DOCSLIB.ORG

Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 96 As at 23:59 Hours, 6 to 12 October 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 96 As at 23:59 Hours, 6 to 12 October 2014 Republic of South Sudan Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 96 as at 23:59 Hours, 6 to 12 October 2014 Situation Update As of 12 October 2014, a total of 6,141 cholera cases including 139 deaths (CFR 2.26%) had beenTable reported1. Summary in of South cholera Sudan cases asreported summarized in Juba in County Tables, 23 1 April and –2.12 October 2014 New New New deaths Total cases Total Total admisions discharges Total Total cases Reporting Sites 6 to 12 Oct currently facility community Total cases 6 to 12 Oct 6 to 12 Oct deaths discharged 2014 admitted deaths deaths 2014 2014 JTH CTC 2 2 0 0 16 0 16 1468 1484 Gurei CTC (changed to ORP) Closed 28 July 2 0 2 365 367 Tongping CTC 0 2 1 3 69 72 Closed August Jube 3/UN House CTC Closed August 0 0 0 0 97 97 Nyakuron West CTC Closed 15 July 0 0 0 18 18 Gumbo CTC Closed 5 July 0 0 0 48 48 Nyakuron ORP Closed 5 July 0 0 0 20 20 Munuki ORP Closed 5 July 0 0 0 8 8 Gumbo ORP Closed 15 July 0 3 3 67 70 Pager PHCU 0 0 0 0 1 5 6 42 48 Other sites 0 0 0 1 15 16 1 17 Total 2 2 0 0 22 24 46 2203 2249 N.B. To prevent double counting of patients, transferred cases from ORPs to CTCs are not counted in the ORPs. Table 2: Summary of cholera cases reported outside Juba County, 23 April – 12 October 2014 New New New Total cases Total Total admisions discharges deaths Total Total cases Total States Reporting Sites currently facility community 6 to 12 Oct 6 to 12 Oct 6 to 12 deaths discharged cases admitted deaths deaths 2014 2014 Oct 2014 Kajo-Keji civil hospital 0 0 0 0 3 4 7 86 93 CES Yei Hospital -- 0 0 0 0 2 2 45 47 WES Lanyi- Mundri East -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 Jonglei Kolmanyang, Bor -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Nimule Hospital 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 106 OTC PHCC, Magwi -- 0 0 0 10 0 10 141 151 Magwi PHCC 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 12 18 Pajok PHCC, Magwi -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Nyolo CTC, Magwi 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 Idali PHCU, Lafon -- 0 0 0 5 1 6 90 96 Lwala PHCU, Pachidi -- 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 payam, Lafon Longiro PHCU,Lafon -- 0 0 0 1 0 1 15 16 Lalanga PHCU, Lafon 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 63 65 EES Torit Hospital 0 0 0 0 8 9 17 1407 1424 Bur Mutram PHCU, -- 0 0 0 0 1 1 59 60 Bur Payam, Torit Ohiri PHCC, Bur -- 0 0 0 3 0 3 53 56 Payam, Torit Ohila PHCC, Bur -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 24 Payam, Torit Imurok PHCU, Imurok -- 0 0 0 2 1 3 10 13 Payam, Torit Hiyala PHCC, Torit -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 86 Olere PHCU, Imurok -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 Payam, Torit Osito PHCU, Bur -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 42 payam, Torit 1 New New New Total cases Total Total admisions discharges deaths Total Total cases Total States Reporting Sites currently facility community 6 to 12 Oct 6 to 12 Oct 6 to 12 deaths discharged cases admitted deaths deaths 2014 2014 Oct 2014 Ileu PHCU, Hiyala -- 0 0 0 3 7 10 147 157 payam, Torit Hileu PHCC, Himodonge Payam, -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 Torit Ofiri PHCU, Kudo -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 Payam, Torit Kudo PHCC, Kudo -- 0 0 0 1 0 1 54 55 Payam, Torit Moti PHCU, Ifwotu, -- 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 7 Torit Riwoto PHCC, Kapoeta 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 82 83 North SSRCORPs, Nyong -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 70 70 Payam, Torit St. Theresa, Isohe, 0 0 0 0 2 2 4 93 102 Ikotos Ibahure PHCC, ibahure 0 0 0 1 0 1 23 25 Payam, Lopa/Lafon Other sites -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 24 Kaka -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Wau Shilluk, Malakal -- 0 0 0 15 2 17 885 906 Upper Nile Malakal PoC -- 0 0 0 2 0 2 59 61 Other sites -- 0 0 0 2 0 2 55 57 Total 0 0 0 0 60 33 93 3780 3892 x: Facilities not reporting; -- no cases reported for at least two weeks Figure 1: South Sudan Cholera Epidemic Curve, week 17-41, 2014 1200 1000 800 No No Cases 600 400 200 0 Epidemiological week 2014 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 Figure 2: Cholera Case DistributioWESn by Age, Sex, UNS& State – week 17EES-41, 2014 CES 2500 2000 964 1041 1500 Male Female 1000 375 1031 876 294 240 214 500 186 318 207 274 3 10 1 0 <5yrs ≥5yrs (blank) <5yrs ≥5yrs (blank) <5yrs ≥5yrs ≥5yrs CES EES UNS WES 2 Surveillance and laboratory During week 41, only two new cholera cases were reported from Lologo and Kator villages in Kator Payam, Juba County. There were no new cases reported from Torit, Magwi, and Kapoeta North Counties in Eastern Equatoria. As seen from Figure 1, the cholera trend is on the decline in all the five states where cholera has been confirmed. No new culture positive cases reported during week 41. Overall, 187 (43.4%) of the samples tested have been positive for cholera by culture. Due to the declining cholera trend, it is recommended that all new suspect cholera cases have samples obtained for laboratory confirmation. Case management The two cases were treated at Juba Teaching Hospital cholera treatment centre and they both improved on treatment and were discharged by 12 October 2014. Adequate supplies have been availed to support case management activities in the cholera treatment centres where the cases are being treated. WASH WASH efforts and responses are ongoing in Central and Eastern Equatoria states where some AWD cases are still being reported in some areas. Central Equatoria State In Lobonok Payam: Partners conducted awareness campaigns at three churches, namely, St. Matthew, St. Mary and St. Francis as well as 256 pupils at Yapa Secondary School in Kapota. Targeted distribution of hygiene kits at Kapota center continues. An emergency pit latrine was constructed at Pager Health center. Eastern Equatoria State In Torit County: House to house hygiene promotion is still on-going to raise community awareness on water handling and hand- washing at critical times. Hygiene promotion through a weekly radio talk show continues to reinforce the house to house hygiene promotion. Safe water supply through the water treatment units and repair of hand pumps is ongoing. In Lopa-Lafon County. A team has been deployed to strengthen and continue cholera awareness and community mobilization activities to reduce the risk of new case in the county, which was severely affected. In North Kapoeta County A security assessment is in progress with partners planning to send a WASH team for an initial assessment and response in mid-October. Gaps and needs Case management, surveillance and laboratory • Submission of updated cholera line lists to the Ministry of Health needs to be strengthened • Cholera treatment centres should submit samples from new cases for laboratory testing. This will guide decisions on the end of outbreak declarations in the affected counties. Conclusions and Recommendations Overall, cholera is on the decline countrywide. The following are the key recommendations: • Samples should be collected from all new suspect cases and submitted to the National Public Health Reference Laboratory for testing. This will allow the taskforce to determine if cholera has been controlled in the affected areas. • Sustain interventions to for cholera prevention and control in all the affected counties. • Evaluate the overall response to the cholera outbreak so as to document experiences and lessons learnt for improving future response. • Update development plans to ensure that areas at high-risk for cholera are prioritised for risk communications and other evidence based interventions for improving the construction and use of appropriate sanitary facilities and improving access to safe water. Please note that the Cholera Situation Report is being discontinued. This is the last report. Subsequent updates will appear in the Ministry of Health weekly disease surveillance bulletins. 3 Many thanks to the staff at CTCs, MoH at national level and state levels, especially the Department of IDSR, who have helped to gather the information presented here. Situation Reports are posted on the WHO website: http://www.who.int/hac/crises/ssd/en/no as well as on the Humanitarian Info webpage: http://southsudan.humanitarianresponse.info/clusters/health. The MoH/WHO surveillance team welcomes feedback and data provided by individual agencies. Given the fast evolving nature of this epidemic, errors and omissions are inevitable: we will be grateful for any information that helps to rectify these. Send any comments and feedback to: E-mail: [email protected], The Toll free numbers for alerts are: Gemtel: 9999, Vivacell: 0952000098 and Zain: 0912000098. Contacts For more information please contact: Dr. John P. Rumunu Dr. Thomas Akim Ujjiga Director General - Preventive Health Services Ag. Director - IDSR MoH, Republic of South Sudan MoH, Republic of South Sudan Tel: +211955668178 Tel: +211955150406 4.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mining in South Sudan: Opportunities and Risks for Local Communities
    » REPORT JANUARY 2016 MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN: OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS FOR LOCAL COMMUNITIES BASELINE ASSESSMENT OF SMALL-SCALE AND ARTISANAL GOLD MINING IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EQUATORIA STATES, SOUTH SUDAN MINING IN SOUTH SUDAN FOREWORD We are delighted to present you the findings of an assessment conducted between February and May 2015 in two states of South Sudan. With this report, based on dozens of interviews, focus group discussions and community meetings, a multi-disciplinary team of civil society and government representatives from South Sudan are for the first time shedding light on the country’s artisanal and small-scale mining sector. The picture that emerges is a remarkable one: artisanal gold mining in South Sudan ‘employs’ more than 60,000 people and might indirectly benefit almost half a million people. The vast majority of those involved in artisanal mining are poor rural families for whom alluvial gold mining provides critical income to supplement their subsistence livelihood of farming and cattle rearing. Ostensibly to boost income for the cash-strapped government, artisanal mining was formalized under the Mining Act and subsequent Mineral Regulations. However, owing to inadequate information-sharing and a lack of government mining sector staff at local level, artisanal miners and local communities are not aware of these rules. In reality there is almost no official monitoring of artisanal or even small-scale mining activities. Despite the significant positive impact on rural families’ income, the current form of artisanal mining does have negative impacts on health, the environment and social practices. With most artisanal, small-scale and exploration mining taking place in rural areas with abundant small arms and limited presence of government security forces, disputes over land access and ownership exacerbate existing conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP)
    FY 2015 South Sudan Country Operational Plan (COP) The following elements included in this document, in addition to “Budget and Target Reports” posted separately on www.PEPFAR.gov, reflect the approved FY 2015 COP for South Sudan. 1) FY 2015 COP Strategic Development Summary (SDS) narrative communicates the epidemiologic and country/regional context; methods used for programmatic design; findings of integrated data analysis; and strategic direction for the investments and programs. Note that PEPFAR summary targets discussed within the SDS were accurate as of COP approval and may have been adjusted as site- specific targets were finalized. See the “COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit” sheets that follow for final approved targets. 2) COP 15 Targets by Subnational Unit includes approved COP 15 targets (targets to be achieved by September 30, 2016). As noted, these may differ from targets embedded within the SDS narrative document and reflect final approved targets. Approved FY 2015 COP budgets by mechanism and program area, and summary targets are posted as a separate document on www.PEPFAR.gov in the “FY 2015 Country Operational Plan Budget and Target Report.” South Sudan Country/Regional Operational Plan (COP/ROP) 2015 Strategic Direction Summary August 27, 2015 Table of Contents Goal Statement 1.0 Epidemic, Response, and Program Context 1.1 Summary statistics, disease burden and epidemic profile 1.2 Investment profile 1.3 Sustainability Profile 1.4 Alignment of PEPFAR investments geographically to burden of disease 1.5 Stakeholder engagement
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Crop Watch Updated to 2Nd Dekad of July 2015
    South Sudan Crop Watch Updated to 2nd dekad of July 2015 Disclaimer: The authors of the working paper would like to acknowledge the technical difficulties in conducting this analysis within a highly complex context. This report provides a first step in understanding the status of food crops in South Sudan. The information and views set out in this working paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of FAO. In Greater Equatoria, production prospects for first season crops to be harvested in August/September are mixed, due to dry weather conditions affecting several areas. Planted area severely reduced in most conflict-affected counties due to worsening security conditions and massive displacement. This document aims to periodically provide a general outlook on the condition of food crops in South Sudan. The analysis is based on several remote sensing products, such as the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the Vegetation Health Index (VHI) and, in particular, the FAO Agricultural Stress Index (ASI)1. The peculiarity of ASI is to focus on water stress specifically in agricultural areas, while other remote sensing products cover vegetation and rainfall across the country. The information from satellite imagery is then cross-checked with evidence from the field – e.g. crop planting and harvest assessments - along with data on rainfall amounts provided by several automatic weather stations and rain gauges located across the country. The lack of long-term series of rainfall data as well as problems to access information in most conflict-affected areas limit the depth of the analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria
    South Sudan water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria January 2021 South Sudan WASH Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria Cover photo credit: Gatbel Chany, 2021 About REACH REACH facilitates the development of information tools and products that enhance the capacity of aid actors to make evidence-based decisions in emergency, recovery and development contexts. The methodologies used by REACH include primary data collection and in-depth analysis, and all activities are conducted through inter-agency aid coordination mechanisms. REACH is a joint initiative of IMPACT Initiatives, ACTED and the United Nations Institute for Training and Research - Operational Satellite Applications Programme (UNITAR-UNOSAT). For more information please visit our website: www.reach-initiative.org. You can contact us directly at: geneva@reach- initiative.org and follow us on Twitter @REACH_info. 1 South Sudan WASH Report — Lakes State, Western and Eastern Equatoria CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 3 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................................... 4 FINDINGS .................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Access to water ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights On
    A/HRC/28/49 Advance Unedited Version Distr.: General 9 March 2015 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty-eighth session Agenda items 2 and 10 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Technical assistance and capacity-building Report on the human rights situation in South Sudan Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights* Summary The present report is submitted pursuant to the Human Rights Council resolution 26/31, requesting the High Commissioner for Human Rights to monitor the human rights situation in South Sudan and to report thereon to the Council at its twenty-eighth session, with recommendations on technical assistance measures, including on human rights education, to overcome challenges in the areas of security, accountability and transitional justice. This report was prepared in cooperation with the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS), and covers the period from 15 August to 15 December 2014. At the Council’s twenty-seventh session in September 2014, the High Commissioner submitted a report on the situation of human rights in South Sudan covering the period from 8 May to 8 August 2014. The situation of human rights in South Sudan remained of serious concern during the reporting period. Civilians continued to bear the brunt of the ongoing armed conflict and of their leaders’ failure to stop the fighting. While the scale and severity of the conflict declined, the numbers of civilians displaced across the country has continued to rise, with no likelihood that people will be able to return to their homes soon.
    [Show full text]
  • Burden of Trachoma in Five Counties of Eastern Equatoria State, South Sudan: Results from Population-Based Surveys
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Burden of trachoma in five counties of Eastern Equatoria state, South Sudan: Results from population-based surveys Angelia M. Sanders1*, Aisha E. P. Stewart1, Samuel Makoy2, Joy J. Chebet3, Peter Magok3, Aja Kuol2, Carla Blauvelt3, Richard Lako2, John Rumunu2, E. Kelly Callahan1, Scott D. Nash1 1 Trachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, 2 South Sudan Ministry of Health, Government of the Republic of South Sudan, Juba, Republic of South Sudan, 3 The Carter a1111111111 Center-South Sudan, The Carter Center, Juba, Republic of South Sudan a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 a1111111111 Abstract Background OPEN ACCESS In order to decrease the prevalence of trachoma within the country, the Republic of South Citation: Sanders AM, Stewart AEP, Makoy S, Sudan has implemented components of the SAFE strategy in various counties since 2001. Chebet JJ, Magok P, Kuol A, et al. (2017) Burden of trachoma in five counties of Eastern Equatoria Five counties in Eastern Equatoria state were surveyed in order to monitor progress of pro- state, South Sudan: Results from population-based grammatic interventions and determine if additional rounds of Mass Drug Administration surveys. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11(6): e0005658. with azithromycin were needed. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0005658 Editor: Mathieu Picardeau, Institut Pasteur, Methodology/ Principal findings FRANCE Five counties (Budi, Lafon, Kapoeta East, Kapoeta South and Kapoeta North) were surveyed Received: December 19, 2016 from April to October 2015. A cross-sectional, multi-stage, cluster-random sampling was Accepted: May 23, 2017 used. All present, consenting residents of selected households were examined for all clinical Published: June 14, 2017 signs of trachoma using the World Health Organization (WHO) simplified grading system.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth LEAD Baseline Assessment
    Youth LEAD Baseline Assessment Eastern Equatoria, Upper Nile & Jonglei States Prepared for UNICEF South Sudan Conducted by Forcier Consulting Youth LEAD Baseline Assessment: Eastern Equatoria Upper Nile Jonglei Prepared for: UNICEF South Sudan Prepared by: Natalie Forcier Nadia Kevlin Evan Callis Benedicte Bakkeskau Amy Hall June 2012 Acknowledgements The cooperation and assistance of several organizations and individuals were crucial in the implementation of this baseline assessment, and thus the research team would like to extend their sincere gratitude to the following: H.E. Brigadier General Louis Lobong Lojore, Governor of Eastern Equatoria State H.E. Titos Lokwacuma Loteam, Commissioner of Kapoeta East County H.E. Joseph Napengiro Lokolong, Commissioner of Budi County H.E. Kuol Manyang Juuk, Governor of Jonglei State H.E. Colonel Isaac Kuach Duoth, Commissioner of Nyirol County H.E. Tut Puok Nyang, Commissioner of Uror County H.E. Brigadier General Simon Kun Puoch, Governor of Upper Nile State H.E. Dak Tap Chuol, Commissioner of Nasir County H.E. Peter Chuol Biel, Commissioner of Ulang County Pelucy Ntambirweki, UNICEF Fred Ogwal, UNICEF Jairus Ligoo, UNICEF Sophie Busi, UNICEF Finally, on behalf of Forcier Consulting and the research team, I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to the citizens who volunteered their time to participate in this important assessment. Natalie Forcier Managing Director Forcier Consulting July 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Situation Monitoring Central and Eastern Equatoria States - South Sudan April - September 2020
    Humanitarian Situation Monitoring Central and Eastern Equatoria States - South Sudan April - September 2020 Introduction Map 1: REACH assessment coverage of the CES and EES, April (A), June (B) and September The second (Q2) and third (Q3) quarter of 2020, were largely defined by restricted cross-border (C) 2020 and inter-state movement as a COVID-19 preventive measure, climatic changes, and pockets of insecurity, as well as continuing currency depreciation and rising prices on the market. These A B developments have likely continued to drive humanitarian needs across Central Equatoria State (CES) and Eastern Equatoria State (EES). As insufficient regular assessments are conducted in these regions due to access and resource constraints, limited accurate information is available to humanitarian actors to inform their response. To inform humanitarian actors, REACH has conducted assessments of hard-to-reach areas in South Sudan since December 2015. Data is collected on a monthly basis through interviews with key informants with knowledge of a settlement. This Situation Overview uses this data to analyse changes in observed humanitarian needs across CES and EES in the second and third quarter of 2020. Methodology C To provide an indicative overview of the situation in hard-to-reach areas of Central and Eastern Equatoria States, REACH conducts interviews with key informants (KIs) who have recently arrived from, recently visited, or receive regular information from a settlement or “Area of Knowledge” (AoK). Information for this report was collected from key informants in Kapoeta Town covering EES and remotely by phone call from Juba covering CES, between April and September 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Equatoria State SOUTH SUDAN
    COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Eastern Equatoria State SOUTH SUDAN Bureau for Community Security South Sudan Peace and Small Arms Control and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme The Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control under the Ministry of Interior is the Government agency of South Sudan mandated to address the threats posed by the proliferation of small arms and community insecurity to peace and development. The South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission is mandated to promote peaceful co-existence amongst the people of South Sudan and advises the Government on matters related to peace. The United Nations Development Programme in South Sudan, through the Community Security and Arms Control Project, supports the Bureau strengthen its capacity in the area of community security and arms control at the national, state, and county levels. Cover photo: © UNDP COMMUNITY CONSULTATION REPORT Eastern Equatoria State South Sudan Published by: South Sudan Bureau for Community Security and Small Arms Control South Sudan Peace and Reconciliation Commission United Nations Development Programme MAY 2012 JUBA, SOUTH SUDAN CONTENTS Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... i Foreword ........................................................................................................................... .ii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Humanitarian Situation Monitoring Eastern Equatoria State - South Sudan October - December 2020
    Humanitarian Situation Monitoring Eastern Equatoria State - South Sudan October - December 2020 Introduction Map 1: REACH assessment coverage of the EES, October (A), November (B) and December The last quarter (Q4) of 2020 was characterised by cross-border movement and food insecurity (C) 2020: driven by insecurity, flooding and declined crop production. Climatic changes further affected access to basic services, such as clean drinking water and solid shelter structures, and insecurity A B hindered people accessing markets and preferred water sources. In addition, COVID-19 related restrictions continued to negatively impact access to basic services, increasing the vulnerability of people living in Eastern Equatoria State (EES) and their need of humanitarian assistance. Kaoeta Kaoeta North afon Kaoeta ast afon North As insufficient regular assessments are conducted across the region due to access and resource Kaoeta ast constraints, limited accurate information is available to humanitarian actors to inform their response. Kaoeta outh Kaoeta outh To inform humanitarian actors, REACH has conducted assessments of hard-to-reach areas in Torit Budi Torit Budi otos South Sudan since December 2015. Data is collected on a monthly basis through interviews with otos awi key informants (KIs) with knowledge of a settlement. This Situation Overview uses this data to awi analyse changes in observed humanitarian needs across EES in Q4 of 2020. Methodology C To provide an indicative overview of the situation in hard-to-reach areas of CES, REACH Kaoeta conducts interviews with KIs who have recently arrived from, recently visited, or receive afon North Kaoeta regular information from a settlement or “Area of Knowledge” (AoK).
    [Show full text]
  • Key Informant Interview Check List
    South Sudan Annual Needs and Livelihoods Assessment, 2009/2010 Eastern Equatoria State Report A collaborative assessment by: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MOAF) World Food Programme (WFP) Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Southern Sudan Relief and Rehabilitation Commission (SSRRC) CARITAS Swiss and Luxembourg Lutheran World Federation (LWF) Catholic Relief Services Sudan Programme (CRS) United Ministry of Food & South Sudan South Sudan Luthern CARITAS Swiss Catholic Relief Nations Agriculture Agriculture Commission Relief & World and Luxembourg Services Sudan World food Rehabilitation Organization for Census, Rehabilitation Federation Programme Programme and Forestry Statistics and Commission Evaluation NOTE ON MAPS The boundaries and names shown on the maps and tables and which appear in the narrative of this document are approximate and do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. The maps were produced by the Vulnerability Analysis and Mapping (VAM) Unit of WFP South Sudan. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS WFP and FAO are greatly indebted to all the ministries, NGOs, UN agencies, local authorities and individuals who participated in planning and conducting this assessment, and provided information that formed the basis of this report. ii LIST OF ACRONYMS ANLA Annual Needs and Livelihoods Assessment CFSAM Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission CRS Catholic Relief Services FAO Food and Agriculture Organization IDP Internally Displaced Person LWF Lutheran World Federation SMAARF State Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Resources and Forestry NDVI Normalized Difference Vegetation Index NCA Norwegian Church Aid NGO Non Governmental Organization RRC Relief and Rehabilitatio Commission(UNMIS) SDG Sudanese Pound SSRRC South Sudan Relief and Reconstruction Commission UN United Nations UNMIS United Mission in Sudan VAM Vulnerability Analysis and Mapping WFP World Food Programme iii 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of South Sudan EARLY WARNING and DISEASE
    Early Warning and Disease Surveillance System Republic of South Sudan EARLY WARNING AND DISEASE SURVEILLANCE BULLETIN (IDP CAMPS AND COMMUNITIES) Week 43 20 October – 26 October 2014 General Overview Completeness for weekly reporting increased from 66% to 82% while timeliness increased from 36% to 54% in week 43 when compared to week 42. Malaria remains the top cause of morbidity with Malakal, Tongping, UN House, Renk, and Melut reporting the highest incidence in week 43. Malakal PoC had the highest incidence for Malaria, ARI, AWD, and ABD during week 43; highlighting the need to enhance communicable disease prevention and control interventions in the PoC. Sixteen measles cases were reported from Melut (11 cases), Lankien (4 cases), and Mingkaman (1 case). One new probable HEV case was reported in Bentiu PoC in week 43. The cumulative for HEV is 113 cases and 4 deaths (CFR 3.7%) after one new case was reported from Mingkaman in week 43. Forty seven cholera cases and two deaths were reported from Lobonok in Juba, Central Equatoria State, as well as Lofus, Lorum and Imatong in Ikotos County; Ohilang and Ibele in Lopa-Lafon County; and Kapoeta South Town in Eastern Equatoria State in week 43. The cumulative stands at 6,297 cases with 160 deaths (CFR 2.26%). Kala-azar trend continues to surge to its seasonal peak with 5,713 cases and 163 deaths reported this year. The under-five and crude mortality rates in all IDP sites were below the emergency threshold in week 43. Completeness and Timeliness of Reporting Completeness for weekly reporting increased from 33 (66%) in week 42, to 41 (82%) in week 43.
    [Show full text]