DOCSLIB.ORG

Whole Day Download the Hansard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Whole Day Download the Hansard Wednesday Volume 597 24 June 2015 No. 22 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 24 June 2015 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2015 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 867 24 JUNE 2015 868 why we need to press ahead with the welfare provisions House of Commons and the sustainable budget. It would be a huge setback for Northern Ireland to lose the rest of the Stormont Wednesday 24 June 2015 House agreement, including the valuable funding for shared and integrated education. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Andrew Stephenson: Does my right hon. Friend agree PRAYERS that the implementation of the Stormont House agreement is the only way to get things back on track in Northern Ireland, and that the Government should continue to [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] do all they can to achieve that? Mrs Villiers: I do agree. We are working hard and the Oral Answers to Questions Executive are making a degree of progress with a number of their obligations under the agreement, but it is vital that welfare reform, which was agreed in Stormont NORTHERN IRELAND Castle and Stormont House, is implemented. It is a good deal for Northern Ireland. The reformed system The Secretary of State was asked— provides real help for vulnerable people and rewards work. It is a better system than the one it replaces. Stormont House Agreement Under Stormont Castle, the five political parties agreed top-ups from the block grant that would give Northern 1. Andrew Gwynne (Denton and Reddish) (Lab): Ireland the most generous welfare system in the United What recent progress has been made on Kingdom. implementation of the Stormont House Agreement; and if she will make a statement. [900425] Suella Fernandes: As has been mentioned, the Stormont House agreement contained a financial package of up 4. Andrew Stephenson (Pendle) (Con): What progress to £2 billion of additional spending power for the has been made on implementation of the Stormont Northern Ireland Executive. Does my right hon. Friend House Agreement. [900428] agree that that represented a substantial commitment by the Government to Northern Ireland which, should 11. Suella Fernandes (Fareham) (Con): What the agreement not be implemented, could be in jeopardy? progress has been made on implementation of the Stormont House Agreement. [900435] Mrs Villiers: It would indeed be in jeopardy, which is The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Mrs Theresa one of the main reasons why it is very important for the Villiers): With permission, Mr Speaker, I will first offer Northern Ireland Executive to pass a budget that works. my condolences, and those of my colleagues in the That will be impossible without the implementation of Government, in relation to the tragedy that occurred in the welfare provisions. It is incumbent on every Berkeley which took the lives of five Irish students. The Administration worldwide to live within their means. pain of that loss is felt across the UK and Ireland. The consequences of denying the deficit and spending The Government are making progress on their obligations money without regard to the consequences are extremely under the Stormont House agreement. We have legislated negative for front-line public services, which is why for corporation tax devolution and we expect to introduce getting the Stormont House agreement back on track is a Bill soon on new structures on the past. I urge the essential if we are to continue to ensure public service Northern Ireland political parties to deliver on their provision is of high quality in Northern Ireland and side of the agreement, including welfare reform and vulnerable groups are protected. passing a sustainable budget. Mr Nigel Dodds (Belfast North) (DUP): Everyone in Andrew Gwynne: I would like to associate myself with Northern Ireland and further afield agrees that the the Secretary of State’s comments. reason the Stormont House agreement is not being Many young people in Northern Ireland have been implemented is the failure of Sinn Féin and the Social given the opportunity to build a shared and integrated Democratic and Labour party to live up to what they future through educational programmes for which there agreed back in December, and to implement what they are substantial resources under the Stormont House agreed and signed up to. Will the Secretary of State agreement. Now that a waiting game is being played as accept that this is now costing Northern Ireland £2 million the parties in Stormont must agree on other matters, a week in terms of loss to the block grant? That is will the Secretary of State update the House on the hitting vulnerable people, and imposing austerity and status of those initiatives? greater cuts, which those parties claim to be against. Does she accept that she must live up to her responsibilities Mrs Villiers: An important part of the financial and take action to ensure the agreement is implemented? package offered by the UK Government under the Stormont House agreement includes £500 million to Mrs Villiers: I agree that every day welfare reform is support shared and integrated education as a crucial delayed and every day Sinn Féin and SDLP refuse to means of building reconciliation in Northern Ireland. live up to their obligations under the Stormont House The financial package is of course contingent on the agreement costs the Northern Ireland Executive money. Stormont House agreement being implemented. The If the situation is not resolved soon, we will start to see UK Government think this is one of the main reasons a significant negative impact on Northern Ireland’s 869 Oral Answers24 JUNE 2015 Oral Answers 870 front-line services, because it will not have a sustainable with regard to the Stormont House agreement? Are or workable budget without Sinn Féin and SDLP living they active participants for peace and progress, or are up to the commitments they undertook as part of the they neutral observers? Stormont House agreement. I will continue to work to see that welfare reform is agreed and implemented, and Mrs Villiers: We are active participants for peace and the Government will consider all the options. progress. That is why we are fully engaged on our side of the Stormont House agreement and in encouraging the parties to live up to theirs. Obviously, a crucial part of Mr Dodds: Given that we are now into the period the agreement is progress on dealing with the legacy of running up to 12 July and beyond, does the Secretary of the past. That is another reason why I appeal to the State accept that enormous efforts were made last year hon. Gentleman and his party colleagues to unblock by community leaders and political parties to ensure the questions about welfare so that we can press ahead peace and calm on the streets of Belfast and elsewhere? with those institutions that his party championed during Since then, she has abandoned the only initiative that the Stormont House talks. was in the offing to move things forward, and has not come up with an alternative. Will she undertake to look Mr Ivan Lewis (Bury South) (Lab): Can the Secretary at the parades legislation? She has the responsibility for of State confirm that in the event of the Stormont parading issues—it is not devolved—so will she come House and Stormont Castle agreements being implemented, forward with proposals to move the situation forward the Northern Ireland Executive will operate a far more and find a replacement for the current failed regime? compassionate and generous benefit system than is available in the rest of the United Kingdom? Mrs Villiers: The best way to take forward reform of parades adjudication is, of course, through the Stormont Mrs Villiers: I believe that the welfare reforms introduced House agreement. I understand that the Office of the by this Government are the best ones for the whole of Legislative Counsel has been preparing the options for the United Kingdom. I believe it is crucial to replace a which it was tasked, under the agreement, for reform of system that has failed and trapped people in poverty parades legislation. I hope that they will be published with one that rewards work and caps benefits. I believe soon. Alongside others, I will take part in the debate that the top-ups agreed by the Northern Ireland parties about what a reformed system of parading would look at the Stormont Castle agreement produce a useful and like and how it would work. In the meantime, it is helpful addition to match specific local circumstances. crucial for us all to work together to encourage a peaceful parading season, where determinations are Mr Lewis: Although we disagree with the Government obeyed and any protests and parades are both peaceful on the bedroom tax and on their refusal to come clean and lawful. on future benefit cuts, the Secretary of State is right to insist that these agreements are honoured without extra money from the Treasury. In the past, Northern Ireland’s Mr Laurence Robertson (Tewkesbury) (Con): With leaders have earned great respect for making tough regard to setting the budget and many other decisions choices for peace. Does she agree that all parties must that need to be taken, is not the fundamental problem now accept that an affordable and sustainable welfare that the Assembly and the Executive were designed for system is vital to securing financial and political stability the very good reason of bringing people together, but in Northern Ireland? that that does not make for an efficient decision-making body? What thought has the Secretary of State given to Mrs Villiers: I thank the hon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Power of the Black Vote in 2015
    POWER OF THE BLACK VOTE IN 2015 The Changing Face of England & Wales Parliamentary seats and their voters Sponsored by Table of Contents 3 Foreword - Simon Woolley 4-5 Executive Summary 6-7 List of Marginal Seats Measured by BME Impact 8 Voting and turnout 9 Methodology 10 BME Population 11 Individual BME Communities 12 Labour’s Challenge 13 Conservative’s Opportunity 14 Lib Dem’s Watershed 15 MP’s Vulnerable to BME Vote 16-63 Analysis of Parliamentary Seats © Operation Black Vote - August 2013 Researched, written and designed by Lester Holloway 2Assistance from Louise Alexander Changing Face of Britain Foreword lack and minority ethnic unemployment, education, Bvoters have been handed health and housing. the greatest opportunity ever What is also interesting about to effectively engage in British this data is the shift of where politics. BME political power has been. In Our groundbreaking research the past it was almost exclusively clearly shows that the BME vote in urban, inner city areas which could easily decide over 160 seats. barely changed political hands. The Coalition Government has Today this change is not only oc- governed the UK with a working curring in urban areas such as majority of just 83 seats. The data Croydon, Harrow and Ealing but that we are publishing therefore also outside urban areas, such speaks volumes; In a 168 marginal as Corby, Rossendale & Darwin, seats the BME electorate is larger Cheadle and Loughborough. than the majority in which the With this report we relish the seat was won. The BME electorate challenge to inspire an often cyni- could influence an even greater cal electorate to engage as never number of seats if, as predicted, before, and simultaneously to the election contest becomes ever inform our political leaders that tighter.
    [Show full text]
  • Health April 2015
    Prospective Parliamentary Candidates Health April 2015 29 April 2015 • 1 General Election 2015: Health Introduction The 2010 General Election saw an unprecedented turnover of MPs, with 227 new Members of Parliament (MPs) elected to the House of Commons. While it is not expected this election will produce anywhere near the same number of new MPs, the prospect of over one hundred new parliamentarians means the House of Commons in 2015 will be markedly different from its current make- up. Health policy has dominated this Parliament. The Health and Social Care Act, which was passed in 2012, has proven to be one of the most controversial healthcare reforms in a generation. The Labour party has chosen to campaign on the NHS at the forefront of their bid for 10 Downing Street on 7th May, which has led to some of the most heated exchanges so far, with accusations and counter accusations of “privatising” or “weaponising” the NHS. Over the past few months, Political Intelligence has undertaken detailed research into parliamentary candidates in order to build an authoritative briefing on the likely future make-up of the Commons. This briefing details candidates with a demonstrable interest in, and experience of, the health sector and health policy. They range from those in safe-seats, to those who have an outside chance. But their experience before Parliament, if elected, may well help shape the health debate over the course of the next five years. 29 April 2015 • 2 The Class of 2015 The candidates listed below are those in either marginal or already safe seats, and therefore have a high likelihood of being elected on the 7th May; Mike O’Brien Party: Labour Constituency: North Warwickshire Incumbent MP: Dan Byles (Conservative) Majority: 54 Background: O’Brien unexpectedly lost the North Warwickshire seat at the last election when he lost to Dan Byles, the Conservative candidate, by a wafer thin margin of 54 votes.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’S Future Consultation Summary Report
    dialoguebydesign making consultation work High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future Consultation Summary Report November 2011 A report to HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport Prepared by Dialogue by Design dialoguebydesign making consultation work High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future Consultation Summary Report November 2011 A report to HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport Prepared by Dialogue by Design Email: [email protected] Website: www.dialoguebydesign.net The information or guidance in this document (including third party information, products and services), is provided by the Department for Transport on an 'as is' basis, without any representation or endorsement made and without warranty of any kind whether express or implied. The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.dft.gov.uk General email enquiries [email protected] Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2011, except where otherwise stated Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Tuesday Volume 512 22 June 2010 No. 19 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Tuesday 22 June 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 143 22 JUNE 2010 144 size of the House of Commons lower than it currently House of Commons is, and to have greater equality between the sizes of constituencies. I do not think that anybody will quibble Tuesday 22 June 2010 with the principle that people’s votes should count equally, wherever they so happen to live. The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Mr Speaker: Order. From now on we must have PRAYERS timely progress, with short questions and short answers. [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr Bernard Jenkin (Harwich and North Essex) (Con): Will my right hon. Friend give an undertaking that BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS there will be no move to hold a referendum on voting reform on the same day as any other elections, after the LONDON LOCAL AUTHORITIES AND TRANSPORT FOR ruling given by the House of Lords Select Committee LONDON (NO.2)BILL [LORDS] on the Constitution, which said: Lords message (15 June) relating to the Bill considered. “we recommend there should be a presumption against holding Resolved, referendums on the same day as elections”? That this House concurs with the Lords in their Resolution.—(The Chairman of Ways and Means.) The Deputy Prime Minister: As I have said, we will shortly come forward—I hope to do so well before the TRANSPORT FOR LONDON (SUPPLEMENTAL TOLL summer recess—to set out our plans for a referendum PROVISIONS)BILL [LORDS] to give people in this country the choice to choose, if Lords message (15 June) relating to the Bill considered.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2015 Election Results
    GENERAL ELECTION 2015 ● ELECTION RESULTS CONSTITUENCY INCUMBENT PARTY WINNING CANDIDATE PARTY MAJORITY GAIN/HOLD Aberavon Hywel Francis Lab Stephen Kinnock Lab 10,445 HOLD Aberconwy Guto Bebb Con Guto Bebb Con 3,999 HOLD Aberdeen North Frank Doran Lab Kirsty Blackman SNP 13,396 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Aberdeen South Anne Begg Lab Callum McCaig SNP 7,230 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Airdrie and Shotts Pamela Nash Lab Neil Gray SNP 8,779 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Aldershot Gerald Howarth Con Gerald Howarth Con 14,901 HOLD Aldridge-Brownhills Richard Shepherd Con Wendy Morton Con 11,723 HOLD Altrincham and Sale West Graham Brady Con Graham Brady Con 13,290 HOLD Alyn and Deeside Mark Tami Lab Mark Tami Lab 3,343 HOLD Amber Valley Nigel Mills Con Nigel Mills Con 4,205 HOLD Angus Michael Weir SNP Michael Weir SNP 11,230 HOLD Arfon Hywel Williams PC Hywel Williams PC 3,668 HOLD Argyll and Bute Alan Reid Lib Dem Brendan O'Hara SNP 8,473 SNP GAIN FROM LIB DEM Arundel and South Downs Nick Herbert Con Nick Herbert Con 26,177 HOLD prepared by connect intelligence 1 ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● GENERAL ELECTION 2015 ● ELECTION RESULTS Ashfield Gloria De Piero Lab Gloria De Piero Lab 8,820 HOLD Ashford Damian Green Con Damian Green Con 19,296 HOLD Ashton-under-Lyne David Heyes Lab Angela Rayner Lab 10,756 HOLD Aylesbury David Lidington Con David Lidington Con 17,158 HOLD Ayr, Carrick and Cumnock Sandra Osborne Lab Corri Wilson SNP 11,265 SNP GAIN FROM LAB Banbury Tony Baldry Con Victoria Prentis Con 18,395 HOLD Banff and Buchan Eilidh Whiteford SNP Eilidh Whiteford SNP
    [Show full text]
  • The Referendum on Separation for Scotland, Session 2013–14
    House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee The Referendum on Separation for Scotland, Session 2013–14 Oral and written evidence Volume IV Oral evidence ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 4 September, 23, and 29 October, 12 November and 10 December 2013, 8 15 and 29 January, 4, 5 and 26 February and 5 March 2014 Written evidence ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 04 September 2013 HC 140-II Published on 24 March 2014 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £23.00 The Scottish Affairs Committee The Scottish Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Scotland Office (including (i) relations with the Scottish Parliament and (ii) administration and expenditure of the offices of the Advocate General for Scotland (but excluding individual cases and advice given within government by the Advocate General)). Current membership Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour/Co-op, Glasgow South West) (Chair) Mike Crockart MP (Liberal Democrat, Edinburgh West) Jim McGovern MP (Labour, Dundee West) Graeme Morrice MP (Labour, Livingston) Pamela Nash MP (Labour, Airdrie and Shotts) Sir Jim Paice MP (Conservative, South East Cambridgeshire) Simon Reevell MP (Conservative, Dewsbury) Mr Alan Reid MP (Liberal Democrat, Argyll and Bute) Lindsay Roy MP (Labour, Glenrothes) Dr Eilidh Whiteford MP (Scottish National Party, Banff and Buchan) The following members were also members of the committee during the Parliament: Fiona Bruce MP (Conservative,
    [Show full text]
  • Saturday 24 July 2010
    Saturday 24 July 2010 Session 2010-11 No. 9 Edition No. 1084 House of Commons Weekly Information Bulletin This bulletin includes information on the work of the House of Commons in the period 19 - 23 July 2010 and forthcoming business for 26 - 27 July 2010 Contents House of Commons • Noticeboard .......................................................................................................... 1 • The Week Ahead .................................................................................................. 2 • Order of Oral Questions ....................................................................................... 3 Weekly Business Information • Business of the House of Commons 19 – 23 July 2010 ....................................... 5 Bulletin • Written Ministerial Statements ............................................................................. 7 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Commons 26 – 30 July 2010 .................. 9 • Forthcoming Business of the House of Lords 26 – 30 July 2010 ....................... 14 Editor: Adrian Hitchins Legislation House of Commons Public Legislation Information Office • Public Bills before Parliament 2010/11 .............................................................. 15 London • Bills – Presentation, Publication and Royal Assent ............................................ 20 SW1A 2TT • Public and General Acts 2010/11 ....................................................................... 20 www.parliament.uk • Draft Bills under consideration or published during 2010/11
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Thursday Volume 634 18 January 2018 No. 81 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 18 January 2018 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2018 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 1031 18 JANUARY 2018 1032 reflects upon the consultation that is taking place, or House of Commons whether the consultation will be taking place in any event? Thursday 18 January 2018 Jesse Norman: The consultation will be taking place in any event, and the details will be announced shortly. I The House met at half-past Nine o’clock greatly enjoyed my visit to see the Our Bus group, which is a model of good practice in local community transport. PRAYERS Richard Burden (Birmingham, Northfield) (Lab): I welcome the Minister to his appointment. While I [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] understand that the Government have said that they are not going to end the sections 19 and 22 arrangements, the letter they sent out in July last year has caused what Oral Answers to Questions the Select Committee on Transport has described as paralysis in the not-for-profit sector. Do we not now need clarity from the Government about what they intend to do, so that they can demonstrate real support TRANSPORT for the community transport sector, including for firms such as Shencare in my constituency? The Secretary of State was asked— Jesse Norman: I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman Community Transport: Licensing for welcoming me to my job.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK General Election 2010 In-Depth Report 6 May 2010 and Analysis
    House of Commons The UK General Election 2010 In-depth Report 6 May 2010 and Analysis The UK General Election 2010 In-depth Report 6 May 2010 and Analysis Foreword This report has been produced by the Electoral Reform Society and deals with the facts, figures and trends of the British General Election of May 2010. Its primary author is Lewis Baston, research consultant to the Electoral Reform Society, but these works are never a one-person job. ERS staff Andy White and Alice Delamere have both contributed significantly to the report’s preparation and writing, and Ashley Dé has overseen its production with Eleni Simeou, consultant to ERS*. Lewis Baston is also indebted to the work of Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher (several times over, for the notional results on new boundaries, and for ‘British Electoral Facts’), Ron Johnson, and those who produced the election results and preliminary analysis for the BBC, Press Association and the House of Commons Library. * Magnus Smidak has contributed to the editing of the report and together with other colleagues also worked on the data collection. Contents 04 An unusual election 06 The election results 13 The 2010 election in the nations of the UK 19 A national election? 22 Local representation 27 Constituency results 34 ‘Wasted’ votes in 2010 36 Gender and ethnic representation 42 The marginal seats 47 Electoral system bias 54 Alternative electoral systems 63 Conclusion Introduction The UK General Election 4 6 May 2010 An unusual election The 2010 election saw a number of unique House of Commons majorities have become and interesting features of the campaign and the norm and indeed this pattern is used as the result.
    [Show full text]
  • A Disgrace to the Victims ‘I Was There
    paigaam publications @paigaam2 IMWS57 01924 500 565 [email protected] Voice of Issue 246 September 2013 / Shawwal 1434 FREE Tri-Lingual Monthly Magazine Est 1993 Modi invitation: A disgrace to the victims ‘I was there. Narendra Modi said let the people vent their anger’ Former IPS offi cer Sanjiv Bhutt Over two thousand Muslims he government and the opposition have been heavily criticised of putting corporate gains ahead of justice and brutally murdered including three Thuman rights violation in inviting Gujarat Chief Minister men from Batley. Witnesses saw Narendra Modi to address the House of Commons. The invitation by the ‘Labour Friends of India’ and the ‘Con- women and children being burnt servative Friends of India’ has been viewed as an insult to the victims of the 2002 Gujarat riots, including the brutal murder of alive. More than 200 masjids de- three British citizens from Batley. stroyed. Eleven years on families Modi is widely believed to have given the green light to the murder of thousands of Muslims in the state of Gujarat during are still �ighting for justice. the riots. In 2011 IPS o cer Sanjiv Bhutt signed an a davit Modi has never been cleared of in- saying he was present at a meeting held at Modi’s residence where the Gujarat minister told the o cers not to stop the riots volvement and our politicians send and allow (Hindu extremists) ’ to vent their anger’. Bhutt has since been dismissed from his position at the de- him an invite to address mands of the Gujarat government. our Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • Batley Aid Appeals Raise Over £80,000
    paigaam publications @paigaam2 IMWS57 01924 500 565 [email protected] Voice of Issue 249 December 2013 / Safar 1435 FREE Tri-Lingual Monthly Magazine Est 1993 Batley aid appeals raise over £80,000 he generosity of Batley has ding and food as e ort continue seen the community raise to help victims of communal riots Tin excess of £80,000 for in the region. worthy causes around the world A substantial amount, £35,000 and locally. is also being allocated to help Fundraising has taken place Syrian refugees, this is in addi- since the beginning of this year’s tion to £18,500 which was sent to Ramadhan, with money being Syria in Ramadhan. donated to a charity fund and The poor and destitute in Gaza various dedicated appeals. will also be helped as around Victims of the Muza arnagar ri- £6,000 has been set a side, whilst ots will be among the main ben- £5,000 has already been donated e ciaries of Batley’s generosity. A to help the desperate victims of dedicated appeal for Muza arna- the Typhoon in the Philippines. gar helped raise £12,429 for those But donations aren’t just being displaced in Northern India. distributed internationally, good The IMWS charity fund sub- local causes are also bene tting committee designated some ad- from donations made from the ditional funds towards the Mu- IMWS. za arnagar appeal, taking the Amongst those to bene t lo- total up to £20,000. cally will be the Kirklees Mayor’s Overseen by the Tayyab Hos- Appeal.
    [Show full text]
  • High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’S Future Consultation Summary Report
    dialoguebydesign making consultation work High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future Consultation Summary Report November 2011 A report to HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport Prepared by Dialogue by Design dialoguebydesign making consultation work High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain’s Future Consultation Summary Report November 2011 A report to HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport Prepared by Dialogue by Design Email: [email protected] Website: www.dialoguebydesign.net The information or guidance in this document (including third party information, products and services), is provided by the Department for Transport on an 'as is' basis, without any representation or endorsement made and without warranty of any kind whether express or implied. The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.dft.gov.uk General email enquiries [email protected] Queen’s Printer and Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 2011, except where otherwise stated Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected].
    [Show full text]