Ecography ECOG-01538 Maglianesi, M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecography ECOG-01538 Maglianesi, M Ecography ECOG-01538 Maglianesi, M. A., Blüthgen, N., Böhning-Gaese, K. and Schleuning, M. 2015. Topographic microclimates drive microhabitat associations at the range margin of a butterfly. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.01538 Supplementary material Appendix 1 Table A1. List of families, genera and species of plants recorded by identification of pollen loads carried by hummingbird individuals at three elevations in northeastern Costa Rica. Only plant morphotypes that could be identified to species, genus or family level are given. The proportion of pollen identified to species level was 43% and that identified to a higher taxonomic level was 10%; 47% of pollen grains were categorized into pollen morphotypes (not shown here). Plant families are ordered alphabetically within each elevation. Elevation Family Genus Species Low Bromeliaceae Aechmea Aechmea mariareginae Low Acanthaceae Aphelandra Aphelandra storkii Low Bignoniaceae Arrabidaea Arrabidaea verrucosa Low Gesneraciae Besleria Besleria columnoides Low Alstroemeriaceae Bomarea Bomarea obovata Low Gesneriaceae Columnea Columnea linearis Low Gesneraceae Columnea Columnea nicaraguensis Low Gesneraceae Columnea Columnea purpurata Low Gesneraceae Columnea Columnea querceti Low Costaceae Costus Costus pulverulentus Low Costaceae Costus Costus scaber Low Costaceae Costus Costus sp 1 Low Gesneriaceae Drymonia Drymonia macrophylla Low Ericaceae Ericaceae Ericaceae 1 Low Ericaceae Ericaceae Ericaceae 2 Low Bromeliaceae Guzmania Guzmania monostachia Low Rubiaceae Hamelia Hamelia patens Low Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia imbricata Low Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia irrasa Low Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia latisphata Low Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia mariae Low Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia mathiaseae Low Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia pogonantha Low Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia wagneriana 1 Table A1 (continued) Elevation Family Genus Species Low Malvaceae Malvaviscus Malvaviscus concinnus Low Musaceae Musa Musa sapientum Low Passifloraceae Passiflora Passiflora vitifolia Low Rubiaceae Pentagonia Pentagonia monocaulis Low Rubiaceae Psychotria Psychotria elata Low Rubiaceae Psychotria Psychotria poeppigiana Low Acanthaceae Razisea Razisea wilburii Low Zingiberacae Renealmia Renealmia cernua Low Acanthaceae Ruellia Ruellia metallica Low Berenaceae Stachytarpheta Stachytarpheta frantzii Low Rubiaceae Warscewiczia Warscewiczia coccinea Mid Asteraceae - Asteraceae 1 Mid Gesneraciae Besleria Besleria columnoides Mid Gesneriaceae Besleria Besleria notabilis Mid Gesneriaceae Besleria Besleria triflora Mid Bromeliaceae - Bromeliaceae 1 Mid Bromeliaceae - Bromeliaceae 2 Mid Bromeliaceae - Bromeliaceae 3 Mid Bromeliaceae - Bromeliaceae 4 Mid Bromeliaceae - Bromeliaceae 5 Mid Bromeliaceae - Bromeliaceae 6 Mid Ericaceae Cavendishia Cavendishia callista Mid Ericaceae Cavendishia Cavendishia complectens Mid Ericaceae Cavendishia Cavendishia querene Mid Campanulaceae Centropogon Centropogon granulosus Mid Gesneriaceae Columnea Columnea magnifica Mid Gesneriaceae Columnea Columnea microcalyx Mid Gesneriaceae Columnea Columnea microphylla Mid Gesneriaceae Columnea Columnea purpurata Mid Gesneriaceae Columnea Columnea querceti Mid Costaceae Costus Costus curvibracteatus Mid Costaceae Costus Costus pulverulentus Mid Gesneriaceae Drymonia Drymonia conchocalyx Mid Gesneriaceae Drymonia Drymonia tomentulifera Mid Gesneriaceae Drymonia Drymonia warszewicziana Mid Ericaceae - Ericaceae 3 Mid Gesneriaceae Gasteranthus Gasteranthus wendlandianus 2 Table A1 (continued) Elevation Family Genus Species Mid Bromealiaceae Guzmania Guzmania nicaraguensis Mid Bromeliaceae Guzmania Guzmania plicatifolia Mid Bromealiaceae Guzmania Guzmania scandens Mid Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia atropurpurea Mid Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia latisphata Mid Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia rodriguezii Mid Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia vaginalis Mid Rubiaceae Hilia Hilia triflora Mid Solanaceae Merinthopodium Merinthopodium neuranthum Mid Mimosoideae - Mimosoideae 1 Mid Mimosoideae - Mimosoideae 2 Mid Rubiaceae Palicourea Palicourea gamezii Mid Bromeliaceae Pitcairnia Pitcairnia brittoniana Mid Ericaceae Psammisia Psammisia ramiflora Mid Rubiaceae Psychotria Psychotria carthagenensis Mid Rubiaceae Psychotria Psychotria elata Mid Zingiberacea Renealmia Renealmia ligulata Mid Rubiaceae Sabicea Sabicea panamensis Mid Ericaceae Satyria Satyria warszewiczii Mid Lamiaceae Scutellaria Scutellaria costaricana Mid Ericaceae Thibaudia Thibaudia costaricensis High Gesneriaceae Besleria Besleria barbensis High Gesneriaceae Besleria Besleria solanoides High Melastomataceae Blakea Blakea anomala High Alstroemeriaceae Bomarea Bomarea hirsuta High Campanulaceae Burmeistera Burmeistera parviflora High Maranthaceae Calathea Calathea 1 High Ericaceae Cavendishia Cavendishia bracteata High Campanulaceae Centropogon Centropogon smithii High Campanulaceae Centropogon Centropogon solanifolius High Solanaceae Cestrum Cestrum poasanum High Gesneriaceae Columnea Columnea magnifica High Ericaceae Disterigma Disterigma humboltii High Orchidaceae Epidendrum Epidendrum polychlamys High Ericaceae - Ericaceae 4 High Ericaceae Gaultheria Gaultheria gracilis High Rubiaceae Gonzalagunia Gonzalagunia rosea 3 Table A1 (continued) Elevation Family Genus Species High Rubiaceae Guetarda Guetarda crispiflora High Cucurbitaceae Gurania Gurania coccinea High Heliconiaceae Heliconia Heliconia lankesterii High Rubiaceae Hoffmania Hoffmania arborescens High Gesneraceae Kohleria Kohleria tigridia High Gentianaceae Macrocarpaea Macrocarpaea valerioi High Malvaceae Malvaviscus Malvaviscus palmanus High Melastomataceae Meriania Meriania phlomoides High Mimosoideae - Mimosoideae 3 High Asteraceae Neomirandea Neomirandea eximia High Orchidiaceae - Orchidiaceae 1 High Orchidiaceae - Orchidiaceae 2 High Rubiaceae Palicourea Palicourea gamezii High Rubiaceae Palicourea Palicourea lasiorrhachis High Ericaceae Satyria Satyria warszewiczii High Gesneriaceae Solenophora Solenophora calycosa High Bromeliaceae Tillandsia Tillandsia insignis High Ericaceae Vaccinum Vaccinum poasanum High Bromeliaceae Werauhia Werauhia camptoclada High Bromeliaceae Werauhia Werauhia ororiensis 4 Table A2. Total abundance of mist–netted hummingbird species at three different elevations in northeastern Costa Rica (from lowland to montane forests) and number of individuals sampled for pollen loads (n = 357). Hummingbird species are ordered alphabetically within each elevation. Hummingbird species indicated with an asterisk at a given elevation were not considered for pollen analyses because the number of pollen samples was too small or because they were not present in the study area for the time periods selected for pollen identification. Total N° of Elevation Group Species Abundance Individuals Low Non–hermit Amazilia amabilis 9 6 Low Non–hermit Amazilia tzacatl 22 5 Low Non–hermit Chalybura urochrysia 9 5 Low Non–hermit Florisuga mellivora 2 1 Low Hermit Glaucis aenea 5 3 Low Non–hermit Klais guimeti* 3 - Low Non–hermit Microchera albocoronata* 1 - Low Non–hermit Phaecroa cuvieri* 1 - Low Hermit Phaethornis longirostris 47 27 Low Hermit Phaethornis striigularis 21 11 Low Non–hermit Thalurania colombica 53 13 Low Hermit Threnetes ruckeri 31 19 Mid Non–hermit Amazilia tzacatl* 1 - Mid Non–hermit Campylopterus hemileucurus* 2 - Mid Non–hermit Discosura conversii 2 2 Mid Non–hermit Doryfera ludovicae 11 7 Mid Non–hermit Elvira cupreceips 6 3 Mid Non–hermit Eupherusa nigriventris 45 31 Mid Hermit Eutoxeres aquila 7 6 Mid Non–hermit Heliodoxa jacula 33 17 Mid Non–hermit Lampornis calolaema* 1 - Mid Non–hermit Lampornis hemileucus 32 21 Mid Hermit Phaethornis guy 119 47 Mid Hermit Phaethornis striigularis 13 13 Mid Non–hermit Thalurania colombica 11 5 High Non–hermit Campylopterus hemileucurus 13 9 High Non–hermit Colibri thalassinus* 7 - High Non–hermit Doryfera ludovicae 13 2 High Non–hermit Eugenes fulgens 10 4 High Non–hermit Eupherusa nigriventris* 1 - High Non–hermit Heliodoxa jacula 17 12 High Non–hermit Hylocharis eliciae* 2 - High Non–hermit Lampornis calolaema 153 84 5 Total N° of Elevation Group Species Abundance Individuals High Non–hermit Panterpe insignis 13 4 High Non–hermit Phaethornis guy* 3 - High Non–hermit Selasphorus flammulla* 17 - High Non–hermit Selasphorus scintilla* 24 - High Non–hermit Thalurania colombica* 2 - 6 .
Recommended publications
  • Topazes and Hermits
    Trochilidae I: Topazes and Hermits Fiery Topaz, Topaza pyra Topazini Crimson Topaz, Topaza pella Florisuginae White-necked Jacobin, Florisuga mellivora Florisugini Black Jacobin, Florisuga fusca White-tipped Sicklebill, Eutoxeres aquila Eutoxerini Buff-tailed Sicklebill, Eutoxeres condamini Saw-billed Hermit, Ramphodon naevius Bronzy Hermit, Glaucis aeneus Phaethornithinae Rufous-breasted Hermit, Glaucis hirsutus ?Hook-billed Hermit, Glaucis dohrnii Threnetes ruckeri Phaethornithini Band-tailed Barbthroat, Pale-tailed Barbthroat, Threnetes leucurus ?Sooty Barbthroat, Threnetes niger ?Broad-tipped Hermit, Anopetia gounellei White-bearded Hermit, Phaethornis hispidus Tawny-bellied Hermit, Phaethornis syrmatophorus Mexican Hermit, Phaethornis mexicanus Long-billed Hermit, Phaethornis longirostris Green Hermit, Phaethornis guy White-whiskered Hermit, Phaethornis yaruqui Great-billed Hermit, Phaethornis malaris Long-tailed Hermit, Phaethornis superciliosus Straight-billed Hermit, Phaethornis bourcieri Koepcke’s Hermit, Phaethornis koepckeae Needle-billed Hermit, Phaethornis philippii Buff-bellied Hermit, Phaethornis subochraceus Scale-throated Hermit, Phaethornis eurynome Sooty-capped Hermit, Phaethornis augusti Planalto Hermit, Phaethornis pretrei Pale-bellied Hermit, Phaethornis anthophilus Stripe-throated Hermit, Phaethornis striigularis Gray-chinned Hermit, Phaethornis griseogularis Black-throated Hermit, Phaethornis atrimentalis Reddish Hermit, Phaethornis ruber ?White-browed Hermit, Phaethornis stuarti ?Dusky-throated Hermit, Phaethornis squalidus Streak-throated Hermit, Phaethornis rupurumii Cinnamon-throated Hermit, Phaethornis nattereri Little Hermit, Phaethornis longuemareus ?Tapajos Hermit, Phaethornis aethopygus ?Minute Hermit, Phaethornis idaliae Polytminae: Mangos Lesbiini: Coquettes Lesbiinae Coeligenini: Brilliants Patagonini: Giant Hummingbird Lampornithini: Mountain-Gems Tro chilinae Mellisugini: Bees Cynanthini: Emeralds Trochilini: Amazilias Source: McGuire et al. (2014)..
    [Show full text]
  • BROMELI ANA PUBLISHED by the NEW YORK BROMELIAD SOCIETY (Visit Our Website
    BROMELI ANA PUBLISHED BY THE NEW YORK BROMELIAD SOCIETY (visit our website www.nybromeliadsociety.org) February, 2014 Volume 51, No.2 ON ROOTING (there is a time for every season...) by Herb Plever It is well told in Ecclesiastes 3 that there is a right even though I was aware of the seasonal slowdown. time for everything to be done, including a time to plant. But even in my indoor apartment, in the fall and More specifically, there is a right time to pot up a winter the light is reduced, it is drier and it is much bromeliad, particularly atmospheric tillandsias, so they cooler. We don’t put on the blower motors in our will quickly root in the medium. heating convectors even when it is very cold outside, As a general proposition it is said that tillandsias although the valves are open. (This permits the 1 foot produce roots in inverse proportion to the density of pipe leading to the convector to hold hot water and their trichome coverage, ie. glabrous stay hot.) leaved tillandsias with minimal or no So in the context of the above trichomes have strong root growth while rooting principles, this experiment was trichomed atmospheric tillandsias produce begun out of season at a time when many just enough wiry roots to attach plants slow down their growth and their themselves to the tree, branch or rock they production of carbohydrates. Nonetheless are holding on to. This goes contrary to some of the tillandsias did root quickly the basic idea of my experiment designed while many others rooted very slowly.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Levels of Endemism of the Bromeliaceae of Costa Rica – an Updated Checklist
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 29: 17–62Diversity (2013) and levels of endemism of the Bromeliaceae of Costa Rica... 17 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.29.4937 CHECKLIST www.phytokeys.com Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Diversity and levels of endemism of the Bromeliaceae of Costa Rica – an updated checklist Daniel A. Cáceres González1,2, Katharina Schulte1,3,4, Marco Schmidt1,2,3, Georg Zizka1,2,3 1 Abteilung Botanik und molekulare Evolutionsforschung, Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut Frankfurt/Main, Germany 2 Institut Ökologie, Evolution & Diversität, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt/Main, Germany 3 Biodive rsität und Klima Forschungszentrum (BiK-F), Frankfurt/Main, Germany 4 Australian Tropical Herbarium & Center for Tropical Biodiversity and Climate Change, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia Corresponding author: Daniel A. Cáceres González ([email protected]) Academic editor: L. Versieux | Received 1 March 2013 | Accepted 28 October 2013 | Published 11 November 2013 Citation: González DAC, Schulte K, Schmidt M, Zizka G (2013) Diversity and levels of endemism of the Bromeliaceae of Costa Rica – an updated checklist. PhytoKeys 29: 17–61. doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.29.4937 This paper is dedicated to the late Harry Luther, a world leader in bromeliad research. Abstract An updated inventory of the Bromeliaceae for Costa Rica is presented including citations of representa- tive specimens for each species. The family comprises 18 genera and 198 species in Costa Rica, 32 spe- cies being endemic to the country. Additional 36 species are endemic to Costa Rica and Panama. Only 4 of the 8 bromeliad subfamilies occur in Costa Rica, with a strong predominance of Tillandsioideae (7 genera/150 spp.; 75.7% of all bromeliad species in Costa Rica).
    [Show full text]
  • Observations of Hummingbird Feeding Behavior at Flowers of Heliconia Beckneri and H
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 18: 133–138, 2007 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society OBSERVATIONS OF HUMMINGBIRD FEEDING BEHAVIOR AT FLOWERS OF HELICONIA BECKNERI AND H. TORTUOSA IN SOUTHERN COSTA RICA Joseph Taylor1 & Stewart A. White Division of Environmental and Evolutionary Biology, Graham Kerr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, CB23 6DH, UK. Observaciones de la conducta de alimentación de colibríes con flores de Heliconia beckneri y H. tortuosa en El Sur de Costa Rica. Key words: Pollination, sympatric, cloud forest, Cloudbridge Nature Reserve, Green Hermit, Phaethornis guy, Violet Sabrewing, Campylopterus hemileucurus, Green-crowned Brilliant, Heliodoxa jacula. INTRODUCTION sources in a single foraging bout (Stiles 1978). Interactions between closely related sympatric The flower preferences shown by humming- flowering plants may involve competition for birds (Trochilidae) are influenced by a com- pollinators, interspecific pollen loss and plex array of factors including their bill hybridization (e.g., Feinsinger 1987). These dimensions, body size, habitat preference and processes drive the divergence of genetically relative dominance, as influenced by age and based floral phenotypes that influence polli- sex, and how these interact with the morpho- nator assemblages and behavior. However, logical, caloric and visual properties of flow- floral convergence may be favored if the ers (e.g., Stiles 1976). increased nectar supplies and flower densities, Hummingbirds are the primary pollina- for example, increase the regularity and rate tors of most Heliconia species (Heliconiaceae) of flower visitation for all species concerned (Linhart 1973), which are medium to large (Schemske 1981). Sympatric hummingbird- clone-forming herbs that usually produce pollinated plants probably face strong selec- brightly colored floral bracts (Stiles 1975).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Condors and Humming-Birds of the Equatorial Andes
    Annals and Magazine of Natural History Series 4 ISSN: 0374-5481 (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnah10 XXI.—On the condors and humming-birds of the Equatorial Andes James Orton To cite this article: James Orton (1871) XXI.—On the condors and humming-birds of the Equatorial Andes , Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 8:45, 185-192, DOI: 10.1080/00222937108696463 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222937108696463 Published online: 16 Oct 2009. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3 View related articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnah10 Download by: [La Trobe University] Date: 15 June 2016, At: 22:45 Mr. J. Ortou on t£e Condors of the Equatorial Andes. 185 [In the 27th cervical vertebra of PleMosaurus Manselii~ Mr. Hulke gives the measurements as :- From front to back of centrum .......... 2~ inches. Width of centrum .................... 4 ,, Depth of centrum .................... 3~ ,, and in the pectoral region the distinctive proportions of width and depth become slightly more marked. The more concave articular face of the eentrum and less thickened peripheral margin of the Kimmeridge species con- firm the specific distinction of the types.] Pectoral vertebra.--The pectoral vertebra of P. wlns2itensis appears to measure-- From front to back of the centrum " 18 inch. Width of centrum .................... 2-) inches. Depth of centrum .................... 1{ inch. Thus the form of the articular surface of the eentrum is broader from side to side than in the neck; it is also a little flatter.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Scientific Progress Report Study Site
    Project Ecology of plant-hummingbird interactions along an elevational gradient Scientific Progress Report Project leader: Catherine Graham, Swiss Federal Research Institute Principal investigator: María Alejandra Maglianesi, Universidad Estatal a Distancia Coordinator: Emanuel Brenes Rodríguez, Universidad Estatal a Distancia Study site Las Nubes Biological Reserve York University San José, Costa Rica January, 2020 1 INTRODUCTION A primary aim of community ecology is to identify the processes that govern species assemblages across environmental gradients (McGill et al. 2006), allowing us to understand why biodiversity is non-randomly distributed on Earth. Mutualistic interactions such as those between plants and their animal pollinators are the major biodiversity component from which the integrity of ecosystems depends (Valiente-Banuet et al. 2015). The interdependence of plant and pollinators can be assessed using a network approach, which is a powerful tool to analyze the complexity of ecological systems (Ings et al. 2009), especially in highly diversified tropical regions. Mountain regions provide pronounced environmental gradients across relatively small spatial scales and have proved to be a suitable model system to investigate patterns and determinants of species diversity and community structure (Körner 2000, Sanders and Rahbek 2012). Although some studies have investigated the variation in plant–pollinator interaction networks across elevational gradients (Ramos-Jiliberto et al. 2010, Benadi et al. 2013), such studies are still scarce, particularly in the tropics. In the Neotropics, hummingbirds (Trochilidae) are considered to be effective pollinators (Castellanos et al. 2003). They have been classified into two distinct groups: hermits and non-hermits, which differ mainly in their elevational distribution and their level of specialization on floral resources, i.e., the proportion of floral resources available in the community that is used by species (Stiles 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • The Behavior and Ecology of Hermit Hummingbirds in the Kanaku Mountains, Guyana
    THE BEHAVIOR AND ECOLOGY OF HERMIT HUMMINGBIRDS IN THE KANAKU MOUNTAINS, GUYANA. BARBARA K. SNOW OR nearly three months, 17 January to 5 April 1970, my husband and I F camped at the foot of the Kanaku Mountains in southern Guyana. Our camp was situated just inside the forest beside Karusu Creek, a tributary of Moco Moco Creek, at approximately 80 m above sea level. The period of our visit was the end of the main dry season which in this part of Guyana lasts approximately from September or October to April or May. Although we were both mainly occupied with other observations we hoped to accumulate as much information as possible on the hermit hummingbirds of the area, particularly their feeding niches, nesting and social organization. Previously, while living in Trinidad, we had studied various aspects of the behavior and biology of the three hermit hummingbirds resident there: the breeding season (D. W. Snow and B. K. Snow, 1964)) the behavior at singing assemblies of the Little Hermit (Phaethornis Zonguemareus) (D. W. Snow, 1968)) the feeding niches (B. K. Snow and D. W. Snow, 1972)) the social organization of the Hairy Hermit (Glaucis hirsuta) (B. K. Snow, 1973) and its breeding biology (D. W. Snow and B. K. Snow, 1973)) and the be- havior and breeding of the Guys’ Hermit (Phuethornis guy) (B. K. Snow, in press). A total of six hermit hummingbirds were seen in the Karusu Creek study area. Two species, Phuethornis uugusti and Phaethornis longuemureus, were extremely scarce. P. uugusti was seen feeding once, and what was presumably the same individual was trapped shortly afterwards.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcantarea (Bromeliaceae) Leaf Anatomical Characterization and Its Systematic Implications
    Nordic Journal of Botany 28: 385Á397, 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2010.00727.x, # The Authors. Journal compilation # Nordic Journal of Botany 2010 Subject Editors: Guido Grimm and Thomas Denk. Accepted 26 April 2010 Alcantarea (Bromeliaceae) leaf anatomical characterization and its systematic implications Leonardo M. Versieux, Paula Maria Elbl, Maria das Grac¸as Lapa Wanderley and Nanuza Luiza de Menezes L. M. Versieux ([email protected]), Depto de Botaˆnica, Ecologia e Zoologia, Univ. Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, 59072- 970, Brazil. Á P. M. Elbl and N. Luiza de Menezes, Depto de Botaˆnica, Inst. de Biocieˆncias, Univ. de Sa˜o Paulo, Rua do Mata˜o, trav. 14, n. 321, Sa˜o Paulo, SP, 05508-090, Brazil. Á M. das Grac¸as Lapa Wanderley, Inst. de Botaˆnica, Caixa Postal 3005, Sa˜o Paulo, SP, 01061- 970, Brazil. Alcantarea (Bromeliaceae) has 26 species that are endemic to eastern Brazil, occurring mainly on gneissÁgranitic rock outcrops (‘inselbergs’). Alcantarea has great ornamental potential and several species are cultivated in gardens. Limited data is available in the literature regarding the leaf anatomical features of the genus, though it has been shown that it may provide valuable information for characterizing of Bromeliaceae taxa. In the present work, we employed leaf anatomy to better characterize the genus and understand its radiation into harsh environments, such as inselbergs. We also searched for characteristics potentially useful in phylogenetic analyses and in delimiting Alcantarea and Vriesea. The anatomical features of the leaves, observed for various Alcantarea species, are in accordance with the general pattern shown by other Bromeliaceae members.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Nectar Concentration and Hummingbird Visitation
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 2016 Trends in Nectar Concentration and Hummingbird Visitation: Investigating different variables in three flowers of the Ecuadorian Cloud Forest: Guzmania jaramilloi, Gasteranthus quitensis, and Besleria solanoides Sophie Wolbert SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Animal Studies Commons, Community-Based Research Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, and the Plant Biology Commons Recommended Citation Wolbert, Sophie, "Trends in Nectar Concentration and Hummingbird Visitation: Investigating different variables in three flowers of the Ecuadorian Cloud Forest: Guzmania jaramilloi, Gasteranthus quitensis, and Besleria solanoides" (2016). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 2470. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2470 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wolbert 1 Trends in Nectar Concentration and Hummingbird Visitation: Investigating different variables in three flowers of the Ecuadorian Cloud Forest: Guzmania jaramilloi, Gasteranthus quitensis, and Besleria solanoides Author: Wolbert, Sophie Academic
    [Show full text]
  • Do Sympatric Heliconias Attract the Same Species of Hummingbird? Observations on the Pollination Ecology of Heliconia Beckneri and H
    Do Sympatric Heliconias Attract the Same Species of Hummingbird? Observations on the Pollination Ecology of Heliconia beckneri and H. tortuosa at Cloudbridge Nature Reserve Joseph Taylor University of Glasgow The Hummingbird-Heliconia Project The hummingbird family (Trochilidae), endemic to the Neotropics, is remarkable not only for its beauty but also because of its ability to hover over a flower while feeding, its wing movements a blur. These lively birds require frequent, nutritious feeding to sustain their expenditure of energy, and some plants have evolved to attract and feed them in exchange for pollination services. Prominent among such plants are most species in the genus Heliconia (Heliconiaceae), which are medium to large clone-forming herbs with banana-like leaves (Stiles, 1975). The hummingbird-Heliconia interdependence is a good example of co- evolution, and this study is concerned with one aspect of this relationship. Since several species of hummingbird and Heliconia exist at Cloudbridge, a middle-elevation nature reserve in Costa Rica, we wondered whether particular species of Heliconia had evolved an attraction for particular hummingbird species, which might reduce the chances of hybridisation and pollen loss; or whether the plants compete for a variety of hummingbirds. At Cloudbridge, on the Pacific slope of southern Costa Rica’s Talamanca mountain range, Heliconia beckneri , an endangered species (website 1) restricted to this area and thought to be of hybrid origin (Daniels and Stiles, 1979; website 2), and H. tortuosa occur together. Stiles (1979) names the Green Hermit ( Phaethornis guy ) as the primary pollinator of both species and the Violet Sabrewing ( Campylopterus hemileucurus ) as the secondary pollinator of H.
    [Show full text]
  • Portada Reporte De Plantas Nativas
    A Selection of Native Plants with Ornamental Potential for Use in Urban and Rural Habitats: An Ex situ Conservation Assessment Parque Zoológico y Jardín Botánico Nacional Simón Bolívar San José, Costa Rica 14-15 February, 2019 FINAL REPORT Organized and funded: Rodríguez, J.E., Formoso, C., Cabezas, F. & Matamoros, Y. (Eds). 2020. A Selection of Native Plants with Ornamental Potential for Use in Urban and Rural Habitats: An Ex situ Conservation Assessment. 14-15 February, 2019. Parque Zoológico y Jardín Botánico Nacional Simón Bolívar, San José, Costa Rica. Conservation Planning Specialist Group UICN SSC (CPSG Mesoamerica). Thanks to Barry E. Hammel, Willow Zuchowski, Gerardo Herrera and Esteban Jiménez for their consistent and patient support during the Workshop and the writing of the Final Report. Cover Picture: Pseudogynoxys cummingii. Fernando Cabezas. Thanks to Lizbeth Ovares, Paula Álvarez and Cristina Formoso from Fundación Pro Zoológicos for their effort in taking notes during the Workshop and thus getting a more complete Final Report. A contribution between Fundación Pro Zoologicos and the IUCN SSC Conservation Planning Specialists Group (CPSG Mesoamerica). CPSG, SSC and IUCN promote workshops and other forums for the analysis and consideration of conservation-related problems and consider that the reports of these meetings are very useful when they are widely distributed. The opinions and recommendations expressed in this report reflect the issues discussed and the ideas expressed by workshop participants and do not necessarily
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics and Geographic Variation in Long-Tailed Hermit Hummingbirds
    ORNITOWGIA NEOTROPICAL 7: 119-148, @ The Neotropical Oroithologi<2! Society SYSTEMATICS ANO GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN LONG-TAILEO HERMIT HUMMINGBIROS, THE PHAETHORNIS SUPERCIL/OSUS- MALARIS-LONGIROSTRIS SPECIES GROUP (TROCHILIOAE), WITH NOTES ON THEIR BIOGEOGRAPHY Christoph Hinkelmann* Alexander Koenig Zoological Research Institute and Zoological Museum, Ornithology, Group: Biology and Phylogeny of Tropical Birds, Adenauerallee 160, D-53113 Bonn 1, Germany. Resumen. El grupo de Phaethornis superciliosus y especies relacionadas se compone de tres especies de orígen probablemente monofilético: R superciliosus, R malaris y R longirostris. R longirostris está limitado a América Central y Sudamérica al oeste de los Andes. Existen 6 subespeciesválidas; una de estas, R I. baroni, posiblemente ya ha alcanzado aislamiento reproductivo. Las poblaciones distribuidas entre Guatemala y Costa Rica representan una wna extensa de introgresi6n de caracteres morfol6gicos entre dos subespecies,R I. cephalUsy R I. longirostris. En Sudamérica al este de los Andes, similitudes y introgresi6n de caracteres morfol6gicos indican que 6 subespecies válidas pueden ser asignados a R malaris mientras que R superciliosus incluye dos subespeciesválidas en los dos margenes del Río Amawnas en su curso inferior. En el Perú, caracteres de coloraci6n de R malaris moorei y R m. bolivianUs se mezclan en una zdna de introgresi6n aparentemente en correlaci6n con la distribuci6n altitudinal. Sin embargo, no se puede definir con certeza la posici6n taxon6mica de R malaris ochraceiventris; posiblemente, este taxon ya ha alcanzado el estado de especies.Mientras R tongirostris está completamente aislado geograficámente de R malaris y R superciliosus, las subespeciesde estas dos actuan como paraespecieso alloespecies en varias partes de sus áreas de distribuci6n.
    [Show full text]