DOCSLIB.ORG

North Sandlin Bay Ecosystem Restoration Biological Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Sandlin Bay Ecosystem Restoration Biological Assessment North Sandlin Bay Ecosystem Restoration Project Biological Assessment for Proposed, Threatened, United States and Endangered Wildlife Species Department of Agriculture Forest Service May 2016 For More Information Contact: Ivan Green, District Ranger 24874 U.S. Highway 90 Sanderson, FL, 32087 386-752-2577 In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410; (2) fax: (202) 690- 7442; or (3) email: [email protected] . USDA is an equal opportunity provider, employer and lender. North Sandlin Bay Ecosystem Restoration Biological Assessment LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF TABLES...................................................................................................................................................... 3 CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 1 NEED FOR RE-ASSESSMENT BASED ON CHANGED CONDITIONS .............................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROPOSED ACTION ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Other Activities Related to the Proposed Action ...................................................................................................... 10 Design Criteria for the Proposed Action ................................................................................................................... 11 PROPOSED, ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES ........................................................................... 13 Individual Species Requirements.............................................................................................................................. 14 List of Preparers and Reviewers: ............................................................................................................................. 27 LITERATURE CITED OR USED FOR SPECIES REVIEW ................................................................................. 28 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the Osceola National Forest ........................................................................................................ 2 Figure 2. Location of the Sandlin Bay Project. .............................................................................................................. 4 Figure 3. Proposed Action for Compartment 111 .......................................................................................................... 6 Figure 4. Proposed Action for Compartment 120 .......................................................................................................... 7 Figure 5. Project area wetlands. ................................................................................................................................... 20 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Compartment 111 stands selected for treatment. ............................................................................................. 8 Table 2. Compartment 120 stands selected for treatment. ............................................................................................. 9 Table 3. Road reconstruction for sale haul routes. ....................................................................................................... 10 Table 4. Project Design Criteria to minimize or avoid impacts of project activities. .................................................. 12 Table 5. Frosted Flatwoods Salamander Surveys within Osceola National Forest (U.S. Forest Service, 2012). ....... 23 North Sandlin Bay Ecosystem Restoration Biological Assessment CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS In accordance with the Endangered Species Act and its implementing regulations and FSM 2671.4, the Osceola National Forest is required to obtain written concurrence from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) with respect to the determination of "may affect, not likely to adversely affect" for listed species considered in this Biological Assessment. NEED FOR RE-ASSESSMENT BASED ON CHANGED CONDITIONS The findings of this Biological Assessment are based on the best data and scientific information available at the time of preparation. If new information becomes available that reveals potential effects to sensitive species or their habitats in a manner or to an extent not considered within this evaluation; if the proposed action is subsequently modified in a manner that causes an effect that was not considered in this evaluation; or if a new species is listed or habitat identified that may be affected by the proposed action, a revised biological evaluation will be prepared. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Biological Assessment is to document potential effects of the proposed federal action on endangered and threatened species or their habitat and to ensure that land management decisions are made with the benefit of such knowledge. The following objectives as stated in FSM 2672.41 will be met: 1. To comply with the requirements of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. To ensure that actions of Federal agencies do not jeopardize the continued existence of a species or result in adverse modification of designated critical habitat. 2. To provide a process and standard which will ensure that endangered and threatened species receive full consideration in the decision making process. The Osceola National Forests (OSC) Wildlife Proposed, Endangered, Threatened or Sensitive (PETS) species list (Appendix A) was reviewed to determine whether any PETS species could be potentially affected by the proposed action. Florida panther (Felis concolor coryi) was considered as part of this Biological Assessment but eliminated from detailed evaluation. Florida panther do not currently inhabit OSC; however, they could potentially be reintroduced in the future. In addition, American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) was also considered as part of this Biological Assessment but eliminated from detailed evaluation. The American alligator is listed due to their similarity of appearance to American crocodile (Crocodylus acutus). However, American crocodiles occur in isolated areas within south Florida and do not occur within OSC. There are no federally listed threatened or endangered plant species within OSC. 1 North Sandlin Bay Ecosystem Restoration Biological Assessment The following evaluation methods were used to determine which species to address and potential effects of the project: . Review of U.S. Forest Service location records for listed species. Review of Florida Natural Areas Inventory records within the project area. Field examination by David K. Dorman for habitat evaluation and evidence of use by animals during 2011 and Amy D. Thompson in 2013. Informal consultation with staff of the Osceola Ranger District concerning animal occurrences and historic effects from logging and prescribed fire on the forest. Literature review for PETS species to better understand life history characteristics, habitat requirements and potential effects of the proposed action. PROPOSED ACTION The North Sandlin Bay Restoration project proposes management activities for approximately 2,500 acres in the northwest area of the Osceola National Forest (OSC; T2N R17E) within Forest Compartments 111 and 120. The name derives from a large swamp west of the project area shown on U.S. Geological Survey maps as Sandlin Bay (Figure 1). The stands proposed for management activities are within Forest Compartments 111 and 120, combined the Compartments total about 10,700 acres, including
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prey Records for the Eastern Indigo Snake {Drymarchon Couperi)
    2010 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 9(1):1-18 Prey Records for the Eastern Indigo Snake {Drymarchon couperi) Dirk J. Stevenson'*, M. Rebecca Bolt^ Daniel J. Smith', Kevin M. Enge^ Natalie L. Hyslop'^ Terry M. Norton'•^ and Karen J. Abstract - Prey items for the federally protected Easteni Indigo Snake (Drymarchort couperi) were compiled from published and gray literature, field observations, necrop- sies, dissection of museum specimens, and personal communications from reliable sources. One hundred and eighty-six records were obtained for 48 different prey spe- cies. Anurans, Gopher Tortoises, snakes, and rodents comprised ca. 85% of the prey items. Most records (n = 143) that mentioned size were from adult indigos; 17 were from juveniles. Prey records were collected from 1940-2008 and were available for all months of the year. These data confirm that Eastern Indigo Snakes eat a wide assortment of prey of varying sizes. This strategy allows D. couperi to potentially forage success- fully in many different types of habitats and under fluctuating environmental conditions, a valuable trait for a lop-level predator that requires a large home range. IatroducHon Drymarchon couperi Holbrook (Eastern Indigo Snake), with a maximum recorded total length of 2629 mm, is one of the largest snakes in North America (Conant and Collins 1991). It has been federally listed as Threat- ened since 1978 under the Endangered Species Act (US Fish and Wildlife Service 1978). Drymarchon couperi is diurnal and mostly terrestrial (Layne and Steiner 1996, US Fish and Wildlife Service 2008). Of the two main hunt- ing strategies employed by snakes (ambush predator vs. active forager; see Mushinsky 1987), D.
    [Show full text]
  • MSRP Appendix A
    APPENDIX A: RECOVERY TEAM MEMBERS Multi-Species Recovery Plan for South Florida Appendix A. Names appearing in bold print denote those who authored or prepared Appointed Recovery various components of the recovery plan. Team Members Ralph Adams Geoffrey Babb Florida Atlantic University The Nature Conservancy Biological Sciences 222 South Westmonte Drive, Suite 300 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Altimonte Springs, Florida 32714-4236 Ross Alliston Alice Bard Monroe County, Environmental Florida Department of Environmental Resource Director Protection 2798 Overseas Hwy Florida Park Service, District 3 Marathon , Florida 33050 1549 State Park Drive Clermont, Florida 34711 Ken Alvarez Florida Department of Enviromental Bob Barron Protection U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Florida Park Service, 1843 South Trail Regulatory Division Osprey, Florida 34229 P.O. Box 4970 Jacksonville, Florida 32232-0019 Loran Anderson Florida State University Oron L. “Sonny” Bass Department of Biological Science National Park Service Tallahassee, Florida 32306-2043 Everglades National Park 40001 State Road 9336 Tom Armentano Homestead, Florida 33034-6733 National Park Service Everglades National Park Steven Beissinger 40001 State Road 9336 Yale University - School of Homestead, Florida 33034-6733 Forestry & Environmental Studies Sage Hall, 205 Prospect Street David Arnold New Haven, Connecticut 06511 Florida Department of Environmental Protection Rob Bennetts 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard P.O. Box 502 Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 West Glacier, Montana 59936 Daniel F. Austin Michael Bentzien Florida Atlantic University U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Sciences Jacksonville Field Office 777 Glades Road 6620 Southpoint Drive South, Suite 310 Boca Raton, Florida 33431 Jacksonville, Florida 32216-0912 David Auth Nancy Bissett University of Florida The Natives Florida Museum of Natural History 2929 J.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Indigo Snake (Flier)
    How To Distinguish Eastern Indigo Snakes Eastern indigo snakes became federally protected as threatened under the Endangered Species Act From Other Common Species in 1978, and they are also protected as threatened by Florida and Georgia. It is illegal to harass, harm, capture, keep, or kill an eastern indigo snake without specific state and/or federal permits. Life History Eastern indigo snakes use a wide variety of habitats The historic range of the eastern ranging from very wet to very dry. They tend to stay indigo snake (shown in dark green) in a specific area known as a home range, but this extended from the southern-most tip Adult eastern indigo snakes may be area is not static and can change over time, of South Carolina west through southern confused with few other species, due Georgia, Alabama, and into eastern to the indigo’s glossy blue-black probably in response to habitat conditions and Mississippi. The current range is shown in color and large size (5–7 ft.). prey availability. Because indigo snakes are sizeable light green. The eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon predators that actively hunt for their food, they couperi) has the distinction of being the need large home ranges. Males have been shown longest snake native to the United States. to use between 50 and 800 acres, whereas females often used for shelter. The snake may share the Eastern indigos typically range from 5 to 7 occupy up to 370 acres. During the winter, home burrow with a tortoise, but most often indigos will feet long, but can reach lengths greater than range sizes are smaller, particularly in the cooler occupy an old burrow that a tortoise has deserted.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Rule to List Reticulated Python And
    Vol. 80 Tuesday, No. 46 March 10, 2015 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife 50 CFR Part 16 Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing Three Anaconda Species and One Python Species as Injurious Reptiles; Final Rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Mar 09, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\10MRR2.SGM 10MRR2 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES2 12702 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 46 / Tuesday, March 10, 2015 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 3330) to list Burmese (and Indian) Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, pythons, Northern African pythons, Fish and Wildlife Service FL 32960–3559; telephone 772–562– Southern African pythons, and yellow 3909 ext. 256; facsimile 772–562–4288. anacondas as injurious wildlife under 50 CFR Part 16 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bob the Lacey Act. The remaining five RIN 1018–AV68 Progulske, Everglades Program species (reticulated python, boa Supervisor, South Florida Ecological constrictor, green anaconda, [Docket No. FWS–R9–FHC–2008–0015; Services Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife DeSchauensee’s anaconda, and Beni FXFR13360900000–145–FF09F14000] Service, 1339 20th Street, Vero Beach, anaconda) were not listed at that time and remained under consideration for Injurious Wildlife Species; Listing FL 32960–3559; telephone 772–469– 4299. If you use a telecommunications listing. With this final rule, we are Three Anaconda Species and One listing four of those species (reticulated Python Species as Injurious Reptiles device for the deaf (TDD), please call the Federal Information Relay Service python, green anaconda, AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, (FIRS) at 800–877–8339.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Distributions of Wet Savannas in Tates Hell State Forest
    HISTORIC DISTRIBUTION OF WET SAVANNAS IN TATE'S HELL STATE FOREST FINAL REPORT DECEMBER 1997 CAROLYN KINDELL, PRO.JECT MANAGER/EcOLOGIST '. I Historic Distribution of I Wet Savannas in I Tate's Hell State Forest I Final Report • for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service I (Agreement #1448-0004-96-9102) and Northwest Florida Water Management District • • December 1997 • Carolyn Kindell, M Project Manager/Ecologist - � - Florida Natural Areas Inventory 1018 Thomasville Road, Suite #200c • Tallahassee, Florida 32303 (850) 224-8207 , http://www . fnai. org • Gary R. Knight, Program Director • • Cover Photographs: top: Wet prairie in Apalachicola National Forest, Ann Johnson, FNAI middle: 1942 BW aerial of a selected portion of Tate's Hell State Forest, National Archives, Washington, D.C. bottom: 1994 infrared aerial of a selected portion of Tate's Hell State Forest, National Aerial Photography Program, Photo Science, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD. Recommended Citation: Kindell, Carolyn. 1997. Historic Distribution of Wet Savannas in Tate's Hell State Forest. Final Report for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Agreement #1448,0004,96,9102) and Northwest Florida Water Management District. Florida Natural Areas Inventory, Tallahassee, Florida. ABSTRACT Tate's Hell State Forest is currently 131,000 acres or low pine tJatwoods, pine plantation, swamps, and coastal scmh in Franklin and Liberty Counties, Plorida and is managed by the Florida Department of Agriculture's Division of Forestry (FDOF). The original 214,000 acre tract was proposed for purchase under the Florida Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) program in 1992, and acquisition is still underway. The Tate's Hell tract is vital to the maintenance of water quality in Apalachicola Bay and provides critical habitat for rare plants, animals, and natural communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Everglades to Okeefenokee – a Thousand Miles Through the Heart of Florida
    FLORIDA WILDLIFE CORRIDOR EXPEDITION: EVERGLADES TO OKEEFENOKEE – A THOUSAND MILES THROUGH THE HEART OF FLORIDA The vision of the Florida Wildlife Corridor is to connect natural lands and waters throughout peninsular Florida, from the Everglades to Okeefenokee in southeast Georgia. Despite extensive fragmentation of the landscape in recent decades, a statewide network of connected natural areas is still possible. The first step is raising awareness about the fleeting opportunity we have to connect natural and rural landscapes in order to protect the waters that sustain us, the working farms and ranches that feed us, the forests that clean our air, and the combined habitat these lands provide for Florida’s diverse wildlife, including panthers and black bears. Our goal is to increase public awareness for the Corridor idea through a broad-reaching media campaign, with the Florida Wildlife Corridor Expedition as the center of the outreach strategy. January 17, 2012 marks the kick off the 1000 mile expedition over a 100 day period to increase public awareness and generate support for the Florida Wildlife Corridor. Photographer Carlton Ward Jr, bear biologist Joe Guthrie, conservationist Mallory Lykes Dimmitt and filmmaker Elam Stoltzfus will trek from the Everglades National Park toward Okefenokee National Forest in southern Georgia. They will traverse the wildlife FLORIDA WILDLIFE habitats, watersheds and participating working farms and ranches, which comprise CORRIDOR the Florida Wildlife Corridor opportunity area. KEY ISSUES: The team will document the corridor through photography, video, radio reports, • Protecting and restoring dispersal and daily updates on social media networks, and a host of activities for reporters, migration corridors essential for the landowners, celebrities, conservationists, politicians and other guests.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigo Snake Fact Sheet
    Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais Indigo snakes are massive, blue-black snakes that are a real treat to encounter in the wild. They are the longest snakes in the United States, with some individuals reaching a total length of almost nine feet. The indigo snake’s huge size and gentle demeanor have long made it a favorite with carnivals, sideshows and animal dealers. The commercial popularity of the species caused its numbers to decline dramatically. In 1978, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed indigo snakes as a threatened species in all portions of its range; federal protection has helped to stop collection of these snakes from the wild. The numbers of indigo snakes are still declining throughout most of the Southeast. Habitat loss and fragmentation is the main problem facing these snakes today. These snakes live in a variety of habitats, and historically were found along with gopher tortoises in sandy scrub habitats. They have large home ranges and prefer vast areas, unsettled by people. Habitat throughout much of this snake’s range in Georgia, Florida, Alabama, and Mississippi has been lost to housing developments, shopping centers, and urban sprawl. Many indigo snakes are killed by cars. Indigo snakes are active snakes that spend a great deal of time foraging for food and mates. They are one of the few truly diurnal snake species, meaning that they are active during the day and rest at night. During times of inactivity, such as at night or during cooler months, indigo snakes often hide in gopher tortoise burrows (the tortoises don’t seem to mind).
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Greenway in Northern Florida
    Creating a Greenway in Northern Florida Congressional District: 4 Florida Baker and Columbia Counties Member: Ander Crenshaw Location On the Osceola National Forest in northeastern Florida. Acquired to Date Method Acres Cost ($) Purchase 45,370 $16,799,000 Purpose Conserve and enhance critical scenic, recreational, and wildlife Exchange 18,528 n/a resources; achieve landscape scale conservation with an Donation 7,000 n/a emphasis on restoration, watersheds, natural treasures, climate Partners 40,765 $31,500,000+ change, sustainable bioenergy, and recreation. President’s Buget FY2012 Purchase Acres Cost ($) SWC 435 $1,000,000 Pending Future Action Method Acres* Cost ($) SMR 1,060 $3,500,000 Pending 3,500 $9,000,000 Partners The Suwannee River Water Management District will contribute up to $600,000 towards the purchase of the Suwannee tract. The Trust for Public Land has contributed to pre-acquisition work and is holding the St. Mary’s tract pending Federal purchase. Cooperators State of Florida, Columbia County, Baker County, Florida Sierra Club, The Nature Conservancy, National and Supporters Florida Wildlife Federations, Defenders of Wildlife, Florida and National Audubon Societies, Save the Panther, Habitat for Bears, Florida Defenders of the Environment, Ducks Unlimited. Project These acquisitions are located near the Interstate-10 corridor west of Jacksonville and adjacent to the Osceola Description National Forest. As one of the major export/import locations in the South, the Interstate 10 corridor is under constant pressure as industrial and residential developments expand from suburban Jacksonville, with major industrial growth expected over the next 12 to 36 months. Acquiring these tracts in advance of new development will prevent conversion to other uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2002 Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest Steven T. Dobey University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Dobey, Steven T., "Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2002. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/4533 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Steven T. Dobey entitled "Abundance and Density of Florida Black Bears in Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge and Osceola National Forest." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Wildlife and Fisheries Science. Michael R. Pelton, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Gary McCracken, Lisa Muller, Joseph Clark Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Steven T.
    [Show full text]
  • John Bethea State Forest Management Plan
    TEN-YEAR LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE JOHN M. BETHEA STATE FOREST BAKER COUNTY, FLORIDA PREPARED BY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES FLORIDA FOREST SERVICE APPROVED ON FEBRUARY 19, 2016 TEN-YEAR LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN JOHN M. BETHEA STATE FOREST TABLE OF CONTENTS Land Management Plan Executive Summary ............................................................................... 1 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 2 A. General Mission and Management Plan Direction ............................................................ 2 B. Past Accomplishments ....................................................................................................... 2 C. Goals/Objectives for the Next Ten Year Period ................................................................. 3 II. Administration Section ............................................................................................................. 8 A. Descriptive Information ..................................................................................................... 8 1. Common Name of Property .......................................................................................... 8 2. Legal Description and Acreage..................................................................................... 8 3. Proximity to Other Public Resource ............................................................................. 9 4. Property Acquisition
    [Show full text]
  • Drymarchon Couperi) to Chemical and Visual Stimuli of Mus Musculus
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 6(3):449–454. Submitted: 5 June 2011; Accepted: 23 November 2011; Published: 31 December 2011. CHEMOSENSORY RESPONSE OF THE THREATENED EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE (DRYMARCHON COUPERI) TO CHEMICAL AND VISUAL STIMULI OF MUS MUSCULUS 1 2 3 4 ANTHONY J. SAVIOLA , WILLIAM E. LAMOREAUX , REGIS OPFERMAN , AND DAVID CHISZAR 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, 501 20th Street, CB 92, Greeley, Colorado 80639, USA, e-mail: [email protected] 2Molurus Breeding Center, Longmont, Colorado 80503, USA 3Pueblo Mobile Veterinary Clinic, 5685 Summit View Dr., Pueblo, Colorado 81004, USA 4Department of Psychology, CB 345, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA Abstract.—We tested six adult Eastern Indigo Snakes (Drymarchon couperi) for their response to chemical and visual stimuli from prey. We recorded the rate of tongue flicking, number of tongue flicks directed at the stimuli, and the number of seconds spent investigating the stimuli. Most snake species that have been tested use both chemical and visual cues during predation; however, the relative emphasis on these cues and which cues initiate vomeronasal chemoreception varies among species. For Indigo Snakes, only visual cues of mice (Mus musculus) significantly elevated rates of tongue flicking and investigation of stimuli. In contrast, volatile chemical cues, even in the presence of visual cues, failed to elicit a significant response. Key Words.—chemical cues; Drymarchon couperi; Eastern Indigo Snake; predatory behavior; visual cues INTRODUCTION Indigo Snakes are diurnal active foragers, rapidly approaching and swallowing live or immobilized prey Snakes in general use both chemical and visual stimuli (Keegan 1944; Moulis 1976; Dodd and Barichivich from prey during hunting (Chiszar et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphate in the Forest: Mandated Or Precluded by the Mineral Leasing Act
    Volume 24 Issue 3 Summer 1984 Summer 1984 Phosphate in the Forest: Mandated or Precluded by the Mineral Leasing Act H. Alan Pell Recommended Citation H. A. Pell, Phosphate in the Forest: Mandated or Precluded by the Mineral Leasing Act, 24 Nat. Resources J. 571 (1984). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol24/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. H. ALAN PELL* Phosphate in the Forest: Mandated or Precluded by the Mineral Leasing Actt INTRODUCTION Phosphorous was discovered in 1669 by Hennig Brandt,I an obscure alchemist in Hamburg. Herr Brandt "distilled a strange wax-like sub- stance [which] glowed and sputtered, and gave off an eerie, yellowish light." 2 While the mystery surrounding phosphorous has abated, its im- portance to the world's population has not. A wide variety of manufactured goods require the use of phosphorous, 3 but it is utilized primarily as an essential component of fertilizer.4 Unfortunately, the most common method of procuring phosphorous requires strip-mining for phosphate rock. Although strip-mining for phos- phate rock has been carried on in central Florida for many years, 5 the phosphate industry only recently focused its attention on the forested lands of northern Florida. 6 While reclamation efforts on strip-mined lands have met with varying degrees of success, where the land to be strip- mined bears other valuable resources, restoration may not be possible.7 *Attorney at Law, Gainesville, Florida.
    [Show full text]