131218 - OGS.Atti.32 Vol.3.27.Indd 175 04/11/13 10.39 GNGTS 2013 Sessione 3.3

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

131218 - OGS.Atti.32 Vol.3.27.Indd 175 04/11/13 10.39 GNGTS 2013 Sessione 3.3 GNGTS 2013 SES S IONE 3.3 MaRINE GEOLOGICAL MappING OF THE CaMpaNIA REGION at THE 1:10,000 SCALE: THE EXAMPLE OF THE GEOLOGICAL Map N. 465 “ISOLA DI PROCIDA” (NapLES BaY, SOUTHERN TYRRHENIAN SEA, ItaLY) G.Aiello Institute of Marine Environmental and Coastal Area (IAMC), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Naples, Italy Introduction. Marine geological mapping of the Campania Region at the 1:10.000 scale is herein presented, focussing, in particular, on the geological map n. 465 “Isola di Procida” (Ispra, 2011). The geological map n. 465 “Isola di Procida” covers the Naples Bay from the Sorrento Peninsula up to the Procida island. In this geological map a total amount of 622 km2 of surface about 10 km2 are represented by emerged areas and 612 km2 by marine areas. The bathymetric belt 0/200 extends for 378 km2 and represents about the 60.8% of the total surface of the map. Sidescan sonar data have been calibrated by numerous sea bottom samples. The geological structures overlying the outcrop of acoustic basement, both carbonate (in correspondence to the Sorrento Peninsula) and volcanic (in correspondence to the Phlegrean Fields) have been investigated using Subbottom Chirp, Sparker and Watergun profiles. The interpretation of seismic data lends support for the reconstruction of the stratigraphic and structural setting of Quaternary continental shelf and slope successions and correlation to outcrops of acoustic basement, Mesozoic carbonate in the Sorrento Peninsula structural high and Quaternary volcanic in the Phlegrean Fields and Procida island. These areas result from the seaward prolongation of the stratigraphic and structural units widely cropping out in the surrounding emerged sector of the Sorrento Peninsula (Cinque et al., 1997), Naples town, Phlegrean Fields and Procida island (Scarpati et al., 1993; Perrotta et al., 2010; Ispra, 2011). Source data and methods of cartographic representation. Several geological and geophysical surveys on the continental shelf and slope of the Naples Bay have been carried out, particularly referring on the geological map n. 465 “Isola di Procida”. In particular, a high resolution Multibeam bathymetry of the Naples Bay allowed for the construction of a marine DEM (Digital Elevation Model) of the area, giving a detailed image of the morpho-structures at the sea bottom (D’Argenio et al., 2004). Moreover, Sidescan Sonar acoustic profiles covering the whole Naples Bay have been acquired for the construction of photomosaics of the sea bottom. The Sidescan Sonar photomosaics and the Multibeam bathymetry represented the base for the marine geological mapping. The integrated geological interpretation of seismic, bathymetric and Sidescan Sonar data has been tied by sea bottom samples and piston cores. The geological structures and the seismic sequences, both volcanic and sedimentary in nature, which characterize the Naples Bay at a regional scale have been the object of detailed studies carried out using multichannel and single channel seismics of various resolution and penetration, including the Sub-bottom Chirp profiles, often integrated with marine magnetics (Aiello et al., 2001; Secomandi et al., 2003; Aiello et al., 2004, 2005; D’Argenio et al., 2004; Ruggieri et al., 2007). The interpretation of high resolution seismic reflection profiles (Sub-bottom Chirp, Sparker and Watergun) has supported the reconstruction of stratigraphic and structural framework of the continental shelf and slope successions. The seismo-stratigraphic analysis allowed distinguishing the main volcanic and sedimentary seismic units, separated by regional unconformities, tectonically and eustatically controlled. The Dohrn and Magnaghi canyons, eroding the slope up to 1000 m of water depth, represent in the Naples Bay important morpho- structural lineaments, at the boundary between the sedimentary units of the eastern shelf of the Naples Bay and the volcanic units of the western shelf, in correspondence to the Ischia and Procida islands. The complex stratigraphic architecture of the Naples Bay has revealed, during the Late Quaternary, a strong control of the volcano-tectonic processes in triggering submarine gravity instabilities. This regional geological framework did not allow a simple application of principles 175 131218 - OGS.Atti.32_vol.3.27.indd 175 04/11/13 10.39 GNGTS 2013 SEssIONE 3.3 and techniques of seismic and sequence stratigraphy, as described in the guidelines for the redaction of marine geologic cartography (Catalano et al., 1996; Fabbri et al., 2002). Laterally coeval depositional systems, representing portions of system tracts of Late Quaternary depositional sequence have been recognized and their possible mapping has been taken into account for the cartographic representation. The seismic units have been later interpreted in terms of depositional sequences and corresponding unconformities have been interpreted as Type 1 or Type 2 sequence boundaries and/or as local unconformities, mainly at the top of relic volcanic edifices or at the top of volcanic seismic units (D’Argenio et al., 2004; Aiello et al., 2005; Ruggieri et al., 2007). The marine geological maps, realized based on the above mentioned criteria shows the distribution of several lithostratigraphic units cropping out at the sea bottom and of the main morphological lineaments, based on the CARG guidelines for the realization of marine cartography (Catalano et al., 1996; Fabbri et al., 2002). The main stratigraphic units individuated through the analysis of sea bottom sediments belong to the Late Quaternary Depositional Sequence; in this sequence, it is possible to recognize the space and time evolution and the lateral and vertical migration of marine coastal, continental shelf and slope depositional environments in the Late Pleistocene-Holocene glacio- eustatic cycle. The stratigraphic succession studied by geological survey has recorded the variations of the accommodation space of the Late Quaternary deposits during the last 4th order glacio-eustatic cycle, ranging between 128 ky B.P. (Tyrrhenian stage) and the present (isotopic stage 5e). One aim of the cartography has been the cartographic representation of the lithofacies associations, whose grouping form the depositional elements (which are portions of system tracts), in relation to the morpho-structural lineaments recognized through the geological interpretation of the geophysical data and the dynamics of depositional environments. In this way, we tried to realize an integration between classical stratigraphic approach, sequence stratigraphic approach and characterization of actual and recent depositional elements. The volcanic activity, which has mainly controlled the stratigraphic architecture of the Naples Bay prevented a classical stratigraphic approach in the marine geological mapping, which has been realized taking into account both the associations of depositional systems and the interstratified volcanic bodies (volcanites and volcanoclastites). Moreover, this stratigraphic approach allowed obtaining information comparable with other sectors of the Italian continental margins. The last Quaternary sea level rise, having an excursion of about 120 m and a maximum rate in the order of 10 m/1000 years has left a stratigraphic signature on the morphologic and stratigraphic framework of most continental margins of the world (Chappell and Shackleton, 1986). The deposits associated to this process are strongly different in the various areas, as a function of different sediment supply, morphological framework and oceanographic regimes; to map these deposits allows to correlate the unconformities (erosional and non-depositional) and to compare the facies, the internal geometries and the thickness of the deposits recording the sea level rise in a differential way on the several margins. The key to the geological maps. The key to the geological map n. 465 “Procida” includes the description of the geologic and morphologic elements. The areal geological elements are represented by two superimposed levels: the textural classes distinguished following the classification of Folk (1954), graphically distinguished with halftone screens; the depositional elements, distinguished with the full colour. The superimposition of the environmental information on the textural one allows for a more complete reading of the cartography, furnishing at the same time geological and environmental information. The morphological elements, both areal and linear represent another level of graphic superimposition to the geological information. 176 131218 - OGS.Atti.32_vol.3.27.indd 176 04/11/13 10.39 GNGTS 2013 SES S IONE 3.3 Marine geological units. Several volcanic units of substrate have been distinguished, cropping out between the Procida islands, the promontories of Monte di Procida and Capo Miseno and the coastal cliffs off Nisida and Posillipo (Naples town), of a carbonate unit of substrate, cropping out in the Sorrento Peninsula off Massalubrense and of undifferentiated carbonate and volcanic substrates, distinguished in the offshore area based on geophysics. The Late Quaternary marine geological units are herein described as it follows (Ispra, 2011). The littoral environment is characterized by different types of deposits, which characterize the high relief coasts and the low relief coasts. The toe of cliff deposits, representative of high relief coasts, represent the terms of passage among the sediments of the volcanic units representing the submerged cliffs and the sands and gravels of inner shelf,
Recommended publications
  • TABELLA CONFERIMENTI DEL 18 NON CERTIFICATA.Pdf
    TABELLA GIORNALIERA CONFERIMENTI DEL 18/08/2020 STIR GIUGLIANO STIR TUFINO FUORI PROVINCIA COMUNE CONFERITO COMUNE CONFERITO COMUNE CONFERITO COMUNE CONFERITO COMUNE CONFERITO COMUNE CONFERITO AFRAGOLA AGEROLA PALMA CAMPANIA 9,98 VICO EQUENSE Apice ARZANO 16,88 ANACAPRI 10,14 PIANO DI SORRENTO 11,5 VISCIANO Benevento 25,72 BARANO D'ISCHIA 12,9 BOSCOREALE 33,68 PIMONTE 12,1 VOLLA 33,8 Bucciano BACOLI BOSCOTRECASE 28,22 POGGIOMARINO 41,24 CONS.CIMIT.OTT.S.G. Campoli Taburno CARDITO BRUSCIANO POLLENA TROCCHIA foiano di val fortore CASALNUOVO 40,94 CAMPOSANO 8,22 POMIGLIANO D'ARCO 5,04 Foglianise CASANDRINO 15,66 CAPRI 29,12 POMPEI 39,56 Forchia CASAVATORE 18,08 CARBONARA DI NOLA ROCCARAINOLA Moiano 4,38 CASORIA CASAMARCIANO 4,72 SAN GIORGIO A.C. 8,76 Pago Veiano CRISPANO CASOLA 0,5 SAN GENNARO V. 21,56 Paupisi CALVIZZANO 12,88 CASTELLAMMARE 21,18 SAN GIUSEPPE V. 31,64 Paolisi CASAMICCIOLA 11,56 CASTELLO DI CISTERNA SAN PAOLO BEL SITO 6,82 San Lorenzello FORIO D'ISCHIA 59,16 CERCOLA SAN SEBASTIANO V. Sant'Angelo a Cupolo 6,16 FRATTAMAGGIORE 5,9 CICCIANO SAN VITALIANO San Leucio del Sannio FRATTAMINORE 22,24 CIMITILE SANT'AGNELLO Tocco Caudio 3,02 GRUMO NEVANO 14,74 COMIZIANO 3,82 SANT'ANASTASIA 58,64 33,8 39,28 GIUGLIANO 249,62 ERCOLANO 30,7 SANT'ANTONIO A. 14,48 ISCHIA 20,52 GRAGNANO SANTA MARIA LA C. TOT.CONFERITO LACCO AMENO 19,98 LETTERE 13,34 SAVIANO 835,08 MELITO 47,98 LIVERI SCISCIANO MONTE DI PROCIDA MARIGLIANELLA SOMMA VESUVIANA 1,42 STIR CAIVANO MARANO 71,36 MARIGLIANO 40,32 SORRENTO COMUNE CONFERITO COMUNE CONFERITO MUGNANO 8,26
    [Show full text]
  • Geomorphological Evolution of Phlegrean Volcanic Islands Near Naples, Southern Italy1
    Berlin .Stuttgart Geomorphological evolution of Phlegrean volcanic islands near Naples, southern Italy1 by G.AIELLO, D.BARRA, T.DE PIPPO, C.DONADIO, and C.PETROSINO with 9 figures and 5 tables Summary. Using volcanological, morphological, palaeoecological and geoarchaeological data we reconstructed the complex evolution of the island volcanic system of Procida-Vivara, situated west of Naples betweenthe lsland of lschia and the PhlegreanFields, far the last 75 ky. Late Pleistocenemorphological evolution was chiefly controlled by a seriesof pyroclas­ tic eruptions that resulted in at least eight volcanic edifices, mainly under water. Probably the eruptive centresshifted progressively clockwise until about 18 ky BP when volcanic develop­ ment on the islands ceased. The presenceof stretches of marine terraces and traces of wave cut notches, both be­ low and abovè'current sea levels, the finding of exposed infralittoral rnicrofossils, and the identification of three palaeo-surfacesburied by palaeosoilsindicates at least three differen­ tial uplift phases.These phases interacted with postglacial eustaticfIuctuations, and were sep­ arated by at least two periods of generai stability in vertical movements. A final phase of ground stability, characterisedby the deposition of Phlegrean and lschia pyroclastics, start­ ed in the middle Holocene. Finally, fIattened surfacesand a sandy tombolo developedup to the present-day. Recent archaeological surveys and soil-borings at Procida confirm the presence of a lagoon followed by marshland at the back of a sandy tombolo that were formed after the last uplift between the Graeco-Roman periodandthe15di_16dicentury. These areaswere gradu­ ally filled with marine and continental sedimentsup to the 20di century. ' Finally, our investigation showed that the volcanic sector of Procida-Vivara in the late Pleistocene-Holocenewas affected by vertical displacementswhich were independent of and less marked than the concurrent movement in the adjacent sectors of lschia and of the Phle­ grean Fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Statuto Comunale E Dei Regolamenti Di Prestazione Concernenti Servizi Di Interesse Generale
    Ministero dell'Interno - http://statuti.interno.it COMUNE DI MONTE DI PROCIDA STATUTO TITOLO PRIMO PRINCIPI GENERALI E ORDINAMENTO CAPO I PRINCIPI GENERALI Articolo 1 - TERRITORIO - SEDE – STEMMA 1. La comunità di Monte di Procida, organizzata nel territorio identificato dalla corrispondente circoscrizione amministrativa, è costituita in Comune autonomo secondo i principi fissati dalla Costituzione, dalle leggi della Repubblica e dal presente Statuto. 2. Il territorio comunale è circoscritto nei 12 fogli di mappe catastali in essere alla data odierna (per una superficie complessiva di 3,650 Kmq) e confina per tre quarti col Mare Tirreno e per un quarto col Comune di Bacoli. 3. La sede del Comune, centro rappresentativo e di riunione degli organi, è la Casa comunale in Via Panoramica. 4. Lo stemma ed il gonfalone sono i simboli del Comune di Monte di Procida. 5. Lo stemma, in forma ovoidale, è racchiuso in una cornice sormontata da una corona e raffigura in primo piano un’ancora, che, nella parte superiore, tocca dei tralci di vite con grappoli 1 Ministero dell'Interno - http://statuti.interno.it d’uva. Sotto la vite, dietro l’ancora, è raffigurato, nella parte superiore, il cielo con alcune nubi bianche e, nella parte inferiore, il mare. Al centro dello stemma, al confluire del cielo col mare, è raffigurato un veliero e sullo sfondo un paesaggio di terraferma. 6. Il gonfalone è costituito da un drappo azzurro ove campeggia, al centro, lo stemma del Comune. Articolo 2 - STATUTO 1. Il presente Statuto è l'atto fondamentale formato dal Consiglio Comunale con il concorso delle rappresentanze della società civile organizzate nella comunità, per garantire e regolare l'esercizio dell'autonomia normativa ed organizzativa del Comune, nell'ambito dei principi fissati dalla legge.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of Alien Marine Species of the Ischia Island (Gulf of Naples)
    AN ANNOTATED LIST OF ALIEN MARINE SPECIES OF THE ISCHIA ISLAND (GULF OF NAPLES) This contribution was presented as a poster at the BioMarine Workshop “Management of Bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea - a way forward”, held on the island of Ischia on 4-5 May 2016, with the aim of updating the information and providing the workshop’s participants with a list of the alien taxa that have been recorded in the area hosting the meeting. The island of Ischia, and the nearby islands of Procida and Vivara (Phlaegrean islands), are located on the northern side of the Gulf of Naples, and are included within the Marine Protected Area of the “Regno di Nettuno” (“Neptune’s Realm”) since April 2008 (Gambi et al., 2003). The Phlaegrean islands are considered a biogeographic boundary which constitutes the distribution limit of most South Mediterranean thermophilous species, since the 14 °C minimum winter surface temperature isotherm (the 14 °C divide) is occurring between Ischia and the Pontine archipelago (e.g., Ventotene island) (Gambi et al., 2009; Gambi, 2014). In the past two decades, due to global warming also detected in the Mediterranean surface waters, we observed a northward shift of the 14° C divide, while the minimum winter isotherm in the area of the Phlaegrean islands is now often rising to the 15 °C divide. Therefore this zone is an interesting observatory for the distribution and migratory pattern of thermophilous species both native and introduced/aliens (Gambi, 2014). Occurrence and increase in the abundance of some native Mediterranean warm-species have been documented for this area (Dappiano and Gambi, 2004; Cigliano et al., 2007; Gambi, 2014), as for the coral Astroides calycularis (Pallas, 1776), the bryozoan Calpensia nobilis (Esper, 1796), and the fishes Sparisoma cretense (L., 1758), Sphoeroides pachygaster (Müller & Troschel, 1848) and Sphyraena viridensis Cuvier, 1829.
    [Show full text]
  • Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P
    Pedigree of the Wilson Family N O P Namur** . NOP-1 Pegonitissa . NOP-203 Namur** . NOP-6 Pelaez** . NOP-205 Nantes** . NOP-10 Pembridge . NOP-208 Naples** . NOP-13 Peninton . NOP-210 Naples*** . NOP-16 Penthievre**. NOP-212 Narbonne** . NOP-27 Peplesham . NOP-217 Navarre*** . NOP-30 Perche** . NOP-220 Navarre*** . NOP-40 Percy** . NOP-224 Neuchatel** . NOP-51 Percy** . NOP-236 Neufmarche** . NOP-55 Periton . NOP-244 Nevers**. NOP-66 Pershale . NOP-246 Nevil . NOP-68 Pettendorf* . NOP-248 Neville** . NOP-70 Peverel . NOP-251 Neville** . NOP-78 Peverel . NOP-253 Noel* . NOP-84 Peverel . NOP-255 Nordmark . NOP-89 Pichard . NOP-257 Normandy** . NOP-92 Picot . NOP-259 Northeim**. NOP-96 Picquigny . NOP-261 Northumberland/Northumbria** . NOP-100 Pierrepont . NOP-263 Norton . NOP-103 Pigot . NOP-266 Norwood** . NOP-105 Plaiz . NOP-268 Nottingham . NOP-112 Plantagenet*** . NOP-270 Noyers** . NOP-114 Plantagenet** . NOP-288 Nullenburg . NOP-117 Plessis . NOP-295 Nunwicke . NOP-119 Poland*** . NOP-297 Olafsdotter*** . NOP-121 Pole*** . NOP-356 Olofsdottir*** . NOP-142 Pollington . NOP-360 O’Neill*** . NOP-148 Polotsk** . NOP-363 Orleans*** . NOP-153 Ponthieu . NOP-366 Orreby . NOP-157 Porhoet** . NOP-368 Osborn . NOP-160 Port . NOP-372 Ostmark** . NOP-163 Port* . NOP-374 O’Toole*** . NOP-166 Portugal*** . NOP-376 Ovequiz . NOP-173 Poynings . NOP-387 Oviedo* . NOP-175 Prendergast** . NOP-390 Oxton . NOP-178 Prescott . NOP-394 Pamplona . NOP-180 Preuilly . NOP-396 Pantolph . NOP-183 Provence*** . NOP-398 Paris*** . NOP-185 Provence** . NOP-400 Paris** . NOP-187 Provence** . NOP-406 Pateshull . NOP-189 Purefoy/Purifoy . NOP-410 Paunton . NOP-191 Pusterthal .
    [Show full text]
  • P.06.1 Disciplina Del Territorio Comuni Di Ischia, Casamicciola Terme, Lacco Ameno, Forio D'ischia, Serrara Fontana, Barano D'ischia, Procida, Capri, Anacapri
    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Quarto Giugliano di Napoli ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Massa Lubrense Pozzuoli P.06.1 Disciplina del territorio Comuni di Ischia, Casamicciola Terme, Lacco Ameno, Forio d'Ischia, Serrara Fontana, Barano d'Ischia, Procida, Capri, Anacapri scala 1:25.000 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Capri ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Anacapri ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Legenda ! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!! ! EEE ! limiti provinciali ! !!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! limiti comunali ! ! ! ! ! ! Aree e componenti di interesse naturalistico ! ! Bacoli ! ! art. 33 Aree ad elevata naturalità ! ! ! art. 34 Aree
    [Show full text]
  • An Update of Marine Alien Species Off the Ischia Island (Tyrrhenian Sea), with a Closer Look at Neglected Invasions of Lophocladia Lallemandii (Rhodophyta)
    AN UPDATE OF MARINE ALIEN SPECIES OFF THE ISCHIA ISLAND (TYRRHENIAN SEA), WITH A CLOSER LOOK AT NEGLECTED INVASIONS OF LOPHOCLADIA LALLEMANDII (RHODOPHYTA) The island of Ischia, the largest of the Phlaegrean islands (Gulf of Naples), is included within the Marine Protected Area (MPA) of the “Regno di Nettuno” (“Neptune’s Realm”) since April 2008. This area, as well as the Gulf of Naples, represents an interesting observatory to study the distribution and range expansion of thermophilous species both native and introduced/aliens (Gambi, 2014; Gambi et al., 2016). During the BioMarine Workshop “Management of Bioinvasions in the Mediterranean Sea – a way forward”, held in the island of Ischia on 4-5 May 2016 (Gambi and Galil, 2016), we produced a first annotated list of the marine alien taxa recorded from the island of Ischia (Gambi et al., 2016). In that report, a total of 22 alien species were documented including 1 dynoflagellate, 4 macroalgae, 1 sponge, 3 hydrozoans, 7 polychaetes, 2 molluscs, 2 crustaceans, 1 bryozoan and 1 fish (Tab. 1). With this contribution we update that list, presenting 6 additional marine alien species recorded from the coasts of Ischia, together with a taxonomic emendation of one of the previously reported species. Two of these alien taxa have been signalled through the Citizen Science web site of the MPA “Regno di Nettuno” (www.citizensciencerdn.org) (Gambi et al., 2018). The 7 taxa newly reported for the zone are: the red algaLophocladia lallemandii (Montagne) F. Schmitz 1893; the isopods Paracerceis sculpta (Holmes, 1904) and Paranthura japonica Richardson, 1909; the amphipod Caprella scaura Templeton, 1836; the heterobranch mollusc Aplysia dactylomela Rang, 1828; the bryozoan Celleporaria brunnea (Hinck, 1884), and the tunicate Styela plicata (Lesueur, 1823).
    [Show full text]
  • A Companion to the Archaeology of Early Greece and the Mediterranean, Volume 2
    CHAPTER 5.9 The Bay of Naples Matteo D’Acunto Introduction and Topography For the ancient Greeks, Campania in a broad sense meant the Bay of Naples, from Cape Misenum to the Sorrentine peninsula. It took its name from its shape, something like a krater (Strabo 5.4.8). Campania stretches inland to incorporate the volcanic region of the Phlegrean Fields (Campi Flegrei), and the territory from the rivers Volturnus and Clanis at the northwest, an area renowned in antiquity for its fertility, to Mount Vesuvius and the valley of the river Sarno on the east, right up to the ridges of the Apennines. The Bay of Naples includes the volcanic islands of Ischia and Procida with Vivara, north beyond Cape Misenum, as well as the island of Capri just off the Sorrentine peninsula at the south. Pithekoussai was established on Ischia, whilst Cumae (Greek Kyme), Dikaiarcheia (Pozzuoli), and Parthenope/Neapolis (Naples) were founded on the coastline. One of the main purposes of the foundation of Cumae – probably the most important one – was to control the northern areas up to the river Clanis for agriculture. The Etruscan center of Capua domi- nated the Campanian plain close to the Volturnus. South of the Sorrentine peninsula, the main Etruscan settlement of Pontecagnano held the Picentino plain up to the river Sele (Strabo 5.4.3–13; Polybius 3.91; Pliny, Natural History, 3.60–65; cf. Frederiksen 1984: pp. 1–30; Mele 2014: pp. VII–XIII). According to an early tradition, Lake Avernus, close to Cumae, was the location for the gates of Hades, also an oracle where one might consult the souls of the dead, whilst nearby flowed the infernal river Styx and the swamp of the Acheron stretched (Pseudo-Scymnus, Periplous or Periegesis 236–243; Ephorus, FGrHist 70 F 134 = Strabo 5.4.5; cf.
    [Show full text]
  • ALLEGATO C L. R. N.7 -05 2012.NAPOLI
    ART. 6 - L.R. 7/2005 ALL. C - CONTRIBUTI ANNO 2012 - PROVINCIA DI NAPOLI VALORE N. POS. PRO LOCO COMUNE PUNTI CONTRIBUTO UNITARIO NA 2 AGEROLA AGEROLA 69 € 20,298 € 1.400,56 NA 3 ARZANESE ARZANO 74 € 20,298 € 1.502,05 NA ASS.NE PRO LOCO CITTA' PIANO DI PIANO DI SORRENTO 14 € 20,298 € 284,17 4/12 SORRENTO NA 7 BRUSCIANO BRUSCIANO 23 € 20,298 € 466,85 NA IL MONDO NUOVO CALVIZZANO 45 € 20,298 € 913,41 8/10 NA 9 CAMPOSANO CAMPOSANO 66 € 20,298 € 1.339,67 NA 10 CASALNUOVO CASALNUOVO DI NAPOLI 29 € 20,298 € 588,64 NA 12 CASANDRINO CASANDRINO 69 € 20,298 € 1.400,56 NA 13 CASOLA DI NAPOLI CASOLA DI NAPOLI 68 € 20,298 € 1.380,26 NA 16 CASTRUM CASTELLO DI CISTERNA 52 € 20,298 € 1.055,50 NA 17 CICCIANO CICCIANO 72 € 20,298 € 1.461,46 NA 18 CIMITILE CIMITILE 49 € 20,298 € 994,60 NA 20 HERCVLANEVM ERCOLANO 62 € 20,298 € 1.258,48 ASS.NE PRO LOCO FRANCESCO NA 21 FRATTAMAGGIORE 48 € 20,298 € 974,30 DURANTE DI FRATTAMAGGIORE NA 22 FRATTAMINORE FRATTAMINORE 35 € 20,298 € 710,43 NA 23 CITTA' DI GIUGLIANO IN CAMPANIA GIUGLIANO IN CAMPANIA 72 € 20,298 € 1.461,46 NA 24 LITORALE DOMITIO GIUGLIANO IN CAMPANIA 70 € 20,298 € 1.420,86 NA 26 LETTERE LETTERE 36 € 20,298 € 730,73 NA 27 PRO LOCO DI MARANO MARANO DI NAPOLI 15 € 20,298 € 304,47 NA PRO LOCO - CITTA' DI MARIGLIANO MARIGLIANO 27 € 20,298 € 548,05 29/10 NA 31 DUE GOLFI MASSA LUBRENSE 74 € 20,298 € 1.502,05 PRO LOCO TERRA DELLE SIRENE - NA 32 META 66 € 20,298 € 1.339,67 ONLUS NA 33 MONTE DI PROCIDA MONTE DI PROCIDA 44 € 20,298 € 893,11 NA PRO LOCO PIMONTE PIMONTE 59 € 20,298 € 1.197,58 34/10 NA 35 PRO LOCO
    [Show full text]
  • Relazione Descrittiva
    COMUNE DI MONTE DI PROCIDA PROVINCIA DI NAPOLI PASSEGGIATA STORICO-PAESISTICA SUI LAGHI E LE ISOLE FLEGREE. RECUPERO DEL COLLEGAMENTO TRA IL BELVEDERE SUL CANALE DI PROCIDA E L’AREA ARCHEOLOGICA DI CAPPELLA ATTRAVERSO L’ANTICO PERCORSO DI VIA MERCATO DEL SABATO PROGETTO DEFINITIVO RELAZIONE DICEMBRE 2004 – MAGGIO 2005 2 SOMMARIO PREMESSA ......................................................................................................5 INTRODUZIONE DI SINTESI................................................................................9 1. IL PROGETTO: TEORIA E METODOLOGIA .........................................................13 1.1 PAESAGGIO COME CULTURA ...........................................................................13 1.2 LA STORIA DEI LUOGHI.................................................................................15 1.3 LA STORIA ATTRAVERSO I TOPONIMI................................................................18 1.4 LA STORIA NELLE DESCRIZIONI LETTERARIE.......................................................19 1.5 LA LEGGENDA ED IL MITO.............................................................................21 1.6 IL VI LIBRO DELL’ENEIDE ............................................................................22 2. IL PROGETTO: INQUADRAMENTO GENERALE ...................................................25 2.1 IL PERCORSO .............................................................................................26 2.2 L’APPRODO DAL MARE ..................................................................................28
    [Show full text]
  • Tavola a Quadranti Territoriali Per Gli Impianti Esistenti 4
    Contenuti del PTCP in materia di pianificazione urbanistica e territoriale per le zone interessate da stabilimenti a rischio di incidente rilevante PARTE II - ALLEGATI CARTOGRAFICI TAVOLA A QUADRANTI TERRITORIALI PER GLI IMPIANTI ESISTENTI 4. QUADRANTE CAIVANO - 1) Ultragas (Caivano) - 2) PPG Industries (Caivano) - 3) Evergas Sud (Caivano) 5. QUADRANTE POMIGLIANO - 1) ISO (Afragola) 3. QUADRANTE NAPOLI NORD 6. QUADRANTE NOLA - 2) Samagas (Castello di Cisterna) - 3) Ramoil (Casalnuovo) - 1) Vesuvio Gas (Frattamaggiore) - 1) Alenia (Nola) - 4) AVIO (Pomigliano d'Arco) - 2) Perfetto Chemical products (S.Antimo) - 2) S.C.E. Cantone Energia (Nola) - 3) Alenia (Casoria) 2. QUADRANTE GIUGLIANO - 1) Enel Produzione (Giugliano) - 2) Fireworks Sud (Giugliano) 4 - 3) Bacogas (Qualiano) 6 11. QUADRANTE SAVIANO - 4) IMPE (Qualiano) 2 3 - 1) So.ve.gas (Saviano) 5 I N D U S T R I E A R I S C H I O 11 D I I N C I D E N T E R I L E V A N T E 7. QUADRANTE NAPOLI-PIANURA - 1) Manna Giuseppe (Napoli) 7 T A V O L A A 8 Q U A D R A N T I T E R R I T O R I A L I 9 D E G L I I M P I A N T I E S I S T E N T I 1. QUADRANTE BACOLI 1 - 1) Vingas (Bacoli) 8. QUADRANTE NAPOLI Zona Industriale 9. QUADRANTE POGGIOMARINO - 1) Energas (Napoli) 10 - 1) Napoletana Calor (Poggiomarino) - 2) Esso (Napoli) - 2) Bifulco Lorenzo (Poggiomarino) - 3) Eni Gas (Napoli) - 3) Lincar Gas (Palma Campania) - 4) Italcost (Napoli) - 5) Petrolchimica Partenopea (Napoli) - 6) Kupit Deposito Costiero (Napoli) - 7) Kupit (ex-Benit) (Napoli) - 8) Goil (Napoli) 10.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vesuvius and the Other Volcanoes of Central Italy
    Geological Field Trips Società Geologica Italiana 2017 Vol. 9 (1.1) I SPRA Dipartimento per il SERVIZSERVIZIOIO GGEOLOGICOEOLOGICO D’ITALIAD’ITALIA Organo Cartografico dello Stato (legge n°68 del 2-2-1960) ISSN: 2038-4947 The Vesuvius and the other volcanoes of Central Italy Goldschmidt Conference - Florence, 2013 DOI: 10.3301/GFT.2017.01 The Vesuvius and the other volcanoes of Central Italy R. Avanzinelli - R. Cioni - S. Conticelli - G. Giordano - R. Isaia - M. Mattei - L. Melluso - R. Sulpizio GFT - Geological Field Trips geological fieldtrips2017-9(1.1) Periodico semestrale del Servizio Geologico d'Italia - ISPRA e della Società Geologica Italiana Geol.F.Trips, Vol.9 No.1.1 (2017), 158 pp., 107 figs. (DOI 10.3301/GFT.2017.01) The Vesuvius and the other volcanoes of Central Italy Goldschmidt Conference, 2013 Riccardo Avanzinelli1, Raffaello Cioni1, Sandro Conticelli1, Guido Giordano2, Roberto Isaia3, Massimo Mattei2, Leone Melluso4, Roberto Sulpizio5 1. Università degli Studi di Firenze 2. Università degli Studi di Roma 3 3. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia 4. Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II” 5. Università degli Studi di Bari Corresponding Authors e-mail addresses: [email protected] - [email protected] Responsible Director Claudio Campobasso (ISPRA-Roma) Editorial Board Editor in Chief M. Balini, G. Barrocu, C. Bartolini, 2 Gloria Ciarapica (SGI-Perugia) D. Bernoulli, F. Calamita, B. Capaccioni, Editorial Responsible W. Cavazza, F.L. Chiocci, Maria Letizia Pampaloni (ISPRA-Roma) R. Compagnoni, D. Cosentino, S. Critelli, G.V. Dal Piaz, C. D'Ambrogi, Technical Editor publishing group Mauro Roma (ISPRA-Roma) P. Di Stefano, C.
    [Show full text]