James Field, Violet Lane FPS/J1155/7/59, and Schedule 14 Application NATROW/J1155/529A/08/90 Made 3Rd July 2008 Page 0 of 34
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
James Field, Violet Lane FPS/J1155/7/59, and Schedule 14 Application NATROW/J1155/529A/08/90 made 3rd July 2008 Page 0 of 34 1 Page 0 of 34 DL666 East Park : Five Fords Barton (Farm), a working farm of heritage and culture - versus - Modification Order 2006 Content-Publishing-Copyright-restricted, not for public sale, performance or display; limited to direct usage in Definitive Map Review Uffculme only unless prior permission granted. Publication rights reserved James Field or his heirs. To be printed in colour only, no BW James Field, Violet Lane FPS/J1155/7/59, and Schedule 14 Application NATROW/J1155/529A/08/90 made 3rd July 2008 Page 1 of 34 2 James Field 2nd October 2012 This document should be reproduced in colour, any black & white copying will be 3 misconstrued, & deemed tampering with ‘Evidence’. It represents that delivered to the Planning Inspectorate 29th June 2012 4 Rights of Way Section Modification Order Inquiry Madgelake Hall , Uffculme [Handed in on 3rd October 2012] 5 Planning Inspectorate 6 Temple Quay House This document contains both minor changes, & additions inclusive of legal maxims and 7 2 The Square precedence, to improve, & further the reader’s ability to comprehend the document & the 8 Bristol beneficial information contained within regarding inquiry fixing and public office fraud. 9 BS1 6PN 10 With reference to the Devon Green Lanes Schedule 14 Application FPS/J1155/7/98 : [NATROW/J1155/529A/08/90] made 11 3rd July 2008, to add a further footpath across Five Fords Farm, Uffculme. This current Modification Order involves the same 12 location and people, and evidence relied on as that used during expropriation of Violet Lane during two sham Public 13 Inquiries: 18th Sept 2007, and 15th July 2008. Shifting the front two players does not remove the criminal accountability of 14 those lying low. 15 This document represents an overview of my objection to the continued unwarranted interference at Five Fords Uffculme, 16 and by extension, the Brookshill to Prescott Path, and that area of Five Fords Farm in the vicinity of Brookshill to Ratsash 17 Lane. It does not amount to every angle, very little history research evidence is intended to be provided. This is due to the 18 fraudulent nature and ineptness of DEFRA’s Inspector Mr Peter Millman, being supported by DEFRA during their primary 19 response and ‘strike out claim’ of 7th August 2009, re Bath County Court re James Field v. S of S DEFRA Claim No 9BA00769 20 I agree with Mr Coombs’s perception, within his Schedule 14 Application, that Uffculme Parish Council (UPC) have shown 21 irregularities and bad faith, certainly the appearance of Mr Welland’s circa thirty (c30) years contempt and misfeasance in 22 public office1; it appears the reason why he took office as of January 1979, & why Mr Gollop’s letter of 18th July 2007 holds 23 only half true2, therefore what we must do, is not lose sight of what came before the illicitly contrived Violet Lane Order 24 FPS/J1155/7/59, and the malicious Schedule 14 Application made by the Front players of the Devon Green Lanes Group. 25 But I object to people interfering with my own rights using illegal means, today’s inquiry clearly demonstrated fraud; the 26 highlighting of the Finance Act 1910 map, caught my attention when I saw the file, as did the argue and agreed, appear to 27 disagree, because I have read all3 the Parish Minutes of Uffculme, and digitally transcribed the entries for PROWs & leisure 28 in MS ‘Word’ format. This allows fast search, and pattern—spotting, particularly the transition to stealth c mid/late 1970s. 29 Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea: (3 Inst. 107.)—The act itself does not constitute guilt unless done with a guilty 4 30 intent.5/100 31 Regina v. Exall (1866) 4 F & F 922; Pollock CB; Evidence 32 Circumstantial evidence might be compared to a rope comprised of several cords: "One strand of the cord might be insufficient to sustain 33 the weight, but three stranded together may be quite of sufficient strength. Thus it may be in circumstantial evidence - there may be a 34 combination of circumstances, no one of which would raise a reasonable conviction, or more than a mere suspicion: but the whole taken 35 together, may create a strong conclusion of guilt, that is, with as much certainty as human affairs can require or admit of." 36 Omnia præsumuntur contra spoliatorem : (Branch. Max. 80.)—All things are presumed against a wrongdoer.64/100 37 It is within the constitution of democracy that we are entitled to the principles of natural justice when our corporeal and 38 incorporeal rights are affected by the state. Therefore, there’re the events of people coming together in what we can identify 39 to be lawful & unlawful conspiracy. The coming together of User Groups leisure industry, & new statutes through the 1980s 40 and beyond 2000, regulating the countryside has instigated oppressive political―unlawful tactics (unscrupulous means). 1 Rex v. Wyat (1705) 1 Salk 380; Farrington v. Thomson and Bridgland [1959] VR 286; R v. Dytham [1979] Q.B. 722 (Shaw LJ, Lord Widgery CJ); Regina v. Bowden (Terence) [1996] 1 WLR 98; [1995] 4 All ER 505; 93/6974/X2; Elliott v. Chief Constable of Wiltshire and Others [1996] TLR 693; Three Rivers District Council and Others v. Governor and Company of The Bank of England (No 3) [2000] UKHL 331 [2000] 2 WLR 1220 [2000] 3 All ER 1 [2003] 2 AC 1; David Stanley Docker ‘2’ from 1998. Darker (Personal Representative of David Stanley Docker (Deceased) and Others (Formerly Head and Others) v. Chief Constable of The West Midlands Police [2000] UKHL 44 [2000] 3 WLR 747 [2001] AC 435 Gazette, 2000-08-17 Times, 2000-08-01 HL 2000-08-01; Karagozlu v. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2006] EWCA Civ 1691 Times, 2006-12-26 [2007] 1 WLR 1881. 2 Regina v. Lydon (1987) 85 Cr App R 221; A gun and two scraps of paper (saying "Sean rules")… Not limited to Mr Gollop’s c15 recorded years of significant participation in Parish Council affairs particular to PROWs during the 1980s and 1990s and shadowing Mr Welland the Parish Clerk since 1996. See page 6 of the Devon C C PROW Committee, 9 page report EEC/08/273/HQ 10th Nov 2008 3 The Parish Clerk, Mr Francis Welland’s holds all but two of the early Minutes books, the monthly books 1894-1916, & 1916-1928 DRO. 4 George Frederick Wharton’s (Attorney-at Law) 1865, Legal Maxims Parts I & II provide invaluable insight to common law authorities. Page 1 of 34 DL666 East Park : Five Fords Barton (Farm), a working farm of heritage and culture - versus - Modification Order 2006 Content-Publishing-Copyright-restricted, not for public sale, performance or display; limited to direct usage in Definitive Map Review Uffculme only unless prior permission granted. Publication rights reserved James Field or his heirs. To be printed in colour only, no BW James Field, Violet Lane FPS/J1155/7/59, and Schedule 14 Application NATROW/J1155/529A/08/90 made 3rd July 2008 Page 2 of 34 41 Cuilibet in suâ arte perito est credendum : (Co. Litt. 125.)—Whosoever is skilled in his profession is to be believed.23/100 42 But where do Cllr/ 5Mrs J Rudge [Morchard Bishop Parish Council] and Mr R.E. Coombs fit in amongst the hub & spokes of 43 cartwheel conspiracy at Uffculme? ― That is the question! They are not from, or members of the Culm Valley community. 44 1Mrs J Rudge & 2Mr R Coombs’s agenda for at least the last decade has involved Uffculme, their significant interaction with 45 3Mrs E Spurway of Devon CC [taking over from Mr R Spurway recorded in the P-Minutes 1993-2002] and 4Mrs J Parsons of 46 the ‘Pony Club’ & the British Horse Society (BHS) working in conspiracy to defraud in Uffculme during the 1990s is well 47 documented. Collectively I identify them as the Travelling-forum due to their association & participation in issues re the 48 Countryside & Rights of Way (CROW) Act 2000 inclusive of ‘local access forums’. — Inquiry rigging6 is a criminal act. 49 Maybe Mr Coombs, as indeed it appears are many of those identified within this document, has it pigeonholed within his 50 mind that fraudulent conduct, bullying and procedural impropriety, notably plagiarism (cheating) and interfering with due 51 process & Inquiry rigging is a legal remedy for adding further public rights of way to the Definitive Map. If only the errors of 52 Mr Coombs and those in joint venture, could be said, to have been made faithfully. The Travelling-forum and their criminal 53 associates at the Planning Inspectorate have made the Definitive Map a folly. 54 Having worked successfully together with UPC during the Cripple Lane event c2002-3, they continued with the bad faith, 55 appropriation and conspiracy to defraud Violet Lane from Five Fords Farm, events had been ongoing since time immemorial; 56 it was also the desire by many, unconnected with the farm, prior to the Violet Lane sham Inquiries, to reinstate the Old Dairy 57 Path as a public footpath. But Mr Coombs’s anger & desire*, during the Violet Lane Expropriation is not a legitimate reason 58 to continue this deceitful conduct. [*Savile v. Roberts (1699) 1 Ld Raym 374. applicable due to the unlawful conspiracy existing.] 59 It was quite clear that Mr Coombs’s inept understanding of Tithe and Finance Acts documents as evidence during public 60 inquiries7 appears to emanate from his obsessive desire to achieve access over the property of others, and not seek (hear) the 61 truth.