Second World War Casualty Lists Released
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics
American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics Updated July 29, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32492 American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics Summary This report provides U.S. war casualty statistics. It includes data tables containing the number of casualties among American military personnel who served in principal wars and combat operations from 1775 to the present. It also includes data on those wounded in action and information such as race and ethnicity, gender, branch of service, and cause of death. The tables are compiled from various Department of Defense (DOD) sources. Wars covered include the Revolutionary War, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, the Civil War, the Spanish-American War, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam Conflict, and the Persian Gulf War. Military operations covered include the Iranian Hostage Rescue Mission; Lebanon Peacekeeping; Urgent Fury in Grenada; Just Cause in Panama; Desert Shield and Desert Storm; Restore Hope in Somalia; Uphold Democracy in Haiti; Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF); Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF); Operation New Dawn (OND); Operation Inherent Resolve (OIR); and Operation Freedom’s Sentinel (OFS). Starting with the Korean War and the more recent conflicts, this report includes additional detailed information on types of casualties and, when available, demographics. It also cites a number of resources for further information, including sources of historical statistics on active duty military deaths, published lists of military personnel killed in combat actions, data on demographic indicators among U.S. military personnel, related websites, and relevant CRS reports. Congressional Research Service American War and Military Operations Casualties: Lists and Statistics Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... -
Annual Report on Civilian Casualties in Connection with United States Military Operations in 2019
UNCLASSIFIED Department of Defense Annual Report on Civilian Casualties In Connection With United States Military Operations in 2019 Submitted pursuant to Section 1057 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115-91), as amended The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $20,000 for the 2020 Fiscal Year. This includes $25 in expenses and $20,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2020April22 A-60DF323 1 UNCLASSIFIED Section 1057 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115- 91), as amended, states the following: Annual Report on Civilian Casualties in Connection With United States Military Operations (a) ANNUAL REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than May 1 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on civilian casualties caused as a result of United States military operations during the preceding year. (b) ELEMENTS.—Each report under subsection (a) shall set forth the following: (1) A list of all the United States military operations, including each specific mission, strike, engagement, raid, or incident, during the year covered by such report that were confirmed, or reasonably suspected, to have resulted in civilian casualties. (2) For each military operation listed pursuant to paragraph (1), each of the following: (A) The date. (B) The location. (C) An identification of whether the operation occurred inside or outside of a declared theater of active armed conflict. (D) The type of operation. (E) An assessment of the number of civilian and enemy combatant casualties, including a differentiation between those killed and those injured. -
National Mortality Profile of Active Duty Personnel in the U.S. Armed Forces: 1980-1993/NIOSH Pub. No. NO. 96-103/Contents Page
National Mortality Profile of Active Duty Personnel in the U.S. Armed Forces: 1980-1993/NIOSH Pub. No. NO. 96-103/Contents Page National Mortality Profile of Active Duty Personnel in the U.S. Armed Forces: 1980-1993 Table of Contents FOREWORD ACKNOWLEDGMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AUTHORS LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES METHODS Military Casualty Data Limitations of the WCS Data Military Strength (Employment) Data Definition of Cause of Death Categories RESULTS All Services All Causes Unintentional Injury Disease and Illness Suicide Homicide Air Force All Causes Unintentional Injury Disease and Illness Suicide Homicide Army All Causes Unintentional Injury Disease and Illness Suicide Homicide http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-103/tacon.html[10/23/2012 9:44:01 AM] National Mortality Profile of Active Duty Personnel in the U.S. Armed Forces: 1980-1993/NIOSH Pub. No. NO. 96-103/Contents Page Marine Corps All Causes Unintentional Injury Disease and Illness Suicide Homicide Navy All Causes Unintentional Injury Disease and Illness Suicide Homicide DISCUSSION REFERENCES APPENDIX I APPENDIX II Delivering on the Nation's Promise: Safety and Health at Work for all People... Through Research and Prevention Back to the Cover Page NIOSH Home | NIOSH Search | Site Index | Contact Us http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/96-103/tacon.html[10/23/2012 9:44:01 AM] National Mortality Profile of Active Duty Personnel in the U.S. Armed Forces: 1980-1993/NIOSH Pub. No. NO. 96-103/Foreword Page National Mortality Profile of Active Duty Personnel in the U.S. Armed Forces: 1980-1993 FOREWORD We dedicate this report to the memory of the thousands of men and women who have died while actively serving their country in the U.S. -
Analysis of Casualty Rates & Patterns Likely to Result from Military
Analysis of Casualty Rates & Patterns Likely to Result from Military Operations in Urban Environments Study by Colonel (Retd) RA Leitch MBE RGN Dr. HR Champion F.R.C.S (Edin) F.A.C.S. Dr. JF Navein MB ChB M.RC.G.P. CWL/TechMed/11/97 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………… .................………………..…….……3 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................................................................................................4 REQUIREMENT ................................................................................................................................................................5 PHASED APPROACH......................................................................................................................................................5 PHASE 1.........................................................................................................................................................................5 PHASE 2.........................................................................................................................................................................5 EXISTING STUDIES AND DATABASES................................................................................................................5 CASUALTY RATES AND ESTIMATES..................................................................................................................5 GROUND FORCE CASUALTY RATE PATTERNS ................................................................................................6 -
Afghan Civilians Than at Any Time in Its History
Afghanistan’s Rising Civilian Death Toll Due to Airstrikes, 2017-2020 Neta C. Crawford1 December 7, 2020 Summary: When the United States tightens its rules of engagement and restricts air strikes where civilians are at risk, civilian casualties tend to go down; when it loosens those restrictions, civilians are injured and killed in greater numbers. In 2017 the Pentagon relaxed its rules of engagement for airstrikes and escalated the air war in Afghanistan. The aim was to gain leverage at the bargaining table. From 2017 through 2019, civilian deaths due to U.S. and allied forces’ airstrikes in Afghanistan dramatically increased. In 2019 airstrikes killed 700 civilians – more civilians than in any other year since the beginning of the war in 2001 and 2002. After the U.S. and Taliban reached a peace agreement in late February 2020, U.S. and other international air strikes declined – and so did the harm to civilians caused by those strikes. The Afghan government is now negotiating with the Taliban and as part of a broader offensive, perhaps aimed at increasing Afghan government leverage in the talks, air strikes by the Afghan Air Force (AAF) have increased. As a consequence, the AAF is harming more Afghan civilians than at any time in its history. The uptick in civilians killed by AAF airstrikes between July and September 2020 was particularly striking. In the first six months of this year, the AAF killed 86 Afghan civilians and injured 103 civilians in airstrikes. That rate of harm nearly doubled in the next three months. Between July and the end of September, the Afghan Air Force killed 70 civilians and 90 civilians were injured. -
Zero-Casualty Warfare
RICRMARS IRRC MARCH 2000 VOL.82 N°837 165 Zero-casualty warfare by A. P.V. ROGERS here can be no doubt that the political and military plan- ners of the NATO air campaign in the Kosovo conflict of 1999 were determined that it should be carried out strictly Tin accordance with the law of armed conflict. "The targets were exclusively military — every effort was made to avoid collateral damage — planes only fire at targets when we are confident that we can strike accurately — some aircraft in the first operation returned without dropping ordnance. Targets are carefully selected and continuously assessed to avoid collateral damage."1 "Others, and I have said continually this week that our aim is to hit the target and not to cause collateral damage to any sur- rounding areas. You have seen the effects of the bombs that we have dropped and the missiles that we have launched. We need to put those on the target, so if someone is in the cockpit and he has got to see the target all the way down to the ground he has to make sure that he can see that target and if he doesn't he is professional enough to not hit that target and bring his bombs back."2 "Rules of engagement and concerns about collateral dam- age placed on us by our political masters are, rightly, very tautly drawn. The discipline of our people is such that they will not drop their weapons unless they have clearly identified their assigned target and know precisely what they're doing."3 A. -
Annual Report on Civilian Casualties in Connection with United States Military Operations in 2020
UNCLASSIFIED Department of Defense Annual Report on Civilian Casualties In Connection With United States Military Operations in 2020 Submitted pursuant to Section 1057 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115-91), as amended NOTE: An addendum to this report originally posted on defense.gov on June 2, 2021, is included after page 21. The addendum corrects information on pages 7-9 of the original report. The estimated cost of this report for the Department of Defense is approximately $19,000 for Fiscal Year 2021. This includes $0 in expenses and $19,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2021April29 8-09B2AD8 1 UNCLASSIFIED Section 1057 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 (Public Law 115- 91), as amended, states the following: Annual Report on Civilian Casualties in Connection With United States Military Operations (a) ANNUAL REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than May 1 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report on civilian casualties caused as a result of United States military operations during the preceding year. (b) ELEMENTS.—Each report under subsection (a) shall set forth the following: (1) A list of all the United States military operations, including each specific mission, strike, engagement, raid, or incident, during the year covered by such report that were confirmed, or reasonably suspected, to have resulted in civilian casualties. (2) For each military operation listed pursuant to paragraph (1), each of the following: (A) The date. (B) The location. (C) An identification of whether the operation occurred inside or outside of a declared theater of active armed conflict. -
Civil War Manuscripts
CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS MANUSCRIPT READING ROW '•'" -"•••-' -'- J+l. MANUSCRIPT READING ROOM CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS A Guide to Collections in the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress Compiled by John R. Sellers LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON 1986 Cover: Ulysses S. Grant Title page: Benjamin F. Butler, Montgomery C. Meigs, Joseph Hooker, and David D. Porter Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Library of Congress. Manuscript Division. Civil War manuscripts. Includes index. Supt. of Docs, no.: LC 42:C49 1. United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865— Manuscripts—Catalogs. 2. United States—History— Civil War, 1861-1865—Sources—Bibliography—Catalogs. 3. Library of Congress. Manuscript Division—Catalogs. I. Sellers, John R. II. Title. Z1242.L48 1986 [E468] 016.9737 81-607105 ISBN 0-8444-0381-4 The portraits in this guide were reproduced from a photograph album in the James Wadsworth family papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress. The album contains nearly 200 original photographs (numbered sequentially at the top), most of which were autographed by their subjects. The photo- graphs were collected by John Hay, an author and statesman who was Lin- coln's private secretary from 1860 to 1865. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. PREFACE To Abraham Lincoln, the Civil War was essentially a people's contest over the maintenance of a government dedi- cated to the elevation of man and the right of every citizen to an unfettered start in the race of life. President Lincoln believed that most Americans understood this, for he liked to boast that while large numbers of Army and Navy officers had resigned their commissions to take up arms against the government, not one common soldier or sailor was known to have deserted his post to fight for the Confederacy. -
Body-Count.Pdf
Table of Contents Body Count Casualty Figures after 10 Years of the “War on Terror” Iraq Afghanistan Pakistan - 1 - First international edition (March 2015) Table of Contents Body Count Casualty Figures after 10 Years of the “War on Terror” Iraq Afghanistan Pakistan First international edition - Washington DC, Berlin, Ottawa - March 2015 translated from German by Ali Fathollah-Nejad available from the editors: Internationale Ärzte für die Verhütung des Atomkrieges / Ärzte in sozialer Verantwortung (German affiliate), Berlin PSR: Physicians for Social Responsibility (US American affiliate), Washington DC PGS: Physicians for Global Survival (Canandian affiliate), Ottawa of IPPNW (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War) www.ippnw.de www.psr.org www.pgs.ca hardcopies: [email protected] (print on demand) ISBN-13: 978-3-9817315-0-7 - 2 - Table of Contents Table of Contents Preface by Dr. h.c. Hans-C. von Sponeck .......................................................................... 6 Foreword by Physicians for Social Responsibility (USA)............................................ 8 Foreword for the international edition - by IPPNW Germany................................10 Introduction .....................................................................................................................11 Executive Summary.........................................................................................................15 Iraq “Body Count” in Iraq ....................................................................................................19 -
Infantry Platoon Tactical Standing Operating Procedure
Infantry Platoon Tactical Standing Operating Procedure This publication is an extract from FM 7-8 Infantry Rifle Platoon and Squad. It provides the tactical standing operating procedures for infantry platoons and squads and is tailored for ROTC cadet use. The procedures apply unless a leader makes a decision to deviate from them based on the factors of METT-T. In such a case, the exception applies only to the particular situation for which the leader made the decision. ANNEX A. TASK ORGANIZATION (page 2) ANNEX B. COMMAND AND CONTROL (page 3) Appendix 1. Duties and Responsibilities (page 5) Appendix 2. Communication (page 8) Appendix 3. Estimate of the Situation (page 10) Appendix 4. Troop Leading Procedures (page 12) Orders (page 13) Reports (page 18) Appendix 5. Movement (page 19) ANNEX C. OPERATIONS (page 21) Appendix 1. Assembly Area Procedures (page 29) Appendix 2. Patrolling Planning (page 31) Appendix 3. Patrolling: Patrol Base Activities; Friendly Unit Coordination (page 32) Appendix 4. Conduct an Ambush and Hasty Ambush (page 33) Appendix 5. Area Recon, Actions on Capturing POW’s and Land Navigation (page 34) Range Cards and Breaching (SOSR) (page 35) ANNEX D. NBC (page 36) ANNEX E. AIR DEFENSE ARTILLERY (page 37) ANNEX F. FIRE SUPPORT (page 38) ANNEX G. FIRE CONTROL AND DISTRIBUTION (page 40) ANNEX H OPERATIONAL SECURITY (page 43) ANNEX I. COMBAT SERVICE SUPPORT (page 45) ANNEX J. SAFETY (page 48) Appendix 1. Reports (page 49) Appendix 2. Risk Management (page 51) Tab 1. Risk Assessment Matrix (page 52) Tab 2. Training Safety List (page 53) Appendix 3. -
Understanding Combat Casualty Care Statistics
Special Review The Journal of TRAUMA Injury, Infection, and Critical Care Understanding Combat Casualty Care Statistics John B. Holcomb, MD, Lynn G. Stansbury, MD, Howard R. Champion, FRCS, Charles Wade, PhD, and Ronald F. Bellamy, MD Maintaining good hospital records three essential terms: 1) the case fatality What is the overall lethality of the bat- during military conflicts can provide rate (CFR) as percentage of fatalities tlefield? How effective is combat casu- medical personnel and researchers with among all wounded; 2) killed in action alty care? To answer these questions feedback to rapidly adjust treatment (KIA) as percentage of immediate with current data, the three services strategies and improve outcomes. But to deaths among all seriously injured (not have collaboratively created a joint the- convert the resulting raw data into returning to duty); and 3) died of ater trauma registry (JTTR), cataloging meaningful conclusions requires clear wounds (DOW) as percentage of deaths all the serious injuries, procedures, and terminology and well thought out equa- following admission to a medical treat- outcomes for the current war. These def- tions, utilizing consistent numerators ment facility among all seriously injured initions and equations, consistently ap- and denominators. Our objective was to (not returning to duty). These equations plied to the JTTR, will allow meaningful arrive at terminology and equations that were then applied consistently across comparisons and help direct future re- would produce the best insight into the data from the WWII, Vietnam and the search and appropriate application of effectiveness of care at different stages current Global War on Terrorism. Us- personnel. -
Casualty Status As of August 23 2021
IMMEDIATE RELEASE CASUALTY STATUS as of 10 a.m. EDT September 27, 2021 OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM U.S. CASUALTY STATUS1 Total Deaths KIA Non-Hostile Pending WIA OIF U.S. Military Casualties 4,418 3,481 937 0 31,994 OIF U.S. DOD Civilian Casualties 13 9 4 0 Totals 4,431 3,490 941 0 31,994 1 OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM includes casualties that occurred between March 19, 2003, and Aug. 31, 2010, in the Arabian Sea, Bahrain, Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Oman, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Persian Gulf, Qatar, Red Sea, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Casualties in these countries before March 19, 2003, were considered Operation Enduring Freedom. Personnel injured in OIF who die after Sept. 1, 2010, will be included in OIF statistics. OPERATION NEW DAWN U.S. CASUALTY STATUS 2 Total Deaths KIA Non-Hostile Pending WIA OND U.S. Military Casualties 74 38 36 0 298 OND U.S. DOD Civilian Casualties 0 0 0 0 Totals 74 38 36 0 298 2 OPERATION NEW DAWN includes casualties that occurred between Sept. 1, 2010, and Dec. 31, 2011, in the Arabian Sea, Bahrain, Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Oman, Iraq, Kuwait, Oman, Persian Gulf, Qatar, Red Sea, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Personnel injured in OND who die after Dec. 31, 2011, will be included in OND statistics. OPERATION ENDURING FREEDOM U.S. CASUALTY STATUS 3, 4 OEF U.S. Military Casualties Total Deaths KIA Non-Hostile Pending WIA Afghanistan Only 3 2,218 1,833 385 1 20,093 Other Locations 4 130 12 118 0 56 OEF U.S.