5G Mobile Communications for 2020 and Beyond - Vision and Key Enabling Technologies
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
5G Mobile Communications for 2020 and Beyond - Vision and Key Enabling Technologies - EUCNC 2014, Bologna June 2014 Wonil Roh, Ph.D. Vice President & Head of Advanced Communications Lab DMC R&D Center, Samsung Electronics Corp. Table of Contents 2 5G Vision & Key Requirements 3 Mobile Trend 5G Vision Mobile Mobile Mobile Things Connections[1] Data Traffic[1] Cloud Traffic[2] Connected[3] 10.2Bn 15.9EB 70% 50Bn Percent 35% 7Bn 1.5EB Devices 12.5Bn Connections Bytes /Month 2013 2018 2013 2018 2013 2020 2010 2020 Year Year Year Year [1] VNI Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast 2013-2018, Cisco, 2014 [2] The Mobile Economy, GSMA, 2014 [3] Internet of Things, Cisco, 2013 EB (Exa Bytes) = 1,000,000 TB (Tera Bytes) 4 5G Service Vision 5G Vision Everything Immersive Ubiquitous Intuitive on Cloud Experience Connectivity Remote Access Desktop-like experience Lifelike media An intelligent web of Real-time remote control on the go everywhere connected things of machines 5 Everything on Cloud 5G Vision As-Is To-Be Lagging Cloud Service Instantaneous Cloud Service Latency : ~ 50 ms[1] Latency : ~ 5 ms Cloud Cloud Service Service ~ 20 min (Worldwide Avg.) ~ 9.6 sec to download HD movie (1.2GB) to download HD movie (1.2GB) Cloud Service LTE Downlink Requirements for Mobile Cloud Service Initial Access Time* Performance[2] Provider A 82 ms World 7.5 Mbps • E2E NW Latency < 5 ms Desktop Provider B 111 ms Korea 18.6 Mbps HDD[3] Provider C 128 ms America 6.5 Mbps • Data Rate > 1.0 Gbps Access Time 8.5 ms Transfer Rate 1.2 Gbps * Top 3 Cloud Service Provider measured in Suwon Office (2013) [1] Signals Ahead, AT&T Drive Test Results and Report Preview, 2011 Including connect time and response time [2] The State of LTE, OpenSignal, 2014 6 [3] Seagate ST2000DM001 (2TB, 7200rpm Immersive Experience 5G Vision As-Is To-Be Limited High Quality Experience Constant Ultra High Quality Experience AR / VR Hologram 8K UHD 720p HD > 100 users 12 users Requirements for Immersive Service User Experience LTE Cell Capacity Loading Delay 1.6 sec* Cell Throughput 64 Mbps[1] • E2E NW Latency < 5 ms • Cell Throughput > 10.0 Gbps * Assuming 720p HD, 1 sec buffering, E2E latency 50ms and TCP connection [1] 3GPP Submission Package for IMT-Advanced, 3GPP Contribution RP-090939 AR : Augmented Reality Required Bandwidth 720p HD[2] : 5 Mbps 8K UHD[3] : 85 Mbps [2] https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/1722171?hl=en VR : Virtual Reality 7 [3] http://www.nhk.or.jp/strl/publica/rd/rd140/PDF/P12-21.pdf Ubiquitous Connectivity 5G Vision As-Is To-Be Human Centric, Limited Connections An intelligent web of connected things (IoT) ` Home Personal ~ Retail City, Transportation Manufacturing 8 Intuitive Remote Access 5G Vision As-Is To-Be Short Range, Limited Control Long Range, Real-time Full Control Remote Surgery Control Center Hazardous Work Remote Driving 9 Overview Key Requirements Comprehensive Requirements of “New IMT (5G)” in 7 Categories, Dubbed as Mobility High Enhanced Future IMT-Adv. IMT IMT-Adv. IMT-2000 New radio local area Low network (RLAN) 1 10 100 1000 10000 50000 Peak Data Rate (Mbit/s) ITU-R WP5D/TEMP/390-E 10 Key Requirements Ultra Fast Data Transmission Peak Data Rate Order of Magnitude Improvement in Peak Data Rate Peak Data Rate > 50 Gbps Data Rate 50 Gbps[1] 50 Gbps More than x50 over 4G 6 Gbps[2] 1 Gbps 1 Gbps[1] 75 Mbps[2] 14 Mbps[1] 384 kbps[2] ‘20 ‘00 ‘07 ‘10 Year [1] Theoretical Peak Data Rate [2] Data Rate of First Commercial Products 11 Key Requirements Superior User Experience Cell Edge Latency Data Rate Uniform Experience of Gbps Speed and Instantaneous Response 1 Gbps Anywhere E2E Latency < 5 msec 50 ms QoE BS Location 5 ms A Tenth of E2E Latency Cell Edge E2E Latency Air Latency < 1 msec BS Location QoE 10 ms Uniform Experience Regardless of User-location 1 ms A Tenth of Air Latency Air Latency 12 Massive Connectivity Key Requirements 10 Times More Simultaneous IoT Connections than 4G Simultaneous Connection Smart Home Smart Manufacturing ` Future Devices 80 Billion of Current Smart Health Smart Retail Number 15 Billion 4 Billion Smart ~ Transportation 2010 2012 2020 Year Smart City Source : Internet of Things by IDATE, 2013 13 Cost Effectiveness Key Requirements 50 Times More Cost Effective than 4G Cost Efficiency Traffic Volume Etc. Etc. (12%) ( ∝Operator Cost ) (24%) Backhaul Site Building, Lease(9%) Maintenance 50 Times Higher Rigging (36%) Network (41%) Bits/Cost Electricity Testing (15%) (12%) RAN Personnel Equipment Expenses Operator Revenue (23%) (28%) Time CAPEX[1] OPEX[2] [1] Radio Network Sharing – new paradigm for LTE, http://www.telecom-cloud.net/radio-network-sharing-the-new-paradigm [2] Quest for margins: operational cost strategies for mobile operators in Europe, Capgemini Telecom & Media Insights, Issue 42 14 Enabling Technologies : RAN 15 Enabling Technologies : RAN Capacity System Capacity : Determined by Bandwidth, Spectral Efficiency and Areal Reuse Link Capacity System Capacity Point-to-Point Link with Single Antenna Spectral Efficiency Areal Reuse 푪 = 푾풍풐품ퟐ ퟏ + 푺푵푹 Bandwidth 16 Enabling Technologies : RAN Capacity - Bandwidth Most Straightforward Method for Capacity Increase Bandwidth Increase System Capacity Carrier Aggregation, Higher Frequencies Spectral Efficiency Areal Reuse 푪 = 푾풍풐품ퟐ ퟏ + 푺푰푵푹 Bandwidth 17 Enabling Technologies : RAN Capacity - Areal Reuse Use of Various Small Cells for Increase of Areal Reuse Areal Reuse Increase System Capacity Sectorization, HetNet, Small Cells Spectral Efficiency Areal Reuse 푪 = 푾 풍풐품ퟐ ퟏ + 푺푰푵푹 Bandwidth 18 Enabling Technologies : RAN Capacity - Spectral Efficiency (1/2) Use of MIMO and Advanced Coding & Modulation for Higher Efficiency Higher Spectral Efficiency System Capacity MIMO, Adv. Coding and Modulation Spectral Efficiency Areal Reuse 푹풂풏풌 푺푵푹풂풗품 푪 = 푾 ퟏ + 흀풓 Bandwidth 푵푻푿 풓 19 Enabling Technologies : RAN Capacity - Spectral Efficiency (2/2) New Waveform Design for Exploiting Non-Gaussianity of Channel Higher Spectral Efficiency System Capacity FQAM (Hybrid Modulation of FSK and QAM) Spectral Efficiency Non-Gaussian Areal Reuse 푪 > 푪[1] 푵풐풏−푮풂풖풔풔풊풂풏 Bandwidth 퐰퐡퐞퐫퐞 푪 = 푾풍풐품ퟐ ퟏ + 푺푵푹 [1] I. Shomorony, et al., “Worst-Case Additive Noise in Wireless Networks,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 59, no. 6, June 2013. 20 Enabling Technologies : RAN Enabling Technologies - RAN (1/2) Disruptive RAN Technologies for Significant Performance Enhancements Technology for Coding/Modulation Advanced Peak Data Rate Above 6 GHz & Multiple Access MIMO & BF Cell Edge Peak Data Rate Spectral Efficiency & Cell Capacity Data Rate Cell Spectral Increase Cell Edge Enhancement Enhancement Efficiency Mobility Filter-Bank Multi-Carrier Peak Rate Peak Rate Half Cost Efficiency 1 Gbps 50 Gbps -wavelength FSK QAM Simultaneous Frequency band Connection 4G New higher FQAM Latency frequencies frequencies BF : Beamforming 21 Enabling Technologies : RAN Enabling Technologies - RAN (2/2) Disruptive RAN Technologies for Significant Performance Enhancements Enhanced Advanced Interference Peak Data Rate D2D Small Cell Management Cell Edge Areal Spectral Efficiency Capacity & Cell Edge Cell Edge Data Rate Data Rate Cell Spectral Increase Enhancement Enhancement Efficiency Mobility Wireless backhaul Increased density Cost Efficiency Simultaneous Connection Latency Enhancing areal spectral efficiency Interference alignment No cell boundary D2D : Device-to-Device 22 Recent R&D Results Above 6 GHz 23 Recent R&D Results Above 6 GHz Wider Bandwidth for 5G Availability of More than 500 MHz Contiguous Spectrum Above 6 GHz Below 6 GHz Above 6 GHz (Regional Recommendations from ITU) 300 MHz 6 GHz MS, MS, MS, FS, FSS FS, FSS FS, FSS GHz < 1 GHz 410-430, 470-694/698, [MHz] 694/698-790[1] 25.25 27.5 40.5 42.5 Region 1 1-2 GHz 1300-1400, 1427-1525/1527, [MHz] 1695-1700/1710 27.5 29.5 31.3 33.8 36 40 41 42.5 Region 2 2-3 GHz 2025-2100, 2200-2290, 18.4 [MHz] 2700-3100 3-5 GHz 3300-3400, 3400-4200, 18.1 18.6 27 29.5 38 39.5 Region 3 [MHz] 4400-5000 Current Usage Current Usage 5-6 GHz US : LMDS, FSS US : Fixed P-P System 5150-5925, 5850-6245 MOBILE Primary [MHz] EU : Fixed P-P Link EU : Fixed P-P Link FSS Earth Station Korea : Broadcasting Relay No MOBILE Global Interest Bands for WRC-15 Korea : Maritime Use [1] WRC-15 AI 1.2 MS : Mobile Service FSS : Fixed Satellite Service LMDS : Local Multipoint Distribution Service 24 FS : Fixed Service P-P : Point to Point Recent R&D Results Above 6 GHz Test Results - Prototype System Overview World’s First 5G mmWave Mobile Technology (May, 2013)[1] Adaptive array transceiver technology operating in mmWave frequency bands for outdoor cellular 42 mm 25 mm 45 mm 5 mm 25 Recent R&D Results Above 6 GHz Test Results - Outdoor Coverage Outdoor Non Line-of-Sight (NLoS) Coverage Tests Block error rate less than 0.01% up to NLoS 200m distance Wonil Roh, et al., “Millimeter-Wave Beamforming as an Enabling Technology for 5G Cellular Communications: Theoretical Feasibility and Prototype Results,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Feb. 2014. BLER result Below 0.01% Below 0.1% Below 1% Below 10 % Below 25% Below 50% Below 75% Below 100% LoS / NLoS LoS NLoS 26 Recent R&D Results Above 6 GHz Test Results - Outdoor to Indoor Penetration Outdoor-to-Indoor Penetration Tests Most signals successfully received by indoor MS from outdoor BS Wonil Roh, et al., “Millimeter-Wave Beamforming as an Enabling Technology for 5G Cellular Communications: Theoretical Feasibility and Prototype Results,” IEEE Communications Magazine, Feb. 2014. 27 Recent R&D Results Above 6 GHz Test Results - Multi-User Support Carrier Frequency