DOCSLIB.ORG

Ethnic Mixing in Manchester

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ethnic Mixing in Manchester LOCAL DYNAMICS OF DIVERSITY: EVIDENCE FROM THE 2011 CENSUS OCTOBER 2013 Prepared by ESRC Centre on Dynamics of Ethnicity (CoDE) Ethnic mixing in Manchester Summary • Ethnic minority groups in Manchester (those other than White British) have grown, and Figure 1. Change in ethnic group segregation live in more even mixed areas in 2011 than in Greater Manchester, 1991-2011 before. Separation in Separation in Separation in • Every ethnic group measured in the census, except 1991 2001 2011 Chinese, is more evenly spread in 2011 than 1991 100 across Greater Manchester wards. 90 • The decreased separation of the White, Caribbean, African, Indian, Pakistani and 80 Bangladeshi groups is a result of dispersal away 70 from the areas where they have been traditionally clustered. 60 • Eight out of 10 of the most diverse wards in 50 Greater Manchester are in Manchester. 40 - Moss Side is the most diverse ward in 30 Manchester. 20 • The population in Manchester and the rest of Greater Manchester is not only becoming more 10 ethnically mixed residentially, but also within households. 0 - The proportion of people living in multiple Caribbean African ethnic group households has increased in Indian Pakistani all districts in Greater Manchester. Excluding White Bangladeshi one person households, 25% of households in Manchester include people from more than one Chinese ethnic group as compared with 12% nationally. Notes: Separation (Index of Dissimilarity) across 215 wards in Bolton, Bury, Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale, Salford, Stockport, Tameside, - The Mixed ethnic group has increased by Trafford, Wigan. 100% indicates complete separation. 0% indicates 71% and accounts for 4% of the population completely even spread of a group. (or 23,200) in Manchester. 1 www.ethnicity.ac.uk Ethnic mixing in Manchester Measuring segregation Figure 2. Change in ethnic group segregation in The most commonly used measure of segregation is Greater Manchester, 2001-2011 (White and Mixed the Index of Dissimilarity, which calculates a summary ethnic groups) measure of the spread of a group across space compared with the spread of the rest of the population. Separation in Separation in It is often referred to as the Segregation Index. The 2001 2011 Segregation Index is calculated by comparing the percentage of a group’s total population in Bolton, 100 Bury, Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale, Salford, 90 Stockport, Tameside, Trafford and Wigan that lives in a ward with the percentage of the rest of the population 80 that lives in the same ward. The absolute difference 70 is added up across the 215 wards, and then halved so that the index is between 0 and 100, with 0% 60 indicating a completely even spread of the population 50 and 100% meaning complete separation. Values of the Segregation Index tend to be higher when they 40 are based on smaller areas because they magnify the 30 differences between places. 20 10 Residential mixing 0 Measuring residential ethnic segregation is a challenge because its meaning and measurement have become White British politically loaded. Figure 1 shows the Segregation Index White Irish (see box) for Greater Manchester1 for ethnic groups that can be measured in each of the last three censuses. The Mixed White-Caribbean Segregation Index shows that the Bangladeshi group (76%) was most separated and the Chinese group (35%) was the Mixed White-African least separated in 1991. Mixed White-Asian 1 includes Bolton, Bury, Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale, Salford, Stockport, Tameside, Trafford, Wigan. Other White During the 1990s the separation of each ethnic group Notes: Separation (Index of Dissimilarity) across 215 wards in decreased, except for the Chinese group. There has been Bolton, Bury, Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale, Salford, Stockport, continued spreading out during the 2000s for the African, Tameside, Trafford, Wigan. 100% indicates complete separation. Indian, Caribbean and Pakistani groups. The increased 0% indicates completely even spread of a group. separation of the Chinese group from a very low base reflects a national trend and is likely to be a result of the settlement of new migrants attending higher education institutions which grew rapidly during this period. The decreased separation of other minority groups represents residential dispersal across Greater Manchester and beyond. The groups that have only been identified by the census since 2001 are shown in Figure 2. The White Irish, White Other and Mixed groups are more evenly spread through Greater Manchester than other ethnic groups. They have all become more evenly spread throughout the region, except for the White Other group. This group almost doubled in size during the decade and its increased segregation is likely to reflect immigration of new migrant groups to ‘gateway’ parts of Manchester, including City Centre ward. Nonetheless, the group is less segregated than most other ethnic groups with an index value of 30%. 2 www.ethnicity.ac.uk Ethnic mixing in Manchester Ethnically diverse wards in Figure 3. Super-diversity in Manchester, 2011 Greater Manchester Totalpopulation, 22,562 Diversity can be measured by calculating how close a ward ) ) % % ) is to having an equal number of residents in each ethnic 7 6 ( ( % e 8 n t ( i group (see box). The most diverse ward in Manchester a White British i h n s Cheetham Pakistani (28%) a A W c is Moss Side with a standardised value (0 to 100) of 40. (29%) i r r r e f e h A h t The average for England and Wales is 3.6, with the most t O diverse wards in parts of inner London where the value is O as high as 50. Figure 3 shows that no one ethnic group accounts for more than a third of the population in Moss Side and Cheetham wards. In Moss Side, the White British group is the largest (26%), followed by African (17%), Totalpopulation, 18,902 ) ) Caribbean (10%), Pakistani (7%), Other Black (7%) and ) % ) ) % % 5 % 7 0 ( % ( 7 1 7 e ( Other White (5%). Eight of the 10 most diverse wards in ( k t 1 i i c ( n White Britsh n h a a l n Moss Side a e Greater Manchester are in Manchester: Moss Side, Ardwick, a t B W s b (26%) c r i i r b r e k i e f a r Cheetham, Rusholme, Longsight, Whalley Range, Hulme h h t A a t P C O and Crumpsall. Clifford ward, Trafford and Central Rochdale O ward, Rochdale are the only wards outside Manchester Notes: labels show ethnic groups which that are among the ten most diverse wards in Greater account more than 5% of the population. Manchester. Figure 4. Growth in households with more than one ethnic group in Greater Manchester districts, 2001-2011 30% ) % ( p u o 25% r g c i n h t 20% e 1 n a h t 15% e r o m h t i 10% w s d l o h 5% e s u o H 0% Manchester Trafford Salford Bury Stockport Rochdale Bolton Oldham Tameside Wigan 2001 2011 Notes: horizontal line indicates national average. Measured as a proportion of households with two or more people. 3 www.ethnicity.ac.uk Ethnic mixing in Manchester Measuring diversity but also in terms of the ethnic diversity within households and families. Figure 4 shows that the proportion of Ecologists have a very useful notion of diversity which households with two or more people that contain people is applied to calculate how closely each ward in Bolton, from more than one ethnic group (i.e. multiple ethnic Bury, Manchester, Oldham, Rochdale, Salford, Stockport, group households) grew during the 2000s in each Greater Tameside, Trafford, and Wigan is to having an equal Manchester district. Multiple ethnic group households number of each ethnic group measured in the census. account for a quarter of households in Manchester, above Called the ‘Reciprocal Diversity Index’, the ecologists the national average of 12%. The proportion is considerably sum each of the eighteen ethnic group proportions, first higher than any other district in Greater Manchester. The squaring them, and divide into 1. The Index is greatest proportion is lowest in Wigan (4%). when there are equal numbers in each group, when it is The number of people with a Mixed ethnic identity provides equal to 18, and lowest when there is only one group in an indication of the most intimate form of integration of an area, when it is equal to 1. The index is standardised peoples. Nationally, the proportion of people with a Mixed by stretching it to be always within the range 0 to 100. ethnic identity is 1.2 million or 2.2% of the population. It The average across Manchester is 11 and England & has increased by more than three quarters from 672,000 Wales is 3.6. in 2001. There has been a similar level of increase in Manchester (see Figure 5). The Mixed population accounts Mixing within households and families for 4% of the population in Manchester. The largest Mixed ethnic group in Manchester is the White-Caribbean group The population in Manchester and the rest of England (8,877). Each of the Mixed ethnic groups has grown by and Wales is not only becoming more mixed residentially, more than three-quarters since 2001. Figure 5. Growth of Mixed ethnic group population in Manchester, 2001-2011 2011 23,131 9,997 15,657 11,925 2001 13,472 5,050 8,780 6,583 Mixed White-Caribbean Mixed White-African Mixed White-Asian Mixed Other This briefing is one in a series, Local dynamics of diversity: evidence from the 2011 Census. Author: Stephen Jivraj Centre on Dynamics of Ethnicity (CoDE) The University of Manchester Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK email: [email protected] www.ethnicity.ac.uk 4 www.ethnicity.ac.uk.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Sheffield Hallam University Thesis
    Exploring the potential of complexity theory in urban regeneration processes. MOOBELA, Cletus. Available from the Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive (SHURA) at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/20078/ A Sheffield Hallam University thesis This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Please visit http://shura.shu.ac.uk/20078/ and http://shura.shu.ac.uk/information.html for further details about copyright and re-use permissions. Fines are charged at 50p per hour JMUQ06 V-l 0 9 MAR ?R06 tjpnO - -a. t REFERENCE ProQuest Number: 10697385 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10697385 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Exploring the Potential of Complexity Theory in Urban Regeneration Processes Cletus Moobela A Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of Sheffield Hallam University for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy July 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The carrying out and completion of this research project was a stimulating experience for me in an area that I have come to develop an ever-increasing amount of personal interest.
    [Show full text]
  • 14-1676 Number One First Street
    Getting to Number One First Street St Peter’s Square Metrolink Stop T Northbound trams towards Manchester city centre, T S E E K R IL T Ashton-under-Lyne, Bury, Oldham and Rochdale S M Y O R K E Southbound trams towardsL Altrincham, East Didsbury, by public transport T D L E I A E S ST R T J M R T Eccles, Wythenshawe and Manchester Airport O E S R H E L A N T L G D A A Connections may be required P L T E O N N A Y L E S L T for further information visit www.tfgm.com S N R T E BO S O W S T E P E L T R M Additional bus services to destinations Deansgate-Castle field Metrolink Stop T A E T M N I W UL E E R N S BER E E E RY C G N THE AVENUE ST N C R T REE St Mary's N T N T TO T E O S throughout Greater Manchester are A Q A R E E S T P Post RC A K C G W Piccadilly Plaza M S 188 The W C U L E A I S Eastbound trams towards Manchester city centre, G B R N E R RA C N PARKER ST P A Manchester S ZE Office Church N D O C T T NN N I E available from Piccadilly Gardens U E O A Y H P R Y E SE E N O S College R N D T S I T WH N R S C E Ashton-under-Lyne, Bury, Oldham and Rochdale Y P T EP S A STR P U K T T S PEAK EET R Portico Library S C ET E E O E S T ONLY I F Alighting A R T HARDMAN QU LINCOLN SQ N & Gallery A ST R E D EE S Mercure D R ID N C SB T D Y stop only A E E WestboundS trams SQUAREtowards Altrincham, East Didsbury, STR R M EN Premier T EET E Oxford S Road Station E Hotel N T A R I L T E R HARD T E H O T L A MAN S E S T T NationalS ExpressT and otherA coach servicesO AT S Inn A T TRE WD ALBERT R B L G ET R S S H E T E L T Worsley – Eccles –
    [Show full text]
  • Hulme, Moss Side and Rusholme Neighbourhood Mosaic Profile
    Hulme, Moss Side and Rusholme Neighbourhood Mosaic Profile Summary • There are just over 21,300 households in the Hulme, Moss Side and Rusholme Neighbourhood. • The neighbourhood contains a range of different household types clustered within different parts of the area. Moss Side is dominated by relatively deprived, transient single people renting low cost accommodation whereas Hulme and Rusholme wards contain larger concentrations of relatively affluent young people and students. • Over 60% of households in Moss Side contain people whose social circumstances suggest that they may need high or very high levels of support to help them manage their own health and prevent them becoming high users of acute healthcare services in the future. However, the proportion of households in the other parts of the neighbourhood estimated to require this levels of support is much lower. This reflects the distribution of different types of household within the locality as described above. Introduction This profile provides more detailed information about the people who live in different parts of the neighbourhood. It draws heavily on the insights that can be gained from the Mosaic population segmentation tool. What is Mosaic? Mosaic is a population segmentation tool that uses a range of data and analytical methods to provide insights into the lifestyles and behaviours of the public in order to help make more informed decisions. Over 850 million pieces of information across 450 different types of data are condensed using the latest analytical techniques to identify 15 summary groups and 66 detailed types that are easy to interpret and understand. Mosaic’s consistent segmentation can also provide a ‘common currency’ across partners within the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Whalley Range and Around Key
    Edition Winter 2013/14 Winter Edition 2 nd Things about Historical facts, trivia and other things of interest Alexandra Park Manley Hall Primitive Methodist College The blitz 1 9 Wealthy textile merchant 12 Renamed Hartley Victoria College after its 16 The bombs started dropping on The beginning: Designed Samuel Mendel built a 50 benefactor Sir William P Hartley, was opened in Manchester during Christmas 1940 with by Alexander Hennell and the Range room mansion in the 1879 to train men to be religious ministers. homes in the Manley Park area taking opened in 1870, the fully + MORE + | CLUBS SPORTS | PARKS | SCHOOLS | HISTORY | LISTINGS | TRIVIA 1860s, with extensive Now known as Hartley Hall, it is an several direct hits. Terraced houses in public park (named after gardens running beyond independent school. Cromwell Avenue were destroyed and are Princess Alexandra) was an Bury Avenue and as far as noticeable by the different architecture. During oasis away from the smog PC Nicholas Cock, a murder Clarendon Road (pictured air raids people would make their way to a of the city and “served to 13 In the 1870s a policeman was fatally wounded left). Mendel’s business shelter, one of which was (and still is!) 2.5m deter the working men whilst investigating a disturbance at a house collapsed when the Suez under Manley Park and held up to 500 people. of Manchester from the near to what was once the Seymour Hotel. The Origins: Whalley Range was one of Manchester’s, and in fact Canal opened and he was The entrance was at the corner of York Avenue alehouses on their day off”.
    [Show full text]
  • Q05a 2011 Census Summary
    Ward Summary Factsheet: 2011 Census Q05a • The largest ward is Cheetham with 22,562 residents, smallest is Didsbury West with 12,455 • City Centre Ward has grown 156% since 2001 (highest) followed by Hulme (64%), Cheetham (49%), Ardwick (37%), Gorton South (34%), Ancoats and Clayton (33%), Bradford (29%) and Moss Side (27%). These wards account for over half the city’s growth • Miles Platting and Newton Heath’s population has decreased since 2001(-5%) as has Moston (-0.2%) • 81,000 (16%) Manchester residents arrived in the UK between 2001 and 2011, mostly settling in City Centre ward (33% of ward’s current population), its neighbouring wards and Longsight (30% of current population) • Chorlton Park’s population has grown by 26% but only 8% of its residents are immigrants • Gorton South’s population of children aged 0-4 has increased by 87% since 2001 (13% of ward population) followed by Cheetham (70%), Crumpsall (68%), Charlestown (66%) and Moss Side (60%) • Moss Side, Gorton South, Crumpsall and Cheetham have around 25% more 5-15 year olds than in 2001 whereas Miles Platting and Newton Heath, Woodhouse Park, Moston and Withington have around 20-25% fewer. City Centre continues to have very few children in this age group • 18-24 year olds increased by 288% in City Centre since 2001 adding 6,330 residents to the ward. Ardwick, Hulme, Ancoats and Clayton and Bradford have also grown substantially in this age group • Didsbury West has lost 18-24 aged population (-33%) since 2001, followed by Chorlton (-26%) • City Centre working age population has grown by 192% since 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Minor Eye Conditions Service (MECS) Tameside and Glossop Pharmacies That Are Currently Providing Mecs
    Minor Eye Conditions Service (MECS) Tameside and Glossop Pharmacies that are currently providing MECs Name Address Telephone 169 Mossley Road, Ashton-under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL6 Adams Pharmacy 6NE 0161 339 8889 Stalybridge Resource Centre, 2 Waterloo Road, Stalybridge. Adams Pharmacy SK15 2AU 0161 303 8599 Alipharma Ltd Thornley House Med Ctr) 11 Thornley Street, Hyde SK14 1JY 0161 351 1386 Asda Cavendish Street, Ashton Under Lyne, OL6 7DP 0161 342 6610 Asda Water Street, Hyde, Cheshire, SK14 1BD 0161 882 5700 22 Stockport Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL7 Ashton Pharmacy 0LB 0161 330 4389 Ashton Primary Care Centre Pharmacy 193 Old Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Lancashire, OL6 7SR 0161 820 8281 Audenshaw Pharmacy 3 Chapel Street, Audenshaw, Manchester, M34 5DE 0161 320 9123 Boots 116-118 Station Road, Hadfield, Glossop SK13 1AJ 01457 853635 Hattersley Health Centre, Hattersley Road East, Hattersley, Boots Hyde SK14 3EH 0161 368 8498 Boots 72 Market Street, Droylsden, Manchester M43 6DE 0161 370 1626 Boots 30 Concorde Way, Dukinfield, Cheshire SK16 4DB 0161 330 3586 Boots 173 Mossley Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 6NE 0161 330 1303 Boots 1-3 Bow Street, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 6BU 0161 330 1746 Boots UK Ltd 15-17 Staveleigh Way, Ashton-Under-Lyne OL6 7JL 0161 308 2326 Boots UK Ltd 19 High Street West, Glossop, Derbyshire SK13 8AL 01457 852011 Boots UK Ltd 1A Market Place, Hyde, Cheshire SK14 2LX 0161 368 2249 Boots UK Ltd 33 Queens Walk, Droylsden, Manchester M43 7AD 0161 370 1402 Crown Point North, Retail Park, Ashton Road, Denton M34
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Community Health Services
    Children’s Community Health Services Quick Facts Document Content Service Vision ……..………………………………………………………………………………..Page 3 Children and young person’s health service……………………………………………Page 5 Management Structure……………………………………………………………………Page 6 Universal services Health Visiting ……………………………………………………………………………..Page 7 School Health………………………………………………………………………………Page 8 Healthy Schools……………………………………………………………………………Page 9 Immunisation Team………………………………………………………………………..Page 10 Newborn Hearing Screening Programme……………………………………………....Page 11 Specialist Services Audiology …………………………………………………………………………………..Page 12 Community Children’s Nursing Team……………………………………………………Page 13 Physiotherapy……………………………………………………………………………...Page 14 Speech and Language Therapy………………………………………………………….Page 15 Orthoptics …………………………………………………………………………………..Page 15 Community Paediatrics…………………………………………………………………....Page 16 Occupational Therapy …………………………………………………………………….Page 17 Special Needs School Nursing and Dietetics…………………………………………...Page 17 Vulnerable Baby Service………………………………………………………………….Page 18 Child Health ………………………………………………………………………………..Page 18 Page 2 Children’s Community Health Services Directorate Strategy 2015 – 2019 1.0 Vision Our vision for Children’s Community Health Services is for every child in Manchester to have the best health possible. Our strapline, which will appear on our e-mails, is: “Working together to enable every child to have the best health possible” 1.1 We will aim to achieve our vision by: Delivering services which meet the health needs of children and
    [Show full text]
  • North Locality: Life Expectancy
    TRAFFORD NORTH LOCALITY HEALTH PROFILE JANUARY 2021 NORTH LOCALITY: WARDS • Clifford: Small and densely populated ward at north-east tip of the borough. Dense residential area of Victorian terraced housing and a diverse range of housing stock. Clifford has a diverse population with active community groups The area is undergoing significant transformation with the Old Trafford Master Plan. • Gorse Hill: Northern most ward with the third largest area size. Trafford town hall, coronation street studio and Manchester United stadium are located in this ward. Media city development on the Salford side has led to significant development in parts of the ward. Trafford Park and Humphrey Park railway stations serve the ward for commuting to both Manchester and Liverpool. • Longford: Longford is a densely populated urban area in north east of the Borough. It is home to the world famous Lancashire County Cricket Club. Longford Park, one of the Borough's larger parks, has been the finishing point for the annual Stretford Pageant. Longford Athletics stadium can also be found adjacent to the park. • Stretford: Densely populated ward with the M60 and Bridgewater canal running through the ward. The ward itself does not rank particularly highly in terms of deprivation but has pockets of very high deprivation. Source: Trafford Data Lab, 2020 NORTH LOCALITY: DEMOGRAPHICS • The North locality has an estimated population of 48,419 across the four wards (Clifford, Gorse Hill, Stretford & Longford) (ONS, 2019). • Data at the ward level suggests that all 4 wards in the north locality are amongst the wards with lowest percentages of 65+ years population (ONS, 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Framework Users (Clients)
    TC622 – NORTH WEST CONSTRUCTION HUB MEDIUM VALUE FRAMEWORK (2019 to 2023) Framework Users (Clients) Prospective Framework users are as follows: Local Authorities - Cheshire - Cheshire East Council - Cheshire West and Chester Council - Halton Borough Council - Warrington Borough Council; Cumbria - Allerdale Borough Council - Copeland Borough Council - Barrow in Furness Borough Council - Carlisle City Council - Cumbria County Council - Eden District Council - South Lakeland District Council; Greater Manchester - Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council - Bury Metropolitan Borough Council - Manchester City Council – Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council - Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council - Salford City Council – Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council - Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council - Trafford Metropolitan Borough - Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council; Lancashire - Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council – Blackpool Borough Council - Burnley Borough Council - Chorley Borough Council - Fylde Borough Council – Hyndburn Borough Council - Lancashire County Council - Lancaster City Council - Pendle Borough Council – Preston City Council - Ribble Valley Borough Council - Rossendale Borough Council - South Ribble Borough Council - West Lancashire Borough Council - Wyre Borough Council; Merseyside - Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council - Liverpool City Council - Sefton Council - St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council - Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council; Police Authorities - Cumbria Police Authority - Lancashire Police Authority - Merseyside
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Free School – Opening September 2018 Report on Section 10 Public Consultation 9Th June 2017-8Th September 2017
    Laurus Ryecroft Proposed free school – opening September 2018 Report on Section 10 public consultation th th 9 June 2017-8 September 2017 laurustrust.co.uk 4 October 17 Page 1 of 21 Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................... 3 The proposer group ............................................................................................................... 4 Initial phase ........................................................................................................................... 4 Statutory consultation ............................................................................................................ 6 Stakeholders ......................................................................................................................... 7 Statutory consultation results and responses ........................................................................ 9 Other responses to the consultation .................................................................................... 18 Conclusion and next steps .................................................................................................. 21 Appendices: Appendix 1 – Section 10 consultation information booklet Appendix 2 – Consultation questionnaire Appendix 3 – Promotional material Appendix 4 – Stakeholders laurustrust.co.uk 4 October 17 Page 2 of 21 Executive summary Laurus Ryecroft is a non-selective, non-denominational 11-18 secondary school in the pre-opening
    [Show full text]
  • 72, Carlton Road, Ashton-Under-Lyne, Tameside, Greater Manchester, OL6 8PZ Offers Over £150,000
    EPC Awaited 72, Carlton Road, Ashton-under-Lyne, Tameside, Greater Manchester, OL6 8PZ Offers Over £150,000 Two double bedroom period terraced. Enjoying a convenient location close to Ashton Town Centre with excellent shopping facilities including Ashton Moss retail park, Ladysmith shopping centre and Snipe retail park. A short distance to both the Metrolink and Train station with routes to Manchester and other surrounding areas. Serviced by the M60 motorway network for those needing to commute to other cities and located close to Tameside general hospital and excellent local schooling. This handsome period property is full of character, traditional features and has a hearty/homely feeling. Deceptive from the front as internally you will find a brilliant space and large rooms, high ceilings and an airy bright arrangement. Comprising of; a traditional entrance hallway leading to both the front lounge and the rear dining room, patio doors leading out into the courtyard to enjoy the sunshine, a galley kitchen with fitted wall and base units, two very large double bedrooms which could easily be turned into three, a family bathroom with three piece suite and a small garden to the front. A lovely front facing aspect over the green makes this house even more appealing. This property is sure to attract early attention so don't delay and call the team to secure your viewing today. Viewing arrangement by appointment 0161 339 5499 [email protected] Bridgfords, 6 Fletcher Street, Ashton Under Lyne, OL6 6BY https://www.bridgfords.co.uk Interested parties should satisfy themselves, by inspection or otherwise as to the accuracy of the description given and any floor plans shown in these property details.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Transport Capital Funding Schemes
    Local Transport Capital Funding Schemes Scheme Location Ward Ash Lane - Between Grove Lane and Lichfield Avenue Bowdon Basford Road Longford Bollin Drive Timperley Canterbury Road Davyhulme West Cavendish Road (junction with Ashley Road & Portland Road) Bowdon Chepstow Avenue junction with Firs Way St Mary's Coniston Road Gorse Hill Cornhill Avenue Davyhulme West Craig Avenue Urmston Darley Road Clifford Eastway junction with Langdale Road Brooklands Glebelands Road - Park Road junction Ashton Upon Mersey Greenway Altrincham Hale Road (Various locations between Hill Top and Park Road) Hale Barns Hope Road, junction Glenthorn Road Priory Humphrey Lane Urmston Irlam Road Flixton Kingsway Stretford Kirkstall Road junction with Furness Road Davyhulme East Langdale Road junction with Washway Road Brooklands Langdale Road - No Entry end Brooklands Leamington Road Davyhulme West Leicester Road near Junction with Ollerbarrow Road Hale Central Lulworth Avenue Flixton Lytham Road Flixton Malvern Avenue Urmston Manchester Road Bucklow St Martins Marlborough Road junction with Irlam Road Flixton Marlborough Road Priory Marsland Road (outside Broughton Mews) Priory Moorlands Avenue Davyhulme West Northenden Road Sale Moor Northenden Road Priory Northumberland Road Clifford Oaklea Road junction with Firs Road St Mary's Old Crofts Bank Davyhulme East Park Drive/Park Avenue Hale Central Park Road, Malpas Drive Timperley Park Road - opposite Brookfield Drive Timperley Park Road - several Locations Timperley Princess Road - junction of Charleston to Pelican
    [Show full text]