Mobilizing Nato for Afghanistan and Pakistan an Assessment of Alliance Capabilities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mobilizing Nato for Afghanistan and Pakistan an Assessment of Alliance Capabilities !"#$%$&$'()'*+"),"-) *,(.*'$/+*')0)1*2$/+*' /#1/))"))2"#$1'& /33./#!"1!/-/4.3.$.") !"#$"% &'% $(" )$*+, '& $(" -%").+"#!, /#+ !'#0%")) MOBILIZING NATO FOR AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN AN ASSESSMENT OF ALLIANCE CAPABILITIES Mobilizing NATO for Afghanistan and Pakistan: Ensuring the Alliance’s Future A Project of the Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress Co-Directors David M. Abshire W. Bruce Weinrod Project Senior Advisor General John Craddock, U.S. Army (Ret.) CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE PRESIDENCY AND CONGRESS THE CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE PRESIDENCY AND CONGRESS The Center for the Study of the Presidency and Congress, founded in 1965, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan 501(c)(3) organization. The Center’s mission is to: promote leadership in the Presidency and the Congress to generate innovative solutions to current national challenges; preserve the historic memory of the Presidency by identifying lessons from the successes and failures of such leadership; draw on a wide range of talent to offer ways to better organize an increasingly compartmentalized federal government; and educate and inspire the next generation of America’s leaders to incorporate civility, inclusiveness, and character into their public and private lives and discourse. MOBILIZING NATO FOR AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN: AN ASSESSMENT OF ALLIANCE CAPABILITIES Copyright © 2010 CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE PRESIDENCY AND CONGRESS All rights reserved. No portion of this book may be reproduced, by any process or technique, without the express written consent of the publisher. Published in the United States of America. Cover photos from NATO and ISAF. The use of international organization symbols and national flags is purely illustrative, and does not indicate any official endorsement of this report or its findings by those organizations, their member nations, or national governments. CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF THE PRESIDENCY AND CONGRESS 1020 Nineteenth Street, NW, Suite 250 Washington, D.C. 20036 Phone: 202-872-9800 Fax: 202-872-9811 www.thePresidency.org Copyright © 2010 All rights reserved MOBILIZING NATO FOR AF-PAK: AN ASSESSMENT OF ALLIANCE CAPABILITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword...................................................................................................................................................... 1 An Assessment of Alliance Capabilities: Expert Advisory Group ......................................................... 3 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 4 European/NATO Nations’ Capacity to Provide Additional Resources for Afghanistan ..................... 6 Overview ................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Additional Combat Forces......................................................................................................................................... 6 Additional Special Operations Forces (SOF)............................................................................................................ 7 Essential Equipment Requirements: (ISTAR) Assets ............................................................................................... 7 Essential Equipment Requirements: Helicopters and Aviation/Air Transport.......................................................... 7 Additional Support Forces......................................................................................................................................... 9 Redeployable Forces ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Removing Operational Constraints: National Caveats............................................................................................ 11 Duration of Deployments ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Afghan Security Forces ........................................................................................................................................... 12 Improving Development and Governance in Afghanistan.................................................................... 16 Additional Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) ............................................................................................. 16 The Law and Order Trust Fund for Afghanistan (LOTFA) .................................................................................... 16 Civilian Aid ............................................................................................................................................................. 17 NATO Operational Procedures and Practices ....................................................................................... 18 Public Campaign ..................................................................................................................................................... 18 Counterinsurgency (COIN) ..................................................................................................................................... 18 Combat Capabilities ................................................................................................................................................ 18 Civilian Mentoring .................................................................................................................................................. 18 Operational Funding................................................................................................................................................ 18 NATO Decision-making Process ............................................................................................................................ 19 Force Structure ........................................................................................................................................................ 20 Command Structure................................................................................................................................................. 20 HQ Staffing ............................................................................................................................................................. 20 ISAF-ANA Cooperation.......................................................................................................................................... 21 NATO-EU Cooperation........................................................................................................................................... 21 Development/Civil-Military Cooperation ............................................................................................................... 21 Afghan Government Reform................................................................................................................................... 21 Development............................................................................................................................................................ 22 Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) ............................................................................................................... 22 NATO and Pakistan.................................................................................................................................. 23 Appendix A: Country-by-Country Breakdown of Available Capacities ............................................. 24 Albania - Czech Republic..................................................................................................................................24-27 Denmark - Iceland .............................................................................................................................................28-34 Italy - Norway....................................................................................................................................................35-38 Poland - Slovenia...............................................................................................................................................39-42 Spain - United Kingdom ....................................................................................................................................43-46 Appendix B: NATO Contributions to KFOR and MNF-Iraq .............................................................. 48 Appendix C: Explanation of Acronyms .................................................................................................. 50 Mobilizing NATO for Afghanistan-Pakistan: Project Expert Advisory Group ................................. 51 MOBILIZING NATO FOR AF-PAK: AN ASSESSMENT OF ALLIANCE CAPABILITIES FOREWORD This initiative to reenergize NATO’s efforts in Afghanistan began in August of 2009. The goal was to help marshal key elements of the Alliance’s massive resource base to more effectively and efficiently operate in Afghanistan, while pushing NATO to adopt a strategy that encompassed not only Afghanistan, but also its neighbor, Pakistan. By developing this strategy, identifying unused or mal deployed European resources, and linking the threat of widespread regional fallout and terrorism with failure in Afghanistan and Pakistan, we hope to increase European political, military, and civilian support
Recommended publications
  • Progress in Afghanistan Bucharest Summit2-4 April 2008 Progress in Afghanistan
    © MOD NL © MOD Canada © MOD Canada Progress in Afghanistan Progress in Bucharest Summit 2-4 April 2008 Bucharest Summit2-4 Progress in Afghanistan Contents page 1. Foreword by Assistant Secretary General for Public Diplomacy, ..........................1 Jean-François Bureau, and NATO Spokesman, James Appathurai 2. Executive summary .........................................................................................................................................2 3. Security ..................................................................................................................................................................... 4 • IED attacks and Counter-IED efforts 4 • Musa Qala 5 • Operations Medusa successes - Highlights Panjwayi and Zhari 6 • Afghan National Army 8 • Afghan National Police 10 • ISAF growth 10 4. Reconstruction and Development ............................................................................................... 12 • Snapshots of PRT activities 14 • Afghanistan’s aviation sector: taking off 16 • NATO-Japan Grant Assistance for Grassroots Projects 17 • ISAF Post-Operations Humanitarian Relief Fund 18 • Humanitarian Assistance - Winterisation 18 5. Governance ....................................................................................................................................................... 19 • Counter-Narcotics 20 © MOD Canada Foreword The NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mission is approaching five years of operations in Afghanistan. This report is a
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Effectiveness and UN Resolution 1325 – Practices and Lessons from Afghanistan
    Operational Effectiveness and UN Resolution 1325 – Practices and Lessons from Afghanistan Louise Olsson & JOHAN Tejpar (Eds.) BIRGITH Andreassen, JosepH HOENEN, SYNNE HOLAN, SOPHIE Kesselaar, BJØRG Skotnes, JOHANNA VALENIUS � ���������������������� ������������������� RO_ BZ_Logo _2_301U_pos op wit_en.eps RO_ BZ_Logo _2 7462C_pos op wit_en.eps Logo ‘derden’ voor gebruik in colofon met Logo ‘derden’ voor gebruik in colofon met ongestreken papiersoorten ( UNCOATED ) op witte achtergrond gestreken papiersoorten ( COATED ) op witte achtergrond Kleur is gebaseerd op PMS 301U Kleur is gebaseerd op PMS 7462C Bij gebruik in full colour offsetdruk Bij gebruik in full colour offsetdruk omzetten naar: C100 M54 Y4 K19 omzetten naar: C100 M45 Y6 K28 RO_ BZ_Logo _2_301U_pos op kleur_en.eps RO_ BZ_Logo _2 7462C_pos op kleur_en.eps Logo ‘derden’ voor gebruik in colofon met Logo ‘derden’ voor gebruik in colofon met FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, is a mainly assignment-fundedongestreken papiersoorten agency under the ( UNCOATED Ministry of Defence. ) op gekleurde The core activitiesachtergrond are research, methodgestreken and technology papiersoorten ( COATED ) op witte achtergrond development, as well as studies conducted in the interests of Swedish defence and the safety and security of society. The organisation employs approximately 1000 per- sonnel of whom about 800 are scientists. This makes FOIKleur Sweden’s is gebaseerd largest research op institute. PMS FOI301U gives its customers access to leading-edge expertiseKleur in a islarge gebaseerd number op PMS 7462C of fields such as security policy studies, defence and securityBij gebruik related analyses,in full colour the assessment offsetdruk of various types of threat, systems for control and Bijmanagement gebruik of in crises, full colour offsetdruk protection against and management of hazardous substances,omzetten IT security naar: and theC100 potential M54 offered Y4 by K19 new sensors.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Conflict-Related Detainees in Afghan Custody One Year On” and Changing the Determined Deadline for Presentation of the Response on the Said Report
    Treatment of Conflict-Related Detainees in Afghan Custody One Year On United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights January 2013 Kabul, Afghanistan Contents Glossary ........................................................................................................................................................... i UNAMA’s Mandate ......................................................................................................................................ii Access and Methodology ..........................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................... 1 Map 1: Detention Facilities Visited by UNAMA.............................................................................. 26 Map 2: Detention Facilities where Incidents Occurred .............................................................. 27 Map 3: Detainee Accounts of Treatment in ALP, ANA, ANP and NDS Locations ................ 28 Treatment of Detainees by the National Directorate of Security ........................................... 29 Map 4: Multiple Incidents in NDS Custody in Ten Provinces ................................................... 42 Map 5: Systematic and Sufficiently Credible and Reliable Incidents in NDS Custody ..... 45 Treatment of Detainees by the Afghan National Police and Afghan
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistan Order of Battle by Wesley Morgan December 2012
    Coalition Combat Forces in Afghanistan AFGHANISTAN ORDER OF BATTLE by Wesley Morgan December 2012 This document describes the composition and placement of U.S. and other Western combat forces in Afghanistan down to battalion level. It includes the following categories of units: maneuver (i.e. infantry, armor, and cavalry) units, which in most cases are responsible for particular districts or provinces; artillery units, including both those acting as provisional maneuver units and those in traditional artillery roles; aviation units, both rotary and fixed-wing; military police units; most types of engineer and explosive ordnance disposal units; and “white” special operations forces, described in general terms. It does not include “black” special operations units or other units such as logistical, transportation, medical, and intelligence units or Provincial Reconstruction Teams. International Security Assistance Force / United States ForcesAfghanistan (Gen. John Allen, USMC)ISAF Headquarters, Kabul Special Operations Joint Task ForceAfghanistan / NATO Special Operations Component CommandAfghanistan (Maj. Gen. Raymond Thomas III, USA)Camp Integrity, Kabul1 Combined Joint Special Operations Task ForceAfghanistan (USA)Bagram Airfield; village stability operations, Afghan commando advisors, and other SOF missions2 Special Operations Task ForceEast (USA)Bagram Airfield; operating in eastern Afghanistan Special Operations Task ForceSouth (USA)Kandahar Airfield; operating in Kandahar Province Special Operations Task ForceSouth-East (USN)U/I location; operating in Uruzgan and Zabul Provinces Special Operations Task ForceWest (USMC)Camp Lawton, Herat; operating in western Afghanistan and Helmand Province TF Balkh / 2-7 Infantry (Lt. Col. Todd Kelly, USA)Camp Mike Spann, Mazar-e-Sharif; operating in northern Afghanistan 3 TF 3-69 Armor (Lt. Col. Orestees Davenport, USA)U/I location; possibly attached to CJSOTF-A in Ghazni Province 4 ISAF Special Operations Forces / Special Operations Command and Control Element (Brig.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Commission on Cyprus's Progress
    FROM THE COMMISSION ON CYPRUS’S PROGRESS TOWARDS ACCESSION *********************** 8 November 2000 Table of contents A. Introduction.............................................................................. 5 a) Preface .............................................................................................................5 b) Relations between the European Union and Cyprus ...................................7 Recent developments under the Association Agreement (including bilateral trade) ........................................................................................................................... 7 Accession Partnership................................................................................................. 8 Community Aid .......................................................................................................... 8 Twinning..................................................................................................................... 9 Negotiations ................................................................................................................ 9 B. Criteria for membership ....................................................... 10 1. Political criteria.................................................................................... 10 Introduction............................................................................................................... 10 Recent developments ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Field Experience with a Chitosan-Based Haemostatic
    6-Seiter Sonderdruck Form-01 15.08.2011 10:56 Uhr Seite 1 Reprint from MCIF 3. /4-2011 Reprint from MCIF 3./4 -2011 E. C. T. H. TAN, C. P. BLEEKER (NETHERLANDS) Field experience with a chitosan-based haemostatic dressing B Uncontrolled hemorrhage is the leading cause of death among combat casualties A and is the second major cause of death in civilian trauma patients. Major impro- vements have been made in the deve- lopment of novel dressings with D haemostatic properties to control heavy bleeding in non-compressible areas. We describe the use of chitosan gauze (Celox GauzeTM), a chitosan-based hae- mostatic agent for the control of massive traumatic bleeding in 7 patients. C Introduction Fig. 9: A CeloxTM Gauze; B ChitoGauzeTM; C HemCon®; D QuikClot® Gauze (previously Combat Gauze). Bleeding remains a leading cause of death in trauma patients, both in civilian Table 2: Overview of a number of haemostatic dressings (prices October 2010 in the Netherlands). and military settings. Military experience in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan has led Fig. 1: Lifeliner 3’s mobile medical team in action during an operation. Product Material Cost in € Effective- Shelf Side Use Weight Regis- Website to the introduction of the Combat Appli- (excl. VAT) ness life effects tration International importer cation Tourniquet (CAT-T®)(1) to treat haemostatic dressing in the field based on tracted from shrimp, cross react with red Dutch distributor severe bleeding from the extremities and BATLS 2006 JSP (57). Many comparative blood cells and form a solid clot, regard- Celox Chitosan 43,50 + 3 yr None USA, Singapore, 57 gram FDA + http://www.celoxmedical.com/ haemostatic dressings for severe bleeding animal studies 1-8 and case series 9-12 less of the natural clotting mechanism of Gauze Germany, Poland, CE+ index.htm from extremities, head, neck and torso.
    [Show full text]
  • From Kinshasa to Kandahar: Canada and Fragile States in Historical Perspective
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2016-05 From Kinshasa to Kandahar: Canada and Fragile States in Historical Perspective Carroll, Michael K; Donaghy, Greg University of Calgary Press Carroll, M.K. & Donaghy, G. (2016). "From Kinshasa to Kandahar: Canada and Fragile States in Historical Perspective." Beyond Boundaries: Canadian Defence and Strategic Studies Series; no. 6. University of Calgary Press, Calgary, Alberta. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/51199 book http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca FROM KINSHASA TO KANDAHAR: Canada and Fragile States in Historical Perspective Edited by Michael K. Carroll and Greg Donaghy ISBN 978-1-55238-845-7 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gordian Knot: American and British Policy Concerning the Cyprus Issue: 1952-1974
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLICY CONCERNING THE CYPRUS ISSUE: 1952-1974 Michael M. Carver A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2006 Committee: Dr. Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor Dr. Gary R. Hess ii ABSTRACT Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor This study examines the role of both the United States and Great Britain during a series of crises that plagued Cyprus from the mid 1950s until the 1974 invasion by Turkey that led to the takeover of approximately one-third of the island and its partition. Initially an ancient Greek colony, Cyprus was conquered by the Ottoman Empire in the late 16th century, which allowed the native peoples to take part in the island’s governance. But the idea of Cyprus’ reunification with the Greek mainland, known as enosis, remained a significant tenet to most Greek-Cypriots. The movement to make enosis a reality gained strength following the island’s occupation in 1878 by Great Britain. Cyprus was integrated into the British imperialist agenda until the end of the Second World War when American and Soviet hegemony supplanted European colonialism. Beginning in 1955, Cyprus became a battleground between British officials and terrorists of the pro-enosis EOKA group until 1959 when the independence of Cyprus was negotiated between Britain and the governments of Greece and Turkey. The United States remained largely absent during this period, but during the 1960s and 1970s came to play an increasingly assertive role whenever intercommunal fighting between the Greek and Turkish-Cypriot populations threatened to spill over into Greece and Turkey, and endanger the southeastern flank of NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Netherlands' Approach to Its PRT Operations in Afghanistan
    The Netherlands’ approach to its PRT operations in Afghanistan? April 2007 PRT Mission statement “Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRT’s) will assist the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan to extend it’s authority, in order to facilitate the development of a stable and secure environment in the identified area of operations, and enable Security Sector Reform (SSR) and reconstruction efforts” (Source; COMJFC Brunssum Revised OPLAN 30302 annex LL) Introduction The Netherlands have been closely involved in the deployment of troops and development assistance to Afghanistan under NATO’s ISAF –operation. First in the northern province of Baghlan and then, from April 2006 onwards, in Uruzgan province in the south. Considering the ever -growing international attention to ISAF -operations, and the ever closer cooperation between the various ISAF –contributing partners and civilian organisations, what follows is a short summary of the Netherlands’ approach to its PRT –operations in Afghanistan for all those civilian as well as military actors involved in Afghanistan. This article is meant to be merely informative, and is not to be considered an exhaustive summary of all the various elements influencing the Netherlands’ PRT –approach in Afghanistan. Contents 1. PRT Guiding Principles 2. Organisation and Civil-Military Integration 3. Components and Responsibilities 4. Concept of Operations 1. PRT Guiding Principles The Netherlands’ approach to its PRT operations is embedded in both the international principles for the functioning of PRTs, as well as in a number of particular Dutch policy frameworks. International Principles The main international guiding principles for all NATO PRTs in Afghanistan were publicized in NATO’s ISAF PRT Handbook.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Stakes Battle for the Future of Musa Qala
    JULY 2008 . VOL 1 . ISSUE 8 The High Stakes Battle for district. This created the standard and treated their presumed supporters in of small landlords farming small, the south better,5 this time there would the Future of Musa Qala well-irrigated holdings. While tribal be no mercy shown to “collaborators.” structure, economy and population alike This included executing, along with By David C. Isby have been badly damaged by decades of alleged criminals, several “spies,” which warfare, Musa Qala has a situation that included Afghans who had taken part in since its reoccupation by NATO and is more likely to yield internal stability work-for-food programs.6 Afghan forces in December 2007, the by building on what is left of traditional remote Musa Qala district of northern Afghanistan. The Alizai are also hoping to get more Helmand Province in Afghanistan from the new security situation. They has become important to the future Before the well-publicized October 2006 have requested that Kabul make Musa course of the insurgency but also to the “truce” that Alizai leaders concluded Qala a separate province.7 This proposal future of a Pashtun tribe (the Alizai), with the Taliban, Musa Qala had has been supported by current and a republic (the Islamic Republic of experienced a broad range of approaches former Helmand provincial governors. Afghanistan) and even a kingdom (the to countering the insurgency. In addition This would provide opportunities for United Kingdom). The changes that to their dissatisfaction with British patronage and give them a legally- take place at Musa Qala will influence operations in 2006, local inhabitants recognized base that competing tribal the future of all of them.
    [Show full text]
  • Listening to Women and Girls Displaced to Urban Afghanistan
    LISTENING TO WOMEN AND GIRLS DISPLACED TO URBAN AFGHANISTAN 1 2 8 Executive summary TABLE OF 10 Introduction 10 Methodology 10 Urbanisation and the growth of informal settlements CONTENTS 11 Young not listened to 13 Vulnerabilities of urban female IDPs 13 Entrenched gender inequality 13 Early marriage and child mothers 14 Widows and female-headed households 15 Widespread domestic violence 16 Limited mobility 17 Fear of reprisals for male behaviour 17 Poverty 18 Drugs 19 Food insecurity 20 Shelter: overcrowding and Tenure insecurity 21 Poor access to water, sanitation And electricity 21 Ill-health and unaffordable health care 22 Lack of access to education 23 Psychosocial problems 26 Conclusion 29 Bibliography 33 Appendix i: methodology 36 Endnotes 3 4 THE NORWEGIAN REFUGEE COUNCIL (NRC) is an independent, humanitarian, non-profit, non- governmental organisation, established in 1946. NRC works to protect the rights of displaced and vulnerable persons during crisis. Through our programmes we provide assistance to meet immediate humanitarian needs, prevent further displacement and contribute to durable solutions. Through our advocacy we strive for rights to be upheld and for lasting solutions to be achieved. Through our stand-by rosters we provide expertise as a strategic partner to the UN, as well as to national and international actors. In Afghanistan, NRC has been assisting displacement-affected populations since 2002 with humanitarian programmes in education, shelter, legal assistance and emergency response. www.nrc.no THE LIAISON OFFICE (TLO) is an Afghan non-governmental organization that was established in 2003 at the request of south-eastern tribal elders wishing to be better integrated in the post-2001 peace and statebuilding process.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain and the Greek Security Battalions, 1943-1944
    VOL. XV, Nos. 1 & 2 SPRING-SUMMER 1988 Publisher: LEANDROS PAPATHANASIOU Editorial Board: MARIOS L. EVRIVIADES ALEXANDROS KITROEFF PETER PAPPAS YIANNIS P. ROUBATIS Managing Eidtor: SUSAN ANASTASAKOS Advisory Board: MARGARET ALEXIOU KOSTIS MOSKOFF Harvard University Thessaloniki, Greece SPYROS I. ASDRACHAS Nlcos MOUZELIS University of Paris I London School of Economics LOUKAS AXELOS JAMES PETRAS Athens, Greece S.U.N.Y. at Binghamton HAGEN FLEISCHER OLE L. SMITH University of Crete University of Copenhagen ANGELIKI E. LAIOU STAVROS B. THOMADAKIS Harvard University Baruch College, C.U.N.Y. CONSTANTINE TSOUCALAS University of Athens The Journal of the Hellenic Diaspora is a quarterly review published by Pella Publishing Company, Inc., 337 West 36th Street, New York, NY 10018-6401, U.S.A., in March, June, September, and December. Copyright © 1988 by Pella Publishing Company. ISSN 0364-2976 NOTES ON CONTRIBUTORS DAVID GILMORE is professor of anthropology at the State Uni- versity of New York at Stony Brook . MOLLY GREENE is a doc- toral candidate at Princeton University . CLIFFORD P. HACKETT is a former aide to U.S. Representative Benjamin Rosenthal and Senator Paul Sarbanes. He is currently administering an exchange program between the U.S. Congress and the European Parliament and is also executive director of the American Council for Jean Monnet Studies . JOHN LOUIS HONDROS is professor of history at the College of Wooster, Ohio ... ADAMANTIA POLLIS is professor of political science at the Graduate Faculty of the New School for Social Re- search . JOHN E. REXINE is Charles A. Dana Professor of the Classics and director of the division of the humanities at Colgate Uni- versity .
    [Show full text]