DOCSLIB.ORG

Discovering Ancient

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Discovering Ancient Ancient China The Bantu Expansion (ca. 2,000 BCE-1,000 CE) • Modern mtDNA and Y chromosome studies show that the Bantu Expansion was a migration of people, not just a diffusion of culture and language. • Ancient DNA perspectives: – Prior to the arrival of agriculture, hunter- gatherers related to the modern San lived across southern and eastern Africa. – Farmers initially replaced these hunter- gatherers without admixing. After a few thousand years, they began to admix. • Interactions between Bantu farmers and Khoisan hunter-gatherers were sex-biased: – Bantu language speakers have comparatively low Y-chromosome diversity and high mtDNA diversity. – Reflects a patrilocal marriage system in Pakendorf, B. et al. (2011). Molecular perspectives on the Bantu expansion: a synthesis which male farmers married female hunter- Lang. Dynames Change, 1, pp. 50-88 Skoglund, P. et al. (2017). Reconstructing Prehistoric African Population Structure. Cell gatherers. 171 (1): 59-71. Crowther et al. (2017). Subsistence mosaics, forager-farmer interactions, and the transition to food production in eastern Africa. Quaternary International. The Deep History of Social Divisions in South Asia • Modern nuclear DNA studies show that significant founder effects have taken place within Indian castes. • Increased risk to recessive genetic diseases when marrying within castes. • Ancient North Indian ancestry is more common in upper castes and Indo-European language speakers. Ancient South Indian ancestry is more common in lower castes and Dravidian language speakers. • Divisions between castes became established starting between 4,000-2,000 years ago (after the Indus collapse). High caste men more often marry low caste women. • Genetics can reveal intersections between social and gender- based inequalities. Moorjani, P. et al. (2013). Genetic Evidence for Recent Population Mixture in India. Am J Hum Genet 93 (3): 422-438. Nakatsuka, N. et al. (2017). The promise of discovering population-specific disease-associated genes in South Asia. Nature Genetics 49: 1403-1407. Reich, D. et al. (2009). Reconstructing Indian population history. Nature 461: 489-494. Outline of Today’s Class: Ancient China 1) Overview of Chinese archaeology in the Yellow River Valley Region a. How could we study the spread of farming associated with the Neolithic Yangshao culture using aDNA? b. How could we study site-specific questions about the Shang Dynasty capital at Anyang using aDNA? c. How could we study Han imperial expansion and early Silk Road trade routes using aDNA? 2) The current state of aDNA research in China East Asian Geography Two Main Rivers in China Yellow River (huanghe 黄河) Yangzi River (changjiang 长江) Farming populations associated with the Yangshao culture expanded across the central and upper Yellow River valley region ca. 5,000 BCE- 3,000 BCE. Liu, L., & Chen, X. (2012). The Archaeology of China: From the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age. Cambridge University Press. Early Yangshao (ca. 5,000-4,000 BCE, Banpo Phase) • Site layout and burials indicate that Early Yangshao societies at sites such as Banpo, were egalitarian. Liu, L., & Chen, X. (2012). The Archaeology of China: From the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age. Cambridge University Press. Middle to Late Yangshao (ca. 4,000-3,000 BCE) – Large houses for public rituals. – Burials of different sizes and numbers of grave goods. – Development of social hierarchies. Large house at Xipo Burial at Xipo Xishuipo burial of a high status man. Chieftain? Ritual specialist? Yangshao Painted Pottery Yangshao Beer! Residue analysis reveals that beer made from millet, barley, job’s tears, and tubers was fermented in stored in jiandiping 尖底瓶 amphorae-shaped vessels. Competitive feasting involving fermented beverages was associated with the emergence of social complexity in China. The Shang Dynasty (1600-1046 BCE) Shang Dynasty capital at Anyang (ca. 1250-1046 BCE) • City layout reflects “clan” lineages. Lineages were the basis of social, economic, and political organization. • Each lineage lived in a neighborhood with its own houses, cemeteries, and massive craft workshops (for bronze, jade, bone, etc.). Campbell, R.(2014). Archaeology of the Chinese Bronze Age: From Erlitou to Anyang. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press. Analyzing bone workshop debris at Anyang. Anyang Royal Cemetery • Royal tombs are cross-shaped tombs with ramps. Almost all tombs were looted in antiquity. • Sacrifices in pits surrounding these tombs include hundreds of animals and war captives/slaves. Sacrifices were a central part of the construction of royal power. Campbell, R.(2014). Archaeology of the Chinese Bronze Age: From Erlitou to Anyang. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press. The First Horses and Chariots in China are Found at Anyang Oracle Bone Inscriptions at Anyang • Earliest written inscriptions in East Asia. • Topics: Offerings to be made to ancestors, weather, harvests, eclipses, dreams, childbirth, military campaigns, and royal hunts. Oracle bone pit. Fu Hao’s Tomb • Unlooted tomb found in the Palace- Temple area of Anyang. • Fu Hao’s name appears in oracle bone inscriptions about 200 times. According to these oracle bone inscriptions, she was the consort of King Wu Ding, mother of another King (possibly Zu Geng or Zu Jia), and a successful military leader. • Her tomb also contains many weapons, showing her military prowess. Reconstruction of the Fu Hao ancestral shrine in the • An ancestral shrine was built on top Anyang archaeological site park. of her tomb. Fu Hao’s Tomb Sixteen human sacrificial victims, six dog sacrifices, 468 bronzes, 755 jades, 110 stone objects, 564 bone objects, 3 ivory objects, 11 ceramic vessels, and thousands of cowrie shells. Reconstruction showing the arrangement of artifacts in Fu Hao’s Tomb Fu Hao’s Tomb Fu Hao’s Tomb Qin Dynasty (221-210 BCE) • Emperor Qinshi Huangdi’s military campaigns unified rival warring states. • The dynasty established standardized systems of measurement, currency, and writing that were shared across the entire Qin territory. • Walls from previous states linked together to form the earliest version of China’s “Great Wall.” Section of the great wall Terracotta warriors Modern depiction of the Qin Emperor Han Dynasty (206 BCE – 220 CE) • Imperial expansion (including migration) into the far northeast, northwest, and southwest. • Development of Silk Road trade routes that were used throughout Chinese history. Ancient DNA Research in China • Three new ancient DNA laboratories. Materials cannot be exported from China. • Applications for the Paleolithic: – Identify fossil hominins in East Asia. – Clarify the genetic relationships between modern humans and other ancestral hominins. – Document the ancient distributions of hunter-gatherer populations. • Neolithic and Post-Neolithic: – Clarify the nature of the Neolithic transition (e.g., the spread of Yangshao farmers and their relationships with hunter-gatherers). – Answer site-specific questions (e.g., kin relationships, origins of sacrificial victims at Anyang, origins of domestic horses, etc.). – Understand other population migration and turnover events (e.g., Han Dynasty imperial expansion). – Reveal aspects of long-distance trade, exchange, and interaction (e.g., Silk Road trade routes). • Other applications: Animal and plant domestication, environmental reconstruction, paleodiet, paleodisease, and more. Next time…migrations into the Americas!.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Science Journals — AAAS
    RESEARCH ◥ the lake level could not exceed 1975 m asl (25 to TECHNICAL RESPONSE 50 m lower than we reconstruct) due to a low divide upstream of the dam (3); however, Han’s datum is obtained from Google Earth, whereas ARCHAEOLOGY a more accurate 1:50,000 topographic map shows that it is ~2010 m asl, within our range. More- over, the sharp crest at this site suggests that it Response to Comments on “Outburst mayhavebeenloweredbymasswastingoverthe past 4000 years. flood at 1920 BCE supports Huang et al.(4) argue that there is no sedi- mentary evidence to support the maximum level historicity of China’s Great Flood of the dammed lake. This is true because the lake with level above 1890 m asl only existed for a few months, and at its peak (~2000 to 2025 m and the Xia dynasty” asl), only for a few days, too short to leave behind sediments that would have survived subsequent Qinglong Wu,1,2* Zhijun Zhao,1,2 Li Liu,3† Darryl E. Granger,4 Hui Wang,5 subaerial exposure. The lacustrine (not fluvial) sediments in Jishi Gorge represent the remnant David J. Cohen,6† Xiaohong Wu,7 Maolin Ye,5 Ofer Bar-Yosef,8 Bin Lu,9 Jin Zhang,10 lake, which persisted long after the breach and Peizhen Zhang,11 Daoyang Yuan,12 Wuyun Qi,5 Linhai Cai,13 Shibiao Bai1,2 was gradually filled in (1). Lacustrine sediment in Jishi Gorge was previ- Downloaded from Wu et al., Han, and Huang et al. question our reconstruction of a large outburst flood ously dated to ~8000 to 5500 years before the and its possible relationship to China’s Great Flood and the Xia dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocene Environmental Archaeology of the Yangtze River Valley in China: a Review
    land Review Holocene Environmental Archaeology of the Yangtze River Valley in China: A Review Li Wu 1,2,*, Shuguang Lu 1, Cheng Zhu 3, Chunmei Ma 3, Xiaoling Sun 1, Xiaoxue Li 1, Chenchen Li 1 and Qingchun Guo 4 1 Provincial Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Regional Response in the Yangtze-Huaihe River Basin, School of Geography and Tourism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241002, China; [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (X.S.); [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (C.L.) 2 State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China 3 School of Geograpy and Ocean Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China; [email protected] (C.Z.); [email protected] (C.M.) 4 School of Environment and Planning, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng 252000, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The Yangtze River Valley is an important economic region and one of the cradles of human civilization. It is also the site of frequent floods, droughts, and other natural disasters. Conducting Holocene environmental archaeology research in this region is of great importance when studying the evolution of the relationship between humans and the environment and the interactive effects humans had on the environment from 10.0 to 3.0 ka BP, for which no written records exist. This Citation: Wu, L.; Lu, S.; Zhu, C.; review provides a comprehensive summary of materials that have been published over the past Ma, C.; Sun, X.; Li, X.; Li, C.; Guo, Q.
    [Show full text]
  • Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications
    Boise State University ScholarWorks Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Anthropology Summer 2017 Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications Shengqian Chen Renmin University of China Pei-Lin Yu Boise State University This document was originally published by University of Chicago Press in Journal of Anthropological Research. Copyright restrictions may apply. doi: 10.1086/692104 Early “Neolithics” of China: Variation and Evolutionary Implications SHENGQIAN CHEN, School of History, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872 PEI-LIN YU, Department of Anthropology, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA. Email: [email protected] The growth and significance of scientific research into the origins of agriculture in China calls for fresh examination at scales large enough to facilitate explanation of cultural evolutionary processes. The Paleolithic to Neolithic transition (PNT) is not yet well-understood because most archaeo- logical research on early agriculture cites data from the more conspicuous and common early Neo- lithic sites. In this, the first of two papers, we synthesize a broad range of early Neolithic archae- ological data, including diagnostic artifacts, settlement patterns, site structure, and biological remains, to consider agriculture as a system-level adaptive phenomenon. Although farming by this period was already well-established in much of North China and the middle Yangtze River basin, echoes of the foraging past can be found in the persistence of hunting-related artifacts in North China’s Loess Plateau and aquatic-based intensification and vegeculture in South China. Our analysis of the growing body of Chinese data and projections using Binford’s hunting and gathering database indicate that agriculture was differentially developed, adopted, or resisted by foragers according to measurable, predictable initial conditions of habitat that influenced diet breadth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yangguanzhai Neolithic Archaeological Project
    THE YANGGUANZHAI NEOLITHIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL PROJECT, CHINA Course ID: ARCH 380A June 14 -July 18, 2020 Academic Credits: 8 Semester Credit Units (Equivalent to 12 Quarter Units) School of Record: Connecticut College PROJECT DIRECTORS: Dr. Richard Ehrich, Northwest University (China) and UCLA ([email protected]) Dr. Zhouyong Sun, Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology, China ([email protected]) Mr. Yang Liping, Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology, China ([email protected]) INTRODUCTION The prehistoric village of Yangguanzhai (YGZ) dates to the Middle to Late Yangshao period (c. 3,500 - 3,000 BCE). It is one of the largest settlements of its kind. The site is located in the Jing River Valley, approximately 25 kilometers north of the ancient city of Xi’an in northwest China. Since 2004, in preparation for a major construction project, the Shaanxi Provincial Institute of Archaeology began to conduct large-scale excavations and exploratory surveys – by means of test trenches and coring with the Luoyang spade – in various parts of the site. More than 18,000 square meters have been excavated to date. These activities revealed a moat, a row of cave dwellings, subterranean houses, child urn burials in the residential areas, and numerous pottery kilns. The quantity and quality of finds were impressive enough for the Chinese authorities to halt commercial development and declare the area a protected archaeological site. In 2010, as part of the ongoing excavation, a joint UCLA/Shaanxi Province Archaeological Academy/Xibei University project began to operate at the site. This project is shifting the focus from the large-scale exposure of architecture to a more careful and systematic analysis of local stratigraphy and a stronger 1 | P a g e emphasis on anthropological interpretations.
    [Show full text]
  • Emperor Yu's Flood
    INSIGHTS on September 6, 2016 http://science.sciencemag.org/ PERSPECTIVES Downloaded from ANTHROPOLOGY Emperor Yu’s Great Flood Geological data provide support for a legendary flood in China ~4000 years ago By David R. Montgomery with the major cultural transition from the older myth or propaganda to justify the Late Neolithic to the Early Bronze Age in centralized power of imperial rule (1, 3). e know of the legendary Emperor China and that also helps explain curious In contrast to the hero of another well- Yu through the story of China’s details of Yu’s story. known flood story, Yu is not heralded for Great Flood, a tale already an- According to folk tradition, the story of surviving a great deluge sent by an angry cient when first recorded around Yu’s Great Flood is an oral history of real god. Rather, the story tells of how he di- 1000 BCE (1). On page 579 of this disaster, handed down for a millennium be- rected efforts to dredge and channel rivers issue, Wu et al. offer a provocative fore entering written records. However, in to drain the floodwaters (3). It casts this Wnew explanation for this story. They pre- the absence of geological evidence for such sent evidence for an enormous landslide a flood, some scholars have argued that the Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, dam break 1922 ± 28 BCE (2) that coincided story is either a historicized version of an WA 98195, USA. Email: [email protected] COLLECTION BIGELOW WILLIAM STURGIS IMAGE: 538 5 AUGUST 2016 • VOL 353 ISSUE 6299 sciencemag.org SCIENCE Published by AAAS Battling the Great Flood.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatiotemporal Distribution Patterns of Archaeological Sites In
    HOL0010.1177/0959683616641743The HoloceneHosner et al. 641743research-article2016 Research paper The Holocene 2016, Vol. 26(10) 1576 –1593 Spatiotemporal distribution patterns of © The Author(s) 2016 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav archaeological sites in China during the DOI: 10.1177/0959683616641743 Neolithic and Bronze Age: An overview hol.sagepub.com Dominic Hosner,1 Mayke Wagner,1 Pavel E Tarasov,2 Xiaocheng Chen1 and Christian Leipe1,2 Abstract A total of 51,074 archaeological sites from the early Neolithic to the early Iron Age (c. 8000–500 BC), with a spatial extent covering most regions of China (c. 73–131°E and c. 20–53°N), were analysed over space and time in this study. Site maps of 25 Chinese provinces, autonomous regions and municipalities, published in the series ‘Atlas of Chinese Cultural Relics’, were used to extract, digitalise and correlate its archaeological data. The data were, in turn, entered into a database using a self-developed mapping software that makes the data, in a dynamic way, analysable as a contribution to various scientific questions, such as population growth and migrations, spread of agriculture and changes in subsistence strategies. The results clearly show asynchronous patterns of changes between the northern and southern parts of China (i.e. north and south of the Yangtze River, respectively) but also within these macro-regions. In the northern part of China (i.e. along the Yellow River and its tributaries and in the Xiliao River basin), the first noticeable increase in the concentration of Neolithic sites occurred between c. 5000 and 4000 BC; however, highest site concentrations were reached between c.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 Chinese Archaeology: Past, Present
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-64310-8 - Cambridge World Archaeology: The Archaeology of China: From the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age Li Liu and Xingcan Chen Excerpt More information CHAPTER 1 CHINESE ARCHAEOLOGY: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE The archaeological materials recovered from the Anyang excavations . in the period between 1928 and 1937 ...havelaidanewfoundation for the study of ancient China. (Li, C. 1977:ix) When inscribed oracle bones and enormous material remains were found through scientific excavation in Anyang in 1928, the historicity of the Shang dynasty was confirmed beyond dispute for the first time (Li, C. 1977: ix–xi). This excavation thus marked the beginning of a modern Chinese archaeology endowed with great potential to reveal much of China’s ancient history. Half a century later, Chinese archaeology had made many unprecedented discoveries that surprised the world, leading Glyn Daniel to believe that “a new awareness of the importance of China will be a key development in archaeology in the decades ahead” (Daniel 1981: 211). This enthusiasm was soon shared by the Chinese archaeologists when Su Bingqi announced that “the Golden Age of Chinese archaeology is arriving” (Su, B. 1994: 139–40). In recent decades, archaeology has continuously prospered, becoming one of the most rapidly developing fields of social science in China. As suggested by Bruce Trigger (Trigger 1984), three basic types of archae- ology are practiced worldwide: nationalist, colonialist, and imperialist. China’s archaeology clearly falls into the first category. Archaeology in China is defined as a discipline within the study of history that deals with material remains of the past and aims to reveal the laws of historical evolution, based on histor- ical materialism (Xia and Wang 1986: 1–3).
    [Show full text]
  • Bioarcheology of China
    Chapter 3 Bioarchaeology of China: Bridging Biological and Archaeological Inquiries Elizabeth Berger and Kate Pechenkina In China, anthropology (人类学 renleixue, literally “study of humanity”) is primar- ily used to refer to physical anthropology. Biological or physical anthropology is firmly situated within the biological disciplines, whereas archaeology is tradition- ally hosted by history departments. Consequent differences in research interests and approaches between archaeologists and biological anthropologists have influenced the development of the field. Research on archaeological human skeletons, and anthropology as a whole, in China can be divided into three historical phases: (1) the late 1800s to 1949, the formative period, when anthropology in China was practiced as a holistic discipline and biological anthropology research was dominated by comparative morphomet- rics, population history, and paleoanthropology; (2) 1949 to the early 1980s, when “anthropology” referred almost exclusively to physical anthropology, and morpho- metrics and paleoanthropology were independent of archaeology; and (3) the 1980s until today, when cultural anthropology has experienced a renewal and bioarchaeol- ogy has come to integrate the skeletal and archaeological records (Zhang 2012; Zhu 2004; Hu 2006; Guldin 1994). In its early years (before 1949), Chinese anthropology was in close communica- tion with American, British, and European scholarship. However, it also draws from a long tradition of Chinese historiography, antiquarianism, and medical stud- ies and has undergone more than 100 years of development within China to become a discipline with its own research foci and disciplinary boundaries (Guldin 1994; Hu 2006). E. Berger Lieberthal-Rogel Center for Chinese Studies, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA e-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-64310-8 - Cambridge World Archaeology: The Archaeology of China: From the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age Li Liu and Xingcan Chen Frontmatter More information THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF CHINA This book explores the roles of agricultural development and advanc- ing social complexity in the processes of state formation in China. Over a period of about 10,000 years, it follows evolutionary trajectories of society from the last Paleolithic hunting-gathering groups, through Neolithic farming villages, and on to the Bronze Age Shang dynasty in the latter half of the second millennium BC. Li Liu and Xingcan Chen demonstrate that sociopolitical evolution was multicentric and shaped by interpolity factionalism and competition, as well as by the many material technologies introduced from other parts of the world. The book illustrates how ancient Chinese societies were transformed during this period from simple to complex, tribal to urban, and preliterate to literate. Li Liu is Sir Robert Ho Tung Professor in Chinese Archaeology in the Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures at Stanford University. She is the author of two books, The Chinese Neolithic: Trajectories to Early States and (with Xingcan Chen) State Formation in Early China,aswell as more than seventy journal articles in both English and Chinese. Xingcan Chen is Senior Fellow and Deputy Director of the Institute of Archaeology at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences as well as Professor in the Department of Archaeology, Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. He is the author of numerous articles and books, including The History of Chinese Prehistoric Archaeology (1895– 1949), Essays on Archaeology, and (with Li Liu) State Formation in Early China.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology of Asia
    BLACKWELL STUDIES IN GLOBAL ARCHAEOLOGY archaeology of asia Edited by Miriam T. Stark Archaeology of Asia BLACKWELL STUDIES IN GLOBAL ARCHAEOLOGY Series Editors: Lynn Meskell and Rosemary A. Joyce Blackwell Studies in Global Archaeology is a series of contemporary texts, each care- fully designed to meet the needs of archaeology instructors and students seeking volumes that treat key regional and thematic areas of archaeological study. Each volume in the series, compiled by its own editor, includes 12–15 newly commis- sioned articles by top scholars within the volume’s thematic, regional, or temporal area of focus. What sets the Blackwell Studies in Global Archaeology apart from other available texts is that their approach is accessible, yet does not sacrifice theoretical sophistication. The series editors are committed to the idea that usable teaching texts need not lack ambition. To the contrary, the Blackwell Studies in Global Archaeology aim to immerse readers in fundamental archaeological ideas and concepts, but also to illu- minate more advanced concepts, thereby exposing readers to some of the most exciting contemporary developments in the field. Inasmuch, these volumes are designed not only as classic texts, but as guides to the vital and exciting nature of archaeology as a discipline. 1. Mesoamerican Archaeology: Theory and Practice Edited by Julia A. Hendon and Rosemary A. Joyce 2. Andean Archaeology Edited by Helaine Silverman 3. African Archaeology: A Critical Introduction Edited by Ann Brower Stahl 4. Archaeologies of the Middle East: Critical Perspectives Edited by Susan Pollock and Reinhard Bernbeck 5. North American Archaeology Edited by Timothy R. Pauketat and Diana DiPaolo Loren 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition from Foraging to Farming in Northeast China
    TRANSITION FROM FORAGING TO FARMING IN NORTHEAST CHINA VOLUME TWO (FIGURES, TABLES, BIBLIOGRAPHY AND APPENDIXES) A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMISSION TO THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By (Peter) Wei Ming JIA Department of Archaeology The University of Sydney April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................................................I-VI Figures and Tables...................................................................................... i BIBLIOGRAPHY.....................................................................................125 APPENDIX 1 THE COLLECTION OF TOOLS .......................................154 APPENDIX 2 POLLEN DATA.................................................................158 APPENDIX 3 MAMMONTH AND C14DATES........................................161 APPENDIX 4 C14DATES IN NORTHEAST CHINA ...............................165 APPENDIX 5 C14DATES OF DOMESTIC SEEDS ................................171 APPENDIX 6 FIELDWORK REPORT ....................................................172 TABLE 1-1 LOCATION OF NORTHEAST CHINA..............................................................................................................1 FIGURE 1-1 UPPER PALAEOLITHIC SITES IN NORTHEAST ASIA ....................................................................................1 FIGURE 1-2 PALAEOLITHIC SITES WITH LGM VEGETATION..........................................................................................2 FIGURE 1-3 STONE ARTEFACTS.................................................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • 891 Major Patterns in the Neolithic Chronology Of
    Major Patterns in the Neolithic Chronology of East Asia: Issues of the Origin of Pottery, Agriculture, and Civilization Item Type Article; text Authors Kuzmin, Yaroslav V.; Jull, A. J. Timothy; Burr, G. S. Citation Kuzmin, Y. V., Jull, A. J. T., & Burr, G. S. (2009). Major patterns in the Neolithic chronology of East Asia: Issues of the origin of pottery, agriculture, and civilization. Radiocarbon, 51(3), 891-903. DOI 10.1017/S0033822200033968 Publisher Department of Geosciences, The University of Arizona Journal Radiocarbon Rights Copyright © by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona. All rights reserved. Download date 25/09/2021 10:22:37 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/654257 RADIOCARBON, Vol 51, Nr 3, 2009, p 891–903 © 2009 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona MAJOR PATTERNS IN THE NEOLITHIC CHRONOLOGY OF EAST ASIA: ISSUES OF THE ORIGIN OF POTTERY, AGRICULTURE, AND CIVILIZATION1 Yaroslav V Kuzmin2 • A J Timothy Jull3 • G S Burr2 ABSTRACT. General chronological frameworks created recently for the Neolithic complexes of China, Japan, Korea, and far eastern Russia allow us to reveal temporal patterns of Neolithization, origin of food production, and the emergence of civ- ilizations. Pottery originated in East Asia, most probably independently in different parts of it, in the terminal Pleistocene, about 14,800−13,300 BP (uncalibrated), and this marks the beginning of the Neolithic. Agriculture in the eastern part of Asia emerged only in the Holocene.
    [Show full text]