DOCSLIB.ORG

Observations on American Democracy by Alexis De Tocqueville James Tyrie Jr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Observations on American Democracy by Alexis De Tocqueville James Tyrie Jr Western Kentucky University TopSCHOLAR® Government theses Government 12-1977 The aM sterless Society: Observations on American Democracy by Alexis de Tocqueville James Tyrie Jr. Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/gov_theses Part of the American Politics Commons, American Studies Commons, Political History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Tyrie, James Jr., "The asM terless Society: Observations on American Democracy by Alexis de Tocqueville" (1977). Government theses. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/gov_theses/1 This Other is brought to you for free and open access by TopSCHOLAR®. It has been accepted for inclusion in Government theses by an authorized administrator of TopSCHOLAR®. For more information, please contact [email protected]. • THE I~~TERLEJ S SOC I ETYI OB~ERVATIONJ O~ AMER ICA :1 O:.\t.:OCRACY OY ALEXr,; DE ?OCQ 'E'l ILL~ A Thesis Pronented to the Facu l ty of the De pa rtment of Government ~1c s t~rn i<ent'lc ky Il niversity BOlv 1 ing Green . Kent'lcky • In Pa rtia l Fu lfil l ment of t he Reqll irem'lots f o r the Degreo r:aster of Ar t s by J ane::: S . Tyrie , J r . • December 1977 • AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF THESIS Permis. ion 15 hereby ~ranted to the Western Kentuc ky University Library to make, or a llow to be made photocopies . microfilm or other copie s of thi s the . iII (or appropria te researc h or scholarly p urp.l se ll. re served to the author for the making of any copies of thi s O the sis except (or brief acctions for research or Icholarly • purpOICs • Signed Date Please pl03ce a.n " X; " in the a ppropriate box. Thi ll (orm will be filed with the original of the thc al.s and will control fu t u r e lIle o f the thes i li • • • cCOMMtmd<'d \ - ? 3 - t"\ B ( ::In to) • f t;:::ir o~c ~ c !f:-, b:; t ,eo l-' c / ( ApprOV erl' ~ _-~} __-L 7TIT- ~7~J~ _________ - (Ua te ) //.,-, , 'J ean of t.he Co llege • ii • ACKNOWLEDGME NTS The writer wisheo to acknowledgo hts indebtedness t o several individuals who sacrificed their time in making this paper possible. Sincere apprec iation 1s expressed to Dr . Edward N. Kearny. who suggested the topic of the thesis. His valuable comment s , insight. and guidance were of great benefit. Appreciation is alao expressed to Dr. John D. Parker and Dr. ?aye Ca rroll for their help and guldRnce. A special a ppreciation i s g iven to my wife . Betsy , for her expertise and perseverance in the ma ny hours of typing • the rr.anuscr ipt • • Hi • TABLE OF CONT E ~ITS ACKNO'IILEDGM =:NTS .... .... .. ... .. iii Cha pter 1. I NTJ.:OD 'c'r ION II . FOUNDATIONS OF FREEDOM 9 Ill. EQll AL lTY OF COND I T IO NS 20 1'1. TH E t<: ASTERLES$ SOC I ETY 35 V. ECONvrl IC f.lAfER I ALISi,: , !MSTERLESS soc I ETY 50 V I . SAFEG'!AROS AGAINST TilE .. NE·... DES POT I SN" . 62 'I ll. COHC LI'S I ON!:) • • • • . • • • . .... .... 72 • !UBLIOGP. APH Y • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • 76 • THE MASTERLESS SOCIETY , OBSERVATIONS ON AMERICAN DEr.OCRACY BY ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE James S . Tyrie . Jr. December 1977 84 pa ges Directed by, Edward N. Kearny, John D. Parker. and Faye Ca rroll Department of Government ~estern Kentucky University Prench political theorist Alexis de Tocqueville ' s views cor.earning American democracy were examined in order to discern key aspects of democratic thought and practice in America . Tocqueville found certain fundamen t8 1 pr~mises such as Ind i­ vidual freedom and "equality of cond itions" at the base of democracy in America . Prom these basic premises come several paradoxical results , namely the rnssterlesu society. economic • materiali sm. and "tyranny of the majority." The$e paradoxec a re controll ed by safeguar dS of aSA ociations, ttle preBs , and the judiciary within the system. It was found that Tocqueville' s detachment and foresight give his thought greater meaning than that of many contemporar y social and political thinkers such as Jean-Jacq ues Revel and others. This high degree of foresight and detachment make it possible fo. students to discover an~ rediscover basic facets of Ame r ican s ociety today. • • I' I':'RO~ " CT 10:1 ~lear l II one h!l:"ld red and ft f:..y j'e'!. r:: 3"'0 . n va mf' i" r en ch oo l itlcal !lcicntiGt na med ALexis de Tocq'l ev1l 1e, atone with hll1 etol'te fric:"!d CUg a ve de ~ e a l l:nont. cane to Ane rica u nder the prc tllnse of st.mbl.nl7 t h e A,'erican penn l sy:.;te"l h'a l ~f t. with who. for GaMe i :3 the true moa ninf' of "mel' lear. d cI'lOc!'ocv . '!'!l h: visit too k p Ineo in 18 1 1 and t antod nearl " one ,,{'ar . rn this rel ativelY :::hort stay , ':'ocq'JC vi tle , thro'li'h 1''.1.G pers i st.ent. qucG t loning and intcrviewinp , discerned ko') n3pects • of democrat ic thoupht. a nd pract i ce in Am e rica Which ~, 3d been over l ooked l'Jy na ny contcnpornry :.;t' ldents of Anericnn rl enocracy . roth =.:u ropcnn and Ame!"ica n . :-: ven today . Tocquev i lte ' s two 1101 '11:10 work entitled Democr a cv in flneri ca rennins a classic "" I\ rel y ma tch d in its provoc&.t \ ve pro.., in" of A:r.erican nociet~ . :" ':0 major f actors contr ih:J tc to the II niqur.nc:;s of 'l'oco" cville ' s politica l t.hour,h t . ;-' irst . '!'ocquevi l le' g de t achr.tent f rom Ame rica ke pt his f indinP-G u nfettered . H~ was k trav e l er in a s tra n r c l and a nd a s s 'lch was abl e to tnke a removed v i ewpoint of the AM e riean scene . As a s ophist i cated ~uropenn t r avel e r in a s tran~e l a nd, Tocquev ille wa s in a be tter pos ition to perce ive Anerica from a b road cosmopolitan pe r s pective rather than from a narrow • phrochial viewpoint , ? Tocquevllle ' s independence ~M nn o bBe~Ve r WOJ enhnnced • by t he fact tha t he was not only phys i ca lly rletachod f rom America via Pr a nce but a l co Ideolog icu lly douchod a nd f r e e f r om pref erences which would t end t o cl oud hlG thought . Un l ike ma ny who came t o Ame ric& with preset ldeol og i cn l notiono of democracy , Tocquev l lie was abl e t o ho ld his pr econccptlontJ at. a d iotance wh ile Observi ng. This e ~~b l ed him to give a somewhat more accu rate Rccou nt of the pol itical and socia l ins-:: itut ions he observed in the United States . If one compa r ed t he writings of Tocqueville with . for exam ple . those of Thomas Paine . one might discover he ... a n nbnence of bllndinR ideolog i ca l prefere nces i n Tocquev1l1e ' s case adds to hill uniqueness as an observer of Ame r i can i nstitutions . Thoma s Pa i ne was one of the gr eat oo t propagn nd luta nnd • pol i t i cal pam phleteerti who ever lived. But he w a~ not nn as tute observer . He came t o Amer i ca f r om Engl and w 1t.h preconceived notions of government and t he ~ o mmo n man . A l ong h i story of ea rly ha rd s hips had instilled i n him n hatred of government and a ris tocracy , together wi th an unbl emished r egard for the common man. Common Sense was n brilliant r eflect ion of wha t t ho common man in Amer ica was feel ing in 1775. Bu t it will never rank high as nn ex planat ion of Am erican character or ins titut i ons. In contras t to Pa i ne, Tocqueville 8eems t o have the uncanny abili ty to shed preconceived notions and impress ions of hio aristocratic past enabling him to give an accurate and • ...." rc9ptive Ilcc\'Iunt of demucnti c mores in the United S tates . ) I t is t h is ahillty of Tocq uev!.l1e t o oh~d hill .. ristocr atlc • ~ro u ndin po that adds to the un iq le ncsG a nd detachm en~ of his writin p'~ . Toeq'lovill c , more than r'lost poUtical \.. riters anr:! tr lnkc rn of the c i rhtccnt h a nd ninete enth centuries , ·... as a hle to p i ve a n ex~rno rd in n ri l y obj ect ive aeco lnt of 1CMocra tic in!:: t i tilt iono in Ar.H~ r i en. As Den,tnM in r' . ','ir i"'h t po in ts o'll , " '!'oc q'lcvlltc saw with 8r:'!a7.inp clarity , where othero !law h'lt ha7ilv i f a t a l l. thnt danoerney was on the 'NI\\' , that the hr oaden i np: 0 power and priviter a \'o'ns nn incvita t>le star e of IVlI'Ian evo l u tion." l For a f.urope a n a r istocr at t o make this forecRot r e qu ired a l a r ge mcasun~ o f detact,Ment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FEMA Guide to Continuity of Government for State, Local
    Guide to Continuity of Government For State, Local, Tribal and Territorial Governments July 2021 Guide to Continuity of Government for State, Local, Tribal and Territorial Governments This page intentionally left blank Guide to Continuity of Government for State, Local, Tribal and Territorial Governments Table of Contents 1. Introduction and Purpose .......................................................................................................... 2 2. Principals of COOP, COG and ECG ............................................................................................. 3 2.1. Relationship Between COOP and COG ........................................................................... 5 3. Continuity of Government – A Coordinated Effort .................................................................... 5 3.1. COG - Representation and Cross Governmental/Jurisdictional/ Organizational Continuity Working Group ............................................................................................... 5 3.2. Branches of Government (Federal Model) .................................................................... 6 3.3. SLTT Departments, Agencies and Bureaus ................................................................... 8 4. Emergency Action Steps ............................................................................................................ 9 4.1. Emergency Resources .................................................................................................. 10 Annex A: NEF 1 Description ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in the United States
    Democracy in the United States The United States is a representative democracy. This means that our government is elected by citizens. Here, citizens vote for their government officials. These officials represent the citizens’ ideas and concerns in government. Voting is one way to participate in our democracy. Citizens can also contact their officials when they want to support or change a law. Voting in an election and contacting our elected officials are two ways that Americans can participate in their democracy. Voting booth in Atascadero, California, in 2008. Photo by Ace Armstrong. Courtesy of the Polling Place Photo Project. Your Government and You H www.uscis.gov/citizenship 1 Becoming a U.S. Citizen Taking the Oath of Allegiance at a naturalization ceremony in Washington, D.C. Courtesy of USCIS. The process required to become a citizen is called naturalization. To become a U.S. citizen, you must meet legal requirements. You must complete an interview with a USCIS officer. You must also pass an English and Civics test. Then, you take the Oath of Allegiance. This means that you promise loyalty to the United States. When you become a U.S. citizen, you also make these promises: ★ give up loyalty to other countries ★ defend the Constitution and laws of the United States ★ obey the laws of the United States ★ serve in the U.S. military (if needed) ★ do important work for the nation (if needed) After you take the Oath of Allegiance, you are a U.S. citizen. 2 Your Government and You H www.uscis.gov/citizenship Rights and Responsibilities of Citizens Voting is one important right and responsibility of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance to Civil Government
    Resistance to Civil Government 1849 Henry David Thoreau 1817–1862 YogeBooks 2008:11:20:20:02:59 2 Æsthetic Papers Art X.—Resistance to Civil Government A Lecture delivered in 1847 3 4 Resistance to Civil Government heartily accept the motto,—“That government is best Iwhich governs least;” and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I believe,—“That government is best which governs not at all;” and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have. Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient. The objections which have been brought against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing government. The standing army is only an arm of the standing government. The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it. Witness the present Mexican war, the work of comparatively a few individuals using the standing government as their tool; for, in the outset, the people would not have consented to this measure. This American government,—what is it but a tradition, though a recent one, endeavoring to transmit itself unimpaired to posterity, but each instant losing some of its integrity? It has not the vitality and force of a single living man; for a single man can bend it to his will.
    [Show full text]
  • View That Government Should Interfere Minimally in the Economic Affairs of a Geographical Space and Leave the Decisions to Market Forces
    Vol: 1 Social Work Bulletin June, 2020 A Social Democratic Liberal Perspective on the Development of Education Policy (Reflections from the West) Amira Wali1 Dr Shazia Manzoor2 * Abstract Every developmental activity has a context, a historical background, enabling factors and political will. No policy develops in vacuum. It is pertinent to understand the economic situation of times in order to trace and contextualize the development of policies that were formed and the intentions of the governments behind formulation of such policies. The economic system is in a crisis for sure when unemployment soars high. Educational policies, with their many positive externalities, have also been developed in response to certain climates that were of urgent nature. This paper discusses the shift of thought related to employment situation from classical liberalism to social democratic liberalism, paving a way for the intervention of state authorities by assuming the role of welfare state and the consequent repercussions on the Education policy. The paper deliberates that such shifts and the proactiveness of government intervention is relevant in the present times of globalization, as well. 1. Introduction In order to understand the evolution of the economic thought, it is important to start from the start. The Classical liberalism thought had the basic assumptions of liberalism. These were essentially the free market, laisse faire, and the minimal interference of state for maximization of self interests. The basis of classical liberalism was the classical economic theory (Name invented by Marx). This theory was pioneered by Ricardo, Mills, Marshal, Edgeworth and Pigou. One would question the name- Why classical? The answer is that this theory comprised of an established body of doctrine which forms the core of analytical material presented in the principles of economics text books prior to 1947.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexis De Tocqueville Chronicler of the American Democratic Experiment
    Economic Insights FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS VOLUME 5, NUMBER 1 Alexis de Tocqueville Chronicler of the American Democratic Experiment The Early Years bring Tocqueville fame and honors. In Born in Paris in 1805, Alexis- 1833, about a year after Tocqueville We are pleased to add this piece on Charles-Henri Clérel de Tocqueville returned to France, the report on Alexis de Tocqueville to our series of profiles entered the world in the early and most American prisons, The U.S. Penitentiary powerful days of Napoleon’s empire. System and Its Application in France, that began with Frédéric Bastiat and Friedrich His parents were of the nobility and was published. von Hayek. Both Bastiat and Hayek were had taken the historical family name of Things in France changed for Beau- strong and influential proponents of indi- Tocqueville, which dated from the mont and Tocqueville upon their return early 17th century and was a region after 10 months in America. Both men vidual liberty and free enterprise. While they of France known previously as the left the judiciary. Beaumont was offi- approached those topics from a theoretical Leverrier fief. cially let go, and Tocqueville resigned perspective, Tocqueville’s views on early Tocqueville’s father supported the in sympathetic protest. Tocqueville then French monarchy and played no seri- had ample time to work on his master- American and French democracy were based ous role in public affairs until after piece, Democracy in America. Volume 1 on his keen personal observations and his- Napoleon’s final defeat at Waterloo, was published in 1835.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RISE of COMPETITIVE AUTHORITARIANISM Steven Levitsky and Lucan A
    Elections Without Democracy THE RISE OF COMPETITIVE AUTHORITARIANISM Steven Levitsky and Lucan A. Way Steven Levitsky is assistant professor of government and social studies at Harvard University. His Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America is forthcoming from Cambridge University Press. Lucan A. Way is assistant professor of political science at Temple University and an academy scholar at the Academy for International and Area Studies at Harvard University. He is currently writing a book on the obstacles to authoritarian consolidation in the former Soviet Union. The post–Cold War world has been marked by the proliferation of hy- brid political regimes. In different ways, and to varying degrees, polities across much of Africa (Ghana, Kenya, Mozambique, Zambia, Zimbab- we), postcommunist Eurasia (Albania, Croatia, Russia, Serbia, Ukraine), Asia (Malaysia, Taiwan), and Latin America (Haiti, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru) combined democratic rules with authoritarian governance during the 1990s. Scholars often treated these regimes as incomplete or transi- tional forms of democracy. Yet in many cases these expectations (or hopes) proved overly optimistic. Particularly in Africa and the former Soviet Union, many regimes have either remained hybrid or moved in an authoritarian direction. It may therefore be time to stop thinking of these cases in terms of transitions to democracy and to begin thinking about the specific types of regimes they actually are. In recent years, many scholars have pointed to the importance of hybrid regimes. Indeed, recent academic writings have produced a vari- ety of labels for mixed cases, including not only “hybrid regime” but also “semidemocracy,” “virtual democracy,” “electoral democracy,” “pseudodemocracy,” “illiberal democracy,” “semi-authoritarianism,” “soft authoritarianism,” “electoral authoritarianism,” and Freedom House’s “Partly Free.”1 Yet much of this literature suffers from two important weaknesses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uses of Alexis De Tocqueville's Writings in US Judicial Opinions
    Louisiana State University Law Center LSU Law Digital Commons Book Sections Faculty Scholarship 2008 A Man for All Reasons: The sesU of Alexis de Tocqueville's Writings in U.S. Judicial Opinions Christine Corcos Louisiana State University Law Center, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/book_sections Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Corcos, Christine, "A Man for All Reasons: The sU es of Alexis de Tocqueville's Writings in U.S. Judicial Opinions" (2008). Book Sections. 46. http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/book_sections/46 This Book Section is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at LSU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Book Sections by an authorized administrator of LSU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Man for All Reasons: The Uses of Alexis de Tocqueville’s Writing in U S. Judicial Opinions ∗ Christine A. Corcos Before Saul Litvinoff appeared on U. S. shores, another aristocratic comparativist, Alexis de Tocqueville, came to cast a critical yet affectionate eye on this republic. Since I am fond of both of these thinkers, I offer this overview of the judicial uses of the writings of the earlier scholar in appreciation of the later one. I. Introduction The United States has never been given to particular adoration of foreign observers of its mores, who quite often turn out to be critics rather than admirers. Nevertheless, one of its favorite visitors 1 since his one and only appearance on the scene in 1831-1832 2 is the 25-year-old magistrate Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859), sent by his government to study penal reform in the new republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of Democracy
    III The Concepts and Fundamental Principles of Democracy 3 The Overall Concept of Democracy 4 Popular Sovereignty 5 “The People” in a Democracy 6 Democracy and Equality 7 The Common Good 8 Majority Rule/Minority Rights 9 Democracy and Human Rights 10 Democracy and Representation 11 The Vocabulary of Politics: The Meaning of Common Terms 11 3 The Overall Concept of Democracy Democracy originated more than 2,400 years ago in ancient Greece. The word “democracy” means “rule by the people.” While this definition tells us that the citizens of a democracy govern their nation, it omits essential parts of the idea of democracy as practiced in countries around the world. The principal purposes for which the People establish democratic government are the protection and promotion of their rights, interests, and welfare. Democracy requires that each individual be free to participate in the political community’s self-government. Thus political freedom lies at the heart of the concept of democracy. The overall concept of modern democracy has three principal parts: “democracy,” “constitutional- ism,” and “liberalism.” Each must exist in a political system for it to be a genuine democracy. Democracy— Rule by the People through free and fair elections and other forms of participation ½ Popular sovereignty—the idea that the People are the ultimate authority and the source of the authority of government—is a fundamental principle of democracy. ½ The political equality of all citizens is an essential principle of democracy. ½ In a democracy, the just powers of government are based upon the consent of the governed. ½ Free elections and other forms of civic participation are essential to democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • In Praise of Liberalism: an Assessment of Liberal Political Thought from the 17Th Century to Today
    Review of Contemporary Philosophy Vol. 14, 2015, pp. 11–36, ISSN 1841-5261 IN PRAISE OF LIBERALISM: AN ASSESSMENT OF LIBERAL POLITICAL THOUGHT FROM THE 17TH CENTURY TO TODAY MICHAEL B. FRIEDMAN [email protected] School of Social Work, Columbia University ABSTRACT. The author of this essay maintains that liberalism has been the primary source of progressive change in the United States since its earliest history. To support his claim, he traces the philosophical and political history of liberalism in England and the United States. The specific forms of liberalism have varied in different periods of history; but, he maintains, there is an underlying spirit of liberalism that has persisted throughout the past 350 years and can be the source of dynamic progressive social change in the 21st century. Throughout history, he maintains, liberalism has been committed to social progress and has sought to improve the lives of populations that are economically and politically disadvantaged. This underlying spirit, the author argues, can be the source for an energized liberal agenda for the 21st century. Keywords: liberalism; political philosophy; political history 1. Introduction Conservative – and even centrist – opponents of liberalism reject it because they identify it with cumbersome government; reckless spending; high tax- ation; naiveté about economics, crime, and world power; and lack of moral values. What a mistake! In fact, liberalism has been the source of social and political progress in the Western world since the 17th century. The idea that rights set a limit on the legitimate power of government is a liberal idea. The idea that govern- ment must respect the liberty of individuals is a liberal idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Remarks on John Stuart Mill's Account of Tocqueville's
    SOME REMARKS ON JOHN STUART MILL’S ACCOUNT OF TOCQUEVILLE’S CONCERN WITH THE MASSES IN DEMOCRATIC SOCIETIES ÁTILA AMARAL BRILHANTE E FRANCISCO JOSÉ SALES ROCHA1 (UFC / Brasil) RESUMO Este artigo mostra que John Stuart Mill e Alexis de Tocqueville defenderam a existência de uma cultu- ra cívica capaz de contribuir para o florescimento da liberdade, da diversidade e impedir as massas de adquirirem um poder impossível de ser controlado. O argumento principal é que, no início da década de 1840, John Stuart Mill incorporou ao seu pensamento político a ideia de Alexis de Tocqueville de que, para que a democracia tenha um adequado funcionamento, o poder das massas deve ser contraba- lançado. Inicialmente, John Stuart Mill tentou encontrar um poder na sociedade para contrabalançar o poder das massas, mas depois ele passou a defender um novo formato para as instituições com o obje- tivo de garantir a presença das minorias educadas no parlamento e, por meio disto, estabelecer o con- fronto de ideias que ele julgava tão necessário para prevenir a tirania das massas. No intento de evitar os excessos da democracia, John Stuart Mill deu maior importância à construção das instituições polí- ticas, enquanto Alexis de Tocqueville enfatizou mais o papel da participação na política local. Apesar disto, a dívida do primeiro para com o pensamento político do segundo é imensa. Palavras-chave: O poder das massas. Controlabilidade. Democracia. J. S. Mill. A. de Tocqueville. ABSTRACT This article shows that both J. S. Mill and Tocqueville favoured a civic culture that supported liberty, diversity and prevented the uncontrolled power of the masses.
    [Show full text]
  • “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau
    Name:______________________________________________ Date:____________________________ Period:________ “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau Preview: In this classic essay, Thoreau describes the highest duty of good citizens. They must do what they think is right, even at the cost of going to jail. Written more than a century ago, this essay still stirs the mind and the heart. Thoreau’s message inspired Martin Luther King, Jr. who led the civil rights crusade in the 1950s and 1960s. Read the “Build Background” and “Focus your Reading” sections on page 369. Passage 1: Lines 1-24 (pages 370-371) Focus: Thoreau begins his essay by explaining his views on government. Read to find out whether he favors more government or less government. 1. Thoreau favors MORE – LESS government. (Circle the correct choice and mark out the incorrect choice.) 2. List two details from the text that support your choice. 3. A standing government is one that stays in power over time. Which phrase below is true to Thoreau’s views about such a government? A standing government _____________________________. A. Always reflects the people’s will B. governs little or not at all C. can be a tool of dishonest citizens. Passage 2: Lines 25-64 (pages 371-372) Focus: Thoreau wanted to limit the power of the majority so that individuals could follow their conscience. Read to find out why the individual conscience is so important to him. 4. Which phrase below BEST completes the following sentence: According to Thoreau, his highest duty as a citizen is to ____________________. A. follow the majority rule B.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Principles of Socialism and Capitalism for Addressing Poverty by Matthew Kaiser
    Economic Principles of Socialism and Capitalism for Addressing Poverty By Matthew Kaiser Throughout life many people will never experience extreme poverty, or for that matter poverty at all. There could be many reasons for this, such as being born in a place with low poverty rates or being born into families who are affluent. Regardless of the reasons people will not experience poverty, there are people who cannot seem to escape from poverty. According to the United Nations, around ten percent of the world’s population is living in extreme poverty and struggles to fulfill the most basic human needs (United Nations, n.d.). Why is extreme poverty still a problem in a world immensely more developed than in the past? Would capitalism address poverty more efficiently and better than socialism? To answer these questions there must be an understanding of the definition of poverty, classifications of the different economies, and the characteristics of socialism and capitalism. When one thinks about poverty, one may assume that poverty just entails a lack of financial stability. People who lack income and stability will experience the effects of poverty more than those who do not. However, extreme poverty includes many variables such as hunger, malnutrition, limited access to education, social discrimination, exclusion, and poor living conditions. When these things fester together and economies fail to fix these issues, the result is extreme poverty and poor qualities of life. Though poverty can be found in most places in the world, most extreme poverty is found in developing economies. There are three broad classifications countries can be placed into: developed economies, economies in transition, and developing economies.
    [Show full text]