. 35 The Claimants’ Investment in Spain ............................................................................ 43 (a) Pre-Investment Phase and Due Diligence ............................................................... 43 (b) The Claimants’ Investments in Renewable Energy ................................................ 50 1. The Dédalo Wind Project .............................................................................. 50 2. The Arenales CSP Plant ................................................................................ 51 3. The Andasol CSP Plants ................................................................................ 53 a. The Decision on Jurisdiction ............................................................. 55 b. The Parties’ Positions ........................................................................ 55 The Respondent’s Position .......................................................... 56 The Claimants’ Position .............................................................. 56 c. The Tribunal’s Analysis on the Tax Objection ................................. 57 A. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................... 60 1. Article 42 of the ICSID Convention .............................................................. 60 2. Relevance of EU Law .................................................................................... 62 a. The Parties’ position .......................................................................... 62 The Respondent’s Position .......................................................... 62 The Claimants’ Position .............................................................. 64 b. The Tribunal’s Analysis .................................................................... 66 B. General Framework: The Object And Purpose Of The ECT, The State’s Regulatory Power and The Applicability of a Margin of Appreciation .......................................... 69 a. The Parties’ Positions ........................................................................ 69 vi The Claimants’ Position .............................................................. 69 The Respondent’s Position .......................................................... 72 b. The Tribunal’s Analysis .................................................................... 75 C. Legal Standards of Protection (The FET and the Umbrella Clause).............................. 79 (a) The Legal Standard ................................................................................................. 80 1. Scope of the FET ........................................................................................... 80 a. The Parties’ positions ........................................................................ 80 The Claimants’ Position .............................................................. 80 The Respondent’s Position .......................................................... 81 b. The Tribunal’s Analysis .................................................................... 82 2. The Umbrella Clause ..................................................................................... 84 a. The Parties’ Positions ........................................................................ 84 The Claimants’ Position .............................................................. 86 The Respondent’s Position .......................................................... 87 b. The Tribunal’s Analysis .................................................................... 89 (b) The Alleged Violations of the Claimants’ Rights ................................................... 91 1. Stability and Predictability ............................................................................ 91 a. The Parties’ Positions ........................................................................ 91 The Claimants’ Position .............................................................. 91 The Respondent’s Position .........................................................