Athabasca Oil Sands Downloaded from by Guest on 29 September 2021 L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Athabasca Oil Sands Downloaded from by Guest on 29 September 2021 L FIELD CASE HISTORY Athabasca Oil Sands Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/JPT/article-pdf/15/05/479/2214045/spe-517-pa.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 L. A. BELLOWS JUNIOR MEMBER AIME OIL & GAS CONSERVATION BOARD OF ALBERTA V. E. BOHME CALGARY, ALTA. MEMBER AIME Abstract The oil sand is primarily quartz with varying percent­ The location, oil reserves and general geology of ages of silt and clay. Maximum oil saturation is about Alberta's Athabasca oil sands are described with a short 18 per cent by weight in a clean sand but decreases with history of exploration, research and development to date. increasing silt and clay content. Sand with oil saturation Proposed methods of separating the oil from mined sands in excess of about 10 per cent is classed as a "good" grade include hot-water and cold-water separation, and centrif­ while sand containing less than about 5 per cent of oil is ugal and supersonic processes. In situ recovery methods not considered to be economically recoverable by present using combustion, injected fluids or nuclear explosions mining and processing techniques. have been investigated. A project for mining and hot­ . The oil found in the McMurray formation is heavy, water separation is scheduled to begin operation in 1966. VISCOUS and sulfurous. Specific gravity is from 1.002 to Another proposed mining project and an in situ recovery 1.027; viscosity, 3,000 to 400,000 poise at 60F. The sulfur operation are described briefly. The impact of oil-sands content is from 4 to 5 per cent, and the nitrogen content synthetic crude on Alberta's market is discussed. is about 0.4 per cent. The origin of the oil has been explained by a number of different theories but the gen- Introduction The Athabasca oil sands of the McMurray formation' in northeastern Alberta cover an area of about 21,000 sq miles and contain the world's largest reserve of eco­ nomically recoverable oil. Fort McMurray, a small town in the heart of the oil-sands area, is about 235 air miles northeast of Edmonton. A railway serves the town but no year-round roads connect with the rest of Alberta (Fig. 1). The McMurray formation is of early Cretaceous age, deposited unconformably on a limestone surface of Devonian age. The sediments appear to have originated from the Canadian Shield to the east and were deposited in bays and deltas of large fresh-water lakes. The lakes were later replaced by marine seas in which the overlying Clearwater shale was deposited (Fig. 2). The sand body rarely exceeds 200 ft in thickness and is made up of innumerable minor and major lenses of unconsolidated oil-bearing sand interspersed with clay and shale partings of variable thickness, carbonaceous and lignite beds, some rock and boulders. Overburden thins along a topographic trough which contains the Athabasca River and increases in thickness to about 2,000 ft along \ CALGARY the southern and western limits of the oil impregnation. '\ 0 SCALE-MILES Oil sand is exposed on the banks of the Athabasca River ..... 50 o 50 100 150 and its tributaries. 1 ! <I SUBSURfACE EXTENT Of OIL SANDS - _ _ . _ .. _ .._ ... _.~\_. OUTCROP Of OIL SANDS - _ Originai manuscript received in Soeiety of Petroleum Engineers offiee Jan. 14. 1963. Revised manuscript received March 26 1963 Paper -';;"$."4: _... __ .-L ____ ._ .. _... _.. __ _ presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of AIME Feb 24:28 1963 in Dallas, Tex. ' . , , "References given at end of paper. SPE 517 Fig. 1 MAY, 1963 479 small-scale plant to investigate the feasibility of mining the sand and separating the oil by means of a hot-water washing process. At about the same time two private inter­ ests (Abasand and Bitumont) started independent attempts to mine and separate oil sand at locations along the Athabasca River. An attempt was made to recover oil by in situ combustion and steam injection with varying degrees of success, but none of the operations was con­ sidered satisfactory for immediate commercial application. Until the start of World War II all the projects were to obtain road-paving materials-either oil sand in its natural state or separated oil for use in asphalt plants. Fig. 2-Generalized cross-section of the Athabasca oil-sands During the war the Canadian Government became inter­ area (vertical scale exaggerated). ested in the sands as a source of petroleum for gasoline. The Federal Government took over operation of one of erally accepted hypothesis is that the oil migrated from the Abasand plants which was mining some sand and the Devonian limestones. separating oil by a hot-water extraction process. The plant was rebuilt to use a cold-water process but was destroyed Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/JPT/article-pdf/15/05/479/2214045/spe-517-pa.pdf by guest on 29 September 2021 by fire in 1945 before it started operation. Reserves In 1944 the Government of Alberta invested $500,000 The amount of oil in place in the sands is estimated' in the Bitumont enterprise to promote utilization of the to be well over 300 billion bbl, with none appearing to be sands. In 1948 K. A. Clark of the Research Council of recoverable by natural flow. A well which had been drilled Alberta was named to direct the project. A plant was into the oil sands and left open since 1900 was re-entered constructed and operated successfully in 1949, again using in 1957, when about 30 ft of tar-like oil was found to the hot-water extraction method.' have accumulated in the hole. In situ recovery using heat Discovery of major conventional crude oil reserves in in some form or open-pit mining seems to be the most Alberta caused a decrease of interest in oil-sand oil; logical recovery method. however, in 1951 the Government of Alberta sponsored A principal criterion in determining economical recovery an Athabasca Oil Sands Conference. Papers summarizing by mining methods is the ratio of oil sand to overburden. all the oil-sand knowledge" were presented, including Submissions made to the Conservation Board have indi­ papers on the theory of mining by block caving and in cated that a ratio of about 2: 1 or 1: 1 will permit mining situ electrovolatilization. Neither of these theories Was methods to be used for recovery. At an oil sand to over­ considered economic. burden ratio of 2: 1, about 1 \/2 billion bbl of oil is avail­ In 1958 Richfield Oil Corp. proposed the use of a small able; and a ratio of 1: 1 provides an additional 3Yz billion nuclear underground explosion as a source of heat for bbl of oil. These reserve figures are for minable sands recovery of oil from the sand. A special committee studied containing more than 10 per cent oil by weight and would the proposal and in a report submitted in 1959' recom­ be considerably higher if lower quality sands were in­ mended to the Provincial Government that the test be cluded. carried out. However, the international moratorium on By pr:;sen~ly prJPosed mining methods the over-all atomic testing and subsequent Canadian Government poli­ rfcovery of n11rke~able oil is cs:ima:ed to tc about 50 to cies have prevented the experiment. 6J per oent of the oil in place-using 5 per cent oil by weight as a cut-off for the reserve estimates. The only Ownership and Government Legislation in situ recovery estimate available is the 50 to 70 per cent An important section of the history of the oil sands is quoted by Shell for their in situ projecC; and when above­ the historical background of ownership and government ground losses and fuel requirements are included, the legislation concerning the sands. over-all recovery will be in the range of 30 to 45 per cent. In Oct., 1930 all natural resources owned by the Federal Since the major portion of the oil in the sands will likely Government were turned over to the provincial govern­ be recovered by in situ methods, the best current estimate ments. Alberta gained title to virtually all of the oil sands for over-all recovery from this reserve would be in the except for a few parcels reserved by the Federal Govern­ 30 to 45 per cent range. Using a 35 per cent recovery ment and small areas of freehold ownership. The present factor, the oil-in-place estimates will exceed 100 billion policy of the Alberta Government is to retain title to the bbl of marketable oil reserves. sands but to permit exploitation either by issuing prospect­ ing permits which allow exploration of the sands or by History (From Ref. 4) granting 21-year leases permitting the recovery of com­ mercial oil from the sands. An area of about 7,000 sq In 1778 Peter Pond, an explorer of the Canadian north­ miles-covering most of the oil-sands area-was made west, first noted the occurrence of the Athabasca River available for prospecting permits or leases. About 80 oil-sands outcrops in his journals. Surface geological sur­ leases and three permits are currently in force, covering veys were carried out during the 1800's. Some drilling was 2Yz million acres. The royalty payable to the government begun in the early 1900's in search of a "bitumen pool" in the early leases was set at 10 per cent of the value of believed to exist beneath or down dip from the oil sands. the products taken from the sands. Sand was quarried during this period in the vicinity of In 1955 the government enacted legislation exempting McMurray and used in its natural form for road paving.
Recommended publications
  • Athabasca Oil Sands Project Acquisition March 9, 2017
    Athabasca Oil Sands Project Acquisition March 9, 2017 ATHABASCA OIL SANDS PROJECT ACQUISITION March 9, 2017 PREMIUM VALUE. DEFINED GROWTH. INDEPENDENT. Agenda • Transaction ‒Significant Opportunity ‒Overview & Metrics ‒Operational Impact • Asset Overview ‒Summary & Upside Opportunities ‒Mines ‒Upgrader ‒Infrastructure Pipelines ‒Quest Carbon, Capture, & Storage (“CCS”) ‒Other Oil Sands Assets • Opportunities to Create Value • Finance ‒Summary of Financial Impact ‒Financing Plan • Conclusion CNQ 2 1 Athabasca Oil Sands Project Acquisition March 9, 2017 Forward Looking Statements Certain statements relating to Canadian Natural Resources Limited (the “Company”) in this document or documents incorporated herein by reference constitute forward-looking statements or information (collectively referred to herein as “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of applicable securities legislation. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the words “believe”, “anticipate”, “expect”, “plan”, “estimate”, “target”, “continue”, “could”, “intend”, “may”, “potential”, “predict”, “should”, “will”, “objective”, “project”, “forecast”, “goal”, “guidance”, “outlook”, “effort”, “seeks”, “schedule”, “proposed” or expressions of a similar nature suggesting future outcome or statements regarding an outlook. Disclosure related to expected future commodity pricing, forecast or anticipated production volumes, royalties, operating costs, capital expenditures, income tax expenses and other guidance provided, constitute forward-looking statements. Disclosure
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Borehole Placement of Radioactive Wastes a Feasibility Study
    DEEP BOREHOLE PLACEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES A FEASIBILITY STUDY Bernt S. Aadnøy & Maurice B. Dusseault Executive Summary Deep Borehole Placement (DBP) of modest amounts of high-level radioactive wastes from a research reactor is a viable option for Norway. The proposed approach is an array of large- diameter (600-750 mm) boreholes drilled at a slight inclination, 10° from vertical and outward from a central surface working site, to space 400-600 mm diameter waste canisters far apart to avoid any interactions such as significant thermal impacts on the rock mass. We believe a depth of 1 km, with waste canisters limited to the bottom 200-300 m, will provide adequate security and isolation indefinitely, provided the site is fully qualified and meets a set of geological and social criteria that will be more clearly defined during planning. The DBP design is flexible and modular: holes can be deeper, more or less widely spaced, at lesser inclinations, and so on. This modularity and flexibility allow the principles of Adaptive Management to be used throughout the site selection, development, and isolation process to achieve the desired goals. A DBP repository will be in a highly competent, low-porosity and low-permeability rock mass such as a granitoid body (crystalline rock), a dense non-reactive shale (chloritic or illitic), or a tight sandstone. The rock matrix should be close to impermeable, and the natural fractures and bedding planes tight and widely spaced. For boreholes, we recommend avoiding any substance of questionable long-term geochemical stability; hence, we recommend that surface casings (to 200 m) be reinforced polymer rather than steel, and that the casing is sustained in the rock mass with an agent other than standard cement.
    [Show full text]
  • Petroleum Engineering (PETE) | 1
    Petroleum Engineering (PETE) | 1 PETE 3307 Reservoir Engineering I PETROLEUM ENGINEERING Fundamental properties of reservoir formations and fluids including reservoir volumetric, reservoir statics and dynamics. Analysis of Darcy's (PETE) law and the mechanics of single and multiphase fluid flow through reservoir rock, capillary phenomena, material balance, and reservoir drive PETE 3101 Drilling Engineering I Lab mechanisms. Preparation, testing and control of rotary drilling fluid systems. API Prerequisites: PETE 3310 and PETE 3311 recommended diagnostic testing of drilling fluids for measuring the PETE 3310 Res Rock & Fluid Properties physical properties of drilling fluids, cements and additives. A laboratory Introduction to basic reservoir rock and fluid properties and the study of the functions and applications of drilling and well completion interaction between rocks and fluids in a reservoir. The course is divided fluids. Learning the rig floor simulator for drilling operations that virtually into three sections: rock properties, rock and fluid properties (interaction resembles the drilling and well control exercises. between rock and fluids), and fluid properties. The rock properties Corequisites: PETE 3301 introduce the concepts of, Lithology of Reservoirs, Porosity and PETE 3110 Res Rock & Fluid Propert Lab Permeability of Rocks, Darcy's Law, and Distribution of Rock Properties. Experimental study of oil reservoir rocks and fluids and their interrelation While the Rock and Fluid Properties Section covers the concepts of, applied
    [Show full text]
  • Bore Hole Ebook, Epub
    BORE HOLE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Joe Mellen,Mike Jay | 192 pages | 25 Nov 2015 | Strange Attractor Press | 9781907222399 | English | Devizes, United Kingdom Bore Hole PDF Book Drillers may sink a borehole using a drilling rig or a hand-operated rig. Search Reset. Another unexpected discovery was a large quantity of hydrogen gas. Accessed 21 Oct. A borehole may be constructed for many different purposes, including the extraction of water , other liquids such as petroleum or gases such as natural gas , as part of a geotechnical investigation , environmental site assessment , mineral exploration , temperature measurement, as a pilot hole for installing piers or underground utilities, for geothermal installations, or for underground storage of unwanted substances, e. Forces Effective stress Pore water pressure Lateral earth pressure Overburden pressure Preconsolidation pressure. Cancel Report. Closed Admin asked 1 year ago. Help Learn to edit Community portal Recent changes Upload file. Is Singular 'They' a Better Choice? Keep scrolling for more. Or something like that. We're gonna stop you right there Literally How to use a word that literally drives some pe Diameter mm Diameter mm Diameter in millimeters mm of the equipment. Drilling for boreholes was time-consuming and long. Whereas 'coronary' is no so much Put It in the 'Frunk' You can never have too much storage. We truly appreciate your support. Fiberscope 0 out of 5. Are we missing a good definition for bore-hole? Gold 0 out of 5. Share your knowledge. We keep your identity private, so you alone decide when to contact each vendor. Oil and natural gas wells are completed in a similar, albeit usually more complex, manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Variation in Oil Sands Pipeline Projects
    Canadian Journal of Political Science (2020), 1–20 doi:10.1017/S0008423920000190 RESEARCH ARTICLE/ÉTUDE ORIGINALE Explaining Variation in Oil Sands Pipeline Projects Amy Janzwood* Department of Political Science, University of Toronto, 100 St. George, Toronto ON, M5S 3G3 *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]. Abstract While the vast majority of oil pipeline projects in Canada have been successfully built, several mega oil sands projects within and passing through Canada have been cancelled or significantly delayed. This article explains why these delays and cancellations have occurred. A systematic cross-case analysis is used to provide insight into the changing politics of oil sands pipelines. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) is used to identify combinations of causal conditions that co-occur across cases of proposed new oil pipelines and pipeline expansion projects. The pipeline projects were proposed to the federal regulator—the National Energy Board—between 2006 and 2014. The QCA reveals that social mobilization and major regulatory barrier(s) are necessary conditions in explaining variation in pipeline project outcomes. The analysis of sufficiency reveals more complex configurations of conditions. This article contributes to the literature on the politics of oil sands pipelines by using a comparative approach to identify the impacts of socio-polit- ical and legal dynamics that have emerged around pipelines in the last 15 years. Résumé Cet article explique les raisons pour lesquelles plusieurs propositions récentes de méga- pipelines à l’intérieur du Canada et passant à travers le pays ont été annulées ou considérablement retardées. Alors que la grande majorité des projets d’oléoducs ont été construits avec succès, plusieurs mégaprojets de sables bitumineux ont été mis de côté ou ont subi des retards importants.
    [Show full text]
  • Facts About Alberta's Oil Sands and Its Industry
    Facts about Alberta’s oil sands and its industry CONTENTS Oil Sands Discovery Centre Facts 1 Oil Sands Overview 3 Alberta’s Vast Resource The biggest known oil reserve in the world! 5 Geology Why does Alberta have oil sands? 7 Oil Sands 8 The Basics of Bitumen 10 Oil Sands Pioneers 12 Mighty Mining Machines 15 Cyrus the Bucketwheel Excavator 1303 20 Surface Mining Extraction 22 Upgrading 25 Pipelines 29 Environmental Protection 32 In situ Technology 36 Glossary 40 Oil Sands Projects in the Athabasca Oil Sands 44 Oil Sands Resources 48 OIL SANDS DISCOVERY CENTRE www.oilsandsdiscovery.com OIL SANDS DISCOVERY CENTRE FACTS Official Name Oil Sands Discovery Centre Vision Sharing the Oil Sands Experience Architects Wayne H. Wright Architects Ltd. Owner Government of Alberta Minister The Honourable Lindsay Blackett Minister of Culture and Community Spirit Location 7 hectares, at the corner of MacKenzie Boulevard and Highway 63 in Fort McMurray, Alberta Building Size Approximately 27,000 square feet, or 2,300 square metres Estimated Cost 9 million dollars Construction December 1983 – December 1984 Opening Date September 6, 1985 Updated Exhibit Gallery opened in September 2002 Facilities Dr. Karl A. Clark Exhibit Hall, administrative area, children’s activity/education centre, Robert Fitzsimmons Theatre, mini theatre, gift shop, meeting rooms, reference room, public washrooms, outdoor J. Howard Pew Industrial Equipment Garden, and Cyrus Bucketwheel Exhibit. Staffing Supervisor, Head of Marketing and Programs, Senior Interpreter, two full-time Interpreters, administrative support, receptionists/ cashiers, seasonal interpreters, and volunteers. Associated Projects Bitumount Historic Site Programs Oil Extraction demonstrations, Quest for Energy movie, Paydirt film, Historic Abasand Walking Tour (summer), special events, self-guided tours of the Exhibit Hall.
    [Show full text]
  • DRILLING and TESTING GEOTHERMAL WELLS a Presentation for the World Bank July 2012 Geothermal Training Event  Geothermal Resource Group, Inc
    DRILLING AND TESTING GEOTHERMAL WELLS A Presentation for The World Bank July 2012 Geothermal Training Event Geothermal Resource Group, Inc. was founded in 1992 to provide drilling engineering and supervision services to geothermal energy operators worldwide. Since it’s inception, GRG has grown to include a variety of upstream geothermal services, from exploration management to resource assessment, and from drilling project management to reservoir engineering. GRG’s permanent and contract supervisory staff is among the most active consulting firms, providing services to nearly every major geothermal operation worldwide. Services and Expertise: Drilling Engineering Drilling Supervision Exploration Geosciences Reservoir Engineering Resource Assessment Project Management Upstream Production Engineering Training Worldwide Experience: United States, Canada, and Mexico Latin America – Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Chile Southeast Asia – Philippines and Indonesia New Zealand Kenya Tu r key Caribbean EXPLORATION PROCESS The exploration process is the initial phase of the project, where the resource is identified, qualified, and delineated. It is the longest phase of the project, taking years or even decades, and it is invariably the most poorly funded. EXPLORATION PROCESS Begins with identification of a potential resource Visible System – identified by surface manifestations, either active or inactive Blind System – identified by the structural setting, geophysical explorations, or by other indicators such as water and mining exploration drilling. EXPLORATION PROCESS Primary personnel Geoscientists Geologists – structural mapping, field reconnaissance, conceptual geological models Geochemists – geothermometry, water & gas chemistry Geophysicists – geophysical exploration, structural modeling Engineers Drilling Engineers – well design, rock mechanics, economic oversight Reservoir Engineers – reservoir modeling, well testing, economic evaluation, power phase determination EXPLORATION METHODS Pre-exploration research.
    [Show full text]
  • Model Petroleum Engineering Curriculum
    The SPE Model Petroleum Engineering Curriculum – What it is and what it isn’t The model petroleum engineering curriculum is intended as an aid to universities worldwide that want to start new petroleum engineering programs. It is not intended to be a “standard” curriculum, in that no petroleum engineering curriculum would have all of the course listed here. Any petroleum engineering curriculum should educate students in fundamental mathematics and science, humanities and liberal arts, engineering science, and the foundational course in petroleum engineering. Most curricula will include some more specialized petroleum engineering courses, like those listed in the model curriculum as petroleum engineering electives. No Bachelor’s of Science level degree program could include all of the courses shown in the elective list. The SPE model curriculum includes all of the educational areas needed to create a specific petroleum engineering curriculum. Every petroleum engineering curriculum in the world is unique, none are exactly the same. Many countries or regions have course requirements that do not appear anywhere else in the world. In the United States, there are significant variations in curricula, with some programs having emphases on particular areas of petroleum engineering that are different from other programs. This model curriculum can be used to construct a unique degree program for new programs, with the particular courses included based on the particular needs of that university, or that country. Model Petroleum Engineering Curriculum
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Sands Performance Report 2015
    OIL SANDS PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015 Shell Canada Ltd. April 22, 2016 OIL SANDS PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015 OIL SANDS PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015 INTRODUCTION This is Shell Canada’s seventh consecutive report on performance in our oil sands operations. We publish this update annually to share detail on our efforts and progress in developing Alberta’s oil sands in an economically, socially and environmentally responsible way. This report is intended for those who have interest in our performance and a desire to better understand oil sands development and its significant importance to Shell and to Canada. Further information about our oil sands operations is available at www.shell.ca/oilsands ABOUT THE DATA The data presented here covers the areas of safety, environment, reclamation and community and provides information on Shell’s operating performance for 2015 for: ■ Muskeg River and Jackpine Mines; ■ Scotford Upgrader; ■ Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Facility; and ■ Peace River and Cliffdale In Situ operations Unless otherwise noted, all data presented for the Muskeg River Mine, Jackpine Mine, Scotford Upgrader and Quest Facility is in reference to total Athabasca Oil Sands Project (AOSP) performance before division amongst joint venture owners. The AOSP is a joint venture operated by Shell, and owned among Shell Canada Energy (60%), Chevron Canada Limited (20%), and Marathon Oil Canada Corporation (20%). Data presented for In Situ operations is 100% Shell share. All monetary amounts referred to in the data are in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted. SHELL CANADA LTD. | 2 OIL SANDS PERFORMANCE REPORT 2015 SAFETY Safety is a core value we work hard to instill in our people — both employees and contractors.
    [Show full text]
  • Drilling Engineering Laboratory Manual
    KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM & MINERALS Department of Petroleum Engineering PETE 203: DRILLING ENGINEERING LABORATORY MANUAL APRIL 2003 PREFACE The purpose of this manual is two fold: first to acquaint the Drilling Engineering students with the basic techniques of formulating, testing and analyzing the properties of drilling fluid and oil well cement, and second, to familiarize him with practical drilling and well control operations by means of a simulator. To achieve this objective, the manual is divided into two parts. The first part consists of seven experiments for measuring the physical properties of drilling fluid such as mud weight (density), rheology (viscosity, gel strength, yield point) sand content, wall building and filtration characteristics. There are also experiment for studying the effects of, and treatment techniques for, common contaminants on drilling fluid characteristics. Additionally, there are experiments for studying physical properties of Portland cement such as free water separation, normal and minimum water content and thickening time. In the second part, there are five laboratory sessions that involve simulated drilling and well control exercises. They involve the use of the DS-100 Derrick Floor Simulator, a full replica of an actual drilling rig with fully operations controls, which allow the student to become completely absorbed in the exercises as he would in an actual drilling operation. The simulator has realistic drilling rig responses that are synchronized to specific events, like rate of penetration, rotary table motion, and actual rig sounds such as accumulator recharge, break drawworks, etc. It is hoped that the material in this manual will effectively supplement the theory aspect presented in the main course.
    [Show full text]
  • Schlumberger N.V. Annual Report 2018
    Schlumberger N.V. Annual Report 2018 Form 10-K (NYSE:SLB) Published: January 24th, 2018 PDF generated by stocklight.com UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form 10-K (Mark One) ☑ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 OR ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________ to __________ Commission File Number 1-4601 Schlumberger N.V. (Schlumberger Limited) (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Curaçao 52-0684746 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.) 42, rue Saint-Dominique Paris, France 75007 5599 San Felipe, 17th Floor Houston, Texas, United States of America 77056 62 Buckingham Gate, London, United Kingdom SW1E 6AJ Parkstraat 83, The Hague, The Netherlands 2514 JG (Addresses of principal executive offices) (Zip Codes) Registrant’s telephone number in the United States, including area code, is: (713) 513-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share New York Stock Exchange Euronext Paris The London Stock Exchange SIX Swiss Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES ☑ NO ☐ Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Natural Gas and Oil Emissions
    CANADA’S NATURAL GAS AND OIL EMISSIONS: Ongoing Reductions, Demonstrable Improvement GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND CANADA’S NATURAL GAS AND OIL INDUSTRY Canada’s Natural Gas and Oil Emissions: Ongoing Reductions, Demonstrable Improvement Contents Emissions: Ongoing Reductions, Demonstrable Improvement . E3 Industry Overview . E5 Technology Overview: The Path to Emissions Reduction . E7 Technology Performance to Date . E9 Near-Term / Potential Technologies . E22 Ongoing Collaboration and Research . E26 Emissions Intensity Performance Data . E29 Natural Gas, Natural Gas Liquids and Condensate . E30 Oil Sands In Situ . E31 Oil Sands Mining. E32 Offshore . E33 Comparable Emissions Performance and Data Quality . E34 E METHODOLOGY IN SITU OIL MINED OIL NATURAL GAS OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH 2 Emissions: Ongoing Reductions, Demonstrable Improvement E METHODOLOGY IN SITU OIL MINED OIL NATURAL GAS OFFSHORE TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH 3 il and natural gas will continue to be an important part of the world’s energy mix for the foreseeable future . Supplying affordable, reliable and cleaner energy to a Supplying affordable, Ogrowing global population will continue to be the goal of Canada’s upstream energy industry . reliable and cleaner Climate change is a global challenge that requires global energy to a growing perspectives and solutions . Advancing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction is critical to realizing the vision for Canada global population will to be a global natural gas and oil supplier of choice . continue to be the goal Emissions reduction performance, including emission intensity, is increasingly the basis for policies such as low-carbon of Canada’s upstream fuel regulations, carbon pricing, specific reduction targets energy industry. and emission caps . It’s used to inform funding decisions by governments, funding agencies and investors .
    [Show full text]