Research Paper GEOSPHERE Construction, emplacement, and geochemical evolution of 1 of 26 deep-crustal intrusions: Tenpeak and Dirtyface plutons, / GEOSPHERE; v. 14, no. 2 p. XXX–XXX North Cascades, western North America doi:10.1130/GES01490.1 Robert B. Miller1,*, Susan M. DeBari2,*, and Scott R. Paterson3,* 14 figures; 1 table; 1 supplemental file 1Department of Geology, San Jose State University, San Jose, California 95192, USA 2 Department of Geology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington 98225, USA 1st pages 3Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-0740, USA CORRESPONDENCE:
[email protected] CITATION: Miller, R.B., DeBari, S.M., and Pater- son, S.R., 2018, Construction, emplacement, and geochemical evolution of deep-crustal intrusions: Tenpeak and Dirtyface plutons, North Cascades, ABSTRACT by ductile flow and at least modest stoping were important during emplace- western North America: Geosphere, v. 14, no. 2, p. ment of the larger bodies. XXX–XXX, doi:10.1130/GES01490.1. Deep plutonic systems represent an important link between low- Only small ephemeral magma chambers formed in the early stages of er-crustal melt-generation sites and higher-level regions of magma accumu- pluton construction, but larger bodies (tens of cubic kilometers) probably re- Science Editor: Shanaka de Silva GS01490_Miller Associate Editor: Rita Economos lation, but models for these systems are limited by the relative scarcity of mained mushy during crystallization of the relatively homogeneous younger exposed weakly deformed, deep-crustal plutons. Exceptions include the ca. tonalites. The juxtaposition of different magma subtypes, at least local mix- Received 2 January 2017 92.3–89.7 Ma, dominantly tonalitic Tenpeak pluton and the smaller, nearby ing at the emplacement level, and removal and/or recycling of older magmas Revision received 25 January 2018 ca.