Nuclear Power for Vancouver Island

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nuclear Power for Vancouver Island NUCLEAR POWER FOR VANCOUVER ISLAND i •• • .. •. ;^ ; At the requc Canada limited generation of m NUCLEAR POWER FOR VANCOUVER ISLAND At the request of the Greater Nanaimo Chamber of Commerce, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited has been most happy to prepare these notes on many aspects of the generation of nuclear power on Vancouver Island. The 23 topics are as listed in the letter of Mr. David D. Hart, President of the Chamber, which is reproduced herewith. ; Our study shows that Vancouver Island is a logical area for the application of nuclear power. - . • We would be glad to try to answer any questions arising from these notes, or to refer . those interested to AECL or other publications giving more detailed information on specific subjects. •- - Ji. Gray President Atomic Energy of Canada Limited, • - ,275 Slater Street, . ; , - Ottawa; Ontario . ' -'-.,',' Í K1A0S4 , ,'•'••• • ? fii 2nd edition Covtr photo show« th« Douglw Point N,icl»ar Ganaiiting Station which i« part of tha Bruca Nuclaar Pcwyar Daválopmant on Laka - Huron.-' ,•'*•• '• " ~•-, > . ° I • ".'. ,,\ % INDEX List of Illustrations 2 Summary 3 Explanatory Notes and Abbreviations 4 How a Nuclear Plant Works .: 5 Letter from Mr. David D. Hart 8 Topics Suggested by Greater Nanaimo Chamber of Commerce 9 ILLUSTRATIONS i i;i Fig. No. Page I ii 1 Comparison of Nuclear with Conventional Power 5 I 2 Flow diagram of Nuclear Power Plant 5 !| 3, 540 MW Turbo-Generator. 5 I - 4 Pickering Nuclear Generating Station 6 )| , 5 Douglas Point Nuclear Generating Station 6 if 6 . Map showing Canadian Atomic Energy Establishments 7 I •-"-"• p. 7 Burrard Thermal Generating Plant 7 I 8 Ontario Hydro's Nuclear Training Centre for Operators 15 9 NPD Generating Station • • • I6 -' ' 10 Effects of Inflation on Power Costs 18 11 Fuel Bundle;. 22 12 FuelCycles 23 ~~- -'" -" " i3 Cüt-awàydrawing of'Nuclear Power Plant. 27 14 i. Bruce Heavy Water Plant , 28 15- CANDUConcepts... ...._.........; 33 16. End of Voyage.. '.'...:>., ••., 35 SLií.. fts *JU. w.^.^_.-* -SUMMARY This brief study indicates that: — Vancouver Island appears to be a logical area for the application of nuclear power. — The cost of power from a nucleat plant on the Island would be less than that from any of the alternatives understood to be currently under consideration; inflation of the costs of conventional fuel will increase the differentiafduring the life of the plant. — The effects on the environment would be less than for any alternative source of power. The level of radioactivity found in the environment, especially outside the exclusion area, as a result of reactor operations would be a small fraction ofthat existing prior to startup of the nuclear plant. The effects of the thermal discharge depend somewhat on the site chosen, but would be unlikely to be detectable more than 'A to 'A mile from the site, and within this distance are more likely to be desirable than otherwise. No other environmental effects are involved. — A nuclear power unit of up to 600 MW (600,000 kilowatts) would fit in with existing power sources on the Island. Existing hydro plants and undersea cables to the mainland would help to even the load on the nuclear plant, and provide power when it was necessary to shut down the nuclear plant for maintenance. Future increases in power demands could be met equally economically by adding nuclear units at the site of the first unit. — A significant portion of the expenditure on a nuclear plant would go to local and provincial labour, material supplies, manufactured components, operator training and engineering. ' — The first unit would require an operating staff of about 135; close to 300 new permanent jobs would be created in the community in which the plant was located." EXPLANATORY NOTES AND. ABBREVIATIONS H AECB: The (Canadian) Atomic Energy Control Board represents the Federal Govern- ment in regulatory matters pertaining to the licensing and safety aspects of nuclear energy. AECL: Atomic Energy of Canada Limited is a Crown Corporation, formed in 1952 to ht take over the operation of the Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories from the National (a Research Council and to further the development of nuclear power and other uses of ai nuclear energy. It operates research laboratories at Chalk River, Ontario, and Pinawa, be Manitoba, and an engineering office and laboratories at Sheridan Park, near Toronto. he Fig. 6 indicates the location of these establishments. te fossil fuel: Refers to coal, oil or natural gas. fr< sn kWh: Kilowatt-hour, a basic unit of electrical energy. The average yearly consumption of re electricity per person in Canada in 1969 was 3,893 kWh. he milis/kWh: Used to express the cost of electricity. A mill in this sense is one-tenth of a P« cent. The cost of transmitting electric power to Vancouver Island from the mainland is m about 2 mSs/kWh, in addition to the cost of generating it. tu MWe or MW: Megawatts electrical. A megawatt is 1,000 kilowatts. The maximum Pi electrical power available on Vancouver Island is about 980 MWe, of which about 540 de MWe can be transmitted from the mainland via the submarine cable from Tsawwassen. ne A likely size for the first nuclear power plant unit on the Island might be 600 MWe. so The heat generated in a reactor is measured in thermal megawatts (MWt). Most nuclear power systems convert about 30% of this heat into electrical energy, the "thermal H; efficiency" being limited by the maximum temperature at which heat can be ge transported from the reactor and by the cooHng water temperature. fa Hydro-Electric Power Commission of Ontario (Ontario Hydro): supplies almost all of the electric power used in Ontario, and frequently exports some to New York State. In addition to hydro and coal-fired steam plants, and a 200 MWe nuclear prototype plant at Douglas Point in operation, it has under construction two-large 4-unit nuclear stations known as Pickering and Bruce. The first three 500 MWe Pickering units are. operating in an exceptionally satisfactory manner,, and the 4th unit will be brought into operation in 1973. The four Bruce units, of 750 MWe each, will be started up about a year apart commencing in 1975. Similar or larger generating stations are in the Fig. 2- planning stage. Present generating capacity is over. 13,000 MW. ~ - powerpl Quebec Hydro-Electric Commission (Hydro-Quebec): supplies electric power for almost ; all of the Province of Quebec. Most of this is generated from water-power. The Commission operates one prototype nuclear unit rated at 250. MWe at Gentilly, which is in the process,,of being brought up to full power. If the James Bay hydro, development is carried through, Hydro-Quebec may build one'or two nuclear plants to provide'power in the interim but a full-scale nuclear power program, would not be required until the mid-1980s. ~ 'I . ,: ''_• rem: This is a unit of radiation effectively absorbed in man. If'a man were to stand in a radiation field such that he absorbed one rem in one hour, the,dose rate in the field is Fis.3- 1 rem per hour. Similarly,'if he had to stand in a radiation field for 100 hours to sett of 1 absorb 1 rem, the field would be l/100th rerirper hour. In each case he would have TiMCOIK absorbed one man-rem^The natural radiation on this continent averages about 0.13 rem per year. Statistical studies of large populations that have existed in natural radiation fields of up to a dozen times this figure have failed to reveal any discernible " - 'effect. • " .,.'.-'-. • . .", " . " •.,"*, • " • ' =-- - HOW A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT WORKS The first diagram shows that a nuclear power plant is similar to a coal or gas burning steam power plant, except that a nuclear reaction provides the heat to generate the steam. Fig. 2 shows diagrammatically how this is done. When tubes containing nuclear fuel (see Fig. 11, page22) ate surrounded by heavy water, a nuclear reaction takes place which causes the fuel to become hot. A separate system pumps high pressure heavy water past the fuel, which heats the water to a temperature of about 575°F (the pressure prevents it from boiling). This water passes through the many small tubes of a heat exchanger, thence back to the reactor. Ordinary water surrounds the tubes of the heat exchanger, or steam generator, and boils to provide ordinary steam for the turbine. As in all modern steam power plants, after passing through the turbine the steam must be condensed before being pumped back into the steam generator. The con-, denser is normally cooled by water drawn from the nearest lake, river or ocean, and is returned-to the source some 15°F warmer. Fig. 1 — Nuclear power plants are much like conventional steam Fig. 3 shows a 540 MW turbo-generator at Ontario power plants, except that a nuclear reactor provides the heat to Hydro's Pickering Nuclear Generating Station. It generate the steam. generates more than'eight times the power of the famous ship "Queen Elizabeth". , . : MXMiAS POINT NUC11AR POWIR STATION Fig. 2 — Schematic flow diagram of a nuclear power plant. Fig. 4 - The Pickering Nuclear G.S. under conttruçtion. The first three units are now operating steadHy at full power. -Fig. 5-Th» Douglas Point Nuclear Generating . Station. ,•'••' ATOMIC ENERGY ESTAILISHMENTS IN CANADA «HITMHH1 NUCLIM ntUUICH KUUUISHMMT 1D0 ISO 30ft Fig. 6 — Location of .Canadian atomic energy research establishments and nuclear power plants. A bird's eye view of the Pickering station is shown a capacity of 200 MW, it commenced operation in in Fig. 4. Each of the four domed structures contains 1966.
Recommended publications
  • Flooding the Border: Development, Politics, and Environmental Controversy in the Canadian-U.S
    FLOODING THE BORDER: DEVELOPMENT, POLITICS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROVERSY IN THE CANADIAN-U.S. SKAGIT VALLEY by Philip Van Huizen A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in The Faculty of Graduate Studies (History) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) June 2013 © Philip Van Huizen, 2013 Abstract This dissertation is a case study of the 1926 to 1984 High Ross Dam Controversy, one of the longest cross-border disputes between Canada and the United States. The controversy can be divided into two parts. The first, which lasted until the early 1960s, revolved around Seattle’s attempts to build the High Ross Dam and flood nearly twenty kilometres into British Columbia’s Skagit River Valley. British Columbia favoured Seattle’s plan but competing priorities repeatedly delayed the province’s agreement. The city was forced to build a lower, 540-foot version of the Ross Dam instead, to the immense frustration of Seattle officials. British Columbia eventually agreed to let Seattle raise the Ross Dam by 122.5 feet in 1967. Following the agreement, however, activists from Vancouver and Seattle, joined later by the Upper Skagit, Sauk-Suiattle, and Swinomish Tribal Communities in Washington, organized a massive environmental protest against the plan, causing a second phase of controversy that lasted into the 1980s. Canadian and U.S. diplomats and politicians finally resolved the dispute with the 1984 Skagit River Treaty. British Columbia agreed to sell Seattle power produced in other areas of the province, which, ironically, required raising a different dam on the Pend d’Oreille River in exchange for not raising the Ross Dam.
    [Show full text]
  • Vancouver, B.C. May 11, 1976 Volume 50
    MACKENZIE VALLEY PIPELINE INQUIRY IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATIONS BY EACH OF (a) CANADIAN ARCTIC GAS PIPELINE LIMITED FOR A RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT MIGHT BE GRANTED ACROSS CROWN LANDS WITHIN THE YUKON TERRITORY AND THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, and (b) FOOTHILLS PIPE LINES LTD. FOR A RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT MIGHT BE GRANTED ACROSS CROWN LANDS WITHIN THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES FOR THE PURPOSE OF A PROPOSED MACKENZIE VALLEY PIPELINE and IN THE MATTER OF THE SOCIAL, ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC IMPACT REGIONALLY OF THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND SUBSEQUENT ABANDONMENT OF THE ABOVE PROPOSED PIPELINE (Before the Honourable Mr. Justice Berger, Commissioner) Vancouver, B.C. May 11, 1976 PROCEEDINGS AT COMMUNITY HEARING Volume 50 The 2003 electronic version prepared from the original transcripts by Allwest Reporting Ltd. Vancouver, B.C. V6B 3A7 Canada Ph: 604-683-4774 Fax: 604-683-9378 www.allwestbc.com APPEARANCES Mr. Ian G. Scott, Q.C. Mr. Ian Waddell, and Mr. Ian Roland for Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Inquiry Mr. Piere Genest, Q.C. and Mr. Darryl Carter, for Canadian Arctic Gas Pipeline Lim- ited; Mr. Alan Hollingworth and Mr. John W. Lutes for Foothills Pipe- lines Ltd.; Mr. Russell Anthony and pro. Alastair Lucas for Canadian Arctic Resources Committee Mr. Glen Bell, for Northwest Territo- ries Indian Brotherhood, and Metis Association of the Northwest Territories. INDEX Page WITNESSES: Gilbert COOK, Steve CARPENTER, Lonnie HINDLE 4853 Daniel O'BRIEN 4854 Peter B. HOLMES 4860 Bernard GILLIE and Mrs. Mavis GILLIE 4864 Douglas DOBYNS 4874 Rev. Jack SHAVER and Rev. Art ANDERSON 4880 Richard STACE-SMITH 4885 Philip PAUL 4897 John DALY 4904 John LITTLEDALE 4908 Douglas PIMLOTT 4911 Miss Celia KOVAL 4915 Harry BURROW, Joan ST.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Literature Related to Movements of Adult Salmon and Steelhead Past Dams and Through Reservoirs in the Lower Snake River
    i'i US Army Corps of Engineers Walla Walla District A Review of Literature Related to Movements of Adult Salmon and Steelhead Past Dams and Through Reservoirs in the Lower Snake River T.C. Bjornn and C.A. Peery U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit 19970403 014 October 1992 mm QUAIIST? rsagwEBD i Technical Report 92-1 A REVIEW OF LITERATURE RELATED TO MOVEMENTS OF ADULT SALMON AND STEELHEAD PAST DAMS AND THROUGH RESERVOIRS IN THE LOWER SNAKE RIVER T.C. Bjornn and C.A. Peery U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83843 for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Walla Walla District April 1992 Table of Contents Abstract Introduction 1 Study Area and Fish of Concern 1 Factors Influencing Migrations 5 Migration in Natural Rivers 7 Migration Past Dams ■) 5 Entry Into Fishways 16 Tailrace flow patterns 17 Powerhouse discharges 18 Power peaking 20 Spillway discharge patterns 21 Fishway entrances 24 Migration Through Fishways 25 Passage Through the Navigation Locks 30 Fallback At Dams 30 Migration In Reservoirs 38 Flows 42 Temperatures 44 Turbidity 44 Nitrogen Supersaturation 45 Other Factors 46 "Losses" During Migration 48 Discussion 5-) Literature Cited 55 Additional Related Literature 67 Abstract A synthesis of published and unpublished literature on the upstream migration of adult salmon and steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss, with particular reference to passage through reservoirs and over dams, was prepared as part of an evaluation of fish passage through the lower Snake River. Most of the information on adult migrations in the Snake and Columbia rivers was collected on chinook salmon O.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Steelhead Abundance
    Part III. Historic Steelhead Abundance Conclusion In the attempt to piece together a history of Hoh River steelhead, it has been necessary to examine the steelhead histories of neighboring river basins of the Olympic Peninsula – the Queets, Quileute, and Quinault – as well as Puget Sound and the Stillaguamish River, in order to collect enough data to develop a regional pattern that can help to fill in the many historic blanks. The history of the harvest of sea otters was also examined. Sea otters provide the example of an animal whose original North Pacific Rim range was nearly identical to that of steelhead, whose abundance was great, and whose near extinction was strictly that of overharvest with little compromise of habitat at the time. And lastly, the example of Alaska's Situk River is examined where a steelhead population was targeted for purposeful eradication, went into great depletion, and then through management changes has made considerable progress toward steelhead recovery. The combined comparisons of these steelhead histories found there was a general pattern of great steelhead depletion that has occurred with steady progression over the past 80 to 120 years since the advent of industrial level fish harvests whose motivation was strictly immediate profit as the culmination to a human cultural/economic shift that occurred on the West Coast of North America. In some cases wild steelhead populations were targeted for harvest by the varied economic interest groups, in others they were incidentally harvested, and in at least one case wild steelhead were a perceived threat to those economic interests and were targeted instead for eradication.
    [Show full text]
  • Matrix Analytic Methods with Markov Decision Processes for Hydrological Applications
    MATRIX ANALYTIC METHODS WITH MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES FOR HYDROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS Aiden James Fisher December 2014 Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Mathematical Sciences at The University of Adelaide ÕÎêË@ ø@ QK. Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge the help and support of various people for all the years I was working on this thesis. My supervisors David Green and Andrew Metcalfe for all the work they did mentoring me through out the process of researching, developing and writing this thesis. The countless hours they have spent reading my work and giving me valuable feedback, for supporting me to go to conferences, giving me paid work to support myself, and most importantly, agreeing to take me on as a PhD candidate in the first place. The School of Mathematical Sciences for giving me a scholarship and support for many years. I would especially like to thank all the office staff, Di, Jan, Stephanie, Angela, Cheryl, Christine, Renee, Aleksandra, Sarah, Rachael and Hannah, for all their help with organising offices, workspaces, computers, casual work, payments, the postgraduate workshop, conference travel, or just for having a coffee and a chat. You all do a great job and don't get the recognition you all deserve. All of my fellow postgraduates. In my time as a PhD student I would have shared offices with over 20 postgraduates, but my favourite will always be the \classic line" of G23: Rongmin Lu, Brian Webby, and Jessica Kasza. I would also like to give special thanks to Nick Crouch, Kelli Francis-Staite, Alexander Hanysz, Ross McNaughtan, Susana Soto Rojo, my brot´eg´eStephen Wade, and my guide to postgraduate life Jason Whyte, for being my friends all these years.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1976
    INTERNATIONAL PACIFIC SALMON F I S H E R I E S C o-M M I S S I O N APPOINTED UNDER A CONVENTION BETWEEN CANADA AND THE UNITED STATES FOR THE PROTECTION, PRESERVATION AND EXTENSION OF THE SOCKEYE AND PINK SALMON FISHERIES IN THE FRASER RIVER SYSTEM ANNUAL REPORT 1976 COMMISSIONERS DONALD R. JOHNSON W.R. HOURSTON WILLIAM G. SALETIC RICHARD NELSON DONALD W. MOOS RODERICK HAIG-BROWN NEW WESTMINSTER CANADA 1977 INTERNATIONAL PACIFIC SALMON FISHERIES COMMISSION MEMBERS AND PERIOD OF SERVICE SINCE THE INCEPTION OF THE COMMISSION IN 1937 CANADA UNITED STATES William A. Found ........................... 1937-1939 Edward W. Allen ............................ 1937-1951 1957-1957 A. L. Hager ..................................... 1937-1948 B. M. Brennan ................................ 1937-1942 Senator Thomas Reid .................... 1937-1967 Charles E. Jackson ........................ 1937-1946 A. J. Whitmore ............................... 1939-1966 1968-1969 Fred J. Foster ................................. 1943-1947 Olof Hanson ................................... 1948-1952 Milo Moore .................................... 1946-1949 1957-1961 H. R. MacMillan, C.B.E., D.Sc .... 1952-1956 Albert M. Day ................................. 1947-1954 F. D. Mathers ................................. 1956-1960 Alvin Anderson ............................... 1949-1950 W.R. Hourston .............................. 1960- Robert J. Schoettler ...................... 1951-1957 Richard Nelson .............................. 1966-1976 Elton B. Jones ...............................
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the 1972 Northeast Pacific Pink Salmon Workshop
    INFORMATIONAL LEAFLET NO. 161 PROCEED INGS OF THE 1972 NORTHEAST PAC IF IC PINK SAWON WORKSHOP Edited by: Jack E. Bailey Rapporteur - 1972 Pink Salmon Workshop National Marine Fisheries Service STATE OF ALASKA WILLIAM A. EGAN - GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME SUBPORT BUILDING, JUNEAU 99801 December 1972 PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1972 NORTHEAST PACIFIC PINK SALMON WORKSHOP The abstracts and talks reproduced in this report are not to be treated as published material and any reference to their contents should be approved by the author and cited as a personal communication. Edited by: Jack E . Bailey Rapporteur - 1972 Pink Salmon Workshop National Marine Fisheries Service P. 0. Box 155 Auke Bay, Alaska 99821 FOREWORD The Northeast Pacific Pink Salmon Workshops have been held biennially since 1962. The purpose of the workshops is to encourage exchange of ideas, criticisms , questions and suggestions . It is the intent that participants and respective agencies will receive maximum benefit from the meetings through the continuous correspondence long after the adjournment of the workshop. To this end, we have liberally reproduced all material made available by the panel speakers. In addition, we have added one discussion which we believe is of interest to you who attended the workshop. Panel topics were selected from a list of six suggested by the 1970 steering committee. For the first time since the inception of the workshops, two full panels were devoted to artificial propagation and multiple use of watersheds. That these topics are of major importance in the salmon industry is a matter of public record. Perhaps the 1974 steering committee will con- sider a full day devoted to environmental concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Effects of Dams on Migratory Fish in the Mekong River: Lessons from Salmon in the Fraser and Columbia Rivers
    Environmental Management (2011) 47:141–159 DOI 10.1007/s00267-010-9563-6 Potential Effects of Dams on Migratory Fish in the Mekong River: Lessons from Salmon in the Fraser and Columbia Rivers John W. Ferguson • Michael Healey • Patrick Dugan • Chris Barlow Received: 17 September 2009 / Accepted: 2 September 2010 / Published online: 6 October 2010 Ó Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA) 2010 Abstract We compared the effects of water resource mainstem dams. Minimizing impacts will require decades development on migratory fish in two North American to design specialized fish passage facilities, dam opera- rivers using a descriptive approach based on four high- tions, and artificial production, and is complicated by the level indicators: (1) trends in abundance of Pacific salmon, Mekong’s high diversity and productivity. Prompt action is (2) reliance on artificial production to maintain fisheries, needed by governments and fisheries managers to plan (3) proportion of adult salmon that are wild- versus Mekong water resource development wisely to prevent hatchery-origin, and (4) number of salmon populations impacts to the world’s most productive inland fisheries, and needing federal protection to avoid extinction. The two food security and employment opportunities for millions of rivers had similar biological and physical features but people in the region. radically different levels of water resource development: the Fraser River has few dams and all are located in trib- Keywords Dams Á Migratory fish Á Fish passage Á utaries, whereas the Columbia River has more than 130 Mitigation Á Fisheries large mainstem and tributary dams. Not surprisingly, we found substantial effects of development on salmon in the Columbia River.
    [Show full text]
  • Its, the Biological and Technical Justification for the Flow Proposal Of
    Its, Er .11,31 The Biological and Technical Justification for the Flow Proposal of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Prepared jointly by the members of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority 2501 S.W. First Ave., Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97201-4752 February, 1991 The Biological and Technical Justification for the Flow Proposal of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Prepared jointly by the members of the Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authoritv 2501 S.W. First Ave., Suite 200 Portland, Oregon 97201-4752 Februarv, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES LIST OF TABLES .................. V SUMMARY ............. .................................................. vi 1. BACKGROUND I A. Introduction 1 B. Historical Perspective 2 ..................................... ................. II. IDENTIFICATION OF THE NEED FOR FLOW 8 A- Juvenile Salmonids 8 1. Migratory Behavior 9 a. Biology ...................................................... 9 b. Control ............................................................ of Migratory Behavior 10 .......... .... .................... 2. Physiological Development @ ............................................... 12 a. Delay and Residualism 13 b. ............................................... Salinity Preference and Tolerance 15 c. "Windows" BioloQical ....................................... of Timeliness and Their Management Implications 16 ........... 3. Predation Losses and Flow 18 a. Time ............................................... Residence Effects on Predation Losses
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Climate Insurance for Pacific Northwest Salmon and Salmon Fisheries: Finding Our Way Through the Entangled Bank
    knudsen.qxp 5/27/2004 2:11 PM Page 121 American Fisheries Society Symposium 43:xx–xx, 2004 © 2004 by the American Fisheries Society Natural Climate Insurance for Pacific Northwest Salmon and Salmon Fisheries: Finding Our Way through the Entangled Bank NATHAN MANTUA1 University of Washington Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans/ School of Marine Affairs Climate Impacts Group, Box 354235 Seattle, Washington 98195-4235, USA ROBERT C. FRANCIS2 University of Washington, School of Aquatic and Fisheries Sciences, Box 355020, Seattle, Washington 8195-5020, USA Abstract.—This essay focuses on the linkages between climate (variability and change) and sustainable salmon management policies. We show the importance of climate in its effects on salmon production as well as how unpredictable these effects are. Our assessment leads us to conclude that the treatment of environmental uncertainty poses a fundamental conflict between the kind of policies that have been traditionally used in fishery management—basically command and control policies that assume predictability and assert engineering solutions to just one or a few aspects of highly complicated problems—and what the environmental variabil- ity dictates—policies that embrace environmental variability and uncertainty and acknowl- edge a lack of predictability for salmon ecosystems. In this regard, we conclude that three things need to happen in order to integrate climate information into sustainable salmon man- agement policies: 1. De-emphasize the role of preseason run-size predictions in management activities. 2. Emphasize preseason and in-season monitoring of both the resource and its environment. 3. Focus on strategies that minimize the importance of uncertain climate variability and change scenarios to increase the resilience of short and long-term planning decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Annualreport1971.Pdf
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OP RECREATION AND CONSERVATION HON, \V. K. K1J?.RNAN, h1inistcr Ll.OYD BROOKS, Aclit1$ t>cplil)' /.1itlisltr REPORT OF THE Department of Recreation and Conservation containing Jht rtp(Jrts of tire GENERAL ADMINISTRATION, FISH AND WILDLIFE BRANCH, PROVINCIAL PARKS BRANCH, BRITISH COLUMBIA PROVINCIAL MUSEUM, At"-'D COMMERCIAL FISHERIES BRANCH Year E11ded December 3/ 1971 Printed by K. ~1. ~iAC()ON.1.U>, Priri;cr to O>C Ql,:ecn'&bf<»t Ex«elknt ~taje.sty lA ri.&ht or the PrcwiNe of British Columbia. 1'72 \ VICTORIA, BRITISH COLUMBIA, JUN!! 30, 1972 To Colonel tire llonourable JOHN R. NICHOLSON, P.C., O.B.E., Q.C., LL.D., Lieutenam-Govemor of tire Province of British Columbia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR: Herewith I beg respectfully to submit the Annual Report of the Department of Recreation and Conservation for the year ended December 31, 1971. W. K. KIERNAN MiniSter of Recreation and Conservation VICTORIA, BRITISH COLllMllIA, JUNE 29, 1972 The Ho11011rable W. K. Kiema11, Mi11ister of Recreatio11 aml Conservation. Sm: I have the honour to submit the Annual Report of the Department of Recreation and Conservation for the year ended December 31, 1971. LLOYD BROOKS Acti11g Depwy Mi11ister of Recreation a11d Conservation CONTENTS ,_ Introduction by the Acting Deputy Minister of Recreation and Conservation General Administration 9 Fish and Wildlife Branch 15 Provincial Parks Branch 63 . -----------------·------ British Columbia Provincial Museum 97 Commercial Fisheries Branch 125 I ") I ! I l.I. I li.•l Report of the Department of Recreation and Conservation, 1971 LLOYD BROOKS, ACTll<O DBPUTY MINISTER ANO CoMMISSIONER OF FISHERlllS Th"TRODUCTIO ' The increased emphasis on 311 in1egxatcd approach 10 resources management throughout the Province, and the general concern over environmental quality by citizens, by industry, and by related resource agencies, Federal nod Provincial, bas added a new and demanding dimension to the work o( this Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Marine Fisheries Commission
    th 24 Annual Report of the PACIFIC MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR 1971 TO THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES AND TO THE GOVERNORS AND LEGISLATURES OF WASHINGTON, OREGON, CALIFORNIA, IDAHO, AND ALASKA th 24 Annual Report of the PACIFIC MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION FOR THE YEAR 1971 To the Congress of the United States and the Governors and Legislatures of the Five Compacting States, Washington, Oregon, California, Idaho and Alaska, by the Commis- sioners of the Pacific Marine Fisheries Commission in Compliance with the State Enabling Acts Creating the Commission and Public Laws 232; 766; and 315 of the 80th; 87th; and 91st Congresses of the United States Assenting Thereto. Respectfully submitted, PACIFIC MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION H. JACK ALVORD J. PAT METKE G. RAY ARNETT FRANK A. MOORE JOHN D. CALLAGHAN WALLACE H. NOERENBERG HAROLD P., CARY FRANK PERATROVICH JOSEPH I. EOFF TED G. PETERSON JOSEPH C. GREENLEY McKEE A. SMITH EDWARD G. HUFFSCHMIDT VINCENT THOMAS PAUL C. KEETON T. E. THOMPSON ALLAN L. KELLY % THOR C. TOLLEFSON HAROLD E. LOKKEN JAMES WHITTAKER * Headquarters Office: PACIFIC MARINE FISHERIES COMMISSION JOHN P. HARVILLE, Executive Director EVELYN KORN, Office Secretary 342 State Office Building 1400 S.W. Fifth Avenue Portland, Oregon 97201 LEON A. VERHOEVEN, Editor October 1972 Table of Contents Page Introduction __________________________________________________________ 3 International ___________________________ ^ _________________________ 3 National ________________________________________________ .... ____ 3 PMFC
    [Show full text]