DOCSLIB.ORG

OH 833 KANCK, Sandra [USE COPY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA J. D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION OH 833 Edited transcript of an interview with SANDRA KANCK on 26 October 2007 By Alison McDougall For the EMINENT AUSTRALIANS ORAL HISTORY PROJECT Recording available on CD Access for research: Unrestricted Right to photocopy: Copies may be made for research and study Right to quote or publish: Publication only with written permission from the State Library 1 OH 833 SANDRA KANCK NOTES TO THE TRANSCRIPT This transcript was created by the J. D. Somerville Oral History Collection of the State Library. It conforms to the Somerville Collection's policies for transcription which are explained below. Readers of this oral history transcript should bear in mind that it is a record of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The State Library is not responsible for the factual accuracy of the interview, nor for the views expressed therein. As with any historical source, these are for the reader to judge. It is the Somerville Collection's policy to produce a transcript that is, so far as possible, a verbatim transcript that preserves the interviewee's manner of speaking and the conversational style of the interview. Certain conventions of transcription have been applied (ie. the omission of meaningless noises, false starts and a percentage of the interviewee's crutch words). Where the interviewee has had the opportunity to read the transcript, their suggested alterations have been incorporated in the text (see below). On the whole, the document can be regarded as a raw transcript. Abbreviations: The interviewee’s alterations may be identified by their initials in insertions in the transcript. Punctuation: Square bracket [ ] indicate material in the transcript that does not occur on the original tape recording. This is usually words, phrases or sentences which the interviewee has inserted to clarify or correct meaning. These are not necessarily differentiated from insertions the interviewer or by Somerville Collection staff which are either minor (a linking word for clarification) or clearly editorial. Relatively insignificant word substitutions or additions by the interviewee as well as minor deletions of words or phrases are often not indicated in the interest of readability. Extensive additional material supplied by the interviewee is usually placed in footnotes at the bottom of the relevant page rather than in square brackets within the text. A series of dots, .... .... .... .... indicates an untranscribable word or phrase. Sentences that were left unfinished in the normal manner of conversation are shown ending in three dashes, - - -. Spelling: Wherever possible the spelling of proper names and unusual terms has been verified. A parenthesised question mark (?) indicates a word that it has not been possible to verify to date. Typeface: The interviewer's questions are shown in bold print. Discrepancies between transcript and tape: This proofread transcript represents the authoritative version of this oral history interview. Researchers using the original tape recording of this interview are cautioned to check this transcript for corrections, additions or deletions which have been made by the interviewer or the interviewee but which will not occur on the tape. See the Punctuation section above.) Minor discrepancies of grammar and sentence structure made in the interest of readability can be ignored but significant changes such as deletion of information or correction of fact should be, respectively, duplicated or acknowledged when the tape recorded version of this interview is used for broadcast or any other form of audio publication. 2 J.D. SOMERVILLE ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION, STATE LIBRARY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA: INTERVIEW NO. OH 833 Interview with the Honourable Sandra Kanck conducted by Alison McDougall on 26th October 2007 for the Eminent Australians Oral History project of the National Library of Australia and the State Library of South Australia. DISK 1 This is compact flash card one of an interview with the Honourable Sandra Kanck. Sandra has followed a distinguished career in politics and related fields, and is currently the leader of the Democrats in South Australia and a member of the Legislative Council. Sandra will be speaking with me, Alison McDougall, for the Eminent Australians Oral History Project conducted by the National Library of Australia and the State Library of South Australia. On behalf of the Director-General of the National Library and the Director of the State Library of South Australia, I would like to thank you for agreeing to participate in this program. Sandra, do you understand that copyright is shared by you and the libraries? I do. This being so, may we have your permission to make a transcript of this recording should the libraries decide to make one? Most certainly. We hope you will speak as frankly as possible, knowing that neither the tapes nor any transcripts produced from them will be released without your authority. Yes. This interview is taking place today, Friday, 26th October 2007, at the State Library of South Australia, Adelaide. Now, can we begin with your full name plus your date and place of birth. Okay. Full name is Sandra Myrtho Kanck, born in Broken Hill Base Hospital on 20th April 1950. Can you explain the origin of ‘Myrtho’? Not really; it was my grandmother’s name. When I was at high school somebody showed me a French poem, which referred to Myrtho as being some sort of deity or something, perhaps Greek, because just past Renmark there is a little town of Murtho 3 – spelt differently to mine, mine’s M-Y-R-T-H-O and the Greek spelling for this little Greek settlement beyond Renmark is M-U-R-T-H-O – so it’s all a great mystery. And what was your maiden name? Well, it’s Swedish in origin. We pronounced it ‘Cedarblade’, but I understand its pronunciation in Swedish may have been ‘Kedderblood’. And do you have Swedish parents or – – –? Both my parents were born in Australia but antecedents are Swedish, German, English and Cornish, although the English has got a fair bit of German in it, as I understand my great-great-grandfather was a deserter from the Prussian army and fled across to (laughs) England eventually. Now, how did your family come to be in Broken Hill? Well, if I go back to my Swedish grandfather, he was a seaman and jumped ship at Port Adelaide and moved as fast inland as he possibly could, so I’ve got an illegal immigrant background (laughs) – I’m proud to say – and he got to Burra, which was a mining town, and found that he had a career ahead of him as what they used to call in the mines in Broken Hill as being part of a ‘sailor gang’. The sailor gang were the people that were responsible for lowering horses up and down into the pits, and to do that you needed to be able to tie knots that wouldn’t come undone when the horse was being put down in the pits or taken up from the pits, and as a seaman, of course, he was an expert on ropes and knots and so on. So he then went from the Burra mine to I think Thackaringa up to White Cliffs and eventually to Broken Hill. And I think while he was at White Cliffs he met my great-great-grandfather – no, one ‘great’, I think – by the name of Prenzel and he told my grandfather that he had a single daughter and thought it might be worthwhile for him to consider marrying her. So it was virtually an arranged marriage, I don’t know that she got much say in it. So that was where the German came from, because Prenzel was German, and they met up there at White Cliffs and so – I think he, Prenzel, lived in Broken Hill and so he invited my grandfather, Carl Cederblad, back to Broken Hill and that’s how the Broken Hill connection started. 4 On my mother’s side, her father was a Methodist minister and was transferred to Broken Hill and that’s where she met my father. And her surname was – – –? Guthberlet. And what was your father’s first name? William. William Hilding Cederblad, the Hilding being a German name, I understand, or it could have been Swedish, but anyhow they kept that somewhat Germanic–Scandinavian link going with most of the names of their children (laughs). And what job did your father have with the mine? He was an electrical fitter on the Zinc Mine, and was all his life basically and, you know, most people then didn’t travel very far and so on and an electrical fitter was a reasonable job – I guess it was working class but it was educated working class, and it gave a reliable income and he was there until he took early retirement – when was that? – about 1984, I think, that he took slightly early retirement of a couple of years, because they were starting to reduce numbers on the mines and encouraging people to go early. So he retired and he and my mother moved down to Adelaide at that point. And did your mother work outside the home? No; in Broken Hill that wasn’t allowed. The mining unions in Broken Hill had a policy that married women could not hold down jobs unless there was no-one else who could do it, and this was a sort of a ploy, I suppose, to make sure that – this was a time when labour was really, really crucial in the industry, and this ensured that if there was a supply of women willing to be wives, this also ensured then that there was a supply of labour from the men.
Recommended publications
  • Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia

    Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia

    Abortion, Homosexuality and the Slippery Slope: Legislating ‘Moral’ Behaviour in South Australia Clare Parker BMusSt, BA(Hons) A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, Discipline of History, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Adelaide. August 2013 ii Contents Contents ii Abstract iv Declaration vi Acknowledgements vii List of Abbreviations ix List of Figures x A Note on Terms xi Introduction 1 Chapter 1: ‘The Practice of Sound Morality’ 21 Policing Abortion and Homosexuality 24 Public Conversation 36 The Wowser State 44 Chapter 2: A Path to Abortion Law Reform 56 The 1930s: Doctors, Court Cases and Activism 57 World War II 65 The Effects of Thalidomide 70 Reform in Britain: A Seven Month Catalyst for South Australia 79 Chapter 3: The Abortion Debates 87 The Medical Profession 90 The Churches 94 Activism 102 Public Opinion and the Media 112 The Parliamentary Debates 118 Voting Patterns 129 iii Chapter 4: A Path to Homosexual Law Reform 139 Professional Publications and Prohibited Literature 140 Homosexual Visibility in Australia 150 The Death of Dr Duncan 160 Chapter 5: The Homosexuality Debates 166 Activism 167 The Churches and the Medical Profession 179 The Media and Public Opinion 185 The Parliamentary Debates 190 1973 to 1975 206 Conclusion 211 Moral Law Reform and the Public Interest 211 Progressive Reform in South Australia 220 The Slippery Slope 230 Bibliography 232 iv Abstract This thesis examines the circumstances that permitted South Australia’s pioneering legalisation of abortion and male homosexual acts in 1969 and 1972. It asks how and why, at that time in South Australian history, the state’s parliament was willing and able to relax controls over behaviours that were traditionally considered immoral.
  • Australian Democrats.[1]

    Australian Democrats.[1]

    CHIPP, Donald Leslie (1925–2006)Senator, Victoria, 1978–86 (Austral... http://biography.senate.gov.au/chipp-donald-leslie/ http://biography.senate.gov.au/chipp-donald-leslie/ Don Chipp's Senate career almost never happened. Dropped from Malcolm Fraser's Liberal Party ministry in December 1975, he turned this career blow into an opportunity to fight for the causes in which he believed. The result of Chipp's personal and political upheaval was the creation of a third force in Australian politics, the Australian Democrats.[1] Donald Leslie Chipp was born in Melbourne on 21 August 1925, the first child of Leslie Travancore Chipp and his wife Jessie Sarah, née McLeod. Don's father Les was a fitter and turner who later became a foreman. With Les in regular employment during the 1930s, the Chipp family was cushioned from some of the harsher aspects of the Depression years. However, the economic downturn must have had some impact, because Don remembered his father saying to his four boys that 'When you all grow up, I want you to be wearing white collars. White collars, that's what you should aim at'. Chipp matriculated from Northcote High School at the age of fifteen, then worked as a clerk for the State Electricity Commission (SEC). He also began studying part-time for a Bachelor of Commerce at the University of Melbourne. In 1943, at age eighteen, he joined the Royal Australian Air Force, and spent much of the last two years of the Second World War undergoing pilot training within Australia. Discharged as a Leading Aircraftman in September 1945, Chipp took advantage of the Commonwealth Reconstruction Training Scheme which provided ex-service personnel with subsidised tuition and living allowances.
  • Australian Electoral Systems

    Australian Electoral Systems

    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library Information, analysis and advice for the Parliament RESEARCH PAPER www.aph.gov.au/library 21 August 2007, no. 5, 2007–08, ISSN 1834-9854 Australian electoral systems Scott Bennett and Rob Lundie Politics and Public Administration Section Executive summary The Australian electorate has experienced three types of voting system—First Past the Post, Preferential Voting and Proportional Representation (Single Transferable Vote). First Past the Post was used for the first Australian parliamentary elections held in 1843 for the New South Wales Legislative Council and for most colonial elections during the second half of the nineteenth century. Since then there have been alterations to the various electoral systems in use around the country. These alterations have been motivated by three factors: a desire to find the ‘perfect’ system, to gain political advantage, or by the need to deal with faulty electoral system arrangements. Today, two variants of Preferential Voting and two variants of Proportional Representation are used for all Australian parliamentary elections. This paper has two primary concerns: firstly, explaining in detail the way each operates, the nature of the ballot paper and how the votes are counted; and secondly, the political consequences of the use of each system. Appendix 1 gives examples of other Australian models used over the years and Appendix 2 lists those currently in use in Commonwealth elections as well as in the states and territories. y Under ‘Full’ Preferential Voting each candidate must be given a preference by the voter. This system favours the major parties; can sometimes award an election to the party that wins fewer votes than its major opponent; usually awards the party with the largest number of votes a disproportionate number of seats; and occasionally gives benefits to the parties that manufacture a ‘three-cornered contest’ in a particular seat.
  • The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett*

    The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett*

    Australian Cultural History Vol. 27, No.2, October 2009, 187-193 The Australian Democrats Andrew Bartlett* The Australian Democrats had maintained a presence in the Senate since 1977, but the 2007 election threatened to end their representation for good. Their efforts to retain seats proved to be in vain. Keywords: 2007 election; Australian Democrats; Senate Following on from the 2004 election, where the Australian Democrats lost four seats (including the Democrat seat Meg Lees had taken with her when she resigned from the party in 2002), plus official parliamentary status and balance of power in the Senate, the Party faced a very difficult task in the 2007 election trying to keep its four remaining Senate seats. Right throughout John Howard's fourth term, opinion polls showed public support for the Democrats consistently scraping along rock bottom levels of 1 or 2 per cent, as they had ever since the Lees resignation and the related public implosion of Natasha Stott Despoja's leadership in 2002. Even though the removal of the Democrats from the balance of power after the 2004 poll led directly to the Coalition government gaining control of the Senate, where it frequently used its majority to stifle scrutiny and bulldoze through some controversial legislation, the Democrats were unable to use this situation to build public support for returning the Party to its traditional Senate watchdog position. The Party had avoided going into debt in its 2004 campaign, so there were sufficient funds to run a basic campaign in priority areas for the 2007 election. However, serious use of paid advertising was not feasible.
  • Women in the Federal Parliament

    Women in the Federal Parliament

    PAPERS ON PARLIAMENT Number 17 September 1992 Trust the Women Women in the Federal Parliament Published and Printed by the Department of the Senate Parliament House, Canberra ISSN 1031-976X Papers on Parliament is edited and managed by the Research Section, Senate Department. All inquiries should be made to: The Director of Research Procedure Office Senate Department Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Telephone: (06) 277 3061 The Department of the Senate acknowledges the assistance of the Department of the Parliamentary Reporting Staff. First published 1992 Reprinted 1993 Cover design: Conroy + Donovan, Canberra Note This issue of Papers on Parliament brings together a collection of papers given during the first half of 1992 as part of the Senate Department's Occasional Lecture series and in conjunction with an exhibition on the history of women in the federal Parliament, entitled, Trust the Women. Also included in this issue is the address given by Senator Patricia Giles at the opening of the Trust the Women exhibition which took place on 27 February 1992. The exhibition was held in the public area at Parliament House, Canberra and will remain in place until the end of June 1993. Senator Patricia Giles has represented the Australian Labor Party for Western Australia since 1980 having served on numerous Senate committees as well as having been an inaugural member of the World Women Parliamentarians for Peace and, at one time, its President. Dr Marian Sawer is Senior Lecturer in Political Science at the University of Canberra, and has written widely on women in Australian society, including, with Marian Simms, A Woman's Place: Women and Politics in Australia.
  • 1 Parliamentary Privilege and the Common Law of Parliament

    1 Parliamentary Privilege and the Common Law of Parliament

    Parliamentary privilege and the common law of parliament: can MP’s say what they want and get away with it? Carren Walker1 Introduction Parliamentary privilege can be broadly defined as the powers, rights and immunities of parliament and its members. The privileges enjoyed by the parliament are linked historically to the privileges of the UK House of Commons which have their origin in the procedures of the Parliament of Westminster: ..to be found chiefly in ancient practice, asserted by Parliament and accepted over time by the Crown and the courts of law and custom of Parliament.2 The privileges of parliament are defined by the rulings of each House in respect of its own practices and procedures when a matter of privilege arises. The use of the terms ‘history’, ‘procedure’, and ‘tradition’ give the impression of uncertainty, and make those in the legal profession feel most uneasy. The legal world is inhibited by statute, rules, forms and precedent, surrounded by the cocoon of the common law as developed by the courts. Parliamentary privilege and the development of the common law of parliament is based on different principles to those of the common law as developed by the courts. It certainly bears little resemblance in its form and structure to legal professional privilege. The privileges of parliament have changed over time, some are simply not relevant in our modern parliamentary democracy (such as freedom of members from arrest), others (such as the power to detain a person in breach of the privilege) have fallen out of use. These privileges tend to develop as the need arises in a particular House.
  • South Australian Government Gazette

    South Australian Government Gazette

    No. 172 2951 THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ALL PUBLIC ACTS appearing in this GAZETTE are to be considered official, and obeyed as such ADELAIDE, THURSDAY, 2 DECEMBER 1999 CONTENTS Page Page Acts Assented To...................................................................................................................2952 REGULATIONS Associations Incorporation Act 1985¾Notice...................................................................2952 National Electricity (South Australia) Act 1996 Corporations and District Councils—Notices.......................................................................3087 (No. 246 of 1999)........................................................................................................3076 Corporations Law Rules 2000¾Notice...............................................................................3010 Public Corporations Act 1993¾ Fisheries Act 1982—Notices.................................................................................................2952 (No. 247 of 1999)........................................................................................................3079 Gaming Machines Act 1992—Notice..................................................................................2995 (No. 248 of 1999)........................................................................................................3081 Geographical Names Act 1991¾Notice............................................................................2995 (No. 249 of 1999)........................................................................................................3083
  • 1999 014.Pdf

    1999 014.Pdf

    No. 14 585 THE SOUTH AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY ALL PUBLIC ACTS appearing in this GAZETTE are to be considered official, and obeyed as such ADELAIDE, THURSDAY, 28 JANUARY 1999 CONTENTS Page Page Appointments, Resignations, Etc............................................586 Motor Vehicles Act 1959—Notice......................................... 613 Commercial Motor Vehicles (Hours of Driving) National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972—Notices..................... 617 Act 1973¾Notice...............................................................586 Private Advertisements.......................................................... 647 Corporations and District Councils—Notices ..........................645 Proclamations........................................................................ 587 Crown Lands Act 1929—Notices............................................586 Public Trustee Office—Administration of Estates .................. 646 Dental Board of South Australia—Register..............................588 Racing Act 1976—Rules......................................................... 619 Gaming Machines Act 1992—Notices.....................................609 REGULATION Geographical Names Act 1991¾Notices.................................609 Legal Practitioners Act 1981 (No. 7 of 1999).................... 635 Land and Business (Sale and Conveyancing) Roads (Opening and Closing) Act 1991¾Notices................... 618 Act 1994—Notice...............................................................611 Rules of Court .......................................................................
  • Todd Farrell Thesis

    Todd Farrell Thesis

    The Australian Greens: Realignment Revisited in Australia Todd Farrell Submitted in fulfilment for the requirements of the Doctorate of Philosophy Swinburne University of Technology Faculty of Health, Arts and Design School of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities 2020 ii I declare that this thesis does not incorporate without acknowledgement any material previously submitted for a degree in any university or another educational institution and to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. iii ABSTRACT Scholars have traditionally characterised Australian politics as a stable two-party system that features high levels of partisan identity, robust democratic features and strong electoral institutions (Aitkin 1982; McAllister 2011). However, this characterisation masks substantial recent changes within the Australian party system. Growing dissatisfaction with major parties and shifting political values have altered the partisan contest, especially in the proportionally- represented Senate. This thesis re-examines partisan realignment as an explanation for party system change in Australia. It draws on realignment theory to argue that the emergence and sustained success of the Greens represents a fundamental shift in the Australian party system. Drawing from Australian and international studies on realignment and party system reform, the thesis combines an historical institutionalist analysis of the Australian party system with multiple empirical measurements of Greens partisan and voter support. The historical institutionalist approach demonstrates how the combination of subnational voting mechanisms, distinctly postmaterialist social issues, federal electoral strategy and a weakened Labor party have driven a realignment on the centre-left of Australian politics substantial enough to transform the Senate party system.
  • Independent Review of Reporting Procedures for the Sa Uranium Mining Industry

    Independent Review of Reporting Procedures for the Sa Uranium Mining Industry

    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF REPORTING PROCEDURES FOR THE SA URANIUM MINING INDUSTRY Hedley Bachmann August 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REPORT ........................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................ 2 TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR INDEPENDENT REVIEW................................................................................. 2 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................................................... 3 METHODOLOGY OF THE REVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 8 REVIEW OF CURRENT INCIDENT REPORTING PROCEDURES................................................................ 10 THE SEVERITY OF THE CONSEQUENCES AN INCIDENT MAY HAVE ON THE PUBLIC, EMPLOYEES AND ENVIRONMENT........................................................................................................................................................... 10 MECHANISMS FOR KEEPING THE COMMONWEALTH INFORMED.................................................................................... 13 THE CONCEPT OF ‘ONE WINDOW INTO GOVERNMENT’ TO SIMPLIFY REPORTING FOR MINE OPERATIONS .................. 14 TRANSPARENCY IN THE EFFECTIVE DISCLOSURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL INCIDENTS TO HELP THE COMMUNITY
  • Senate Brief No. 3

    Senate Brief No. 3

    No. 3 January 2021 Women in the Senate Women throughout Australia have had the right national Parliament (refer to the table on page 6). to vote in elections for the national Parliament for more than one hundred years. For all that time, There were limited opportunities to vote for women they have also had the right to sit in the before the end of the Second World War, as few Australian Parliament. women stood for election. Between 1903 and 1943 only 26 women in total nominated for election for Australia was the first country in the world to either house. give most women both the right to vote and the right to stand for Parliament when, in 1902, No woman was endorsed by a major party as a the federal Parliament passed legislation to candidate for the Senate before the beginning of the provide for a uniform franchise throughout the Second World War. Overwhelmingly dominated by Commonwealth. In spite of this early beginning, men, the established political parties saw men as it was 1943 before a woman was elected to the being more suited to advancing their political causes. Senate or the House of Representatives. As of It was thought that neither men nor women would September 2020, there are 46 women in the vote for female candidates. House of Representatives, and 39 of the 76 Many early feminists distrusted the established senators are women. parties, as formed by men and protective of men’s The Commonwealth Franchise Act 1902 stated interests. Those who presented themselves as that ‘all persons not under twenty-one years of age candidates did so as independents or on the tickets of whether male or female married or unmarried’ minor parties.
  • PRG 1618/Box 1/Folder 1: Family Memorabilia, Photos and Slides of Janine and Family, and a Drawing in Charcoal and Pencil on Paper of Janine Haines (PRG 1618/1/1/1)

    PRG 1618/Box 1/Folder 1: Family Memorabilia, Photos and Slides of Janine and Family, and a Drawing in Charcoal and Pencil on Paper of Janine Haines (PRG 1618/1/1/1)

    ______________________________________________________________________________ Haines, Janine PRG 1618 Papers of Janine Haines Box List ______________________________________________________________________________ PRG 1618/ box 1: PRG 1618/box 1/folder 1: Family memorabilia, photos and slides of Janine and family, and a drawing in charcoal and pencil on paper of Janine Haines (PRG 1618/1/1/1). To view additional photographs in this folder do an ARCHIVAL NUMBER search for PRG 1618/1/1/1, 5-6. Folder includes: ‘Adelaide Church Guardian’ April 1995 – front page ‘Politician speaks out at St Pauls’. Transcript 15 March 1990 ABC interview for ‘7.30 Report’ on AD [Australian Democrats] policy for Federal election. Paul Lyneham questions JH [Janine Haines]. Script ‘A Sort of Crusade’ undated but post 1990 16 Dec 1991. Jocelyn Scott’s cover letter for edited chapter to go into ‘Breaking Through’. Letter 13 Dec 91 from Harry Evans req memorabilia for exhibition ‘Women in the Federal Parliament’ to be opened 27 Feb 92. Ann Millar ref. Script Laura Whelan speaks to JH [Janine Haines] in Adelaide. No date, but mostly covers ‘Suffrage to Sufferance’ material. Undated letter and brief CV to Marilyn Waring. Includes mention of my exp of reviewing ‘Playing the State’ for Sept’s ABR. 1991 set of notes for Candidates Skills Training session to be held at 711 South Road 19 May. Some astute advice. PRG 1618/box 1/folder 2: ‘PAC Returns’ AM honours list NCW of SA note. PRG 1618/box 1/folder 3: Congratulatory letters. June 2001. PRG 1618/box 1/folder 4: Congratulatory letters, including those from Gough Whitlam, Phillip Adams, Mike Rann, Eric Neal, John Olsen and Bob Carr.