DOCSLIB.ORG

Properties of Synaptic Transmission from Rods and Cones in the Outer Plexiform Layer of the Vertebrate Retina

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Properties of Synaptic Transmission from Rods and Cones in the Outer Plexiform Layer of the Vertebrate Retina University of Nebraska Medical Center DigitalCommons@UNMC Theses & Dissertations Graduate Studies Summer 8-17-2018 Properties of Synaptic Transmission from Rods and Cones in The Outer Plexiform Layer of The Vertebrate Retina Xiangyi Wen University of Nebraska Medical Center Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/etd Part of the Neurosciences Commons Recommended Citation Wen, Xiangyi, "Properties of Synaptic Transmission from Rods and Cones in The Outer Plexiform Layer of The Vertebrate Retina" (2018). Theses & Dissertations. 290. https://digitalcommons.unmc.edu/etd/290 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@UNMC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNMC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PROPERTIES OF SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION FROM RODS AND CONES IN THE OUTER PLEXIFORM LAYER OF THE VERTEBRATE RETINA by Xiangyi Wen A DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the University of Nebraska Graduate College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Pharmacology & Experimental Neuroscience Graduate Program Under the Supervision of Professor Wallace B. Thoreson University of Nebraska Medical Center Omaha, NE August, 2018 Supervisory Committee: Wallace B. Thoreson, Ph.D. Woo-Yang Kim, Ph.D. Anna Dunaevsky, Ph.D. George Rozanski, Ph.D. Huangui Xiong, M.D. Ph.D. This work is dedicated to my family. i Acknowledgements I would like to thank my mentor Dr. Wallace (Wally) B. Thoreson for his careful instruction and support throughout my graduate study. Wally patiently answered any questions about science and non-science, discussed and designed detailed steps with me. His precise attitude to science guided me into the world of science and my future career. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee: Dr. Woo-Yang Kim, Ph.D., Dr. Anna Dunaevsky, Ph.D., Dr. George Rozanski, Ph.D., and Dr. Huangui Xiong, M.D. Ph.D. for their advice and support with my thesis project. I would like to thank all the laboratory members who directly or indirectly helped me to finish my work. In particular, I would like to thank Dr. Matthew (Matt) J. Van Hook for his great help in experiments and especially in learning new techniques. He is a great teacher for electrophysiological techniques and helped me to be familiar with the environment when I joined our lab. He also contributed to some of the data shown in Figure 8. I would like to thank Dr. Minghui Chen and Grant Saltzgaber for their kind help with TIRFM experiments. I would also like to thank Dr. Karlene Cork, Dr. Ted Warren, Justin Grassmeyer, Cody Barta, Asia Cahill, and Cassandra Hays for discussion and support in helping to obtain my degree. I would like to thank Dr. Scott Nawy from the Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences for discussion and suggestions for my projects. I would like to thank Tom Bargar from the Electron Microscopy Core Facility (EMCF) for his help with electron microscopy imaging in Figures 2 and 17. I am grateful to the late Dr. Richard Hallworth from Creighton University for assistance with the FRAP experiments in Figure 3. ii I would also like to thank staff members within the Departments of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences and Pharmacology & Experimental Neuroscience for their kind help with ordering and other paperwork. Finally, I want to thank my family for their support for my years of education. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ i Abstract .......................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 4 I. Retinal Anatomy .................................................................................................. 4 II. Photoreceptor anatomy ........................................................................................ 6 a. Photoreceptors .................................................................................................. 6 b. Ultrastructure of photoreceptor ribbon synapses ............................................... 7 c. Proteins at the ribbon synapse ........................................................................ 11 III. Phototransduction ...........................................................................................14 a. Rhodopsin cascade ......................................................................................... 14 b. Cone opsins and their spectral sensitivity ........................................................ 16 IV. Synaptic release from photoreceptors .............................................................17 a. Ribbon release ................................................................................................ 17 b. Exocytosis and endocytosis ............................................................................ 21 c. CICR and non-ribbon release from rods .......................................................... 24 V. Retinal circuits ....................................................................................................26 VI. Lateral feedback signals in the OPL ................................................................30 Chapter 2 Endocytosis sustains release at photoreceptor ribbon synapses by restoring fusion competence...................................................................................... 40 I. Abstract: .............................................................................................................40 II. Introduction: ........................................................................................................40 III. Materials and Methods ....................................................................................43 a. Animal care and use ........................................................................................ 43 iv b. Retinal slices ................................................................................................... 43 c. Patch-clamp electrophysiology ........................................................................ 44 d. Reagents ......................................................................................................... 45 e. Photoreceptor isolation .................................................................................... 46 f. TIRFM experiments ......................................................................................... 46 g. Statistical Analysis ........................................................................................... 49 IV. Results ............................................................................................................49 a. Paired pulse depression is extended by inhibiting endocytosis ........................ 49 b. TIRFM imaging of single vesicles .................................................................... 55 c. Impact of dynasore on ribbon-mediated release visualized by TIRFM ............. 64 V. Discussion ..........................................................................................................70 Chapter 3 Kiss-and-run is a significant contributor to synaptic exocytosis and endocytosis in photoreceptors .................................................................................. 78 I. Abstract: .............................................................................................................78 II. Introduction: ........................................................................................................79 III. Materials and Methods: ...................................................................................81 a. Animal care and use ........................................................................................ 81 b. Reagents ......................................................................................................... 81 c. Photoreceptor isolation .................................................................................... 82 d. Capacitance measurements of endocytosis .................................................... 82 e. Whole-terminal fluorescence measurements ................................................... 84 f. In vitro dye fluorescence measurements ......................................................... 85 g. Dye release measurements in retinal slices ..................................................... 85 v h. Electron microscopy ........................................................................................ 86 i. TIRFM experiments ......................................................................................... 87 j. Statistical Analysis ........................................................................................... 89 IV. Results: ...........................................................................................................89 a. Rapid endocytosis in photoreceptors. .............................................................. 89 b. Small dyes were loaded preferentially into synaptic terminals. ........................ 92 c. Dyes were loaded into synaptic vesicles.......................................................... 96 d. Impact of endocytosis inhibitors on uptake of large and small dyes ................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Identification of Secretory Granule Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate- Interacting Proteins Using an Affinity Pulldown Strategy*□S
    Research Identification of Secretory Granule Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Bisphosphate- interacting Proteins Using an Affinity Pulldown Strategy*□S Shona L. Osborne‡§, Tristan P. Wallis¶ʈ, Jose L. Jimenez**, Jeffrey J. Gorman¶ʈ, and Frederic A. Meunier‡§‡‡ Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PtdIns(4,5)P2) syn- required for secretion is synthesized on the plasma mem- thesis is required for calcium-dependent exocytosis in neu- brane (4), and the binding of vesicle-associated proteins to rosecretory cells. We developed a PtdIns(4,5)P2 bead pull- PtdIns(4,5)P2 in trans is thought to be important for bringing down strategy combined with subcellular fractionation to the vesicle and plasma membranes together prior to exocy- Downloaded from identify endogenous chromaffin granule proteins that inter- tosis to ensure rapid and efficient fusion upon calcium influx act with PtdIns(4,5)P . We identified two synaptotagmin iso- 2 (5). Putative PtdIns(4,5)P effectors include synaptotagmin 1 forms, synaptotagmins 1 and 7; spectrin; ␣-adaptin; and 2 (Syt1) (6, 7), calcium-activated protein for secretion (CAPS) (8, synaptotagmin-like protein 4 (granuphilin) by mass spec- 9), and rabphilin (10). trometry and Western blotting. The interaction between https://www.mcponline.org CAPS binds to PtdIns(4,5)P2 and is a potential PtdIns(4,5)P2 synaptotagmin 7 and PtdIns(4,5)P2 and its functional rele- vance was investigated. The 45-kDa isoform of synaptotag- effector for priming of secretory granule exocytosis (9). How- min 7 was found to be highly expressed in adrenal chromaf- ever, recent work on the CAPS1 knock-out mouse highlighted fin cells compared with PC12 cells and to mainly localize to an involvement of CAPS1 in the refilling or storage of cate- secretory granules by subcellular fractionation, immunoiso- cholamine in mature secretory granules therefore suggesting lation, and immunocytochemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • Synaptotagmin 7 Switches Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity from Depression
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Synaptotagmin 7 switches short‑term synaptic plasticity from depression to facilitation by suppressing synaptic transmission Takaaki Fujii1, Akira Sakurai1, J. Troy Littleton2 & Motojiro Yoshihara1* Short‑term synaptic plasticity is a fast and robust modifcation in neuronal presynaptic output that can enhance release strength to drive facilitation or diminish it to promote depression. The mechanisms that determine whether neurons display short‑term facilitation or depression are still unclear. Here we show that the Ca2+‑binding protein Synaptotagmin 7 (Syt7) determines the sign of short‑term synaptic plasticity by controlling the initial probability of synaptic vesicle (SV) fusion. Electrophysiological analysis of Syt7 null mutants at Drosophila embryonic neuromuscular junctions demonstrate loss of the protein converts the normally observed synaptic facilitation response during repetitive stimulation into synaptic depression. In contrast, overexpression of Syt7 dramatically enhanced the magnitude of short‑term facilitation. These changes in short‑term plasticity were mirrored by corresponding alterations in the initial evoked response, with SV release probability enhanced in Syt7 mutants and suppressed following Syt7 overexpression. Indeed, Syt7 mutants were able to display facilitation in lower [Ca2+] where release was reduced. These data suggest Syt7 does not act by directly sensing residual Ca2+ and argues for the existence of a distinct Ca2+ sensor beyond Syt7 that mediates facilitation. Instead, Syt7 normally suppresses synaptic transmission to maintain an output range where facilitation is available to the neuron. Synaptotagmins (Syts) are a large family of Ca2+ binding proteins, with the Syt1 isoform functioning as the major Ca2+ sensor for synchronous synaptic vesicle (SV) fusion1. Ca2+ also controls presynaptic forms of short-term plasticity, with other Syt isoforms representing promising candidates to mediate these processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Between the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Peroxisomes in Mammalian Cells
    Communication between the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Peroxisomes in Mammalian Cells by Rong Hua A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biochemistry University of Toronto © Copyright by Rong Hua (2017) ii Communication between the Endoplasmic Reticulum and Peroxisomes in Mammalian Cells Rong Hua Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biochemistry University of Toronto 2017 Abstract Peroxisomes are important metabolic organelles found in virtually all eukaryotic cells. Since their discovery, peroxisomes have long been seen in close proximity to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The interplay between the two organelles is suggested to be important for peroxisome biogenesis as the ER may serve as a source for both lipids and peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs) for peroxisome growth and maintenance. On the other hand, various lipid molecules are exchanged between them for the biosynthesis of specialized lipids such as bile acids, plasmalogens and cholesterol. However, how proteins and lipids are transported between the two organelles is not yet fully understood. Previously, the peroxisomal biogenesis factor PEX16 was shown to serve as a receptor for PMPs in the ER and also as a mediator of the subsequent transport of these ER-targeted PMPs to peroxisomes. Here, I extended these results by carrying out a comprehensive mutational analysis of PEX16 aimed at gaining insights into the molecular targeting signals responsible for its ER-to-peroxisome trafficking and the domain(s) involved in its PMP recruitment function at the ER. I also showed that the recruitment function of PEX16 is conserved in plants. To gain further mechanistic insight into PEX16 function, the proteins proximal to iii PEX16 were identified using the proximity-dependent BioID analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Minimum-Labeling Approach for Reconstructing Protein Networks Across Multiple Conditions
    A Minimum-Labeling Approach for Reconstructing Protein Networks across Multiple Conditions Arnon Mazza1, Irit Gat-Viks2, Hesso Farhan3, and Roded Sharan1 1 Blavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. Email: [email protected]. 2 Dept. of Cell Research and Immunology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel. 3 Biotechnology Institute Thurgau, University of Konstanz, Unterseestrasse 47, CH-8280 Kreuzlingen, Switzerland. Abstract. The sheer amounts of biological data that are generated in recent years have driven the development of network analysis tools to fa- cilitate the interpretation and representation of these data. A fundamen- tal challenge in this domain is the reconstruction of a protein-protein sub- network that underlies a process of interest from a genome-wide screen of associated genes. Despite intense work in this area, current algorith- mic approaches are largely limited to analyzing a single screen and are, thus, unable to account for information on condition-specific genes, or reveal the dynamics (over time or condition) of the process in question. Here we propose a novel formulation for network reconstruction from multiple-condition data and devise an efficient integer program solution for it. We apply our algorithm to analyze the response to influenza in- fection in humans over time as well as to analyze a pair of ER export related screens in humans. By comparing to an extant, single-condition tool we demonstrate the power of our new approach in integrating data from multiple conditions in a compact and coherent manner, capturing the dynamics of the underlying processes. 1 Introduction With the increasing availability of high-throughput data, network biol- arXiv:1307.7803v1 [q-bio.QM] 30 Jul 2013 ogy has become the method of choice for filtering, interpreting and rep- resenting these data.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials
    1 Supplementary Materials: Supplemental Figure 1. Gene expression profiles of kidneys in the Fcgr2b-/- and Fcgr2b-/-. Stinggt/gt mice. (A) A heat map of microarray data show the genes that significantly changed up to 2 fold compared between Fcgr2b-/- and Fcgr2b-/-. Stinggt/gt mice (N=4 mice per group; p<0.05). Data show in log2 (sample/wild-type). 2 Supplemental Figure 2. Sting signaling is essential for immuno-phenotypes of the Fcgr2b-/-lupus mice. (A-C) Flow cytometry analysis of splenocytes isolated from wild-type, Fcgr2b-/- and Fcgr2b-/-. Stinggt/gt mice at the age of 6-7 months (N= 13-14 per group). Data shown in the percentage of (A) CD4+ ICOS+ cells, (B) B220+ I-Ab+ cells and (C) CD138+ cells. Data show as mean ± SEM (*p < 0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001). 3 Supplemental Figure 3. Phenotypes of Sting activated dendritic cells. (A) Representative of western blot analysis from immunoprecipitation with Sting of Fcgr2b-/- mice (N= 4). The band was shown in STING protein of activated BMDC with DMXAA at 0, 3 and 6 hr. and phosphorylation of STING at Ser357. (B) Mass spectra of phosphorylation of STING at Ser357 of activated BMDC from Fcgr2b-/- mice after stimulated with DMXAA for 3 hour and followed by immunoprecipitation with STING. (C) Sting-activated BMDC were co-cultured with LYN inhibitor PP2 and analyzed by flow cytometry, which showed the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of IAb expressing DC (N = 3 mice per group). 4 Supplemental Table 1. Lists of up and down of regulated proteins Accession No.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Identities in Evs Isolated from U87-MG GBM Cells As Determined by NG LC-MS/MS
    Protein identities in EVs isolated from U87-MG GBM cells as determined by NG LC-MS/MS. No. Accession Description Σ Coverage Σ# Proteins Σ# Unique Peptides Σ# Peptides Σ# PSMs # AAs MW [kDa] calc. pI 1 A8MS94 Putative golgin subfamily A member 2-like protein 5 OS=Homo sapiens PE=5 SV=2 - [GG2L5_HUMAN] 100 1 1 7 88 110 12,03704523 5,681152344 2 P60660 Myosin light polypeptide 6 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MYL6 PE=1 SV=2 - [MYL6_HUMAN] 100 3 5 17 173 151 16,91913397 4,652832031 3 Q6ZYL4 General transcription factor IIH subunit 5 OS=Homo sapiens GN=GTF2H5 PE=1 SV=1 - [TF2H5_HUMAN] 98,59 1 1 4 13 71 8,048185945 4,652832031 4 P60709 Actin, cytoplasmic 1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=ACTB PE=1 SV=1 - [ACTB_HUMAN] 97,6 5 5 35 917 375 41,70973209 5,478027344 5 P13489 Ribonuclease inhibitor OS=Homo sapiens GN=RNH1 PE=1 SV=2 - [RINI_HUMAN] 96,75 1 12 37 173 461 49,94108966 4,817871094 6 P09382 Galectin-1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=LGALS1 PE=1 SV=2 - [LEG1_HUMAN] 96,3 1 7 14 283 135 14,70620005 5,503417969 7 P60174 Triosephosphate isomerase OS=Homo sapiens GN=TPI1 PE=1 SV=3 - [TPIS_HUMAN] 95,1 3 16 25 375 286 30,77169764 5,922363281 8 P04406 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase OS=Homo sapiens GN=GAPDH PE=1 SV=3 - [G3P_HUMAN] 94,63 2 13 31 509 335 36,03039959 8,455566406 9 Q15185 Prostaglandin E synthase 3 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PTGES3 PE=1 SV=1 - [TEBP_HUMAN] 93,13 1 5 12 74 160 18,68541938 4,538574219 10 P09417 Dihydropteridine reductase OS=Homo sapiens GN=QDPR PE=1 SV=2 - [DHPR_HUMAN] 93,03 1 1 17 69 244 25,77302971 7,371582031 11 P01911 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen,
    [Show full text]
  • A Web-Platform for Analysis of Host Factors Involved in Viral Infections Discovered by Genome Wide Rnai Screen
    Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI) for Molecular BioSystems. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2017 vhfRNAi: A web-platform for analysis of host factors involved in viral infections discovered by genome wide RNAi screen Anamika Thakur#, Abid Qureshi# and Manoj Kumar* Bioinformatics Centre, Institute of Microbial Technology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Sector 39A, Chandigarh-160036, India #Equal contribution * To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel, 91-172-6665453; Fax, 91-172- 2690585; 91-172-2690632; Email, [email protected] Supplementary Tables Table S1: Statistics of unique and duplicate host factors in each virus Table S2: Table denoting genes common among different viruses Table S3: Statistics of GWAS analysis Table S1. Statistics of unique and duplicate host factors in each virus S. No. Virus Unique-Entries Duplicate-Entries 1. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) 926 533 2. Avian influenza virus (AIV) 0 11 3. Borna disease virus (BDV) 14 20 4. Dengue virus 2 (DEN-2) 27 13 5. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) 236 213 6. Human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV) 1388 857 7. Human parainfluenza virus 3 (HPIV-3) 0 27 8. Human herpesvirus 1 (HSV-1) 34 38 9. Influenza A virus (IAV) 700 513 10. Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) 0 54 11. Marburgvirus (MARV) 0 11 12. Poliovirus (PV) 3340 1035 13. Rotavirus (RV) 347 175 14. Sendai virus (SeV) 32 27 15. Sindbis virus (SIV) 70 41 16. Vaccinia virus (VACV) 482 296 17. Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) 9 78 18. West Nile virus (WNV) 313 137 Table S1. Statistics of unique host factors for each virus having overlapping and unique factors in different viruses Non-overlap – Overall- S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lysosome Biogenesis and Lysosomal Membrane Proteins: Trafficking Meets Function
    FOCUS ON ENDOCYTOREVIEWSSIS Lysosome biogenesis and lysosomal membrane proteins: trafficking meets function Paul Saftig* and Judith Klumperman‡ Abstract | Lysosomes are the primary catabolic compartments of eukaryotic cells. They degrade extracellular material that has been internalized by endocytosis and intracellular components that have been sequestered by autophagy. In addition, specialized cells contain lysosome-related organelles that store and secrete proteins for cell-type-specific functions. The functioning of a healthy cell is dependent on the proper targeting of newly synthesized lysosomal proteins. Accumulating evidence suggests that there are multiple lysosomal delivery pathways that together allow the regulated and sequential deposition of lysosomal components. The importance of lysosomal trafficking pathways is emphasized by recent findings that reveal new roles for lysosomal membrane proteins in cellular physiology and in an increasing number of diseases that are characterized by defects in lysosome biogenesis. Lysosome-related organelle Lysosomes are ubiquitous organelles that constitute the limiting membrane and have diverse functions, including (LRO). A cell-type-specific primary degradative compartments of the cell. They acidification of the lysosomal lumen, protein import from organelle belonging to a family receive their substrates through endocytosis, phago­ the cytosol, membrane fusion and transport of degrada­ that includes melanosomes, cytosis or autophagy (FIGS 1,2). The catabolic function of tion products to the cytoplasm8 (FIG. 1). The most abun­ platelet-dense bodies and lysosomes is complemented by lysosome-related organelles dant LMPs are lysosome­associated membrane protein 1 cytotoxic T cell granules. LROs contain subsets of lysosomal (LROs), such as melanosomes, lytic granules, major histo­ (LAMP1), LAMP2, lysosome integral membrane pro­ proteins in addition to compatibility complex (MHC) class II compartments and tein 2 (LIMP2; also known as SCARB2) and the tetraspanin cell-type-specific proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Insulin Secretion Correlates with Decreased Expression of Exocytotic Genes in Pancreatic Islets from Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
    Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 364 (2012) 36–45 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mce Reduced insulin secretion correlates with decreased expression of exocytotic genes in pancreatic islets from patients with type 2 diabetes Sofia A. Andersson a, Anders H. Olsson b, Jonathan L.S. Esguerra a, Emilia Heimann e, Claes Ladenvall c, Anna Edlund a, Albert Salehi d, Jalal Taneera c, Eva Degerman e, Leif Groop c, Charlotte Ling b, ⇑ Lena Eliasson a, a Islet Cell Exocytosis, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden b Epigenetics and Diabetes, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden c Diabetes and Endocrinology, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden d Islet Cell Physiology, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden e Department of Experimental Medical Sciences, Biomedical Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden article info abstract Article history: Reduced insulin release has been linked to defect exocytosis in b-cells. However, whether expression of Received 14 December 2011 genes suggested to be involved in the exocytotic process (exocytotic genes) is altered in pancreatic islets Received in revised form 7 August 2012 from patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and correlate to insulin secretion, needs to be further investi- Accepted 13 August 2012 gated. Available online 23 August 2012 Analysing expression levels of 23 exocytotic genes using microarray revealed reduced expression of five genes in human T2D islets (v2 = 13.25; p < 0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • The Molecular Machinery of Neurotransmitter Release Nobel Lecture, 7 December 2013
    The Molecular Machinery of Neurotransmitter Release Nobel Lecture, 7 December 2013 by Thomas C. Südhof Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, USA. 1. THE NEUROTRANSMITTER RELEASE ENIGMA Synapses have a long history in science. Synapses were frst functionally demon- strated by Emil duBois-Reymond (1818–1896), were morphologically identifed by classical neuroanatomists such as Rudolf von Kölliker (1817–1905) and San- tiago Ramon y Cajal (1852–1934), and named in 1897 by Michael Foster (1836– 1907). Although the chemical nature of synaptic transmission was already sug- gested by duBois-Reymond, it was long disputed because of its incredible speed. Over time, however, overwhelming evidence established that most synapses use chemical messengers called neurotransmitters, most notably with the pioneer- ing contributions by Otto Loewi (1873–1961), Henry Dale (1875–1968), Ulf von Euler (1905–1983), and Julius Axelrod (1912–2004). In parallel, arguably the most important advance to understanding how synapses work was provided by Bernard Katz (1911–2003), who elucidated the principal mechanism of syn- aptic transmission (Katz, 1969). Most initial studies on synapses were carried out on the neuromuscular junction, and central synapses have only come to the fore in recent decades. Here, major contributions by many scientists, including George Palade, Rodolfo Llinas, Chuck Stevens, Bert Sakmann, Eric Kandel, and Victor Whittaker, to name just a few, not only confrmed the principal results obtained in the neuromuscular junction by Katz, but also revealed that synapses 259 6490_Book.indb 259 11/4/14 2:29 PM 260 The Nobel Prizes exhibit an enormous diversity of properties as well as an unexpected capacity for plasticity.
    [Show full text]