Barbarians Invade the Roman Empire the Roman Empire Rises This Meant They Were Constantly Searching and Falls for New Land

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Barbarians Invade the Roman Empire the Roman Empire Rises This Meant They Were Constantly Searching and Falls for New Land --------------_____ Date ____ Class _____ Geography and History Adivity Barbarians Invade the Roman Empire The Roman Empire Rises This meant they were constantly searching and Falls for new land. Scientists believe the climate changed in northern Europe, becoming In 509 B.C., the Romans established a colder and damper. Food crops had a republic in central Italy. Surrounded by shorter growing season, and the northern enemies, the city was engaged in almost tribes had to move south for food. At first, continual warfare for 200 years. By 260 B.C., they also wanted to ally themselves with the Romans had conquered almost all of the Roman Empire and its vast military Italy, and within 130 years Rome was mas­ might because the Goths' lands were being ter of the entire Mediterranean Sea. The overrun by the fiercest of enemies-the Roman Empire reached its height around Huns from Asia. Once secure in Rome, A.D. 180, stretching from Britain in the however, the Goths turned on the Romans north to Arabia in the east to North Africa and fought for control of the empire. In and Egypt in the south. A.D. 410, the Visigoths sacked and looted By A.D. 200, however, the once power­ Rome. ful Roman Empire began to weaken. Civil wars, a labor shortage caused by plague, The Vandals and attacks on the outer borders occurred. People were taxed heavily to pay for more The next wave of barbarians to invade soldiers. The empire had become too large Roman territory-the Vandals-had been to protect. It was divided into the West­ forced out of northern Germany by the ern Roman Empire, with its capital still Huns as well. The Vandals conquered in Rome, and the Eastern Roman Empire, much of the Roman lands in Spain and with a new capital at Constantinople. northern Africa. Then they crossed into Italy and in A.D. 455, they too sacked vl Q) The Barbarians Rome. Today the word vandal means '§ To the Romans, anyone who was not "someone who willfully destroys someone oS- else's property." u from their culture was known as a barbar- ~ ian, a term we now use to mean "someone ~ who is brutal and destructive." Early Europe's Conquered Lands c) in the A.D. 400s, waves of barbarians, or Eventually, the Germanic invaders set­ ~ ' migrant tribes, began to cross the northern tled in various parts of the now-collapsed ~ Roman borders-the rivers of Germany Western Roman Empire. Some tribes gave ~ and Gaul (France). The Roman army was their names to the lands they conquered. ~ stretched thin. The first barbarians to take The Vandals settled in Spain, which they called [V]Andalusia. The Germanic peo­ §"~ advantage of Rome's weakness were two u German tribes-the Visigoths (west Goths) ples known as Franks settled in France. and the Ostrogoths (east Goths). The Burgundians took over the Burgundy As nomads, the Goths depleted the region of France, and the Angles crossed land around them and then moved on. the North Sea to conquer England. II Name _____ _______________ Date _____ Class _____ Geography and History Activity continued The Barbarian Invasions KEY o Imperial capital ~ Eastern Roman Empire o 300 kilometers D Western Roman Empire ~ o 300 miles f(/ Applying Geography to History 4. Naming What was the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire? Directions: Read the information about the barbarian invasion of the Roman Empire and study the map above. Then answer the questions below. 5. Identifying Which city was attacked by the Visigoths, the Vandals, and the 1. Naming Who was a "barbarian" to Ostrogoths? the Romans? 6. Identifying Which group of invaders 2. Locating Where did the first wave pushed the others into Roman territory? of invading barbarians come from? Who was their leader? 3. Specifying For what reasons did the Goths move into Roman territory? 12 .
Recommended publications
  • Reasons for the Fall of the Roman Empire
    Reasons for the Fall of the Roman Empire Barbarian Tribes Destroy the Roman Empire • Germanic Teutonic Tribes Exert Pressure(1st-4th centuries A.D.) Germanic tribes – primitive, warlike peoples – lived in central and eastern Europe. They were attracted to the Roman Empire by its fertile land, great wealth and advanced civilization. Early efforts to to enter the Empire were thwarted by Roman troops. Later, Rome permitted some Germanic peoples to settle within its borders and enlisted Germanic soldiers in its armies. The Huns Invade Europe (4th-5th centuries A.D.) • The Huns, savage invaders from central Asia, terrorized Europe, causing many Germanic tribes to flee into the Roman Empire. Attila the Hun Ravaged the empire until turned back by a combined Roman-Germanic force. Nevertheless, the Huns had weakened Rome militarily. The Germanic Tribes End the Roman Empire (4th and 5th centuries A.D.) Full scale German migrations into Roman territory could not be stemmed by the enfeebled Roman government. Gradually, the Germanic tribes established kingdoms within the Empire: the Visigoths in Spain, the Ostrogoths in Italy, the Vandals in North Africa, the Franks in Gaul and the Angles and Saxons in Britain. Why could the Germanic tribes crush Rome, so long the master of the Mediterranean world? The answer lies not in Germanic strength but in Roman weakness. By the fourth and fifth centuries A.D., the Roman Empire had declined because of the following internal conditions. Political • The dictatorial government was frequently inefficient and corrupt and did not command the peoples loyalty. • The vast Empire, having relatively primitive transportation and communication, could not be governed efficiently from one central city.
    [Show full text]
  • Ostrogoths, Visigoths, and Lombards the Ostrogoths, Visigo
    Ostrogoths, Visigoths, Lombards 149 CHAPTER THREE THE SUccEssOR STATES IN THE WEST: OsTROGOTHS, VISIGOTHS, AND LOMBARDS The Ostrogoths, Visigoths and Lombards all took shape as peoples in the Roman frontier region of the middle and lower Danube. In their early years, they might also be described as Roman client or even field armies, since they were often in Roman service, large segments of these people stayed loyal to the East Roman Empire, and there was at times little to distinguish them from other field armies in the Balkans that took to arms against the central government during the 5th and 6th centuries. They should there- fore be treated together as products of the Balkans military culture, but due to their inability to find satisfactory settlement in the East, they mi- grated into the chaotic West where they finally established the indepen- dent kingdoms with which we are familiar. The survey of East Roman developments in the previous chapter will show that there was more to unite the Mediterranean than to divide it, and that patterns of military organization could change at a similar pace throughout the former Roman world. 3.1 The Ostrogoths, 493-554 Theoderic’s Ostrogothic kingdom lasted only two generations, from 493 to 554, but during its heyday, it was the most successful and thoroughly Ro- manized of all the successor states. There is a general consensus that an- cient social structures, such as a high degree of urbanization and a complex economic system, survived very well during this period. The Ostrogoths absorbed surviving Roman administrative structures and collaborated closely with the Roman senatorial class.
    [Show full text]
  • 037 690305 the Trans
    Horld ElstorY >#9 h. Eoeb Hednesday P.t{. lEE TnAtrSIfIOnAt KII{GDUSs VAI{DI,LS' HEiltLI' OSIBT0ES lfter the Roam defeat bf tbe Vlaigoths at 441b,gs tn t8, rp bart the cqo- uautng eto:y of the collapse of tbe Rccdr &pfre ps fo:nd e pag€ 134 fn t+g"r. Stlllcho rt tll3 bottm of tb3 flrst col:uor rp dlscswr tbat tbe @ercr Bcrorlu a (9*t&3) rypolntect Ure VErSgl Stlllplro es Easter of tbe troops. Eere nas a sltaratlcn rbera a Uerlgqls EA ffid ofE-tbe nttltary forceel It rns not just tbat tbs C'€ina,s ;ffi-:y lrr charge of Ee rrall alorg tbe RhJ.ne, hrt,gon me of tbeo le tn obarge of tbe Rmm arry fneiae tbp r.ratl! Itrs ltke tbe cansLto nose under tbe tmt. far see litt&e ty ltttte rbat is bappentng I Golng to colu.m tvo: trr 406 Cauf. ras ,qP.rnm by Vmdals srd other trlltBs. dgpqf:re-of fn Lgt'51o tberc vas @ lccc'ed evaoratlor € Brltafg.-the..cglete t& troq>J- dates rnay:Er@g$E- sore sdrcAsErt f thl$k tbls is tbe elgplslg dg!g- for tho purposef\r1 evasusticn of the ls1ad. lnd then ln lueust of /+oB Sbilfpl*r l€g Elgl*g at Fcrelusr cdsrt ttt€ @ere did no[ tnrEt brs rnlrrtary c@EQs r.nre Just not golng rtght fcr tie fupire. Rm Sacked I relgn llotlce next that tbe @eror Theodoslus. erperor ll th9 9eg! $o b€99 -hie i" 4OS; ;i"*ua tbe earllest' colleffilf existLne lgggr tbe-lieodoela CodE.; l&eD yan_bave a good rJ"i6W bas to 16rltlply,-fi c1assl$r -md cod,l.$ none-art none latr, "tafc"trcn tbat socLety breatcnp'0gg, due to lncreased ccrlos srd Laltless:eegt lbea people ar€ Uun"":irg tb€r'selvee teet'e ls no need for a lot of lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 18 - the Situation in the West After the Fall of Rome
    Church History Lesson 18 - The Situation in the West After the Fall of Rome 1. Introduction - A Crumbling Empire 1.1. In the last session we looked at a number of Christological controversies which embroiled the church, and consequently the Empire, up until the council of Chalcedon in 451. 1.2. As we saw, these controversies involved both the East and the West, but there were of far greater concern in the East than in the West, and the majority of bishops attending the various councils were overwhelmingly from the East. 1.3. Although there were a number of reasons for this, one of the major reasons was the rapidly changing situation in the West. After Rome was sacked for the first time in 410 AD, it sent shockwaves through the whole empire, but especially in the West. Although the Eastern part of the Empire continued in one form or another for over 1,000 years more, the situation in the West was far different. 1.4. Today we will take a brief look at what happened in the West after the first sacking of Rome in 410, and see how this affected life and the church in the West for the next 300 years or so. 2. The Barbarian Invasions 2.1. The events that most affected life and the church in the West were a series of invasions by “barbarian” tribes. 2.2. Obviously the first major invasion was when Alaric and his band of Visigoths, who invaded Italy and sacked Rome in 410. It was the shockwaves from this event that caused Augustine to write his opus City of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbarians Invade Rome! Questions
    But the power of Rome was weakening. By the late 400s, Rome was Name no longer the mighty power that it had once been. In 476, the Hun leader, Odoacer, seized power in the western half of the Roman Empire and declared himself king of Italy. Barbarians Invade Rome! The eastern half of the Roman Empire tried to take power back in the west by sending troops, under the leadership of King Theodoric By Sharon Fabian of the Ostrogoths, to fight Odoacer. The Ostrogoths killed Odoacer, and Theodoric became the new leader of Italy. The Roman Empire, at its height, extended across much of Europe, but even then there were other groups of people who were The Roman Empire in the east continued, but Roman rule in the not part of the Roman Empire living in Europe too. Many of these west had come to an end. Europe entered into an era of uncertainty. groups, called tribes, lived in the far north. Others lived in various Rulers changed frequently, as one leader attacked and defeated parts of Europe not occupied by the Roman Empire. another. Invasions, attacks, and feuds were commonplace. It was the beginning of the Middle Ages. The barbarian tribes, as many of them were known, didn't like the idea of settling down and farming. They preferred a roaming, Today, when we hear of Huns, we picture wild-eyed, long-haired, warlike lifestyle. Due to climate changes and other factors, many of screaming invaders. the tribes began to migrate closer to the Roman Empire and sometimes even settle within the borders of the empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Visigoths and Romans: Integration and Ethnicity
    Neal 1 Jennifer Neal May 9, 2011 Final Thesis Visigoths and Romans: Integration and Ethnicity Outside of Inginius’ fine home in Narbo, the January weather was far from pleasant. Inside the main apartments of the house, a woman and man sat beside each other enacting a Christian marriage ceremony. Emblems lay heavy against the woman’s body, indicating her imperial rank. Poised and proper as ever, she glanced again at the man who sat beside her wearing the garb of a Roman general and looking pleased. The audience gazed at her, exclaiming quietly at her beauty and the simple gown that draped from her shoulders. She smiled and turned her attention to the youths standing before her. Fifty young men, all dressed in different colors of silk, held platters that overflowed with gold and jewels so precious they nearly took her breath away. The irony almost drew a laugh from her lips. All of the wealth on those platters might be gifts meant to impress her, but they had been stolen from the coffers of her fellow Roman nobles during the Sack of Rome.1 That woman was Galla Placidia. The year was 414 and Galla Placidia, Roman princess and half-sister of Honorius, emperor of the Western Empire, sat next to Athaulf, barbarian king of the Visigoths.2 Willing as she was to marry Athaulf, there was no disguising the fact that he and his army of barbarians had pillaged her home and the surrounding areas to gain the treasure he now presented to her. Yet for all his Roman trappings, Athaulf was no Roman.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ostrogoths from the Migration Period to the Sixth Century: an Ethnographic Perspective'
    H-German West on Barnish and Marazzi and Stress., 'The Ostrogoths From the Migration Period to the Sixth Century: An Ethnographic Perspective' Review published on Monday, March 9, 2009 S. J. B. Barnish, Federico Marazzi, eds., Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Social Stress. The Ostrogoths From the Migration Period to the Sixth Century: An Ethnographic Perspective. Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology. Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 2007. 497 pp. $105.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-1-84383-074-0. Reviewed by Charles West (Department of History, Sheffield University) Published on H-German (March, 2009) Commissioned by Susan R. Boettcher Laughing at the Ostrogoths It is a part of academic folk wisdom that discussions at conferences are of value equal to the actual papers delivered. The organizers of the Studies in Historical Archaeoethnology series, led by Georgio Ausenda, have taken this maxim to heart. The series, which publishes the proceedings of regular conferences held under the auspices of the Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Social Stress, remarkably includes not just reworked versions of the contributions, but also transcripts of the discussions that followed each presentation. These transcripts are taken direct from tape recordings, apparently unmediated by editorial oversight. This particular conference concerned the Ostrogoths, one of the Germanic groups whose penetration of the Roman Empire is associated, to put it no more strongly, with the collapse of that empire's western half. The Ostrogoths have a special place in that story. Emerging from the wider grouping labeled as the Goths--their name means literally "eastern Goths," as opposed to the "western Goths," or Visigoths--they took over Italy under the leadership of their greatest king, Theodoric, in 493, and for a while constituted the dominant barbarian group in western Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • The Myth - the Nordic Origins
    SHEETS The myth - The Nordic origins Original Germanic tribes The so-called “Nordic circle” (Nordischer Kreis) is indicated as the original homeland of the Germanic tribes (second millennium BC). A vast area which - considering present-day names - comprises southern Sweden and Norway, the Jutland peninsula, the Danish islands and the plains of northern Germany. The Germanic peoples of the early days were not one People, nor were the various tribes aware of a common ethnic root. Likewise, today there is no certainty as to the probable existence of an original bloodline which, in any case, belonged to the great Indo-European family. The Germanic peoples are distinguished according to three large groups: North Germanic (Varangians or Norwegian, Danish and Swedish Vikings), East Germanic and West Germanic, to each of which belonged a great number of sub-groups and tribes. The North Germanic group also includes Norwegian, Danish and Swedish Varangians (also known as Vikings). Classified in the East Germanic group were the tribes of the Goths (a group that included Visigoths, Ostrogoths, Gepids, Thervingi, Greuthungi, Crimean Goths), the Rugii, theVandals, the Herules, the Burgundians, theBastarnae, the Scirii and the Thuringians. Classified in the West Germanic group (which in turn was divided into the large groups of the Ingaevones, Irminones and Istvaeones) were the Salians, the Franks - to whom a great part of Longobard history is connected - the Chatti, the Batavi, the Ubii, the Treveri and also the Suebi (or Suevi), the Saxons, the Quadi, the Marcomanni and the Alemanni. As regards the Longobards, the few ancient sources mention them sometimes as belonging to the Eastern Germanic and sometimes to the Western Germanic tribes (Irminones) group).
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel 11:31 Arms Shall Stand on His Part Heruli Vandals Ostrogoths
    Daniel 11:31 Arms shall stand on his part Santa Sophia the church built by Justinian Clovis King of the Franks Mosaic of Justinian Coin of Justinian Emperor Justinian 493 AD 508 AD 534 AD 538 AD © David Gilmore 3-angels.net Heruli Vandals Ostrogoths Zeno 425-491 AD Clovis King of the Franks 496-511 AD Justinian Emperor of Eastern Rome 527 – 565 AD Odoacer or Odovacar the chieftain Statue depicting the baptism of In 533 AD Justinian passes a decree Belisarius drove out the Ostrogoths of the Germanic Heruli people 435 - Clovis King of the Franks at his to give the Pope absolute and total from Rome in 538 AD tipping the 493 AD ruled Rome 476-493 AD. His conversion to Roman Catholicism authority over the ecclesiastical balance of power in favour of the people had been mercenaries for in 496 AD. His "desire" to spread world . Justinian sends Belisarius his pope against Arian domination. Rome. Odoacer revolted deposing his new religion and to ruin general to start war on the vandals. When Theodoric died in 526 the new the last Roman emperor in the West Christian kingdoms which refused The Vandals were one of the two king of the Ostrogoths, Totila, Romulus Augustulus. Zeno the to bow to the Catholic version of remaining Arian Powers preventing regained most of the territory emperor in the East a friend of the thinking seemed to be the aim of the way for the Pope to take over gained by Belisarius. Rome was pope was anxious to drive out this "convert" ruler.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Catholicism. Its Struggle with Arianism for Supremacy. an Ideological Warfare
    But what is the "image to the beast"? and how is it to be formed? The image is made by the two-horned beast, and is an image to the beast. It is also called an image of the beast. Then to learn what the image is like and how it is to be formed we must study the characteristics of the beast itself—the papacy. “ {GC 443.1} "The beast" mentioned in this message, whose worship is enforced by the two-horned beast, is the first, or leopardlike beast of Revelation 13--the papacy. The "image to the beast" represents that form of apostate Protestantism which will be developed when the Protestant churches shall seek the aid of the civil power for the enforcement of their dogmas. The "mark of the beast" still remains to be defined. {GC 445.2} The Rise of Catholicism. Its struggle with Arianism for supremacy. An Ideological warfare. The Christian world was torn asunder by theological factions. Alexandria, the center of all philosophical study, was also the center of theological activity. Here is where the Greek influence was most forcibly felt. Athanasius, the leader of one faction, was archdeacon, and afterward bishop of Alexandria, and his opponent, Arius, was presbyter in the same city. {1901 SNH, SDP 229.1} Paganism and Christianity met on the battlefield when Constantine contended for the throne of Rome; paganism and Christianity met in more deadly conflict in Alexandria, where Christian and pagan schools stood side by side. Here it was that such men as Origen and Clement, recognized Fathers of the church, adopted the philosophy of the Greeks, and applied to the study of the Bible the same methods which were common in the study of Homer and other Greek writers.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference and Accommodation in Visigothic Gaul and Spain
    San Jose State University SJSU ScholarWorks Master's Theses Master's Theses and Graduate Research Spring 2010 Difference and Accommodation in Visigothic Gaul and Spain Craig H. Schamp San Jose State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses Recommended Citation Schamp, Craig H., "Difference and Accommodation in Visigothic Gaul and Spain" (2010). Master's Theses. 3789. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31979/etd.26vu-jqpq https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/3789 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Master's Theses and Graduate Research at SJSU ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of SJSU ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIFFERENCE AND ACCOMMODATION IN VISIGOTHIC GAUL AND SPAIN A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History San José State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Craig H. Schamp May 2010 © 2010 Craig H. Schamp ALL RIGHTS RESERVED The Designated Thesis Committee Approves the Thesis Titled DIFFERENCE AND ACCOMMODATION IN VISIGOTHIC GAUL AND SPAIN by Craig H. Schamp APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY SAN JOSÉ STATE UNIVERSITY May 2010 Dr. John W. Bernhardt Department of History Dr. Jonathan P. Roth Department of History Dr. Nancy P. Stork Department of English and Comparative Literature ABSTRACT DIFFERENCE AND ACCOMMODATION IN VISIGOTHIC GAUL AND SPAIN by Craig H. Schamp This thesis examines primary sources in fifth- and sixth-century Gaul and Spain and finds a surprising lack of concern for ethnicity.
    [Show full text]
  • About Invasions of Roman Empire
    CK_4_TH_HG_P087_242.QXD 10/6/05 9:02 AM Page 110 II. Europe in the Middle Ages Ireland is bordered by the Atlantic Ocean on the west and the Irish Sea on the east. The Irish Sea separates Ireland from England and Wales. The North Channel lies between Northern Ireland and Scotland. England is separated from France and Europe by the English Channel, a body of water that connects the Atlantic Ocean and the North Sea. Its northern end is called the Strait of Dover, and north of that is the North Sea. The North Sea sep- arates northern England and Scotland from Norway, Denmark, and other coun- tries in northwestern Europe. The English Channel is 300 miles (483 km) long and is an arm of the Atlantic Ocean. At its narrowest, the Channel is 21 miles (34 km) wide and at its widest, 112 miles (180 km). The fact that Great Britain is an island has been of great strategic importance in its history. After William the Conqueror and his Normans attacked in 1066, no army has invaded it since. Separated from Europe, Great Britain was able to insulate itself from some of the political and social movements that swirled across Europe. B. Background Invasions of the Roman Empire Teaching Idea The Middle Ages progressed directly out of the Roman Empire. Rome went from a republic to a vibrant expansive empire that spanned much of Europe, If there are any football fans in your North Africa, and the Middle East. But eventually the empire declined. class, ask them to explain what “sack Corruption and pressure from Germanic and other invaders eventually brought the quarterback” means (tackle the the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 CE.
    [Show full text]