The Effect of Age and Recycling on Paper Quality
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 4-1996 The Effect of Age and Recycling on Paper Quality Zhuang Wu Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Wood Science and Pulp, Paper Technology Commons Recommended Citation Wu, Zhuang, "The Effect of Age and Recycling on Paper Quality" (1996). Master's Theses. 4921. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/4921 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECT OF AGE AND RECYCLING ON PAPER QUALITY by Zhuang Wu A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Paper and Printing Science and Engineering Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan April 1996 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I extend my sincere appreciation to the members of my committee, Dr. Raja Aravamuthan, Dr. David Peterson and Dr. Ellsworth Shriver for their guidance and support throughout the course of this work. I wish to thank Mr. Rick Reames for his suggestions and help. Many thanks are due to my friends, colleagues and others who contributed in different ways. Finally, I am also pleased to acknowledge my family members for their financial and other support in finishing my study. Zhuang Wu ii THE EFFECT OF AGE AND RECYCLING ON PAPER QUALITY Zhuang Wu, M.S. Western Michigan University, 1996 The effects of recycling paper that has undergone aging for different periods on paper and fiber proper ties like strength, weighted average fiber length, and water retention value were investigated in this study. Old Newspapers (ONP) with different periods of natural aging (between 1 to 10 months) were recycled repeatedly for up to six times. Another goal was the study of aging effects on paper properties using accelerated aging at high temperatures (105±2) °C. Four different aging times (24, 48, 72, and 144 hours) were employed. The results showed that naturally aged ONP loses little in strength properties up to 7 months; later, there is a significant decrease. The accelerated aging tests showed strength loses for all aging periods. The water retention value decreases with increasing aging time and number of repeated recycling. The age of the recycled paper is found to be a more important variable than the number of times that the paper has been recy cled. It is also found that 10 months of natural aging is equivalent to less than 24 hours of accelerated aging under the experimental conditions. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS......................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ...........................................vi LIST OF FIGURES .........................................vii CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ........................................1 II. REVIEW OF LITERATURE................................ 6 Properties of Secondary Fibers ................. 6 The Effects of Recycling on Paper Quality .....7 General Effects of Recycling ................ 7 The Recycle Potential of Pulp ............... 9 Recycling Methods .......................... 14 Strength Properties ........................ 15 Wood Species ............................... 18 Deinking and Bleaching ........................19 Improving the Strength of Recycled Fiber ......21 Analysis of the Literature ....................22 III. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM .........................24 IV. OBJECTIVES OF THIS STUDY .•.......................26 V. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY ..............28 Experimental Design........................... 27 iii Table of Contents-Continued CHAPTER Experimental Methods ........................... 30 The Recycling Procedure .................... 30 Properties of Handsheets and Fibers ........ 32 VI. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .......................... 34 Experimental Data Analysis.................... 34 Discussion .................................... 35 Effect of Recycling on Fines............... 35 Effect of Recycling on Fiber Length ........ 37 Effect of Aging and Recycling on Zero-span Strength......................... 39 Effect of Aging and Recycling on Tensile Strength........................... 42 Effect of Aging and Recycling on Burst Strength............................... 47 Effect of Aging and Recycling on Tear Strength ................................51 Effect of Aging and Recycling on Water Retention Value ........................54 Effect of Aging and Recycling on Scattering Coefficient .......................58 Comparison of Natural Aging versus Accelerated Aging ............................61 VII . CONCLUSIONS........................................ 63 VIII. SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDY ......................66 iv Table of Contents-Continued APPENDIX A. Regression Model Parameters......................... 67 REFERENCES •.•....••••••••..•••.•••••••...••...........• 7 0 V LIST OF TABLES 1. Newsprint Properties Before and After Calendering ....................................... 14 2. Handsheet Testing Methods .......................... 33 3 . Fines Percentage.................................. 3 6 4. Weighted Averaged Fiber Length.................... 38 5. Zero Span Fiber Strength ..........................40 6. Tensile Strength.................................. 43 7. Burst Strength.................................... 48 8. Tear Strength..................................... 52 9. Water Retention Value .......................... � ..55 vi LIST OF FIGURES 1. u. s. Paper Recovery Rate............................. 2 2. Effect of Recycling on Fibre Saturation Point........ 8 3. Effect of Recycling on Fibre Flexibility............ 10 4. Effect of Recycling on Breaking Length .............. 16 5. Effect of Recycling on Tear Index................... 18 6. Effect of Recycling on Burst Index.................. 18 7. Schematic for Natural Aging Experiments............. 28 8. Schematic for Accelerated Aging Experiments......... 29 9. Effect of Recycling on Fines........................ 36 10. Effect of Recycling on Weighted Average Fiber Length ............................................ 3 8 11. Effect of Recycling and Natural Aging on Fiber Strength ....................................41 12. Effect of Recycling and Accelerated Aging on Fiber Strength......... , ..........................41 13. Effect of Recycling and Natural Aging on Tensile Index..................................... 4 4 14. Effect of Recycling and Accelerated Aging on Tensile Index..................................... 44 15. Effect of Recycling and Natural Aging on Burst Index .......................................49 16. Effect of Recycling and Accelerated Aging on Burst Index....................................... 49 vii List of Figures-Continued 17. Effect of Recycling and Natural Aging on Tear Index ........................................ 53 18. Effect of Recycling and Accelerated Aging on Tear Index ........................................ 53 19. Effect of Recycling and Natural Aging on Water Retention Value............................. 56 20. Effect of Recycling and Accelerated Aging on Water Retention Value ............................. 56 21. Effect of Recycling and Natural Aging on Scattering Coefficient............................ 59 22. Effect of Recycling on Density.................... 60 23. Effect of Recycling and Accelerated Aging Scattering Coefficient............................ 60 24. Comparison of Natural Aging Versus Accelerated Aging................................. 62 viii ; CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Recycled fibers (secondary fibers) are defined as fi bers that have been through at least one papermaking cycle. Recycled fibers have lower strength and higher drainage re sistance than virgin fibers. The mechanical properties of fibers as well their ability to swell are diminished after they are exposed to the pulping and drying conditions im posed during the papermaking cycle. Recycling is not a new technology. It became a commer cial proposition when Matthias Koops established the Neck inger Mill, UK, in 1800 [1]. Since 1968, when the use of waste paper as a fiber source for papermaking was at a low point at 19.5% of total fiber sources and 10.2 million tons, waste paper has become progressively more important as a fiber resource in papermaking. The recovery rate for waste paper has increased steadily throughout the 1970s and 1980s. This trend is expected to continue at least to the end of the century (Figure 1). Paper recycling is unusual among the technology of the pulp and paper industry in that its practice is perceived to be both economically and envi- 1 / 2 ronrnentally beneficial. The incentive for recycling appears 50 45 40 � 35 GI a:: 30 GI 25 20 GI a:: 15 10 5 0 1985 1990 1993 2000goal *Note: Actual data for 1985 and 1990; projected data for 1993 and 2000. *Sources: American Forest and Paper Association/Franklin Associates ,Ltd. Figure 1. U.S. Paper Recovery Rate[2]. to be related in an inverse way to the availability of vir gin fiber resources, although various other factors are in volved. As forest area per person is being decreased, the recovery of fiber is more and more important. For 1990-1991 the utilization rate (the amount of recovered fiber used in the manufacture of paper, expressed as a percentage of the total fiber used) is a respectable 44.6%[3]. Annual consumption