DOCSLIB.ORG

ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Fair Banks, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1997 United States Department of Interi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Fair Banks, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1997 United States Department of Interi ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Fairbanks , Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1997 United States Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System ARCTIC NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE Fairbanks, Alaska ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1997 United States Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service National Wildlife Refuge System Alaska Rcso~rc,cs L~brn~) ,\ lnl'ormation Services LJbr,!!y 13UEilllil!!. Suite 1 11 3211 Prm·iucncc Drive Anchorage, A K 9950R-Ui14 ~~~~~~~~~illl~lll~~~~~~~~~~nilllll~~~~~~~~m 3 4982 00021487 3 ARCTIC NATIONAL WaDLIFE REFUGE Fairbanks, Alaska REVIEW AND APPROVALS ANNUAL NARRATIVE REPORT Calendar Year 1997 Refuge Manager Date Date INTRODUCTION Size Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge, Arctic Refuge, or Arctic NWR) includes nearly 19.7 million acres, including eight million acres of wilderness. The Refuge spans more than 200 miles west to east from the Trans-Alaska pipeline corridor to Canada, and 200 miles north to south from the Beaufort Sea to the Venetie Indian Tribal Lands and the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge (NWR). Geography Major land forms include the coastal plain, the Brooks Range mountains, and the boreal forest south of the mountains. The Refuge extends south from the Beaufort Sea coast, including most offshore islands, reefs, and sandbars. It extends across the mostly treeless, rolling tundra of the coastal plain to the Brooks Range, located 8-50 miles inland from the coast. The Brooks Range runs roughly east to west through the Refuge, creating a natural north-south division. The Refuge contains the four tallest peaks (led by Mt. Isto, 9049 feet) and the only extensive glaciation in the Brooks Range. The mostly mountainous and hilly south side of the Refuge is cut by numerous stream and river valleys dominated by sub-arctic boreal forest of spruce, birch, and willow. Facilities No permanent facilities are located on the Refuge. The headquarters office is located in Fairbanks, 180 miles from the southern border of the Refuge. Other facilities include a modern bunkhouse and field station at Kaktovik on Barter Island, a few miles north of the Refuge coastal plain. Enabling Legislation On December 6, 1960, Secretary of the Interior Fred Seaton signed Public Land Order 2214 establishing the 8.9 million acre Arctic National Wildlife Range (original wildlife range), closing it to entry under existing mining laws. The original wildlife range was redesignated the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge with the signing of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) on December 2, 1980. Under ANILCA, the Refuge more than doubled in size to 18 million acres. The Act also designated three Refuge rivers as Wild rivers and eight million acres (most of the original wildlife range) as Wilderness. Section 1002 of ANILCA directed a resource assessment, including limited seismic testing, of approximately 1.5 million acres of the Refuge coastal plain (the 1002 area), pending a future Congressional decision on oil and gas leasing or Wilderness designation for the area. The State of Alaska relinquished selection of approximately 971,800 acres within the Refuge in 1983, all of which were added to the Refuge. In 1988, the lOOth Congress enacted Public Law 110-395, which added another 325,000 acres, bringing the Refuge to its current size. Refuge Purposes Public Land Order 2214 stated that the purpose of the original wildlife range was to preserve unique wildlife, wilderness, and recreational values. This purpose was added to by Section 303(2)(B) of ANILCA, which specifies that the Refuge was established and shall be managed: (i) to conserve fish and wildlife populations and habitats in their natural diversity including, but not limited to, the Porcupine caribou herd (including participation in coordinated ecological studies and management of this herd and the Western Arctic caribou herd), polar bears, grizzly bears, muskox, Dall sheep, wolves, wolverines, snow geese, peregrine falcons and other migratory birds, and Arctic char and grayling; (ii) to fulfill the international treaty obligations of the United States with respect to fish and wildlife and their habitats; (iii) to provide, in a manner consistent with purposes set forth in subparagraphs (i) and (ii), the opportunity for continued subsistence uses by local residents; and (iv) to ensure, to the maximum extent practicable and in a manner consistent with the purposes set forth in subparagraph (i), water quality and necessary water quantity within the refuge." In Section 101 of ANILCA, Congress made clear its intent to preserve within conservation system units in Alaska, including the Refuge, "nationally significant" scenic, wilderness, recreational, wildlife, and other values for the benefit of present and future generations." Section 101 further states that "it is the intent of Congress in this Act to preserve ... wilderness resource values and related recreational opportunities including but not limited to hiking, canoeing, fishing, and sport hunting, within large arctic and subarctic wild lands and on free flowing rivers II Refuge Resources The Arctic Refuge includes a unique diversity of habitats offering exceptional wildlife, wilderness, recreation, scientific, and aesthetic values. The area includes an assemblage of plant and animal life found nowhere else in the circumpolar region. Major habitat types include alpine tundra and rocky areas, wet and moist arctic tundra, boreal forest, muskeg, brackish coastal lagoons, shrub thickets, and numerous types of wetlands. The Refuge contains an unusual diversity of arctic and subarctic wildlife, including the Porcupine and Central Arctic caribou herds. The Porcupine herd, numbering some 152,000 animals, winters in the southern portion of the Refuge and in Canada. Calving and post-calving activities occur on the coastal plain from late May to late June. Up to one-fourth of the Central Arctic herd, which numbers about 18,000 animals, utilizes the northwestern part of the Refuge. All three species of North American bears (black, grizzly, and polar) are found on the Refuge. Grizzlies, which den in mountainous areas, exist throughout the Refuge. They are thought to number between 130 and 150 on the north slope. Black bears inhabit the south side boreal forest. A few polar bears annually den on the coastal plain. The Refuge contains about 400 muskoxen, which often are observed along rivers on the coastal plain. Large populations of Dall sheep occur in the mountainous areas of the Refuge, although a reliable population estimate does not exist. Other mammals found on the Refuge include moose, wolverine, wolf, arctic fox, lynx, marten, and snowshoe hare. Grayling and Arctic char are the primary sport fish that inhabit Refuge rivers. Approximately 180 species of migratory birds have been seen on the Refuge. The coastal plain is especially important for shorebirds and waterfowl that nest on or otherwise use the area during summer. Oldsquaw is the most common waterfowl species in coastal lagoons, but king and common eiders, pintails, brant, and other species also are found. Some 7 5 pairs of tundra swans nest on the coastal plain, concentrating on wetland dotted river deltas. From mid-August to mid­ September, the eastern part of the coastal plain serves as the fall staging area for an average 117,000 snow geese. The Refuge also supports the northernmost breeding population of golden eagles and includes critical habitat for the endangered peregrine falcon, much of it along the Porcupine River. Local Residents Residents of several Native villages harvest subsistence resources on the Refuge. Kaktovik, located on the northern edge of the coastal plain, is an Inupiat Eskimo village with about 210 people. Villagers utilize bowhead whale, caribou, polar bear, waterfowl, walrus, seal, Dall sheep, muskox, wolves, ptarmigan, and several species of fish. Arctic Village, an Athabascan Indian village with about 130 residents, is located on the East Fork of the Chandalar River just outside the Refuge's southern boundary. Although villagers rely mainly on the Porcupine caribou herd, they also take moose, Dall sheep, wolves, marten, beaver, lynx, fox, and several other species. Limited fishing occurs, primarily for whitefish and lake trout. Residents of Fort Yukon, Venetie, and Chalkyitsik also use Refuge resources, but to a lesser degree. Public Access and Use Public access is unrestricted except for all-terrain vehicle use. Almost all visitors get to the Refuge by bush plane. Subsistence users rely on boats, snowmobiles, and occasionally dog sleds. The Refuge is open to public use year-round. Due to the isolated, pristine nature of the area, wilderness related activities predominate. Hunting, river floating, and backpacking are the most popular. Weather limits almost all visitation to June through early October. Trips generally range from one to three weeks, partly due to the remoteness of the Refuge and the high cost of getting there. Peak use occurs in July (floating, backpacking) and August-September (hunting). Visitors can capture breathtaking views like this throughout the Refuge. Barry Whitehill "Natural history" evidence like this helps make the Refuge a special place. Barry Whitehill TABLE OF CONTENTS A. HIGHLIGHTS 1 B. CLIMATIC CONDITIONS ....................................... 2 c. LAND ACQUISITION .......................................... 3 1. Fee Title ................................... (Nothing to Report) 2. Easements .................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • French Guineas Sweep for Godolphin Cont
    MONDAY, 13 MAY 2019 CLEAN SWEEP FOR O=BRIEN FRENCH GUINEAS SWEEP By Tom Frary FOR GODOLPHIN AThere are a lot of horses there@, commented Aidan O=Brien in his typically understated way at Leopardstown on Sunday as he pondered the stable=s tsunami of Epsom Derby hopefuls including the easy G3 Derrinstown Stud Derby Trial S. scorer Broome (Ire) (Australia {GB}). Ballydoyle have now won every recognised Derby trial in Britain and Ireland in 2019 and this talented and progressive colt is responsible for two having rated a very impressive winner of the Apr. 6 G3 Ballysax S. over this course and distance. Uncovering which of the yard=s plethora of contenders for the blue riband will come out on top was an already taxing pursuit, but after another convincing prep performance from Broome it is fitting more into the unsolvable conundrum criteria. Cont. p6 Persian King justifies favouritism in the Poulains | Scoop Dyga By Tom Frary IN TDN AMERICA TODAY Testing conditions at ParisLongchamp on Sunday created by a THE WEEK IN REVIEW deluge of rain meant that equine pyrotechnics were unlikely With litigation likely in the wake of a controversial finish to the despite the formidable presence of Persian King (Ire) (Kingman GI Kentucky Derby, fans should get tied on for a long ride. {GB}). Hot favourite for the G1 The Emirates Poule d=Essai des Click or tap here to go straight to TDN America. Poulains, Godolphin and Ballymore Thoroughbred Ltd=s >TDN Rising Star= duly won, but it was more a case of a thankless task being carried out in professional manner as he delivered a first Classic success for his exhilarating sire.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Title: Historiography
    Matanuska Susitna Borough School District High School Alaska History Curriculum Guide Developed and written by the High School Alaska History Writing Team Sean Murphy, Houston High School Pam Burley, Wasilla High School Janet Blalock, Wasilla High School William Siedler, Palmer High School Paula Marsh, Palmer High School Lorri Van Diest, Curriculum Coordinator Matanuska Susitna Borough School District Dept. of Education & Instruction 501 N. Gulkana St. Palmer, AK 99645 Alaska History Course Description: Alaska History is an in-depth exploration of the rich geographic and cultural background of the state and its people from the early native people to the Russian era through statehood to the present. This course includes examination of the geography, the history, the political and the economic forces that have shaped contemporary Alaska. The course seeks to ensure that students have a strong foundation in the historic and cultural contexts of issues facing the state so they will develop a broad sense of community and strengthen skills that will encourage thoughtful consideration of issues and choices facing Alaska. Alaska History Course Objectives: Develops and fosters a sense of civic responsibility. Promotes reading, writing, research, presentation skills, and participatory activities. Supports the development of critical and abstract thinking skills, which allow students to analyze the impact of historical events in Alaska. Awareness of Alaskan geography. Students will understand the origins and diversity of Alaskan Native culture groups. Identify the components Legacy of the Russian Colonial period, 1741-1867. Examine the impact of the United States Colonial era, 1867-1912. Understand the events and people that ultimately led to statehood, 1912- 1959.
    [Show full text]
  • For the Love of the Ride You Love to Ride
    www.americanvaulting.org 1 For the Love of the Ride You love to ride. Everyday if it’s possible. They do, too. Their legs carry you through training, or hours on the trail. So check their legs daily, treat early and reverse joint damage to keep on riding. Rely on the proven treatment. Go to www.FortheLoveoftheRide.com and tell us about your love of the ride. Every Stride Counts “Official Joint Therapy” of USDF and “Official Joint Therapy” of USEF There are no known contraindications to the use of intramuscular Adequan® i.m. brand Polysulfated Glycosaminoglycan in horses. Studies have not been conducted to establish safety in breeding horses. WARNING: Do not use in horses intended for human consumption. Not for use in humans. Keep this and all medications out of the reach of children. Caution: Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian. Each 5 mL contains 500 mg Polysulfated Glycosaminoglycan. Brief Summary Indications: For the intramuscular treatment of non-infectious degenerative and/or traumatic joint dysfunction and associated lameness of the carpal and hock joints in horses. SEE PRODUCT PACKAGE INSERT FOR FULL PRESCRIBING INFORMATION. Adequan® is a registered trademark of Luitpold Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ©LUITPOLD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Animal Health Division, Shirley, NY 11967.AHD 9560-6, lss. 3/10 EVM 2 EquEstrianVaultinG | Summer 2010 EquEstrian VaultinG COlumNs 5 From the President Sheri Benjamin 6 16 11 Coaching Corner Standing Out Nancy Stevens-Brown 14 Horse Smarts On Quiet, Supple, and Obedient: Frequently Asked Questions Yossi Martonovich 18 Just for Vaulters Core is More! Megan Benjamin and Stacey Burnett 25 Through the Eyes of the Judges 22 28 The Ins and Outs of Composition Suzanne Detol Features 6 Men's Vaulting: The Extreme Equestrian Sport Sheri Benjamin HcertiorseMansFiedHiP For the Love of the Ride 10 AVA Recognizes Life and Longtime Members You love to ride.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Park Science 19(1): Arctic Alaska Are Living at the Species’ Northern-Most to Identify Habitats Most Frequented by Bears and 4-9
    National Park Service US Department of the Interior Alaska Park Science Region 11, Alaska Below the Surface Fish and Our Changing Underwater World Volume 19, Issue 1 Noatak National Preserve Cape Krusenstern Gates of the Arctic Alaska Park Science National Monument National Park and Preserve Kobuk Valley Volume 19, Issue 1 National Park June 2020 Bering Land Bridge Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve National Preserve Denali National Wrangell-St Elias National Editorial Board: Park and Preserve Park and Preserve Leigh Welling Debora Cooper Grant Hilderbrand Klondike Gold Rush Jim Lawler Lake Clark National National Historical Park Jennifer Pederson Weinberger Park and Preserve Guest Editor: Carol Ann Woody Kenai Fjords Managing Editor: Nina Chambers Katmai National Glacier Bay National National Park Design: Nina Chambers Park and Preserve Park and Preserve Sitka National A special thanks to Sarah Apsens for her diligent Historical Park efforts in assembling articles for this issue. Her Aniakchak National efforts helped make this issue possible. Monument and Preserve Alaska Park Science is the semi-annual science journal of the National Park Service Alaska Region. Each issue highlights research and scholarship important to the stewardship of Alaska’s parks. Publication in Alaska Park Science does not signify that the contents reflect the views or policies of the National Park Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute National Park Service endorsement or recommendation. Alaska Park Science is found online at https://www.nps.gov/subjects/alaskaparkscience/index.htm Table of Contents Below the Surface: Fish and Our Changing Environmental DNA: An Emerging Tool for Permafrost Carbon in Stream Food Webs of Underwater World Understanding Aquatic Biodiversity Arctic Alaska C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between Indigenous Rights, Citizenship, and Land in Territorial Alaska: How the Past Opened the Door to the Future
    The Relationship between Indigenous Rights, Citizenship and Land in Territorial Alaska: How the Past Opened the Door to the Future Item Type Article Authors Swensen, Thomas M. Download date 02/10/2021 20:55:59 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/5825 Swensen The Relationship between Indigenous Rights, Citizenship, and Land GROWING OUR OWN: INDIGENOUS RESEARCH, SCHOLARS, AND EDUCATION Proceedings from the Alaska Native Studies Conference (2015) The Relationship between Indigenous Rights, Citizenship, and Land in Territorial Alaska: How the Past Opened the Door to the Future Thomas Michael Swensen1 1Ethnic Studies Department, Colorado State University, CO. On 4 March 1944 the Alaskan newspaper the Nome Nugget published an editorial written by sixteen-year-old local Inupiat Alberta Schenck. In her letter she publically voiced how many Alaska Natives felt in their homelands amid the employment of racial prejudice against them. “To whom it may concern: this is a long story but will have to make it as brief as possible,” she began, addressing the tensions “between natives, breeds, and whites.” In the editorial forum of the Nome Nugget the young Schenck implemented a discussion concerning discrimination toward Indigenous people, as made apparent in her use of racist language in distinguishing herself and members of her fellow Indigenous community as “natives” and “breeds.”1 An unexpected activist, Schenck worked as an usher at the Alaska Dream Theater in Nome where she took tickets and assisted patrons in locating their seats. At her job she was also responsible for maintaining the lines of segregation between seating for White patrons on the main floor and Native patrons in the balcony.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Parcel G Relinquishment Environmental Assessment (EA) DOI-BLM-AK-F020-2017-0016 Serial Number F-025943
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Eastern Interior Field Office 222 University Avenue Fairbanks, AK 99709 Phone: 907-474-2200 NOAA Parcel G Relinquishment Environmental Assessment (EA) DOI-BLM-AK-F020-2017-0016 Serial Number F-025943 July 26, 2017 This Page is Intentionally Left Blank Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................5 1.1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION...................................... 6 1.2 DECISION TO BE MADE ........................................................................................ 6 1.3 CONFORMANCE WITH BLM MANAGEMENT PLAN(S).................................. 6 1.4 CONSISTENCY WITH LAWS, REGULATIONS, AND POLICIES ..................... 7 1.5 SCOPING AND IDENTIFICATION OF ISSUES ................................................... 8 2.0 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES ........................................................11 2.1 Alternative A: Proposed Action ............................................................................... 11 2.2 Alternative B: No Action Alternative ...................................................................... 11 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated From Detailed Analysis ........................... 12 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT and ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ........12 3.1 Realty and Land Status ............................................................................................ 13 3.2 Vegetation ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Horse-Handling in Shakespeare's Poems And
    HORSE-HANDLING IN SHAKESPEARE’S POEMS AND RENAISSANCE CODES OF CONDUCT by Jonathan W. Thurston Master of Arts in English Middle Tennessee State University December 2016 Thesis Committee: Dr. Marion Hollings, Chair Dr. Kevin Donovan, Reader To Temerita, ever faithful. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS After the many hours, days, weeks, and months put into the creation of this thesis, I am proud to express my sincere gratitude to the people who have helped to shape, mold, and inspire the project. First, I owe innumerable thanks to Dr. Marion Hollings. This project started after our first meeting, at which time we discussed the horses of Shakespeare. Gradually, under her tutelage, the thesis was shaped into its current scope and organization. I have occupied her time during many an office hour and one coffee shop day out, discussing the intricacies of early modern equestrianism. She has been a splendid, committed, and passionate director, and I have learned a tremendous amount from her. Second, I would like to thank Dr. Kevin Donovan for his commitment to making the project as sharp and coherent as possible. His suggestions have proven invaluable, and his insight into Shakespearean scholarship has helped to mold this thesis into a well- researched document. Other acknowledgments go out to Dr. Lynn Enterline for teaching me the importance of understanding Italian and Latin for Renaissance texts; the Gay Rodeo Association for free lessons in equestrianism that aided in my embodied phenomenological approach; Sherayah Witcher for helping me through the awkward phrases and the transportation to campus to receive revisions of the drafts; and, finally, Temerita, my muse.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Research Services
    LEGISLATIVE RESEARCH SERVICES Alaska State Legislature (907) 465‐3991 phone Division of Legal and Research Services (907) 465‐3908 fax State Capitol, Juneau, AK 99801 [email protected] Research Brief TO: Senator John Coghill FROM: Patricia Young, Manager DATE: February 13, 2015 RE: Congressional Logjam over Statehood for Alaska LRS Report 15.259 You asked about attempts before Congress—occurring prior to the 1958 passage of the Statehood Act—that would have enabled the Territory of Alaska to become a state. The movement for statehood for Alaska was long and contentious. In the last years leading up to the constitutional convention, Congress had considered a number of statehood bills with support shifting from House to Senate, but never both at once. For example, a statehood bill for Alaska was approved by the U.S. House of Representatives in 1950, but it died in the Senate. During the following Congress, a bill in the Senate died on a very close vote. Subsequently, with President Eisenhower endorsing statehood for Hawaii, a Hawaii statehood bill passed the House. In order to get the Alaska bill moving, the Senate inserted the Alaska statehood language in the Hawaii bill that had passed the House.1 That bill eventually died when Congress adjourned.2 Other bills similarly attempted to tie statehood for Alaska with that for Hawaii, but none passed. Opposition to Statehood for Alaska Reliable sources at the time and since concur that several factors caused enabling legislation for Alaska’s statehood to falter and die in Congress over a span of many years.
    [Show full text]
  • NP 2013.Docx
    LISTE INTERNATIONALE DES NOMS PROTÉGÉS (également disponible sur notre Site Internet : www.IFHAonline.org) INTERNATIONAL LIST OF PROTECTED NAMES (also available on our Web site : www.IFHAonline.org) Fédération Internationale des Autorités Hippiques de Courses au Galop International Federation of Horseracing Authorities 15/04/13 46 place Abel Gance, 92100 Boulogne, France Tel : + 33 1 49 10 20 15 ; Fax : + 33 1 47 61 93 32 E-mail : [email protected] Internet : www.IFHAonline.org La liste des Noms Protégés comprend les noms : The list of Protected Names includes the names of : F Avant 1996, des chevaux qui ont une renommée F Prior 1996, the horses who are internationally internationale, soit comme principaux renowned, either as main stallions and reproducteurs ou comme champions en courses broodmares or as champions in racing (flat or (en plat et en obstacles), jump) F de 1996 à 2004, des gagnants des neuf grandes F from 1996 to 2004, the winners of the nine épreuves internationales suivantes : following international races : Gran Premio Carlos Pellegrini, Grande Premio Brazil (Amérique du Sud/South America) Japan Cup, Melbourne Cup (Asie/Asia) Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes, Queen Elizabeth II Stakes (Europe/Europa) Breeders’ Cup Classic, Breeders’ Cup Turf (Amérique du Nord/North America) F à partir de 2005, des gagnants des onze grandes F since 2005, the winners of the eleven famous épreuves internationales suivantes : following international races : Gran Premio Carlos Pellegrini, Grande Premio Brazil (Amérique du Sud/South America) Cox Plate (2005), Melbourne Cup (à partir de 2006 / from 2006 onwards), Dubai World Cup, Hong Kong Cup, Japan Cup (Asie/Asia) Prix de l’Arc de Triomphe, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth Stakes, Irish Champion (Europe/Europa) Breeders’ Cup Classic, Breeders’ Cup Turf (Amérique du Nord/North America) F des principaux reproducteurs, inscrits à la F the main stallions and broodmares, registered demande du Comité International des Stud on request of the International Stud Book Books.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nationwide Rivers Inventory APPENDIX National System Components, Study Rivers and Physiographic Maps
    The Nationwide Rivers Inventory APPENDIX National System Components, Study Rivers and Physiographic Maps The National Park Service United States Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20240 January 1982 III. Existing Components of the National System 1981 National Wild and Scenic Rivers System Components State Alaska 1 _ ** River Name County(s)* Segment Reach Agency Contact Description (mile1s) (s) Designation State Congressional Section(s) Length Date of District(s) Managing Physiographic Agency Alagnak River including AK I&W The Alagnak from 67 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Nonvianuk Kukaklek Lake to West 540 West 5th Avenue boundary of T13S, R43W Anchorage, AK 99501 and the entire Nonvianuk River. Alntna River AK B.R. The main stem within the 83 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Gates of the Arctic 540 West 5th Avenue National Park and Preserve. Anchorage, AK 99501 Andreafsky River and AK I614- Segment from its source, 262 12/2/80 FWS Fish and Wildlife Service East Fork including all headwaters 1011 E. Tudor and the East Fork, within Anchorage, AK 99503 the boundary of the Yukon Delta National Wildlife Refuge. AK All of the river 69 12/2/80 NPS National Park Service Aniakchak River P.M. including its major 540 West 5th Avenue including: Hidden Creek tributaries, Hidden Creek, Anchorage, AK 99501 Mystery Creek, Albert Mystery Creek, Albert Johnson Creek, North Fork Johnson Creek, and North Aniakchak River Fork Aniakchak River, within the Aniakchak National Monument and Preserve. *Alaska is organized by boroughs. If a river is in or partially in a borough, it is noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Management Report No. 00-7
    Fishery Management Report No. 00-7 Fishery Management Report for Sport Fisheries in the Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim Management Area from 1995 to 1997 by John Burr June 2000 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish FISHERY MANAGEMENT REPORT NO. 00-7 FISHERY MANAGEMENT REPORT FOR SPORT FISHERIES IN THE ARCTIC-YUKON-KUSKOKWIM MANAGEMENT AREA FROM 1995 TO 1997 by John Burr Division of Sport Fish Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish, Policy and Technical Services 333 Raspberry Road, Anchorage, Alaska, 99518-1599 June 2000 This investigation was partially financed by the Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Act (16 U.S.C. 777-777K) under Project F-10-9, F-10-10. The Fishery Management Reports series was established in 1989 for the publication of an overview of Division of Sport Fish management activities and goals in a specific geographic area. Fishery Management Reports are intended for fishery and other technical professionals, as well as lay persons. Fishery Management Reports are available through the Alaska State Library and on the Internet: http://www.sf.adfg.state.ak.us/statewide/divreports/html/intersearch.cfm This publication has undergone regional peer review. John Burr Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Division of Sport Fish 1300 College Rd. Fairbanks, AK 99701-1599, USA This document should be cited as: Burr, J. 2000. Fishery Management Report for Sport Fisheries in the Arctic-Yukon-Kuskokwim Management Area, 1995 to 1997. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Fishery Management Report No. 00-7, Anchorage. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination on the bases of race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Draft Fisheries Monitoring Plan
    2014 Draft Fisheries Monitoring Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 2 Continuation Projects in 2014 ................................................................................................. 7 Technical Review Committee Membership .............................................................................. 8 Technical Review Committee, Regional Advisory Council, and Interagency Staff Committee Recommendations .................................................................................................................. 9 Summary of Regional Advisory Council Recommendations and Rationale .............................. 15 NORTHERN REGION OVERVIEW .................................................................................... 19 14-101 - Unalakleet River Chinook Salmon Assessment Continuation .................................... 25 14-102 - Climate change and subsistence fisheries: quantifying the direct effects of climatic warming on arctic fishes and lake ecosystems using whole-lake manipulations on the Alaska North Slope ........................................................................................................................... 27 14-103 - Dispersal patterns and summer ocean distribution of adult Dolly Varden in the Beaufort Sea using satellite telemetry ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]