Voyeurism and Gendered Violence in Tomson Highwayâ•Žs Dry Lips
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Laurier Undergraduate Journal of the Arts Volume 4 Article 3 10-25-2017 Voyeurism and Gendered Violence in Tomson Highway’s Dry Lips Oughta Move to Kapuskasing and Griselda Gambaro’s Information for Foreigners Erica Parnis Wilfrid Laurier University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholars.wlu.ca/luja Part of the Feminist, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Commons, and the Literature in English, North America, Ethnic and Cultural Minority Commons Recommended Citation Parnis, Erica. "Voyeurism and Gendered Violence in Tomson Highway’s Dry Lips Oughta Move to Kapuskasing and Griselda Gambaro’s Information for Foreigners." Laurier Undergraduate Journal of the Arts 4 (2017) : -. Print. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Laurier Undergraduate Journal of the Arts by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Parnis: Voyeurism and Gendered Violence in Dry Lips Oughta Move to Kapuskasing Voyeurism and Gendered Violence in Tomson Highway’s Dry Lips Oughta Move to Kapuskasing and Griselda Gambaro’s Information for Foreigners Erica Parnis Canadian playwright Tomson Highway’s Dry Lips Oughta Move to Kapuskasing is one of the best-known works of Indigenous theatre. It also contains one of the most controversial scenes: Dickie Bird Halked’s brutal rape of Cree trickster Nanabush, taking the form of Patsy “Big-Bum” Pegahmagahbow. Highway intended this vio- lence to be symbolic—by juxtaposing the play’s comedy and its disturbing con- tent, the playwright sought to present a critique of gendered and colonial violence. Yet, as many Indigenous women have criticized, the eschewing of positive female representations in favour of demeaning tropes only serves to perpetuate the char- acters’ misogyny and violence (Baker 88). The rape scene in Dry Lips exemplifies the concept of emblematic sexual violence, a term I use to describe the dramatic practice of performing gendered violence or rape to symbolize national or cultural violation. While this concept is not limited to theatre, the innate physicality and proximity of the stage simulates a mutual exchange between viewer and performer and makes the performance of violence especially worthy of critique. The close- ness of theatre also makes it more prone to voyeurism and sensationalism when portraying violence. Using sexual violence as a symbol risks confining the act to the realm of fiction, and this forces critics to ask: Is performing sexual violence an effective method of combatting it? I explore the complexities of this question in two productions: Tomson Highway’s Dry Lips and Griselda Gambaro’s Information for Foreigners. Both use representations of sexual violence to criticize cultural and national corruption and communicate a political agenda. Where they differ, however, is in their implications. Dry Lips is a dangerous misstep in the use of emblematic sexual violence; Highway risks divorcing the act of rape from reality, confining it to the comical dream world. Audiences are encouraged to act as voyeurs, people who consume representations of gendered violence while remaining passive and inactive. Furthermore, Highway relies on the fetishistic trope that equates Indigenous women’s bodies with the earth and uses rape to symbolize colonial violence—a concept with its roots in the oppressive colonial forces Highway sought to deconstruct. Gambaro’s Information Published by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 2017 1 Laurier Undergraduate Journal of the Arts, Vol. 4 [2017], Art. 3 6 LUJA for Foreigners, however, avoids voyeurism, and through her work I would like to assert that the counteractive element to voyeurism is the indictment of the audience. Gambaro does not perpetuate passivity because her staging choices and use of audi- ence participation actively condemn both the violent acts and audiences’ voyeuristic consumption of them. In short, although both of these plays use emblematic sexual violence to communicate their politics, Highway’s choices run the risk of demateri- alizing the experience of rape and facilitating passive, inactive viewing. Gambaro, however, encourages viewers to engage with the play as critics, evaluating their role as bystanders and recognizing the effects of passive voyeurism. Tomson Highway is an Indigenous Canadian writer most famous for his unfinished Rez heptalogy. Dry Lips is the second of these plays, all of which are set on the fictional Wasaychigan Reserve. They deal with similar themes, including the cultural impact of colonialism, misogynistic violence, and the introduction of Western gender roles and religion to Indigenous populations. Highway believes that gendered violence resulting from colonialism must be eliminated and attempts, through his work, “to prevent this kind of thing from happening to another Native woman” (Highway qtd. in Coté 15). Yet his plays have another aspect in common: nearly all of his plays use gendered violence to symbolize the “cultural, territorial, and spiritual dispossession brought about by colonialism” (MacKenzie 2). Dry Lips’ Nanabush is portrayed as an exaggerated vision of Western femininity—as Gazelle Nataway, she has enormous breasts, and as Patsy, she has a comically large rear. Along with the rape scene, there is a stripper scene, as well as a moment where a hockey puck gets stuck between Gazelle’s breasts. As William Worthen identifies in his introduction to the play, her physical appearance is reminiscent of the highly problematic “squaw” stereotype of a highly sexualized Indigenous woman (1682). Throughout the play, Nanabush is a figure of absurd physical comedy, and this has repercussions for how the disturbing rape scene can be interpreted. In Cree legend, Nanabush is a genderless trickster and teacher figure who uses humour to teach lessons. Although in Dry Lips Highway maintains Nanbush’s role as a trickster, he also writes her as a feminine, highly sexualized Indigenous woman. As such, her rape is meant to communicate the cost of gendered and colonial violence. The fact that she is penetrated with a cross is intended to mirror the violation of Native spirituality by Christianity. Yet, the characters are never taught this lesson, and they never interact with Nanabush’s true form because she is a spirit. It is later revealed that the entire play was a dream, and the misogyny described is a reflection of the men’s attitudes brought on by a cycle of colonialism, just as Dickie Bird’s actions are explained by his being born with fetal alcohol syndrome. Audiences, are encouraged to see gendered violence not as an individual issue but as a legacy http://scholars.wlu.ca/luja/vol4/iss1/3 2 Parnis: Voyeurism and Gendered Violence in Dry Lips Oughta Move to Kapuskasing PARNIS 7 of colonialism. By using rape as a literary device in a symbolic dream, Highway perpetuates the objectification of women and the problematic depiction of female bodies as objects of conquest. Highway’s Dry Lips represents an important step forward in the perfor- mance of Indigenous political activism, but his methods are questionable. We cannot consider his works wholly subversive when he relies on tropes that perpetuate not only sexism and rape culture but also racist stereotypes. As MacKenzie points out, Highway’s recurring use of rape as a metaphor for colonial violence perpetuates derogatory stereotypes of Indigenous women that have their roots in the legacy of colonialism (8). In Imperial Leather, Anne McClintock brings this trope to light, highlighting the sexist undertones of colonial narratives that designate the earth and its land as female and vulnerable to forced “penetration” by masculine colonizers (26). This harmful trope reinforces ideas of Indigenous women as submissive and vulnerable objects rather than individuals with agency. As critic Ric Knowles emphasizes, Dry Lips equates penetration and rape with imperialism, which “risk[s] dematerializing the experience of their female subjects by metaphorically representing the effects of Christianity and colonization on Native spirituality through rape” (140). He also concludes that violence against women functions to “maintain gender hierarchies” and “perpetuate rape … as the gendered and raced technologies of colonialism” (151). Furthermore, Highway’s representation of rape is especially dangerous when we consider that Indigenous women are three times more likely to suffer from domestic violence and rape than white women and are less likely to report their experiences (Brownridge 164; Mack- enzie 9). In spite of this, some scholars have argued that Nanabush’s presence as trickster figure “actually refuses the power of rape by subsuming it within the myth- ological frameworks invoked” (Gilbert and Tompkins 215). Such explanations seek to justify the use of emblematic rape by placing it within the context of Indigenous authenticity and revival of traditional Indigenous stories. Yet this surreal element is complicated by the observation that Highway’s scene resembles real-life incidents of Indigenous rape in the 1960s and 70s (Pearson 175). Although some critics have attempted to reimagine Nanabush’s rape as a metaphor rooted in Indigenous magic, Knowles emphasizes that “the sign marks the absence of the material referent” and that emblematizing rape “risks effacing … its lived, material reality for the women who are its victims” (141). Highway’s representation of sexual violence reflects real issues with real consequences,