<<

A FORMULAS FOR THE OPERATOR NORM AND THE EXTENSION OF A LINEAR FUNCTIONAL ON A LINEAR SUBSPACE OF A

1; Halil Ibrahim· Çelik 

1 Marmara University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of , Istanbul,· TURKEY E-mail: [email protected]

( Received: 25.11.2019, Accepted: 18.12.2019, Published Online: 31.12.2019)

Abstract

In this paper, formulas are given both for the operator norm and for the extension of a linear functional de…ned on a linear subspace of a Hilbert space and the results are illustrated with examples. Keywords: Linear functional; Cauchy-Schwarz inequality; norm; operator norm; Hilbert spaces; Hahn-Banach theorem; Riesz representation theorem; orthogonal vectors; orthogonal decomposition. MSC 2000: 31A05; 30C85; 31C10.

1 Introduction

Linear functionals occupy quite important place in mathematics in terms of both theory and applica- tion. The weak and weak-star topologies, which are fundamental and substantial subject in functional analysis, are generated by families of linear functionals. They are important in the theory of di¤eren- tial equations, potential theory, convexity and control theory [6]. Linear functionals play fundamental role in characterizing the topological closure of sets and therefore they are important for approxima- tion theory. They play a very important role in de…ning vector valued analytic functions, generalizing Cauchy integral theorem and Liouville theorem. Therefore the need arises naturally to construct lin- ear functionals with certain properties. The construction is usually achieved by de…ning the linear functional on a subspace of a normed linear space where it is easy to verify the desired properties and then extending it to the whole space with retaining the properties. This is not always easy in the case of general normed linear spaces. We specialize to linear functionals de…ned on the subspaces of a Hilbert space and provide formulas (Theorem 2) both for the operator norms and norm preserving linear extensions of linear functionals.

We start with basic de…nitions and results and …xed notations that will be used in the sequel. We denote the …eld of the real numbers R or the …eld of the complex numbers C by F. We denote the function by : de…ned on the …eld F. So for x R, if x < 0 then x = x and if x 0 j j 2 j j  then x = x. For z = x + iy C we have z = x2 + y2. The z = x iy is the complexj j conjugate of the number2 z = x + iyj. j p De…nition 1.1. Let X be a linear space over the …eld F and : : X R be a function. If the function : satis…es the following properties k k 7! k k 1. 0 = 0 and x > 0 for every x X 0 (positivity de…niteness); k k k k 2 n f g Ikonion Journal of Mathematics 2019, 1(2)

2. x = x for every F and x X (homogeneity); and k k j j k k 2 2 3. x + y x + y for all x; y X (triangular inequality); k k  k k k k 2 then the function : is called a norm on the space X and the pair (X; : ) is called a normed linear space. k k k k

n n Example 1.2. Let p [1; ) and R = x = (x1; : : : ; xn): xj R for j = 1; : : : ; n . R is 2 1 f 2 g a linear (vector) space over the …eld R with componentwise addition and scaler multiplication. For 1=p n n p x = (x1; : : : ; xn) R de…ne x p = j=1 xj and x = max xj : j = 1; : : : ; n . Then for 2 k k j j k k1 fj j g 1 p the functions : are norms on the space n. Hence ( n; : ) is a normed linear spaces p P  R R p for each 1p [1; ]. k k k k 2 1 Inner products spaces are very important sources of normed linear spaces.

De…nition 1.3. Let X be a linear space over the …eld F. If the function (:; :): X X F satis…es the following properties  7!

1. (x; x) 0 for all x X and (x; x) = 0 if and only if x = 0;  2 2. (x; y) = (y; x) for every x; y X; 2 3. (x + y; z) = (x; z) + (y; z) for every x; y; z X; and 2 4. ( x; y) = (x; y) for every F and for every x; y X; 2 2 then the function (:; :) is called an inner product on X and the pair (X; (:; :)) is called a over the …eld F. The number x = (x; x) is called the norm of the vector x X. If x; y X and (x; y) = 0 then the vectors x andk ky are called orthogonal vectors. 2 2 p The inner product generates the most important inequality in mathematics, namely the Cauchy- Schwarz inequality.

Theorem 1.4. [Cauchy-Schwarz inequality][2, 4] Let (X; (:; :)) be an inner product space over the …eld F. Then for every x; y X, (x; y) (x; x) (y; y) = x y . The equality occurs if and only if the vectors x and y are linearly2 j dependent.j  k k k k p p From the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality it follows that the function x = (x; x) is a norm on the space X. This norm is called the norm generated by the inner productk k function (:; :). If the normed p linear space (X; : )) is a , that is, if every Cauchy sequence in X converges to a point in X, the inner productk k space (X; (:; :)) is called a Hilbert space.

n n n Example 1.5. For x = (x1; : : : ; xn); y = (y1; : : : ; yn) R the function (:; :): R R R n 2 n  7! de…ned by (x; y) = j=1 xjyj is an inner product on the space R . The norm generated by this inner 1=2 n product is the EuclideanP norm x = (x; x) = x2 . The inner product space (Rn; : ) is k k2 j=1 j k k a Hilbert space. p P  On normed linear spaces the primary objects of study are the linear operators and linear functionals which play central role in functional analysis.

De…nition 1.6. Let (X; : ) and (Y; : 0) be normed linear spaces over the same …eld F and k k k k T : X Y be a mapping. If T ( x + y) = T (x) + T (Y ) for all ; F and x; y X then T is called a7! linear operator. A linear operator T is called bounded if there is2 a real constant2 M > 0 such that T (x) 0 M x for all x X. If T is a bounded linear operator the number T = T = k k  k k 2 k kop k k

47 Ikonion Journal of Mathematics 2019, 1(2)

inf M : T (x) 0 M x for all x X is called a operator norm of T . The equivalent de…nition of operatork normk is givenk byk the formulas2  T (x) 0 T = T = sup k k : x = 0 = sup T (x) 0 : x 1 k kop k k x k k 6 k k k k   k k  = sup T (x) 0 : x = 1  k k k k The following is a very useful result for the computation of operator norms of linear operators.

Lemma 1.7. [Computation of operator norm] Let (X; : ) and (Y; : 0) be normed linear spaces k k k k over the same …eld F, T : X Y be a bounded linear operator and M 0 be a real constant. If for 7!  every x X, T (x) 0 M x and T (x0) 0 = M x0 for a vector x0 X 0 then the operator norm of 2T is kT =k M . k k k k k k 2 n f g k kop

Proof. If for every x X, T (x) 0 M x then by the de…nition of operator norm T M. 2 k k  k k k kop  On the other hand if for a vector x0 X 0 , T (x0) 0 = M x0 then by the de…nition of operator 2 n f g k k k k norm we have M x0 = T (x0) 0 T x0 so that M T . Therefore T = M. k k k k  k kop k k  k kop k kop Remark 1.8. We note that in the …nite dimensional case the operator norm can be computed by the method of Lagrange multipliers with constraints.

It is now a classical result that a linear operator is bounded if and only if it is continuous. The set (X;Y ) of bounded linear operators is a linear space over F with pointwise addition and scaler multi- B plication and : op is a norm on (X;Y ). If (Y; : 0) is a Banach space then the space ( (X;Y ); : op) is a Banach space.k k B k k B k k

A bounded linear operator f :(X; : ) (F; : ) is called a bounded linear functional. The k k 7! j j Banach space (X; : op) of bounded linear functional is called dual or conjugate space of the normed linear space (X; : k):k k k Example 1.9. Let (X; (:; :)) be an inner product space over the …eld F and a X be a …xed 2 vector. Then f :(X; : ) (F; : ); f(x) = (x; a) is a bounded linear functional and f = a : k k 7! j j k kop k k Linear functionals are important in terms of generating and characterizing linear subspaces. If (X; : ) is a normed linear space over the …eld F and ` : X F is a linear functional then the the kernelk k or the null space ker(`) = x X : `(x) = 0 of the linear7! functional ` is a linear subspace of X. It is well-known that a linearf functional2 is continuousg if and only if its null space is closed. On the other hand we have the following simple result which shows the relations between linear subspaces and linear functionals.

We recall that a linear subspace W of a linear space X is called a codimension one linear subspace if the dimension of the quotient space X W is dim(X W ) = 1. n n Lemma 1.10. Let (X; : ) be normed linear space over the …eld F. Then W is a codimension k k one linear subspace of the space X if and only if there is a linear functional ` : X F such that W = ker(`). 7!

Proof. Since the null space of a linear operator is a linear subspace if W = ker ` for a linear functional ` : X F, then W is a linear subspace of the space X. Conversely we assume that W is a 7! codimension one linear subspace of the space X. Let x0 X W be arbitrary and M = x0 : F 2 n f 2 g be the linear subspace of X generated by the vector x0. Then X = W M. Since each x X  2 has a unique representation of the form x = wx + xx0 where wx W and xx0 M the function 2 2 ` : X F; `(x) = `(wx + xx0) = x is a linear functional with ker(`) = W . 7! There are two fundamental results about bounded linear functionals, namely the Hahn-Banach theorem and the Riesz representation theorem. The Hahn-Banach theorem, one of the indispensable

48 Ikonion Journal of Mathematics 2019, 1(2) tools of modern analysis, play the central role in the investigation of geometric and analytic properties of bounded linear functionals. The Riesz representation theorem completely characterizes the bounded linear functionals on certain normed linear spaces. We state a version of each of these theorems that we need in what follows.

Theorem 1.11. [Hahn-Banach][2, 1, 7, 3] Let (X; : ) be normed linear space over the …eld F and k k W be a linear subspace of X. If f :(W; : ) (F; : ) is a bounded linear functional then there is a k k 7! j j bounded linear functional F :(X; : ) (F; : ) such that F W = f, that is for all x W; F (x) = f(x) and F = f : k k 7! j j j 2 k kop k kop Remark 1.12. The linear functional F is called a norm preserving linear functional extension of the linear functional f. The important and the di¢ cult part of the theorem is to get the norm preserving linear extension. Otherwise it is well-known that there are many linear extensions of f easy to construct.

Theorem 1.13. [Riesz representation theorem] [2, 5, 3, 7] Let (X; (:; :)) be a Hilbert space over the …eld F and : be the norm generated by the inner product. Then a function f :(X; : ) (F; : ) is a bounded lineark k functional if and only if there is a unique vector a X such that f(xk)k =7! (x; a) jforj all x X . Furthermore, the operator norm of the linear functional f2is f = a . 2 k kop k k Remark 1.14. By Lemma 1.10 and the Riesz representation theorem in a Hilbert space (X; (:; :)) a codimension one linear subspace W of the space X is of the form W = x X : `a(x) = (x; a) = 0 where a X is a …xed vector. f 2 g 2 On …nite dimensional normed linear spaces, the Riesz representation theorem provides more con- crete information about the structure of linear functionals. In this context, we state a version of the Riesz representation theorem for the …nite dimensional spaces and give its proof for the sake of completeness.

1 1 Theorem 1.15. [Riesz representation theorem] Let 1 p; q and p + q = 1. Then a n   1 function f :(R ; : p) (R; : ) is a bounded linear functional if and only if there is constant vector k kn 7! j j n a = (a1; : : : ; an) R such that f(x) = (x; a) = a1x1 + + anxn for every x R . Furthermore, the operator norm of2f is f = a .    2 k kop k kq n Proof. We …rst assume that for a constant vector a = (a1; : : : ; an) R and for every x = n 2 (x1; : : : ; xn) R f(x) = (x; a) = a1x1 + + anxn . Since the inner product is a linear functional with respect2 to the …rst variable it follows   that f is a linear functional. On the other hand we assume that f :(Rn; : ) (R; : ) is a linear functional. If f 0 then for the vector a = 0, f k kp 7! j j  is the required form f(x) = a1x1 + + anxn = (x; a): Therefore we may assume that f = 0. For    6 j = 1; 2; : : : ; n let ej = (0;:::; 0; 1; 0 :::; 0). The set = e1; : : : ; en is a standard (Hamel) basis of j B f g n n n the space R . Hence every vector x R has a unique representation of the form x = j=1 xjej. 2 n For j = 1; 2; : : : ; n let aj = f(ej). a = (a1; : : : ; an) R . Since f is a linear functional we have n n 2 P f(x) = xjf(ej) = xjaj = a1x1 + + anxn = (x; a). So f is the required form. j=1 j=1    For 1 p < and for each x Rn by the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality we have f(x) a x . P 1 P 2 j j  k kq k kp If p = then q = 1 and f(x) a 1 x = a q x p. Hence by the de…nition of operator norm 1 j j  k k k k1 k k k k f op a q. k k  k k q aj For 1 p < , if a = 0 we de…ne x (0) = 0, and if a = 0 we de…ne x (0) = j j and let j j j j aj  1 6 1 1 q q=p q q( p + q ) p x(0) = (x1(0); : : : ; xn(0)). Since x(0) p = a q and f(x(0)) = a q = a q = a q a q = a x(0) from the Lemma1.7k it followsk thatk k f =j a . j k k k k k k k k k kq k kp k kop k kq For p = , if aj 0 we de…ne xj(0) = 1 and if aj < 0 we de…ne xj(0) = 1 and let x(0) = 1  (x1(0); : : : ; xn(0)). Since x(0) = 1 and f(x(0)) = a 1 = a 1 x(0) from the Lemma 1.7 it follows that f = a .k Thereforek1 we havej f j= ak k for allk k1 k p k1 . k kop k k1 k kop k kq   1

49 Ikonion Journal of Mathematics 2019, 1(2)

2 Operator Norms and Extension of Linear Functionals

The Hahn-Banach theorem states that a bounded linear functional on a linear subspace of a normed linear space can be extended to the whole space without changing its operator norm. On the other hand, the Riesz representation theorem provides formulas both for the linear functional and its operator norm on a Hilbert space. But, as far as I know there is no such a formula for the operator norm of a linear functional de…ned on a linear subspace of a normed linear space.

By analyzing the orthogonal decomposition theorem and the Riesz representation theorem [5], [7](4.11 Theorem, 4.12 Theorem) we get two methods of the unique norm preserving linear extension of a linear functional de…ned on a closed linear subspace a Hilbert space. We note and state these methods without proofs.

Lemma 2.1. Let (X; (:; :)) be a Hilbert space over the …eld F, : be the norm generated k k by the inner product, W be a closed linear subspace of the space X and f :(W; : ) (F; : ) k k 7! j j be a nontrivial bounded linear functional. Let M = ker(f) be the null space of f and M ? = x W :(x; y) = 0 for all y M be the orthogonal complement of the space M in W . Choose any f 2 2 g f(x0) vector x0 M ? 0 and let a = 2 x0. Then f(x) = (x; a) for all x W , f = a and the norm x0 op 2 nf g k k 2 k k k k preserving linear extension of the functional f is the linear functional F :(X; : ) (F; : );F (x) = (x; a). k k 7! j j

Lemma 2.2. Let (X; (:; :)) be a Hilbert space over the …eld F, : be the norm generated by the k k inner product, W be a closed linear subspace of the space X and f :(W; : ) (F; : ) be a bounded linear functional. Let p : X W be the orthogonal projection of the spacekXk onto7! thej j space W . Then 7! F :(X; : ) (F; : );F (x) = f p(x) = f(p(x)) is the norm preserving linear functional extension of the functionalk k 7! f. j j 

The applications of these methods, without doubt, requires certain amount of work. In the case of a bounded linear functional de…ned on a codimension one subspace of a Hilbert space we provide simple formula both for the operator norm and for the norm preserving linear functional extension.

Theorem 2.3. [Formula for the operator norm and linear extension] Let (X; (:; :)) be a Hilbert space over the …eld F, : be the norm generated by the inner product, a; b X 0 be …xed vectors, k k 2 n f g W = x X : `b(x) = (x; b) = 0 be a linear subspace of the space X and fa :(W; : ) (F; : ), f 2 g k k 7! j j fa(x) = (x; a) be a linear functional. Then the operator norm of the linear functional fa is fa = k kop a (a;b) b = 1 a 2 b 2 (a; b) 2 and the norm preserving extension of the linear functional f b 2 b a k k k k k k k k j j is the linear functionalq F :(X; : ) ( ; : );F (x) = f (x) (a;b) ` (x) = x; a (a;b) b . F a b 2 b b 2 k k 7! j j k k k k   Proof. Since for each x W , `b(x) = 0 we have F (x) = fa(x). So the function F is an extension 2 of the function fa. By the Riesz representation theorems F is a linear functional on the space X and its operator norm is F = a (a;b) b . Since by the properties of the inner product k kop b 2 k k

(a; b) (a; b) (a; b) F = a b = a b; a b k kop b 2 b 2 b 2 s  k k k k k k 2 ( a; b) 2 (a; b) 2 b 2 = a 2 j j + j j k k sk k b 2 b 4 k k k k (a; b) 2 1 = a 2 j j = a 2 b 2 (a; b) 2 sk k b 2 b k k k k j j k k k kq

50 Ikonion Journal of Mathematics 2019, 1(2)

(a;b) it su¢ ces to show that fa = a 2 b . Since for x W , `b(x) = 0 by the Cauchy-Schwarz k kop b 2 inequality we have k k

(a; b) (a; b) fa(x) = fa(x) `b(x) = (x; a) (x; b) j j 2 2 b b k k k k (a; b) (a; b) = x; a b a b x : b 2  b 2 k k   k k k k

( a;b) By the de…nition of operator norm fa a 2 b . Since the equality holds in Cauchy-Schwarz k kop  b k k 2 inequality when x = a (a;b) b W and f a (a;b) b = a (a;b) b = a (a;b) b x it follows b 2 a b 2 b 2 b 2 k k 2 k k k k k k k k from the Lemma 1.7 that  

(a; b) 1 2 2 2 fa = a b = a b (a; b) : k kop 2 b k k k k j j b k k k kq

Remark 2.4. Since a = (a;b) b + a (a;b) b and a (a;b) b; b = 0, the vector a (a;b) b is the b 2 b 2 b 2 b 2 k k k k k k k k component of the vector a orthogonal to the vector b. This observation gives the following results.

Corollary 2.5. In Theorem 2.3, if the vectors a and b are orthogonal, that is (a; b) = 0 then the operator norm of the linear functional fa is fa = a and its norm preserving extension is the k kop k k linear functional F :(X; : ) (F; : );F (x) = fa(x). k k 7! j j Corollary 2.6. In Theorem 2.3., if the vectors a and b are collinear, that is b = ta for a scaler t F then fa 0, its operator norm fa = 0 and its norm preserving extension is the linear 2  k kop functional F :(X; : ) (F; : );F (x) = 0. k k 7! j j In the following result we assume that dim(Rn) = n 2.  n Corollary 2.7. Let a = (a1; a2; : : : ; an); b = (b1; b2; : : : ; bn) R 0 be …xed vectors, W = n 2 n f g x = (x1; x2; : : : ; xn) R : `b(x) = (x; b) = b1x1 + b2x2 + + bnxn = 0 be a linear subspace and f 2    g fa :(W; : ) (R; : ), fa(x) = (x; a) = a1x1 + a2x2 + + anxn be a linear functional. Then the k k2 7! j j    2 operator norm of the linear functional f is f = a 2 (a;b) = 1 a 2 b 2 (a; b)2 and its a a op 2 b 2 b 2 2 k k k k 2 k k2 k k k k r k k q norm preserving extension is the linear functional F :( n; : ) ( ; : );F (x) = f (x) (a;b) ` (x) = R 2 R a b 2 b k k 7! j j k k2 x; a (a;b) b . b 2 k k2   Remark 2.8. Since the computation of an operator norm is an extremum value problem we note that Corollary 2.7 may be used to solve certain type of extremum value problems.

3 Example 2.9. Let W = x = (x1; x2; x3) R : x1 + x2 + x3 = 0 be a linear subspace of the 3 2 space R . Find the operator norm of the linear functional f :(W; : ) (R; : ); f(x) = 2x1 + 3x3  k k2 7! j j and its norm preserving linear functional extension F :(R3; : ) (R; : ). k k2 7! j j 3 Solution. For the vectors b = (b1; b2; b3) = (1; 1; 1), a = (a1; a2; a3) = (2; 0; 3) R we have 3 2 W = x = (x1; x2; x3) R : `b(x) = (x; b) = x1 +x2 +x3 = 0 and f(x) = fa(x) = (x; a) = 2x1 +3x3. Since f(a; b) = 5, a 2= p13 and b = p3 by the Corollaryg 2.7 the operator norm of the linear k k2 k k2 functional f is f = 1 p39 25 = 14 = p42 and its norm preserving linear functional extension k kop p3 3 3 3 q (a;b) 5 1 is F :(R ; : 2) (R; : ) F (x) = fa(x) 2 `b(x) = 2x1 + 3x3 3 (x1 + x2 + x3) = 3 (x1 5x2 + 4x3). k k 7! j j b 2 We use Lemma 2.1 and Lemma 2.2 tok givek alternative solutions of this example.

51 Ikonion Journal of Mathematics 2019, 1(2)

Alternative solution. (W; : 2) is a Hilbert space. The kernel or the null space of the linear k k 1 2 functional f is the linear subspace M = ker(f) = 1; ; : R and its orthogonal com- 3 3 2 plement in W is the linear subspace M ? = (1; 5; 4) : R . Choose x0 = (1; 5; 4). and let f  2 g f(x0) 1 1 a = 2 x0 = (1; 5; 4). Then by Lemma 2.1 we have f(x) = (x; a) = (x1 5x2+4x3) for all x W . x0 3 3 k k2 2 p42 By the Riesz representation theorem f op = a 2 = 3 and by the uniqueness of extension the norm k k k k 3 preserving linear extension of the linear functional f is the linear functional F :(R ; : 2) (R; : ); 1 k k 7! j j F (x) = (x; a) = (x1 5x2 + 4x3). 3 Alternative solution 2. Since the space W is the kernel of the linear functional ` : R3 3 7! R; `(x) = x1 + x2 + x3 it is a closed codimension one linear subspace of R and hence dim W = 2. The orthogonal projection of the space R3 onto the space W is the bounded linear operator p : R3 W; 2x1 x2 x3 2x2 x1 x3 2x3 x2 x1 7! p(x) = 3 ; 3 ; 3 . So by Lemma 2.2 the norm preserving linear extension of the linear functional f is the linear functional F :(R3; : ) (R; : ),  k k2 7! j j

2x1 x2 x3 2x2 x1 x3 2x3 x2 x1 F (x) =f(p(x)) = f ; ; 3 3 3   2x1 x2 x3 2x3 x2 x1 =2 + 3 3 3     1 1 = (x1 5x2 + 4x3) = ((x1; x2; x3); (1; 5; 4)): 3 3

By the Riesz representation theorem f = F = 1 (1; 5; 4) = p42 : k kop k kop 3 2 3

We give a di¤erent solution of this example which is also important in terms of the method used.

Alternative solution 3. By the de…nition of operator norm combined probably with the method of Lagrange multipliers we have

f = sup f(x) : x = (x1; x2; x3) W; x = 1 k kop fj j 2 k k2 g 3 = sup 2x1 + 3x3 : x = (x1; x2; x3) R ; x1 + x2 + x3 = 0; x = 1 j j 2 k k2  p42 = sup 2x1 + 3x3 : x1; x3 0; x1 + x2 + x3 = 0; x = 1 = : f  k k2 g 3 By the Hahn-Banach theorem there is at least one norm preserving linear functional extension F of 3 f to the space (R ; : 2). By the Riesz representation theorem this extension is of the form F (x) = k k 3 (x; a) = a1x1 + a2x2 + a3x3 where a = (a1; a2; a3) R is a constant vector and F = a . For 2 k kop k k2 x W by solving the linear extension equality 2x1 + 3x3 = f(x) = F (x) = a1x1 + a2x2 + a3x3 and 2 p42 2 2 2 the operator norm equality 3 = f op = F op = a 2 = a1 + a2 + a3 simultaneously we get 1 5 4 k k k k k k a1 = 3 ; a2 = 3 and a3 = 3 . Therefore the unique norm preserving linear extension of the linear 1 p functional f is the linear functional F (x) = (x1 5x2 + 4x3). 3

Example 2.10. Let X = 3(R) be the linear space of all real functions of degree at P 1 most 3. The function (:; :): X X R de…ned by (p; q) = 1 p(x)q(x)dx is an inner product on  7! 1=2 1 2 X and it generates the norm p = (p; p) = 1(p(x)) dx R . The inner product space (X; (:; :)) k k 1   is a Hilbert space. Let W = p Xp: 1(p(x)R + xp(x))dx = 0 and ` :(W; : ) (R; : ); `(p) = f 2 g k k 7! j j 1 (p(x)+x2p(x))dx. Show that W is a linear subspace of X and ` is bounded linear functional. Find 1 R the operator norm of the functional ` and its norm preserving linear extension to the space X. R Solution. For the polynomial functions a : R R; a(x) = 1 + x2 and b : R R; b(x) = 1 + x we 1 7! 7!1 2 have W = p X : 1(p(x)+xp(x))dx = 0 = p X :(p; b) = 0 and `(p) = 1(p(x)+x p(x))dx = f 2 g f 2 g 1 (1 + x2)p(x)dx = (p; a). Since the inner product is a bounded linear functional with respect to the 1 R R R

52 Ikonion Journal of Mathematics 2019, 1(2)

…rst variable it follows that W is a closed codimension one linear subspace of the space X and ` is a bounded linear functional. Since

1 1=2 1 1=2 b = (b(x))2dx = (1 + x)2dx k k 1 1 Z  Z  1=2 2 t3 2p6 = t2dt = 2 = and 3 j0 3  0  r Z1 1 (a; b) = a(x)b(x)dx = (1 + x + x2 + x3)dx Z 1 Z 1 2 3 4 x x x 1 2 8 = x + + + 1= 2 + = ; 2 3 4 j 3 3   by the Theorem 2.3 the operator norm of the linear functional ` is

1=2 (a; b) 1 ` = a b = a b = (a(x) b(x))2dx k kop b 2 k k Z 1  k k 1 1=2 1 1=2 = (x2 x )2dx = (x4 2x3 + x2)dx 1 1 Z  Z  x5 2x4 x3 2 2 4p15 = + 1 = + = 5 4 3 j 1 5 3 15 s  r and its norm preserving linear functional extension is the linear functional L :(X; : ) (R; : ) de…ned by k k 7! j j

(a; b) L(p) = p; a b = (p; a b) b 2   1 k k 1 = (a(x) b(x))p(x)dx = (x2 x)p(x)dx: 1 1 Z Z

The following example shows that our formula works not just for …nite dimensional Hilbert spaces but also works for in…nite dimensional Hilbert spaces.

Example 2.11. Let X = L2([0; 1]) = f : f : [0; 1] R; Lebesque measurable and f 2 = 1=2 f 7! k k 1(f(x))2dx be the linear space of Lebesque integrable functions. The function (:; :): 0 g 1 XR X R de…ned by (f; g) = f(x)g(x)dx is an inner product on X and it generates the norm  7! 0 f = f . Let W = f X : 1 f(x)dx = 0 and ` :(W; : ) ( ; : ); `(f) = 1 x2f(x)dx. Show 2 R0 R 0 thatk k Wk isk a linear subspacef 2 of X and ` is boundedg linear functionalk k 7! onj jW . Find the operator norm R R of the functional ` and its norm preserving linear extension to the space X.

Solution. For the functions a : [0; 1] R; a(x) = x2 and b : [0; 1] R; b(x) = 1 we have 1 7! 1 2 7! W = f X : 0 f(x)dx = 0 = f X :(f; b) = 0 and `(f) = 0 x f(x)dx = (f; a). Since the innerf product2 is a bounded linearg functionalf 2 with respectg to the …rst variable it follows that W is a R R codimension one linear subspace of the space X and ` is a bounded linear functional. Since b = 1=2 1=2 3 k k 1(b(x))2dx = 1 12dx = x 1 = 1 and (a; b) = 1 a(x)b(x)dx = 1 x2dx = x 1= 1 by 0 0 j0 0 0 3 j0 3 R  R  p R R

53 Ikonion Journal of Mathematics 2019, 1(2) the Theorem 2.3 the operator norm of the linear functional ` is

1=2 (a; b) b 1 b(x) 2 ` op = a 2 b = a = a(x) dx k k b 3 0 3 ! k k Z   1= 2 1 2 1 1=2 1 2 1 = x2 dx = x4 x2 + dx 3 3 9 Z0   ! Z0    x5 2 1 1 2 1 = x3 + x 1 = + 0 5 9 9 j0 5 9 9 s  s  9 5 4 2 2p5 = = = = 9 5 9 5 3p5 15 r  r  and its norm preserving linear functional extension is the linear functional L :(X; : ) (R; : );L(p) = k k 7! j j f; a (a;b) b = p; a b = 1(a(x) b(x))f(x)dx = 1 x2 1 f(x)dx. b 2 3 0 0 3 k k    R R  We end the paper with the following question.

Question. Can we remove the codimension one hypothesis in Theorem 2.3? Is it possible to generalize these results to normed linear spaces under some smoothness conditions.

References

[1] B. Beauzam¬, Introduction to Banach Spaces and Their Geometry, North Holland Publishing Com. Inc., Amsterdam, 1982.

[2] Béla Bollobás, Linear Anaysis, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1990.

[3] J. B. Conway, A Course in Functional Analysis, second ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990.

[4] A. N. Kolmogorov & S. V. Fomin, Introductory Real Analysis, Dover Publications, New York, 1970.

[5] R. Larsen, Functional anaysis, M. Dekker, New York, 1973.

[6] L. Narici, E. Beckenstein, The Hahn-Banach theorem: the lifes and times, Topology and its Ap- plications 77(1997), 193-211

[7] W. Rudin, Real and , McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1987.

54