GRDA), an Agency of the State of Oklahoma
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Federal Register/Vol. 82, No. 8/Thursday, January 12, 2017/Notices
3766 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 8 / Thursday, January 12, 2017 / Notices of the protest or intervention to the Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: Protests may be considered, but Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Revisions to OATT Schedule 12— intervention is necessary to become a 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC Appendix A re: RTEP Projects party to the proceeding. 20426. Approved in Dec 2016 to be effective 4/ eFiling is encouraged. More detailed This filing is accessible on-line at 6/2017. information relating to filing http://www.ferc.gov, using the Filed Date: 1/6/17. requirements, interventions, protests, ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for Accession Number: 20170106–5061. service, and qualifying facilities filings review in the Commission’s Public Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/27/17. can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/ Reference Room in Washington, DC. Docket Numbers: ER17–754–000. docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Applicants: Southern California other information, call (866) 208–3676 Web site that enables subscribers to Edison Company. (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. receive email notification when a Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing: GIA Dated: January 6, 2017. document is added to a subscribed and Distribution Service Agmt Kimberly D. Bose, docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Lendlease California City Solar LLC to Secretary. Online service, please email be effective 1/7/2017. [FR Doc. 2017–00564 Filed 1–11–17; 8:45 am] [email protected], or call Filed Date: 1/6/17. BILLING CODE 6717–01–P (866) 208–3676 (toll free). -
Campgrounds, Sand Hills, Playground, Sand Volleyball Court, Nature Trail, Hiking Trails, Horseshoe Pits, Picnic Shelters, Fishing
MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide Oklahoma United States Highway #64 "Oklahoma-New Mexico State Line to Oklahoma-Arkansas State Line" Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Oklahoma-New Mexico From Clayton, NM, US Highway 64 crosses the state line and enters the State Line community of Felt, OK. Runs concurrently with US Highways 412 & 56. Altitude: 4744 feet 12.0 Felt, OK Community of Felt, OK. Limited services. Altitude: 4455 feet 28.4 US Highway 385 South to the Oklahoma-Texas state line. NOTE: Overlap to the north with US Highway 64. Altitude: 4209 feet 31.8 US Highway NOTE: US Highway 385 ends its overlap with US Highway 64, joins 385/Oklahoma State OK State Highway 3 and goes north to the Oklahoma-Colorado state Highways 3/325 line. OK State Highway 325 heads west-north to the community of Kenton, OK. - Black Mesa Oklahoma State Park (County Rd 325, Tel. 580-426-2222): picnic area, nature preserve, campsites, playground, hiking trails, wildlife viewing, showers, restrooms; open dawn to dusk; and the Oklahoma-New Mexico state line. NOTE: OK State Highway 3 overlaps US Highway 64. Altitude: 4167 feet 32.2 Boise City, OK Community of Boise City, OK. Limited services. Altitude: 4154 feet 33.4 US Highway 287 North-west-north to Boise City Airport (a public use airport north of Boise, OK) and the Oklahoma-Colorado state line. South to the Oklahoma-Texas state line. Altitude: 4140 feet 39.3 US Highway 56 NOTE: US Highway 56 separates from US Highway 64. Northeast to the communities of Keyes, OK (limited services) and Sturgis, OK (limited services). -
Restoration and Maintenance of the Access to the Neosho River at Jacobs Creek-John Redmond Reservoir)
FEASIBILITY STUDY (RESTORATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE ACCESS TO THE NEOSHO RIVER AT JACOBS CREEK-JOHN REDMOND RESERVOIR) 2008 Prepared for Kansas Water Office 901 South Kansas Topeka, KS 66612 Prepared by Watershed Institute, Inc. 1200 SW Executive Dr. Topeka, KS 66615 www.watershedinstitute.biz Cover Page Photo: Neosho River Logjam from Jacobs Landing FEASIBILITY STUDY — NEOSHO RIVER LOGJAM ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION...........................................................................................................2 PROJECT SETTING ...............................................................................................................................2 Neosho River Logjam..........................................................................................................................4 NEOSHO RIVER RESEARCH...............................................................................................................4 Natural and Regulated Flows/Historical Droughts ............................................................................4 High-Flow Frequency/Channel Geometry..........................................................................................5 Geomorphic Effects/Overflow Dams...................................................................................................5 Channel Stability Downstream from John Redmond Dam -
CHECK out OTHER FISHING INFORMATION at OUR WEBSITE: Kansas Fishing: We’Ve Come a Long Way, Baby!
Details Back Cover CHECK OUT OTHER FISHING INFORMATION AT OUR WEBSITE: www.kdwp.state.ks.us Kansas fishing: We’ve come a long way, baby! hat's right. Kansas fishing isn't what it used to be. It's much more. Oh, we still have some of the best channel, Tflathead, and blue catfishing to be found, but today Kansas anglers have great variety. If you're an old-school angler and still want to catch the whiskered fish native to our streams and rivers, you have more opportunities today than ever. Channel catfish are found in nearly every stream, river, pond, lake, and reservoir in the state. They remain one of the most popular angling species. To keep up with demand, state fish hatcheries produce mil- lions of channel cats each year. Some are stocked into lakes as fry, but more are fed and grown to catchable size, then stocked into one of many state and community lakes around the state. Our reservoirs hold amazing numbers of channel catfish, and for the most part, the reservoir cats are overlooked by anglers fishing for other species. Fisheries biologists consider channel cats an underutilized resource in most large reservoirs. For sheer excitement, the flathead catfish is still king. Monster flatheads weighing 60, 70 and even 80 pounds are caught each owned, but some reaches are leased by the department through summer. Most of the truly large flatheads come from the larger the Fishing Impoundments and Stream Habitats (F.I.S.H) rivers in the eastern half of the state, where setting limb and trot Program, while other reaches are in public ownership. -
Final Impact Statement for the Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan for the Endangered American Burying Beetle
Final Environmental Impact Statement For the Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan for the Endangered American Burying Beetle for American Electric Power in Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas Volume II: Appendices September 2018 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southwest Region Albuquerque, NM Costs to Develop and Produce this EIS: Lead Agency $29,254 Applicant (Contractor) $341,531 Total Costs $370,785 Appendix A Acronyms and Glossary Appendix A Acronyms and Glossary ACRONYMS °F Fahrenheit ABB American burying beetle AEP American Electric Power Company AMM avoidance and minimization measures APE Area of Potential Effects APLIC Avian Power Line Interaction Committee APP Avian Protection Plan Applicant American Electric Power Company ATV all-terrain vehicles BGEPA Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act BMP best management practices CE Common Era CFR Code of Federal Regulations Corps Army Corps of Engineers CPA Conservation Priority Areas CWA Clean Water Act DNL day-night average sound level EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMF electric magnetic fields EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FR Federal Register GHG greenhouse gases HCP American Electric Power Habitat Conservation Plan for American Burying Beetle in Oklahoma, Arkansas, and Texas ITP Incidental Take Permit MDL multi-district litigation NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHD National Hydrography Dataset NOI Notice of Intent NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service NWI National Wetlands Inventory NWR National Wildlife Refuge OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration ROD Record of Decision ROW right-of-way American Electric Power Habitat Conservation Plan September 2018 A-1 Environmental Impact Statement U.S. -
RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map -
The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods
The 1951 Kansas - Missouri Floods ... Have We Forgotten? Introduction - This report was originally written as NWS Technical Attachment 81-11 in 1981, the thirtieth anniversary of this devastating flood. The co-authors of the original report were Robert Cox, Ernest Kary, Lee Larson, Billy Olsen, and Craig Warren, all hydrologists at the Missouri Basin River Forecast Center at that time. Although most of the original report remains accurate today, Robert Cox has updated portions of the report in light of occurrences over the past twenty years. Comparisons of the 1951 flood to the events of 1993 as well as many other parenthetic remarks are examples of these revisions. The Storms of 1951 - Fifty years ago, the stage was being set for one of the greatest natural disasters ever to hit the Midwest. May, June and July of 1951 saw record rainfalls over most of Kansas and Missouri, resulting in record flooding on the Kansas, Osage, Neosho, Verdigris and Missouri Rivers. Twenty-eight lives were lost and damage totaled nearly 1 billion dollars. (Please note that monetary damages mentioned in this report are in 1951 dollars, unless otherwise stated. 1951 dollars can be equated to 2001 dollars using a factor of 6.83. The total damage would be $6.4 billion today.) More than 150 communities were devastated by the floods including two state capitals, Topeka and Jefferson City, as well as both Kansas Cities. Most of Kansas and Missouri as well as large portions of Nebraska and Oklahoma had monthly precipitation totaling 200 percent of normal in May, 300 percent in June, and 400 percent in July of 1951. -
The University Op Oklahoma Graduate College An
THE UNIVERSITY OP OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE AN ANALYSIS OP THE PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OP ELECTRIC POWER BY THE GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OP PHILOSOPHY BY C. ORVILLE ELLIOTT Norman, Oklahoma 1958 AN ANALYSIS OF THE PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION OP ELECTRIC POWER BY THE GRAND RIVER DAM AUTHORITY APPROVED BY DISSERTATION COMMITTEE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank Dr. Jim E. Reese, professor of economics at the University of Oklahoma, for suggesting this topic for research. As director of the dissertation. Dr. Reese gave unselfishly of his counsel in the field of public policy and of his time. His advice and encouragement were invaluable. Dr. Paul A. Brinker, professor of economics; Dr. Virgle G. Wilhite, professor of economics; Mr. Dewey L. Bames, professor of accounting; and Mr. James M. Murphy, assistant professor of finance, all of the University of Oklahoma, deserve grateful acknowledgment for their suggestions as the research progressed and their careful study of the completed work. Mr. W. B. Hoss, General Manager; Mr. Q. B. Boydston, General Counsel; Mr. James I. Monroe, General Auditor; and the entire staff of the Grand River Dam Authority at Vinita, Oklahoma, were very cooperative and helpful in providing full access to the records of the Grand River Dam Authority and in making many suggestions as the research was conducted. Without their cooperation it would have been impossible for iii this study to have "been completed. Mr. Francis J. Borelli and his staff in the Division of Water Resources, of the Oklahoma Planning and Resources Board, were also very cooperative in permitting access to their records, files and publications. -
Species Biological Report Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis Rafinesqueana)
Species Biological Report Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) Cover photo: Dr. Chris Barnhart (Missouri State University) Prepared by: The Neosho Mucket Recovery Team This species biological report informs the Draft Recovery Plan for the Neosho Mucket (Lampsilis rafinesqueana) (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2017). The Species Biological Report is a comprehensive biological status review by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) for the Neosho Mucket and provides an account of species overall viability. A Recovery Implementation Strategy, which provides the expanded narrative for the recovery activities and the implementation schedule, is available at https://www.fws.gov/arkansas-es/. The Recovery Implementation Strategy and Species Biological Report are finalized separately from the Recovery Plan and will be updated on a routine basis. Executive Summary The Neosho Mucket is a freshwater mussel endemic to the Illinois, Neosho, and Verdigris River basins in Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. It is associated with shallow riffles and runs comprising gravel substrate and moderate to swift currents, but prefers near-shore areas or areas out of the main current in Shoal Creek and Illinois River. It does not occur in reservoirs lacking riverine characteristics. The life-history traits and habitat requirements of the Neosho Mucket make it extremely susceptible to environmental change (e.g., droughts, sedimentation, chemical contaminants). Mechanisms leading to the decline of Neosho Mucket range from local (e.g., riparian clearing, chemical contaminants, etc.), to regional influences (e.g., altered flow regimes, channelization, etc.), to global climate change. The synergistic (interaction of two or more components) effects of threats are often complex in aquatic environments, making it difficult to predict changes in mussel and fish host(s) distribution, abundance, and habitat availability that may result from these effects. -
Influence of Water Flow on Neosho Madtom
Am. Midl. Nat. 156:305–318 Influence of Water Flow on Neosho madtom (Noturus placidus) Reproductive Behavior JANICE L. BRYAN1 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, The School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211 MARK L. WILDHABER U.S. Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, Missouri 65201 AND DOUGLAS B. NOLTIE Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences, The School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211 ABSTRACT.—The Neosho madtom is a small, short-lived catfish species endemic to gravel bars of the Neosho River in Kansas, Oklahoma and Missouri, U.S.A. It spawns during summer in nesting cavities excavated in gravel. Although the species has survived dam construction within the Neosho River basin, its declining numbers resulted in it being added to the federal threatened species list in 1991. To test how water flow affects the reproductive behavior of Neosho madtoms, we compared activities of male-female pairs in static versus flowing-water aquaria. Using a behavioral catalog, we recorded their behavior sequences during randomly selected 5-min nighttime periods. For males and females, Jostle and Embrace were the most performed reproductive behaviors and the Jostle-Embrace-Carousel was the most performed reproductive behavior sequence. Water flow decreased the mean frequency of occurrence, percentage of time spent and mean event duration of male Nest Building. Because Neosho madtom courtship, reproduction and parental care is a complex and extended process, disturbances such as heightened river flows during the species’ spawning season may negatively affect nest quality and reproductive success. INTRODUCTION Many environmental cues trigger spawning in temperate fish species, including food abundance, photoperiod, temperature, flooding, lunar cycles and social interaction (Bye, 1984; Munro et al., 1990). -
Neosho River (Chanute) Water Quality Impairment: Copper
NEOSHO BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Water Body/Assessment Unit: Neosho River (Chanute) Water Quality Impairment: Copper 1. INTRODUCTION AND PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION Subbasin: Upper Neosho Counties: Coffey, Anderson, Woodson, Allen, and Neosho HUC 8: 11070204 HUC 11 (HUC 14s): 050 (010, 020, 050) Drainage Area: 448 square miles (Station 560 only) Main Stem Segments: 3, 5, 6, 8, 10 starting near confluence with Crooked Creek in southeastern Coffey County and traveling downstream through Woodson and Allen Counties to northwest Neosho County at monitoring station #560 and confluence with Sutton Creek (Figure 1). Tributary Segments: Sutton Creek (35), Slack Creek (30), Charles Branch Creek (27), Onion Creek (24), Elm Creek (1050), Rock Creek (7), Spring Creek (46), Indian Creek (924), Little Indian Creek (939), Martin Creek (49), Crooked Creek (44) Designated Uses: Special Aquatic Life Support, Primary Contact Recreation; Domestic Water Supply; Food Procurement; Ground Water Recharge; Industrial Water Supply Use; Irrigation Use; Livestock Watering Use for Main Stem Segments in HUC 11070204. Impaired Use: Expected Aquatic Life Support Water Quality Standard: Acute Criterion = WER[EXP[(0.9422*(LN(hardness)))-1.700]] Hardness-dependent criteria (KAR 28-16-28e(c)(2)(F)(ii)). Aquatic Life (AL) Support formulae are: (where Water Effects Ratio (WER) is 1.0 and hardness is in mg/L). 2. CURRENT WATER QUALITY CONDITION AND DESIRED ENDPOINT Level of Support for Designated Use under 2002 303(d): Not Supporting Aquatic Life Monitoring Site: Station 560 near Chanute Period of Record Used for Monitoring and Modeling: 1985 - 2001 for Station 560. Generalized Watershed Loading Function (GWLF) modeling period for soil data is 1998 – 2002. -
Mparative [Nfluences of Environmental
~~MPARATIVE [NFLUENCES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS ON ABUNDANCES OF HYBRID STRIPED BASS AND WHITE BASS IN THE .@RAND _!t-AKE !Ail,WATER, OKLAHOMA - !'>.'<~ ~ .. By TODD GREGORY ADORNATO !i Bachelor of Science Denison University Granville, Ohio 1986 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requi1~ements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 1990 .. :·..... J.. t~ ;' •.... ·(· }' d ru~D-LDJ \C:1c10 A:.t-n c._ top.~ Oklahoma State Univ. LibrlU'Y COMPARATIVE INFLUENCES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS ON ABUNDANCES OF HYBRID STRIPED BASS AND WHITE BASS IN THE GRAND LAKE TAil~WATER, OKLAHOMl~ Thesis Approved: 1380759 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to expre~s sincere appreciation to Dr. Al Zale for his encouragement and advice throughout my graduate ~ candidacy. I al~o thank Dr. Tracy Carter and Dr. Larry Talent for serving on my graduate committee. To Dr. Bill Fisher and Matt Lechne~, who provided valuable assistance in the study, I extend my gratitude. For statistical advice, I am grateful to Dr. J. Leroy Folks. This project coul~ not. have been done without the help of the staff and technicians. of the Oklahoma Cooperative. Fish and Wildlife Research Unit; the time and equipment allocated is much appeciated. , Many thanks go to Jan Mord, Kent Sorenson, an~ Vince Tra~riichek for their help in the '' field and in the office. The project was much more enjoyable and efficient because of.them. I would also like to acknowledge the financial ·supp.ort and cooperation of the Grand River Dam Authority. ,, Finally, I would like .to thank my family.