Drivers of Burn Severity in the Northern Cascade Range, Washington, USA

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Drivers of Burn Severity in the Northern Cascade Range, Washington, USA Drivers of burn severity in the northern Cascade Range, Washington, USA C. Alina Cansler A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Washington 2011 Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Forest Resources University of Washington Graduate School This is to certify that I have examined this copy of a master’s thesis by C. Alina Cansler and have found that it is complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the final examining committee have been made. Committee Members: _____________________________________________________ Donald McKenzie _____________________________________________________ L. Monika Moskal _____________________________________________________ Dave L. Peterson Date:__________________________________ In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at the University of Washington, I agree that the Library shall make its copies freely available for inspection. I further agree that extensive copying of this thesis is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Any other reproduction for any purposes or by any means shall not be allowed without my written permission. Signature ________________________ Date ____________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... i LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ iii LIST OF TABLES .............................................................................................................................. v CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT OF THE NORTHERN CASCADE RANGE BURN SEVERITY ATLAS ....... 1 ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3 METHODS ............................................................................................................................ 8 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 15 DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................................... 17 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 20 TABLES ............................................................................................................................. 24 FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ 30 CHAPTER 2: THE FIRE REGIME OF THE NORTHERN CASCADE RANGE, WASHINGTON, USA:A SPATIALLY EXPLICIT ELABORATION OF THE FIRE REGIME CONCEPT ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... 37 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 39 METHODS .......................................................................................................................... 43 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 51 DISCUSSION ....................................................................................................................... 58 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................... 66 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 68 TABLES ............................................................................................................................. 77 FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ 86 i CHAPTER 3: CLIMATE AND TOPOGRAPHICAL INFLUENCES ON BURN SEVERITY IN THE NORTHERN CASCADE RANGE, WASHINGTON, USA ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................................... 98 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 99 METHODS ........................................................................................................................ 102 RESULTS ......................................................................................................................... 107 DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................... 109 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 114 FIGURES .......................................................................................................................... 119 APPENDIX I ..................................................................................................................... 125 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure number Page 1. The study area……………………………………………………………………... 30 2. CBI data sheet……………………………………………………………………... 31 3. Map of field plot locations………………………………………………………… 32 4. Regressions base on unweighted and weighted CBI values………………………. 34 5. DNBR and RdNBR as a function of CRI using Model 2…………………………. 35 6. DNBR and RdNBR as a function of CRI using Model 3…………………………. 35 7. Map of classified burn severity images……………………………………………. 36 8. Map of ecological subsections…………………………………………………….. 86 9. Proportion of area burned by fire size (study area) ……………………………….. 87 10. Proportion of area burned by fire size (subsections)………………………………. 87 11. Burn severity by subsection……………………………………………………….. 88 12. Severity patch distributions for each subsection…………………………………... 89 13. Burn severity and fire size regressions…………………………………………….. 90 14. Gini coefficient plotted against fire size…………………………………………... 91 15. High severity patch distributions by fire size……………………………………… 92 16. High severity core area and fire size regressions………………………………….. 93 17. Contagion Index and fire size regression………………………………………….. 94 18. Aggregation Index and fire size regression………………………………………... 95 19. High severity NLSI and fire size regression………………………………………. 96 20. Clumpiness Index and fire size regressions……………………………………….. 97 21. Climate stations within the study area…………………………………………….. 119 iii 22. Fire occurrence, annual area burned and climate regressions……………………... 120 23. Burn severity and July temperature regressions…………………………………… 120 24. Mean patch size and July temperature regression…………………………………. 121 25. High-severity spatial pattern metrics and climate regressions…………………….. 122 26. Landscape level spatial pattern metrics and topographic complexity regressions… 123 27. Fire size, high severity, and high-severity core area plotted against topographical complexity…………………………………………………………………………. 124 iv LIST OF TABLES Table number Page 1. Maps of field validation plot locations…………………………………………….. 24 2. CBI severity category definitions………………………………………………….. 25 3. Comparison of pixel sub-sampling methods………………………………………. 25 4. Confusion matrices for dNBR…………………………………………………….. 26 5. Confusion matrices for RdNBR…………………………………………………… 27 6. Mean proportion of cover of each stratum………………………………………… 28 7. Classification accuracies compared to other studies………………………………. 29 8. Classification thresholds compared to other studies………………………………. 29 9. Federal land management designation and protected status………………………. 77 10. Ecological subsections and subsection groups…………………………………….. 78 11. "Landscape level" spatial metrics………………………………………………….. 79 12. "Class level" spatial metrics……………………………………………………….. 81 13. Area burned by subsection………………………………………………………… 83 14. Burn severity by subsection……………………………………………………….. 84 15. Spatial pattern metric results………………………………………………………. 85 v 1 CHAPTER 1: DEVELOPMENT OF THE NORTHERN CASCADE RANGE BURN SEVERITY ATLAS ABSTRACT Remotely sensed indices of burn severity are now commonly used by researchers and fire managers to assess post-fire effects, but their relationship to field measurements of burn severity has not been evaluated in all ecosystems. In order to develop a geospatial atlas of burn severity for a 25 year period (1984-2008) in the northern Cascade Range, of Washington, USA, the accuracy of two remotely sensed indices of burn severity, the differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR) and the Relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR), was assessed using field data from 639 plots located across four fires. In the process of comparing the two indexes, two methods of assessing field-based burn severity were compared: the Composite Burn Index (CBI) (Key and Benson 2006) and a newer version of the CBI that weighs severity scores by percentage cover (De Santis and Chuvieco 2009). The new weighted version of the CBI performed worse than the original unweighted version. Three methods of sub-sampling dNBR and RdNBR pixel values at field plot locations were compared, and bilinear interpolation, which uses
Recommended publications
  • Climbing the Sea Annual Report
    WWW.MOUNTAINEERS.ORG MARCH/APRIL 2015 • VOLUME 109 • NO. 2 MountaineerEXPLORE • LEARN • CONSERVE Annual Report 2014 PAGE 3 Climbing the Sea sailing PAGE 23 tableofcontents Mar/Apr 2015 » Volume 109 » Number 2 The Mountaineers enriches lives and communities by helping people explore, conserve, learn about and enjoy the lands and waters of the Pacific Northwest and beyond. Features 3 Breakthrough The Mountaineers Annual Report 2014 23 Climbing the Sea a sailing experience 28 Sea Kayaking 23 a sport for everyone 30 National Trails Day celebrating the trails we love Columns 22 SUMMIT Savvy Guess that peak 29 MEMbER HIGHLIGHT Masako Nair 32 Nature’S WAy Western Bluebirds 34 RETRO REWIND Fred Beckey 36 PEAK FITNESS 30 Back-to-Backs Discover The Mountaineers Mountaineer magazine would like to thank The Mountaineers If you are thinking of joining — or have joined and aren’t sure where Foundation for its financial assistance. The Foundation operates to start — why not set a date to Meet The Mountaineers? Check the as a separate organization from The Mountaineers, which has received about one-third of the Foundation’s gifts to various Branching Out section of the magazine for times and locations of nonprofit organizations. informational meetings at each of our seven branches. Mountaineer uses: CLEAR on the cover: Lori Stamper learning to sail. Sailing story on page 23. photographer: Alan Vogt AREA 2 the mountaineer magazine mar/apr 2015 THE MOUNTAINEERS ANNUAL REPORT 2014 FROM THE BOARD PRESIDENT Without individuals who appreciate the natural world and actively champion its preservation, we wouldn’t have the nearly 110 million acres of wilderness areas that we enjoy today.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington Geology, V, 21, No. 2, July 1993
    WASHINGTON GEOLOGY Washington Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources Vol. 21, No. 2, July 1993 , Mount Baker volcano from the northeast. Bagley Lakes, in the foreground, are on a Pleistocene recessional moraine that is now the parking lot for Mount Baker Ski Area. Just below Sherman Peak, an erosional remnant on the left skyline, is Boulder Glacier. Park and Rainbow Glaciers share the area below the main summit (Grant Peak, 10,778 ft) . Boulder, Park, and Rainbow Glaciers drain into Baker Lake, which is out of the photo on the left. Mazama Glacier forms under the ridge that extends to Hadley Peak on the right. (See related article, p. 3 and Fig. 2, p. 5.) Table Mountain, the flat area just above and to the right of center, is a truncated lava flow. Lincoln Peak is just visible over the right shoulder of Mount Baker. Photo taken in 1964. In This Issue: Current behavior of glaciers in the North Cascades and its effect on regional water supplies, p. 3; Radon potential of Washington, p. 11; Washington areas selected for water quality assessment, p. 14; The changing role of cartogra­ phy in OGER-Plugging into the Geographic Information System, p. 15; Additions to the library, p. 16. Revised State Surface Minin!Jf Act-1993 by Raymond Lasmanls WASHINGTON The 1993 regular session of the 53rd Le:gislature passed a major revision of the surface mine reclamation act as En­ GEOLOGY grossed Second Substitute Senate Bill No. 5502. The new law takes effect on July 1, 1993. Both environmental groups and surface miners testified in favor of the act.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the CHELAN 30-MINUTE by 60-MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON by R
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-1661 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CHELAN 30-MINUTE BY 60-MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON By R. W. Tabor, V. A. Frizzell, Jr., J. T. Whetten, R. B. Waitt, D. A. Swanson, G. R. Byerly, D. B. Booth, M. J. Hetherington, and R. E. Zartman INTRODUCTION Bedrock of the Chelan 1:100,000 quadrangle displays a long and varied geologic history (fig. 1). Pioneer geologic work in the quadrangle began with Bailey Willis (1887, 1903) and I. C. Russell (1893, 1900). A. C. Waters (1930, 1932, 1938) made the first definitive geologic studies in the area (fig. 2). He mapped and described the metamorphic rocks and the lavas of the Columbia River Basalt Group in the vicinity of Chelan as well as the arkoses within the Chiwaukum graben (fig. 1). B. M. Page (1939a, b) detailed much of the structure and petrology of the metamorphic and igneous rocks in the Chiwaukum Mountains, further described the arkoses, and, for the first time, defined the alpine glacial stages in the area. C. L. Willis (1950, 1953) was the first to recognize the Chiwaukum graben, one of the more significant structural features of the region. The pre-Tertiary schists and gneisses are continuous with rocks to the north included in the Skagit Metamorphic Suite of Misch (1966, p. 102-103). Peter Misch and his students established a framework of North Cascade metamorphic geology which underlies much of our construct, especially in the western part of the quadrangle. Our work began in 1975 and was essentially completed in 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thermal History of Garland Mineral Springs, North Cascades
    GRC Transactions, Vol. 39, 2015 The Thermal History of Garland Mineral Springs, North Cascades, Washington, From Apatite Fission Track Analysis of Well Cuttings From Geothermal Exploration Well GAR-1 Owen A. Callahan1, Trenton T. Cladouhos2, Benjamin Larson3, and Richard A. Ketcham4 1The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Austin TX 2AltaRock Energy, Seattle WA 3NOAA/PMEL, Seattle WA 4The University of Texas at Austin, Jackson School of Geosciences, Austin TX Keywords Thermochronology, apatite fission track, Garland Mineral Springs, GAR-1, Snohomish Public Utility District (SnoPUD), Washington Abstract Commercial geothermal resources in the Washington Cascades remain elusive, despite several decades of reconnais- sance. Recent efforts at development include geochemical analysis and exploration drilling at Garland Mineral Springs. These springs consist of a large surface manifestation of warm water and high CO2 and magmatic He discharge. Snohomish Public Utility District funded two wells at this site: a shallow (213 m) temperature gradient hole, and exploration slimhole GAR-1 (1524 m). A promising temperature gradient observed in the shallow well, in excess of 80 °C/km, reverted to a lower gradient (~32 °C/km) below 600 m in GAR-1 Both wells encountered CO2-charged artesian flow and bleached granite. However, sub-economic temperatures and low flow rates forced the District to abandon the project.Material from GAR-1 is uniquely suited to address questions about the onset of hydrothermal fluid flow in low-temperature, high gas flux thermal springs found throughout the Washington Cascades, and to help characterize the geothermal resource in this region. In this study, 4 depths were selected for apatite fission track (AFT) analysis: 201 m, 494 m, 920 m, and 1513 m.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Behavior of Glaciers in the North Cascades and Effect on Regional Water Supplies
    Current Behavior of Glaciers in the North Cascades and Effect on Regional Water Supplies by Mauri S. Pelto North Cascades Glacier Climate Project Foundation for Glacier and Environmental Research Seattle, WA 98109 Reprinted from Washington Geology Vo121, No. 2, pp 3-10 1993 Current Behavior of Glaciers in the North Cascades and Effect on Regional Water Supplies by Mauri S. Pelto Foundation for Glacier and Environmental Research Pacific Science Center, Seattle, WA 98109 The North Cascade Glacier Climate Project (NCGCP)was es- The recent advance was much smaller, and only 50 "r 60 tablished in 1983 to monitor the response of North Cascade percent of the North Cascade glaciers advanced (Hubley, glaciers to changes in climate. NCGCP receives its funds from 1956; Meier and Post, 1962). numerous sources, primarily the Foundation for Glacier and During the Little Ice Age mean annual temperatures were Environmental Research. Each summer, NCGCP hires sev- 1.0 to 1.5OC (1.8-2.8OF) cooler than at present (Burbnk, eral students from Pacific Northwest colleges as assistants. 1981; Porter, 1981). Depending on the giacier, the maxi- Between 1984 and 1990, NCGCP obsewed the behavior of mum advance occurred in the 16th 18th, or 19th cenbry, 117 glaciers; 47 of these were selected for annual study with Iittle retreat prior to 1850 (Miller, 1966; Long, 1956). (Rg. 1). NCGCP has collected detailed information (terminus The temperature rise at the end of the Little Ice Age led to behavior, geographic characteristics, and sensitivity to cli- ubiquitous and rapid retreat from 1880 to 1944 (Hubley, mate) on 107 glaciers in every part of the North Cascade 1956).
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air USA (W7W)
    Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7W) Association Reference Manual (ARM) Document Reference S39.1 Issue number 2.0 Date of issue 01-Dec-2016 Participation start date 01-July-2009 Authorised Date 08-Jul-2009 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Darryl Holman, WW7D, [email protected] Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Summits on the Air – ARM for USA W7W-Washington Table of contents Change Control ................................................................................................................... 4 Disclaimer ........................................................................................................................... 5 Copyright Notices ............................................................................................................... 5 1.0 Association Reference Data .......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Program Derivation ....................................................................................................... 7 2.2 General Information ...................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Final Access, Activation Zone, and Operating Location Explained ............................. 8 2.4 Rights of Way and Access Issues ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Facts About Washington's Retreating Glaciers and Declining Snow Pack
    Facts about Washington’s retreating glaciers and declining snow pack from Ecology’s Water Resources Program Washington is especially vulnerable to climate change resulting from global warming, 53 North Cascades and a major reason for this is our dependence on glaciers and mountain snow pack to glaciers gone feed summer stream flows. since 1950s Mountain snowfall varies from year to year, so it's difficult for scientists to agree on predictions about future snow pack. But, the scientists who study climate change agree that more precipitation will fall as rain rather than snow in the years to come. Several well documented trends in Washington provide compelling evidence in Multiple droughts support of Washington's aggressive response to climate change. 2000-2005 For example: • Multiple droughts since 1971 caused dried-up stream beds, withered and abandoned crops, dead fish, record low rivers and declining aquifers. Between 2000 and 2005, Washington experienced two drought emergencies, resulting in drought declarations by Governors Locke and Gregoire. Threefold increase in wildfires • An effect of global warming is an increase in the frequency of droughts. 1970-2006 Washington has experienced unusually dry periods almost every year since 2000. • During the drought of 2001, hundreds of thousands of juvenile salmon were stranded by low flows in the Columbia River and were unable to travel to the Pacific Ocean. In spring 2005, above-average ocean temperatures and reduced ocean movement resulted in a 20 to 30 percent drop in juvenile marine salmon populations. Lake Roosevelt (mouth of the Colville River) in Stevens County. Ecology Photo, 2005 Drought. April 2007 07-11-016 Original printed on recycled paper • The average mountain snow pack in the North Cascades (critical to summer stream- flows) has declined at 73 percent of mountain sites studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenpeak and Dirtyface Plutons, North Cascades, ABSTRACT by Ductile Flow and at Least Modest Stoping Were Important During Emplace- Western North America: Geosphere, V
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Construction, emplacement, and geochemical evolution of 1 of 26 deep-crustal intrusions: Tenpeak and Dirtyface plutons, / GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 2 p. XXX–XXX North Cascades, western North America doi:10.1130/GES01490.1 Robert B. Miller1,*, Susan M. DeBari2,*, and Scott R. Paterson3,* 14 figures; 1 table; 1 supplemental file 1Department of Geology, San Jose State University, San Jose, California 95192, USA 2 Department of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225, USA 1st pages 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740, USA CORRESPONDENCE: [email protected] CITATION: Miller, R.B., DeBari, S.M., and Pater- son, S.R., 2018, Construction, emplacement, and geochemical evolution of deep-crustal intrusions: Tenpeak and Dirtyface plutons, North Cascades, ABSTRACT by ductile flow and at least modest stoping were important during emplace- western North America: Geosphere, v. 14, no. 2, p. ment of the larger bodies. XXX–XXX, doi:10.1130/GES01490.1. Deep plutonic systems represent an important link between low- Only small ephemeral magma chambers formed in the early stages of er-crustal melt-generation sites and higher-level regions of magma accumu- pluton construction, but larger bodies (tens of cubic kilometers) probably re- Science Editor: Shanaka de Silva GS01490_Miller Associate Editor: Rita Economos lation, but models for these systems are limited by the relative scarcity of mained mushy during crystallization of the relatively homogeneous younger exposed weakly deformed, deep-crustal plutons. Exceptions include the ca. tonalites. The juxtaposition of different magma subtypes, at least local mix- Received 2 January 2017 92.3–89.7 Ma, dominantly tonalitic Tenpeak pluton and the smaller, nearby ing at the emplacement level, and removal and/or recycling of older magmas Revision received 25 January 2018 ca.
    [Show full text]
  • 1983-1990 from the Mountaineer Annual,1917 � 1J\ � I GU{-� �WJ A,,Ij·(/1L7ti;:Uza
    The Mountaineer 1983-1990 From The Mountaineer Annual,1917 � 1J\ � i GU{-� �WJ a,,ij·(/1l7ti;:uza... a..,.plit �� � . - �/VJ 1 �It..! I n,.a.t�q, fA..J.. b..ra Ddl,l\.d -lo � ��­ � �,f VJ ,J/�t�P.J- if.dJK.>() � Su.ca.,.J,;" • fmu.4 - � f-cAw iiJ., it-.: 'r thft� , tllvtll c,.;r-,-... /IJf.i... a,, "iIA,f.Q _,_..,.. • The Mountaineer 1983-1990 Published August, 1991 2 TheMountaineer The Mountaineer Intrue Mountaineers' tradition, the text, photographs and productionof this bookhas beendone entirelyby volunteers. And soa specialthank you goesto all who gaveof theirtalent, time and inspiration increating, after a sevenyear hiatus, this newestedition of The MountaineerAnnual. EditorialCommittee Judi Maxwell-Editor,Production Manager, layout Ann Marshall-Word Processing,Advertising, layout MarciaHanson-Word Processing, Advertising, Table Transcriptions FrankSincock-Advertising Manager Karen Sykes-Word Processing BobBums---Committee Ken Lans-DesktopPublishing Marge Mueller-ProductionConsultant (Mountaineers Books) Cover Design: Judi Maxwell and Ann Marshall Cover Photographs: Front-Climbingnear Mt. Constance, © Marie Mills/David Cummings Back-ThunderCreek, North Cascades, © Dennis O'Callaghan Thank you alsoto thefollowing Mountaineerstaff members:Virginia Felton,Executive Director; Ann Halinger; Eileen Allen; BobPodrat; and DonnaDeShazo and Art Freeman of MountaineersBooks. Copyright© 1991by The Mountaineers 300Third Avenue West Seattle,Washington 98119 Printedon recycledpaper The Mountaineers Purposes To explore and study the mountains, forests and watercourses of the Northwest; To gather into permanent form the history and traditions of this region; To preserve by the encouragement of protective legislation or otherwise the natural beauty of NorthwestAmerica; To make expeditionsinto these regions in fulfillment of the above purposes; To encourage a spirit of good fellowship among all lovers of outdoor life.
    [Show full text]