Making It Happen V General Information

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Making It Happen V General Information Tab 21/12/06 12:24 pm Page 3 H F O F S B M J O G P S N S B e U c J P tion O B . NBLJOHJUIBQQFOHFOFSBMJOGPSNBUJPO ANBLJOHJUIBQQFOHFOFSBMJOGPSNBUJPO Tab 21/12/06 12:24 pm Page 4 O P J U B N S P G O J M B S F O F H 5IJTQBSUPGNBLJOHJUIBQQFOIBTHFOFSBMBEWJDFBOEHVJEBODFBCPVU PWUIFBENJOJTUSBUJWFFBSSBOHFNFOUTJO,SFOUBOEUIFQSWPDFEVSFTGPS JFX EFWFMPQNFOU ANBLJOHJUIBQQFOHFOFSBMJOGPSNBUJPO H F O F S B M J O G P S N B U J P PWFSWJFX O ANBLJOHJUIBQQFOHFOFSBMJOGPSNBUJPO n BACKGROUND Obtaining planning permission from the local District Planning Authority does o i not mean you are entitled to work on the existing highway. You must obtain the t The administrative responsibilities in the County of Kent are shared between Kent a County Council, the twelve District Planning Authorities, Medway Council and the Divisional Manager’s approval before starting any work in, on or over the highway. m r Parish and Town Councils. o f Sewer connections require consent from the relevant drainage undertaker before n i you discharge into them. Outline planning applications for all new residential and Medway Council, established on the 1 April 1998, is a unitary authority and is l industrial estate schemes must indicate the method of surface water disposal from a responsible for services in the Medway area. r the site. e n e Kent County Council is the Highway Authority responsible for all publicly g maintainable highways with the exception of motorways and trunk roads, which Such disposals will often necessitate permission being obtained from the owner of are the responsibility of the Department of Transport. adjacent land. The Environment Agency may be involved with the drainage aspects of the scheme and you may need approval from them before installing soakaways Kent County Council is the Planning Authority for determining applications relating or SUDS Solutions. to minerals and waste disposal matters. It advises on transportation and tra!c issues relating to strategically important schemes and is responsible for producing In some circumstances it will be necessary for you to supply details of tra!c the Structure Plan for Kent. The Kent and Medway Structure Plan has been prepared generation and proposed access to the site. We will also need to be satis"ed that jointly with Medway Council and includes advice about parking standards which su!cient land is available to meet visibility and other requirements. are not included in making it happen. 4 You will be expected to transfer to us the land upon which the proposed highway The twelve District Planning Authorities are responsible for preparing Local Plans, will be situated. which are being replaced by Local Development Frameworks, covering land use development in their areas. Their development control functions relate solely to Kent Highway Services housing and other minor development including householder applications. Kent Highway Services is part of Kent County Council. It is the department responsible for looking after and ensuring the e#ective use of all roads, footways PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT and cycleways in the county, except Motorways and Trunk Roads that are the When submitting a planning application you should contact the local District responsibility of the Department for Transport. Planning Authority in the "rst instance (see map and contact details on pages 5/6) The county of Kent has been divided into three areas (see Map on page 5), West Applications involving S.38 and S.278 agreements should be referred to the relevant Kent, Mid Kent and East Kent. The service is delivered through a divisional o!ce Divisional Manager. There are three Divisional Managers, each responsible for based in each area, although sometimes you may need to speak to other members conducting the work of Kent Highway Services in their respective area. of sta# based at our headquarters in Maidstone. Road opening notices are required from us before excavations can be made in the Each division is made up of four District Planning Authorities. You will need to public highway. You will be required to comply with the requirements of the New contact the relevant local District Planning Authority regarding your planning Road and Street Works Act 1991. applicaton. ‘making it happen’ general information H F .FEXBZ$PVODJM &BTU,FOU%JWJTJPO O 8FTU,FOU%JWJTJPO $PNQBTT$FOUSF #FFS F +PZOFT)PVTF S $IBUIBN.BSJUJNF $BSU-BOF B (SBWFTFOE $IBUIBN $BOUFSCVSZ M %"0"5 J ,FOU.&:) $5// O G P S N B U J P O 8FBSFFYQFDUJOHPVSEJWJTJPOBMPîDFTUP NPWFMPDBUJPOJOUIFGVUVSFXJUIUIFMJLFMJIPPE PG4XBMFBOE"TIGPSE%JTUSJDUTDPNJOHVOEFS .JE,FOU%JWJTJPO &BTU,FOUBOE.BJETUPOFBOE5VOCSJEHF %PVCMFEBZ)PVTF 4U.JDIBFMT$MPTF 8FMMTDPNJOHVOEFS8FTU,FOU$POUBDUPVS "ZMFTGPSE DBMMDFOUSFPOUPTQFBLUPB .&#6 NFNCFSPGTUBí ANBLJOHJUIBQQFOHFOFSBMJOGPSNBUJPO O P J -0$"-1-"//*/("65)03*5*&4*/,&/5 U B "TIGPSE#PSPVHI$PVODJM (SBWFTIBN#PSPVHI$PVODJM 4XBMF#PSPVHI$PVODJM N $JWJD$FOUSF $JWJD$FOUSF 4XBMF)PVTF S P 5BOOFSZ-BOF 8JOENJMM4USFFU &BTU4USFFU G "TIGPSE (SBWFTFOE 4JUUJOHCPVSOF O J ,FOU5/1- ,FOU%""6 ,FOU.&)5 M 5 5 5 B S ' ' ' F & NFEJB!BTIGPSEHPWVL XXXHSBWFTIBNHPWVL XXXTXBMFHPWVL O F XXXBTIGPSEHPWVL H ,FOU$PVOUZ$PVODJM 5IBOFU%JTUSJDU$PVODJM $BOUFSCVSZ$JUZ$PVODJM $PVOUZ)BMM $PVODJM0öDFT $PVODJM0ö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öDFT 5 5VOCSJEHF8FMMT#PSPVHI$PVODJM 8IJUF$MJõT#VTJOFTT1BSL ' 5PXO)BMM %PWFS & JOGPSNBUJPO!TFWFOPBLTHPWVL 3PZBM5VOCSJEHF8FMMT ,FOU$51+ XXXTFWFOPBLTHPWVL ,FOU5/34 5 5 ' 4IFQXBZ%JTUSJDU$PVODJM ' & DF!EPWFSHPWVL $JWJD$FOUSF & JOGP!UVOCSJEHFXFMMTHPWVL XXXEPWFSHPWVL $BTUMF)JMM"WFOVF XXXUVOCSJEHFXFMMTHPWVL 'PMLFTUPOF ,FOU$52: 5 ' & TIFQXBZ!TIFQXBZHPWVL XXXTIFQXBZHPWVL ANBLJOHJUIBQQFOHFOFSBMJOGPSNBUJPO.
Recommended publications
  • Between Kent County Council and the Armed Forces
    BETWEEN KENT COUNTY COUNCIL AND THE ARMED FORCES COMMUNITY IN KENT THE ARMED FORCES COMMUNITY COVENANT FOR KENT We, the undersigned, agree to work and act together to honour the Armed Forces Community Covenant. Signatories Signed on behalf of Kent County Signed on behalf of the Military Council Community Alex King MBE Brigadier Simon P Wolsey OBE Deputy Leader Regional Brigade Commander Kent County Council 2 (South East) Brigade SECTION 1: PARTICIPANTS 1.1 This Armed Forces Community Covenant is made between: The serving and former members of the Armed Forces and their families working and residing in Kent and Kent County Council SECTION 2: PRINCIPLES OF THE ARMED FORCES COMMUNITY COVENANT 2.1 The Armed Forces Community Covenant is a voluntary statement of mutual support between a civilian community and its local Armed Forces Community. It is intended to complement the Armed Forces Covenant, which outlines the moral obligation between the Nation, the Government and the Armed Forces, at the local level. 2.2 The purpose of this Community Covenant is to encourage support for the Armed Forces Community working and residing in Kent and to recognise and remember the sacrifices made by members of this Armed Forces Community, particularly those who have given the most. This includes serving Service personnel and Service veterans, their families and their widow(er)s in Kent 2.3 For Kent County Council, the Community Covenant presents an opportunity to bring its knowledge, experience and expertise to bear on the provision of help and advice to members of the Armed Forces Community. It also presents an opportunity to build upon existing good work on other initiatives, such as the Welfare Pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Sciences Industry Report
    Statistical Bulletin April 2021 Life Science industries in Kent Related Life science industries are those which are documents involved with pharmaceuticals, medical For more information on technology (devices and diagnostics) and the economy in Kent medical biotechnology. They contribute please visit our webpages toward human health and the well-being of the Economy and Employment population. These include information This bulletin looks at the number of about Business in Kent, enterprises and employee jobs in life science Business Sectors, industries in Kent. Earnings and Income, Employment, Summary Unemployment and Kent’s • workforce 2.6% of businesses in Kent as at 2020 were life science enterprises, slightly lower than the NOTE: within this bulletin England average of 2.8% ’Kent’ refers to the Kent County Council (KCC) area • Maidstone district has the highest number of life which excludes Medway science enterprises (215) in Kent. • The majority of life science enterprises in Kent (77.2%) are human health industries (which Further Information includes hospitals, medical and dental practices) Kent Analytics • 8.4% of employee jobs in Kent are in life science Kent County Council (9.3% in the South East, 8.8% in England) Invicta House Maidstone • Life science jobs have grown by 7.4% national Kent since 2015. Kent saw a small reduction of 1.0%. ME14 1XX • The majority of life science employee jobs in Email: Kent (83.8%) are in human health industries [email protected] Tel: 03000 417444 Kent Analytics, Kent County Council www.kent.gov.uk/research Introduction Life science industries are those which are involved with pharmaceuticals, medical technology (devices and diagnostics) and medical biotechnology.
    [Show full text]
  • List of 100 Priority Places
    Priority Places Place Lead Authority Argyll and Bute Argyll and Bute Council Barnsley Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Barrow-in-Furness Cumbria County Council Bassetlaw Nottinghamshire County Council Birmingham West Midlands Combined Authority Blackburn with Darwen Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council Blackpool Blackpool Council Blaenau Gwent Blaenau Gwent Council Bolton Greater Manchester Combined Authority Boston Lincolnshire County Council Bradford West Yorkshire Combined Authority Burnley Lancashire County Council Calderdale West Yorkshire Combined Authority Canterbury Kent County Council Carmarthenshire Carmarthenshire Council Ceredigion Ceredigion Council Conwy Conwy County Borough Council Corby Northamptonshire County Council* Cornwall Cornwall Council County Durham Durham County Council Darlington Tees Valley Combined Authority Denbighshire Denbighshire County Council Derbyshire Dales Derbyshire County Council Doncaster Sheffield City Region Combined Authority Dudley West Midlands Combined Authority Dumfries and Galloway Dumfries and Galloway Council East Ayrshire East Ayrshire Council East Lindsey Lincolnshire County Council East Northamptonshire Northamptonshire County Council* Falkirk Falkirk Council Fenland Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Combined Authority Gateshead Gateshead Council Glasgow City Glasgow City Council Gravesham Kent County Council Great Yarmouth Norfolk County Council Gwynedd Gwynedd Council Harlow Essex County Council Hartlepool Tees Valley Combined Authority Hastings East Sussex County Council
    [Show full text]
  • UASC Capacity Support - Proposed Distribution of £21.3M Allocation Is Based on Latest Available Home Office Management Data Capturing Numbers at September
    UASC capacity support - proposed distribution of £21.3m Allocation is based on latest available Home Office management data capturing numbers at September. The information on NTS transfers has been confirmed by the Strategic Migration Partnership leads and is accurate up to December 2017. Please see attached FAQ and methodology document for further information. Local Authority Amount Total 21,258,203.00 London Borough of Barking and Dagenham £ 141,094.00 London Borough of Barnet £ 282,189.00 Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bath and North East Somerset Council £ 94,063.00 Bedford Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 London Borough of Bexley £ 282,189.00 Birmingham City Council £ 188,126.00 Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Bournemouth Borough Council £ 141,094.00 Bracknell Forest Council £ 94,063.00 Bradford Metropolitan District Council £ 94,063.00 London Borough of Brent £ 329,219.00 Brighton and Hove City Council £ 188,126.00 Bristol City Council £ 188,126.00 London Borough of Bromley £ 141,094.00 Buckinghamshire County Council £ 188,126.00 Bury Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council £ 94,063.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £ 235,157.00 London Borough of Camden £ 329,219.00 Central Bedfordshire Council £ 282,189.00 Cheshire East Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 Cheshire West and Chester Council £ 94,063.00 City of London £ 94,063.00 City of Nottingham Council £ 94,063.00 Cornwall Council (Unitary) £ 94,063.00 Coventry City
    [Show full text]
  • The Constitution of Kent County Council
    The Constitution of Kent County Council Contents Part One: The Articles 1. The Constitution – Page 2 2. The Council – Page 2 3. The Executive – Page 2 4. The Member – Page 3 5. The Officer – Page 3 Part Two: Functions and Decision-Making 6. The Constitution of Kent County Council – Page 4 7. The Powers of the Council – Page 5 8. The Council and Executive – Page 6 9. The Leader and Executive – Page 11 10. Schemes of Delegation – Page 16 11. Delegations to Officers – Page 18 12. Decision Making – Page 27 13. Financial Procedures – Page 34 Part Three: Standing Orders 14. County Council Meetings – Page 46 15. Meetings: Common Procedures – Page 55 16. Common Committee Procedures – Page 61 17. Individual Council Committees – Page 65 18. Cabinet and Cabinet Committees – Page 92 19. Partnership – Page 96 20. The Public – Page 104 Part Four: People and Values 21. Members – Page 108 (Code of Members Conduct – Page 113) 22. Convention on Member: Officer Relations – Page 123 23. Code of Officers Conduct – Page 135 24. Management Structure – Page 146 25. Personnel Management Rules – Page 148 26. Other Provisions – Page 156 Index – Page 163 1 Part One: The Articles 1. The Constitution (a) This Council operates solely within the law and exercises the powers granted by Parliament and Government. (b) This Constitution explains how these powers will be exercised. (c) Where the law and Constitution are found to be in conflict, the law shall take precedence. In all other cases, no action shall be taken by the Council or its representatives that is contrary to the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Board Structure 2021/22
    BOARD STRUCTURE 2021/22 LEADERSHIP TEAM President Paula Hewitt Somerset County Council Vice President Mark Kemp Hertfordshire County Council Second Vice President Anthony Payne Plymouth City Council Second Vice President Sue Halliwell West Berkshire Council Immediate Past President Nigel Riglar South Gloucestershire Council Chief Operating Officer Hannah Bartram ADEPT Adrian Smith Nottinghamshire County Council Steve Read West Sussex County Council Matt Davey West Sussex County Council Marcus Lloyd CSS Wales / Caerphilly Steve Cox Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Councils Damien McQuillan Dept. for Infrastructure, NI Ian Thompson Buckinghamshire Council Ewan Wallace SCOTS/Aberdeenshire Council Mark Stevens London Borough of Haringey Angela Jones Cumbria County Council Neil Gibson SMART Places/Live Labs Champion Darryl Eyers Staffordshire County Council SUBJECT BOARDS ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENT SUSTAINABLE GROWTH TRANSPORT & CONNECTIVITY Chair: Mark Stevens Chair: Steve Read Chair: Ian Thompson Chair: Mark Kemp London Borough of Haringey West Sussex County Council Buckinghamshire Council Hertfordshire County Council [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Secretary: James Chadwick Secretary: Liz Kirkham Secretary: Tracey Butcher Secretary: Adele Adamson Staffordshire County Council Gloucestershire County Council West Sussex County Council Hertfordshire County Council [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Ward-Boundary-Reference-Maps.Pdf
    Statistical Bulletin June 2021 Ward boundary changes in Kent:2019 Related An illustration of the electoral ward documents boundaries within the Kent County Council The Kent Geography Area adopted in May 2019, resulting from the page for information on Periodic Electoral Review carried out by The other boundaries within Local Government Boundary Commission for Kent. England (LGBCE). The Population & Census for population In May 2019 there were ward boundary changes in figures for the electoral Ashford, Dartford, and Dover. The electoral wards within wards within Kent all other boroughs and districts remain as they were as at County Council 2015. The Local Government These changes mean that the total number of electoral Boundary Commission wards within Kent has reduced from 283 as at 2011 to for England 271 in 2019. See table below for totals of wards in individual areas and maps for ward names. NOTE: within this document “Kent” refers to Number of wards in each local authority the Kent County Council (KCC) area which Local Authority 2011 2015 2019 excludes Medway Unitary Ashford 35 35 39 Authority Canterbury 24 21 21 Dartford 17 17 20 Further Information Dover 21 21 17 Folkestone & Hythe (formerly Shepway) 22 13 13 Kent Analytics Gravesham 18 18 18 Invicta House Maidstone 26 26 26 Maidstone Sevenoaks 26 26 26 Kent Swale 25 24 24 ME14 1XX Thanet 23 23 23 Email: Tonbridge & Malling 26 24 24 Tunbridge Wells 20 20 20 [email protected] Kent total 283 268 271 Tel: 03000 417444 Medway Unitary Authority 22 22 22 Kent & Medway 305 290 293 Kent
    [Show full text]
  • 4. a Picture of Growth in Kent and Medway
    This chapter provides the context for growth across Kent and Medway to 2031. It gives 4. A PICTURE OF GROWTH IN an overview of the projected growth in population, employment and housing for Kent and Medway and explores the demographics and economics of that growth. In doing KENT AND MEDWAY so, it sets out key trends and projections that will affect the distribution of growth and planning to support infrastructure to 2031. In order to illustrate how Kent and Medway is changing in terms of population, demo- graphics and housing growth, the figures in this section represent the period 2011- 2031, unless stated otherwise. 4.1 POPULATION FORECASTS GIF POPULATION FORECAST The GIF uses the KCC Housing Led Forecast, produced by KCC Strategic Business Development & Intelligence, to establish a population forecast directly linked to (and constrained by) the planned housing identified for this framework. As districts are at various stages in the Local Plan process, housing trajectories can be volatile. The GIF forecast takes housing trajectories at a set point in time (September 2017) provided by Local Authorities to perform a consistent analysis of growth and need across the County. The GIF forecast shows a 2031 population of 2,127,600 – an increase of 396,300 from 2011, equivalent to 23% growth Houses in Sevenoaks, Sevenoaks DC Figure 4.1: Forecast population change 2011 to 2031 (Source: KCC GIF Forecast 2017) KENT COUNTY COUNCIL 23 Net international migration accounted for approximately The majority of people who move into Kent and Medway come a third of this net flow into Kent and Medway, and con- from London.
    [Show full text]
  • KCC ATF Eqia Scheme 3 V2 (002)
    KCC - Growth, Environment and Transport Directorate (GET). Equality Analysis / Impact Assessment (EqIA) Directorate Service: Name of decision, policy, procedure, project or service: Kent Active Travel Fund: A28 Birchington to Westgate Pathway of Equality Analysis: Summary and recommendations of equality analysis / impact assessment Kent County Council has ambitious targets for growth, and as a County Council we recognise that transport infrastructure and the environment are vital to creating sustainable developments and encourage people to live, work and play in Kent. The ability to travel quickly and safely to our destinations requires a transport network that provides a variety of travel choices that supports a growing population. As such, we have developed initial concept designs in five locations within Kent which seek to create a safer environment for both walking and cycling to offer a real choice to our residents about how they can travel throughout the County. We have received funding for the following five schemes, which are still very much in an early design stage: • Canterbury: Littlebourne Road - City Centre; • Folkestone: Central Rail Station – Cheriton; • Margate: Birchington – Westgate; • Folkestone: Hythe – Dymchurch; and • Gravesham: Gravesend – Northfleet. Date Document Updated 08/12/2020 1 This document is available in other formats. Please contact [email protected] or telephone on 03000 415 762 The schemes aim to encourage and enable active travel, which means walking or cycling as a means of transport in addition to leisure purposes – an attractive and realistic choice for short journeys. It can benefit health and wellbeing by incorporating physical activity into everyday routine as well as reduce the number of vehicles on the road and improve air quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You for Taking the Time to Attend Our Public Consultation Event for a Residential-Led Development of Around 1,600 Open
    1. Welcome Thank you for taking the time to attend our public consultation event for a residential-led development of around 1,600 open market and affordable homes, associated infrastructure, public open spaces, a link road and a new primary school on land to the South West of Birchington-on-Sea. GrENHAM BAY This is the very early stages of EppLE BAY our consultation process and MINNIS we are keen to work closely THE CENTrE BIrCHINGToN BAY with the local community over BIrCHINGToN RAILWAY STATIoN the coming months to bring CRISPE PARK A28 forward the best proposals for the village. BIrCHINGToN SquARE MINNIS RoAD RAILWAY SITE LoCATIoN BIRCHINGToN CE PRIMARY SCHooL BRooKSEND STREAM SITE LoCATIoN quEX PARK A28 B2050 ACoL HILL QUEX PARK SITE LOCATION PLAN our vision We are striving to create something aspirational, a place that we can all be proud of. Our site will be well integrated into the village, sympathetic to its surroundings, the environment and embody the principles of health and wellbeing. To achieve this we need your help. Today’s event is about us hearing your thoughts and aspirations for the site rather than presenting a completed masterplan. We embrace constructive engagement and we will not shy away from the difficult issues. The whole project team, covering a range of expertise, is on hand today to answer any questions you may have and to capture your comments and views. MINNIS BAY If you have any subsequent questions please do email us on [email protected] or pick up the phone on 0800 232 1794.
    [Show full text]
  • Thanet Parkway Railway Station Alternative Options Analysis Report
    Thanet Parkway Railway Station Alternative Options Analysis Report July 2014 [Blank Page] 2 Contents 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Manston Airport 4 1.2 Development Sites 4 1.3 Deprivation in Dover and Thanet 6 1.4 Optimising Journey Time Improvement Scheme 7 2. Existing Passenger Transport Accessibility 8 2.1 Public Transport Access to Manston Airport 8 2.2 Public Transport Access to Development Sites 8 3. Description of Options 10 3.1 Options Rejected Prior to Workshop 10 3.2 Options Considered in Workshop 11 4. Option Evaluation 12 4.1 Assessment Criteria 12 4.2 Evaluation of Options 13 4.3 Options Shortlisted for Further Consideration 18 5. Further Investigation of Option 2 (Improved Ramsgate Car Park) 20 5.1 Replace the existing station car park with a multi-storey car park 20 5.2 Build a multi-storey car park at Network Rail Maintenance Depot 21 5.3 Build a car park at Warre Recreation Ground 22 5.4 Acquire industrial land on Princes Road to construct a car park 23 5.5 Summary of findings 23 6. Further Investigation of Option 1 (a new Parkway Railway Station) 25 6.1 Manston Green Development Proposal 25 6.2 Kent County Council’s Proposed Site 25 6.3 Determination of Option 26 7. Conclusion 28 Appendix 1: Journey Time to the Manston Airport Site by Public Transport 29 3 1. Introduction This option selection report aims to identify a suitable option to improve rail connectivity to development sites in East Kent. Kent County Council’s aspiration is to encourage inward investment to East Kent and widen the job market for local people by improving the perception of East Kent as a suitable place to invest and work in.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Joint Transportation Board, 11/12
    Public Document Pack Date: 3 December 2018 Ask For: James Clapson Direct Dial: (01843) 577200 Email: [email protected] JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD 11 DECEMBER 2018 A meeting of the Joint Transportation Board will be held at 7.00 pm on Tuesday, 11 December 2018 in the Council Chamber, Cecil Street, Margate, Kent. Membership: Councillor Binks (Kent County Councillor - Broadstairs) (Chairman); Councillors: Taylor (Thanet District Council) (Vice-Chairman), K Coleman-Cooke (Thanet District Council), Connor (Thanet District Council), Crow-Brown (Thanet District Council), Rogers (Thanet District Council), Rusiecki (Thanet District Council), M Saunders (Thanet District Council), Constantine (Kent County Council - Ramsgate), Dawson (Kent County Council - Birchington & Rural), Game (Kent County Council - Cliftonville), Hurst (Kent County Councillor - Birchington & Rural), Lewis (Kent County Council - Margate), Messenger (Kent County Council - Ramsgate) and Pennington (Westgate Parish Council). A G E N D A Item Subject No 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 3. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING (Pages 3 - 4) To approve the Minutes of the Joint Transportation Board meeting held on 13 September 2018, copy attached. 4. THANET HIGHWAY WORKS PROGRAMME 2018/19 (Pages 5 - 18) 5. LOCAL WINTER SERVICE PLAN (Pages 19 - 38) 6. CASE STUDY WELL-MANAGED HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE, A PRACTICAL APPLICATION (Pages 39 - 66) 7. DRAFT THANET TRANSPORT STRATEGY (Pages 67 - 168) 8. PARKING PLACES FOR DISABLED PERSONS VEHICLES (Pages 169 - 186) Declaration of Interests Form Thanet District Council, PO Box 9, Cecil Street, Margate, Kent, CT9 1XZ Tel: +44 (0)1843 577000 Fax: +44 (0)1843 290906 DX 30555 (Margate) www.thanet.gov.uk Chief Executive: Madeline Homer Page 1 This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 3 JOINT TRANSPORTATION BOARD Minutes of the meeting held on 13 September 2018 at 7.00 pm in Council Chamber, Cecil Street, Margate, Kent.
    [Show full text]