Precision Sector

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Precision Sector 05 December 2012 Asia Pacific/Japan Equity Research Office Electronics (Precision (Japan)) / MARKET WEIGHT Precision Sector Research Analysts SECTOR REVIEW Yu Yoshida 81 3 4550 9815 [email protected] Ricoh remains top pick for 2013 amid ongoing consolidation in office-equipment market Figure 1: HW / NHW average LC base sales growth rate (2011-12): Relatively positive for Ricoh Average LC base sales growth rate (2011-2012) (1) Winners of 8% (3) Limited impact consolidation effect from consolidation 6% Lexmark Konica Minolta 4% Brother Ricoh 2% 0% -8% -6% -4% -2% 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% -2% Canon (Laser Fuji Xerox printer) Canon (Copier) Non-hardware Fuji Xerox -4% (Copier) (Laser printer) -6% (4) Unable to offset the (2) Losers of -8% consolidation effect impact from consolidation Hardware Note: × shows copier makers and △ shows laser printer makers Source: Company data, Credit Suisse ■ Summary: The labor equipment ratio (machines in force ÷ number of employees) for office equipment (printers + laser printers) is declining, especially the ratio for single-function laser beam printers (LBPs). In this report, we examine the 2013 office-equipment demand outlook and the positioning of individual companies in the current market environment. ■ Focal points: The office labor equipment ratios for the US and Western Europe are diverging as the ratio has been falling in the US since 2010 while holding near peak levels in Western Europe. The divergence is related to regional differences in (1) the number of large enterprises, (2) the speed of tablet PC diffusion, and (3) the ratio of color multifunction printers. However, tablet PC diffusion in Western Europe is likely to pick up in 2013, raising the probability of a change in office environments that should push down the region’s labor equipment ratio. In the US, meanwhile, improving employment figures (i.e., increase in employed workers) will likely stem the decline in the US labor equipment ratio. Overall, we expect to see improving trends in MIF and shipments in 2013, which should at minimum prevent a rise in concerns about structural instability during the year. ■ Stock call: For 2013, we continue to recommend Ricoh (7752, OUTPERFORM, TP ¥1,300) as our top pick among office-equipment makers. Addition to the recent restructuring effect as emphasized in past reports, we believe Ricoh is best positioned to come out on top amid ongoing market consolidation thanks to a steadily growing non-hardware business aided by MPS knowhow secured via the IKON acquisition. DISCLOSURE APPENDIX CONTAINS ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS AND THE STATUS OF NON US ANALYSTS. US Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS BEYOND INFORMATION™ Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access 05 December 2012 Table of contents Growing gap in US-Euro labor equipment ratios 3 Regional differences in office environments reflect different speeds in consolidation, paperless trends 3 Calculation of labor equipment ratio 3 US-Euro ratio gaps by printer type: Europe high for color multi-function devices, US ratio dragged down by decline in LBPs 4 Factors behind US trend toward consolidation of office equipment 6 Differences in company size 6 Differences in tablet PC penetration 7 Differences in the ratio for color multi-function devices 8 Emerging-economy’s labor equipment ratios still low 9 Current expansion in MIF should continue 9 Office equipment makers’ positioning in consolidating market 10 Ricoh’s firm underfooting: MPS driving PV growth, IKON acquisition not a mistake 10 Original dependence on large corporates has backfired 11 Little consolidation impact on companies focused more on SMBs 12 2013 outlook for office equipment market 13 US ratio nearing a bottom while Western Europe heads into downtrend 13 Lower unemployment rates could foster easing of consolidation trend 13 2013 should be void of concerns about structural instability 14 Stock calls 15 Ricoh our top pick again in 2013; reiterating OUTPERFORM rating 15 Limited downside in Canon’s office-equipment business 15 Konica Minolta, Brother have strong long-term growth prospects but risks outside office equipment 15 Precision Sector 2 05 December 2012 Growing gap in US-Euro labor equipment ratios Regional differences in office environments reflect different speeds in consolidation, paperless trends When forecasting office-equipment demand, we focus on the labor equipment ratio. In the Gap in US-Euro labor US, this ratio has been declining since 2010, especially for single-function LBPs. In equipment ratios has Western Europe, however, it has held rather steady near peak levels. We believe the widened since 2010 owing cause of this rather clear divergence can be explained by regional differences in three to differences in 1) numbers factors: (1) the number of large companies, (2) changes in office environment caused by of large companies, 2) the use of tablet PCs (=paperless trend), and (3) color ratio in multi-function devices, speed of tablet PC diffusion, which could be a hub in office. 3) ratio of color MFPs in use Figure 2: US & Western European labor equipment ratio: Gap since 2010 Labor equipment ratio - Total office equipment 24.0% 22.0% 20.0% 18.0% 16.0% US Western Europe 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 1Q04 3Q04 1Q05 3Q05 1Q06 3Q06 1Q07 3Q07 1Q08 3Q08 1Q09 3Q09 1Q10 3Q10 1Q11 3Q11 1Q12 3Q12 Source: IDC, Census Bureau, Eurostat, Credit Suisse Calculation of labor equipment ratio The normal labor equipment ratio is calculated as tangible fixed assets divided by an average figure for employee numbers. In this report, however, our focus is limited to office equipment, which we define even more narrowly as printers and laser printers. We therefore calculate our labor equipment ratio as the number of machines in force (MIF) divided by the number of employees. According to this calculation, an labor equipment ratio of 20% means that 1 machine is being shared by, on average, five office workers. We calculate an approximate MIF figure using cumulative shipment numbers and assuming a replacement cycle of about five years. In the text and figures in this report, we use the following terms to refer to the various types of printers: copiers are copy machines, including multi-function copiers, which now are nearly 100% of the copier market; MFPs refer to multi-function laser printers; and LBPs refer to single-function laser printers. Precision Sector 3 05 December 2012 Figure 3: US office equipment pseudo-MIF trend Figure 4: Western Europe office equipment pseudo-MIF trend 35,000 (000) US office equipment MIF 45,000 (000) Western Europe office equipment MIF 30,000 40,000 35,000 25,000 30,000 20,000 25,000 15,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 5,000 5,000 0 0 1Q04 3Q04 1Q05 3Q05 1Q06 3Q06 1Q07 3Q07 1Q08 3Q08 1Q09 3Q09 1Q10 3Q10 1Q11 3Q11 1Q12 3Q12 1Q04 3Q04 1Q05 3Q05 1Q06 3Q06 1Q07 3Q07 1Q08 3Q08 1Q09 3Q09 1Q10 3Q10 1Q11 3Q11 1Q12 3Q12 B/W MFP Color LBP B/W MFP Color MFP B/W Copier Color Copier B/W LBP Color LBP B/W MFP Color MFP B/W Copier Color Copier Source: IDC, Credit Suisse Source: IDC, Credit Suisse Figure 5: Rest of World office equipment pseudo-MIF Figure 6: Worldwide office equipment pseudo-MIF trend trend 140,000 (000) Rest of World office equipment MIF 200,000 (000) WW office equipment MIF 180,000 120,000 160,000 100,000 140,000 80,000 120,000 100,000 60,000 80,000 40,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 20,000 0 0 1Q04 3Q04 1Q05 3Q05 1Q06 3Q06 1Q07 3Q07 1Q08 3Q08 1Q09 3Q09 1Q10 3Q10 1Q11 3Q11 1Q12 3Q12 1Q04 3Q04 1Q05 3Q05 1Q06 3Q06 1Q07 3Q07 1Q08 3Q08 1Q09 3Q09 1Q10 3Q10 1Q11 3Q11 1Q12 3Q12 B/W LBP Color LBP B/W MFP Color MFP B/W Copier Color Copier B/W MFP Color LBP B/W MFP Color MFP B/W Copier Color Copier Source: IDC, Credit Suisse Source: IDC, Credit Suisse US-Euro ratio gaps by printer type: Europe high for color multi-function devices, US ratio dragged down by decline in LBPs In Figure 2, we have graphed the US and Western Europe labor equipment ratios for all Through 2008: ratios rose printer types based on our approximations of the total employed workforces in the two on increasing information regions. The graph shows the ratios rose steadily in both regions through 2008, as offices volume increased the number of printers in an effort to improve efficiency amid sharply growing 2009: flattening trend as information volumes. Around 2009, however, the ratios in both the US and Europe leveled companies grew more cost- off at 22–23%, most likely because companies in both regions became more cost- conscious following Lehman conscious during the economic crisis following the Lehman Brothers’ collapse. The crisis uptrend for the overall rate thus flattened off. In Figures 7–12, we break down the overall labor equipment ratio into the ratios for each Ratios for color copiers, type of copier/printer. These graphs reveal that the ratios for color copiers, color MFPs and color MFPs, and B/W MFPs black & white (B/W) MFPs continue to rise, despite the maturing of the US and European continue to climb copier/printer markets. On the other hand, after ratios for B/W copiers declined early on, the ratios for color and B/W LBPs entered downturns from around 2010.
Recommended publications
  • Touch Panel Display
    Quick Setup Guide PA-TDU-001 Touch Panel Display Before using this printer, be sure to read this Quick Setup Guide. We suggest that you keep this manual in a handy place for future reference. Please visit us at http://support.brother.com/ where you can get product support and answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs). ENG Safety Precautions English Indicates a potentially hazardous situation which, if not avoided, WARNING could result in death or serious injuries. Keep out of the reach of children, particularly infants. Otherwise, injuries may result. Indicates a potentially hazardous situation which, if not avoided, IMPORTANT may result in damage to property or loss of product functionality. Place the printer on a stable surface, such as a level desk, before installing or removing the touch panel display. Press touch panel keys with the tip of your finger. Using a fingernail, mechanical pencil, screwdriver or any other sharp or hard object on the touch panel may damage it. Do not press touch panel keys with more force than necessary. Otherwise, damage may result. Be careful not to scrape or scratch the surface of the touch panel or display with a hard object. When moving the printer, do not carry it by the touch panel or the display. When installing the touch panel display onto the printer, do not allow the cord to be squashed. Otherwise, damage or malfunctions may result. Before opening the RD Roll compartment top cover, close the LCD. Do not drop the printer or subject it to strong shocks. Wipe any dust or dirt from the printer with a soft, dry cloth.
    [Show full text]
  • Published on July 21, 2021 1. Changes in Constituents 2
    Results of the Periodic Review and Component Stocks of Tokyo Stock Exchange Dividend Focus 100 Index (Effective July 30, 2021) Published on July 21, 2021 1. Changes in Constituents Addition(18) Deletion(18) CodeName Code Name 1414SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. 1801 TAISEI CORPORATION 2154BeNext-Yumeshin Group Co. 1802 OBAYASHI CORPORATION 3191JOYFUL HONDA CO.,LTD. 1812 KAJIMA CORPORATION 4452Kao Corporation 2502 Asahi Group Holdings,Ltd. 5401NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION 4004 Showa Denko K.K. 5713Sumitomo Metal Mining Co.,Ltd. 4183 Mitsui Chemicals,Inc. 5802Sumitomo Electric Industries,Ltd. 4204 Sekisui Chemical Co.,Ltd. 5851RYOBI LIMITED 4324 DENTSU GROUP INC. 6028TechnoPro Holdings,Inc. 4768 OTSUKA CORPORATION 6502TOSHIBA CORPORATION 4927 POLA ORBIS HOLDINGS INC. 6503Mitsubishi Electric Corporation 5105 Toyo Tire Corporation 6988NITTO DENKO CORPORATION 5301 TOKAI CARBON CO.,LTD. 7011Mitsubishi Heavy Industries,Ltd. 6269 MODEC,INC. 7202ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED 6448 BROTHER INDUSTRIES,LTD. 7267HONDA MOTOR CO.,LTD. 6501 Hitachi,Ltd. 7956PIGEON CORPORATION 7270 SUBARU CORPORATION 9062NIPPON EXPRESS CO.,LTD. 8015 TOYOTA TSUSHO CORPORATION 9101Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha 8473 SBI Holdings,Inc. 2.Dividend yield (estimated) 3.50% 3. Constituent Issues (sort by local code) No. local code name 1 1414 SHO-BOND Holdings Co.,Ltd. 2 1605 INPEX CORPORATION 3 1878 DAITO TRUST CONSTRUCTION CO.,LTD. 4 1911 Sumitomo Forestry Co.,Ltd. 5 1925 DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY CO.,LTD. 6 1954 Nippon Koei Co.,Ltd. 7 2154 BeNext-Yumeshin Group Co. 8 2503 Kirin Holdings Company,Limited 9 2579 Coca-Cola Bottlers Japan Holdings Inc. 10 2914 JAPAN TOBACCO INC. 11 3003 Hulic Co.,Ltd. 12 3105 Nisshinbo Holdings Inc. 13 3191 JOYFUL HONDA CO.,LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade-In Promotions Eligibility List Trade-In Promotions Eligibility List
    Xerox Trade-In Program Eligibility List Trade-In Promotions Eligibility List Trade-In Promotions Eligibility List Eligible trade-in products Manufacturer Page Brother 1 Canon 1 Dell 1 HP 2 IBM 3 Konica 3 Lexmark 3 Oki 4 Ricoh 4 Samsung 4 Sharp 4 Xerox 5 Trade-In Promotions Eligibility List Brother Product Name Brother 9040 Brother MFC-240C Brother MFC-9700 Brother 9450 Brother MFC-3240C Brother MFC-9840 Series Brother DCP-7020 Brother MFC-3820CN Brother MFC-9880CDW Brother DCP-7040 Brother MFC-7420 Brother HL-4040CN Brother MFC-7424 Brother HL-4070CDW Brother MFC-7820N Brother HL-4100CN Brother MFC-8460N Brother HL-4200CN Brother MFC-8480N Brother HL-5140 Brother MFC-8670DN Brother HL-5150 Series Brother MFC-8680N Brother HL-5170 Series Brother MFC-8840 Series Brother HL-5240 Brother MFC-8860DN Brother HL-5250 Series Brother MFC-8870DW Brother HL -5370 Series Brother MFC-9420CN Brother HL-6050 Series Brother MFC-9440CN M Canon Product Name Canon C1022 Canon imageCLASS D860 Canon imageCLASS MF8170C Canon C2110 Canon imageCLASS D880 Canon C5550 Canon imageCLASS MF4150 Canon D1180 Canon imageCLASS MF6530 Canon MF9150 Canon imageCLASS MF6540 Canon MF9170 Canon imageCLASS MF6550 Dell Product Name Dell Laser 1710N Dell 5100CN Series Dell M5200 Series Dell 1125 MFP Dell 5210N Dell W5300 Dell 1230C Dell 5310N Dell 1600 MFP Dell 5330DN Dell 1815 MFP Dell Laser 1320C Series Dell 2135 Dell Laser 2130CN Dell 2145 Dell Laser 3000CN Dell 2230D Dell Laser 3010CN Dell 2330D Dell Laser 3110CN Dell 2335 Series Dell Laser 3115CN Dell 3100CN Dell Laser 3130CN
    [Show full text]
  • Whither the Keiretsu, Japan's Business Networks? How Were They Structured? What Did They Do? Why Are They Gone?
    IRLE IRLE WORKING PAPER #188-09 September 2009 Whither the Keiretsu, Japan's Business Networks? How Were They Structured? What Did They Do? Why Are They Gone? James R. Lincoln, Masahiro Shimotani Cite as: James R. Lincoln, Masahiro Shimotani. (2009). “Whither the Keiretsu, Japan's Business Networks? How Were They Structured? What Did They Do? Why Are They Gone?” IRLE Working Paper No. 188-09. http://irle.berkeley.edu/workingpapers/188-09.pdf irle.berkeley.edu/workingpapers Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Working Paper Series (University of California, Berkeley) Year Paper iirwps-- Whither the Keiretsu, Japan’s Business Networks? How Were They Structured? What Did They Do? Why Are They Gone? James R. Lincoln Masahiro Shimotani University of California, Berkeley Fukui Prefectural University This paper is posted at the eScholarship Repository, University of California. http://repositories.cdlib.org/iir/iirwps/iirwps-188-09 Copyright c 2009 by the authors. WHITHER THE KEIRETSU, JAPAN’S BUSINESS NETWORKS? How were they structured? What did they do? Why are they gone? James R. Lincoln Walter A. Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 USA ([email protected]) Masahiro Shimotani Faculty of Economics Fukui Prefectural University Fukui City, Japan ([email protected]) 1 INTRODUCTION The title of this volume and the papers that fill it concern business “groups,” a term suggesting an identifiable collection of actors (here, firms) within a clear-cut boundary. The Japanese keiretsu have been described in similar terms, yet compared to business groups in other countries the postwar keiretsu warrant the “group” label least.
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 20, 2020 Tracking No
    Page 1 of 2 As of: 11/23/20 10:03 AM Received: November 18, 2020 Status: Posted PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: November 20, 2020 Tracking No. 1k4-9k60-8cjw Comments Due: December 03, 2020 Submission Type: Web Docket: PTO-C-2020-0055 Request for Comments on Discretion to Institute Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Comment On: PTO-C-2020-0055-0001 Discretion to Institute Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board Document: PTO-C-2020-0055-0452 Comment from Japan Business Machine and Information System Industries Association Submitter Information Name: Hideaki Chishima Address: Lila Hijirizaka 7FL 3-4-10, Mita Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 1080073 Email: [email protected] Phone: +81-3-6809-5495 Fax: +81-3-3451-1770 Submitter's Representative: Hideki Sanatake Organization: Japan Business Machine and Information System Industries Association General Comment Dear Sir, This post is for Japan Business Machine and Information System Industries Association (JBMIA) to submit its comments in response to solicitation of public comments by USPTO as announced in Federal Register / Docket No. PTO-C-2020-0055. The comments are attached hereto. JBMIA is a Japanese incorporated association which was renamed in 2002 from Japan Business Machine Makers Association established originally in 1960. JBMIA consists of 40 member companies engaged in business machine and information system and 5 supporting companies. Almost all of the member companies have actively filed patent applications in the USA. https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006484967b2a&format=xml&sho... 11/23/2020 Page 2 of 2 Sincerely, Hideaki Chishima (Mr) Intellectual Property Committee Secretariat Attachments JBMIA Comment (finnal) https://www.fdms.gov/fdms/getcontent?objectId=0900006484967b2a&format=xml&sho..
    [Show full text]
  • Published on 7 October 2016 1. Constituents Change the Result Of
    The result of periodic review and component stocks of TOPIX Composite 1500(effective 31 October 2016) Published on 7 October 2016 1. Constituents Change Addition( 70 ) Deletion( 60 ) Code Issue Code Issue 1810 MATSUI CONSTRUCTION CO.,LTD. 1868 Mitsui Home Co.,Ltd. 1972 SANKO METAL INDUSTRIAL CO.,LTD. 2196 ESCRIT INC. 2117 Nissin Sugar Co.,Ltd. 2198 IKK Inc. 2124 JAC Recruitment Co.,Ltd. 2418 TSUKADA GLOBAL HOLDINGS Inc. 2170 Link and Motivation Inc. 3079 DVx Inc. 2337 Ichigo Inc. 3093 Treasure Factory Co.,LTD. 2359 CORE CORPORATION 3194 KIRINDO HOLDINGS CO.,LTD. 2429 WORLD HOLDINGS CO.,LTD. 3205 DAIDOH LIMITED 2462 J-COM Holdings Co.,Ltd. 3667 enish,inc. 2485 TEAR Corporation 3834 ASAHI Net,Inc. 2492 Infomart Corporation 3946 TOMOKU CO.,LTD. 2915 KENKO Mayonnaise Co.,Ltd. 4221 Okura Industrial Co.,Ltd. 3179 Syuppin Co.,Ltd. 4238 Miraial Co.,Ltd. 3193 Torikizoku co.,ltd. 4331 TAKE AND GIVE. NEEDS Co.,Ltd. 3196 HOTLAND Co.,Ltd. 4406 New Japan Chemical Co.,Ltd. 3199 Watahan & Co.,Ltd. 4538 Fuso Pharmaceutical Industries,Ltd. 3244 Samty Co.,Ltd. 4550 Nissui Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd. 3250 A.D.Works Co.,Ltd. 4636 T&K TOKA CO.,LTD. 3543 KOMEDA Holdings Co.,Ltd. 4651 SANIX INCORPORATED 3636 Mitsubishi Research Institute,Inc. 4809 Paraca Inc. 3654 HITO-Communications,Inc. 5204 ISHIZUKA GLASS CO.,LTD. 3666 TECNOS JAPAN INCORPORATED 5998 Advanex Inc. 3678 MEDIA DO Co.,Ltd. 6203 Howa Machinery,Ltd. 3688 VOYAGE GROUP,INC. 6319 SNT CORPORATION 3694 OPTiM CORPORATION 6362 Ishii Iron Works Co.,Ltd. 3724 VeriServe Corporation 6373 DAIDO KOGYO CO.,LTD. 3765 GungHo Online Entertainment,Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Brother International Corporation Continues to Deliver Innovation to Businesses of All Sizes with Next‐Generation Color Laser Printers and All‐In‐Ones
    Brother International Corporation Continues to Deliver Innovation to Businesses of All Sizes with Next‐Generation Color Laser Printers and All‐in‐Ones New devices offer enterprise‐level security along with workgroup productivity solutions and low total cost of ownership (TCO) BRIDGEWATER, N.J., March 15, 2017 — Building upon its reputation as a leading provider of business‐ class document imaging technology and solutions, Brother International Corporation today introduced its expanded line of color laser printers and All‐in‐Ones. These devices have been specifically designed to address critical business challenges faced by organizations of all sizes especially improving business workflow efficiency and enhancing document security. This new series of devices provides enterprise‐ level security, helping to ensure that confidential documents are only accessed by intended recipients and restricting unauthorized parties from accessing specific printer functions, such as color printing to help control printing costs. The new color laser devices deliver enhanced high impact, vivid color and sharp black and white documents along with fast printing and best in class scanning speeds up to 52 images per minute (ipm) simplex and up to 104ipm duplex1, along with advanced features to help business users increase productivity. The devices are optimized for today’s mobile workforce and include access to popular business cloud services2 and NFC connectivity3 for mobile device printing and greater security. “This new color series offers the capabilities
    [Show full text]
  • Portfolio of Investments
    PORTFOLIO OF INVESTMENTS CTIVP® – Lazard International Equity Advantage Fund, March 31, 2020 (Unaudited) (Percentages represent value of investments compared to net assets) Investments in securities Common Stocks 96.4% Common Stocks (continued) Issuer Shares Value ($) Issuer Shares Value ($) Australia 6.4% Legrand SA 131,321 8,375,908 AGL Energy Ltd. 880,686 9,216,678 L’Oreal SA 104,607 27,073,419 Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. 728,775 9,443,206 Orange SA 949,535 11,496,452 ASX Ltd. 162,820 7,642,885 Peugeot SA 1,014,598 13,209,331 BHP Group Ltd. 471,264 8,549,345 Schneider Electric SE 553,434 46,777,833 CIMIC Group Ltd. 332,784 4,713,315 STMicroelectronics NV 400,446 8,608,225 CSL Ltd. 166,037 30,097,798 Total SA 1,095,152 41,264,011 Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. 4,669,354 28,614,857 Total 209,274,345 (a),(b) IDP Education Ltd. 447,152 3,487,548 Germany 4.2% Inghams Group Ltd. 1,200,179 2,405,115 Adidas AG 22,586 5,014,708 Magellan Financial Group Ltd. 729,823 19,356,167 Allianz SE, Registered Shares 319,746 54,451,936 Regis Resources Ltd. 1,318,187 2,929,557 Continental AG 32,324 2,304,645 Santos Ltd. 4,606,425 9,460,470 Dialog Semiconductor PLC(c) 82,878 2,154,248 (c) Saracen Mineral Holdings Ltd. 3,513,246 7,900,242 Hugo Boss AG 273,602 6,848,821 Technology One Ltd. 897,813 4,336,750 MTU Aero Engines AG 74,698 10,801,095 Total 148,153,933 SAP SE 91,344 10,198,367 Austria 0.2% Siemens Healthineers AG 179,517 6,939,504 OMV AG 81,189 2,221,890 Total 98,713,324 Raiffeisen Bank International AG 111,223 1,599,856 Hong Kong 3.9% Total 3,821,746 CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 June 30 Japan IFRS Adoption Data From
    Analysis of Disclosure in “Basic Policy Regarding Selection of Accounting Standards” Tokyo Stock Exchange, Inc. 1 I. Background Jun. 24, 2014 Japan Revitalization Strategy (Revised in 2014) 4) Promoting of an increase in the number of companies voluntarily adopting IFRS Tokyo Stock Exchange will encourage listed companies to explain to investors their basic views on the selection of accounting standards (for example, whether they are considering adopting IFRS). Nov. 11, 2014 Revision of Guidelines for Financial Results Request description on “Basic Policy Regarding Selection of Accounting Standards” in Financial Results <Guidelines for Financial Results> ・Please describe basic policy regarding selection of accounting standards. ・For example, whether you are considering the adoption of IFRS. (stage of consideration, scheduled adoption date) Adoption from Financial Results for FY-ended Mar. 31, 2015 (early adoption possible) Jun. 30, 2015 Japan Revitalization Strategy (Revised in 2015) 4) Further promotion of an increase in the number of companies voluntarily adopting IFRS Listed companies disclose their progress in considering the adoption of IFRS in “Basic Policy Regarding Selection of Accounting Standards” of the financial results. The government will analyze this together with Tokyo Stock Exchange and disseminate the state of IFRS adoption to contribute to efforts among listed companies to consider transitioning to IFRS. 2 II. Scope of Analysis Coverage:3,537 companies Basic Policy Regarding Selection of Accounting Standards (hereinafter ”Basic Policy”) of financial results that have been described by TSE-listed companies FY ended April 2016 ~ FY ended December 2016 : 928 companies FY ended January 2017 ~ FY ended February 2017 : 251 companies FY ended March 2017 (include irregular accounting period) : 2,358 companies 3 Ⅲ.
    [Show full text]
  • NIKKEI JAPAN 1000 Constituents (As of March 25, 2005)
    NIKKEI JAPAN 1000 Constituents (as of March 25, 2005) Tokyo Stock Exchange 1st 2580 COCA-COLA CENTRAL JAPAN 1332 NIPPON SUISAN 2590 DYDO DRINCO 1334 MARUHA GROUP 2591 CALPIS 1377 SAKATA SEED 2593 ITO EN 1379 HOKUTO 2594 KEY COFFEE 1601 TEIKOKU OIL 2595 KIRIN BEVERAGE 1662 JAPAN PETROLEUM EXPLORATION 2602 NISSHIN OILLIO GROUP 1720 TOKYU CONSTRUCTION 2607 FUJI OIL 1721 COMSYS HOLDINGS 2613 J-OIL MILLS 1722 MISAWA HOMES HOLDINGS 2651 LAWSON 1801 TAISEI 2664 CAWACHI 1802 OBAYASHI 2670 ABC-MART 1803 SHIMIZU 2678 ASKUL 1808 HASEKO 2681 GEO 1812 KAJIMA 2685 POINT 1820 NISHIMATSU CONSTRUCTION 2692 ITOCHU-SHOKUHIN 1821 SUMITOMO MITSUI CONSTRUCTION 2730 EDION 1824 MAEDA 2731 NIWS 1833 OKUMURA 2768 SOJITZ HOLDINGS 1860 TODA 2779 MITSUKOSHI 1878 DAITO TRUST CONSTRUCTION 2784 ALFRESA HOLDINGS 1881 NIPPO 2801 KIKKOMAN 1883 MAEDA ROAD CONSTRUCTION 2802 AJINOMOTO 1885 TOA 2809 Q.P. 1893 PENTA-OCEAN CONSTRUCTION 2810 HOUSE FOODS 1924 PANAHOME 2811 KAGOME 1925 DAIWA HOUSE INDUSTRY 2815 ARIAKE JAPAN 1928 SEKISUI HOUSE 2871 NICHIREI 1941 CHUDENKO 2873 KATOKICHI 1942 KANDENKO 2874 YOKOHAMA REITO 1946 TOENEC 2875 TOYO SUISAN 1951 KYOWA EXEO 2897 NISSIN FOOD PRODUCTS 1959 KYUDENKO 2908 FUJICCO 1961 SANKI ENGINEERING 2914 JAPAN TOBACCO 1963 JGC 3001 KATAKURA INDUSTRIES 1969 TAKASAGO THERMAL ENGINEERING 3002 GUNZE 1970 HITACHI PLANT ENGINEERING 3101 TOYOBO 1973 NEC SYS. INTEGRA. & CONST. 3103 UNITIKA 1979 TAIKISHA 3105 NISSHINBO INDUSTRIES 1982 HIBIYA ENGINEERING 3106 KURABO INDUSTRIES 2001 NIPPON FLOUR MILLS 3110 NITTO BOSEKI 2002 NISSHIN SEIFUN GROUP 3116 TOYOTA
    [Show full text]
  • Bas-311H Instruction Manual
    BAS-311H INSTRUCTION MANUAL Please read this manual before using the machine. Please keep this manual within easy reach for quick reference. DIRECT DRIVE PROGRAMMABLE ELECTRONIC PATTERN SEWER Thank you very much for buying a BROTHER sewing machine. Before using your new machine, please read the safety instructions below and the explanations given in the instruction manual. With industrial sewing machines, it is normal to carry out work while positioned directly in front of moving parts such as the needle and thread take-up lever, and consequently there is always a danger of injury that can be caused by these parts. Follow the instructions from training personnel and instructors regarding safe and correct operation before operating the machine so that you will know how to use it correctly. BAS-311H SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS [1] Safety indications and their meanings This instruction manual and the indications and symbols that are used on the machine itself are provided in order to ensure safe operation of this machine and to prevent accidents and injury to yourself or other people. The meanings of these indications and symbols are given below. Indications The instructions which follow this term indicate situations where failure to follow the DANGER instructions will result in death or serious injury. The instructions which follow this term indicate situations where failure to follow the WARNING instructions could result in death or serious injury. The instructions which follow this term indicate situations where failure to follow the CAUTION instructions may result in minor or moderate injury. Symbols ・・・・・・ This symbol ( ) indicates something that you should be careful of.
    [Show full text]
  • Brother Communication Report
    Editorial Policy “Brother Communication Report 2020” aims at reaching more stakeholders to Communication Report 2020 Brother provide them with accurate information about the sustainability of the Brother Group’s business activities. Brother Communication Report 2020 15-1 Naeshiro-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8561, Japan URL: https://global.brother Published in July 2020 2020 BROTHER INDUSTRIES, LTD. All Rights Reserved. “At your side.” story Corporate Message Foundation of All Global Operations With the “At your side.” spirit in mind, The Brother Group Global Charter the Brother Group is creating new value The Brother Group Global Charter (“Global Charter”) is the foundation of all global operations of the Brother Group. It consists of the Basic Policies and Codes of Practice that guide and govern the daily decision making and actions of Group companies and employees. The Brother Group responds to the needs of customers with its “At your side.” spirit in mind, always placing its customers first. It also creates new value by passing down the DNA of Brother, confidently taking on challenges and adapting Full text of the Brother Group Global Charter https://global.brother/en/corporate/principle to changing times and environments. Sharing the Global Charter with employees in more than 40 countries and regions Contents 01 “At your side.” story 29 Activities Supporting Value Creation 01 Corporate Message 30 Product Development Each employee of the Brother Group adopts the Global Charter as the foundation of daily decision making and actions, and 02 Foundation of All Global Operations 31 Technical Capabilities promptly provides all stakeholders with the value they require to 03 Spirit of Foundation 32 Talent Development ensure Brother remains a trusted company.
    [Show full text]