Hypatia, Inc. !"#!$%&'"(%)*&#%+#,(-).)/01#2&0)")/0#("3#45/%67('#89&+': !5%9+';/<=#>5-)"3(#4?#,&(-9 @&*)&A&3#A+'B;/<= C+5'-&=#D:E(%)(F#G+$?#HF#I+?#JF#2&0)")/0#("3#,&(-&#;CE')"KF#LHHM<F#EE?#LNJ6LOJ ,5P$)/9&3#P:=#Wiley#+"#P&9($.#+.#Hypatia, Inc. C%(P$&#Q@>=#http://www.jstor.org/stable/3810175 . !--&//&3=#JJRSLRJSLT#LT=NU Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact
[email protected]. Hypatia, Inc. and Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hypatia. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:58:12 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions An Alternativeto Pacifism? Feminismand Just-War Theory LUCINDA J. PEACH Only rarelyhave feminist theorists addressed the adequacyof just-wartheory, a set of principlesdeveloped over hundreds of yearsto assessthe justice of goingto war and the moralityof conductin war. Recently,a few feministscholars have found just-wartheory inadequate, yet theirown counterproposals are also deficient. I assess feministcontributions to just-war theorizing and suggest ways of strengthening,rather thanabandoning, this moral approach to war. INTRODUCTION Womenhave traditionallybeen excludedfrom involvement in war.War has been consideredalmost exclusively a male enterprise:fought by men, with and againstother men, for male-definedpurposes and ends.