Arxiv:1901.06959V1 [Physics.Atom-Ph] 21 Jan 2019 Some Care, Understood As a Potential Signature of NP
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The g factor of bound electrons as a test for physics beyond the Standard Model V. Debierre,∗ C. H. Keitel, and Z. Harmany Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics, Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg The use of high-precision measurements of the g factor of few-electron ions and its isotope shifts is put forward as a probe for physics beyond the Standard Model. The contribution of a hypothetical fifth fundamental force to the g factor is calculated for the ground state of H-like, Li-like and B-like ions, and employed to derive bounds on the parameters of that force. The weighted difference and especially the isotope shift of g factors are used in order to increase the experimental sensitivity to the new physics contribution. It is found that, combining measurements from four different isotopes of H-like, Li-like and B-like calcium ions at currently accessible accuracy levels, experimental results compatible with King planarity would constrain the new physics coupling constant more than one order of magnitude further than the best current atomic data. The g factors of the free electon and free muon have boson.|New scalar bosons have been proposed as a so- served as precision tests for quantum electrodynamics lution to the long-standing electroweak hierarchy prob- (QED), the Standard Model (SM) more broadly, and pos- lem [36]. These massive scalar bosons would carry a fifth sible extensions of the SM [1{7]. In parallel, recent years force, resulting in an interaction between neutrons and have seen rapid improvements in the experimental [8{12] electrons, by coupling to both particle types in a spin- and theoretical [13{21] determination of the g factor of independent way [32, 33, 35]. The potential exerted on bound electrons (for reviews, see Refs. [22, 23]), owing electrons by this hypothetical force is of the Yukawa type to the accelerating development of bound-state quantum [34]: field theory [13{21, 24{27]. This allows for stringent tests m c − φ jrj of QED in strong fields, and, to a lesser extent, other sec- e ~ Vφ (r) = −~c αNP (A − Z) ; (1) tors of the SM, and can hence be a route for the discovery jrj of phenomena beyond the SM. In the present work, we where mφ is the mass of the boson, αNP = yeyn=4π is demonstrate the relevance of the g factor of bound elec- the new-physics coupling constant, with ye and yn the trons to the search for new physics (NP). A relatively coupling of the massive scalar boson to the electrons and direct method consists in comparing the best available the neutrons, respectively, ~ and c are Planck's reduced theoretical and experimental results, the largest differ- constant and the vacuum velocity of light, and Z and ence between which allowed by the uncertainties, pro- A are the number of protons and the total number of vides a bound for the NP contribution to the g factor. nucleons in the nucleus of the considered ion. With this method, we also use data on weighted differ- The first-order correction to the g factor of a bound ences of g factors of ions in different charge states [28{31]. electron in the quantum state a due to this potential is Another method is centered on the isotope shift. Preci- given by the diagram in Fig.1, together with the one sion spectroscopy of the isotope shifts in optical transi- in which the order of the two interactions is swapped. tion frequencies in ions has recently been used [32{35] Together they yield to examine hypothetical new fundamental forces. When Z +1 m c specific candidates for forces are considered, this exam- ~c − φ r ination of the isotope shift provides a more direct route ∆ga = −2αNP (A − Z) dr r e ~ µ0Bma 0 to test NP than do high-precision QED calculations. In this work, we generalize this method to g-factor preci- × ga (r) Xa (r) + fa (r) Ya (r) ; (2) sion spectroscopy. Considering four different isotopes of a given ion and two different electronic states, a spe- where µ0 = e~=2me is the Bohr magneton, ma the mag- cific feature in the yet-to-be-obtained g-factor isotope- netic projection quantum number of state a, B the mag- shift data, known as King nonplanarity, could be, with arXiv:1901.06959v1 [physics.atom-ph] 21 Jan 2019 some care, understood as a potential signature of NP. For this conclusion to be warranted, it would need to be assumed that the hypothetical force considered here dom- inates over other beyond-SM contributions. Conversely, a lack of King nonplanarity in the data would allow the FIG. 1. Feynman diagram corresponding to the hypothetical setting of competitive bounds on NP. In order to obtain NP contribution to the g factor of a bound electron. The bounds on the NP parameters, we first derive the correc- double line represents the bound electron, the wavy line ter- tion to the bound-electron g factor due to a hypothetical minated by a triangle denotes a photon from the external fifth force. magnetic field, and the dashed line terminated by a square Correction to the g factor due to a massive scalar denotes a scalar boson from the nuclear neutrons. 2 nitude of the external, static, homogeneous magnetic as in the 1s and 2p1=2 states [29]. These are given [29{ field, and Xa and Ya the corrections to the large (ga) and 31, 39, 40] by small (fa) components of the bound electron radial wave function, due to the interaction with the magnetic field, δξs g = g2s − ξsg1s; δξp g = g2p1=2 − ξpg1s; (5a) given in Ref. [37]. For the H-like ground state a = 1s, we 3 ξ = 2−(1+2γ) 1 + (Zα)2 ; (5b) obtain s 16 −2γ −(5+2γ) 2 35 2 4 (Zα) mφ ξp = 2 3 (Zα) 1 + (Zα) : (5c) ∆g1s = − αNP (A − Z) 1 + 256 3 γ 2Zαme " # (Zα)2 2γ In the weighted difference, the finite nuclear size correc- × 3 − 2 − : (3) 1 + γ 1 + mφ tions almost entirely cancel each other, through a careful 2Zαme choice of the ξ coefficients. Using the combined experi- The full exact results for the a = 2s ground state of Li- mental and theoretical data on the 1s{2s weighted differ- ence in 28Si13+ from Refs. [30, 31], we exclude the dark like ions, and for the a = 2p1=2 ground state of B-like ions, are given in the Supplemental Material. However, green area ([Wagner+Yerokhin]) in Fig.2. Here, QED 4 common asymptotics for all s states can be given for theory can be improved [30, 41] up to a factor of 10 simplicity in the nonrelativistic limit: in the intermediate (yielding the bound represented by the lower solid gray curve (Proj. Si11+=13+ WD) if the agreement with ex- mass regime Zαme mφ ~=rN c (rN is the nuclear radius), we derive periments remains at that level of precision) before the theoretical uncertainty becomes dominated by the finite 16 Zα nuclear size correction. This represents a promising av- ∆gnonrel ' − α (A − Z) ns 3 NP n3 enue for the setting of more stringent bounds on NP. 2 Isotope shifts and the King representation.|We now m m × Zα e 3 − 16 Zα e ; (4a) turn to the analysis of isotope shifts. Consider two states mφ mφ 1 and 2 of a bound electron in an ion. For both states, considering two isotopes A and A0 of the same ion, we while in the small mass regime mφ Zαme, we obtain write [43] the isotope shift in the g factor as 4 Zα nonrel 0 0 ∆gns ' − αNP (A − Z) : (4b) AA A A 3 n2 gi = gi − gi ; i 2 f1; 2g : (6) With the help of our exact results, we will set bounds In the SM, the isotope shift is given at the leading order on NP in what follows. The free parameters to be con- in the electron-to-nucleus mass ratios me=MA(0) and the strained are the coupling constant αNP and the boson 2 nuclear radii r A(0) by mass mφ. Tests with g factors and their weighted difference.|A AA0 2 gi(SM) = Ki µAA0 + Fi δ r 0 ; (7) first set of bounds can be obtained straightforwardly, by AA considering that the NP contribution to the g factor is where µAA0 = 1=MA −1=MA0 . The first summand on the bounded by current uncertainties on the g factor. Let us r.h.s. is the mass shift, originating from the difference be- 28 13+ consider the case of H-like Si . Using Eq. (3) and tween the masses MA and MA0 of the two isotopes. The the difference ∆g ' 1:7 × 10−9 [10, 20] between theory second summand is the field shift, and originates from and experiment (we take the maximum difference allowed 2 2 2 the difference δ r AA0 = r A − r A0 in the nuclear by the uncertainties, making use of the updated electron charge radii between the two isotopes. The only quanti- mass uncertainty [11]), we exclude the larger gray re- ties that depend on the specific electronic level considered gion ([Sturm+Theory]) in Fig.2. The current theoret- are explicitly referred to as such by the label i. Notice ical uncertainties are 3 × 10−11 from the finite nuclear that radiative QED corrections to the g factor are largely size correction [38], and 6 × 10−10 from QED radiative absent from the isotope shift, as they are approximately corrections [20], meaning that improvement of the QED the same for all isotopes of a given ion.