Procyonid (Procyonidae) Care Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Procyonid (Procyonidae) Care Manual PROCYONID (Procyonidae) CARE MANUAL CREATED BY THE AZA Small Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE AZA Animal Welfare Committee Procyonid (Procyonidae) Care Manual Procyonid (Procyonidae) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Small Carnivore TAG 2010. Procyonid (Procyonidae) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. p.114. Original Completion Date: 13 August 2008, 1st revision June 2009, 2nd revision May 2010 Authors and Significant contributors: Jan Reed-Smith, M.A., Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Celeste (Dusty) Lombardi, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium, AZA Small Carnivore TAG (SCTAG) Chair Mike Maslanka, M.S., Smithsonian‟s National Zoo, AZA Nutrition SAG Barbara Henry, M.S., Cincinnati Zoo and Botanical Garden, AZA Nutrition SAG Chair Miles Roberts, Smithsonian‟s National Zoo Kim Schilling, Animals for Awareness Anneke Moresco, D.V.M., Ph.D., UC Davis, University of California See Appendix L for additional contributors to the Procyonid Care Manual. AZA Staff Editors: Lacey Byrnes, B.S. ACM Intern Candice Dorsey, Ph.D., Director of Animal Conservation Cover Photo Credits: Liz Toth Debbie Thompson Cindy Colling Reviewers: Sue Booth-Binczik, Ph.D., Dallas Zoo Denise Bressler, Logan & Abby‟s Fund Kristofer Helgen, Smithsonian Institution Kim Schilling, Animals for Awareness Mindy Stinner, Conservators‟ Center, Inc. Debbie Thompson, Little Rock Zoo Rhonda Votino Debborah Colbert Ph.D., AZA, Vice President of Animal Conservation Paul Boyle Ph.D., AZA, Senior Vice President of Conservation and Education Disclaimer: This manual presents a compilation of knowledge provided by recognized animal experts based on the current science, practice, and technology of animal management. The manual assembles basic requirements, best practices, and animal care recommendations to maximize capacity for excellence in animal care and welfare. The manual should be considered a work in progress, since practices continue to evolve through advances in scientific knowledge. The use of information within this manual should be in accordance with all local, state, and federal laws and regulations concerning the care of animals. While some government laws and regulations may be referenced in this manual, these are not all-inclusive nor is this manual intended to serve as an evaluation tool for those agencies. The recommendations included are not meant to be exclusive management approaches, diets, medical treatments, or procedures, and may require adaptation to meet the specific needs of individual animals and particular circumstances in each institution. Commercial entities and media identified are not necessarily endorsed by AZA. The statements presented throughout the body of the manual do not represent AZA standards of care unless specifically identified as such in clearly marked sidebar boxes. Association of Zoos and Aquariums 2 Procyonid (Procyonidae) Care Manual Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Taxonomic Classification ...................................................................................................................... 5 Genus, Species, and Status ................................................................................................................. 5 General Information ............................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1. Ambient Environment ........................................................................................................ 9 1.1 Temperature and Humidity ............................................................................................................ 9 1.2 Light ................................................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Water and Air Quality .................................................................................................................... 10 1.4 Sound and Vibration ..................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 2. Habitat Design and Containment .................................................................................. 11 2.1 Space and Complexity .................................................................................................................. 11 2.2 Safety and Containment ............................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 3. Transport ............................................................................................................................. 17 3.1 Preparations ................................................................................................................................... 17 3.2 Protocols ......................................................................................................................................... 17 Chapter 4. Social Environment ........................................................................................................... 19 4.1 Group Structure and Size ............................................................................................................ 19 4.2 Influence of Other Species and Conspecifics ........................................................................... 20 4.3 Introductions and Reintroductions .............................................................................................. 21 Chapter 5. Nutrition ............................................................................................................................... 23 5.1 Nutritional Requirements .............................................................................................................. 23 5.2 Diets ................................................................................................................................................ 26 5.3 Nutritional Evaluations .................................................................................................................. 31 Chapter 6. Veterinary Care .................................................................................................................. 33 6.1 Veterinary Services ....................................................................................................................... 33 6.2 Identification Methods ................................................................................................................... 35 6.3 Transfer Examination and Diagnostic Testing Recommendations ........................................ 35 6.4 Quarantine ...................................................................................................................................... 35 6.5 Preventive Medicine ...................................................................................................................... 37 6.6 Capture, Restraint, and Immobilization ...................................................................................... 41 6.7 Management of Diseases, Disorders, Injuries and/or Isolation.............................................. 42 Chapter 7. Reproduction ...................................................................................................................... 47 7.1 Reproductive Physiology and Behavior ..................................................................................... 47 7.2 Assisted Reproductive Technology ............................................................................................ 49 7.3 Pregnancy and Parturition ........................................................................................................... 49 7.4 Birthing Facilities ........................................................................................................................... 51 7.5 Assisted Rearing ........................................................................................................................... 51 7.6 Contraception ................................................................................................................................. 55 Chapter 8. Behavior Management ..................................................................................................... 57 8.1 Animal Training .............................................................................................................................. 57 8.2 Environmental Enrichment ........................................................................................................... 58 8.3 Staff and Animal Interactions ...................................................................................................... 61 8.4 Staff Skills and Training ................................................................................................................ 62 Chapter 9. Program Animals ............................................................................................................... 64 9.1 Program Animal Policy ................................................................................................................. 64 Association of Zoos and Aquariums 3 Procyonid (Procyonidae) Care Manual 9.2 Institutional Program Animal Plans............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Classification of Mammals 61
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FORCHAPTER SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Classification © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC 4 NOT FORof SALE MammalsOR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 2ND PAGES 9781284032093_CH04_0060.indd 60 8/28/13 12:08 PM CHAPTER 4: Classification of Mammals 61 © Jones Despite& Bartlett their Learning,remarkable success, LLC mammals are much less© Jones stress & onBartlett the taxonomic Learning, aspect LLCof mammalogy, but rather as diverse than are most invertebrate groups. This is probably an attempt to provide students with sufficient information NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FORattributable SALE OR to theirDISTRIBUTION far greater individual size, to the high on the various kinds of mammals to make the subsequent energy requirements of endothermy, and thus to the inabil- discussions of mammalian biology meaningful.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List Lists of Species Check List 12(1): 1833, 24 January 2016 Doi: ISSN 1809-127X © 2016 Check List and Authors
    12 1 1833 the journal of biodiversity data 24 January 2016 Check List LISTS OF SPECIES Check List 12(1): 1833, 24 January 2016 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/12.1.1833 ISSN 1809-127X © 2016 Check List and Authors Carnivores (Mammalia) from areas of Nearctic–Neotropical transition in Puebla, central Mexico: presence, distribution, and conservation Osvaldo Eric Ramírez-Bravo1, 2* and Lorna Hernandez-Santin3 1 Durrell Institute for Conservation Ecology, Marlowe Building, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7NR, England 2 Departamento de Ciencias Químico-Biológicas, Universidad de las Américas, Puebla, Santa Catarina Mártir, Sin Número, Cholula, Puebla. CP. 72820, México 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The Nearctic and Neotropical realms converge and Neotropical realms meet. Thus, Puebla contains in central Mexico, where many areas have not been a wide variety of habitats that range from semi-arid adequately characterized. Our objective was to revise to tropical rain forest, including cloud forests, oak the distribution and conservation status of carnivores in forests, pine forests, tropical dry forests, and xeric scrub the state of Puebla, central Mexico. Between September (Ramírez-Pulido et al. 2005). Elevation in the region 2008 and January 2011, we conducted interviews varies widely ranging from a minimum of 200 m on the and fieldwork on seven previously selected areas. We coastal plains of the Gulf of Mexico up to a maximum of complemented our data with bibliographical research. 5,700 m at the Pico de Orizaba, with abrupt variations We obtained 733 records for 21 species, representing on its four different mountain ranges (Ramírez-Pulido 63% of the carnivores reported for Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeographic and Diversification Patterns of the White-Nosed Coati
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 131 (2019) 149–163 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeographic and diversification patterns of the white-nosed coati (Nasua narica): Evidence for south-to-north colonization of North America T ⁎ Sergio F. Nigenda-Moralesa, , Matthew E. Gompperb, David Valenzuela-Galvánc, Anna R. Layd, Karen M. Kapheime, Christine Hassf, Susan D. Booth-Binczikg, Gerald A. Binczikh, Ben T. Hirschi, Maureen McColginj, John L. Koprowskik, Katherine McFaddenl,1, Robert K. Waynea, ⁎ Klaus-Peter Koepflim,n, a Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA b School of Natural Resources, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA c Departamento de Ecología Evolutiva, Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Conservación, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62209, Mexico d Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA e Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA f Wild Mountain Echoes, Vail, AZ 85641, USA g New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, NY 12233, USA h Amsterdam, New York 12010, USA i Zoology and Ecology, College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia j Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA k School of Natural Resources and the Environment, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA l College of Agriculture, Forestry and Life Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA m Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • John Ball Zoo Exhibit Animals ​(Revised 3/15/19)
    John Ball Zoo Exhibit Animals (revised 3/15/19) ​ Every effort will be made to update this list on a seasonal basis. List subject to change without notice due to ongoing Zoo improvements or animal care. North American Wetlands: ​ Muted Swans Mallard Duck Wild Turkey (off Exhibit) Egyptian Goose American White pelican (located in flamingo exhibit during winter months) Bald Eagle Wild Way Trail: (seasonal) ​ Red-necked wallaby Prehensile tail porcupine Ring-tailed lemur Howler Monkey Sulphur-crested Cockatoo Red’s Hobby Farm: ​ Domestic goats Domestic sheep Chickens Pied Crow Common Barn Owl Budgerigar (seasonal) Bali Mynah (seasonal) Crested Wood Partridge (seasonal) Nicobar Pigeon (seasonal) John Ball Zoo www.jbzoo.org Frogs: ​ Smokey Jungle frogs Chacoan Horned frog Tiger-legged monkey frog Vietnamese Mossy frog Mission Golden-eyed Tree frog Golden Poison dart frog American bullfrog Multiple species of poison dart frog North America: ​ Golden Eagle North American River Otter Painted turtle Blanding’s turtle Common Map turtle Eastern Box turtle Red-eared slider Snapping turtle Canada Lynx Brown Bear Mountain Lion/Cougar Snow Leopard South America: ​ South American tapir Crested screamer Maned Wolf Chilean Flamingo Fulvous Whistling Duck Chiloe Wigeon Ringed Teal Toco Toucan (opening in late May) White-faced Saki monkey John Ball Zoo www.jbzoo.org Africa: ​ Chimpanzee Lion African ground hornbill Egyptian Geese Eastern Bongo Warthog Cape Porcupine (off exhibit) Von der Decken’s hornbill (off exhibit) Forest Realm: Amur Tigers Red Panda
    [Show full text]
  • Coati, White-Nosed - Nasua Narica Page 1 of 19
    BISON-M - Coati, White-nosed - Nasua narica Page 1 of 19 Home Disclaimer Policy Close Window Booklet data last updated on 9/11/2009 Back Print Page Coati, White-nosed Note: If you have any questions, concerns or updates for this species, please click HERE and let us know. Tip: Use Ctrl-F on your keyboard to search for text in this Jump to Section: == Please Select == booklet. Taxonomy Back to top Species IDa 050165 Name Coati, White-nosed Other Common Coatimundi;Coati (Indian Names name);Pizote;El gato solo (Los gatos en familia);Chula;Chulo Category 05 Mammals Elcode AMAJE03010 BLM Code NANA Phylum Chordata Subphylum Vertebrata Class Mammalia Subclass Theria Click here to search Google for images of this species. Order Carnivora SubOrder Fissipedia Predicted Habitat Family Procyonidae Genus Nasua Species narica Subspecies No Data Submitted Authority (Merriam) Scientific Name Nasua narica Account Type This account represents the entire species, including any and all subspecies recognized in http://bison-m.org/booklet.aspx?id=050165 4/11/2011 BISON-M - Coati, White-nosed - Nasua narica Page 2 of 19 the Southwest. There are no separate subspecies accounts relating to this species. Taxonomic 01, 02, 06, 16, 24, 26, References 33 Click here to explore the map further. Comments on Taxonomy The common Mexican coatimundi --Nasua nasua-- barely enters New Mexico, where it is rare and represented by but a single record *01*. This species is also known as Coati (Indian name), Pizote, El gato solo (Los gatos en familia), Chula, and Chulo (Hass, 1997) *33*. 9/23/93 -- Species name changed to N.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    THE GENERA AND SUBGENERA OF RACCOONS AND THEIR ALLIES. By N. HOLLISTER, Assistant Curator, Division of Mammals, United States National Museum. The family Procyonidae offers a remarkable instance of a group of mammal genera in which the differentiation in the structure of the teeth throughout the series is nearly uniform in degree from genus to genus, and strictly definite in direction from one extreme to the other. Tliis condition is particularly interesting because of the wide difference between the teeth of genera from the extremes of the line, and because the widely diverse cranial and external charac- ters show no special tendency toward serial grouping. EUminating the very aberrant Bassariscus, which clearly does not belong in this series of genera, the superspecific groups remaining within the Procyonidge, when based chiefly on dental characteristics, fall into as weU-ordered a sequence of steps, connecting the Old-World Ailurus with the American Potos, as it would seem possible to find among living animals. (Plate 39.) The one seemingly aberrant cranial feature in Ailurus,^ the presence of the aUsphenoid canal, can not in tliis case be considered a character of family or subfamily importance. The alisphenoid canal in other famiUes of carnivores is known to be absent or present in different genera, in individuals of the same species, or even on the right and left side of the same individual. Of the American groups, Euprocyon is the nearest approach to Ailurus, but if the genera within the family are to be kept of fairly uniform value and degree of differen- tiation, Euprocyon is surely not more than a subgenus of Procyon.
    [Show full text]
  • An Educator's Resource to Texas Mammal Skulls and Skins
    E4H-014 11/17 An Educator’s Resource to Texas Mammal Skulls and Skins for use in 4-H Wildlife Programs and FFA Wildlife Career Development Events By, Denise Harmel-Garza Program Coordinator I, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service, 4-H Photographer and coauthor, Audrey Sepulveda M.Ed. Agricultural Leadership, Education and Communications, Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 2017 “A special thanks to the Biodiversity Research and Teaching Collections at Texas A&M University for providing access to their specimens.” Texas A&M AgriLife Extension provides equal opportunities in its programs and employment to all persons, regardless of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, genetic information, veteran status, sexual orientation, or gender identity. The Texas A&M University System, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the County Commissioners Courts of Texas Cooperating. Introduction Texas youth that participate in wildlife programs may be asked to identify a skull, skin, scat, tracks, etc. of an animal. Usually, educators must find this information and assemble pictures of skulls and skins from various sources. They also must ensure that what they find is relevant and accurate. Buying skulls and skins to represent all Texas mammals is costly. Most educators cannot afford them, and if they can, maintaining these collections over time is problematic. This study resource will reduce the time teachers across the state need to spend searching for information and allow them more time for presenting the material to their students. This identification guide gives teachers and students easy access to information that is accurate and valuable for learning to identify Texas mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions to Mammals Killed by Motor Vehicles on Vía Del Escobero, Envigado
    Revista EIA, ISSN 1794-1237 / Year XI / Volume 11 / Issue N.22 / July-December 2014 / pp. 137-142 Technical-scientific biannual publication / Escuela de Ingeniería de Antioquia —EIA—, Envigado (Colombia) ADDITIONS TO MAMMALS KILLED BY MOTOR VEHICLES ON VÍA DEL ESCOBERO, ENVIGADO CARLOS A. DELGADO-V. 1 ABSTRACT Vertebrate road kills are a generalized problem around the world, but they are scarcely documented on Colombian highways, especially in peri-urban areas. This study describes the highway mortality of mammals in a six year-period (2008-2013) on Vía del Escobero (Envigado, Antioquia, Colombia). Mammal groups that presented the highest mortality rates were marsupials (54.3%), carnivores (25.7%), and rodents (17.5%). Although there was a lower diversity and fewer individual fatalities than in previous years for the same highway, this study reports a greater number of fatalities for some endangered and unknown species such as Leopardus tigrinus, Puma yag- ouaroundi, and Bassaricyon neblina. This study also added three new species to the road kill list on this highway. KEYWORDS: Road ecology, urban ecology, Medellín, Valle de Aburrá, Valle de San Nicolás ADICIONES AL ATROPELLAMIENTO VEHICULAR DE MAMÍFEROS EN LA VÍA DE EL ESCOBERO, ENVIGADO (ANTIOQUIA), COLOMBIA RESUMEN El atropellamiento vehicular de fauna es un problema generalizado alrededor del Mundo pero escasamente estudiado en las carreteras colombianas, especialmente en áreas periurbanas. Aquí se describe la mortalidad de mamíferos entre los años 2008 a 2013 en la vía El Escobero (Envigado, Antioquia). Los mamíferos más atropella- dos en este periodo fueron los marsupiales (54.3 %), los carnívoros (25.7 %) y los roedores (17.5 %).
    [Show full text]
  • Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus Arctos and U
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus Benjamin James Hillesheim East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Evolution Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Hillesheim, Benjamin James, "Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3261. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3261 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus ____________________________________ A thesis presented to the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences ____________________________________ by Benjamin Hillesheim May 2017 ____________________________________ Dr. Blaine W. Schubert, Chair Dr. Steven C. Wallace Dr. Josh X. Samuels Keywords: Ursidae, Geometric morphometrics, Ursus americanus, Ursus arctos, Last Glacial Maximum ABSTRACT Cranial Morphological Distinctiveness Between Ursus arctos and U. americanus by Benjamin J. Hillesheim Despite being separated by millions of years of evolution, black bears (Ursus americanus) and brown bears (Ursus arctos) can be difficult to distinguish based on skeletal and dental material alone. Complicating matters, some Late Pleistocene U. americanus are significantly larger in size than their modern relatives, obscuring the identification of the two bears.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Distribution, Status, and Research Priorities of Little-Known Small Carnivores in Brazil
    Notes on the distribution, status, and research priorities of little-known small carnivores in Brazil Tadeu G. de OLIVEIRA Abstract Ten species of small carnivores occur in Brazil, including four procyonids, four mustelids (excluding otters), and two mephitids. On the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species eight are assessed as Least Concern and two as Data Deficient. The state of knowledge of small carnivores is low compared to other carnivores: they are among the least known of all mammals in Brazil. The current delineation of Bassaricyon and Galictis congeners appears suspect and not based on credible information. Research needs include understanding dis- tributions, ecology and significant evolutionary units, with emphasis on theAmazon Weasel Mustela africana. Keywords: Amazon weasel, Data Deficient, Olingo, Crab-eating Raccoon, Hog-nosed Skunk Notas sobre la distribución, estado y prioridades de investigación de los pequeños carnívoros de Brasil Resumen En Brasil ocurren diez especies de pequeños carnívoros, incluyendo cuatro prociónidos, cuatro mustélidos (excluyendo nutrias) y dos mephitidos. De acuerdo a la Lista Roja de Especies Amenazadas de la UICN, ocho especies son evaluadas como de Baja Preocupación (LC) y dos son consideradas Deficientes de Datos (DD). El estado de conocimiento de los pequeños carnívoros es bajo comparado con otros carnívoros y se encuentran entre los mamíferos menos conocidos de Brasil. La delineación congenérica actual de Bassaricyon y Galictis parece sospechosa y no basada en información confiable. Las necesidades de investigación incluyen el entendimiento de las distribuciones, ecología y unidades evolutivas significativas, con énfasis en la ComadrejaAmazónica Mustela africana. Palabras clave: Comadreja Amazónica, Deficiente de Datos, Mapache Cangrejero, Olingo, Zorrillo Introduction 1999), but recently has been recognised (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Jaguar Diet in the Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary, Belize1
    BIOTROPICA 38(5): 687–690 2006 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2006.00190.x Cockscomb Revisited: Jaguar Diet in the Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary, Belize1 Mark Weckel2 Fordham University, Bronx, New York 10458, U.S.A. William Giuliano University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, U.S.A. and Scott Silver Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York 10460, U.S.A. ABSTRACT The Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary, Belize was established in 1986 following Rabinowitz and Nottingham’s 1986 study on jaguar diet and distribution. In 2002, we reexamined jaguar diet following two decades of mitigated human hunting of jaguar prey. We observed high overlap between historical and current jaguar diet constructs. Nine-banded armadillo remained the most frequently consumed prey item. However, collared peccary consumption increased by nearly20percent while dietary breadth decreased by 60 percent presumably reflecting increased prey availability following reduced human hunting pressure. Key words: Belize; Dasypus novemcinctus;diet;Panthera onca; Tayassu tajacu; tropical moist forest. RABINOWITZ AND NOTTINGHAM’S (1986) INVESTIGATION OF JAGUAR the Belize Audubon Society (BAS) failed to document evidence DIET in the then unprotected Cockscomb Basin, Belize, Central of humans hunting jaguar prey in Guam Bank; however, subsis- America, characterized the local population as opportunistic preda- tence hunters inhabiting villages on the CBWS periphery estab- tors, consuming primary prey items, armadillo (Dasypus novem- lished hunting routes and encampments to the south and west of cinctus), and paca (Agouti paca), relative to availability. The study the Guam Bank study area (Weckel 2005). incited the Belize government to create what is now the Cockscomb We constructed jaguar diet from scats collected from 1 June Basin Wildlife Sanctuary (CBWS) effectively prohibiting hunting to 24 November 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Coatimundi (Nasua Nasua)
    www.nonnativespecies.org For definitive identification, contact: [email protected] Coatimundi (Nasua nasua) Synonyms: - Coatis, Ring-tailed Coati, Coatis-mondis, Cwatimwndi (Welsh) Native to: South America Consignments likely to come from: unknown Identification difficulty : Easy Identification information: The coatimundi is similar in size to a small dog, weighing up to 5.5 kg and the head-to-tail length ranging from 80 to 130 cm with a little more than half the length being tail. It has short forelegs, long hind legs, black feet, a pointed snout with black fa- cial markings and a distinctive long, banded tail. It has a harsh red-brown and black coat which light- ens to yellow-brown on the underparts. Coatimundi walk with a bear-like gait. Key ID Features Banded tail, usually carried erect with Reddish-brown curled tip and black coat Black facial marking with white on chin and throat Black paws Long, pointed muzzle * * Coati swarm by j / f / photos, Creative Common BY-ND http://www.flickr.com/photos/good-karma/401110526/sizes/o/ Similar species Nasua nasua may be confused with other medium sized mammals but can be distinguished by its distinctive coat and tail. Coatimundi Nasua nasua) For comparison Coati by Olivier Duquesne, Creative Common BY-SA http://www.flickr.com/photos/daffyduke/3644277763/sizes/o/ Raccoon Distinctive dark Badger Body length Short tail with non-native eye patches Native 75 - 90 cm white tip (Procyon lotor) (Meles meles) Low to ground, short limbs No bands Body length on tail 40 - 70 cm Fur is grey Thick furry to black Black and white ringed tail face markings Red Fox Ears erect Native and pointed Red-brown (Vulpes vulpes) with black in colour backs Even length fore and hind limbs Tail long, thick and bushy, with no bands White and red face with pointed white muzzle Body length 90 - 120 cm Photos from: Ruthanne Annaloro, Danial Winchester, j / f / photos, Olivier Duquesne .
    [Show full text]