An Alternative to Pacifism? Feminism and Just-War Theory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Alternative to Pacifism? Feminism and Just-War Theory Hypatia, Inc. !"#!$%&'"(%)*&#%+#,(-).)/01#2&0)")/0#("3#45/%67('#89&+': !5%9+';/<=#>5-)"3(#4?#,&(-9 @&*)&A&3#A+'B;/<= C+5'-&=#D:E(%)(F#G+$?#HF#I+?#JF#2&0)")/0#("3#,&(-&#;CE')"KF#LHHM<F#EE?#LNJ6LOJ ,5P$)/9&3#P:=#Wiley#+"#P&9($.#+.#Hypatia, Inc. C%(P$&#Q@>=#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810175 . !--&//&3=#JJRSLRJSLT#LT=NU Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Hypatia, Inc. and Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hypatia. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:58:12 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions An Alternativeto Pacifism? Feminismand Just-War Theory LUCINDA J. PEACH Only rarelyhave feminist theorists addressed the adequacyof just-wartheory, a set of principlesdeveloped over hundreds of yearsto assessthe justice of goingto war and the moralityof conductin war. Recently,a few feministscholars have found just-wartheory inadequate, yet theirown counterproposals are also deficient. I assess feministcontributions to just-war theorizing and suggest ways of strengthening,rather thanabandoning, this moral approach to war. INTRODUCTION Womenhave traditionallybeen excludedfrom involvement in war.War has been consideredalmost exclusively a male enterprise:fought by men, with and againstother men, for male-definedpurposes and ends. Culturally,traditional ideasabout gender roles identifymen with warand soldiering,and women with peace and mothering. Women remain largelyabsent from ethical and policy debatesregarding when to go to war,how to fight a war,and whether resorting to war is morallyjustifiable. In recent years,several feminists have challenged this traditional genderizeddichotomy between war and peace, as well as the validity of the male-conceived theories that assessthe moralityof war.In this paper,I evaluate feminist criticismsof one of these male-generatedtheories, that of just-war.1 After having no discernibleimpact on foreignpolicy analysisof any armed conflict for many years,just-war theory suddenlygained national prominence and recognition in relation to the Persian Gulf War. The theory developed over many centuries in Christian theology and internationallaw into a set of criteriadesigned to determinewhen, and to what extent, limited participation in armedconflict maybe moral.Just-war theorists generally share with pacifists a basicpresumption opposing war as morallywrong (see Miller 1991, 117;Cady 1989). However,whereas pacifist perspectives share a firm belief that war is Hypatiavol. 9, no. 2 (Spring 1994) © by LucindaJ. Peach This content downloaded on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:58:12 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions LucindaJ. Peach 153 never a moral means to achieve potentially just goals, those subscribingto just-wartheory are open to being persuadedthat war may be morallyjustified in certain circumstances.Both of these positions contrast with the views of "warists"or "warrealists," who considermorality to be irrelevant,inapplicable, or ineffective in relation to war (see Cady 1989, xi-xii).2 In our gender-struc- tured society, warism has been the culturally dominant and presumptively correct view (see Cady 1989, chap. 1). There are undoubtedlymyriad problems with attemptingto generalizea "fem- inist perspective"about just-wartheory, given the varietyof differentfeminist perspectivesabout the moralityof war.Popular conception and actualpractice alike align women with peace and pacifism,not with a positionthat acceptswar as potentiallymoral. For example,women have been and continue to be more actively involved than men in peace movements.3Recent public opinion polls indicatethat women aremore oriented to peacefulresolution of disputesthan are men, reflectingan average15 to 20 percent"gender gap" on the issueof military involvement and the use of force (see Gallagher1993; Branscombeand Owen 1993;Baxter and Lansing1983, 56-57, 196).4Women's social protest movements have achievedsignificant political leverage from their identification as "naturally" more peacefulthan men, basedon their relationshipto childbearingand child- rearing(see Ruddick1989; Pierson 1988; Swerdlow 1989). But despite the historical and ideological alignmentsbetween women (and feminists) and peace, not all women, even feminist women, are pacifists.5 Political scientist Jean Bethke Elshtain,for instance, expresslydenies that she is a pacifist, arguing that some wars have been necessary and that it is not possible to transcend "collective violence in defense of the state" (Elshtain 1987, 257). Feminist theorist Sara Ruddickaligns herself more with pacifism, especially in denouncing just-wartheory for its legitimation of certain forms of violence. However, she argues that "threatenedpeoples [may] not have alternative nonviolent ways of protecting what they love and getting what they need" (Ruddick 1989, 139). Ruddickand Elshtainagree with St. Augus- tine, an early Christian Church Fatherwho is consideredto be the "founder" of just-wartheory within the Christian tradition (see Kehoe 1986, 156), that war may be an element necessaryto peace, rather than completely separate from it (Ruddick 1989, 137; Elshtain 1987, 253). Even those women who do characterizethemselves as pacifists may have radically diverse reasons for doing so, some of them drawing on just-war reasoning (see Cady 1989, chap. 4; Miller 1991, 104-05). Further, as Elshtain discusses, the notion of women's innate or natural orientation to peace and pacifism needs to be questioned as a product of a gender system that serves to maintain men as strong warriorsand women as weak and passive peacemakers, thereby perpetuating war rather than bringing peace. These factors suggest that a feminist appraisalof the just-wartheory is an importantcomponent of feminist theorizingabout war and peace. This content downloaded on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:58:12 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 154 Hypatia Only a few feminist scholarshave yet explicitly addressedjust-war theory. Nonetheless, there have been a few significant feminist critiques of various elements found in just-warthinking. Forexample, Elshtainand Ruddickhave both pointed to some specific deficiencies with traditionaljust-war thinking and have proposedalternative frameworksfor analyzingthe morality of war. In this article, I arguethat manyof the feministcriticisms that have been waged againsttraditional just-war theory are well taken.Notwithstanding the validity of these "deconstructive"efforts, however, to date no adequateconstructive feminist alternative has been proposed. Rather than reject and/or replace traditionaljust-war theory, I argue,feminist principles and insights can and should provide a much needed reconceptualizationand revitalizationof the applicationof just-warcriteria. I begin with a brief backgroundof just-wartheory, including three classic contrastingapproaches: those of Augustine, Reinhold Niebuhr,a mid-twenti- eth-century Protestanttheologian, and Michael Walzer,a contemporarysec- ular social and political theorist. Although by no means exhaustive of the complete spectrumof just-warideas, these three views do exemplify some of the more significant strands and influences, both theological and secular, historical and contemporary,of the tradition. I then discuss significant ways in which traditionaljust-war thinking is deficientfrom a feministperspective. I use Elshtain'sand Ruddick'salterative approachesto the moralityof war to illustratehow feministefforts to replacejust-war theory have been inadequatethus far.In the finalpart of the article,I outlinehow feministperspectives and insights can providea frameworkfor revitalizingthe applicationof just-wartheory. THE JUST-WARTRADITION The manyvariants of just-wartheory which have been developedover the past millenniumdiffer in the specificcriteria used to determinethe moralityof war (both in generaland in relationto particularconflicts), the burdenof evidence necessaryto satisfythose criteria,and the relation between criteriaand their relative weight.6Nonetheless, there is generalagreement that just-waranalysis entails two sets of criteria:one govering the moralityof goingto war (the jus ad bellum),the otherthe actualconduct ofwar (the jus in bello). There is alsosignificant agreementthat the jus ad bellumcriteria include some or all of the following: 1. a just cause (self-defenseor defense of others); 2. right authority(determination to go to war is made by the appropriate governing officials); 3. right intention (must be to reestablishpeace); 4. proportionality(between meansemployed in fightingand ends or goals to be achieved); This content downloaded on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:58:12 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions LucindaJ. Peach 155 5. relative justice (in acknowledging that no participant in war has absolutejustice on their side); 6. last resort (all other alternatives for conflict resolution have been exhausted); and 7. a reasonablehope for success. There is also substantialconsensus that the jus in bellocriteria require: 1. "discrimination"between combatants and noncombatants and the permissibilityof
Recommended publications
  • Nonviolence and Peace Psychology
    Nonviolence and Peace Psychology For other titles published in this series, go to www.springer.com/series/7298 Daniel M. Mayton II Nonviolence and Peace Psychology Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, Societal, and World Peace Daniel M. Mayton II Lewis-Clark State College Lewiston ID USA ISBN 978-0-387-89347-1 e-ISBN 978-0-387-89348-8 DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-89348-8 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2009922610 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009 All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013, USA), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use in this publication of trade names, trademarks, service marks, and similar terms, even if they are not identified as such, is not to be taken as an expression of opinion as to whether or not they are subject to proprietary rights. Printed on acid-free paper Springer is part of Springer Science+Business Media (www.springer.com) Foreword The UNESCO constitution, written in 1945, states, “Since wars begin in the minds of men, it is in the minds of men that the defenses of peace must be constructed.” This is an appeal for peace psychology. It is a call to understand the values, philoso- phies, and competencies needed to build and maintain intrapersonal, interpersonal, intergroup, and international peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Partment of Political Affairs - Security Council Affairs Division Security Council Practices and Charter Research Branch
    ADVANCE VERSION Repertoire of the Practice of the Security Council 20th Supplement 2016-2017 Department of Political Affairs - Security Council Affairs Division Security Council Practices and Charter Research Branch Part III Purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations Repertoire website: http://www.un.org/en/sc/repertoire Repertoire of the Practice of the Security Council ADVANCE VERSION 20th Supplement (2016 – 2017) Contents Introductory note ................................................................................................................. 2 I. The principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples under Article 1, paragraph 2.......................................................................................................................... 3 Note ..................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Decisions relating to Article 1 (2) .................................................................................. 3 B. Constitutional discussion relating to Article 1 (2) ......................................................... 5 C. Invocation of the principle enshrined in Article 1 (2) in other instances ....................... 6 II. Prohibition of the threat or use of force under Article 2, paragraph 4 ........................... 8 Note ..................................................................................................................................... 8 A. Decisions relating to Article
    [Show full text]
  • IS the WORLD on the ROAD to PEACE OR WAR? Hans Blix
    SIPRI Lecxture IS THE WORLD ON THE ROAD TO PEACE OR WAR? hans blix SIPRI Lecture 01 STOCKHOLM INTERNATIONAL PEACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE SIPRI is an independent international institute dedicated to research into conflict, armaments, arms control and disarmament. Established in 1966, SIPRI provides data, analysis and recommendations, based on open sources, to policymakers, researchers, media and the interested public. The Governing Board is not responsible for the views expressed in the publications of the Institute. GOVERNING BOARD Ambassador Jan Eliasson, Chair (Sweden) Dr Dewi Fortuna Anwar (Indonesia) Dr Vladimir Baranovsky (Russia) Ambassador Lakhdar Brahimi (Algeria) Espen Barth Eide (Norway) Jean-Marie Guéhenno (France) Dr Radha Kumar (India) Dr Patricia Lewis (Ireland/United Kingdom) Dr Jessica Tuchman Mathews (United States) DIRECTOR Dan Smith (United Kingdom) © SIPRI 2018 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of SIPRI or as expressly permitted by law. Is the world on the road to peace or war? SIPRI Annual Lecture No. 1 hans blix Preface On 28 May 2018, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute proudly hosted the inaugural SIPRI Lecture, in the presence of His Majesty Carl XVI Gustaf and Her Majesty Queen Silvia. The conceptional basis for the SIPRI Lecture recognizes oration as particularly important in light of today’s impulsive media landscape. A monograph may strug- gle to captivate a reader’s attention while short interviews may reduce nuances to soundbites. A lecture allows for the articulation of complex thoughts while directly engaging with an audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Gandhian Principles and Their Relevance for World Peace
    International Journal of Research in Social Sciences Vol. 8 Issue 10, October 2018, ISSN: 2249-2496 Impact Factor: 7.081 Journal Homepage: http://www.ijmra.us, Email: [email protected] Double-Blind Peer Reviewed Refereed Open Access International Journal - Included in the International Serial Directories Indexed & Listed at: Ulrich's Periodicals Directory ©, U.S.A., Open J-Gage as well as in Cabell‟s Directories of Publishing Opportunities, U.S.A Gandhian Principles and Their Relevance for World Peace Biplob Gogoi* Abstract Gandhi was a contemplative man of action seeking truth for the eradication of evil, injustice and exploitation in human relationships and public affairs. He wanted to devise ways and means which would be consistent with the principles he had laid down for himself as being the best. He was as heroic in fighting the evil and injustice in the world outside as in conquering the evil and weakness in his own mind. The means he adopted satisfied the double demand, namely, that they should be truthful and that they should be pure, moral and constructive. Thus, in a world where science and technology have put into the hand of those in possession of wealth, power and authority weapons of coercion and destruction beyond ordinary conception, Gandhi‟s weapons of satyagraha and non-violence were a boon. Though its use in an international conflict has yet to be tried, one can hazard the statement that non-alignment, moral pressure by non- aligned powers, and the economic and other sanctions which the international institutions often think of are along the line of nonviolent resistance to evil and injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • World Peace Through Foreign Trade
    DePaul Law Review Volume 17 Issue 1 Fall 1967 Article 3 World Peace through Foreign Trade Leonard V.B. Sutton Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review Recommended Citation Leonard V. Sutton, World Peace through Foreign Trade, 17 DePaul L. Rev. 38 (1967) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol17/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Law Review by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WORLD PEACE THROUGH FOREIGN TRADE* LEONARD V. B. SUTTONt NDOUBTEDLY, THE Second Industrial Revolution blossomed early due to the tremendous scientific development that was a by- product of World War II. The birth of the nuclear age, when viewed in retrospect, opened for mankind not only new dangers but also new hopes for human betterment. The threats of the A bomb, and later the H bomb, have forced competing ideologies to seek peaceful means to solve disputes; and have led to a myriad of scientific dis- coveries that have benefited industry as well as raised living standards for all who can purchase the new products flooding the world's markets. This new Industrial Revolution did not reach voting age until it fathered the Space Age with all the bewildering wonderment of men in space, rockets to the moon, Mars probes, fantastic speeds, space satellites and miniaturization of products. In a more mundane perspec- tive it can be noted that Americans can now see European television programs beamed live everywhere in their vast land; and, everywhere, people today own transistor radios or other devices that have sprung from these advances.
    [Show full text]
  • November, 1957 Friendship and Solidarity Among Socialist Countries
    Digital Archive digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org International History Declassified November, 1957 Friendship and Solidarity Among Socialist Countries Citation: “Friendship and Solidarity Among Socialist Countries,” November, 1957, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, Kim Il Sung Works, Vol. 11, January-December 1957 (Pyongyang, Korea: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1982), 310-322. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/117756 Summary: Kim Il Sung's article, originally published in Mezhdunarodnaya Zhizn, thanks the Soviet Union and China for assisting North Korea while deriding American foreign policy. Credits: This document was made possible with support from the Leon Levy Foundation. Original Language: English Contents: English Transcription Friendship and Solidarity Among Socialist Countries, November 1957 [Source: Kim Il Sung Works, Vol. 11, January-December 1957 (Pyongyang, Korea: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1982), 310-322.] FRIENDSHIP AND SOLIDARITY AMONG SOCIALIST COUNTRIES Article Published in the November 1957 Issue of the Soviet Magazine Mezhdunarodnaya Zhizn Forty years have elapsed since the triumph of the Great October Socialist Revolution in Russia. In this not-too-long period, fundamental changes have taken place in the history of mankind. We are now living in a new historical era. A major characteristic of this era is that socialism has become a powerful worldwide system. There was only a single socialist state in the world when the Soviet people started building socialism after the victorious October Revolution. The present situation, however, is radically different. The idea of the October Revolution which gripped masses of people has become a great material force capable of transforming human society; socialism now finds itself beyond the bounds of one country, the Soviet Union.
    [Show full text]
  • Ahimsa a Way of Life; a Path to Peace by Dr
    center for indic studies Gandhi Lecture Series Ahimsa A Way Of Life; A Path To Peace by Dr. Hope K. Fitz / Fall 2007 Gandhi Lecture Series Mahatma Gandhi’s Ahimsa – an integral part of Indic Studies mission The Center for Indic Studies at UMass Dart- ues. While he practiced Satya and Ahimsa in the mouth exists to recognize India’s ancient civilization pursuit of India’s independence, the influence of and to highlight India’s contribution to the rest of Gandhi and his followers has extended far beyond the world. That contribution has been substantial in that country. In many instances, that which is con- many fields, including, but not limited to, spiritual- sidered “Indic” is embodied by Gandhi’s words and ism, philosophy, language, science, mathematics, deeds. astronomy, and statesmanship. The concept of Ahimsa was the focus of the No one reflects or symbolizes the influence of stirring presentation in the fall of ‘07 by Dr. Hope India more than Mahatma Gandhi, unequalled for Fitz, an accomplished philosophy scholar and an his impact on humankind. His message has been avid believer in Gandhi’s philosophy. In the inaugu- profound and enduring, and relates to each of the ral Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Lecture, sponsored areas of interest of the Center for Indic Studies. Thus by the Center, Dr. Fitz urged those of Indian origin it was appropriate that the center was launched on to spread the Ahimsa philosophy throughout the October 6, 2001, in commemoration of the Mahat- world. In that way, the worldwide community will ma Gandhi’s 100th birthday on October 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reporter
    The Reporter for Conscience’ Sake The Center on Working to extend and defend the rights of Conscientious Objectors to war since 1940 Conscience & War Volume 73 Spring/Summer 2016 Number 1 Making Peace at Patapsco th Celebrating the 75 Anniversary of the First Civilian Public Service Camp at Patapsco State Park In 1917, a young Quaker conscientious objector who had been After the CCC camp closed in 1938, it was operated briefly by drafted wrote this report to his church of what had befallen the National Youth Administration. The NYA was another New him in [Army Training] Camp Cody: "I have been stripped and Deal program that sought to address the high levels of scrubbed with a broom, put under a faucet with my mouth unemployment among youth during the depression. It aimed to held open, had a rope around my neck and pulled up choking combine economic relief with on-the-job training in federally tight for a bit, been fisted, slapped, kicked, carried a bag of funded work proJects designed to provide youth with sand and dirt until I could hardly hold it and go, have been marketable skills for the future. When the conscientious kept under a shower bath until pretty chilled. If this objectors (COs) arrived there in 1941, the story made national information will do no good for others, thee may just burn this headlines. letter and let it go." The Patapsco camp (CPS Camp #3) was administered by the The letter wasn’t burned, but it did American Friends Service spark a movement, one to end the Committee, a Quaker service brutal treatment of conscientious agency, and within a week of its objectors to war.
    [Show full text]
  • Peace Culture Required for Sustainable Global Development - Ada Aharoni
    PEACE, LITERATURE, AND ART – Vol. I - Peace Culture Required for Sustainable Global Development - Ada Aharoni PEACE CULTURE REQUIRED FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT Ada Aharoni Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Department of General Studies, Haifa, Israel, and Head of the Peace Culture and Communications Commission (PCC) of IPRA: The International Peace research Association Center, Japan Keywords: new peace culture, literature and culture, media, cultural aspects, conflict resolution, women - peace allies, IFLAC, future directions. Contents 1. Introduction: The Necessity of a New Peace Culture 2. Research: Facing the Challenge of Cultural Globalization 3. Repairing the World Through Culture and Literature 4. The Media: The Need and the Will to Change 5. Cultural Aspects of Conflicts: Conflict Resolution through Culture 6. Women—Allies of Peace 7. International Forum for the Culture of Peace (IFLAC) 8. Education: Telecommunications, and the Arts 9. Future Directions 10. Conclusion: I Create Therefore I Am Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary “Life is the supreme value to which all other values are subordinate.” Albert Einstein The urgent requirement for a new ethical peace culture has become obvious at the dawn of the third millennium, considering the extent of cultural violence and the arsenals of nuclear weaponsUNESCO that threaten to destroy the –Earth. EOLSS This article presents a comprehensive vision of the urgent need for a new peace culture, literature, and media, which involve both regional and global scopes and implications. In view of the fact that the growing global culture of violence has become the greatest risk factor for the sustainability andSAMPLE future development of human CHAPTERS civilization, the deep causes and dangerous implications of violence are examined and various ways to curb it and to replace it with a culture of peace are suggested.
    [Show full text]
  • About Upeace
    OUR CAMPUS UPEACE’s Rodrigo Carazo Campus, located in Costa Rica, is named after its founder, a former Costa Rican President whose vision and passion for training future leaders for peace materialized with the creation of the University for Peace in 1980. It consists of 300 hectares located within a secondary forest reserve, home to mammals such as monkeys and deer, over 300 species of birds, and more than 100 species of trees. It is truly an example of Costa Rica’s biodiversity, and can be enjoyed by both members of the UPEACE community and outside visitors, as it includes hiking and mountain biking trails, three lakes, a lookout to help lessen obstacles and threats to world peace point, playground areas, a soccer eld, and a and progress, in keeping with the noble aspirations restaurant. proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations". The University continues its pursuit of academic excellence through the systematic and critical study, understanding, and analysis of the causes of multiple problems aecting human and global well-being. Through its rich Faculty body of Resident and Visiting Professors, UPEACE trains future leaders for peace to explore and formulate strategies and ABOUT UPEACE practices in various contexts to address such problems and contribute to the processes of Created by UN General Assembly Resolution 35/55, the University for Peace has peacebuilding and peace formation. The UPEACE been training leaders for peace for the past 38 years. It is the world’s leading Experience is experiential and unique, empowering, educational institution in the eld of peace and conict studies in its pursuit of the transformative and cultivates critical thinking in its mandate given to it by the UN General Assembly in 1980, namely "to provide students.
    [Show full text]
  • Mahatma Gandhi and World Peace
    Orissa Review * January - 2009 Mahatma Gandhi and World Peace Prof. Brahmananda Satapathy The context is the 'Global Peace' in the modern degradation in the forms of abuse and overuse of world and the text is 'Gandhian philosophy for its nature and pollution and growing paucity of attainment. The broad hypothesis is :" World resources, denial of human rights, gender bias and peace can only be realized through non-violence. injustice, crisis in the field of energy, mounting There is no alternative to non-violence". insecurity and violence, terrorism, war and The objectives of this paper are as conflicts, drug trafficking, AIDs. Besides, there following: are corruption, communalism, unemployment, regionalism, problems of language, ethical and (i) to state the problems/ crises of the modern moral degradation in private and public life. All world ; these together pose a grave challenge to the (ii) to analyse the multi-dimension of Gandhi's world. Peace is far away so long as these concepts of Non-violence and Truth; problems exist. (iii) to examine Gandhi's views on state and his II vision of democracy ; Among the various political ideologies, (iv) to present Gandhi's interpretation and democratic governance appears to be best contribution to the formulation of India's because it is this very system which provides foreign policy and world-views ; and maximum opportunities of public progress and (v) to establish an organic relationship between development. People can themselves decide the Gandhian principle and world peace. mode of their welfare. But, is the democratic system of governance free from above problems ? The modern world is facing a multi- Therefore Gandhian Philosophy is very much dimensional crisis; a crisis that poses challenge to contextual today on this accord.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Non-Intervention Question
    Global Responsibility to Protect 1 (2009) 237–252 brill.nl/gr2p China’s Non-Intervention Question Zhongying Pang Received 31 August 2008; accepted 5 November 2008 Abstract While it continues to adhere to the rule of ‘non-interference/non-intervention’ in the internal aff airs of other countries, in a rapidly changing world, a steadily rising China is exploring how it can play a more constructive role in relation to international engagement with major political and humanitarian crises. Th e transformation of China’s role in relation to international interven- tion has been driven by the nation’s growing integration into the global political economy. To date, however, China has still not become deeply involved in unilateral or multilateral coercive intervention, but has in recent times selectively participated in international eff orts mandated by the UN Security Council and has also joined or organized many regional eff orts. Facing big chal- lenges, great pressures and many uncertainties, China has to balance its traditional commitment to ‘non-interference’ with its responsibilities as a great power. Keywords 2005 World Summit Outcome Document, United Nations Security Council, UN Secretary- General’s High-Level Panel on Th reats, Challenges and Change, UN Peacekeeping, UN Charter, African Union (AU), Association for South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), Darfur, Myanmar, North Korea, humanitarian intervention, principle of non-interference, United States Although there are many aspects of continuity, Chinese foreign policy has changed in many important respects. One of the most notable ways in which Chinese foreign policy has changed can be seen in its evolving attitude and practice towards international engagement with political and humanitarian crises.
    [Show full text]