DOCSLIB.ORG

United States V. City of Portland, Civil Action No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United States V. City of Portland, Civil Action No Case: 16-73878, 12/09/2016, ID: 10227894, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 1 of 26 Case No. ________________ UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE CITY OF PORTLAND, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, Respondent and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PORTLAND POLICE ASSOCIATION, and ALBINA MINISTERIAL ALLIANCE COALITION FOR JUSTICE AND POLICE REFORM, Respondents-Real Parties in Interest. From the United States District Court For the District of Oregon, Portland Division, The Hon. Michael H. Simon Case No. 3:12-cv-02265-SI PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS, FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS AND FOR REASSIGNMENT ON REMAND TRACY REEVE City Attorney Office of City Attorney 1221 SW Fourth Ave., Rm. 430 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone No.: (503) 823-4047 Facscimile No.: (503) 823-3089 Email: [email protected] Attorney for Petitioner Case: 16-73878, 12/09/2016, ID: 10227894, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 2 of 26 PRAYER FOR RELIEF The City of Portland invokes the supervisory authority of this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), FRAP 21, and Ninth Circuit Rule 21-2, and prays for a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the District of Oregon: (a) to withdraw its Order setting a further Status Conference in United States of America v. City of Portland, United States District Court (Oregon) No. 3:12-cv-02265-SI (ER-300); (b) to schedule or hold no more than one Status Conference in any calendar year, unless either the United States of America or the City of Portland invokes the breach provisions of their Settlement Agreement, and then only to the extent provided in the Settlement Agreement, and without testimony or comment on the record from members of the public; or, in the alternative (c) to vacate its Amended Order Entering Settlement Agreement, Conditionally Dismissing Litigation, And Setting First Annual Status Conference, and to enter an Order Entering the Settlement Agreement and Conditionally Dismissing Litigation, without providing for or scheduling any further status conferences; and 1 Case: 16-73878, 12/09/2016, ID: 10227894, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 3 of 26 (d) to take such other measures as, in the judgment of this Court, will secure to the City of Portland the benefit of its bargain in the Settlement Agreement and in settlement of the prior appeal in this matter, in United States of America v. City of Portland, Ninth Circuit No. 14-35903. In order to allow this Court to consider the City’s petition, the City further moves for an Order staying the District Court’s Order setting an interim status conference for Tuesday, January 31, 2017 (ER-300). Finally, the City moves the Court, in its supervisory capacity, to direct the reassignment of this matter to a different District Judge on remand. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED This case involves a Settlement Agreement entered into between the United States of America and the City of Portland, Oregon, to resolve a claim made by the United States under 42 USC § 14141, and denied by the City of Portland, that the City, through its Portland Police Bureau, has a policy or practice of depriving persons suffering from mental illness, or perceived to be suffering from mental illness, of their federally protected Constitutional rights by subjecting such persons to excessive force. The issue is whether the District Court has abused its authority or committed legal error by exceeding the limited scope of its jurisdiction to 2 Case: 16-73878, 12/09/2016, ID: 10227894, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 4 of 26 enforce the Settlement Agreement at the request of one or the other of the parties, has entangled itself inappropriately in the operation of a municipal police department, and has deprived the City of Portland of the benefit of its bargain with the United States. 2. STATEMENT OF THE FACTS In 2010, Aaron Campbell, an unarmed black man experiencing a mental health crisis, was shot and killed by a Portland Police Bureau (PPB) officer.1 In the aftermath of that tragedy, Portland’s then-Mayor Sam Adams and then- Police Commissioner Dan Saltzman invited the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) to investigate the PPB and make recommendations for improvement of its policies and procedures. DOJ conducted a lengthy review of police use of force in Portland, and issued a report asserting that PPB had a policy or practice of unconstitutionally using excessive force on people who either were or were perceived to be mentally ill. The City of Portland denied, and continues to deny, that any such policy or practice existed or exists. But the 1 The City subsequently settled a civil rights action brought on behalf of Mr. Campbell’s estate, Estate of Aaron Campbell v. Ronald Frashour, et al., United States District Court (Oregon) No. 3:10-cv-01358-MO. The City also attempted, unsuccessfully, to fire the officer who shot Mr. Campbell. The City was held to have committed an unfair labor practice when it refused to implement an arbitrator’s award directing the officer’s reinstatement. Portland Police Association v. City of Portland, 275 Or. App. 700, 365 P.3d 1123 (2015). 3 Case: 16-73878, 12/09/2016, ID: 10227894, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 5 of 26 City also was and is committed to improving both the performance and the perceived legitimacy of its Police Bureau. Desiring an outcome beneficial to all, and most importantly to the community PPB serves, the City embarked on extended negotiations with DOJ to agree on improvements that the City could implement to improve the interactions between the police and people with mental illness, to enhance transparency, and to build trust and legitimacy with the community. The United States and the City of Portland reached a Settlement Agreement, after protracted negotiations, without the need for the United States to commence an action in court. The City agreed to make improvements in its police policies and practices, and to enhance public oversight, transparency and accountability for incidents involving use of force by Portland police. The quid pro quo for the City’s agreement was the agreement of the United States that the agreement would be effectuated and implemented by the parties, without the active involvement of the District Court. To that end, the parties agreed that the agreement would take the form of a Settlement Agreement, rather than a consent decree, that there would be no court-appointed monitor, and that the District Court would be involved only to the extent that either of the parties invoked the provisions of the Settlement Agreement dealing with breach (Settlement Agreement, ¶¶ 181-186). 4 Case: 16-73878, 12/09/2016, ID: 10227894, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 6 of 26 The City’s insistence that these results be achieved through a Settlement Agreement between the City and the United States, rather than by a consent decree entered by the Court, was intentional. An essential feature of the Settlement Agreement, from the City’s point of view, was that the parties themselves would be responsible for its progress and enforcement. The DOJ agreed to this structure, so long as it could file, and then conditionally dismiss, a federal court action in order to ensure that the District Court would retain jurisdiction to enforce the Agreement under the specific circumstances set forth at paragraphs 181 through 186 of the Settlement Agreement. Short of invocation of that process by DOJ, however, the Settlement Agreement never was intended to involve the active, independent participation by the Court in its monitoring or implementation. As agreed by the parties, DOJ filed the action and moved to enter the Settlement Agreement and to dismiss the case. Since the action was filed, the District Court has taken an escalating series of steps to enlarge the proceedings, to insinuate itself into and take control of the implementation of the Settlement Agreement, and, thus, fundamentally to alter the bargain struck by the parties. Before entering the Settlement Agreement, the District Court conducted a fairness hearing, allowed the Portland Police Association (the union representing the sworn, non- supervisory, officers of the Portland Police Bureau) to intervene as a party, and 5 Case: 16-73878, 12/09/2016, ID: 10227894, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 7 of 26 granted “enhanced amicus” status to the Albina Ministerial Alliance Coalition for Justice and Police Reform. Following the fairness hearing, the District Court initially proposed to stay, rather than dismiss the action, to retain jurisdiction to enforce “any provision” of the Settlement Agreement, and to require periodic evidentiary hearings to assess the City’s compliance and to address the District Court’s concerns. The United States, the City and PPA conferred and proposed an alternative Order, which would have dismissed the action, while allowing the parties access to the District Court to enforce the Settlement Agreement and the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and PPA, would have clarified the termination and enforcement provisions of the Agreements, and would have created a mechanism for the person charged with assessing compliance with the Settlement Agreement (known as the “COCL,” an acronym for Compliance Officer and Community Liaison) to have provided information to the District Court. The District Court rejected the parties’ proposed order, and entered its own Order Entering Settlement Agreement, Conditionally Dismissing Litigation, and Setting First Annual Settlement-Compliance Hearing. (ER-78). That Order was the subject of the City’s appeal in United States of America v. City of Portland, Ninth Circuit No. 14-35903. On appeal, in mediation with 6 Case: 16-73878, 12/09/2016, ID: 10227894, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 8 of 26 the assistance of Circuit Mediator Lisa Jaye and the Honorable Edward Leavy, Senior Circuit Judge, the parties negotiated an alternative Order, which provided only for annual status conferences to receive reports from the parties (including the intervenor and the “enhanced amicus”) and the COCL and the Community Oversight Advisory Board (another entity created pursuant to the Settlement Agreement).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NWLP-06-06-08.Pdf (7.901Mb)
    See Inside MEETINGMEETING NOTICESNOTICES Page 6 Volume 109 Number 11 June 6, 2008 Portland Retired Labor Press editor, columnist Gene Klare dies Gene Klare, retired editor of the Labor Press The Labor Press is a non-profit and the longest-serving columnist in the news- newspaper owned by 20 local unions and labor and Journal from publishing, but it did take a toll on their cir- paper’s 109-year history, died May 30 from councils under the Oregon Labor Press Publishing culation. It was a subject Klare re-visited often in his “Let Me complications following a mild heart attack. He Co. It was created in 1900 as the Portland Labor Say This About That” column. He even wrote a 100,000- was 81. Press, but has undergone three name changes since word manuscript about a “fictional” newspaper strike. Klare became the seventh editor of the then then — the Oregon Labor Press in 1915, the Ore- During the labor dispute, Klare helped members of the strik- Oregon Labor Press in October 1965. He suc- gon/Washington Labor Press in 1986, and the ing unions establish the Portland Reporter, a tabloid newspaper ceeded James Goodsell, who left after 14 years Northwest Labor Press in 1987. that began publishing in February 1960. It ceased operations to become director of the U.S. Department of Klare was a veteran of the bitter Oregonian on Sept. 30, 1964. Klare worked as a reporter, advertising sales Commerce’s regional office in Portland. newspaper strike, which started Nov. 10, 1959, and manager, and promotions manager.
    [Show full text]
  • STAYING the PROCEEDING Defendants
    Case 1:21-cv-00462-JPO Document 35 Filed 04/27/21 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 21 Civ. 462 (JPO) v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL STIPULATION AND CONSENT PROTECTION AGENCY, et ano., ORDER FURTHER STAYING THE PROCEEDING Defendants. WHEREAS, on or about January 19, 2021, the State of New York, State of California, State of Connecticut, State of Delaware, State of Illinois, State of Maine, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, People of the State of Michigan, State of Minnesota, State of New Jersey, State of New Mexico, State of North Carolina, State of Oregon, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Vermont, State of Washington, State of Wisconsin, King County Washington, City of Chicago, and City of New York (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a complaint in the above-captioned matter (the “Complaint”) against the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency1 (collectively, “Defendants” or “EPA”); WHEREAS, the Complaint seeks, inter alia, a declaration that the final rule entitled “Strengthening Transparency in Pivotal Science Underlying Significant Regulatory Actions and Influential Scientific Information,” 86 Fed. Reg. 469 (Jan. 6, 2021) (“Final Rule”), is in excess of 1 Administrator Michael S. Regan is automatically substituted in place of former Administrator Andrew R. Wheeler pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). Case 1:21-cv-00462-JPO Document 35 Filed 04/27/21 Page 2 of 9 EPA’s statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations; is not in accordance with law; and is arbitrary and capricious; and vacatur of the Final Rule; WHEREAS, on February 1, 2021, the United States District Court for the District of Montana ordered that the “Final Rule is hereby vacated and remanded to the Environmental Protection Agency,” Envt’l Def.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland-Tribune-030414.Pdf
    EDITION GREATER PORTLAND PortlandTribuneTUESDAY, MARCHo 4, r t l a n2014 • dPORTLANDTRIBUNE.COM • PUBLISHED TUESDAY AND THURSDAY This poll takes a deeper look at the values HOW LIBERAL we all hold DHM Research, Pamplin Media nd common ground in Oregonians’ IS PORTLAND? desire for better state By ADAM DAVIS, DHM RESEARCH TRIBUNE FILE PHOTOS: CHRISTOPHER ONSTOTT For The Tribune Members of the Occupy Portland movement took over part of downtown in mid-October 2011, with many dressed in Guy Fawkes masks from the 2005 movie “V for Vendetta.” But that does not mean Portland is at odds with the rest of the region and state on every issue. To the contrary, the poll fi nds a Beginning today, DHM Research lot of common ground among most Oregonians. For example, 94 percent of Portlanders believe taxes are necessary to pay for the common good. A joins Pamplin Media Group to share signifi cant 86 percent in the region and 85 percent in the state agree. with Portland-area residents the re- sults of the 2013 Oregon Values and Beliefs Study. In the weeks and months ahead, you will learn how Oregonians ■ This ain’t ‘Portlandia,’ but it sure feels like it, according to a feel about a variety of issues, ranging from the economy Now is the survey highlighting the Rose City’s very lefty political leanings and the environ- ment to health care moment to and support for the veryone knows Portland is more lib- disadvantaged. give voice eral than the rest of the region and Story by Jim Redden It has been the the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Clips Template
    The Oregonian Portland City Council votes to fight transparency: Editorial Agenda 2016 By The Oregonian Editorial Board January 14, 2016 The Portland City Council articulated an interesting position on transparency Wednesday: There is, in fact, no public document too old to release to the public without a fight. Thank your lucky stars that these people don't write Oregon's public records laws. Council voted 4-1 to support a resolution requested by the city attorney's office and plopped on the agenda at the eleventh hour. The single dissenter was Commissioner Steve Novick, who said, in effect, City Council might not like the transparency with which it must function, but the law's the law. The Council's transparency crisis began with a September 2015 request for three legal opinions and a memorandum written by the city attorney to Portland's mayor and colleagues. The three opinions were penned in the 1980s, and the memorandum was written in 1990. In other words, a looooong time ago. Mark Bartlett, who requested the legal advice and the memo, read about the documents in a 2002 email in which a city Water Bureau employee discussed mixed public ownership on Mt. Tabor. Both the Water Bureau, supported by ratepayer funds, and the Parks Bureau, supported by property tax revenue, own property there, Brad Schmidt of The Oregonian/OregonLive reported. The 2002 email, citing the legal advice Bartlett has requested, cautioned that "Parks cannot use a Water Fund property for any purpose, and neither can Water Funds be used in support of a Park purpose, without 'market value' compensation to the Water Fund in some form." The use – and potential misuse - of utility funds is a sore spot for city leaders, who surely don't relish the prospect of being poked there yet again.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Membershipmatters
    December 2012 MEMBERSHIPmatters 2013 ODA Board of Trustees MEMBERSHIP TABLE OF CNONTE TS matters Volume 18, number 7 Official publication of the Oregon Dental December 2012 Association in support of its core purpose to advance the dental profession and promote the highest standard of oral health and oral health care. ON THE COVER OREGON DENTAL ASSOCIATION PO Box 3710, Wilsonville OR 97070 503.218.2010 • www.oregondental.org PUBLICATIONS AdVISORY COMMITTEE Editor Barry J. Taylor, DMD, CDE, [email protected] Steve Gold, DDS Mehdi Salari, DMD Kurt L. Ferré, DDS Steven E. Timm, DMD Thomas J. Hilton, DMD, MS ODA LEADERSHIP President Secretary-Treasurer Jill M. Price, DMD Sean A. Benson, DDS [email protected] [email protected] President-Elect Speaker of the House Judd R. Larson, DDS Jeffery C. B. Stewart, DDS, MS [email protected] [email protected] 2013 ODA Board of Trustees Vice President Executive Director BACK ROW: Dr. Kae Cheng, Dr. Tyler Bryan, Dr. Joni Young, Dr. Mark Stapleton, Steven E. Timm, DMD William E. Zepp, CAE [email protected] [email protected] Dr. Dave Carneiro, Dr. Rogers Sims, Dr. Fred Bremner, Dr. Tom Pollard, Dr. Richard Garfinkle, Dr. Mark Mutschler, Dr. Tom Tucker, Dr. Athena Bettger, ODO A B ARD OF TRUSTEES Dr. Tim Richardson, Karley Bedford, Dr. Gary Boehne, Margie Campbell, ADA Delegate at Large Multnomah Rickland G. Asai, DMD Athena M. Bettger, DMD Dr. Jim McMahan David J. Dowsett, DMD Richard L. Garfinkle, DDS FNRO T ROW: Dr. Barry Taylor, Dr. Sean Benson, Dr. Steve Timm, Dr. Jill Price, Central Oregon Mark D.
    [Show full text]
  • USCA Case #20-1167 Document #1844657 Filed: 05/27/2020 Page 1 of 18
    USCA Case #20-1167 Document #1844657 Filed: 05/27/2020 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM, ATTORNEY GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA, and the CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF HAWAII, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF MAINE, STATE OF MARYLAND, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF OREGON, COMMONWEALTH OF No. _____________20-1167 PENNSYLVANIA, STATE OF RHODE ISLAND, STATE OF VERMONT, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF WISCONSIN, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF NEW YORK, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, and CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, Petitioners, v. ANDREW R. WHEELER, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; ELAINE L. CHAO, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department 1 USCA Case #20-1167 Document #1844657 Filed: 05/27/2020 Page 2 of 18 of Transportation; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; JAMES C. OWENS, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, Respondents. PETITION FOR REVIEW Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1) (Clean Air Act § 307(b)(1)), 49 U.S.C. § 32909(a)(1),
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 – 2017
    Annual Report 2016 – 2017 City Club Mission: To inform its members and the community in public matters and to arouse in them a realization of the obligations of citizenship. 2016–2017 BOARD OF GOVERNORS Kourtney Nelson, President Sel Nutor, President-Elect David Thompson, Treasurer Felisa Hagins, Secretary Greg Macpherson, Immediate Past President Karol Collymore, Governor to 2017 Leslie Johnson, Governor to 2018 Colin Jones, Governor to 2019 Antonio Lara, Governor to 2018 Mary Macpherson, Governor to 2019 Nichole Maher, Governor to 2019 Juan Martinez, Governor to 2018 Elana Pirtle-Guiney, Governor to 2017 Allison Tivnon, Governor to 2018 Sharon VanSickle Robbins, Governor to 2017 Eli Wall, Governor to 2017 Lisa Watson, Governor to 2019 901 SW Washington St. Portland OR 97205 503-228-7231 [email protected] www.pdxcityclub.org https://www.facebook.com/pdxcityclub https://twitter.com/pdxcityclub Tax ID # 93-0140220 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. From the President and the Executive Director 2. Purpose, Principles, & Objectives 3. Key Numbers 4. Research 5. Advocacy & Awareness 6. Programs a. Friday Forums b. Issue Forums c. New Leaders Collective d. Civic Drinks e. Civic Scholars 7. Membership 8. Member Recognition 9. Donor Recognition a. Endowments b. Legacy Society c. 2016–2017 Leadership Circle d. 2016–2017 Annual Fund Donors 10. Corporate & Foundation Sponsors 11. Financial Reports 12. Staff, Interns, and Volunteers 13. Members 3 1. FROM THE PRESIDENT Dear Fellow Club Members, What a year! I knew that my year serving as your president would be eventful, but I couldn’t have guessed we’d have so much excitement—from Ballotpalooza to unexpected local and national election results to our new executive director.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Clips Template
    The Oregonian Portland street fee: Mayor Charlie Hales says city must get public to 'grudging acceptance' of street fee By Andrew Theen UPDATED: This story was updated with reaction from Commissioner Amanda Fritz and more coverage from Tuesday's press conference Portland Mayor Charlie Hales said despite Tuesday's announcement that the City Council was delaying until November its vote on a controversial street fee proposal, he and Commissioner Steve Novick still believe the city needs to move forward with the "imperfect but doable option." Hales said he sees three options facing the City Council as it waits to take up the street fee on businesses and residential property owners on Nov. 12: "Do this, do nothing, or do something else that produces enough revenue." "I'm in favor of doing this," Hales said of the street fee. On Tuesday morning, Hales and Novick decided to shelve an up-or-down vote on the street fee scheduled for Wednesday morning. Novick said the delay amounts to "hitting the pause button" and will allow the duo to home in on tough issues like how to ensure low-income families in apartment complexes actually received discounts. The delay is the latest fundamental shift in what's been a rapidly evolving plan characterized by missteps in recent weeks. During that time, backers decided to split the residential and business portions of the monthly fee and the projected monthly cost for residents changed twice before the council held a contentious public hearing last Thursday. The latest about-face followed a 5 1/2 hour public hearing last week where Hales and Novick reiterated their determination to proceed with a City Council vote Wednesday.
    [Show full text]
  • PORTLAND, OREGON Portland, Oregon 97204 Phone: 503-823-4682 Fax: (503)-823-4019 OFFICE of PUBLIC SAFETY [email protected]
    OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER STEVE NOVICK CITY OF 1221 SW 4th Ave. Suite 210 PORTLAND, OREGON Portland, Oregon 97204 Phone: 503-823-4682 Fax: (503)-823-4019 OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY [email protected] FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Chris Warner, Chief of Staff Office of Commissioner Steve Novick [email protected] Office: 503-823-4682 NEWS RELEASE: Momentum builds for Portland gas tax to fund street repair and traffic safety October 5, 2015— For almost thirty years, Portland's streets have been deteriorating due to inadequate transportation funding. Every year, the problem gets worse because the longer you wait to repair a street, the more expensive it is to fix. Meanwhile, there are parts of the city where, because of dangerous intersections or gaps in sidewalks along busy streets, it is unsafe for children to walk to school and for seniors to walk to bus stops. Over the past month, however, momentum has been building for a new funding source for street repair and traffic safety: A local gas tax. The City Club of Portland, in its recently released report, Portland’s Streets: Ending the funding gridlock, endorsed a local gas tax as a much needed, new funding source dedicated to transportation investments. The Portland Business Alliance indicated support for a local gas tax in a September 8, 2015 letter to Commissioner Novick. Mayor Hales has also stated support for a gas tax, as has his primary opponent, Treasurer Wheeler. The Portland Tribune and Oregonian editorial boards have both expressed support for a gas tax. Additionally, the Northeast Coalition of Neighborhoods recently surveyed its members and found that a gas tax was the most popular way to fund transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Pamphlet
    Elections Division Washington 3700 SW Murray Blvd. Beaverton, OR 97005-2365 County www.co.washington.or.us voters’ pamphlet VOTE-BY-MAIL PRIMARY ELECTION May 18, 2010 To be counted, voted ballots must be in our office by 8:00 pm on May 18, 2010 ATTENTION This is the beginning of your county voters’ pamphlet. The Washington County county portion of this joint voters’ pamphlet is inserted in Board of County the center of the state portion. Each page of the county voters’ pamphlet is clearly marked with a color bar on the Commissioners outside edge. All information contained in the county por- tion of this pamphlet has been assembled and printed Tom Brian, Chair by Rich Hobernicht, County Clerk-Ex Officio, Director Dick Schouten, District 1 Washington County Assessment & Taxation. Desari Strader, District 2 Roy Rogers, District 3 Dear Voter: Andy Duyck, District 4 This pamphlet contains information for several districts and there may be candidates/measures included that are not on your ballot. If you have any questions, call 503-846-5800. WC-2 WC-3 WASHINGTON COUNTY Commissioner at Large Commissioner at Large Andy Dick Duyck Schouten OCCUPATION: Owner, Duyck OCCUPATION: Washington County Machine; Farmer; County Commissioner Commissioner OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND: Attorney Same as occupation EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: UCLA Law School, JD; Santa Clara Portland Community College; University, BS Political Science Machine Technology; Hilhi PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL EXPERIENCE: Washington County PRIOR GOVERNMENTAL
    [Show full text]
  • Media Clips Template
    The Oregonian The education of Steve Novick: Rookie Portland commissioner struggles to turn smarts into successes By Andrew Theen May 16, 2015 A year ago this week, Portland Commissioner Steve Novick stood on a grassy hillside in Southeast Portland's Kenilworth Park to pitch a plan to fix the city's crumbling streets. Portlanders, he and Mayor Charlie Hales announced, would pay new fees totaling about $40 million a year for streets and safety projects. "If the voters are really mad at us," Novick added, "we're both up for re-election in 2016. They can throw us out." The moment – and the rancorous debate in the months that followed – illustrate the best and worst of Novick, a rookie city commissioner in his first elective office: He's not afraid to take a stand or to fight for what he believes in, even at the cost of his own popularity. But he's still learning how to turn big ideas into action in Portland's unique commission form of government. And he often lets his quick wit – or sharp tongue, depending on your perspective -- get the best of him. After more than two years in office, Novick has a thin list of accomplishments. He and Hales spent 2014 trying to pass a street fee or tax only to come up empty-handed as voters, business owners and ultimately their three City Council colleagues shot down plan after plan. At one point, a frustrated Novick said the Portland Business Alliance would rather "burn the city to the ground" than pass a progressive income tax for transportation projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidates for Governor Respond to OWLS Questionnaire
    Published Quarterly by Oregon Women Lawyers Volume 21, No. 4 Fall 2010 Candidates for Governor Respond to OWLS Quest ionnaire By Heather L. Weigler fter the May 2010 primary, OWLS’ Judicial working with foundations that provide educa- President Work Group sent a questionnaire to the tional opportunities for students. He noted that Concetta Schwesinger major-party candidates for governor, social pressures and artificial barriers are present Vice President, A Democrat John Kitzhaber and Republican Chris in society and expressed a commitment to work President-Elect Heather L. Weigler Dudley. The candidates were asked questions together to overcome those barriers, including by making his administration and appointments Secretary regarding diversity and judicial appointments, Cashauna Hill and they were told that their answers would be representative of Oregonians and reflect the Treasurer published in the Fall issue of the AdvanceSheet. issues Oregonians face. To read the letter in its Megan Livermore Minor-party candidates were sent the same entirety, visit www.oregonwomenlawyers.org. Historian questionnaire after the filing deadline. Their Dr. Kitzhaber’s answers are reprinted here in Kathleen J. Hansa Rastetter responses will be made available on the OWLS their entirety. Board Members website. What experiences have you had with Oregon’s Sally Anderson-Hansell Mr. Dudley did not submit answers to the ques- Hon. Frances Burge minority communities that will allow you to Megan Burgess tions posed by OWLS. He did send a letter sum- represent their interests as governor? Bonnie Cafferky Carter marizing his life experiences that have provided Throughout my years in the legislature and as Dana Forman him the opportunities to work with people from Gina Hagedorn governor, I have maintained a good relationship Heather Hepburn different backgrounds and who hold a variety of with minority communities in Oregon, signing Kendra Matthews perspectives, including playing in the NBA and Continued on page 4 Linda Meng Elizabeth Tedesco Milesnick Hon.
    [Show full text]