DOCSLIB.ORG

Household Waste Characterisation Campaign Final Report November 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Household Waste Characterisation Campaign Final Report November 2018 Household Waste Characterisation Campaign Final Report November 2018 Characterisation of Municipal Waste Final Report Document Control Sheet Client: EPA Project Title: Municipal Waste Characterisation Document Title: Household Waste Campaign ‐ Final Report Document No: Rp0006 Text Pages: 39 Appendices: 10 Current Revision: F01 Rev. Status Date Author(s) Reviewed By Approved By CMcG F01 Approval 26nd Nov. 2018 CMcG OG / OG Copyright RPS Group Limited. All rights reserved. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client and unless otherwise agreed in writing by RPS Group Limited no other party may use, make use of or rely on the contents of this report. The report has been compiled using the resources agreed with the client and in accordance with the scope of work agreed with the client. No liability is accepted by RPS Group Limited for any use of this report, other than the purpose for which it was prepared. RPS Group Limited accepts no responsibility for any documents or information supplied to RPS Group Limited by others and no legal liability arising from the use by others of opinions or data contained in this report. It is expressly stated that no independent verification of any documents or information supplied by others has been made. RPS Group Limited has used reasonable skill, care and diligence in compiling this report and no warranty is provided as to the report’s accuracy. No part of this report may be copied or reproduced, by any means, without the written permission of RPS Group Limited Municipal Waste Characterisation ‐ Household Waste Campaign ‐ Final Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................. V GLOSSARY OF TERMS .................................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ VIII 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 2 MIXED RESIDUAL WASTE ................................................................................................... 2 2.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ........................................................................................................... 2 2.2 SAMPLING PROGRAMME ................................................................................................................. 2 2.3 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4.1 Materials Placed Incorrectly in the MRW Bin ................................................................... 5 2.4.2 Packaging Waste ............................................................................................................... 6 2.4.3 Biodegradable Waste ........................................................................................................ 6 2.4.4 Main Changes 2008‐2018 .................................................................................................. 7 3 MIXED DRY RECYCLABLES ................................................................................................. 10 3.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................................................................................... 10 3.2 SAMPLING PROGRAMME ............................................................................................................... 11 3.3 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 13 3.4.1 Non Target Materials....................................................................................................... 13 3.4.2 Packaging Waste ............................................................................................................. 13 3.4.3 Biodegradable Waste ...................................................................................................... 14 3.4.4 Main Changes 2008‐2018 ................................................................................................ 14 4 ORGANIC WASTE .............................................................................................................. 17 4.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................................................................................... 17 4.2 SAMPLING PROGRAMME ............................................................................................................... 18 4.3 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 18 4.4 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 20 4.4.1 Non‐target Materials ....................................................................................................... 20 4.4.2 Packaging Waste ............................................................................................................. 20 4.4.3 Biodegradable Waste ...................................................................................................... 21 4.4.4 Main Changes 2008‐2018 ................................................................................................ 21 5 CONTAMINATION ............................................................................................................. 25 5.1 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 25 5.2 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 28 Rp0006F01Rp0006F01 i Municipal Waste Characterisation ‐ Household Waste Campaign ‐ Final Report 6 NATIONAL PROFILE ........................................................................................................... 31 6.1 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 31 6.2 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 33 6.2.1 National Composition Profile for Kerbside Collected Household Waste ........................ 33 6.2.2 Packaging Waste ............................................................................................................. 33 6.2.3 Biodegradable Waste ...................................................................................................... 35 6.2.4 Main Changes 2008‐2018 ................................................................................................ 35 7 COMMENTARY ON THE METHODOLOGY ........................................................................... 37 APPENDICES Appendix A Waste Categories Appendix B Sampling Methodology Appendix C Initial Sampling Plan February 2017 Appendix D Updated Sampling Plan September 2017 Appendix E Sampling Procedure Appendix F Comparison Samples Collected with Sample Required Appendix G Results Mixed Residual Waste Appendix H Results Mixed Dry Recyclables Appendix I Results Organic Waste Appendix J National Profile Details Rp0006F01Rp0006F01 ii Municipal Waste Characterisation ‐ Household Waste Campaign ‐ Final Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1 ‐ Composition of Kerbside Collected Household MRW ......................................................... 4 Figure 2.2 ‐ Packaging in Kerbside Collected Household MRW .............................................................. 6 Figure 2.3 – Kerbside Collected Household MRW Composition ‐ Change 2008‐2018 ........................... 7 Figure 2.4 – Kerbside Collected Household MRW Target, Packaging & Biodegradable Waste Content Change 2008‐2018 .................................................................................................................................. 8 Figure 3.1 ‐ Composition of Kerbside Collected Household MDR ........................................................ 12 Figure 3.2 ‐ Packaging in Kerbside Collected Household MDR ............................................................. 13 Figure 3.3 – Kerbside Collected Household MDR Composition ‐ Change 2008‐2018 .......................... 14 Figure 3.4 ‐ Kerbside Collected Household MDR Non‐Target, Packaging & Biodegradable Waste Content change 2008‐2018 ................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 4.1 ‐ Composition of Kerbside Collected Household Organic Waste ......................................... 19 Figure 4.2 ‐ Packaging in Kerbside Collected Household Organic Waste ............................................. 21 Figure 4.3 – Kerbside Collected Household Organic Waste Composition ‐ Change 2008‐2018 ........... 22 Figure 4.4 – Kerbside Collected Household Organic Waste, Non‐Target, Packaging & Biodegradable Waste Content 2008‐2018 ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Characterisation, Recovery and Recycling Potential of Solid Waste in a University of a Developing Economy
    sustainability Article Characterisation, Recovery and Recycling Potential of Solid Waste in a University of a Developing Economy Oluwatobi Owojori 1,* , Joshua N. Edokpayi 2 , Ratshalingwa Mulaudzi 1 and John O. Odiyo 2 1 Department of Ecology and Resources Management, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa; [email protected] 2 Department of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Venda, Thohoyandou 0950, South Africa; [email protected] (J.N.E.); [email protected] (J.O.O.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +27-658432663 Received: 24 May 2020; Accepted: 18 June 2020; Published: 23 June 2020 Abstract: The present decade of Sustainable Development Goals has influenced higher educational institutions to assess and harness their great potential for waste diversion, recovery, and recycling. Institutional solid waste management in South Africa as a developing economy is yet to receive the required attention compared to developed countries. The measurement of the characteristics, and composition of solid waste is a fundamental pre-requisite towards creating a sustainable and viable process of solid waste management systems across institutions as this provides adequate and reliable information on the waste generated. This study aimed to determine the variations of waste components in the University of Venda (UNIVEN) by characterisation of the waste generated. Solid waste samples were collected from key activity areas and characterised using the ASTM D5321-92 method for unprocessed municipal solid waste. The recyclable, compostable, and non-recoverable components of the waste generated were found to be 61.7%, 34.4%, and 3.9%, respectively. The results of the waste audit revealed a strong potential for recycling in the institution (61.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • 913 11 Treatment of Waste for Landfill
    30/1/2020 on withdrawn was Treatmentdocument of waste for landfill Report – GEHO1111BVDF-E-E This 913_11, Version 2 Treatment of waste for landfill Version 2 Page 1 of 52 November 2011 We are the Environment Agency. We protect and improve the environment and make it a better place for people and wildlife. We operate at the place where environmental change has its greatest impact on people’s lives. We reduce the risks to people and properties from flooding; make sure there is enough water for people and wildlife; protect and improve air, land and water quality and apply the environmental standards within which industry can operate. Acting to reduce climate change and helping people and wildlife adapt to its consequences are at the heart of all that we do. We cannot do this alone. We work closely with a wide range of partners including government, business, local authorities, other agencies, civil society groups and the communities we serve. 30/1/2020 on Published by: Further copies of this report are available Environment Agency Horizon house, Deanery Road withdrawnfrom our publications catalogue: http://publications.environment- Bristol BS1 5AH Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk or our National Customer agency.gov.uk Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 www.environment-agency.gov.uk was Email: enquiries@environment- agency.gov.uk. © Environment Agency 2011 All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. February 2007 amended November 2011 document This Treatment of waste for landfill Version 2 Page 2 of 52 November 2011 Overview All waste must be treated before it can be landfilled, with a few exceptions.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization and Use of Char Produced from Pyrolysis of Post-Consumer Mixed Plastic Waste
    water Article Characterization and Use of Char Produced from Pyrolysis of Post-Consumer Mixed Plastic Waste M. A. Martín-Lara * , A. Piñar, A. Ligero, G. Blázquez and M. Calero * Chemical Engineering Department, University of Granada, Avda. Fuentenueva, 18071 Granada, Spain; [email protected] (A.P.); [email protected] (A.L.); [email protected] (G.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.A.M.-L.); [email protected] (M.C.); Tel.: +34958240445 (M.A.M.-L.); +34958243315 (M.C.) Abstract: In this work, the pyrolysis of post-consumer mixed plastic waste (polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene film (PE)) is carried out. The solid product of the pyrolysis is characterized and tested for its use as adsorbent of lead present in aqueous media. The pyrolysis temperature has a great influence on the solid product yield, decreasing when the temperature in- creases. The highest yield to solid product obtained is from the pyrolysis of film at lower temperature (450 ◦C), reaching almost 14%. The results of product solid characterization reveal that the carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen content decreases with increasing pyrolysis temperature. Furthermore, both the ash and the volatile content are related to the pyrolysis temperature. The ash content is higher when the pyrolysis temperature is higher, while when the temperature increases, a solid product with lower volatile content is obtained. In respect to specific surface area, a higher pyrolysis temperature improves the properties of the solid product as an adsorbent. The adsorption capacity increases as the pyrolysis temperature increases, with the highest value of 7.91 mg/g for the solid obtained in the pyrolysis at 550 ◦C.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning Waste Into Resources Rethinking the Way We Discard Things
    THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF LICENTIATE OF ENGINEERING Turning Waste into Resources Rethinking the way we discard things Isabel Ordoñez Pizarro Department of Product and Production Development Division Design & Human Factors CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gothenburg, Sweden 2014 Turning waste into resources: Rethinking the way we discard things Isabel Ordoñez Pizarro Report no 87 ISSN 1652-9243 Published and distributed by Department of Product and Production Development Division Design & Human Factors Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96, Gothenburg, Sweden Telephone +46 (0)31-772 1000 Cover: Household waste covered in the sample of the waste characterisation Study. Image taken by Abhilash Ram or Sara Berner on 13 February 2013. Printed by Chalmers Reproservice Gothenburg, Sweden 2014 Abstract Waste is one of the biggest challenges faced by our society. If not handled correctly, waste pollutes our natural environment with devastating results. However, it seems almost unavoidable that our society generates waste. Cyclical material use models have been proposed as a more sustainable alternative to our linear take-make-waste production culture. The aim of this licentiate thesis has been to investigate how to recover the material resources that today cannot go back into production, helping to redefine waste as a resource. In order to do that this work first defines a framework to address material flow through society followed by a general background on waste and waste management. The main body of the licentiate describes three studies performed by the author in order explore the topic addressed. The studies investigated (A) how design and waste management collaborate, (B) how to facilitate designing with difficult waste and (C) how the waste system interface can be designed to facilitate resource recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • Physico-Chemical Properties of Excavated Plastic from Landfill Mining and Current Recycling Routes L. Canopoli1, B. Fidalgo1, F
    Physico-chemical properties of excavated plastic from landfill mining and current recycling routes L. Canopoli1, B. Fidalgo1, F. Coulon1, S.T. Wagland1* 1School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 0AL, UK * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: In Europe over 5.25 billion tonnes of waste has been landfilled between 1995 and 2015. Among this large amount of waste, plastic represents typically 5-25 wt % which is significant and has the potential to be recycled and reintroduced into the circular economy. To date there is still however little information available of the opportunities and challenges in recovering plastics from landfill sites. In this review, the impacts of landfill chemistry on the degradation and/or contamination of excavated plastic waste are analysed. The feasibility of using excavated plastic waste as feedstock for upcycling to valuable chemicals or liquid fuels through thermochemical conversion is also critically discussed. The limited degradation that is experienced by many plastics in landfills (> 20 years) which guarantee that large amount is still available is largely due to thermooxidative degradation and the anaerobic conditions. However, excavated plastic waste cannot be conventionally recycled due to high level of ash, impurities and heavy metals. Recent studies demonstrated that pyrolysis offers a cost effective alternative option to conventional recycling. The produced pyrolysis oil is expected to have similar characteristics to petroleum diesel oil. The production of valuable product 1 from excavated plastic waste will also increase the feasibility of enhanced landfill mining projects. However, further studies are needed to investigate the uncertainties about the contamination level and degradation of excavated plastic waste and address their viability for being processed through pyrolysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Waste-To-Energy Potential of Domestic Solid Wastes in Benin Metropolis, Nigeria
    Dec. JASEM ISSN 1119 -8362 Full-text Available Online at J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. 2016 All rights reserved Vol. 20 (4) 1089-1092 www.ajol.info and www.bioline.org.br/ja Evaluation of Waste-to-Energy Potential of Domestic Solid Wastes in Benin Metropolis, Nigeria *1IGBINOMWANHIA, DI; OBANOR, AI; OLISA, YP; AKHATOR, PE 1 Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria 2 and 4 Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria 3Mechanical Engineering Department, Niger Delta University, Amassoma, Nigeria Corresponding author: Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The solid waste crisis in the fast urbanizing Benin metropolis is the result of inability of the local government authorities to effectively handle the huge amount of waste generated daily. A large percentage of the solid waste in the metropolis ends up on illegal waste dumpsites. The aim of this paper was to investigate the waste-to-energy potentials of domestic solid wastes in Benin metropolis, Nigeria using a three-phase study plan - study of current waste management activities, characterization of domestic solid waste and determination of the waste-to-energy potentials of domestic solid waste. The results obtained reveal that about 13.18% of combustible solid waste is generated in Benin metropolis with average calorific value (CV) of 20,198.89 kJ/kg producing an energy value of 36.95 MW/day. © JASEM http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v20i4.23 Key Words : Characterisation, Waste-to-Energy Potentials, Domestic Solid Waste, Benin Metropolis The fourth schedule of the constitution of the Federal solid waste management.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of Municipal Solid Waste Composition Into Model Inputs
    CHARACTERISATION OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE COMPOSITION INTO MODEL INPUTS J. LAMBORN Faculty of Engineering and Industrial Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia Email: [email protected] SUMMARY: Landfill gas generation models require the conversion of waste composition data into model inputs. Waste composition data is usually collected in the form of waste fractions: green waste, food, plastics, metals, paper, inert etc. These waste fractions need to be characterised into cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin and inert; for inputs into models. This paper analyses the work that has been done on this characterisation and identifies where future work could be undertaken to help with the conversion of waste composition data into model inputs. 1. INTRODUCTION A landfill gas generation model is a tool that provides an estimation of generated methane or total landfill gas volume over time from a particular volume of waste. The purpose of a model is to describe (in simple terms) the complex changes during decomposition of waste in a landfill. For a model to accurately reflect the processes within a landfill, it must take into account the complex nature of the microbiological decomposition of waste within a landfill, the nature of the landfill itself, the chemical reactions and the ability of gases and liquids to move through the landfill. These types of models are known as component models and are the next generation of landfill models. The leading component models are LDAT (University of Southampton, UK), POSE (Technical University Braunshweig, Germany), HBM (Napier University, UK) and MODUELO (University of Cantabria, Spain). These models were all compared as part of the Hydro-Physico-Mechanics 2 (HPM2) Challenge to landfill modellers in 2007 (Ivanova, Richards et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Waste Management Practices: a Review
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Efficient waste management practices: A review Halkos, George and Petrou, Kleoniki Natalia Department of Economics, University of Thessaly 21 May 2016 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/71518/ MPRA Paper No. 71518, posted 22 May 2016 14:50 UTC Efficient waste management practices: A review George Halkos and Kleoniki Natalia Petrou Laboratory of Operations Research, Department of Economics, University of Thessaly Abstract Nowadays waste has become a vital part of our economy, as a by-product of economic activity. It originates from businesses, the government and households and following appropriate management techniques, it can be used as an input to economic activity for instance through material or energy recovery. Waste is produced by all activities and although it is a locally arising problem it has both local and global effects. Societies need to dispose their waste products creating a source of environmental pollution. Sustainable waste management requires the combination of skills and knowledge of physical sciences and engineering together with economics, ecology, human behaviour, entrepreneurship and good governance. This paper discusses extensively the policy framework and the legislative background around waste and its management in the EU and worldwide. In this way, it focuses on the treatment options for waste under the Circular Economy approach having in mind the idea of closing the loop and hence achieving a more efficient use of resources. Keywords: Municipal solid waste; waste management; resources; circular economy; waste infrastructure. JEL Codes: O13; O52; Q50; Q53; Q56; R11. 1 1. Introduction Nowadays waste has become a vital part of our economy, being a by-product of economic activity and originating from businesses, the government and households; at the same time it can be used as an input to economic activity for instance through material or energy recovery (Defra, 2011a).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Municipal Solid Waste Management Planning in Small Island Developing States in the Pacific Region
    REFERENCE LIBRARY Document Cover Page Guidelines for municipal solid waste management planning in small island developing states in the Pacific region. – Apia, Samoa : SPREP, 1999. This electronic document is included as a resource. If you use or quote this reference please acknowledge and give credit to the original authors. Document starts on the next page. SPREP Waigani Convention Handbook SPREP South Pacific Regional Environment Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme Guidelines for Municipal Solid Waste Management Planning in Small Island Developing States in the Pacific Region SPREP Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Guidelines for municipal solid waste management planning in small island developing states in the Pacific region. – Apia, Samoa : SPREP, 1999. ix, 74 p. : tables ; 29 cm. ISBN: 982-04-0200-X 1.Factory and trade waste – Oceania. 2.Refuse and refuse disposal – Oceania. I. South Pacific Regional Environment Programme. II. Title. 363.7285 Published in June1999 by the South Pacific Regional Environment Programme PO Box 240 Apia, Samoa Email: [email protected] Web site: http://www.sprep.org.ws/ Produced by SPREP’s Waste Management, Pollution Prevention and Emergencies Programme with assistance from UNEP Edited and Computer layout by SPREP’s Publication Unit Cover design by SPREP’s Publication Unit Typeset in 11/13 Garamond for body text and Helvetica for titles Printed on recycled paper 90gsm Savannah Matt Art (60%) by Quality Print Ltd Suva, Fiji © South Pacific Regional Environment Programme, 1999. The South Pacific Regional Environment Programme authorises the reproduction of this material, whole or in part, in any form provided appropriate acknowledgement is given.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Waste Characterisation
    Holger Ecke, Anders Bergman & Anders Lagerkvist 2 WASTE CHARACTERISATION 2.1 Summary This chapter gives an introduction to the methodology for waste characterisation. Emphasis is placed on investigations including physical, chemical and biological analyses, leaching tests and landfill simulations. Basic methods to evaluate and present the collected data are outlined by means of examples. 2.2 Introduction Wastes can have different characteristics. The management of a particular waste must be adapted to its characteristics, in order to get a desired landfill function. Landfill technology, landfill siting and choices of recipients are affected by the waste’s properties. Waste characterisation is mostly used in order to assess future environmental impacts from the disposal of waste. The concept pollution potential has a great importance in the analysis of risks. It is a measure of the waste’s ability to pollute the environment. Factors that affect the pollution potential are primarily the concentration gradients between the waste and its environment and the mobilisation rates of pollutants under various conditions. The pollution potential of a waste decreases through certain processes, e.g. by degradation, complex formation and emissions. The landfill is stabilised with regard to its setting, when emissions approach the background fluxes of the site. Waste properties are systematically documented through characterisation. The properties can be independent of the surroundings, but they can also depend on the interaction between waste and its environment. The result of a characterisation is a simplified description of the real waste behaviour, which can be used to choose landfill strategy and technical solutions. Characterisation of waste poses several difficulties.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of Domestic Solid Waste for the Determination of Waste Management Option in Amassoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria
    JASEM ISSN 1119-8362 Full-text Available Online at J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. June 2014 JOURNAL OF APPLIED SCIENCE AND ENVIRONVol.ME N18T (A2)L 2M11A-215NA GEMENT. All rights reserved www.ajol.info and www.bioline.org.br/ja Characterisation of Domestic Solid Waste for the Determination of Waste Management Option in Amassoma, Bayelsa State, Nigeria 1 2 3 * DI; IGBINOMWANHIA; AI.; OBANOR; YP; OLISA 1, 2Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria 3Mechanical Engineering Department, Niger Delta University, Amassoma, Nigeria KEY WORDS: Solid waste generation, Classes of waste, Quantity generated, Method of management ABSTRACT: The work reported in this paper involves the characterization of residential solid waste in Amassoma for the determination of household solid waste management option in Amassoma, Bayelsa state in Nigeria. A site-specific study was carried out in order to determine the components and estimate the quantity of residential solid waste generation in the town. Structured questionnaires were applied to collect primary information such as size of households, educational level, monthly income etc. from households. The results from the study was then applied to determine the waste management option for residential waste in Amassoma town The results obtained revealed that the total solid waste generated in Amassoma is 1115.2kg/day from domestic activities. Furthermore, analysis of the sample collected showed that 51.34% of compostable waste (garbage) is generated, 33.62% of combustible waste and 15.04% of incombustible waste is generated in Ammasoma. The study also showed that dumpsite is the current waste disposal option in Amassoma. As Amssoma is a riverine area, the use of landfill for the purpose of solid waste disposal is not a good option because it can lead to eutrophication.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Review of Real-Time Methods for Solid Waste Characterisation: Informing
    1 Critical review of real-time methods for solid waste characterisation: informing 2 material recovery and fuel production 3 4 C. Vrancken1, P.J. Longhurst1, S.T. Wagland1* 5 1School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield, Bedfordshire, MK43 6 0AL, UK 7 8 * Corresponding author: [email protected] 9 1 10 Abstract: Waste management processes generally represent a significant loss of material, energy and 11 economic resources, so legislation and financial incentives are being implemented to improve the 12 recovery of these valuable resources whilst reducing contamination levels. Material recovery and 13 waste derived fuels are potentially valuable options being pursued by industry, using mechanical and 14 biological processes incorporating sensor and sorting technologies developed and optimised for 15 recycling plants. In its current state, waste management presents similarities to other industries that 16 could improve their efficiencies using process analytical technology tools. Existing sensor 17 technologies could be used to measure critical waste characteristics, providing data required by 18 existing legislation, potentially aiding waste treatment processes and assisting stakeholders in decision 19 making. Optical technologies offer the most flexible solution to gather real-time information 20 applicable to each of the waste mechanical and biological treatment processes used by industry. In 21 particular, combinations of optical sensors in the visible and the near-infrared range from 800 nm to 22 2500 nm of the spectrum, and different mathematical techniques, are able to provide material 23 information and fuel properties with typical performance levels between 80% and 90%. These sensors 24 not only could be used to aid waste processes, but to provide most waste quality indicators required 25 by existing legislation, whilst offering better tools to the stakeholders.
    [Show full text]