NWLP-06-06-08.Pdf (7.901Mb)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ellen Rosenblum Sworn in As Attorney General 1989 -2012 T the Oregon State Capitol, Ellen Rosenblum Was Sworn in As Attorney General of Oregon on June 29
Published Quarterly by Oregon Women Lawyers Volume 23, No. 3 Summer 2012 23 years of breaking barriers Ellen Rosenblum Sworn In as Attorney General 1989 -2012 t the Oregon State Capitol, Ellen Rosenblum was sworn in as attorney general of Oregon on June 29. AGovernor John Kitzhaber had appointed her to the office, vacated by John Kroger. She is the first woman to President serve as Oregon’s attorney general. Megan Livermore Governor Kitzhaber welcomed the overflowing crowd Vice President, President-Elect of Ellen’s friends, colleagues, and family, and the press, Kathleen J. Rastetter and introduced Oregon’s first female governor, Barbara Secretary Kendra Matthews Roberts. Following Governor Roberts was Justice Virginia Linder, the first woman to win a seat on the Oregon Su- Treasurer Laura Craska Cooper preme Court through a contested election. Both women Historian observed the historic nature of this appointment. Elizabeth Tedesco Milesnick After being sworn in by Governor Kitzhaber, Ellen said that she would lead the Department of Justice “so that Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum (left) Board Members and Justice Virginia Linder on June 29 Allison Boomer Oregon’s interests are represented at the highest level of Hon. Frances Burge ethics, professionalism, and devotion to public service.” Megan Burgess Gina Eiben Following the swearing-in ceremony was a public reception at the Mission Mill Dye House in Dana Forman Salem, where hundreds gathered to congratulate our new attorney general. Heather L. Weigler, Amber Hollister OWLS’ past president and Ellen’s campaign manager during the primary campaign, introduced her. Jaclyn Jenkins Angela Franco Lucero “Ellen isn’t motivated by what’s right for her; she’s motivated by what’s right for all of us. -
STAYING the PROCEEDING Defendants
Case 1:21-cv-00462-JPO Document 35 Filed 04/27/21 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 21 Civ. 462 (JPO) v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL STIPULATION AND CONSENT PROTECTION AGENCY, et ano., ORDER FURTHER STAYING THE PROCEEDING Defendants. WHEREAS, on or about January 19, 2021, the State of New York, State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Illinois, State of Maine, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, People of the State of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of New Jersey, State of New Mexico, State of North Carolina, State of Oregon, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Vermont, State of Washington, State of Wisconsin, King County Washington, City of Chicago, and City of New York (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint in the above-captioned matter (the “Complaint”) against the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency1 (collectively, “Defendants” or “EPA”); WHEREAS, the Complaint seeks, inter alia, a declaration that the final rule entitled “Strengthening Transparency in Pivotal Science Underlying Significant Regulatory Actions and Influential Scientific Information,” 86 Fed. Reg. 469 (Jan. 6, 2021) (“Final Rule”), is in excess of 1 Administrator Michael S. Regan is automatically substituted in place of former Administrator Andrew R. Wheeler pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). Case 1:21-cv-00462-JPO Document 35 Filed 04/27/21 Page 2 of 9 EPA’s statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations; is not in accordance with law; and is arbitrary and capricious; and vacatur of the Final Rule; WHEREAS, on February 1, 2021, the United States District Court for the District of Montana ordered that the “Final Rule is hereby vacated and remanded to the Environmental Protection Agency,” Envt’l Def. -
VAWA”) Has Shined a Bright Light on Domestic Violence, Bringing the Issue out of the Shadows and Into the Forefront of Our Efforts to Protect Women and Families
January 11, 2012 Dear Members of Congress, Since its passage in 1994, the Violence Against Women Act (“VAWA”) has shined a bright light on domestic violence, bringing the issue out of the shadows and into the forefront of our efforts to protect women and families. VAWA transformed the response to domestic violence at the local, state and federal level. Its successes have been dramatic, with the annual incidence of domestic violence falling by more than 50 percent1. Even though the advancements made since in 1994 have been significant, a tremendous amount of work remains and we believe it is critical that the Congress reauthorize VAWA. Every day in this country, abusive husbands or partners kill three women, and for every victim killed, there are nine more who narrowly escape that fate2. We see this realized in our home states every day. Earlier this year in Delaware, three children – ages 12, 2 ½ and 1 ½ − watched their mother be beaten to death by her ex-boyfriend on a sidewalk. In Maine last summer, an abusive husband subject to a protective order murdered his wife and two young children before taking his own life. Reauthorizing VAWA will send a clear message that this country does not tolerate violence against women and show Congress’ commitment to reducing domestic violence, protecting women from sexual assault and securing justice for victims. VAWA reauthorization will continue critical support for victim services and target three key areas where data shows we must focus our efforts in order to have the greatest impact: • Domestic violence, dating violence, and sexual assault are most prevalent among young women aged 16-24, with studies showing that youth attitudes are still largely tolerant of violence, and that women abused in adolescence are more likely to be abused again as adults. -
Crime Victims United Sends Letter to Candidates Challenging Corrections Myths
CRIMECRIME VICTIMSVICTIMS UNITEDUNITED P.O. Box 1896, Lake Oswego, OR 97035 • www.crimevictimsunited.org • [email protected] Dear Candidate: July 29, 2010 There is a disturbing amount of misleading information in the media these days about corrections in Oregon. A recent Register-Guard op ed1 repeated the dubious assertion that Oregon "now ranks No. 1 in the country in the percentage of general fund dollars spent on prisons." This is presented as evidence of "over-reliance on incarceration." According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, in 2008 Oregon ranked 30th in incarceration rate.2 How can Oregon rank number 1 in spending when we rank number 30 in incarceration rate? A member of the Oregon Criminal Justice Commission (OCJC) wrote in a May 25th Oregonian op ed3: "Measure 11 specifies certain crimes – from murder to second-degree robbery – carry a mandatory sentence. It applies to all defendants over the age of 15, requiring juveniles over 15 charged with these crimes to be tried as adults. The sentencing judge cannot give a lesser sentence than that prescribed by Measure 11." Pursuant to SB 1049 (1997) and HB 2379 (2001), bills supported by Crime Victims United, judges have discretion to depart from Measure 11 under certain circumstances.4 OCJC data shows that, in 2007, 40 percent of adult criminals and 55 percent of juveniles convicted of second-degree Measure 11 crimes received sentences below the Measure 11 mandatory minimum.5,6 In his June 25th speech7 on resetting government, Governor Kulongoski said: "Changes in sentencing policies since the mid-1990s, including the adoption of Measure 11, have doubled our prison population from 7,000 to more than 14,000 inmates. -
Table 4.19 the ATTORNEYS GENERAL, 2014
ATTORNEYS GENERAL Table 4.19 THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, 2014 Length of Number of Maximum State or other Method of regular term Date of Present previous consecutive jurisdiction Name and party selection in years first service term ends terms terms allowed Alabama .................... Luther Strange (R) E 4 1/2011 1/2015 0 2 Alaska ........................ Michael Geraghty (R) A . 2/1/2012 . 0 . Arizona ...................... Tom Horne (R) E 4 1/2011 1/2015 0 2 Arkansas .................... Dustin McDaniel (D) E 4 1/2007 1/2015 1 2 California .................. Kamala Harris (D) E 4 1/2011 1/2015 0 2 Colorado .................... John W. Suthers (R) E 4 1/2005 (a) 1/2015 1 (a) 2 Connecticut ............... George Jepsen (D) E 4 1/2011 1/2015 0 ★ Delaware ................... Joseph R. Biden III (D) E 4 1/2007 1/2015 1 ★ Florida ....................... Pam Bondi (R) E 4 1/2011 1/2015 0 2 Georgia ...................... Sam Olens (R) E 4 1/2011 1/2015 0 ★ Hawaii........................ David Louie (D) A 4 (b) 1/2011 12/2014 0 . Idaho .......................... Lawrence Wasden (R) E 4 1/2003 1/2015 2 ★ Illinois ........................ Lisa Madigan (D) E 4 1/2003 1/2015 2 ★ Indiana ....................... Greg Zoeller (R) E 4 1/2009 1/2017 1 ★ Iowa ........................... Tom Miller (D) E 4 1/1979 (c) 1/2015 7 (c) ★ Kansas ....................... Derek Schmidt (R) E 4 1/2011 1/2015 0 ★ Kentucky ................... Jack Conway (D) E 4 12/2007 12/2015 1 2 Louisiana ................... James D. Caldwell (D) E 4 1/2008 1/2016 1 ★ Maine ......................... Janet T. Mills (D) L (d) 2 1/2013 1/2015 1 (m) 4 Maryland .................. -
See the #Nsgscon 2019 Program
#NATSECGIRLSQUAD: THE CONFERENCE 11-12 December 2019 Washington Marriott Wardman Park Hotel Accessible & Aspirational Contents Rooms to Know Agenda Speakers List FAQ Partners Agenda Rooms to Know Agenda Speakers List FAQ #NSGSCon 2019 Partners Rooms To Know Plenary Room Marshall Ballroom Exhibits Marshall Foyers Lifestyle Lounge Marshall Atrium Media Room Hoover Green Room Jefferson Childcare Room Johnson Career Lounge Madison Breakout Rooms Taft; Taylor; Truman; Tyler Wednesday, December 11 2019 0800 Check-In/Coffee (Coffee provided by: American University School of Public Affairs) Marshall Foyer 0820 State of the Squad with Maggie Feldman-Piltch, #NSGS Founder Marshall Ballroom 0855 Introduction and #NatSecGirlSquad Tech Challenge Announcement John Saad, Guidehouse 0900 Fireside Chat Myths, Realities, Challenges, and Opportunities: The Real Story of Talent Acquisition and Human Capital Management in NatSec. Marshall Ballroom ● Terri Randall, Deputy Director of Talent Acquisition - CIA ● Erin G. Reitkopp, Human Capital Program Manager, Right Trusted Agile Workforce Initiative - ODNI ● John Kroger, Chief Learning Office - Navy ● Tish Tucker, Director at Office of Defense - NGA ● Moderator: Maggie Feldman-Piltch, #NatSecGirlSquad 1000 Administrative Overview Marshall Ballroom ● Paul Kearney, #NatSecGirlSquad and US Army 1010 Breakout Session One: 1a. Design Thinking/Problem Solving with MITRE Innovation Toolkit Team Jessica Yu and Jen Choi Tyler Room 1b. Personal Branding for Silent Professionals with John Sipher - CIA, DO retired; Joseph Gartin- Chief Learning Officer, CIA retired; Roynda Hartsfield, Digital Hiring Directorate, CIA retired Truman Room 1c. How to Brief Well with Phil Walter, Divergent Options and #NatSecGirlSquad Board Member Taylor Room 1d. Introduction to Model Diplomacy with CFR World 101 Taft Room All mainstage conversations are on the record. -
January/February 2010
HEDDA LITWIN, PROJECT COUNSEL & EDITOR JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2010 The Cyber Crime Newsletter is developed under TABLE OF CONTENTS the Cyber Crime Training Partnership between the National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) FEATURES………………………………………………1 and the National Center for Justice and the Rule of AG’S FIGHTING CYBERCRIME…….………….3 Law (NCJRL) at the University of Mississippi School IN THE COURTS……………………………………..8 of Law. It is written and edited by Hedda Litwin, SUPREME COURT NEWS.……..……….……….11 Cyberspace Law Counsel ([email protected], 202- LEGISLATIVE NEWS……….……………………..11 326-6022). NEWS YOU CAN USE…………………..….……..12 This project is supported by grants provided by TOOLS YOU CAN USE…………...…….…….…..14 the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau of FREE TRAINING.……………………………….....15 Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which includes the Bureau of like to feature articles written by you. Please con- Justice Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, tact us with information, proposed articles and com- the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency ments about this newsletter. Thank you. Prevention, and the Office of Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the authors and do not represent the offi- SUPREME COURT TAKES 4TH cial position of the United States Department of Jus- tice. AMENDMENT TEXTING CASE The views and opinions of authors expressed in this newsletter do not necessarily state or reflect The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to decide those of the National Association of Attorneys whether a police department violated the constitu- General (NAAG). This newsletter does not provide tional privacy rights of an employee when it in- any legal advice and is not a substitute for the spected personal text messages sent and received procurement of such services from a legal on a government pager. -
Are Charter Schools the Second Coming of Enron?: an Examination
Indiana Law Journal Volume 93 Issue 4 Article 5 Winter 2018 Are Charter Schools the Second Coming of Enron?: An Examination of the Gatekeepers that Protect Against Dangerous Related-Party Transactions in the Charter School Sectors Preston C. Green III University of Connecticut - Storrs, [email protected] Bruce D. Baker Rutgers University, [email protected] Joseph O. Oluwole Montclair State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Education Law Commons, Law and Economics Commons, and the Securities Law Commons Recommended Citation Green, Preston C. III; Baker, Bruce D.; and Oluwole, Joseph O. (2018) "Are Charter Schools the Second Coming of Enron?: An Examination of the Gatekeepers that Protect Against Dangerous Related-Party Transactions in the Charter School Sectors," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 93 : Iss. 4 , Article 5. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol93/iss4/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Are Charter Schools the Second Coming of Enron?: An Examination of the Gatekeepers That Protect Against Dangerous Related-Party Transactions in the Charter School Sector⃰ PRESTON C. GREEN,IIIa BRUCE D. BAKERb JOSEPH O. OLUWOLEc INTRODUCTION................................................................................................... -
Fall 2006 Advocate.Revised
Fall 2006 TheADVOCATE Lewis & Clark Law School Inside: Rising Costs of Legal Education A Commitment to Public Service A Legacy of Scholarship Contents Board of Visitors Mark Tratos ’79 Features 2006-07 Isao Tom Tsuruta ’89 Professor Thomas Ambrose ’75 Adele Waller ’85 Meeting the Rising Costs of Legal Larry Amburgey ’75 Dennis Whittlesey Education . 3 Professor Stephen Dow Beckham Steven Wildish ’85 A Legacy of Scholarship . 7 Bowen Blair Jr. ’80 Michael Williams Brian Booth Lawrence Wilson ’75 Bryan Scott ’91: A Commitment Monte Bricker Russell Winner to Public Service . 15 Thomas Brown ’80 Hon. Alex Bryner Alumni Board of Directors Why Jessup Moot Court Matters . 17 David Case 2006-07 The Commerce Clause Keith Coe ’85 Shareefah Adbdullah ’96 in Gonzales V. Raich . 18 Jonathan Cole ’76 Janet Noelle Billups ’79 Bruce Crocker ’76 Thomas Bittner ’89 Tom Miller ’01: Riding Jeff Curtis ’86 William Brunner ’53 at the Law . 22 John DesCamp Jr. ’74 Adam Cornell ’01 Stephen Doherty ’84 Raymond Crutchley ’99 Contributions Report . insert Barnes Ellis Gilion Dumas ’92 David Ernst ’85 Adina Flynn ’96 Lawyers With Families Maintain M. Carr Ferguson Hon. Dennis Hubel ’76 a Delicate Balance. 25 Paul Fortino Craig Jacobson ’95 Hon. Julie Frantz ’75 Hon. Edward Jones ’75 Departments Edwin Harnden John Kodachi ’92, Vice President Steven Hopp ’75 Krista Koehl ’99 Law School News . 26 James Hubler ’72 Donna Maddux ’02 Faculty and Staff News . 40 Judith Johansen ’83 Richard Maizels ’66 Class Notes . 45 Elizabeth Johnson ’77 Doreen Margolin ’81, President Jack Kennedy ’51 Connie McKelvey ’83 In Memoriam . -
Portland-Tribune-030414.Pdf
EDITION GREATER PORTLAND PortlandTribuneTUESDAY, MARCHo 4, r t l a n2014 • dPORTLANDTRIBUNE.COM • PUBLISHED TUESDAY AND THURSDAY This poll takes a deeper look at the values HOW LIBERAL we all hold DHM Research, Pamplin Media nd common ground in Oregonians’ IS PORTLAND? desire for better state By ADAM DAVIS, DHM RESEARCH TRIBUNE FILE PHOTOS: CHRISTOPHER ONSTOTT For The Tribune Members of the Occupy Portland movement took over part of downtown in mid-October 2011, with many dressed in Guy Fawkes masks from the 2005 movie “V for Vendetta.” But that does not mean Portland is at odds with the rest of the region and state on every issue. To the contrary, the poll fi nds a Beginning today, DHM Research lot of common ground among most Oregonians. For example, 94 percent of Portlanders believe taxes are necessary to pay for the common good. A joins Pamplin Media Group to share signifi cant 86 percent in the region and 85 percent in the state agree. with Portland-area residents the re- sults of the 2013 Oregon Values and Beliefs Study. In the weeks and months ahead, you will learn how Oregonians ■ This ain’t ‘Portlandia,’ but it sure feels like it, according to a feel about a variety of issues, ranging from the economy Now is the survey highlighting the Rose City’s very lefty political leanings and the environ- ment to health care moment to and support for the veryone knows Portland is more lib- disadvantaged. give voice eral than the rest of the region and Story by Jim Redden It has been the the state. -
NWLP-04-04-08.Pdf (4.544Mb)
See Inside MEETINGMEETING NOTICESNOTICES Page 6 Volume 109 Number 7 April 4, 2008 Portland Schrader, Kroger garner AFL-CIO endorsements John Kroger was endorsed by the Oregon AFL-CIO’s Committee on Politi- cal Education (COPE) to be the state’s next attorney general, and State Sen. Kurt Schrader was picked to succeed Darlene Hooley in Congress. Delegates met March 27 in Northeast Portland to discuss races in the May 20 primary. To endorse a candidate requires a two-thirds majority vote of delegates. Earlier this year, the Oregon AFL-CIO endorsed Jeff Merkley in the Democ- ratic primary for U.S. Senate and Ben Westlund for State Treasurer. Merkley is facing Steve Novick in the Democratic primary, with the winner taking on Re- publican incumbent Gordon Smith. Westlund is unopposed. Three Democratic state senators vying for secretary of state will fight it out in the primary without an endorsement from the AFL-CIO. The state labor fed- eration took no action in the race between Rick Metzger, Vicki Walker and Kate Brown. A motion just to consider endorsing in the race failed to get enough votes to proceed. Kroger, a Lewis & Clark Law School professor and a former federal prose- cutor, is in a heated battle with Lake Oswego State Rep. Greg Macpherson in Responding to solar demand the Democratic primary. The four-term incumbent, Democrat Hardy Myers, is In response to an increase in demand for trained solar electricians, the NECA-IBEW Local 280 training center retiring, and no Republican has filed for the post, which means the winner of the in Tangent is conducting additional 16-hour solar installation classes for journeymen electricians. -
United States V. City of Portland, Civil Action No
Case: 16-73878, 12/09/2016, ID: 10227894, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 1 of 26 Case No. ________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE CITY OF PORTLAND, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, Respondent and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PORTLAND POLICE ASSOCIATION, and ALBINA MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE COALITION FOR JUSTICE AND POLICE REFORM, Respondents-Real Parties in Interest. From the United States District Court For the District of Oregon, Portland Division, The Hon. Michael H. Simon Case No. 3:12-cv-02265-SI PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS AND FOR REASSIGNMENT ON REMAND TRACY REEVE City Attorney Office of City Attorney 1221 SW Fourth Ave., Rm. 430 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone No.: (503) 823-4047 Facscimile No.: (503) 823-3089 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Petitioner Case: 16-73878, 12/09/2016, ID: 10227894, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 2 of 26 PRAYER FOR RELIEF The City of Portland invokes the supervisory authority of this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), FRAP 21, and Ninth Circuit Rule 21-2, and prays for a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the District of Oregon: (a) to withdraw its Order setting a further Status Conference in United States of America v. City of Portland, United States District Court (Oregon) No. 3:12-cv-02265-SI (ER-300); (b) to schedule or hold no more than one Status Conference in any calendar year, unless either the United States of America or the City of Portland invokes the breach provisions of their