Evaluating the Patient with Suspected Radiculopathy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluating the Patient with Suspected Radiculopathy EVALUATINGEVALUATING THETHE PATIENTPATIENT WITHWITH SUSPECTEDSUSPECTED RADICULOPATHYRADICULOPATHY Timothy R. Dillingham, M.D., M.S Professor and Chair, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation The Medical College of Wisconsin. RadiculopathiesRadiculopathies PathophysiologicalPathophysiological processesprocesses affectingaffecting thethe nervenerve rootsroots VeryVery commoncommon reasonreason forfor EDXEDX referralreferral CAUSESCAUSES OFOF RADICULOPATHYRADICULOPATHY HNPHNP RadiculiitisRadiculiitis SpinalSpinal StenosisStenosis SpondylolisthesisSpondylolisthesis InfectionInfection TumorTumor FacetFacet SynovialSynovial CystCyst Diseases:Diseases: Diabetes,Diabetes, AIDPAIDP MUSCULOSKELETALMUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERSDISORDERS :: UPPERUPPER LIMBLIMB ShoulderShoulder BursitisBursitis LateralLateral EpicondylitisEpicondylitis DequervainsDequervains TriggerTrigger fingerfinger FibrositisFibrositis FibromyalgiaFibromyalgia // regionalregional painpain syndromesyndrome NEUROLOGICALNEUROLOGICAL CONDITIONSCONDITIONS MIMICKINGMIMICKING CERVICALCERVICAL RADICULOPATHYRADICULOPATHY Entrapment/CompressionEntrapment/Compression neuropathiesneuropathies –– Median,Median, Radial,Radial, andand UlnarUlnar BrachialBrachial NeuritisNeuritis MultifocalMultifocal MotorMotor NeuropathyNeuropathy NeedNeed ExtensiveExtensive EDXEDX studystudy toto R/OR/O otherother conditionsconditions MUSCULOSKELETALMUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERSDISORDERS :: LOWERLOWER LIMBLIMB HipHip arthritisarthritis TrochantericTrochanteric BursitisBursitis IlliotibialIlliotibial BandBand SyndromeSyndrome PatellofemoralPatellofemoral PainPain PesPes AnserinusAnserinus BursitisBursitis BakersBakers CystCyst PlantarPlantar FasciitisFasciitis MortonsMortons NeuromaNeuroma NEUROLOGICALNEUROLOGICAL CONDITIONSCONDITIONS MIMICKINGMIMICKING LSRLSR DiabeticDiabetic AmyotrophyAmyotrophy MononeuropathiesMononeuropathies –– FemoralFemoral –– TibialTibial –– CommonCommon PeronealPeroneal NeedNeed ExtensiveExtensive EDXEDX studystudy AnatomyAnatomy ANATOMYANATOMY ANDAND IMPLICATIONSIMPLICATIONS SensorySensory (DRG)(DRG) inin thethe intervertebralintervertebral foramen,foramen, sparedspared withwith radiculopathiesradiculopathies PLL;PLL; predisposespredisposes toto posterolateralposterolateral HNPHNP CaudaCauda EquinaEquina –– SpinalSpinal cordcord endsends atat T11T11--L1L1 –– NerveNerve rootsroots extendingextending toto intervertebralintervertebral foramenforamen –– LesionLesion fromfrom T12T12 toto SacrumSacrum cancan produceproduce samesame EMGEMG findingsfindings MustMust knowknow brachialbrachial andand LL--SS plexusplexus andand musclemuscle innervationsinnervations Cauda Equina HistoryHistory andand PhysicalPhysical ExaminationExamination PHYSICALPHYSICAL EXAMEXAM FocusedFocused NeuromuscularNeuromuscular –– AffectedAffected limblimb andand contralateralcontralateral –– IfIf NeckNeck symptomssymptoms--lowerlower limbslimbs toto looklook forfor myelopathymyelopathy –– CranialCranial nervesnerves-- ?CVA,?CVA, MG,MG, AIDPAIDP ReducedReduced ReflexesReflexes withwith AcuteAcute SpinalSpinal ShockShock ALGORITHMICALGORITHMIC APPROACHAPPROACH SymptomsSymptoms –– GeneralizedGeneralized (2(2 oror moremore limbs)limbs) –– FocalFocal (single(single limb)limb) SignsSigns –– SensorySensory lossloss –– WeaknessWeakness –– ReflexesReflexes NotNot perfectperfect taxonomytaxonomy-- RadicsRadics andand EntrapmentsEntrapments Patient Presentation (Pain, Weakness, Gait disturbance, Sensory Symptoms, Paresthesias) No sensory loss on Exam Sensory loss on Exam Generalized Focal Symptoms Generalized Focal Symptoms Symptoms Symptoms (With Weakness) –MMN Reduced Reflexes –Entrapment –Radiculopathy –Polyneuropathy –Radiculopathy –Entrapment Neuropathy –Bilateral CR –Mononeuropathy –Plexopathy –Bilateral LSR –Motor Neuron –Musculoskelatal disorder –Mononeuropathy –Cauda equina Syndr. Disease –Myofascial pain syndrome –Myopathy –Neuromuscular Junction Disorder Increased Reflexes –Cervical Myelopathy Generalized Symptoms –Thoracic Myelopahty (No Weakness) –Multiple Sclerosis –Fibrositis –Other Myelopathies –Polymyalgia Rheumatica SymptomsSymptoms andand EDXEDX StudyStudy OutcomeOutcome forfor UpperUpper LimbLimb andand LowerLower LimbLimb StudiesStudies Lauder et al 2000 AJPMR SymptomsSymptoms hadhad lowlow sensitivitiessensitivities LowLow specificitiesspecificities NonNon--significantsignificant OddsOdds RatiosRatios PHYSICALPHYSICAL EXAMEXAM FINDINGSFINDINGS Weakness,Weakness, reflexreflex change,change, oror sensorysensory lossloss inin thethe legleg –– 33--66 timestimes thethe probabilityprobability ofof havinghaving aa positivepositive studystudy ((Lauder et al, 2000 AJPMR) – 3-14 times the probability of having an electrodiagnostically confirmed radiculopathy (Lauder et al, 2000 AJPMR) PHYSICALPHYSICAL EXAMEXAM FINDINGSFINDINGS Weakness,Weakness, reflexreflex change,change, oror sensorysensory lossloss inin thethe armarm –– 44--55 timestimes thethe probabilityprobability ofof havinghaving aa positivepositive studystudy ((Lauder et al, 2000 Arch PMR) – 2-9 times the probability of having an electrodiagnostically confirmed CR (Lauder et al, 2000 Arch PMR) ElectrodiagnosisElectrodiagnosis ElectrodiagnosticElectrodiagnostic StudiesStudies NerveNerve ConductionConduction StudiesStudies SSEPsSSEPs FF waveswaves andand HH reflexesreflexes EMGEMG AAEMAAEM GUIDELINESGUIDELINES 19991999 MuscleMuscle andand NerveNerve ExamineExamine musclesmuscles representingrepresenting allall myotomesmyotomes PSMPSM localizelocalize lesionlesion toto rootroot levellevel OneOne motormotor andand oneone sensorysensory NCSNCS ELECTRODIAGNOSTICELECTRODIAGNOSTIC TESTINGTESTING PerformPerform thethe basicbasic teststests relatedrelated toto suspectedsuspected conditioncondition AdjustAdjust andand modifymodify studystudy asas datadata areare acquiredacquired MayMay needneed serialserial studiesstudies LowLow thresholdthreshold toto studystudy contralateralcontralateral limblimb oror upperupper (lower)(lower) limblimb USEFULLNESSUSEFULLNESS OFOF ELECTRODIAGNOSISELECTRODIAGNOSIS ConfirmConfirm clinicalclinical suspicionsuspicion RaiseRaise otherother unsuspectedunsuspected diagnosticdiagnostic possibilitiespossibilities ExcludeExclude entitiesentities onon thethe differentialdifferential diagnosisdiagnosis IdentifyIdentify regionregion toto imageimage TailorsTailors otherother diagnosticdiagnostic testingtesting NerveNerve ConductionConduction StudiesStudies SensorySensory NCSNCS shouldshould bebe normalnormal MotorMotor NCSNCS shouldshould bebe normalnormal –– SometimesSometimes lowlow amplitudeamplitude withwith severesevere diseasedisease FF--WAVESWAVES MotorMotor axonsaxons andand axonalaxonal poolpool atat spinalspinal cordcord levellevel longlong pathwayspathways differentdifferent axonsaxons involvedinvolved withwith eacheach responseresponse MinimalMinimal latencylatency,, meanmean latency,latency, dispersiondispersion InconsistentInconsistent morphologymorphology andand latencylatency MaximalMaximal stimulusstimulus responseresponse NotNot helpfulhelpful forfor radiculopathy,radiculopathy, goodgood screenscreen forfor polyneuropathypolyneuropathy HH--REFLEXESREFLEXES MonosynapticMonosynaptic electricalelectrical AchillesAchilles reflexreflex LongLong pathwaypathway AbnormalAbnormal inin sciaticsciatic n.n. plexopathy,plexopathy, S1S1 radicradic SubmaximalSubmaximal stimulusstimulus responseresponse ConsistentConsistent inin latencylatency andand morphologymorphology ExtinguishesExtinguishes withwith supramaximalsupramaximal stimulusstimulus OnlyOnly 50%50% sensitivesensitive forfor S1S1 radiculopathyradiculopathy butbut highhigh specificityspecificity 91%91% MayMay helphelp withwith L5L5 vsvs S1S1 BetterBetter screenscreen forfor polyneuropathypolyneuropathy ElectromyographyElectromyography MostMost importantimportant testtest forfor suspectedsuspected radiculopathyradiculopathy GoodGood confirmatoryconfirmatory testtest HelpsHelps clarifyclarify relevancerelevance ofof imagingimaging findingsfindings EDXEDX CRITERIACRITERIA FORFOR RADICULOPATHYRADICULOPATHY AbnormalitiesAbnormalities inin 22 oror moremore musclesmuscles –– SameSame nervenerve rootroot –– DifferentDifferent peripheralperipheral nervesnerves MuscleMuscle innervatedinnervated byby adjacentadjacent nervenerve rootsroots areare normalnormal OtherOther conditionsconditions areare excludedexcluded EMGEMG SENSITIVITIESSENSITIVITIES FORFOR LUMBOSACRALLUMBOSACRAL RADICULOPATHIESRADICULOPATHIES VariesVaries widelywidely RangesRanges fromfrom aboutabout 50%50% toto 80%80% VariousVarious diagnosticdiagnostic standardsstandards Study Sample Gold standard EMG size sensitivity % Lumbosacral radiculopathy Clinical+imaging HNP Weber and Albert [55] 42 60 Clinical Nardin et al [28] 47 55 Clinical Kuruoglu et al [8] 100 86 Clinical Khatri et al [56] 95 64 Clinical Tonzola et al [57] 57 49 Surgically proven Schoendinger [58] 100 56 Surgically proven Knutsson [45] 206 79 Clinical an imaging Young et al [3] 100 84 Myelography and CT Linden and Berlit [3] 19 78 EMGEMG SENSITIVITYSENSITIVITY FORFOR CERVICALCERVICAL RADICULOPATHIESRADICULOPATHIES VariesVaries widelywidely AboutAbout 50%50% toto 70%70% UsuallyUsually clinicalclinical and/orand/or myelographicmyelographic Study Sample Gold standard EMG size sensitivity % Lumbosacral spinal stenosis 68 Clinical+myelogram 92 Hall et al [46] 64 Clinical+myelogram 88 Johnsson et al [59] Cervical radiculopathy Berger et al [60] 18 Clinical 61 Partanen et al [61] 77 Intraoperative 67 Leblhuber et al [9] 24 Clinical+myelogram 67 So et
Recommended publications
  • Peroneal Neuropathy Misdiagnosed As L5 Radiculopathy: a Case Report Michael D Reife1,2* and Christopher M Coulis3,4,5
    Reife and Coulis Chiropractic & Manual Therapies 2013, 21:12 http://www.chiromt.com/content/21/1/12 CHIROPRACTIC & MANUAL THERAPIES CASE REPORT Open Access Peroneal neuropathy misdiagnosed as L5 radiculopathy: a case report Michael D Reife1,2* and Christopher M Coulis3,4,5 Abstract Objective: The purpose of this case report is to describe a patient who presented with a case of peroneal neuropathy that was originally diagnosed and treated as a L5 radiculopathy. Clinical features: A 53-year old female registered nurse presented to a private chiropractic practice with complaints of left lateral leg pain. Three months earlier she underwent elective left L5 decompression surgery without relief of symptoms. Intervention and outcome: Lumbar spine MRI seven months prior to lumbar decompression surgery revealed left neural foraminal stenosis at L5-S1. The patient symptoms resolved after she stopped crossing her legs. Conclusion: This report discusses a case of undiagnosed peroneal neuropathy that underwent lumbar decompression surgery for a L5 radiculopathy. This case study demonstrates the importance of a thorough clinical examination and decision making that ensures proper patient diagnosis and management. Keywords: Peroneal neuropathy, Lumbar radiculopathy, Chiropractic Background Case presentation The most common entrapment neuropathy in the lo- The patient is a 53-year-old registered nurse who was wer extremity is common peroneal mononeuropathy, ac- referred to the author’s office in August 2003 by her pri- counting for approximately 15% of all mononeuropathies mary care physician with a chief complaint of left leg in adults [1]. Most injuries occur at the fibular head and pain. Her symptoms began in October 2002 after she fell can be the result of many factors including chronic low off an ambulance landing on her left hip.
    [Show full text]
  • An Audit of Bone Mineral Density and Associated Factors in Patients With
    Review Article Clinician’s corner Images in Medicine Experimental Research Case Report Miscellaneous Letter to Editor DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2019/39690.12544 Original Article Postgraduate Education An Audit of Bone Mineral Density and Case Series Associated Factors in Patients with Orthopaedics Section Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Short Communication ARASH RAHBAR1, RAHMATOLLAH JOKAR2, SEYED MOKHTAR ESMAEILNEJAD-GANJI3 ABSTRACT Results: Overall, 146 patients with lumbar stenosis were Introduction: Osteoporosis is a major global health problem enrolled. Based on bone densitometry of spine and femur, and is commonly observed with lumbar stenosis in older 35 (24%) and 36 (24.7%) of the patients had osteoporosis. people. It is stated that osteoporosis may cause progressive According to femoral densitometry, age (OR=1.311, 95% CI: spinal deformities and stenosis in elderly patients. 1.167-1.473), being a female (OR=3.391, 95% CI: 1.391-8.420) and being a homemaker (OR=3.675, 95% CI: 1.476-9.146) Aim: To audit prevalence of low bone mineral density and were found as risk factors for osteoporosis. Based on spinal associated factors in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. densitometry, age (OR=1.283, 95% CI: 1.154-1.427) and being Materials and Methods: Patients with symptomatic lumbar a female (OR=2.786, 95% CI: 1.106-7.019) were associated with spinal stenosis were recruited in this cross-sectional study, osteoporosis. Significant correlations were observed between who had been referred to Shahid Beheshti hospital in Babol, bone mineral density and red blood cell counts (r=+0.168, Northern Iran, between 2016 and 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIATICA Sciatica Describes Nerve Pain in the Leg That Is Caused by Irritation And/Or Compression of the Sciatic Nerve
    ARYA AYURVEDIC PANCHAKARMA CENTRE SCIATICA Sciatica describes nerve pain in the leg that is caused by irritation and/or compression of the Sciatic nerve. Sciatica originates in the lower back, radiates deep into the buttock and travels down the leg. Sciatica is a direct result of sciatic nerve or sciatic nerve root pathology. The sciatic nerve is the largest nerve in the body with about 2cm in diameter. It arises from the L4, L5, S1, S2 and S3 spinal roots and exits the pelvis posteriorly through the greater sciatic foramen. This nerve provides direct motor function to the hamstrings, lower extremity adductors as well as indirect motor function to the calf muscles, anterior lower leg muscles and some intrinsic foot muscles. Indirectly, through its terminal branches, the sciatic nerve affects also the posterior and lateral lower leg as well as the plantar foot. So any irritation to this nerve can cause pain and/or paresthesias starting from lower back and can extend till the feet. Sciatica is a debilitating condition in which the patient experiences pain and/or paraesthe- sias in the distribution of the sciatic nerve or of an associated lumbosacral nerve root. The lifetime incidence of this condition is estimated to be up to 40 %. The condition can be- come chronic and intractable, with major socio-economic implications. ETIOLOGY • Lumbar spinal stenosis • Herniated or bulging lumbar intervertebral disc • Spondylolisthesis • Relative misalignment of one vertebra relative to another • Lumbar or pelvic muscle spasm or inflammation Copyrigh: Dr.Rohini VK, ARYA AYURVEDIC CENTRE ARYA AYURVEDIC PANCHAKARMA CENTRE • Spinal or Paraspinal masses included malignancy, epidural haematoma or epidural abscess • Lumbar degenerative disc disease • Sacroiliac joint dysfunction EPIDEMIOLOGY GENDER: There appears to be no gender predominance.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiculopathy Vs. Spinal Stenosis: Evocative Electrodiagnosis Identifies the Main Pain Generator
    Functional Electromyography Loren M. Fishman · Allen N. Wilkins Functional Electromyography Provocative Maneuvers in Electrodiagnosis 123 Loren M. Fishman, MD Allen N. Wilkins, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons Manhattan Physical Medicine Columbia University and Rehabilitation New York, NY 10028, USA New York, NY 10013, USA [email protected] ISBN 978-1-60761-019-9 e-ISBN 978-1-60761-020-5 DOI 10.1007/978-1-60761-020-5 Springer New York Dordrecht Heidelberg London Library of Congress Control Number: 2010935087 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. While the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of going to press, neither the authors nor the editors nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonoperative Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication a Systematic Review
    SPINE Volume 37, Number 10, pp E609–E616 ©2012, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins LITERATURE REVIEW Nonoperative Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication A Systematic Review Carlo Ammendolia , DC, PhD, *†‡ Kent Stuber, DC, MSc , § Linda K. de Bruin , MSc , ‡ Andrea D. Furlan, MD, PhD , ||‡¶ Carol A. Kennedy, BScPT, MSc , ‡#** Yoga Raja Rampersaud, MD , †† Ivan A. Steenstra , PhD , ‡ and Victoria Pennick, RN, BScN, MHSc ‡‡ or methylcobalamin, improve walking distance. There is very low- Study Design. Systematic review. quality evidence from a single trial that epidural steroid injections Objective. To systematically review the evidence for the improve pain, function, and quality of life up to 2 weeks compared effectiveness of nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with home exercise or inpatient physical therapy. There is low- with neurogenic claudication. quality evidence from a single trial that exercise is of short-term Summary of Background Data. Neurogenic claudication benefi t for leg pain and function compared with no treatment. There can signifi cantly impact functional ability, quality of life, and is low- and very low-quality evidence from 6 trials that multimodal independence in the elderly. nonoperative treatment is less effective than indirect or direct Methods. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, surgical decompression with or without fusion. and ICL databases up to January 2011 for randomized controlled Conclusion. Moderate- and high-GRADE evidence for nonopera- trials published in English, in which at least 1 arm provided tive treatment is lacking and thus prohibiting recommendations to data on nonoperative treatments. Risk of bias in each study was guide clinical practice. Given the expected exponential rise in the independently assessed by 2 reviewers using 12 criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Brachial-Plexopathy.Pdf
    Brachial Plexopathy, an overview Learning Objectives: The brachial plexus is the network of nerves that originate from cervical and upper thoracic nerve roots and eventually terminate as the named nerves that innervate the muscles and skin of the arm. Brachial plexopathies are not common in most practices, but a detailed knowledge of this plexus is important for distinguishing between brachial plexopathies, radiculopathies and mononeuropathies. It is impossible to write a paper on brachial plexopathies without addressing cervical radiculopathies and root avulsions as well. In this paper will review brachial plexus anatomy, clinical features of brachial plexopathies, differential diagnosis, specific nerve conduction techniques, appropriate protocols and case studies. The reader will gain insight to this uncommon nerve problem as well as the importance of the nerve conduction studies used to confirm the diagnosis of plexopathies. Anatomy of the Brachial Plexus: To assess the brachial plexus by localizing the lesion at the correct level, as well as the severity of the injury requires knowledge of the anatomy. An injury involves any condition that impairs the function of the brachial plexus. The plexus is derived of five roots, three trunks, two divisions, three cords, and five branches/nerves. Spinal roots join to form the spinal nerve. There are dorsal and ventral roots that emerge and carry motor and sensory fibers. Motor (efferent) carries messages from the brain and spinal cord to the peripheral nerves. This Dorsal Root Sensory (afferent) carries messages from the peripheral to the Ganglion is why spinal cord or both. A small ganglion containing cell bodies of sensory NCS’s sensory fibers lies on each posterior root.
    [Show full text]
  • Piriformis Syndrome: the Literal “Pain in My Butt” Chelsea Smith, PTA
    Piriformis Syndrome: the literal “pain in my butt” Chelsea Smith, PTA Aside from the monotony of day-to-day pains and annoyances, piriformis syndrome is the literal “pain in my butt” that may not go away with sending the kids to grandmas and often takes the form of sciatica. Many individuals with pain in the buttock that radiates down the leg are experiencing a form of sciatica caused by irritation of the spinal nerves in or near the lumbar spine (1). Other times though, the nerve irritation is not in the spine but further down the leg due to a pesky muscle called the piriformis, hence “piriformis syndrome”. The piriformis muscle is a flat, pyramidal-shaped muscle that originates from the front surface of the sacrum and the joint capsule of the sacroiliac joint (SI joint) and is located deep in the gluteal tissue (2). The piriformis travels through the greater sciatic foramen and attaches to the upper surface of the greater trochanter (or top of the hip bone) while the sciatic nerve runs under (and sometimes through) the piriformis muscle as it exits the pelvis. Due to this close proximity between the piriformis muscle and the sciatic nerve, if there is excessive tension (tightness), spasm, or inflammation of the piriformis muscle this can cause irritation to the sciatic nerve leading to symptoms of sciatica (pain down the leg) (1). Activities like sitting on hard surfaces, crouching down, walking or running for long distances, and climbing stairs can all increase symptoms (2) with the most common symptom being tenderness along the piriformis muscle (deep in the gluteal region) upon palpation.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Spinal Cord Injury in a Patient with Ankylosing Spondylitis
    Spinal Cord (1999) 37, 305 ± 307 ã 1999 International Medical Society of Paraplegia All rights reserved 1362 ± 4393/99 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/sc Case Report Double spinal cord injury in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis MN Akman*,1 M KaratasÎ1, SÎ KilincË 1 and M AgÏ ildere1 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Radiology, BahcË elievler, Ankara, Turkey Ankylosing spondylitis patients are more prone to spinal fractures and these fractures commonly result in mobile nonunion. We report a patient with a 30-year history of ankylosing spondylitis who sustained double spinal cord injuries following minor trauma. The ®rst injury occurred at the lumbar level due to pseudoarthrosis of an old fracture, and the second at the thoracic level following cardiopulmonary arrest and an episode of hypotension. The possible mechanisms of the injuries are discussed and maintaining normal blood pressure in these patients is emphasized. Keywords: spinal cord injury; ankylosing spondylitis; spinal cord infarction; spinal fractures Introduction Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has a prevalance of 1 per diagnostic workup. His arterial blood pressure stayed 1000 in the general population and primarily involves below normal and his central venous pressure remained 1 the vertebral column. Spinal rigidity due to long- below 5 cmH2O for about 12 h. ECG, chest X-Ray standing AS renders the patient susceptible to vertebral and cranial computed tomography (CT) were normal. trauma, so that even minor trauma may cause When the patient awoke and was in a stable condition, fractures.2±9 There are only a few reports in the he could not feel or move his legs.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Help for Spinal Stenosis Information for Patients
    Self-help for Spinal Stenosis Information for patients What is spinal stenosis? Spinal stenosis is a common condition affecting the lower back. It affects people over the age of 60 years. Spinal stenosis can result in symptoms including back pain, buttock pain and leg pain. Other symptoms include pins and needles, numbness and sometimes weakness in the legs or feet. If you have spinal stenosis you will likely experience a combination of these symptoms. What causes spinal stenosis? The spinal cord runs through a tunnel made from the bones in your back called vertebrae. This is because the bones are strong and act to protect the spinal cord. The nerves then branch out from the spinal cord and pass through smaller tunnels at the side of your spine. Sometimes the aging process leads to narrowing in parts of the lower back. This usually occurs gradually over time. The nerves and spinal cord may become tightened or squeezed as a result of this narrowing. Stenosis is the medical term for narrowing. Narrowing in the spine is very common but not everyone who has it will develop symptoms. Spinal stenosis can also occur at different levels in the spine. It is possible to get similar symptoms in your legs and feet that are not caused by spinal stenosis. Will spinal stenosis get better? It is not possible to reverse any age-related changes in the back; however it is possible to manage and improve your symptoms. Many people will experience “flare-ups” so it is important that you are confident in ways to manage your symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Piriformis Syndrome Is Overdiagnosed 11 Robert A
    American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine AANEM CROSSFIRE: CONTROVERSIES IN NEUROMUSCULAR AND ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC MEDICINE Loren M. Fishman, MD, B.Phil Robert A.Werner, MD, MS Scott J. Primack, DO Willam S. Pease, MD Ernest W. Johnson, MD Lawrence R. Robinson, MD 2005 AANEM COURSE F AANEM 52ND Annual Scientific Meeting Monterey, California CROSSFIRE: Controversies in Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Loren M. Fishman, MD, B.Phil Robert A.Werner, MD, MS Scott J. Primack, DO Willam S. Pease, MD Ernest W. Johnson, MD Lawrence R. Robinson, MD 2005 COURSE F AANEM 52nd Annual Scientific Meeting Monterey, California AANEM Copyright © September 2005 American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine 421 First Avenue SW, Suite 300 East Rochester, MN 55902 PRINTED BY JOHNSON PRINTING COMPANY, INC. ii CROSSFIRE: Controversies in Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Faculty Loren M. Fishman, MD, B.Phil Scott J. Primack, DO Assistant Clinical Professor Co-director Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Colorado Rehabilitation and Occupational Medicine Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons Denver, Colorado New York City, New York Dr. Primack completed his residency at the Rehabilitation Institute of Dr. Fishman is a specialist in low back pain and sciatica, electrodiagnosis, Chicago in 1992. He then spent 6 months with Dr. Larry Mack at the functional assessment, and cognitive rehabilitation. Over the last 20 years, University of Washington. Dr. Mack, in conjunction with the Shoulder he has lectured frequently and contributed over 55 publications. His most and Elbow Service at the University of Washington, performed some of the recent work, Relief is in the Stretch: End Back Pain Through Yoga, and the original research utilizing musculoskeletal ultrasound in order to diagnose earlier book, Back Talk, both written with Carol Ardman, were published shoulder pathology.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuropathy, Radiculopathy & Myelopathy
    Neuropathy, Radiculopathy & Myelopathy Jean D. Francois, MD Neurology & Neurophysiology Purpose and Objectives PURPOSE Avoid Confusing Certain Key Neurologic Concepts OBJECTIVES • Objective 1: Define & Identify certain types of Neuropathies • Objective 2: Define & Identify Radiculopathy & its causes • Objective 3: Define & Identify Myelopathy FINANCIAL NONE DISCLOSURE Basics What is Neuropathy? • The term 'neuropathy' is used to describe a problem with the nerves, usually the 'peripheral nerves' as opposed to the 'central nervous system' (the brain and spinal cord). It refers to Peripheral neuropathy • It covers a wide area and many nerves, but the problem it causes depends on the type of nerves that are affected: • Sensory nerves (the nerves that control sensation>skin) causing cause tingling, pain, numbness, or weakness in the feet and hands • Motor nerves (the nerves that allow power and movement>muscles) causing weakness in the feet and hands • Autonomic nerves (the nerves that control the systems of the body eg gut, bladder>internal organs) causing changes in the heart rate and blood pressure or sweating • It May produce Numbness, tingling,(loss of sensation) along with weakness. It can also cause pain. • It can affect a single nerve (mononeuropathy) or multiple nerves (polyneuropathy) Neuropathy • Symptoms usually start in the longest nerves in the body: Feet & later on the hands (“Stocking-glove” pattern) • Symptoms usually spread slowly and evenly up the legs and arms. Other body parts may also be affected. • Peripheral Neuropathy can affect people of any age. But mostly people over age 55 • CAUSES: Neuropathy has a variety of forms and causes. (an injury systemic illness, an infection, an inherited disorder) some of the causes are still unknown.
    [Show full text]
  • Surgery for Lumbar Radiculopathy/ Sciatica Final Evidence Report
    Surgery for Lumbar Radiculopathy/ Sciatica Final evidence report April 13, 2018 Health Technology Assessment Program (HTA) Washington State Health Care Authority PO Box 42712 Olympia, WA 98504-2712 (360) 725-5126 www.hca.wa.gov/hta [email protected] Prepared by: RTI International–University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 www.rti.org This evidence report is based on research conducted by the RTI-UNC Evidence-based Practice Center through a contract between RTI International and the State of Washington Health Care Authority (HCA). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents. The findings and conclusions do not represent the views of the Washington HCA and no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of Washington HCA. The information in this report is intended to help the State of Washington’s independent Health Technology Clinical Committee make well-informed coverage determinations. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information (i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances presented by individual patients). This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without permission except those copyrighted materials that are clearly noted in the document. Further reproduction of those copyrighted materials is prohibited without the specific permission of copyright holders.
    [Show full text]