West Hoathly Landowner Evidence Summary

SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY LANDOWNERS AND OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES DMMO 2/11 NAME & ADDRESS INTEREST DATES ANYONE ELSE DO THEY ARE THEY HAS THE FREQUENCY HAVE THEY HAVE THEY HAVE THEY HAVE THEY HAVE THERE NOTICES HAVE THEY FURTHER HELD WITH AN CONSIDER IT WILLING TO STATUS OF OF THEIR USE. ENCOUNTERE STOPPED/ ASKED AN GIVEN EVER BEEN DEPOSITED INFORMATION INTEREST TO BE A DEDICATE? THE ROUTE IS THE ROUTE D PEOPLE TURNED BACK EMPLOYEE TO PERMISSION ANY PLANS DETAILS PROW? BEEN THE VISIBLE FROM USING THE THE PUBLIC? DO SO? FOR USE? IF OBSTRUCTION UNDER HA DATES SUBJECT OF PLACE OF ROUTE? SO, TO S E.G. 1980? DISCUSSION? OCCUPATION/ WHOM? GATES/STILES RESIDENCE? ON THE ROUTE? Affinity Sutton Owner of part of The association 12 Elstree Way claimed route have no objection Borehamwood (from Points A to the proposal. Herts to D). WD6 1JE. Mid Sussex District Owner of part of The District Council claimed route Council consider Oaklands (small section at this particular Oaklands Road Point A). section (at Point A) Haywards Heath to be highway and RH16 1SS. have no objections to the proposal. Mr. T. Baker Adjoining 44 years. Presume all No – always Yes – footpath. Told by Council Use everyday to Constant for 44 No. No. No. No stiles, No. No. 10 Garden Mead property owner. neighbours in been a shortcut (WSCC and and from work years on foot, believe there West Hoathly Garden Mead, along lane from West Hoathly or whenever horseback, by was a gate into West Sussex Sandy Lane. steps to Church PC) road is using house. vehicle. Finche Field RH19 3QH. Hill, before path unadopted so Route is visible when path was built through residents had to from residence. first built but Finche Field pay for never shut – about 40 years resurfacing thus think we played ago. can’t be public on it as kids but route or Council not sure. should have contributed. Mrs. M. Davidson Property owner 4 and half years No. Yes – footpath. Yes – footpath. No. Use route for On foot, a few No – this is a No. No. To the best of To the best of No. 2 The Dunnings in Sandy Lane residence. walking up and residents public road not a my knowledge my knowledge Sandy Lane opposite down my road, everyday and privately owned no. no West Hoathly proposed path. to and from my occasional one. West Sussex house. Route is groups of RH19 4QQ. visible from walkers. residence. Mr. and Mrs. Maynard Adjoining 46 years. Council. Yes – footpath. Yes – footpath. No. Don’t use the Every day on No. No. No. Can’t No. No. 8 Garden Mead property owner. route. Route is foot. remember. West Hoathly visible from West Sussex residence. RH19 4QH. Mr. R. Mensinga Adjoining 1 year. No. Yes – footpath. Yes – footpath. No. Use route to Daily on foot. No. No. No. No. No. No. Providence Cottage property owner. walk to shop in North Lane Sharpthorne. West Hoathly Route is visible West Sussex from residence. RH19 4QG. Mr. R. Ward Adjoining 14 years. No. No. Yes – footpath. No. I live on Sandy Twice daily to No. No. No. No. No. No. Sandy Lane and Comwell property owner. Lane and the access local Garden Mead are Sandy Lane path is visible primary school, un-adopted. In West Hoathly from my occasionally for June 2008, the West Sussex residence. other purposes. residents paid for RH19 4QQ. the resurfacing of this road. If it were made a public right of way I would expect the Council to take up the up-keep of Sandy Lane and Garden Mead. .

Load more