DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary of Data on Chemical Quality of Streams of North Carolina, 1943-67

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary of Data on Chemical Quality of Streams of North Carolina, 1943-67 Summary of Data on Chemical Quality of Streams of North Carolina, 1943-67 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1895-B Prepared in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Heater and Air Resources Summary of Data on Chemical Quality of Streams of North Carolina, 1943-67 By HUGH B. WILDER and LARRY J. SLACK QUALITY OF SURFACE WATERS OF NORTH CAROLINA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 189S-B Prepared in cooperation with the North Carolina Department of Water and Air Resources u. «. te. s. WATER RESOURCES DIVISION ROLL A. MO. RECEIVED APR 14 1971 AM UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WALTER J. HICKEL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog card No. 70-609121 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract .............................................................................................................. Bl Introduction .................................................................... ... ... ... 1 Methods of investigation ............................................................. ........ 4 Reporting units .......................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgments ..._......................................................................... ....... 6 Significance and occurrence of each constituent ........................................ 6 Silica (SiO.) ................................................................................................ 6 Iron (Fe) .................................................................................................... 6 Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) .................................................... 6 Sodium (Na) .............................................................................................. 7 Potassium (K) .......................................................................................... 7 Bicarbonate (HCO8) ................................................................................ 7 Sulfate (SO*) .............................................................................................. 8 Chloride (Cl) .............................................................................................. 8 Flubrjde (F) .............................................................................................. 8 Nitrate (NO.) ............................................................................................ 8 Phosphate (PO*) ........................................................................................ 8 Dissolved solids .......................................................................................... 9 Specific conductance (micromhos) ........................................................ 9 Hardness ...................................................................................................... 9 pH .................................................................................................................. 10 Color .............................................................................................................. 10 Explanation of tabular data .......................................................................... 11 Table 2 ........................................................................................................ 11 Table 3 ........................................................................................................ 12 Table 4 ........................................................................................................ 13 Table 5 ........................................................................................................ 13 Table 6 ........................................................................................................ 14 ILLUSTRATIONS PLATE 1. Map showing location of stations in North Carolina at which more than one sample was collected for chemical analyses .............................................................................. In pocket 2. Map showing location of sites in North Carolina at which only one sample was collected for chemical analysis .............................................................................. In pocket TABLES Page TABLE 1. Historical summary of cooperative quality-of-water in­ vestigations made by the U.S. Geological Survey in North Carolina ........................................................................ B3 2. Description of stations at which more than one sample was collected for chemical analyses .................................... 16 3. Summary of chemical analyses at daily and monthly sampling stations .................................................................. 102 in IV CONTENTS Page TABLE 4. Summary of chemical analyses of water from miscellane­ ous and occasional sampling stations at which two or more samples were collected ................................................ B120 5. Description of sites at which only one sample was col­ lected for chemical analysis ................................................ 154 6. Chemical analyses of water from sites at which only one sample was collected ............................................................ 216 QUALITY OF SURFACE WATERS OF NORTH CAROLINA SUMMARY OF DATA ON CHEMICAL QUALITY OF STREAMS IN NORTH CAROLINA, 1943-67 By HUGH B. WILDER and LARRY J. SLACK ABSTRACT This report summarizes water-quality data collected by the U.S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the State of North Carolina during the period 1943-67. Maximum, minimum, and average values are shown for complete analyses of mineral con­ stituents dissolved in water from 177 locations at which samples were collected daily or monthly for at least 1 consecutive year. Maximum and minimum values are given for 460 "miscellaneous and occasional stations" at which two or more chemical analyses were made. Single analyses are shown for 580 additional sampling sites. A total of about 19,000 analyses were used in determining statistical values included in the report. Water in streams of North Carolina is generally of good mineral quality and is acceptable with a minimum amount of treatment for most uses. INTRODUCTION Knowledge of the chemical and physical character of the waters of North Carolina is important for intelligent industrial and mu­ nicipal planning and development. North Carolina's surface waters are generally of good mineral quality, and are acceptable, with a minimum of treatment, for public water supply, industry, irriga­ tion, fish and wildlife, and recreational activities. The collection and publication of basic data on the chemical and physical quality of North Carolina surface waters was started as a joint effort in 1943 by the U.S. Geological Survey and the State of North Carolina. This program was continued through September 1967, at which time it was superseded by a more Bl B2 QUALITY OF SURFACE WATERS OF NORTH CAROLINA specialized program designed to obtain supporting data for the State's pollution monitoring activities. Reports containing the basic data collected under this program have been published an­ nually to meet the current needs of users of water-quality data. Table 1 gives information on these annual reports, including the State department and division cooperating in the program, bulletin number, volume number, and title of the reports. Other information concerning the chemical quality of waters in North Carolina may be found in the following publications: Chemical and Physical Character of Municipal Water Supplies in North Carolina, Bull. 2. (Available from Director, N.C. Department of Water and Air Resources, P.O. Box 9392, Raleigh, N.C. 27603.) Gambell, A. W., and Fisher, D. W., Chemical Composition of Rainfall, Eastern North Carolina and Southeastern Virginia; U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 1535-K. (For sale by Superintendent of Docu­ ments, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. Price 65 cents.) Fisher, D. W., Annual Variations in Chemical Composition of Atmos­ pheric Precipitation, Eastern North Carolina and Southeastern Vir­ ginia; U.S. Geol. Survey Water-Supply Paper 1535-M. (For sale by Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Wash­ ington, D.C. 20402. Price 15 cents.) Data on the chemical quality of ground-water are contained in a series of reports on areal ground-water investigations. These are available from the Director, N.C. Department of Water and Air Resources, P.O. Box 9392, Raleigh, N.C. 27603. SUMMARY OF DATA ON CHEMICAL QUALITY OP STREAMS B3 TABLE 1. Historical summary of cooperative quality-of-water investigations by the U.S. Geological Survey in North Carolina Code Cooperating agencies: A. North Carolina Department of Conservation and De­ velopment; Division of Water Resources and En­ gineering B. North Carolina Department of Conservation and De­ Publications velopment; Division of Water Water Resources, Inlets year agency Title Volume and Coastal Waterways 1944............ A E 1944 C. North Carolina Department 1945............ A E 1 of Water Resources; Di­ 1946............ A E 2 vision of Stream Sanita­ 1947............ A E 3 tion and Hydrology 1948............ A E 4 D. North Carolina Department 1949............ A E 5 of Water and Air 1950............ A E 6 Resources, Division of 1951............ A E 7 Stream Sanitation and 1952............ B E 8 Hydrology 1953............ B F 9 Publication titles
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 15A Ncac 02B .0100-.0300
    NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Division of Water Resources Administrative Code Section: 15A NCAC 02B .0100: Procedures for Assignment of Water Quality Standards 15A NCAC 02B .0200: Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina 15A NCAC 02B .0300: Assignment of Stream Classifications Amended Effective: November 1, 2019 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA This document available at: https://files.nc.gov/ncdeq/csrrb/tri_rev_17to19/15A_NCAC_02B_.0100- .0300.pdf SUBCHAPTER 02B - SURFACE WATER AND WETLAND STANDARDS SECTION .0100 - PROCEDURES FOR ASSIGNMENT OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS 15A NCAC 02B .0101 GENERAL PROCEDURES (a) The rules contained in Sections .0100, .0200 and .0300 of this Subchapter, which pertain to the series of classifications and water quality standards, shall be known as the "Classifications and Water Quality Standards Applicable to the Surface Waters and Wetlands of North Carolina." (b) The Environmental Management Commission (hereinafter referred to as the Commission), prior to classifying and assigning standards of water quality to any waters of the State, shall proceed as follows: (1) The Commission, or its designee, shall determine waters to be studied for the purpose of classification and assignment of water quality standards on the basis of user requests, petitions, or the identification of existing or attainable water uses, as defined by Rule .0202 of this Subchapter, not presently included in the water classification. (2) In determining the best usage of waters and assigning classifications of such waters, the Commission shall consider the criteria specified in G.S. 143-214.1(d). In determining whether to revise a designated best usage for waters through a revision to the classifications, the Commission shall follow the requirements of 40 CFR 131.10 which is incorporated by reference including subsequent amendments and editions.
    [Show full text]
  • PROPOSED RULES Environmental Quality, Department of Wildlife Resources Commission
    NORTH CAROLINA REGISTER VOLUME 33 ● ISSUE 11 ● Pages 1103 – 1266 December 3, 2018 I. EXECUTIVE ORDERS Executive Order No. 80 .................................................................................. 1103 – 1106 Executive Order No. 81 .................................................................................. 1107 II. IN ADDITION Labor, Department of - Notice Of Verbatim Adoption Of Federal Standards 1108 III. PROPOSED RULES Environmental Quality, Department of Wildlife Resources Commission ..................................................................... 1109 – 1147 Public Health, Commission for ....................................................................... 1147 – 1180 Occupational Licensing Boards and Commissions Barber Examiners, Board of ........................................................................... 1180 – 1181 Landscape Contractors' Licensing Board ........................................................ 1181 – 1186 IV. APPROVED RULES........................................................................................ 1187 – 1253 Elections and Ethics Enforcement, Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement, Board of Labor, Department of Department Public Safety, Department of Department Environmental Quality, Department of Wildlife Resources Commission Public Health, Commission for Occupational Licensing Boards and Commissions Dental Examiners, Board of Locksmith Licensing Board Midwifery Joint Committee Physical Therapy Examiners, Board of V. RULES REVIEW COMMISSION ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tourism Asset Inventory
    Asset Asset Management Overview Natural/Scenic Asset Details Cultural/Historic Asset Details Event Asset Details Type: Brief Description Potential Market Draw: Access: Uses: Ownership Supporting Critical Asset is Key Tourism Opportunities are Land Visitor Use Management Interpretation Ranger at Site Visitor Potential Land Protection Species Represents the Type of Cultural Representation has Promotion of event Attendance of Event Event results Event has a NGOs Management marketed through Impact Indicators provided to businesses, Management Policy or Plan Plans Included at Site Facilities at Hazards Status Protection cultural heritage of the Heritage Represented: the support of a is primarily: event is Duration: in increased specific Natural, Cultural, Day Visit, Overnight, 1 = difficult Hiking, Biking, Issues Destination are Being visitors, and community Plan in Place Stakeholder Site Status region diverse group of primarily: overnight marketing Historic, Scenic, Extended 5 = easy Paddling, Marketing Monitored on a members to donate Input Tangible, Intangible, stakeholders Locally, Regionally, One Day, stays in strategy and Event, Educational, Interpretation, Organization / Regular Basis time, money, and/or Both Nationally, Locally, Multiple Days destination economic Informational etc. TDA and Reported to other resources for Internationally, All Regionally, impact TDA asset protection Nationally, indicators Internationally, All Pisgah National Forest Natural Established in 1916 and one of the first national Day Visit, Overnight, 5; PNF in Hiking, Biking, U.S. Federal Pisgah Overcrowding Yes Yes, in multiple ways Nantahalla and y,n - name, year Yes; National At various placs at various At various Any hazard Federally protected See Forest forests in the eastern U.S., Pisgah stretches across Extended Transylvania Rock Climbing, Government Conservancy, at some popular through multiple Pisgah forest Forest listed below locations below locations below associated with public lands for Management several western North Carolina counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Yadkin River Huc 03040201
    BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT UNIT BASINWIDE ASSESSMENT REPORT SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section November 2010 This page was intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAM METHODS .............................................................................................. 4 BASIN DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................. 4 SAVANNAH RIVER HU 03060101 – SENECA RIVER ................................................................................ 6 River and Stream Assessment .............................................................................................................. 6 Special Studies ...................................................................................................................................... 7 SAVANNAH RIVER HU 03060102 – TUGALOO RIVER ............................................................................. 8 River and Stream Assessment .............................................................................................................. 8 GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................................ 10 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix Page B-1. Summary of benthic macroinvertebrate data, sampling methods and criteria. ................................12 S-1. Benthic site
    [Show full text]
  • Information on the NCWRC's Scientific Council of Fishes Rare
    A Summary of the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina Submitted by Bryn H. Tracy North Carolina Division of Water Resources North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Raleigh, NC On behalf of the NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes November 01, 2014 Bigeye Jumprock, Scartomyzon (Moxostoma) ariommum, State Threatened Photograph by Noel Burkhead and Robert Jenkins, courtesy of the Virginia Division of Game and Inland Fisheries and the Southeastern Fishes Council (http://www.sefishescouncil.org/). Table of Contents Page Introduction......................................................................................................................................... 3 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes In North Carolina ........... 4 Summaries from the 2010 Reevaluation of Status Listings for Jeopardized Freshwater Fishes in North Carolina .......................................................................................................................... 12 Recent Activities of NCWRC’s Scientific Council of Fishes .................................................. 13 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part I, Ohio Lamprey .............................................. 14 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part II, “Atlantic” Highfin Carpsucker ...................... 17 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part III, Tennessee Darter ...................................... 20 North Carolina’s Imperiled Fish Fauna, Part
    [Show full text]
  • Jurisdiction Route Name Crossing Type Year Built
    Year Deck Super Sub Culvert Func Struc Last Structure Structure Avg Daily Road Jurisdiction Route Name Crossing Type Built Cond Cond Cond Cond Obslt Defic Inspected Length (FT) Width (FT) Traffic System Henry County Parkway Drive 1714 220 Bypass Bridge 1983 7 7 7 N 8/23/2018 198.2 33.8 720 Secondary Henry County Kings Mtn Rd 174 Little Beaver Creek Culvert 1990 N N N 6 1/9/2019 32.0 115.0 14480 Primary Henry County Old Liberty Road 620 Leatherwood Creek Bridge 1964 6 7 7 N 12/4/2017 99.7 29.0 1995 Secondary Henry County Daniels Crk Rd 609 Daniels Creek Bridge 1962 6 6 6 N 10/30/2017 23.0 37.9 4827 Secondary Henry County Irisburg Road 650 Leatherwood Creek Bridge 1955 7 6 7 N FO 3/7/2019 133.5 25.9 1391 Secondary Henry County 58 Bypass WBL NS Railway Bridge 1990 7 7 7 N 2/19/2019 133.0 49.8 5476 Primary Henry County Camilla Dr 1270 Little Reed Creek Culvert 1989 N N N 6 1/23/2019 43.0 32.0 128 Secondary Henry County Joseph Martin Hwy Br. of Marrowbone Creek Culvert 1932 N N N 9 12/21/2015 13.2 59.0 1956 Secondary Henry County DILLONS FORK RD609 RTE 220 Bridge 1976 6 7 6 N 1/15/2018 200.1 38.1 6136 Secondary Henry County Eliza Reamy Av1110 Daniels Creek Culvert 1972 N N N 6 11/12/2015 12.1 70.0 329 Secondary Henry County 220 Bus Main St.
    [Show full text]
  • Milebymile.Com Personal Road Trip Guide North Carolina Byway Highway # "Waterfall Byway"
    MileByMile.com Personal Road Trip Guide North Carolina Byway Highway # "Waterfall Byway" Miles ITEM SUMMARY 0.0 Start of Waterfall Byway Byway starts at the juction of United States Highway #64 with State Highway #215 at Rosman, North Carolina. This byway passes through lands full of scenic wonder and historical significance. Bridal Veil Falls has a spectacular 120-foot cascade into the Cullasaja River. Nearby Dry Falls derives its name from the fact that visitors can walk behind the falls without getting wet. Byway towns such as Gneiss and Murphy are important landmarks about North Carolina's Native American history. 1.1 Old Toxaway Road / State Old Toxaway Road / State Route #1139, Frozen Lake, Fouth Falls, Route #1139 Upper Whitewwater Falls, Lake Jocassee, The Wilds Christian Association, a Protestant Christian organization, located here in North Carolina 2.6 Silverstein Road Silverstain Road / State Route #1309, Quebec, North Carolina, 3.7 Flat Creek Valley Road Flat Creek Valley Road / State Route #1147, 3.8 Oak Grove Church Road 5.3 Flat Creek Valley Road Flat Creek Valley Road / State Route #1147, Toxaway River, 5.4 Indian Creek Trail Road Indian Creek Trail Road, Falls Country Club, 6.8 Lake Toxaway, North Junction State Highway #281, Lake Toxaway, a community in Carolina Transylvania County, North Carolina, Tanasee Creek Reservoir, Wolf Mountain, North Carolina, Wolf Creek Reservoir, 7.3 Toxaway Fall Drive Toxaway Fall Drive, Lake Toxaway Spillway, Toxaway Lake, the largest man-made , privately held Lake in North Carolina. This is fed by natureal streams and flows out to make Toxaway Falls and on to Toxaway River.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Executive Summary During its fifth full year of operations in fiscal year 2007-08, the N.C. Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) took on new challenges and continued to register fresh successes in meeting its goals of improving North Carolina’s environment while facilitating responsible economic growth for the state and its residents. EEP continued to collaborate with federal, state and local governments, contractors and willing landowners to provide goods and services, basing its work on a solid foundation of watershed plan- ning that goes beyond mere environmental permitting and compliance. The initiative also extended its record of carrying out its mission without a single transportation-project delay due to the lack of mitigation, helping to move forward more than $4.8 billion in transportation-infrastructure im- provements since becoming operational in 2003. Key developments in FY 2007-08 included: • Responding to changes to federal rules guiding aquatic-resource mitigation. Under the leadership of the Governor’s office, N.C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) and EEP petitioned the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, the U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in late 2007 to promote in- lieu fee programs such as EEP as a method to providing third-party mitigation for public- and pri- vate-sector development. The new rule, which became effective in June of 2008, gave recognition to EEP’s unique national status and maintained ILFs as a viable option. The rule will require EEP to make operational adjustments and the details of these changes are being evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Watershed Action Plan for the Lockwood Folly River Brunswick County, NC
    Development of a Watershed Action Plan for the Lockwood Folly River Brunswick County, NC Lynnette Batt Dr. Norman Christensen, Advisor Todd Miller, Co-advisor May 2008 Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree at the Nicholas School of the Environment and Earth Sciences of Duke University 2008 Preface Increasing urban and residential growth poses one of the greatest threats to water quality and aquatic resources on the North Carolina coast. Brunswick County recently ranked as the 14 th fastest growing county in the U.S., growing by over 200% between 1970 and 2000. The Lockwood Folly River watershed, located within Brunswick County, faces significant water quality issues associated with this growth and development. High levels of fecal coliform now result in 60% closure of the river to shellfish harvest, up from 18% in 1980. Future rapid increases in residential development will further degrade water quality if management is not improved. Average developed area by subwatershed is expected to increase from 6% in 2004 to 64% in 2030, leading to a projected 3.5-fold increase in fecal coliform loading (Stantec 2007). These figures suggest current regulations in the watershed are not enough to protect water quality, and a more comprehensive approach is needed. Watershed management planning at the local level has become an important tool for balancing growth and environmental concerns. In 2005 the North Carolina Coastal Federation and Brunswick County received a U.S. EPA grant to undertake growth management and watershed planning for the Lockwood Folly River. At the same time, North Carolina’s Ecosystem Enhancement Program worked to develop a Local Watershed Plan focused on stream and wetland restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly of North Carolina Session 1991 S 2
    GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1991 S 2 SENATE BILL 151 Environment and Natural Resources Committee Substitute Adopted 5/14/91 Short Title: Protect Natural/Scenic Rivers. (Public) ─────────────────────────────────────── Sponsors: ─────────────────────────────────────── Referred to: ─────────────────────────────────────── February 20, 1991 1 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 2 AN ACT TO STRENGTHEN THE NATURAL AND SCENIC RIVERS SYSTEM 3 AND TO REQUIRE ZONING AND OTHER LAND-USE CONTROLS TO 4 PROTECT DESIGNATED RIVERS. 5 The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: 6 Section 1. G.S. 113A-32 reads as rewritten: 7 "§ 113A-32. Declaration of purpose. 8 The purpose of this Article is to implement the policy as set out in G.S. 113A-31 by 9 instituting a North Carolina natural and scenic rivers system, Natural and Scenic Rivers 10 System, and by prescribing methods for inclusion of components to the system System 11 from time to time." 12 Sec. 2. G.S. 113A-33 reads as rewritten: 13 "§ 113A-33. Definitions. 14 As used in this Article, unless the context requires otherwise: 15 (1) ‘Component' means any river or segment approved by the General 16 Assembly for inclusion in the System. 17 (1)(2) ‘Department' means the Department of Environment, Health, and 18 Natural Resources. 19 (2)(3) ‘Free-flowing,' as applied to any river or section of a river, segment, 20 means existing or flowing in natural condition without substantial 21 impoundment, diversion, straightening, rip-rapping, or other 22 modification of the waterway. The existence of low dams, diversion 23 works, and other minor structures at the time any river is proposed for GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA 1991 1 inclusion in the North Carolina natural and scenic rivers system System 2 shall not automatically bar its consideration for such inclusion: 3 Provided, inclusion, provided that this shall not be construed to 4 authorize, intend, or encourage future construction of such structures 5 within components of the system.
    [Show full text]
  • List of North Carolina Bridges
    3/31/21 Division County Number DOT # Route Across Year Built Posted SV Posted TTST 7 Alamance 2 000002 SR1529 PRONG OF HAW RIVER 1998 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 3 000003 SR1529 DRY CREEK 1954 20 29 7 Alamance 6 000006 SR1504 TRAVIS CREEK 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 7 000007 SR1504 TICKLE CREEK 2009 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 11 000011 NC54 HAW RIVER 2001 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 12 000012 NC62 BIG ALAMANCE CREEK 1999 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 13 000013 SR1530 HAW RIVER 2002 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 14 000014 NC87 CANE CREEK 1929 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 15 000015 SR1530 HAW RIVER 1957 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 16 000016 NC119 I40, I85 1994 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 18 000018 SR1561 HAW RIVER 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 22 000022 SR1001 MINE CREEK 1951 23 30 7 Alamance 23 000023 SR1001 STONEY CREEK 1991 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 24 000024 SR1581 STONY CREEK 1960 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 26 000026 NC62 GUNN CREEK 1949 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 27 000027 SR1002 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2004 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 28 000028 SR1587 BUTTERMILK CREEK 1986 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 31 000031 SR1584 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2005 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 32 000032 SR1582 BUTTERMILK CREEK 2012 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 33 000033 NC49 STINKING QUARTER CREEK 1980 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 34 000034 NC54 BACK CREEK 1973 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 35 000035 NC62 HAW RIVER 1958 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 36 000036 SR1613 TOM'S CREEK 1960 35 41 7 Alamance 37 000037 SR1611 PRONG STONEY CREEK 2013 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 38 000038 SR1611 STONEY CREEK 1960 33 39 7 Alamance 39 000039 SR1584 PRONG BUTTERMILK CREEK 1995 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 40 000040 NC87 BRANCH OF VARNALS CREEK 1929 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 41 000041 SR1002 STONEY CREEK 1960 34 37 7 Alamance 42 000042 SR1002 TOM'S CREEK 1960 34 38 7 Alamance 43 000043 SR1763 JORDAN CREEK 1995 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 44 000044 SR1768 JORDAN'S CREEK 1968 5 0 7 Alamance 45 000045 SR1002 JORDAN CREEK 2008 LGW LGW 7 Alamance 47 000047 SR1226 I40, I85 2004 LGW LGW This report includes NC Bridges that are less than 20' in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Repositories
    NOTE TO USER Future revisions to this FIRM Index will only be issued to Communities that are located on FIRM panels being revised. This FIRM Index therefore remains valid for FIRM panels dated August 18, 2009 or earlier. Please refer to the “MOST RECENT FIRM PANEL DATE” MAP NUMBER column in the LISTING OF COMMUNITIES table to determine the most recent FIRM Index date for each community. MAP DATES COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA This FIRM Index displays the map date for each FIRM panel at the time that this Index was printed. Because this Index may not be distributed to unaffected communities in subsequent revisions, users may determine the current map date for each FIRM panel by visiting the FEMA Map Service Center website at http://www.msc.fema.gov, or by calling the Map < Service Center at 1-800-358-9616. 3711404200J **3711406200J 3711408200J 3711504200J Communities annexing land on adjacent FIRM panels must obtain a current copy of the 08/18/09 08/18/09 adjacent panel as well as the current FIRM Index. These may be ordered directly from the 08/18/09 Ararat River Map Service Center at the number listed above. F i 3711500200J s h 3711501200J e 08/18/09 < 18 r 08/18/09 **3711403200J 3711502200J 3711503200J < **3711506200J **3711507200J P R < i v Brushy Fork 08/18/09 e L 08/18/09 r o v Ararat River Tributary 9 il ls 89 < C P S r Brushy Fork Tributary 1 e < te e w k a T r u Johnson Creek ts m C bl r in e g e 3711500100J R k o 103 ck A 08/18/09 B r P a B 3711501100J r 3711502100JT 3711503100J a r n r a e i n c b t 08/18/09 h 08/18/09 08/18/09 77
    [Show full text]